Compare commits

..

3 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Pratik Mankawde
df395d6851 test: Add null check unit test for Oracle::aggregatePrice (#7306)
Signed-off-by: Pratik Mankawde <3397372+pratikmankawde@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-06-11 18:05:36 +00:00
Ayaz Salikhov
8e618d68cd ci: Patch conan recipe for Nix to be able to use on macOS (#7532) 2026-06-11 17:36:33 +00:00
Ayaz Salikhov
cee157485e ci: Run sanitizers on release builds too (#7527) 2026-06-11 12:59:22 +00:00
37 changed files with 121 additions and 6838 deletions

View File

@@ -46,9 +46,6 @@ libxrpl.shamap > xrpl.basics
libxrpl.shamap > xrpl.nodestore
libxrpl.shamap > xrpl.protocol
libxrpl.shamap > xrpl.shamap
libxrpl.telemetry > xrpl.basics
libxrpl.telemetry > xrpl.config
libxrpl.telemetry > xrpl.telemetry
libxrpl.tx > xrpl.basics
libxrpl.tx > xrpl.conditions
libxrpl.tx > xrpl.core
@@ -214,7 +211,6 @@ tests.libxrpl > xrpl.protocol
tests.libxrpl > xrpl.protocol_autogen
tests.libxrpl > xrpl.server
tests.libxrpl > xrpl.shamap
tests.libxrpl > xrpl.telemetry
tests.libxrpl > xrpl.tx
xrpl.conditions > xrpl.basics
xrpl.conditions > xrpl.protocol
@@ -251,9 +247,6 @@ xrpl.server > xrpl.shamap
xrpl.shamap > xrpl.basics
xrpl.shamap > xrpl.nodestore
xrpl.shamap > xrpl.protocol
xrpl.telemetry > xrpl.config
xrpl.telemetry > xrpld.consensus
xrpl.telemetry > xrpld.rpc
xrpl.tx > xrpl.basics
xrpl.tx > xrpl.core
xrpl.tx > xrpl.ledger
@@ -273,7 +266,6 @@ xrpld.app > xrpl.rdb
xrpld.app > xrpl.resource
xrpld.app > xrpl.server
xrpld.app > xrpl.shamap
xrpld.app > xrpl.telemetry
xrpld.app > xrpl.tx
xrpld.consensus > xrpl.basics
xrpld.consensus > xrpl.json

View File

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
{
"compiler": ["gcc", "clang"],
"build_type": ["Debug"],
"build_type": ["Debug", "Release"],
"arch": ["amd64"],
"sanitizers": ["address", "undefinedbehavior"]
},

View File

@@ -117,18 +117,6 @@ if(rocksdb)
target_link_libraries(xrpl_libs INTERFACE RocksDB::rocksdb)
endif()
# OpenTelemetry distributed tracing (optional).
# When ON, links against opentelemetry-cpp and defines XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY
# so that tracing macros in TracingInstrumentation.h are compiled in.
# When OFF (default), all tracing code compiles to no-ops with zero overhead.
# Enable via: conan install -o telemetry=True, or cmake -Dtelemetry=ON.
option(telemetry "Enable OpenTelemetry tracing" ON)
if(telemetry)
find_package(opentelemetry-cpp CONFIG REQUIRED)
add_compile_definitions(XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY)
message(STATUS "OpenTelemetry tracing enabled")
endif()
# Work around changes to Conan recipe for now.
if(TARGET nudb::core)
set(nudb nudb::core)

View File

@@ -300,46 +300,6 @@ If you wish to automatically fix whatever clang-tidy finds _and_ is capable of f
run-clang-tidy -p build -quiet -fix -allow-no-checks src tests
```
## Telemetry span attribute naming
OpenTelemetry span attribute keys follow these rules so they stay consistent
across the code, the OTel collector, Tempo, Grafana dashboards, and docs. The
constants in the `*SpanNames.h` headers are the single source of truth; every
other layer must match them. A CI check enforces this end to end.
1. Per-span unique attribute: bare field name — allowed when the field is
recorded by a single span/workflow, so the span name already supplies the
domain (e.g. `command`, `local`, `version` on `rpc.command` / `tx.process`).
2. Shared attribute (same concept on more than one span): ONE key, reused
verbatim on every span that records it — the span name tells the occurrences
apart, so no per-emitter prefix is added. Pick the name by the field's
meaning: a property of a domain object keeps that object's bare field name
(`ledger_hash`, `ledger_seq`, `tx_hash`, `peer_id`, `full_validation`); a
field already qualified by a sub-kind keeps that qualifier on every emitter
(`proposal_trusted` on both `consensus.proposal.receive` and
`peer.proposal.receive`; `validation_trusted` likewise). Define it once in
the base `SpanNames.h` `namespace attr` block and re-export (`using`) it from
each domain header, so all emitters share the exact string.
3. Collision qualifier: `<domain>_<field>` — only when a bare name would collide
with a DIFFERENT concept in the shared spanmetrics label space, or with the
OTel-reserved `status` key (e.g. `rpc_status`, `grpc_status`,
`consensus_state`, `consensus_round`). This disambiguates distinct concepts
that share a word; it is NOT used to tag the same concept with the workflow
that emitted it — that is rule 2 (one shared name).
4. Resource attribute: dotted `xrpl.<subsystem>.<field>` — reserved ONLY for
process/network identity set once at startup (`xrpl.network.id`,
`xrpl.network.type`). Never use the dotted `xrpl.` form for span attributes.
5. Span names use `<subsystem>[.<component>]` (dotted). Only attribute _keys_
follow rules 14.
Standard OpenTelemetry semantic-convention keys keep their canonical dotted
form (e.g. `service.*` resource attributes, `http.*` span attributes); the
"no dotted form" rule above applies to xrpl-custom keys, not to OTel-standard
conventions.
Always reference the `*SpanNames.h` constants — never pass string literals as
attribute keys or values to `setAttribute`/`addEvent`.
## Contracts and instrumentation
We are using [Antithesis](https://antithesis.com/) for continuous fuzzing,

View File

@@ -1,565 +0,0 @@
# Distributed Tracing Fundamentals
> **Parent Document**: [OpenTelemetryPlan.md](./OpenTelemetryPlan.md)
> **Next**: [Architecture Analysis](./01-architecture-analysis.md)
---
## What is Distributed Tracing?
Distributed tracing is a method for tracking data objects as they flow through distributed systems. In a network like XRP Ledger, a single transaction touches multiple independent nodes—each with no shared memory or logging. Distributed tracing connects these dots.
**Without tracing:** You see isolated logs on each node with no way to correlate them.
**With tracing:** You see the complete journey of a transaction or an event across all nodes it touched.
---
## Actors and Actions at a Glance
### Actors
| Who (Plain English) | Technical Term |
| ---------------------------------------------- | --------------- |
| A single unit of work being tracked | Span |
| The complete journey of a request | Trace |
| Data that links spans across services | Trace Context |
| Code that creates spans and propagates context | Instrumentation |
| Service that receives and processes traces | Collector |
| Storage and visualization system | Backend (Tempo) |
| Decision logic for which traces to keep | Sampler |
### Actions
| What Happens (Plain English) | Technical Term |
| --------------------------------------- | ----------------------- |
| Start tracking a new operation | Create a Span |
| Connect a child operation to its parent | Set `parent_span_id` |
| Group all related operations together | Share a `trace_id` |
| Pass tracking data between services | Context Propagation |
| Decide whether to record a trace | Sampling (Head or Tail) |
| Send completed traces to storage | Export (OTLP) |
---
## Core Concepts
### 1. Trace
A **trace** represents the entire journey of a request through the system. It has a unique `trace_id` that stays constant across all nodes.
```
Trace ID: abc123
├── Node A: received transaction
├── Node B: relayed transaction
├── Node C: included in consensus
└── Node D: applied to ledger
```
### 2. Span
A **span** represents a single unit of work within a trace. Each span has:
| Attribute | Description | Example |
| ---------------- | -------------------------------- | -------------------------- |
| `trace_id` | Identifies the trace | `event123` |
| `span_id` | Unique identifier | `span456` |
| `parent_span_id` | Parent span (if any) | `p_span123` |
| `name` | Operation name | `rpc.submit` |
| `start_time` | When work began (local time) | `2024-01-15T10:30:00Z` |
| `end_time` | When work completed (local time) | `2024-01-15T10:30:00.050Z` |
| `attributes` | Key-value metadata | `tx_hash=ABC...` |
| `status` | OK, ERROR MSG | `OK` |
### 3. Trace Context
**Trace context** is the data that propagates between services to link spans together. It contains:
- `trace_id` - The trace this span belongs to
- `span_id` - The current span (becomes parent for child spans)
- `trace_flags` - Sampling decisions
---
## How Spans Form a Trace
Spans have parent-child relationships forming a tree structure:
```mermaid
flowchart TB
subgraph trace["Trace: abc123"]
A["tx.submit<br/>span_id: 001<br/>50ms"] --> B["tx.validate<br/>span_id: 002<br/>5ms"]
A --> C["tx.relay<br/>span_id: 003<br/>10ms"]
A --> D["tx.apply<br/>span_id: 004<br/>30ms"]
D --> E["ledger.update<br/>span_id: 005<br/>20ms"]
end
style A fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#ffffff
style B fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#ffffff
style C fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#ffffff
style D fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#ffffff
style E fill:#bf360c,stroke:#8c2809,color:#ffffff
```
**Reading the diagram:**
- **tx.submit (blue, root)**: The top-level span representing the entire transaction submission; all other spans are its descendants.
- **tx.validate, tx.relay, tx.apply (green)**: Direct children of tx.submit, representing the three main stages -- validation, relay to peers, and application to the ledger.
- **ledger.update (red)**: A grandchild span nested under tx.apply, representing the actual ledger state mutation triggered by applying the transaction.
- **Arrows (parent to child)**: Each arrow indicates a parent-child span relationship where the parent's completion depends on the child finishing.
The same trace visualized as a **timeline (Gantt chart)**:
```
Time → 0ms 10ms 20ms 30ms 40ms 50ms
├───────────────────────────────────────────┤
tx.submit│▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓│
├─────┤
tx.valid │▓▓▓▓▓│
│ ├──────────┤
tx.relay │ │▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓│
│ ├────────────────────────────┤
tx.apply │ │▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓│
│ ├──────────────────┤
ledger │ │▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓│
```
---
## Span Relationships
Spans don't always form simple parent-child trees. Distributed tracing defines several relationship types to capture different causal patterns:
### 1. Parent-Child (ChildOf)
The default relationship. The parent span **depends on** or **contains** the child span. The child runs within the scope of the parent.
```
tx.submit (parent)
├── tx.validate (child) ← parent waits for this
├── tx.relay (child) ← parent waits for this
└── tx.apply (child) ← parent waits for this
```
**When to use:** Synchronous calls, nested operations, any case where the parent's completion depends on the child.
### 2. Follows-From
A causal relationship where the first span **triggers** the second, but does **not wait** for it. The originator fires and moves on.
```
Time →
tx.receive [=======]
↓ triggers (follows-from)
tx.relay [===========] ← runs independently
```
**When to use:** Asynchronous jobs, queued work, fire-and-forget patterns. For example, a node receives a transaction and queues it for relay — the relay span _follows from_ the receive span but the receiver doesn't wait for relaying to complete.
> **OpenTracing** defined `FollowsFrom` as a first-class reference type alongside `ChildOf`.
> **OpenTelemetry** represents this using **Span Links** with descriptive attributes instead (see below).
### 3. Span Links (Cross-Trace and Non-Hierarchical)
Links connect spans that are **causally related but not in a parent-child hierarchy**. Unlike parent-child, links can cross trace boundaries.
```
Trace A Trace B
────── ──────
batch.schedule batch.execute
├─ item.enqueue (span X) ┌──► process.item
├─ item.enqueue (span Y) ───┤ (links to X, Y, Z)
├─ item.enqueue (span Z) └──►
```
**Use cases:**
| Pattern | Description |
| -------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| **Batch processing** | A batch span links back to all individual spans that contributed to it |
| **Fan-in** | An aggregation span links to the multiple producer spans it merges |
| **Fan-out** | Multiple downstream spans link back to the single span that triggered them |
| **Async handoff** | A deferred job links back to the request that queued it (follows-from) |
| **Cross-trace** | Correlating spans across independent traces (e.g., retries, related events) |
**Link structure:** Each link carries the target span's context plus optional attributes:
```
Link {
trace_id: <target trace>
span_id: <target span>
attributes: { "link.description": "triggered by batch scheduler" }
}
```
### Relationship Summary
```mermaid
flowchart LR
subgraph parent_child["Parent-Child"]
direction TB
P["Parent"] --> C["Child"]
end
subgraph follows_from["Follows-From"]
direction TB
A["Span A"] -.->|triggers| B["Span B"]
end
subgraph links["Span Links"]
direction TB
X["Span X\n(Trace 1)"] -.-|link| Y["Span Y\n(Trace 2)"]
end
parent_child ~~~ follows_from ~~~ links
style P fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#ffffff
style C fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#ffffff
style A fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#ffffff
style B fill:#bf360c,stroke:#8c2809,color:#ffffff
style X fill:#4a148c,stroke:#38006b,color:#ffffff
style Y fill:#4a148c,stroke:#38006b,color:#ffffff
```
| Relationship | Same Trace? | Dependency? | OTel Mechanism |
| ---------------- | ----------- | -------------------------- | ----------------- |
| **Parent-Child** | Yes | Parent depends on child | `parent_span_id` |
| **Follows-From** | Usually | Causal but no dependency | Link + attributes |
| **Span Link** | Either | Correlation, no dependency | Link + attributes |
---
## Trace ID Generation
A `trace_id` is a 128-bit (16-byte) identifier that groups all spans belonging to one logical operation. How it's generated determines how easily you can find and correlate traces later.
### General Approaches
#### 1. Random (W3C Default)
Generate a random 128-bit ID when a trace starts. Standard approach for most services.
```
trace_id = random_128_bits()
```
| Pros | Cons |
| --------------------------- | --------------------------------------------- |
| Simple, standard | No natural correlation to domain events |
| Guaranteed unique per trace | If propagation is lost, trace is broken |
| Works with all OTel tooling | "Find trace for TX abc" requires index lookup |
#### 2. Deterministic (Derived from Domain Data)
Compute the trace_id from a hash of a natural identifier. Every node independently derives the **same** trace_id for the same event.
```
trace_id = SHA-256(domain_identifier)[0:16] // truncate to 128 bits
```
| Pros | Cons |
| --------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------- |
| Propagation-resilient — same ID computed everywhere | Same event processed twice (retry) shares trace_id |
| Natural search — domain ID maps directly to trace | Non-standard (tooling assumes random) |
| No coordination needed between nodes | 256→128 bit truncation (collision risk negligible at ~2⁶⁴) |
#### 3. Hybrid (Deterministic Prefix + Random Suffix)
First 8 bytes derived from domain data, last 8 bytes random.
```
trace_id = SHA-256(domain_identifier)[0:8] || random_64_bits()
```
| Pros | Cons |
| ------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------- |
| Prefix search: "find all traces for TX abc" | Must propagate to maintain full trace_id |
| Unique per processing instance | More complex generation logic |
| Retries get distinct trace_ids | Partial correlation only (prefix match) |
### XRPL Workflow Analysis
XRPL has a unique advantage: its core workflows produce **globally unique 256-bit hashes** that are known on every node. This makes deterministic trace_id generation practical in ways most systems can't achieve.
#### Natural Identifiers by Workflow
| Workflow | Natural Identifier | Size | Known at Start? | Same on All Nodes? |
| ------------------- | --------------------------------- | ---------- | ----------------------------- | -------------------------------- |
| **Transaction** | Transaction hash (`tid_`) | 256-bit | Yes — computed before signing | Yes — hash of canonical tx data |
| **Consensus round** | Previous ledger hash + ledger seq | 256+32 bit | Yes — known when round opens | Yes — all validators agree |
| **Validation** | Ledger hash being validated | 256-bit | Yes — from consensus result | Yes — same closed ledger |
| **Ledger catch-up** | Target ledger hash | 256-bit | Yes — we know what to fetch | Yes — identifies ledger globally |
#### Where These Identifiers Live in Code
```
Transaction: STTx::getTransactionID() → uint256 tid_
TMTransaction::rawTransaction → recompute hash from bytes
Consensus: ConsensusProposal::prevLedger_ → uint256 (previous ledger hash)
ConsensusProposal::position_ → uint256 (TxSet hash)
LedgerHeader::seq → uint32_t (ledger sequence)
Validation: STValidation::getLedgerHash() → uint256
STValidation::getNodeID() → NodeID (160-bit)
Ledger fetch: InboundLedger constructor → uint256 hash, uint32_t seq
TMGetLedger::ledgerHash → bytes (uint256)
```
### Recommended Strategy: Workflow-Scoped Deterministic
Each workflow type derives its trace_id from its natural domain identifier:
```
Transaction trace: trace_id = SHA-256("tx" || tx_hash)[0:16]
Consensus trace: trace_id = SHA-256("cons" || prev_ledger_hash || ledger_seq)[0:16]
Ledger catch-up: trace_id = SHA-256("fetch" || target_ledger_hash)[0:16]
```
The string prefix (`"tx"`, `"cons"`, `"fetch"`) prevents collisions between workflows that might share underlying hashes.
**Why this works for XRPL:**
1. **Propagation-resilient** — Even if a P2P message drops trace context, every node independently computes the same trace_id from the same tx_hash or ledger_hash. Spans still correlate.
2. **Zero-cost search** — "Show me the trace for transaction ABC" becomes a direct lookup: compute `SHA-256("tx" || ABC)[0:16]` and query. No secondary index needed.
3. **Cross-workflow linking via Span Links** — A consensus trace links to individual transaction traces. A validation span links to the consensus trace. This connects the full picture without forcing everything into one giant trace.
### Cross-Workflow Correlation
Each workflow gets its own trace. Span Links tie them together:
```mermaid
flowchart TB
subgraph tx_trace["Transaction Trace"]
direction LR
Tn["trace_id = f(tx_hash)"]:::note --> T1["tx.receive"] --> T2["tx.validate"] --> T3["tx.relay"]
end
subgraph cons_trace["Consensus Trace"]
direction LR
Cn["trace_id = f(prev_ledger, seq)"]:::note --> C1["cons.open"] --> C2["cons.propose"] --> C3["cons.accept"]
end
subgraph val_trace["Validation"]
direction LR
Vn["spans within consensus trace"]:::note --> V1["val.create"] --> V2["val.broadcast"]
end
subgraph fetch_trace["Catch-Up Trace"]
direction LR
Fn["trace_id = f(ledger_hash)"]:::note --> F1["fetch.request"] --> F2["fetch.receive"] --> F3["fetch.apply"]
end
C1 -.-|"span link\n(tx traces)"| T3
C3 --> V1
F1 -.-|"span link\n(target ledger)"| C3
classDef note fill:none,stroke:#888,stroke-dasharray:5 5,color:#333,font-style:italic
style T1 fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#ffffff
style T2 fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#ffffff
style T3 fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#ffffff
style C1 fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#ffffff
style C2 fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#ffffff
style C3 fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#ffffff
style V1 fill:#bf360c,stroke:#8c2809,color:#ffffff
style V2 fill:#bf360c,stroke:#8c2809,color:#ffffff
style F1 fill:#4a148c,stroke:#38006b,color:#ffffff
style F2 fill:#4a148c,stroke:#38006b,color:#ffffff
style F3 fill:#4a148c,stroke:#38006b,color:#ffffff
```
**Reading the diagram:**
- **Transaction Trace (blue)**: An independent trace whose `trace_id` is deterministically derived from the transaction hash. Contains receive, validate, and relay spans.
- **Consensus Trace (green)**: An independent trace whose `trace_id` is derived from the previous ledger hash and sequence number. Covers the open, propose, and accept phases.
- **Validation (red)**: Validation spans live within the consensus trace (not a separate trace). They are created after the accept phase completes.
- **Catch-Up Trace (purple)**: An independent trace for ledger acquisition, derived from the target ledger hash. Used when a node is behind and fetching missing ledgers.
- **Dotted arrows (span links)**: Cross-trace correlations. Consensus links to transaction traces it included; catch-up links to the consensus trace that produced the target ledger.
- **Solid arrow (C3 to V1)**: A parent-child relationship -- validation spans are direct children of the consensus accept span within the same trace.
**How a query flows:**
```
"Why was TX abc slow?"
1. Compute trace_id = SHA-256("tx" || abc)[0:16]
2. Find transaction trace → see it was included in consensus round N
3. Follow span link → consensus trace for round N
4. See which phase was slow (propose? accept?)
5. If a node was catching up, follow link → catch-up trace
```
### Trade-offs to Consider
| Concern | Mitigation |
| ----------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| **Retries get same trace_id** | Add `attempt` attribute to root span; spans have unique span_ids and timestamps |
| **256→128 bit truncation** | Birthday-bound collision at ~2⁶⁴ operations — negligible for XRPL's throughput |
| **Non-standard generation** | OTel spec allows any 16-byte non-zero value; tooling works on the hex string |
| **Hash computation cost** | SHA-256 is ~0.3μs per call; XRPL already computes these hashes for other purposes |
| **Late-binding identifiers** | Ledger hash isn't known until after consensus — validation spans use ledger_seq as fallback, then link to the consensus trace |
---
## Distributed Traces Across Nodes
In distributed systems like xrpld, traces span **multiple independent nodes**. The trace context must be propagated in network messages:
```mermaid
sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant NodeA as Node A
participant NodeB as Node B
participant NodeC as Node C
Client->>NodeA: Submit TX<br/>(no trace context)
Note over NodeA: Creates new trace<br/>trace_id: abc123<br/>span: tx.receive
NodeA->>NodeB: Relay TX<br/>(trace_id: abc123, parent: 001)
Note over NodeB: Creates child span<br/>span: tx.relay<br/>parent_span_id: 001
NodeA->>NodeC: Relay TX<br/>(trace_id: abc123, parent: 001)
Note over NodeC: Creates child span<br/>span: tx.relay<br/>parent_span_id: 001
Note over NodeA,NodeC: All spans share trace_id: abc123<br/>enabling correlation across nodes
```
**Reading the diagram:**
- **Client**: The external entity that submits a transaction. It does not carry trace context -- the trace originates at the first node.
- **Node A**: The entry point that creates a new trace (trace_id: abc123) and the root span `tx.receive`. It relays the transaction to peers with trace context attached.
- **Node B and Node C**: Peer nodes that receive the relayed transaction along with the propagated trace context. Each creates a child span under Node A's span, preserving the same `trace_id`.
- **Arrows with trace context**: The relay messages carry `trace_id` and `parent_span_id`, allowing each downstream node to link its spans back to the originating span on Node A.
---
## Context Propagation
For traces to work across nodes, **trace context must be propagated** in messages.
### What's in the Context (~26 bytes)
| Field | Size | Description |
| ------------- | -------- | ------------------------------------------------------- |
| `trace_id` | 16 bytes | Identifies the entire trace (constant across all nodes) |
| `span_id` | 8 bytes | The sender's current span (becomes parent on receiver) |
| `trace_flags` | 1 byte | Sampling decision (bit 0 = sampled; bits 1-7 reserved) |
| `trace_state` | variable | Optional vendor-specific data (typically omitted) |
### How span_id Changes at Each Hop
Only **one** `span_id` travels in the context - the sender's current span. Each node:
1. Extracts the received `span_id` and uses it as the `parent_span_id`
2. Creates a **new** `span_id` for its own span
3. Sends its own `span_id` as the parent when forwarding
```
Node A Node B Node C
────── ────── ──────
Span AAA Span BBB Span CCC
│ │ │
▼ ▼ ▼
Context out: Context out: Context out:
├─ trace_id: abc123 ├─ trace_id: abc123 ├─ trace_id: abc123
├─ span_id: AAA ──────────► ├─ span_id: BBB ──────────► ├─ span_id: CCC ──────►
└─ flags: 01 └─ flags: 01 └─ flags: 01
│ │
parent = AAA parent = BBB
```
The `trace_id` stays constant, but `span_id` **changes at every hop** to maintain the parent-child chain.
### Propagation Formats
There are two patterns:
### HTTP/RPC Headers (W3C Trace Context)
```
traceparent: 00-4bf92f3577b34da6a3ce929d0e0e4736-00f067aa0ba902b7-01
│ │ │ │
│ │ │ └── Flags (sampled)
│ │ └── Parent span ID (16 hex)
│ └── Trace ID (32 hex)
└── Version
```
### Protocol Buffers (xrpld P2P messages)
xrpld P2P messages such as `TMTransaction` carry the trace context in two added byte fields alongside the existing payload: `trace_parent` holds the W3C traceparent (`trace_id`, `span_id`, and `trace_flags`), and `trace_state` holds the optional W3C tracestate. Together they propagate the trace across the P2P boundary so a receiving node can attach its spans to the sender's span.
---
## Sampling
Not every trace needs to be recorded. **Sampling** reduces overhead:
### Head Sampling (at trace start)
```
Request arrives → Random N% chance → Record or skip entire trace
```
- ✅ Low overhead
- ❌ May miss interesting traces
> **xrpld note**: xrpld intentionally fixes head sampling at 100% (sample
> everything) and does not expose a configurable ratio. A per-node ratio
> would let different nodes make divergent keep/drop decisions for the same
> distributed trace, producing broken/partial traces. xrpld uses a
> `ParentBased` sampler so spans with a remote parent honor the upstream
> decision. Volume reduction is delegated to collector-side tail sampling.
### Tail Sampling (after trace completes)
```
Trace completes → Collector evaluates:
- Error? → KEEP
- Slow? → KEEP
- Normal? → Sample 10%
```
- ✅ Never loses important traces
- ❌ Higher memory usage at collector
---
## Key Benefits for xrpld
| Challenge | How Tracing Helps |
| ---------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------- |
| "Where is my transaction?" | Follow trace across all nodes it touched |
| "Why was consensus slow?" | See timing breakdown of each phase |
| "Which node is the bottleneck?" | Compare span durations across nodes |
| "What happened during the outage?" | Correlate errors across the network |
---
## Glossary
| Term | Definition |
| -------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| **Trace** | Complete journey of a request, identified by `trace_id` |
| **Span** | Single operation within a trace |
| **Parent-Child** | Span relationship where the parent depends on the child |
| **Follows-From** | Causal relationship where originator doesn't wait for the result |
| **Span Link** | Non-hierarchical connection between spans, possibly across traces |
| **Deterministic ID** | Trace ID derived from domain data (e.g., tx_hash) instead of random |
| **Context** | Data propagated between services (`trace_id`, `span_id`, flags) |
| **Instrumentation** | Code that creates spans and propagates context |
| **Collector** | Service that receives, processes, and exports traces |
| **Backend** | Storage/visualization system (Tempo) |
| **Head Sampling** | Sampling decision at trace start |
| **Tail Sampling** | Sampling decision after trace completes |
---
_Next: [Architecture Analysis](./01-architecture-analysis.md)_ | _Back to: [Overview](./OpenTelemetryPlan.md)_

View File

@@ -1,467 +0,0 @@
# Architecture Analysis
> **Parent Document**: [OpenTelemetryPlan.md](./OpenTelemetryPlan.md)
> **Related**: [Design Decisions](./02-design-decisions.md) | [Implementation Strategy](./03-implementation-strategy.md)
---
## 1.1 Current xrpld Architecture Overview
> **WS** = WebSocket | **UNL** = Unique Node List | **TxQ** = Transaction Queue | **StatsD** = Statistics Daemon
The xrpld node software consists of several interconnected components that need instrumentation for distributed tracing:
```mermaid
flowchart TB
subgraph xrpld["xrpld Node"]
subgraph services["Core Services"]
RPC["RPC Server<br/>(HTTP/WS/gRPC)"]
Overlay["Overlay<br/>(P2P Network)"]
Consensus["Consensus<br/>(RCLConsensus)"]
ValidatorList["ValidatorList<br/>(UNL Mgmt)"]
end
JobQueue["JobQueue<br/>(Thread Pool)"]
subgraph processing["Processing Layer"]
NetworkOPs["NetworkOPs<br/>(Tx Processing)"]
LedgerMaster["LedgerMaster<br/>(Ledger Mgmt)"]
NodeStore["NodeStore<br/>(Database)"]
InboundLedgers["InboundLedgers<br/>(Ledger Sync)"]
end
subgraph appservices["Application Services"]
PathFind["PathFinding<br/>(Payment Paths)"]
TxQ["TxQ<br/>(Fee Escalation)"]
LoadMgr["LoadManager<br/>(Fee/Load)"]
end
subgraph observability["Existing Observability"]
PerfLog["PerfLog<br/>(JSON)"]
Insight["Insight<br/>(StatsD)"]
Logging["Logging<br/>(Journal)"]
end
services --> JobQueue
JobQueue --> processing
JobQueue --> appservices
end
style xrpld fill:#424242,stroke:#212121,color:#ffffff
style services fill:#1565c0,stroke:#0d47a1,color:#ffffff
style processing fill:#2e7d32,stroke:#1b5e20,color:#ffffff
style appservices fill:#6a1b9a,stroke:#4a148c,color:#ffffff
style observability fill:#e65100,stroke:#bf360c,color:#ffffff
```
**Reading the diagram:**
- **Core Services (blue)**: The entry points into xrpld -- RPC Server handles client requests, Overlay manages peer-to-peer networking, Consensus drives agreement, and ValidatorList manages trusted validators.
- **JobQueue (center)**: The asynchronous thread pool that decouples Core Services from the Processing and Application layers. All work flows through it.
- **Processing Layer (green)**: Core business logic -- NetworkOPs processes transactions, LedgerMaster manages ledger state, NodeStore handles persistence, and InboundLedgers synchronizes missing data.
- **Application Services (purple)**: Higher-level features -- PathFinding computes payment routes, TxQ manages fee-based queuing, and LoadManager tracks server load.
- **Existing Observability (orange)**: The current monitoring stack (PerfLog, Insight, Journal logging) that OpenTelemetry will complement, not replace.
- **Arrows (Services to JobQueue to layers)**: Work originates at Core Services, is enqueued onto the JobQueue, and dispatched to Processing or Application layers for execution.
---
## 1.1.1 Actors and Actions
### Actors
| Who (Plain English) | Technical Term |
| ----------------------------------------- | -------------------------- |
| Network node running XRPL software | xrpld node |
| External client submitting requests | RPC Client |
| Network neighbor sharing data | Peer (PeerImp) |
| Request handler for client queries | RPC Server (ServerHandler) |
| Command executor for specific RPC methods | RPCHandler |
| Agreement process between nodes | Consensus (RCLConsensus) |
| Transaction processing coordinator | NetworkOPs |
| Background task scheduler | JobQueue |
| Ledger state manager | LedgerMaster |
| Payment route calculator | PathFinding (Pathfinder) |
| Transaction waiting room | TxQ (Transaction Queue) |
| Fee adjustment system | LoadManager |
| Trusted validator list manager | ValidatorList |
| Protocol upgrade tracker | AmendmentTable |
| Ledger state hash tree | SHAMap |
| Persistent key-value storage | NodeStore |
### Actions
| What Happens (Plain English) | Technical Term |
| ---------------------------------------------- | ---------------------- |
| Client sends a request to a node | `rpc.request` |
| Node executes a specific RPC command | `rpc.command.*` |
| Node receives a transaction from a peer | `tx.receive` |
| Node checks if a transaction is valid | `tx.validate` |
| Node forwards a transaction to neighbors | `tx.relay` |
| Nodes agree on which transactions to include | `consensus.round` |
| Consensus progresses through phases | `consensus.phase.*` |
| Node builds a new confirmed ledger | `ledger.build` |
| Node fetches missing ledger data from peers | `ledger.acquire` |
| Node computes payment routes | `pathfind.compute` |
| Node queues a transaction for later processing | `txq.enqueue` |
| Node increases fees due to high load | `fee.escalate` |
| Node fetches the latest trusted validator list | `validator.list.fetch` |
| Node votes on a protocol amendment | `amendment.vote` |
| Node synchronizes state tree data | `shamap.sync` |
---
## 1.2 Key Components for Instrumentation
> **TxQ** = Transaction Queue | **UNL** = Unique Node List
| Component | Location | Purpose | Trace Value |
| ------------------ | ------------------------------------------ | ------------------------ | -------------------------------- |
| **Overlay** | `src/xrpld/overlay/` | P2P communication | Message propagation timing |
| **PeerImp** | `src/xrpld/overlay/detail/PeerImp.cpp` | Individual peer handling | Per-peer latency |
| **RCLConsensus** | `src/xrpld/app/consensus/RCLConsensus.cpp` | Consensus algorithm | Round timing, phase analysis |
| **NetworkOPs** | `src/xrpld/app/misc/NetworkOPs.cpp` | Transaction processing | Tx lifecycle tracking |
| **ServerHandler** | `src/xrpld/rpc/detail/ServerHandler.cpp` | RPC entry point | Request latency |
| **RPCHandler** | `src/xrpld/rpc/detail/RPCHandler.cpp` | Command execution | Per-command timing |
| **JobQueue** | `src/xrpl/core/JobQueue.h` | Async task execution | Queue wait times |
| **PathFinding** | `src/xrpld/app/paths/` | Payment path computation | Path latency, cache hits |
| **TxQ** | `src/xrpld/app/misc/TxQ.cpp` | Transaction queue/fees | Queue depth, eviction rates |
| **LoadManager** | `src/xrpld/app/main/LoadManager.cpp` | Fee escalation/load | Fee levels, load factors |
| **InboundLedgers** | `src/xrpld/app/ledger/InboundLedgers.cpp` | Ledger acquisition | Sync time, peer reliability |
| **ValidatorList** | `src/xrpld/app/misc/ValidatorList.cpp` | UNL management | List freshness, fetch failures |
| **AmendmentTable** | `src/xrpld/app/misc/AmendmentTable.cpp` | Protocol amendments | Voting status, activation events |
| **SHAMap** | `src/xrpld/shamap/` | State hash tree | Sync speed, missing nodes |
---
## 1.3 Transaction Flow Diagram
Transaction flow spans multiple nodes in the network. Each node creates linked spans to form a distributed trace:
```mermaid
sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant PeerA as Peer A (Receive)
participant PeerB as Peer B (Relay)
participant PeerC as Peer C (Validate)
Client->>PeerA: 1. Submit TX
rect rgb(230, 245, 255)
Note over PeerA: tx.receive SPAN START
PeerA->>PeerA: HashRouter Deduplication
PeerA->>PeerA: tx.validate (child span)
end
PeerA->>PeerB: 2. Relay TX (with trace ctx)
rect rgb(230, 245, 255)
Note over PeerB: tx.receive (linked span)
end
PeerB->>PeerC: 3. Relay TX
rect rgb(230, 245, 255)
Note over PeerC: tx.receive (linked span)
PeerC->>PeerC: tx.process
end
Note over Client,PeerC: DISTRIBUTED TRACE (same trace_id: abc123)
```
**Reading the diagram:**
- **Client**: The external entity that submits a transaction to Peer A. It has no trace context -- the trace starts at the first node.
- **Peer A (Receive)**: The entry node that creates the root span `tx.receive`, runs HashRouter deduplication to avoid processing duplicates, and creates a child `tx.validate` span.
- **Peer A to Peer B arrow**: The relay message carries trace context (trace_id + parent span_id), enabling Peer B to create a linked span under the same trace.
- **Peer B (Relay)**: Receives the transaction and trace context, creates a `tx.receive` span linked to Peer A's trace, then relays onward.
- **Peer C (Validate)**: Final hop in this example. Creates a linked `tx.receive` span and runs `tx.process` to fully process the transaction.
- **Blue rectangles**: Highlight the span boundaries on each node, showing where instrumentation creates and closes spans.
### Trace Structure
```
trace_id: abc123
├── span: tx.receive (Peer A)
│ ├── span: tx.validate
│ └── span: tx.relay
├── span: tx.receive (Peer B) [parent: Peer A]
│ └── span: tx.relay
└── span: tx.receive (Peer C) [parent: Peer B]
└── span: tx.process
```
---
## 1.4 Consensus Round Flow
Consensus rounds are multi-phase operations that benefit significantly from tracing:
```mermaid
flowchart TB
subgraph round["consensus.round (root span)"]
attrs["Attributes:<br/>ledger_seq = 12345678<br/>consensus_mode = proposing<br/>proposers = 35"]
subgraph open["consensus.phase.open"]
open_desc["Duration: ~3s<br/>Waiting for transactions"]
end
subgraph establish["consensus.phase.establish"]
est_attrs["proposals_received = 28<br/>disputes_resolved = 3"]
est_children["├── consensus.proposal.receive (×28)<br/>├── consensus.proposal.send (×1)<br/>└── consensus.dispute.resolve (×3)"]
end
subgraph accept["consensus.phase.accept"]
acc_attrs["transactions_applied = 150<br/>ledger_hash = DEF456..."]
acc_children["├── ledger.build<br/>└── ledger.validate"]
end
attrs --> open
open --> establish
establish --> accept
end
style round fill:#f57f17,stroke:#e65100,color:#ffffff
style open fill:#1565c0,stroke:#0d47a1,color:#ffffff
style establish fill:#2e7d32,stroke:#1b5e20,color:#ffffff
style accept fill:#c2185b,stroke:#880e4f,color:#ffffff
```
**Reading the diagram:**
- **consensus.round (orange, root span)**: The top-level span encompassing the entire consensus round, with attributes like ledger sequence, mode, and proposer count.
- **consensus.phase.open (blue)**: The first phase where the node waits (~3s) to collect incoming transactions before proposing.
- **consensus.phase.establish (green)**: The negotiation phase where validators exchange proposals, resolve disputes, and converge on a transaction set. Child spans track each proposal received/sent and each dispute resolved.
- **consensus.phase.accept (pink)**: The final phase where the agreed transaction set is applied, a new ledger is built, and the ledger is validated. Child spans cover `ledger.build` and `ledger.validate`.
- **Arrows (open to establish to accept)**: The sequential flow through the three consensus phases. Each phase must complete before the next begins.
---
## 1.5 RPC Request Flow
> **WS** = WebSocket
RPC requests support W3C Trace Context headers for distributed tracing across services:
```mermaid
flowchart TB
subgraph request["rpc.request (root span)"]
http["HTTP Request — POST /<br/>traceparent:<br/>00-abc123...-def456...-01"]
attrs["Attributes:<br/>http.method = POST<br/>net.peer.ip = 192.168.1.100<br/>command = submit"]
subgraph enqueue["jobqueue.enqueue"]
job_attr["job_type = jtCLIENT_RPC"]
end
subgraph command["rpc.command.submit"]
cmd_attrs["version = 2<br/>rpc_role = user"]
cmd_children["├── tx.deserialize<br/>├── tx.validate_local<br/>└── tx.submit_to_network"]
end
response["Response: 200 OK<br/>Duration: 45ms"]
http --> attrs
attrs --> enqueue
enqueue --> command
command --> response
end
style request fill:#2e7d32,stroke:#1b5e20,color:#ffffff
style enqueue fill:#1565c0,stroke:#0d47a1,color:#ffffff
style command fill:#e65100,stroke:#bf360c,color:#ffffff
```
**Reading the diagram:**
- **rpc.request (green, root span)**: The outermost span representing the full RPC request lifecycle, from HTTP receipt to response. Carries the W3C `traceparent` header for distributed tracing.
- **HTTP Request node**: Shows the incoming POST request with its `traceparent` header and extracted attributes (method, peer IP, command name).
- **jobqueue.enqueue (blue)**: The span covering the asynchronous handoff from the RPC thread to the JobQueue worker thread. The trace context is preserved across this async boundary.
- **rpc.command.submit (orange)**: The span for the actual command execution, with child spans for deserialization, local validation, and network submission.
- **Response node**: The final output with HTTP status and total duration, marking the end of the root span.
- **Arrows (top to bottom)**: The sequential processing pipeline -- receive request, extract attributes, enqueue job, execute command, return response.
---
## 1.6 Key Trace Points
> **TxQ** = Transaction Queue
The following table identifies priority instrumentation points across the codebase:
| Category | Span Name | File | Method | Priority |
| --------------- | ---------------------- | ---------------------- | ----------------------- | -------- |
| **Transaction** | `tx.receive` | `PeerImp.cpp` | `handleTransaction()` | High |
| **Transaction** | `tx.validate` | `NetworkOPs.cpp` | `processTransaction()` | High |
| **Transaction** | `tx.process` | `NetworkOPs.cpp` | `doTransactionSync()` | High |
| **Transaction** | `tx.relay` | `OverlayImpl.cpp` | `relay()` | Medium |
| **Consensus** | `consensus.round` | `RCLConsensus.cpp` | `startRound()` | High |
| **Consensus** | `consensus.phase.*` | `Consensus.h` | `timerEntry()` | High |
| **Consensus** | `consensus.proposal.*` | `RCLConsensus.cpp` | `peerProposal()` | Medium |
| **RPC** | `rpc.request` | `ServerHandler.cpp` | `onRequest()` | High |
| **RPC** | `rpc.command.*` | `RPCHandler.cpp` | `doCommand()` | High |
| **Peer** | `peer.connect` | `OverlayImpl.cpp` | `onHandoff()` | Low |
| **Peer** | `peer.message.*` | `PeerImp.cpp` | `onMessage()` | Low |
| **Ledger** | `ledger.acquire` | `InboundLedgers.cpp` | `acquire()` | Medium |
| **Ledger** | `ledger.build` | `RCLConsensus.cpp` | `buildLCL()` | High |
| **PathFinding** | `pathfind.request` | `PathRequest.cpp` | `doUpdate()` | High |
| **PathFinding** | `pathfind.compute` | `Pathfinder.cpp` | `findPaths()` | High |
| **TxQ** | `txq.enqueue` | `TxQ.cpp` | `apply()` | High |
| **TxQ** | `txq.apply` | `TxQ.cpp` | `processClosedLedger()` | High |
| **Fee** | `fee.escalate` | `LoadManager.cpp` | `raiseLocalFee()` | Medium |
| **Ledger** | `ledger.replay` | `LedgerReplayer.h` | `replay()` | Medium |
| **Ledger** | `ledger.delta` | `LedgerDeltaAcquire.h` | `processData()` | Medium |
| **Validator** | `validator.list.fetch` | `ValidatorList.cpp` | `verify()` | Medium |
| **Validator** | `validator.manifest` | `Manifest.cpp` | `applyManifest()` | Low |
| **Amendment** | `amendment.vote` | `AmendmentTable.cpp` | `doVoting()` | Low |
| **SHAMap** | `shamap.sync` | `SHAMap.cpp` | `fetchRoot()` | Medium |
---
## 1.7 Instrumentation Priority
> **TxQ** = Transaction Queue
```mermaid
quadrantChart
title Instrumentation Priority Matrix
x-axis Low Complexity --> High Complexity
y-axis Low Value --> High Value
quadrant-1 Implement First
quadrant-2 Plan Carefully
quadrant-3 Quick Wins
quadrant-4 Consider Later
RPC Tracing: [0.2, 0.92]
Transaction Tracing: [0.55, 0.88]
Consensus Tracing: [0.78, 0.82]
PathFinding: [0.38, 0.75]
TxQ and Fees: [0.25, 0.65]
Ledger Sync: [0.62, 0.58]
Peer Message Tracing: [0.35, 0.25]
JobQueue Tracing: [0.2, 0.48]
Validator Mgmt: [0.48, 0.42]
Amendment Tracking: [0.15, 0.32]
SHAMap Operations: [0.72, 0.45]
```
---
## 1.8 Observable Outcomes
> **TxQ** = Transaction Queue | **UNL** = Unique Node List
After implementing OpenTelemetry, operators and developers will gain visibility into the following:
### 1.8.1 What You Will See: Traces
| Trace Type | Description | Example Query in Grafana/Tempo |
| -------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------- |
| **Transaction Lifecycle** | Full journey from RPC submission through validation, relay, consensus, and ledger inclusion | `{service.name="xrpld" && tx_hash="ABC123..."}` |
| **Cross-Node Propagation** | Transaction path across multiple xrpld nodes with timing | `{relay_count > 0}` |
| **Consensus Rounds** | Complete round with all phases (open, establish, accept) | `{span.name=~"consensus.round.*"}` |
| **RPC Request Processing** | Individual command execution with timing breakdown | `{command="account_info"}` |
| **Ledger Acquisition** | Peer-to-peer ledger data requests and responses | `{span.name="ledger.acquire"}` |
| **PathFinding Latency** | Path computation time and cache effectiveness for payment RPCs | `{span.name="pathfind.compute"}` |
| **TxQ Behavior** | Queue depth, eviction patterns, fee escalation during congestion | `{span.name=~"txq.*"}` |
| **Ledger Sync** | Full acquisition timeline including delta and transaction fetches | `{span.name=~"ledger.acquire.*"}` |
| **Validator Health** | UNL fetch success, manifest updates, stale list detection | `{span.name=~"validator.*"}` |
### 1.8.2 What You Will See: Metrics (Derived from Traces)
| Metric | Description | Dashboard Panel |
| ----------------------------- | --------------------------------------- | --------------------------- |
| **RPC Latency (p50/p95/p99)** | Response time distribution per command | Heatmap by command |
| **Transaction Throughput** | Transactions processed per second | Time series graph |
| **Consensus Round Duration** | Time to complete consensus phases | Histogram |
| **Cross-Node Latency** | Time for transaction to reach N nodes | Line chart with percentiles |
| **Error Rate** | Failed transactions/RPC calls by type | Stacked bar chart |
| **PathFinding Latency** | Path computation time per currency pair | Heatmap by currency |
| **TxQ Depth** | Queued transactions over time | Time series with thresholds |
| **Fee Escalation Level** | Current fee multiplier | Gauge with alert thresholds |
| **Ledger Sync Duration** | Time to acquire missing ledgers | Histogram |
### 1.8.3 Concrete Dashboard Examples
**Transaction Trace View (Tempo):**
```
┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Trace: abc123... (Transaction Submission) Duration: 847ms │
├────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ ├── rpc.request [ServerHandler] ████░░░░░░ 45ms │
│ │ └── rpc.command.submit [RPCHandler] ████░░░░░░ 42ms │
│ │ └── tx.receive [NetworkOPs] ███░░░░░░░ 35ms │
│ │ ├── tx.validate [TxQ] █░░░░░░░░░ 8ms │
│ │ └── tx.relay [Overlay] ██░░░░░░░░ 15ms │
│ │ ├── tx.receive [Node-B] █████░░░░░ 52ms │
│ │ │ └── tx.relay [Node-B] ██░░░░░░░░ 18ms │
│ │ └── tx.receive [Node-C] ██████░░░░ 65ms │
│ └── consensus.round [RCLConsensus] ████████░░ 720ms │
│ ├── consensus.phase.open ██░░░░░░░░ 180ms │
│ ├── consensus.phase.establish █████░░░░░ 480ms │
│ └── consensus.phase.accept █░░░░░░░░░ 60ms │
└────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
```
**RPC Performance Dashboard Panel:**
```
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ RPC Command Latency (Last 1 Hour) │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Command │ p50 │ p95 │ p99 │ Errors │ Rate │
│──────────────────┼────────┼────────┼────────┼────────┼──────│
│ account_info │ 12ms │ 45ms │ 89ms │ 0.1% │ 150/s│
│ submit │ 35ms │ 120ms │ 250ms │ 2.3% │ 45/s│
│ ledger │ 8ms │ 25ms │ 55ms │ 0.0% │ 80/s│
│ tx │ 15ms │ 50ms │ 100ms │ 0.5% │ 60/s│
│ server_info │ 5ms │ 12ms │ 20ms │ 0.0% │ 200/s│
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
```
**Consensus Health Dashboard Panel:**
```mermaid
---
config:
xyChart:
width: 1200
height: 400
plotReservedSpacePercent: 50
chartOrientation: vertical
themeVariables:
xyChart:
plotColorPalette: "#3498db"
---
xychart-beta
title "Consensus Round Duration (Last 24 Hours)"
x-axis "Time of Day (Hours)" [0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24]
y-axis "Duration (seconds)" 1 --> 5
line [2.1, 2.4, 2.8, 3.2, 3.8, 4.3, 4.5, 5.0, 4.7, 4.0, 3.2, 2.6, 2.0]
```
### 1.8.4 Operator Actionable Insights
| Scenario | What You'll See | Action |
| ------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------ |
| **Slow RPC** | Span showing which phase is slow (parsing, execution, serialization) | Optimize specific code path |
| **Transaction Stuck** | Trace stops at validation; error attribute shows reason | Fix transaction parameters |
| **Consensus Delay** | Phase.establish taking too long; proposer attribute shows missing validators | Investigate network connectivity |
| **Memory Spike** | Large batch of spans correlating with memory increase | Tune batch_size or sampling |
| **Network Partition** | Traces missing cross-node links for specific peer | Check peer connectivity |
| **Path Computation Slow** | pathfind.compute span shows high latency; cache miss rate in attributes | Warm the RippleLineCache, check order book depth |
| **TxQ Full** | txq.enqueue spans show evictions; fee.escalate spans increasing | Monitor fee levels, alert operators |
| **Ledger Sync Stalled** | ledger.acquire spans timing out; peer reliability attributes show issues | Check peer connectivity, add trusted peers |
| **UNL Stale** | validator.list.fetch spans failing; last_update attribute aging | Verify validator site URLs, check DNS |
### 1.8.5 Developer Debugging Workflow
1. **Find Transaction**: Query by `tx_hash` to get full trace
2. **Identify Bottleneck**: Look at span durations to find slowest component
3. **Check Attributes**: Review `validity`, `rpc_status` for errors
4. **Correlate Logs**: Use `trace_id` to find related PerfLog entries
5. **Compare Nodes**: Filter by `service.instance.id` to compare behavior across nodes
---
_Next: [Design Decisions](./02-design-decisions.md)_ | _Back to: [Overview](./OpenTelemetryPlan.md)_

View File

@@ -1,564 +0,0 @@
# Design Decisions
> **Parent Document**: [OpenTelemetryPlan.md](./OpenTelemetryPlan.md)
> **Related**: [Architecture Analysis](./01-architecture-analysis.md)
---
## 2.1 OpenTelemetry Components
> **OTLP** = OpenTelemetry Protocol
### 2.1.1 SDK Selection
**Primary Choice**: OpenTelemetry C++ SDK (`opentelemetry-cpp`)
| Component | Purpose | Required |
| --------------------------------------- | ---------------------- | ------------------------- |
| `opentelemetry-cpp::api` | Tracing API headers | Yes |
| `opentelemetry-cpp::sdk` | SDK implementation | Yes |
| `opentelemetry-cpp::ext` | Extensions (exporters) | Yes |
| `opentelemetry-cpp::otlp_http_exporter` | OTLP/HTTP export | Yes (shipped in Phase 1b) |
| `opentelemetry-cpp::otlp_grpc_exporter` | OTLP/gRPC export | Future (not yet wired up) |
### 2.1.2 Instrumentation Strategy
**Manual Instrumentation** (recommended):
| Approach | Pros | Cons |
| ---------- | --------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------- |
| **Manual** | Precise control, optimized placement, xrpld-specific attributes | More development effort |
| **Auto** | Less code, automatic coverage | Less control, potential overhead, limited customization |
---
## 2.2 Exporter Configuration
> **OTLP** = OpenTelemetry Protocol
```mermaid
flowchart TB
subgraph nodes["xrpld Nodes"]
node1["xrpld<br/>Node 1"]
node2["xrpld<br/>Node 2"]
node3["xrpld<br/>Node 3"]
end
collector["OpenTelemetry<br/>Collector<br/>(sidecar or standalone)"]
subgraph backends["Observability Backends"]
tempo["Tempo"]
elastic["Elastic<br/>APM"]
end
node1 -->|"OTLP/HTTP<br/>:4318"| collector
node2 -->|"OTLP/HTTP<br/>:4318"| collector
node3 -->|"OTLP/HTTP<br/>:4318"| collector
collector --> tempo
collector --> elastic
style nodes fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#ffffff
style backends fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#ffffff
style collector fill:#bf360c,stroke:#8c2809,color:#ffffff
```
**Reading the diagram:**
- **xrpld Nodes (blue)**: The source of telemetry data. Each xrpld node exports spans via OTLP/HTTP on port 4318 (the only exporter shipped in Phase 1b).
- **OpenTelemetry Collector (red)**: The central aggregation point that receives spans from all nodes. Can run as a sidecar (per-node) or standalone (shared). Handles batching, filtering, and routing.
- **Observability Backends (green)**: The storage and visualization destinations. Tempo is the recommended backend for both development and production, and Elastic APM is an alternative. The Collector routes to one or more backends.
- **Arrows (nodes to collector to backends)**: The data pipeline -- spans flow from nodes to the Collector over HTTP, then the Collector fans out to the configured backends.
### 2.2.1 OTLP/HTTP (Shipped in Phase 1b)
OTLP/HTTP is the only exporter wired up in Phase 1b. It is configured via
`OtlpHttpExporterOptions` with the collector traces endpoint
(`http://localhost:4318/v1/traces` by default) and a JSON content type
(binary protobuf is also available).
### 2.2.2 OTLP/gRPC (Future Work — Planned Upgrade)
OTLP/gRPC is planned as a future upgrade from the HTTP exporter. The gRPC
transport offers lower per-span overhead and tighter back-pressure semantics
than HTTP/JSON, making it attractive for production deployments once the HTTP
path is validated in earlier phases.
Required to land this upgrade:
1. Add `opentelemetry-cpp::otlp_grpc_exporter` to the Conan recipe (the
dependency already exists but is not linked in Phase 1b builds).
2. Extend `TelemetryConfig.cpp` to parse an `exporter` key (`otlp_http`
default, `otlp_grpc` opt-in) and a gRPC endpoint override.
3. In `Telemetry::start()` branch on the parsed exporter type and construct
either `OtlpHttpExporterFactory::Create(httpOpts)` or
`OtlpGrpcExporterFactory::Create(grpcOpts)` accordingly.
4. Update the runbook and dashboards to document the alternate port and TLS
settings.
When wired up, the gRPC path will use `OtlpGrpcExporterOptions` configured with
the collector endpoint (host on port 4317), TLS credentials enabled, and a CA
certificate path.
Until that work lands, `OtlpGrpcExporterOptions` is **not** used by any code
path in Phase 1b through Phase 5.
---
## 2.3 Span Naming Conventions
> **TxQ** = Transaction Queue | **UNL** = Unique Node List | **WS** = WebSocket
### 2.3.1 Naming Schema
```
<component>.<operation>[.<sub-operation>]
```
**Examples**:
- `tx.receive` - Transaction received from peer
- `consensus.phase.establish` - Consensus establish phase
- `rpc.command.server_info` - server_info RPC command
### 2.3.2 Complete Span Catalog
| Span name | Description |
| ------------------------------ | --------------------------------------- |
| `tx.receive` | Transaction received from network |
| `tx.validate` | Transaction signature/format validation |
| `tx.process` | Full transaction processing |
| `tx.relay` | Transaction relay to peers |
| `tx.apply` | Apply transaction to ledger |
| `consensus.round` | Complete consensus round |
| `consensus.phase.open` | Open phase - collecting transactions |
| `consensus.phase.establish` | Establish phase - reaching agreement |
| `consensus.phase.accept` | Accept phase - applying consensus |
| `consensus.proposal.receive` | Receive peer proposal |
| `consensus.proposal.send` | Send our proposal |
| `consensus.validation.receive` | Receive peer validation |
| `consensus.validation.send` | Send our validation |
| `rpc.request` | HTTP/WebSocket request handling |
| `rpc.command.*` | Specific RPC command (dynamic) |
| `peer.connect` | Peer connection establishment |
| `peer.disconnect` | Peer disconnection |
| `peer.message.send` | Send protocol message |
| `peer.message.receive` | Receive protocol message |
| `ledger.acquire` | Ledger acquisition from network |
| `ledger.build` | Build new ledger |
| `ledger.validate` | Ledger validation |
| `ledger.close` | Close ledger |
| `ledger.replay` | Ledger replay executed |
| `ledger.delta` | Delta-based ledger acquired |
| `pathfind.request` | Path request initiated |
| `pathfind.compute` | Path computation executed |
| `txq.enqueue` | Transaction queued |
| `txq.apply` | Queued transaction applied |
| `fee.escalate` | Fee escalation triggered |
| `validator.list.fetch` | UNL list fetched |
| `validator.manifest` | Manifest update processed |
| `amendment.vote` | Amendment voting executed |
| `shamap.sync` | State tree synchronization |
| `job.enqueue` | Job added to queue |
| `job.execute` | Job execution |
### 2.3.3 Attribute Naming Conventions
Span **names** follow §2.3.1 (dotted `<component>.<operation>`). Span
**attribute keys** follow the rules below. The constants in the `*SpanNames.h`
headers are the single source of truth; the collector, Tempo, the Grafana
dashboards, and the runbook all consume these exact keys, so every layer must
agree with the code. A CI check enforces this end to end.
1. **Per-span unique attribute** → bare field name, allowed when the field is
recorded by a single span/workflow so the span name already supplies the
domain (e.g. `command`, `version`, `local` on `rpc.command`).
2. **Shared attribute (same concept on more than one span)** → ONE key, reused
verbatim on every span that records it; the span name tells the occurrences
apart, so no per-emitter prefix is added. Name it by the field's meaning: a
property of a domain object keeps that object's bare field name (`ledger_hash`,
`ledger_seq`, `tx_hash`, `peer_id`, `full_validation`); a field already
qualified by a sub-kind keeps that qualifier on every emitter (`proposal_trusted`
on both `consensus.proposal.receive` and `peer.proposal.receive`;
`validation_trusted` likewise). Defined once in the base `SpanNames.h`
`namespace attr` block and re-exported (`using`) by each domain header.
3. **Collision qualifier**`<domain>_<field>`, only when a bare name would
collide with a DIFFERENT concept in the shared spanmetrics label space or with
the OTel-reserved `status` key (e.g. `rpc_status`, `grpc_status`,
`consensus_state`, `consensus_round`, `consensus_mode`). This disambiguates
distinct concepts that share a word; it is NOT used to tag the same concept
with its emitting workflow — that is rule 2 (one shared name).
4. **Resource attribute** → dotted `xrpl.<subsystem>.<field>`, reserved ONLY
for process/network identity set once at startup (`xrpl.network.id`,
`xrpl.network.type`). Span attributes are never dotted in the `xrpl.` form —
it blurs the resource/span scope boundary and parses awkwardly in TraceQL.
5. **Span names** use `<subsystem>[.<component>]` (dotted, per §2.3.1). Only
attribute _keys_ follow rules 14.
Standard OpenTelemetry semantic-convention keys keep their canonical dotted
form (e.g. `service.*` resource attributes, `http.*` span attributes); the
"no dotted form" rule applies to xrpl-custom keys only.
The same rules are recorded in `CONTRIBUTING.md` (the permanent home, since
`OpenTelemetryPlan/` is removed once the rollout completes). The attribute
examples in §2.4 below follow these rules.
---
## 2.4 Attribute Schema
> **TxQ** = Transaction Queue | **UNL** = Unique Node List | **OTLP** = OpenTelemetry Protocol
### 2.4.1 Resource Attributes (Set Once at Startup)
Resource attributes identify the process and are set once at startup. They use
the standard OpenTelemetry semantic conventions plus custom dotted `xrpl.*`
keys (the dotted form is reserved for resource scope per §2.3.3).
| Key | Type / value | Description |
| --------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------ |
| `service.name` | `"xrpld"` | Standard `SERVICE_NAME` |
| `service.version` | `BuildInfo::getVersionString()` | Standard `SERVICE_VERSION` |
| `service.instance.id` | node public key (base58) | Standard `SERVICE_INSTANCE_ID` |
| `xrpl.network.id` | network id (e.g. 0 for mainnet) | Network identifier |
| `xrpl.network.type` | `"mainnet"` \| `"testnet"` \| `"devnet"` \| `"standalone"` | Network kind |
| `xrpl.node.type` | `"validator"` \| `"stock"` \| `"reporting"` | Node role |
| `xrpl.node.cluster` | cluster name | Cluster name, if clustered |
### 2.4.2 Span Attributes by Category
> Span attribute keys use the underscore form from §2.3.3 (shared/qualified
> keys are `<domain>_<field>`; per-span unique keys are bare). The dotted form
> is reserved for the resource attributes in §2.4.1 above. This catalog lists
> the planned attribute set by category; the exact emitted key for each
> implemented span is defined by the `*SpanNames.h` constants, which are the
> single source of truth where the two differ.
#### Transaction Attributes
| Key | Type | Description |
| -------------- | ------ | ------------------------------------- |
| `tx_hash` | string | Transaction hash (hex) |
| `tx_type` | string | `"Payment"`, `"OfferCreate"`, etc. |
| `tx_account` | string | Source account (redacted in prod) |
| `tx_sequence` | int64 | Account sequence number |
| `tx_fee` | int64 | Fee in drops |
| `tx_result` | string | `"tesSUCCESS"`, `"tecPATH_DRY"`, etc. |
| `ledger_index` | int64 | Ledger containing transaction |
#### Consensus Attributes
| Key | Type | Description |
| -------------------- | ------- | ----------------------------------- |
| `consensus_round` | int64 | Round number |
| `consensus_phase` | string | `"open"`, `"establish"`, `"accept"` |
| `consensus_mode` | string | `"proposing"`, `"observing"`, etc. |
| `proposers` | int64 | Number of proposers |
| `prev_ledger_prefix` | string | Previous ledger hash prefix |
| `ledger_seq` | int64 | Ledger sequence |
| `tx_count` | int64 | Transactions in consensus set |
| `round_time_ms` | float64 | Round duration |
#### RPC Attributes
| Key | Type | Description |
| ---------- | ------ | ----------------------------------------------------- |
| `command` | string | Command name (per-span unique on `rpc.command`) |
| `version` | int64 | API version |
| `rpc_role` | string | `"admin"` or `"user"` (qualified — `role` is generic) |
| `params` | string | Sanitized parameters (optional) |
#### Peer & Message Attributes
| Key | Type | Description |
| -------------------- | ------- | -------------------------- |
| `peer_id` | string | Peer public key (base58) |
| `peer_address` | string | IP:port |
| `peer_latency_ms` | float64 | Measured latency |
| `peer_cluster` | string | Cluster name if clustered |
| `message_type` | string | Protocol message type name |
| `message_size_bytes` | int64 | Message size |
| `message_compressed` | bool | Whether compressed |
#### Ledger & Job Attributes
| Key | Type | Description |
| ----------------- | ------- | --------------------- |
| `ledger_hash` | string | Ledger hash |
| `ledger_index` | int64 | Ledger sequence/index |
| `close_time` | int64 | Close time (epoch) |
| `ledger_tx_count` | int64 | Transaction count |
| `job_type` | string | Job type name |
| `job_queue_ms` | float64 | Time spent in queue |
| `job_worker` | int64 | Worker thread ID |
#### PathFinding Attributes
| Key | Type | Description |
| -------------------------- | ------ | ------------------------- |
| `pathfind_source_currency` | string | Source currency code |
| `pathfind_dest_currency` | string | Destination currency code |
| `pathfind_path_count` | int64 | Number of paths found |
| `pathfind_cache_hit` | bool | RippleLineCache hit |
#### TxQ Attributes
| Key | Type | Description |
| --------------------- | ------ | --------------------------- |
| `txq_queue_depth` | int64 | Current queue depth |
| `txq_fee_level` | int64 | Fee level of transaction |
| `txq_eviction_reason` | string | Why transaction was evicted |
#### Fee Attributes
| Key | Type | Description |
| ---------------------- | ----- | ------------------------- |
| `fee_load_factor` | int64 | Current load factor |
| `fee_escalation_level` | int64 | Fee escalation multiplier |
#### Validator Attributes
| Key | Type | Description |
| ------------------------ | ----- | ------------------------- |
| `validator_list_size` | int64 | UNL size |
| `validator_list_age_sec` | int64 | Seconds since last update |
#### Amendment Attributes
| Key | Type | Description |
| ------------------ | ------ | -------------------------------------- |
| `amendment_name` | string | Amendment name |
| `amendment_status` | string | `"enabled"`, `"vetoed"`, `"supported"` |
#### SHAMap Attributes
| Key | Type | Description |
| ---------------------- | ------- | --------------------------------------------- |
| `shamap_type` | string | `"transaction"`, `"state"`, `"account_state"` |
| `shamap_missing_nodes` | int64 | Number of missing nodes during sync |
| `shamap_duration_ms` | float64 | Sync duration |
### 2.4.3 Data Collection Summary
The following table summarizes what data is collected by category:
| Category | Attributes Collected | Purpose |
| --------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------- |
| **Transaction** | `tx_hash`, `tx_type`, `tx_result`, `tx_fee`, `ledger_index` | Trace transaction lifecycle |
| **Consensus** | `consensus_round`, `consensus_phase`, `consensus_mode`, `proposers`, `round_time_ms` | Analyze consensus timing |
| **RPC** | `command`, `version`, `rpc_status`, `duration_ms` | Monitor RPC performance |
| **Peer** | `peer_id` (public key), `peer_latency_ms`, `message_type`, `message_size_bytes` | Network topology analysis |
| **Ledger** | `ledger_hash`, `ledger_index`, `close_time`, `ledger_tx_count` | Ledger progression tracking |
| **Job** | `job_type`, `job_queue_ms`, `job_worker` | JobQueue performance |
| **PathFinding** | `pathfind_source_currency`, `pathfind_dest_currency`, `pathfind_path_count`, `pathfind_cache_hit` | Payment path analysis |
| **TxQ** | `txq_queue_depth`, `txq_fee_level`, `txq_eviction_reason` | Queue depth and fee tracking |
| **Fee** | `fee_load_factor`, `fee_escalation_level` | Fee escalation monitoring |
| **Validator** | `validator_list_size`, `validator_list_age_sec` | UNL health monitoring |
| **Amendment** | `amendment_name`, `amendment_status` | Protocol upgrade tracking |
| **SHAMap** | `shamap_type`, `shamap_missing_nodes`, `shamap_duration_ms` | State tree sync performance |
### 2.4.4 Privacy & Sensitive Data Policy
> **PII** = Personally Identifiable Information
OpenTelemetry instrumentation is designed to collect **operational metadata only**, never sensitive content.
#### Data NOT Collected
The following data is explicitly **excluded** from telemetry collection:
| Excluded Data | Reason |
| ----------------------- | ----------------------------------------- |
| **Private Keys** | Never exposed; not relevant to tracing |
| **Account Balances** | Financial data; privacy sensitive |
| **Transaction Amounts** | Financial data; privacy sensitive |
| **Raw TX Payloads** | May contain sensitive memo/data fields |
| **Personal Data** | No PII collected |
| **IP Addresses** | Configurable; excluded by default in prod |
#### Privacy Protection Mechanisms
| Mechanism | Description |
| ----------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| **Account Hashing** | `tx_account` is hashed at collector level before storage |
| **Configurable Redaction** | Sensitive fields can be excluded via `[telemetry]` config section |
| **Sampling** | Only 10% of traces recorded by default, reducing data exposure |
| **Local Control** | Node operators have full control over what gets exported |
| **No Raw Payloads** | Transaction content is never recorded, only metadata (hash, type, result) |
| **Collector-Level Filtering** | Additional redaction/hashing can be configured at OTel Collector |
#### Collector-Level Data Protection
The OpenTelemetry Collector can be configured (via an `attributes` processor)
to hash or redact sensitive attributes before export — for example, hashing
`tx_account`, deleting `peer_address` to drop IP addresses, and deleting
`params` to redact request parameters.
#### Configuration Options for Privacy
In `xrpld.cfg`, operators control data collection granularity through the
`[telemetry]` section. Besides `enabled`, per-component toggles
(`trace_transactions`, `trace_consensus`, `trace_rpc`, `trace_peer` — the last
often disabled due to high volume) select which spans are emitted, and
redaction flags (`redact_account` to hash account addresses, `redact_peer_address`
to remove peer IP addresses) control SDK-level redaction before export.
> **Note**: The `redact_account` configuration in `xrpld.cfg` controls SDK-level redaction before export, while collector-level filtering (see [Collector-Level Data Protection](#collector-level-data-protection) above) provides an additional defense-in-depth layer. Both can operate independently.
> **Key Principle**: Telemetry collects **operational metadata** (timing, counts, hashes) — never **sensitive content** (keys, balances, amounts, raw payloads).
---
## 2.5 Context Propagation Design
> **WS** = WebSocket
### 2.5.1 Propagation Boundaries
```mermaid
flowchart TB
subgraph http["HTTP/WebSocket (RPC)"]
w3c["W3C Trace Context Headers:<br/>traceparent:<br/>00-trace_id-span_id-flags<br/>tracestate: xrpld=..."]
end
subgraph protobuf["Protocol Buffers (P2P)"]
proto["message TraceContext {<br/> bytes trace_id = 1; // 16 bytes<br/> bytes span_id = 2; // 8 bytes<br/> uint32 trace_flags = 3;<br/> string trace_state = 4;<br/>}"]
end
subgraph jobqueue["JobQueue (Internal Async)"]
job["Context captured at job creation,<br/>restored at execution<br/><br/>class Job {<br/> otel::context::Context<br/> traceContext_;<br/>};"]
end
style http fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#ffffff
style protobuf fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#ffffff
style jobqueue fill:#bf360c,stroke:#8c2809,color:#ffffff
```
**Reading the diagram:**
- **HTTP/WebSocket - RPC (blue)**: For client-facing RPC requests, trace context is propagated using the W3C `traceparent` header. This is the standard approach and works with any OTel-compatible client.
- **Protocol Buffers - P2P (green)**: For peer-to-peer messages between xrpld nodes, trace context is embedded as a protobuf `TraceContext` message carrying trace_id, span_id, flags, and optional trace_state.
- **JobQueue - Internal Async (red)**: For asynchronous work within a single node, the OTel context is captured when a job is created and restored when the job executes on a worker thread. This bridges the async gap so spans remain linked.
---
## 2.6 Integration with Existing Observability
> **OTLP** = OpenTelemetry Protocol | **WS** = WebSocket
### 2.6.1 Existing Frameworks Comparison
xrpld already has two observability mechanisms. OpenTelemetry complements (not replaces) them:
| Aspect | PerfLog | Beast Insight (StatsD) | OpenTelemetry |
| --------------------- | ----------------------------- | ---------------------------- | ------------------------- |
| **Type** | Logging | Metrics | Distributed Tracing |
| **Data** | JSON log entries | Counters, gauges, histograms | Spans with context |
| **Scope** | Single node | Single node | **Cross-node** |
| **Output** | `perf.log` file | StatsD server | OTLP Collector |
| **Question answered** | "What happened on this node?" | "How many? How fast?" | "What was the journey?" |
| **Correlation** | By timestamp | By metric name | By `trace_id` |
| **Overhead** | Low (file I/O) | Low (UDP packets) | Low-Medium (configurable) |
### 2.6.2 What Each Framework Does Best
#### PerfLog
- **Purpose**: Detailed local event logging for RPC and job execution
- **Strengths**:
- Rich JSON output with timing data
- Already integrated in RPC handlers
- File-based, no external dependencies
- **Limitations**:
- Single-node only (no cross-node correlation)
- No parent-child relationships between events
- Manual log parsing required
A PerfLog entry is a JSON object with fields such as `time`, `method`,
`duration_us`, and `result`.
#### Beast Insight (StatsD)
- **Purpose**: Real-time metrics for monitoring dashboards
- **Strengths**:
- Aggregated metrics (counters, gauges, histograms)
- Low overhead (UDP, fire-and-forget)
- Good for alerting thresholds
- **Limitations**:
- No request-level detail
- No causal relationships
- Single-node perspective
In xrpld, Beast Insight is used through `increment` (counters), `gauge`
(point-in-time values), and `timing` (durations) calls.
#### OpenTelemetry (NEW)
- **Purpose**: Distributed request tracing across nodes
- **Strengths**:
- **Cross-node correlation** via `trace_id`
- Parent-child span relationships
- Rich attributes per span
- Industry standard (CNCF)
- **Limitations**:
- Requires collector infrastructure
- Higher complexity than logging
A span is created via `startSpan` (e.g. `"tx.relay"`), annotated with
attributes such as `tx_hash` and `peer_id`, and is automatically linked to its
parent through the active context.
### 2.6.3 When to Use Each
| Scenario | PerfLog | StatsD | OpenTelemetry |
| --------------------------------------- | ---------- | ------ | ------------- |
| "How many TXs per second?" | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ |
| "What's the p99 RPC latency?" | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ |
| "Why was this specific TX slow?" | ⚠️ partial | ❌ | ✅ |
| "Which node delayed consensus?" | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ |
| "What happened on node X at time T?" | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ |
| "Show me the TX journey across 5 nodes" | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ |
### 2.6.4 Coexistence Strategy
```mermaid
flowchart TB
subgraph xrpld["xrpld Process"]
perflog["PerfLog<br/>(JSON to file)"]
insight["Beast Insight<br/>(StatsD)"]
otel["OpenTelemetry<br/>(Tracing)"]
end
perflog --> perffile["perf.log"]
insight --> statsd["StatsD Server"]
otel --> collector["OTLP Collector"]
perffile --> grafana["Grafana<br/>(Unified UI)"]
statsd --> grafana
collector --> grafana
style xrpld fill:#212121,stroke:#0a0a0a,color:#ffffff
style grafana fill:#bf360c,stroke:#8c2809,color:#ffffff
```
**Reading the diagram:**
- **xrpld Process (dark gray)**: The single xrpld node running all three observability frameworks side by side. Each framework operates independently with no interference.
- **PerfLog to perf.log**: PerfLog writes JSON-formatted event logs to a local file. Grafana can ingest these via Loki or a file-based datasource.
- **Beast Insight to StatsD Server**: Insight sends aggregated metrics (counters, gauges) over UDP to a StatsD server. Grafana reads from StatsD-compatible backends like Graphite or Prometheus (via StatsD exporter).
- **OpenTelemetry to OTLP Collector**: OTel exports spans over OTLP/gRPC to a Collector, which then forwards to a trace backend (Tempo).
- **Grafana (red, unified UI)**: All three data streams converge in Grafana, enabling operators to correlate logs, metrics, and traces in a single dashboard.
### 2.6.5 Correlation with PerfLog
Trace IDs can be correlated with existing PerfLog entries for comprehensive
debugging. The design is for `RPCHandler.cpp` to start an `rpc.command.<method>`
span alongside the existing PerfLog `rpcStart`/`rpcFinish`/`rpcError` calls,
extract the span's `trace_id` (when valid), and eventually stamp it onto the
PerfLog entry (a planned `setTraceId` hook) so logs and traces share a key. The
span status is set to OK on success or to error (recording the exception) on
failure.
---
_Previous: [Architecture Analysis](./01-architecture-analysis.md)_ | _Next: [Implementation Strategy](./03-implementation-strategy.md)_ | _Back to: [Overview](./OpenTelemetryPlan.md)_

View File

@@ -1,472 +0,0 @@
# Implementation Strategy
> **Parent Document**: [OpenTelemetryPlan.md](./OpenTelemetryPlan.md)
> **Related**: [Configuration Reference](./05-configuration-reference.md)
---
## 3.1 Directory Structure
The telemetry implementation follows xrpld's existing code organization pattern:
```
include/xrpl/
├── telemetry/
│ ├── Telemetry.h # Main telemetry interface (global singleton)
│ ├── TelemetryConfig.h # Configuration structures
│ ├── TraceContext.h # Context propagation utilities
│ ├── SpanGuard.h # RAII span management with factory methods + discard()
│ ├── DiscardFlag.h # Thread-local discard flag
│ └── SpanAttributes.h # Attribute helper functions
src/libxrpl/
├── telemetry/
│ ├── Telemetry.cpp # Implementation + FilteringSpanProcessor
│ ├── TelemetryConfig.cpp # Config parsing
│ ├── TraceContext.cpp # Context serialization
│ └── NullTelemetry.cpp # No-op implementation
```
---
## 3.2 Implementation Approach
<div align="center">
```mermaid
%%{init: {'flowchart': {'nodeSpacing': 20, 'rankSpacing': 30}}}%%
flowchart TB
subgraph phase1["Phase 1: Core"]
direction LR
sdk["SDK Integration"] ~~~ interface["Telemetry Interface"] ~~~ config["Configuration"]
end
subgraph phase2["Phase 2: RPC"]
direction LR
http["HTTP Context"] ~~~ rpc["RPC Handlers"]
end
subgraph phase3["Phase 3: P2P"]
direction LR
proto["Protobuf Context"] ~~~ tx["Transaction Relay"]
end
subgraph phase4["Phase 4: Consensus"]
direction LR
consensus["Consensus Rounds"] ~~~ proposals["Proposals"]
end
phase1 --> phase2 --> phase3 --> phase4
style phase1 fill:#1565c0,stroke:#0d47a1,color:#ffffff
style phase2 fill:#2e7d32,stroke:#1b5e20,color:#ffffff
style phase3 fill:#e65100,stroke:#bf360c,color:#ffffff
style phase4 fill:#c2185b,stroke:#880e4f,color:#ffffff
```
</div>
### Key Principles
1. **Minimal Intrusion**: Instrumentation should not alter existing control flow
2. **Zero-Cost When Disabled**: Use compile-time flags and no-op implementations
3. **Backward Compatibility**: Protocol Buffer extensions use high field numbers
4. **Graceful Degradation**: Tracing failures must not affect node operation
---
## 3.3 Performance Overhead Summary
> **OTLP** = OpenTelemetry Protocol
| Metric | Overhead | Notes |
| ------------- | ---------- | ------------------------------------------------ |
| CPU | 1-3% | Of per-transaction CPU cost (~200μs baseline) |
| Memory | ~10 MB | SDK statics + batch buffer + worker thread stack |
| Network | 10-50 KB/s | Compressed OTLP export to collector |
| Latency (p99) | <2% | With proper sampling configuration |
---
## 3.4 Detailed CPU Overhead Analysis
### 3.4.1 Per-Operation Costs
> **Note on hardware assumptions**: The costs below are based on the official OTel C++ SDK CI benchmarks
> (969 runs on GitHub Actions 2-core shared runners). On production server hardware (3+ GHz Xeon),
> expect costs at the **lower end** of each range (~30-50% improvement over CI hardware).
| Operation | Time (ns) | Frequency | Impact |
| --------------------- | --------- | ---------------------- | ---------- |
| Span creation | 500-1000 | Every traced operation | Low |
| Span end | 100-200 | Every traced operation | Low |
| SetAttribute (string) | 80-120 | 3-5 per span | Low |
| SetAttribute (int) | 40-60 | 2-3 per span | Negligible |
| AddEvent | 100-200 | 0-2 per span | Low |
| Context injection | 150-250 | Per outgoing message | Low |
| Context extraction | 100-180 | Per incoming message | Low |
| GetCurrent context | 10-20 | Thread-local access | Negligible |
**Source**: Span creation based on OTel C++ SDK `BM_SpanCreation` benchmark (AlwaysOnSampler +
SimpleSpanProcessor + InMemoryExporter), median ~1,000 ns on CI hardware. AddEvent includes
timestamp read + string copy + vector push + mutex acquisition. Context injection/extraction
confirmed by `BM_SpanCreationWithScope` benchmark delta (~160 ns).
### 3.4.2 Transaction Processing Overhead
<div align="center">
```mermaid
%%{init: {'pie': {'textPosition': 0.75}}}%%
pie showData
"tx.receive (1400ns)" : 1400
"tx.validate (1200ns)" : 1200
"tx.relay (1200ns)" : 1200
"Context inject (200ns)" : 200
```
**Transaction Tracing Overhead (~4.0μs total)**
</div>
**Overhead percentage**: 4.0 μs / 200 μs (avg tx processing) = **~2.0%**
> **Breakdown**: Each span (tx.receive, tx.validate, tx.relay) costs ~1,000 ns for creation plus
> ~200-400 ns for 3-5 attribute sets. Context injection is ~200 ns (confirmed by benchmarks).
> On production hardware, expect ~2.6 μs total (~1.3% overhead) due to faster span creation (~500-600 ns).
### 3.4.3 Consensus Round Overhead
| Operation | Count | Cost (ns) | Total |
| ---------------------- | ----- | --------- | ---------- |
| consensus.round span | 1 | ~1200 | ~1.2 μs |
| consensus.phase spans | 3 | ~1100 | ~3.3 μs |
| proposal.receive spans | ~20 | ~1100 | ~22 μs |
| proposal.send spans | ~3 | ~1100 | ~3.3 μs |
| Context operations | ~30 | ~200 | ~6 μs |
| **TOTAL** | | | **~36 μs** |
> **Why higher**: Each span costs ~1,000 ns creation + ~100-200 ns for 1-2 attributes, totaling ~1,100-1,200 ns.
> Context operations remain ~200 ns (confirmed by benchmarks). On production hardware, expect ~24 μs total.
**Overhead percentage**: 36 μs / 3s (typical round) = **~0.001%** (negligible)
### 3.4.4 RPC Request Overhead
| Operation | Cost (ns) |
| ---------------- | ------------ |
| rpc.request span | ~1200 |
| rpc.command span | ~1100 |
| Context extract | ~250 |
| Context inject | ~200 |
| **TOTAL** | **~2.75 μs** |
> **Why higher**: Each span costs ~1,000 ns creation + ~100-200 ns for attributes (command name,
> version, role). Context extract/inject costs are confirmed by OTel C++ benchmarks.
- Fast RPC (1ms): 2.75 μs / 1ms = **~0.275%**
- Slow RPC (100ms): 2.75 μs / 100ms = **~0.003%**
---
## 3.5 Memory Overhead Analysis
> **OTLP** = OpenTelemetry Protocol
### 3.5.1 Static Memory
| Component | Size | Allocated |
| ------------------------------------ | ----------- | ---------- |
| TracerProvider singleton | ~64 KB | At startup |
| BatchSpanProcessor (circular buffer) | ~16 KB | At startup |
| BatchSpanProcessor (worker thread) | ~8 MB | At startup |
| OTLP exporter (gRPC channel init) | ~256 KB | At startup |
| Propagator registry | ~8 KB | At startup |
| **Total static** | **~8.3 MB** | |
> **Why higher than earlier estimate**: The BatchSpanProcessor's circular buffer itself is only ~16 KB
> (2049 x 8-byte `AtomicUniquePtr` entries), but it spawns a dedicated worker thread whose default
> stack size on Linux is ~8 MB. The OTLP gRPC exporter allocates memory for channel stubs and TLS
> initialization. The worker thread stack dominates the static footprint.
### 3.5.2 Dynamic Memory
| Component | Size per unit | Max units | Peak |
| -------------------- | -------------- | ---------- | --------------- |
| Active span | ~500-800 bytes | 1000 | ~500-800 KB |
| Queued span (export) | ~500 bytes | 2048 | ~1 MB |
| Attribute storage | ~80 bytes | 5 per span | Included |
| Context storage | ~64 bytes | Per thread | ~6.4 KB |
| **Total dynamic** | | | **~1.5-1.8 MB** |
> **Why active spans are larger**: An active `Span` object includes the wrapper (~88 bytes: shared_ptr,
> mutex, unique_ptr to Recordable) plus `SpanData` (~250 bytes: SpanContext, timestamps, name, status,
> empty containers) plus attribute storage (~200-500 bytes for 3-5 string attributes in a `std::map`).
> Source: `sdk/src/trace/span.h` and `sdk/include/opentelemetry/sdk/trace/span_data.h`.
> Queued spans release the wrapper, keeping only `SpanData` + attributes (~500 bytes).
### 3.5.3 Memory Growth Characteristics
```mermaid
---
config:
xyChart:
width: 700
height: 400
---
xychart-beta
title "Memory Usage vs Span Rate (bounded by queue limit)"
x-axis "Spans/second" [0, 200, 400, 600, 800, 1000]
y-axis "Memory (MB)" 0 --> 12
line [8.5, 9.2, 9.6, 9.9, 10.0, 10.0]
```
**Notes**:
- Memory increases with span rate but **plateaus at queue capacity** (default 2048 spans)
- Batch export prevents unbounded growth
- At queue limit, oldest spans are dropped (not blocked)
- Maximum memory is bounded: ~8.3 MB static (dominated by worker thread stack) + 2048 queued spans x ~500 bytes (~1 MB) + active spans (~0.8 MB) ≈ **~10 MB ceiling**
- The worker thread stack (~8 MB) is virtual memory; actual RSS depends on stack usage (typically much less)
### 3.5.4 Performance Data Sources
The overhead estimates in Sections 3.3-3.5 are derived from the following sources:
| Source | What it covers | URL |
| ------------------------------------------------ | ----------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
| OTel C++ SDK CI benchmarks (969 runs) | Span creation, context activation, sampler overhead | [Benchmark Dashboard](https://open-telemetry.github.io/opentelemetry-cpp/benchmarks/) |
| `api/test/trace/span_benchmark.cc` | API-level span creation (~22 ns no-op) | [Source](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-cpp/blob/main/api/test/trace/span_benchmark.cc) |
| `sdk/test/trace/sampler_benchmark.cc` | SDK span creation with samplers (~1,000 ns AlwaysOn) | [Source](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-cpp/blob/main/sdk/test/trace/sampler_benchmark.cc) |
| `sdk/include/.../span_data.h` | SpanData memory layout (~250 bytes base) | [Source](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-cpp/blob/main/sdk/include/opentelemetry/sdk/trace/span_data.h) |
| `sdk/src/trace/span.h` | Span wrapper memory layout (~88 bytes) | [Source](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-cpp/blob/main/sdk/src/trace/span.h) |
| `sdk/include/.../batch_span_processor_options.h` | Default queue size (2048), batch size (512) | [Source](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-cpp/blob/main/sdk/include/opentelemetry/sdk/trace/batch_span_processor_options.h) |
| `sdk/include/.../circular_buffer.h` | CircularBuffer implementation (AtomicUniquePtr array) | [Source](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-cpp/blob/main/sdk/include/opentelemetry/sdk/common/circular_buffer.h) |
| OTLP proto definition | Serialized span size estimation | [Proto](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-proto/blob/main/opentelemetry/proto/trace/v1/trace.proto) |
---
## 3.6 Network Overhead Analysis
### 3.6.1 Export Bandwidth
> **Bytes per span**: Estimates use ~500 bytes/span (conservative upper bound). OTLP protobuf analysis
> shows a typical span with 3-5 string attributes serializes to ~200-300 bytes raw; with gzip
> compression (~60-70% of raw) and batching (amortized headers), ~350 bytes/span is more realistic.
> The table uses the conservative estimate for capacity planning.
| Sampling Rate | Spans/sec | Bandwidth | Notes |
| ------------- | --------- | --------- | ---------------- |
| 100% | ~500 | ~250 KB/s | Development only |
| 10% | ~50 | ~25 KB/s | Staging |
| 1% | ~5 | ~2.5 KB/s | Production |
| Error-only | ~1 | ~0.5 KB/s | Minimal overhead |
### 3.6.2 Trace Context Propagation
| Message Type | Context Size | Messages/sec | Overhead |
| ---------------------- | ------------ | ------------ | ----------- |
| TMTransaction | 25 bytes | ~100 | ~2.5 KB/s |
| TMProposeSet | 25 bytes | ~10 | ~250 B/s |
| TMValidation | 25 bytes | ~50 | ~1.25 KB/s |
| **Total P2P overhead** | | | **~4 KB/s** |
---
## 3.7 Optimization Strategies
### 3.7.1 Sampling Strategies
#### Tail Sampling
```mermaid
flowchart TD
trace["New Trace"]
trace --> errors{"Is Error?"}
errors -->|Yes| sample["SAMPLE"]
errors -->|No| consensus{"Is Consensus?"}
consensus -->|Yes| sample
consensus -->|No| slow{"Is Slow?"}
slow -->|Yes| sample
slow -->|No| prob{"Random < 10%?"}
prob -->|Yes| sample
prob -->|No| drop["DROP"]
style sample fill:#4caf50,stroke:#388e3c,color:#fff
style drop fill:#f44336,stroke:#c62828,color:#fff
```
### 3.7.2 Batch Tuning Recommendations
| Environment | Batch Size | Batch Delay | Max Queue |
| ------------------ | ---------- | ----------- | --------- |
| Low-latency | 128 | 1000ms | 512 |
| High-throughput | 1024 | 10000ms | 8192 |
| Memory-constrained | 256 | 2000ms | 512 |
### 3.7.3 Conditional Instrumentation
Instrumentation is gated on two levels. A compile-time feature flag (`XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY`) reduces the trace macros to no-ops when telemetry is built out, so disabled builds carry zero cost. At runtime, per-component guards (e.g. `shouldTracePeer()`) skip span creation for components whose tracing is turned off, incurring no overhead beyond a single boolean check.
---
## 3.8 Links to Detailed Documentation
- **[Configuration Reference](./05-configuration-reference.md)**: Configuration options and collector setup
- **[Implementation Phases](./06-implementation-phases.md)**: Detailed timeline and milestones
---
## 3.9 Code Intrusiveness Assessment
> **TxQ** = Transaction Queue
This section provides a detailed assessment of how intrusive the OpenTelemetry integration is to the existing xrpld codebase.
### 3.9.1 Files Modified Summary
| Component | Files Modified | Lines Added | Lines Changed | Architectural Impact |
| --------------------- | -------------- | ----------- | ------------- | -------------------- |
| **Core Telemetry** | 7 new files | ~800 | 0 | None (new module) |
| **Application Init** | 2 files | ~30 | ~5 | Minimal |
| **RPC Layer** | 3 files | ~80 | ~20 | Minimal |
| **Transaction Relay** | 4 files | ~120 | ~40 | Low |
| **Consensus** | 3 files | ~100 | ~30 | Low-Medium |
| **Protocol Buffers** | 1 file | ~25 | 0 | Low |
| **CMake/Build** | 3 files | ~50 | ~10 | Minimal |
| **PathFinding** | 2 | ~80 | ~5 | Minimal |
| **TxQ/Fee** | 2 | ~60 | ~5 | Minimal |
| **Validator/Amend** | 3 | ~40 | ~5 | Minimal |
| **Total** | **~27 files** | **~1,490** | **~120** | **Low** |
### 3.9.2 Detailed File Impact
```mermaid
pie title Code Changes by Component
"New Telemetry Module" : 800
"Transaction Relay" : 160
"Consensus" : 130
"RPC Layer" : 100
"PathFinding" : 80
"TxQ/Fee" : 60
"Validator/Amendment" : 40
"Application Init" : 35
"Protocol Buffers" : 25
"Build System" : 60
```
#### New Files (No Impact on Existing Code)
| File | Lines | Purpose |
| ------------------------------------------- | ----- | ----------------------------------------------------- |
| `include/xrpl/telemetry/Telemetry.h` | ~160 | Main interface (global singleton) |
| `include/xrpl/telemetry/SpanGuard.h` | ~250 | RAII wrapper + factory methods + discard + no-op stub |
| `include/xrpl/telemetry/DiscardFlag.h` | ~28 | Thread-local discard flag |
| `include/xrpl/telemetry/TraceContext.h` | ~80 | Context propagation |
| `src/libxrpl/telemetry/Telemetry.cpp` | ~400 | Implementation + FilteringSpanProcessor |
| `src/libxrpl/telemetry/TelemetryConfig.cpp` | ~60 | Config parsing |
| `src/libxrpl/telemetry/NullTelemetry.cpp` | ~40 | No-op implementation |
#### Modified Files (Existing Xrpld Code)
| File | Lines Added | Lines Changed | Risk Level |
| ------------------------------------------------- | ----------- | ------------- | ---------- |
| `src/xrpld/app/main/Application.cpp` | ~15 | ~3 | Low |
| `include/xrpl/core/ServiceRegistry.h` | ~5 | ~2 | Low |
| `src/xrpld/rpc/detail/ServerHandler.cpp` | ~40 | ~10 | Low |
| `src/xrpld/rpc/handlers/*.cpp` | ~30 | ~8 | Low |
| `src/xrpld/overlay/detail/PeerImp.cpp` | ~60 | ~15 | Medium |
| `src/xrpld/overlay/detail/OverlayImpl.cpp` | ~30 | ~10 | Medium |
| `src/xrpld/app/consensus/RCLConsensus.cpp` | ~50 | ~15 | Medium |
| `src/xrpld/app/consensus/RCLConsensusAdaptor.cpp` | ~40 | ~12 | Medium |
| `src/xrpld/core/JobQueue.cpp` | ~20 | ~5 | Low |
| `src/xrpld/app/paths/PathRequest.cpp` | ~40 | ~3 | Low |
| `src/xrpld/app/paths/Pathfinder.cpp` | ~40 | ~2 | Low |
| `src/xrpld/app/misc/TxQ.cpp` | ~40 | ~3 | Low |
| `src/xrpld/app/main/LoadManager.cpp` | ~20 | ~2 | Low |
| `src/xrpld/app/misc/ValidatorList.cpp` | ~20 | ~2 | Low |
| `src/xrpld/app/misc/AmendmentTable.cpp` | ~10 | ~2 | Low |
| `src/xrpld/app/misc/Manifest.cpp` | ~10 | ~1 | Low |
| `src/xrpld/shamap/SHAMap.cpp` | ~20 | ~3 | Low |
| `src/xrpld/overlay/detail/ripple.proto` | ~25 | 0 | Low |
| `CMakeLists.txt` | ~40 | ~8 | Low |
| `cmake/FindOpenTelemetry.cmake` | ~50 | 0 | None (new) |
### 3.9.3 Risk Assessment by Component
<div align="center">
**Do First** ↖ ↗ **Plan Carefully**
```mermaid
quadrantChart
title Code Intrusiveness Risk Matrix
x-axis Low Risk --> High Risk
y-axis Low Value --> High Value
RPC Tracing: [0.2, 0.55]
Transaction Relay: [0.55, 0.85]
Consensus Tracing: [0.75, 0.92]
Peer Message Tracing: [0.85, 0.35]
JobQueue Context: [0.3, 0.42]
Ledger Acquisition: [0.48, 0.65]
PathFinding: [0.38, 0.72]
TxQ and Fees: [0.25, 0.62]
Validator Mgmt: [0.15, 0.35]
```
**Optional** ↙ ↘ **Avoid**
</div>
#### Risk Level Definitions
| Risk Level | Definition | Mitigation |
| ---------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------- |
| **Low** | Additive changes only; no modification to existing logic | Standard code review |
| **Medium** | Minor modifications to existing functions; clear boundaries | Comprehensive unit tests |
| **High** | Changes to core logic or data structures; potential side effects | Integration tests + staged rollout |
### 3.9.4 Architectural Impact Assessment
| Aspect | Impact | Justification |
| -------------------- | ------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| **Data Flow** | Minimal | Read-only instrumentation; no modification to consensus or transaction data flow |
| **Threading Model** | Minimal | Context propagation uses thread-local storage (standard OTel pattern) |
| **Memory Model** | Low | Bounded queues prevent unbounded growth; RAII ensures cleanup |
| **Network Protocol** | Low | Optional fields in protobuf (high field numbers); backward compatible |
| **Configuration** | None | New config section; existing configs unaffected |
| **Build System** | Low | Optional CMake flag; builds work without OpenTelemetry |
| **Dependencies** | Low | OpenTelemetry SDK is optional; null implementation when disabled |
### 3.9.5 Backward Compatibility
| Compatibility | Status | Notes |
| --------------- | ------- | ----------------------------------------------------- |
| **Config File** | ✅ Full | New `[telemetry]` section is optional |
| **Protocol** | ✅ Full | Optional protobuf fields with high field numbers |
| **Build** | ✅ Full | `XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY=OFF` produces identical binary |
| **Runtime** | ✅ Full | `enabled=0` produces zero overhead |
| **API** | ✅ Full | No changes to public RPC or P2P APIs |
### 3.9.6 Rollback Strategy
If issues are discovered after deployment:
1. **Immediate**: Set `enabled=0` in config and restart (zero code change)
2. **Quick**: Rebuild with `XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY=OFF`
3. **Complete**: Revert telemetry commits (clean separation makes this easy)
### 3.9.7 Code Change Examples
**Minimal RPC Instrumentation (Low Intrusiveness):** Instrumenting an RPC handler adds roughly 3-4 lines: one macro to start the span and one or two `setAttribute` calls (command name, status). The span ends automatically via RAII, so the existing control flow — process the request, send the result — is untouched.
**Consensus Instrumentation (Medium Intrusiveness):** Consensus is slightly more intrusive because child spans in later phase transitions need the round's context. Beyond the span-start and attribute macros, this requires storing the active context in a new member variable (`currentRoundContext_`) at round start. The existing round logic itself remains unchanged.
---
_Previous: [Design Decisions](./02-design-decisions.md)_ | _Next: [Configuration Reference](./05-configuration-reference.md)_ | _Back to: [Overview](./OpenTelemetryPlan.md)_

View File

@@ -1,264 +0,0 @@
# Configuration Reference
> **Parent Document**: [OpenTelemetryPlan.md](./OpenTelemetryPlan.md)
> **Related**: [Implementation Phases](./06-implementation-phases.md)
---
## 5.1 xrpld Configuration
> **OTLP** = OpenTelemetry Protocol | **TxQ** = Transaction Queue
### 5.1.1 Configuration File Section
The authoritative `[telemetry]` example lives in `cfg/xrpld-example.cfg`. Telemetry is disabled by default (`enabled=0`); enabling it turns on distributed tracing for transaction flow, consensus, and RPC calls, with traces exported to an OpenTelemetry Collector over OTLP. Head sampling is intentionally fixed at 1.0 (sample everything) and is not configurable — per-node head-sampling would produce broken/partial distributed traces, so volume reduction is delegated to the collector's tail sampling (see Section 7.4.2). The full option reference follows.
### 5.1.2 Configuration Options Summary
| Option | Type | Default | Description |
| --------------------- | ------ | --------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------- |
| `enabled` | bool | `false` | Enable/disable telemetry |
| `endpoint` | string | `http://localhost:4318/v1/traces` | OTLP/HTTP collector endpoint |
| `use_tls` | bool | `false` | Enable TLS for exporter connection |
| `tls_ca_cert` | string | `""` | Path to CA certificate file |
| `batch_size` | uint | `512` | Spans per export batch |
| `batch_delay_ms` | uint | `5000` | Max delay before sending batch (ms) |
| `max_queue_size` | uint | `2048` | Maximum queued spans |
| `trace_transactions` | bool | `true` | Enable transaction tracing |
| `trace_consensus` | bool | `true` | Enable consensus tracing |
| `trace_rpc` | bool | `true` | Enable RPC tracing |
| `trace_peer` | bool | `true` | Enable peer message tracing (high volume) |
| `trace_ledger` | bool | `true` | Enable ledger tracing |
| `service_name` | string | `"xrpld"` | Service name for traces |
| `service_instance_id` | string | `<node_pubkey>` | Instance identifier |
**Planned (not yet implemented)**: the following options appear in the design
documents but are not parsed by `TelemetryConfig.cpp` in Phase 1b and later
phases. They will be added as the corresponding subsystems are instrumented:
| Option | Planned Phase | Purpose |
| ----------------- | ------------- | ---------------------------------------- |
| `exporter` | Future | Select between OTLP/HTTP and OTLP/gRPC |
| `trace_pathfind` | Phase 2 | Path computation tracing toggle |
| `trace_txq` | Phase 3 | Transaction queue tracing toggle |
| `trace_validator` | Future | Validator list / manifest update tracing |
| `trace_amendment` | Future | Amendment voting tracing |
---
## 5.2 Configuration Parser
> **TxQ** = Transaction Queue
The parser `setup_Telemetry()` in `src/libxrpl/telemetry/TelemetryConfig.cpp` reads the `[telemetry]` `Section` and populates a `Telemetry::Setup` struct, applying the defaults listed in Section 5.1.2 via `section.value_or(...)`. It derives `serviceInstanceId` from the node public key when not overridden, selects the exporter endpoint default by exporter type, and leaves the sampling ratio at its fixed 1.0 default (not read from config — see Section 7.4.2).
---
## 5.3 Application Integration
### 5.3.1 ApplicationImp Changes
> **Deferred identity**: The node public key (`nodeIdentity_`) is not
> available during `ApplicationImp`'s member initializer list — it is
> resolved later in `setup()`. The `Telemetry` object is therefore
> constructed with an empty `serviceInstanceId` and patched via
> `setServiceInstanceId()` once `setup()` has called `getNodeIdentity()`.
`ApplicationImp` (in `src/xrpld/app/main/Application.cpp`) owns a `std::unique_ptr<telemetry::Telemetry> telemetry_`. It is built in the member initializer list via `make_Telemetry(setup_Telemetry(...))` with an empty `serviceInstanceId`, then patched in `setup()` by calling `setServiceInstanceId()` with the Base58 node public key (unless the user supplied a custom `service_instance_id`). `start()` and `run()` forward to `telemetry_->start()` / `telemetry_->stop()`, and `getTelemetry()` returns the owned instance.
### 5.3.2 ServiceRegistry Interface Addition
`include/xrpl/core/ServiceRegistry.h` gains a pure-virtual `telemetry::Telemetry& getTelemetry()` (with a forward declaration of `telemetry::Telemetry`), giving every component a uniform accessor for the tracing subsystem.
> **Note:** `Application` extends `ServiceRegistry`, so `getTelemetry()` is
> available on both. Components that hold a `ServiceRegistry&` (e.g.
> `NetworkOPsImp`) call `registry_.get().getTelemetry()`. Components that
> still hold an `Application&` (e.g. `ServerHandler`, `PeerImp`,
> `RCLConsensusAdaptor`) call `app_.getTelemetry()` directly.
---
## 5.4 CMake Integration
> **OTLP** = OpenTelemetry Protocol
### 5.4.1 Find OpenTelemetry Module
A `cmake/FindOpenTelemetry.cmake` module locates the OpenTelemetry C++ SDK. It first tries `find_package(opentelemetry-cpp CONFIG)`, aliasing the imported targets `OpenTelemetry::api`, `OpenTelemetry::sdk`, and `OpenTelemetry::otlp_grpc_exporter`, and falls back to `pkg-config` when no CMake config package is present.
### 5.4.2 CMakeLists.txt Changes
The top-level `CMakeLists.txt` adds an `XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY` option (default `OFF`). When enabled, it runs `find_package(OpenTelemetry REQUIRED)`, defines the `XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY` compile flag, and builds the `xrpl_telemetry` library from the real telemetry sources linked against the OpenTelemetry targets; when disabled, it builds the same target from a no-op `NullTelemetry.cpp` so call sites compile unchanged.
---
## 5.5 OpenTelemetry Collector Configuration
> **OTLP** = OpenTelemetry Protocol | **APM** = Application Performance Monitoring
The authoritative collector config lives in the repo at `docker/telemetry/otel-collector-config.yaml` (with Tempo backend config in `docker/telemetry/tempo.yaml`). The sections below summarize the development and production shapes of that pipeline.
### 5.5.1 Development Configuration
The development collector enables an OTLP receiver on both gRPC (`0.0.0.0:4317`) and HTTP (`0.0.0.0:4318`), a single `batch` processor (1s timeout, batch size 100), and two exporters: a `logging` exporter for console debugging and `otlp/tempo` (insecure) for trace visualization. The single `traces` pipeline wires receiver → batch → both exporters.
### 5.5.2 Production Configuration
The production collector adds TLS on the OTLP gRPC receiver and a richer processor chain: a `memory_limiter` (OOM guard), `batch` (5s timeout, size 512), `tail_sampling`, and an `attributes` processor that hashes sensitive fields (e.g. `tx_account`) and stamps `deployment.environment`. Tail sampling keeps all `ERROR` traces, slow consensus rounds (>5s) and slow RPC requests (>1s), and probabilistically samples the remainder at 10%. Exporters target Grafana Tempo (TLS) and Elastic APM; `health_check` and `zpages` extensions are enabled for operability.
---
## 5.6 Docker Compose Development Environment
> **OTLP** = OpenTelemetry Protocol
The authoritative development stack lives in the repo at `docker/telemetry/docker-compose.yml`. It brings up four services on a shared `xrpld-telemetry` network: an `otel-collector` (otel/opentelemetry-collector-contrib) exposing OTLP gRPC `4317`, OTLP HTTP `4318`, and health check `13133`; `tempo` for trace storage/visualization; `grafana` with provisioned datasources and dashboards (anonymous admin enabled); and an optional `prometheus` for metric correlation.
---
## 5.7 Configuration Architecture
> **OTLP** = OpenTelemetry Protocol
```mermaid
flowchart TB
subgraph config["Configuration Sources"]
cfgFile["xrpld.cfg<br/>[telemetry] section"]
cmake["CMake<br/>XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY"]
end
subgraph init["Initialization"]
parse["setup_Telemetry()"]
factory["make_Telemetry()"]
end
subgraph runtime["Runtime Components"]
tracer["TracerProvider"]
exporter["OTLP Exporter"]
processor["BatchProcessor"]
end
subgraph collector["Collector Pipeline"]
recv["Receivers"]
proc["Processors"]
exp["Exporters"]
end
cfgFile --> parse
cmake -->|"compile flag"| parse
parse --> factory
factory --> tracer
tracer --> processor
processor --> exporter
exporter -->|"OTLP"| recv
recv --> proc
proc --> exp
style config fill:#e3f2fd,stroke:#1976d2
style runtime fill:#e8f5e9,stroke:#388e3c
style collector fill:#fff3e0,stroke:#ff9800
```
**Reading the diagram:**
- **Configuration Sources**: `xrpld.cfg` provides runtime settings (endpoint, sampling) while the CMake flag controls whether telemetry is compiled in at all.
- **Initialization**: `setup_Telemetry()` parses config values, then `make_Telemetry()` constructs the provider, processor, and exporter objects.
- **Runtime Components**: The `TracerProvider` creates spans, the `BatchProcessor` buffers them, and the `OTLP Exporter` serializes and sends them over the wire.
- **OTLP arrow to Collector**: Trace data leaves the xrpld process via OTLP (gRPC or HTTP) and enters the external Collector pipeline.
- **Collector Pipeline**: `Receivers` ingest OTLP data, `Processors` apply sampling/filtering/enrichment, and `Exporters` forward traces to storage backends (Tempo, etc.).
---
## 5.8 Grafana Integration
> **APM** = Application Performance Monitoring
Step-by-step instructions for integrating xrpld traces with Grafana.
### 5.8.1 Data Source Configuration
#### Tempo (Recommended)
A Tempo datasource (`grafana/provisioning/datasources/tempo.yaml`, provisioned from `docker/telemetry/grafana/`) points at `http://tempo:3200` and enables `tracesToLogs` (linking to Loki on `service.name`/`tx_hash` and mapping `trace_id``traceID`), `serviceMap` against Prometheus, the node graph, and Loki search.
#### Elastic APM
Alternatively, an Elasticsearch datasource (`grafana/provisioning/datasources/elastic-apm.yaml`) of type `elasticsearch` points at `http://elasticsearch:9200` against the `apm-*` index, using `@timestamp` as the time field and mapping the log message/level fields.
### 5.8.2 Dashboard Provisioning
A dashboard provider (`grafana/provisioning/dashboards/dashboards.yaml`) loads the `xrpld` dashboard folder from disk (`/var/lib/grafana/dashboards/rippled`), polling for changes every 30s with deletion disabled.
### 5.8.3 Example Dashboard: RPC Performance
An example `xrpld RPC Performance` dashboard (uid `xrpld-rpc-performance`) sourced from Tempo via TraceQL provides four panels: RPC latency by command (heatmap), RPC error rate by command (timeseries), the top 10 slowest RPC commands by average duration (table), and a recent-traces table.
### 5.8.4 Example Dashboard: Transaction Tracing
An example `xrpld Transaction Tracing` dashboard (uid `xrpld-tx-tracing`) over Tempo provides three panels: transaction throughput (`tx.receive` rate, stat), cross-node relay count (average `span.relay_count` on `tx.relay`, timeseries), and a table of transaction validation errors (`tx.validate` with `status.code=error`).
### 5.8.5 TraceQL Query Examples
Common queries for xrpld traces:
```
# Find all traces for a specific transaction hash
{resource.service.name="xrpld" && span.tx_hash="ABC123..."}
# Find slow RPC commands (>100ms)
{resource.service.name="xrpld" && name=~"rpc.command.*"} | duration > 100ms
# Find consensus rounds taking >5 seconds
{resource.service.name="xrpld" && name="consensus.round"} | duration > 5s
# Find failed transactions with error details
{resource.service.name="xrpld" && name="tx.validate" && status.code=error}
# Find transactions relayed to many peers
{resource.service.name="xrpld" && name="tx.relay"} | span.relay_count > 10
# Compare latency across nodes
{resource.service.name="xrpld" && name="rpc.command.account_info"} | avg(duration) by (resource.service.instance.id)
```
### 5.8.6 Correlation with PerfLog
To correlate OpenTelemetry traces with existing PerfLog data:
**Step 1: Configure Loki to ingest PerfLog**
Configure a Promtail scrape job (`promtail-config.yaml`) that tails `/var/log/rippled/perf*.log`, parses each JSON line, and promotes `trace_id`, `ledger_seq`, and `tx_hash` to Loki labels.
**Step 2: Add trace_id to PerfLog entries**
Modify PerfLog so its JSON output includes a `trace_id` field whenever a valid span is active: fetch the current span from the OpenTelemetry runtime context, and if its context is valid, render the trace ID as a 32-character lowercase hex string into the log entry.
**Step 3: Configure Grafana trace-to-logs link**
In the Tempo datasource, set the `tracesToLogs` derived field to link to Loki on the `trace_id` and `tx_hash` tags, with `filterByTraceID: true`.
### 5.8.7 Correlation with Insight/StatsD Metrics
To correlate traces with existing Beast Insight metrics:
**Step 1: Export Insight metrics to Prometheus**
Add a Prometheus scrape job (`prometheus.yaml`) named `xrpld-statsd` targeting the StatsD exporter at `statsd-exporter:9102`.
**Step 2: Add exemplars to metrics**
The OpenTelemetry SDK automatically adds exemplars (trace IDs) to metrics when using the Prometheus exporter, linking metric spikes to specific traces.
**Step 3: Configure Grafana metric-to-trace link**
In the Prometheus datasource, set `exemplarTraceIdDestinations` to map the `trace_id` exemplar to the Tempo datasource.
**Step 4: Dashboard panel with exemplars**
Add a timeseries panel over Prometheus (e.g. `histogram_quantile(0.99, rate(xrpld_rpc_duration_seconds_bucket[5m]))`) with `exemplar: true` enabled.
This allows clicking on metric data points to jump directly to the related trace.
---
_Previous: [Implementation Strategy](./03-implementation-strategy.md)_ | _Next: [Implementation Phases](./06-implementation-phases.md)_ | _Back to: [Overview](./OpenTelemetryPlan.md)_

View File

@@ -1,575 +0,0 @@
# Implementation Phases
> **Parent Document**: [OpenTelemetryPlan.md](./OpenTelemetryPlan.md)
> **Related**: [Configuration Reference](./05-configuration-reference.md) | [Observability Backends](./07-observability-backends.md)
---
## 6.1 Phase Overview
> **TxQ** = Transaction Queue
```mermaid
gantt
title OpenTelemetry Implementation Timeline
dateFormat YYYY-MM-DD
axisFormat Week %W
section Phase 1
Core Infrastructure :p1, 2024-01-01, 2w
SDK Integration :p1a, 2024-01-01, 4d
Telemetry Interface :p1b, after p1a, 3d
Configuration & CMake :p1c, after p1b, 3d
Unit Tests :p1d, after p1c, 2d
Buffer & Integration :p1e, after p1d, 2d
section Phase 2
RPC Tracing :p2, after p1, 2w
HTTP Context Extraction :p2a, after p1, 2d
RPC Handler Instrumentation :p2b, after p2a, 4d
PathFinding Instrumentation :p2f, after p2b, 2d
TxQ Instrumentation :p2g, after p2f, 2d
WebSocket Support :p2c, after p2g, 2d
Integration Tests :p2d, after p2c, 2d
Buffer & Review :p2e, after p2d, 4d
section Phase 3
Transaction Tracing :p3, after p2, 2w
Protocol Buffer Extension :p3a, after p2, 2d
PeerImp Instrumentation :p3b, after p3a, 3d
Fee Escalation Instrumentation :p3f, after p3b, 2d
Relay Context Propagation :p3c, after p3f, 3d
Multi-node Tests :p3d, after p3c, 2d
Buffer & Review :p3e, after p3d, 4d
section Phase 4
Consensus Tracing :p4, after p3, 2w
Consensus Round Spans :p4a, after p3, 3d
Proposal Handling :p4b, after p4a, 3d
Validator List & Manifest Tracing :p4f, after p4b, 2d
Amendment Voting Tracing :p4g, after p4f, 2d
SHAMap Sync Tracing :p4h, after p4g, 2d
Validation Tests :p4c, after p4h, 4d
Buffer & Review :p4e, after p4c, 4d
section Phase 5
Documentation & Deploy :p5, after p4, 1w
```
---
## 6.2 Phase 1: Core Infrastructure (Weeks 1-2)
**Objective**: Establish foundational telemetry infrastructure
### Tasks
| Task | Description |
| ---- | ----------------------------------------------------- |
| 1.1 | Add OpenTelemetry C++ SDK to Conan/CMake |
| 1.2 | Implement `Telemetry` interface and factory |
| 1.3 | Implement `SpanGuard` RAII wrapper |
| 1.4 | Implement configuration parser |
| 1.5 | Integrate into `ApplicationImp` |
| 1.6 | Add conditional compilation (`XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY`) |
| 1.7 | Create `NullTelemetry` no-op implementation |
| 1.8 | Unit tests for core infrastructure |
### Exit Criteria
- [ ] OpenTelemetry SDK compiles and links
- [ ] Telemetry can be enabled/disabled via config
- [ ] Basic span creation works
- [ ] No performance regression when disabled
- [ ] Unit tests passing
---
## 6.3 Phase 2: RPC Tracing (Weeks 3-4)
> **TxQ** = Transaction Queue
**Objective**: Complete tracing for all RPC operations
### Tasks
| Task | Description |
| ---- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 2.1 | Implement W3C Trace Context HTTP header extraction |
| 2.2 | Instrument `ServerHandler::onRequest()` |
| 2.3 | Instrument `RPCHandler::doCommand()` |
| 2.4 | Add RPC-specific attributes |
| 2.5 | Instrument WebSocket handler |
| 2.6 | PathFinding instrumentation (`pathfind.request`, `pathfind.compute` spans) |
| 2.7 | TxQ instrumentation (`txq.enqueue`, `txq.apply` spans) |
| 2.8 | Integration tests for RPC tracing |
| 2.9 | Performance benchmarks |
| 2.10 | Documentation |
### Exit Criteria
- [ ] All RPC commands traced
- [ ] Trace context propagates from HTTP headers
- [ ] WebSocket and HTTP both instrumented
- [ ] <1ms overhead per RPC call
- [ ] Integration tests passing
---
## 6.4 Phase 3: Transaction Tracing (Weeks 5-6)
**Objective**: Trace transaction lifecycle across network
### Tasks
| Task | Description |
| ---- | ---------------------------------------------------- |
| 3.1 | Define `TraceContext` Protocol Buffer message |
| 3.2 | Implement protobuf context serialization |
| 3.3 | Instrument `PeerImp::handleTransaction()` |
| 3.4 | Instrument `NetworkOPs::submitTransaction()` |
| 3.5 | Instrument HashRouter integration |
| 3.6 | Fee escalation instrumentation (`fee.escalate` span) |
| 3.7 | Implement relay context propagation |
| 3.8 | Integration tests (multi-node) |
| 3.9 | Performance benchmarks |
### Exit Criteria
- [ ] Transaction traces span across nodes
- [ ] Trace context in Protocol Buffer messages
- [ ] HashRouter deduplication visible in traces
- [ ] Multi-node integration tests passing
- [ ] <5% overhead on transaction throughput
---
## 6.5 Phase 4: Consensus Tracing (Weeks 7-8)
**Objective**: Full observability into consensus rounds
### Tasks
| Task | Description |
| ---- | ---------------------------------------------- |
| 4.1 | Instrument `RCLConsensusAdaptor::startRound()` |
| 4.2 | Instrument phase transitions |
| 4.3 | Instrument proposal handling |
| 4.4 | Instrument validation handling |
| 4.5 | Add consensus-specific attributes |
| 4.6 | Correlate with transaction traces |
| 4.7 | Validator list and manifest tracing |
| 4.8 | Amendment voting tracing |
| 4.9 | SHAMap sync tracing |
| 4.10 | Multi-validator integration tests |
| 4.11 | Performance validation |
### Exit Criteria
- [ ] Complete consensus round traces
- [ ] Phase transitions visible
- [ ] Proposals and validations traced
- [ ] No impact on consensus timing
- [ ] Multi-validator test network validated
### Implementation Status — Phase 4a Plan
Phase 4a (establish-phase gap fill & cross-node correlation) will add:
- **Deterministic trace ID** derived from `previousLedger.id()` so all validators
in the same round share the same `trace_id` (switchable via
`consensus_trace_strategy` config: `"deterministic"` or `"attribute"`).
See [Configuration Reference](./05-configuration-reference.md) for full
configuration options.
- **Round lifecycle spans**: `consensus.round` with round-to-round span links.
- **Establish phase**: `consensus.establish`, `consensus.update_positions` (with
`dispute.resolve` events), `consensus.check` (with threshold tracking).
- **Mode changes**: `consensus.mode_change` spans.
- **Validation**: `consensus.validation.send` with span link to round span
(thread-safe cross-thread access via `roundSpanContext_` snapshot).
- **Separation of concerns**: telemetry extracted to private helpers
(`startRoundTracing`, `createValidationSpan`, `startEstablishTracing`,
`updateEstablishTracing`, `endEstablishTracing`).
The `Phase4_taskList.md` spec document is introduced in the Phase 2 PR (#6424)
and will contain the full task breakdown and implementation notes.
---
## 6.6 Phase 5: Documentation & Deployment (Week 9)
**Objective**: Production readiness
### Tasks
| Task | Description |
| ---- | ----------------------------- |
| 5.1 | Operator runbook |
| 5.2 | Grafana dashboards |
| 5.3 | Alert definitions |
| 5.4 | Collector deployment examples |
| 5.5 | Developer documentation |
| 5.6 | Training materials |
| 5.7 | Final integration testing |
---
## 6.7 Risk Assessment
```mermaid
quadrantChart
title Risk Assessment Matrix
x-axis Low Impact --> High Impact
y-axis Low Likelihood --> High Likelihood
quadrant-1 Mitigate Immediately
quadrant-2 Plan Mitigation
quadrant-3 Accept Risk
quadrant-4 Monitor Closely
SDK Compat: [0.2, 0.18]
Protocol Chg: [0.75, 0.72]
Perf Overhead: [0.58, 0.42]
Context Prop: [0.4, 0.55]
Memory Leaks: [0.85, 0.25]
```
### Risk Details
| Risk | Likelihood | Impact | Mitigation |
| ------------------------------------ | ---------- | ------ | --------------------------------------- |
| Protocol changes break compatibility | Medium | High | Use high field numbers, optional fields |
| Performance overhead unacceptable | Medium | Medium | Sampling, conditional compilation |
| Context propagation complexity | Medium | Medium | Phased rollout, extensive testing |
| SDK compatibility issues | Low | Medium | Pin SDK version, fallback to no-op |
| Memory leaks in long-running nodes | Low | High | Memory profiling, bounded queues |
---
## 6.8 Success Metrics
| Metric | Target | Measurement |
| ------------------------ | -------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------- |
| Trace coverage | >95% of transaction code paths (independent of sampling ratio) | Sampling verification |
| CPU overhead | <3% | Benchmark tests |
| Memory overhead | <10 MB | Memory profiling |
| Latency impact (p99) | <2% | Performance tests |
| Trace completeness | >99% spans with required attrs | Validation script |
| Cross-node trace linkage | >90% of multi-hop transactions | Integration tests |
---
## 6.9 Quick Wins and Crawl-Walk-Run Strategy
> **TxQ** = Transaction Queue
This section outlines a prioritized approach to maximize ROI with minimal initial investment.
### 6.9.1 Crawl-Walk-Run Overview
<div align="center">
```mermaid
flowchart TB
subgraph crawl["🐢 CRAWL (Week 1-2)"]
direction LR
c1[Core SDK Setup] ~~~ c2[RPC Tracing Only] ~~~ c3[PathFinding + TxQ Tracing] ~~~ c4[Single Node]
end
subgraph walk["🚶 WALK (Week 3-5)"]
direction LR
w1[Transaction Tracing] ~~~ w2[Fee Escalation Tracing] ~~~ w3[Cross-Node Context] ~~~ w4[Basic Dashboards]
end
subgraph run["🏃 RUN (Week 6-9)"]
direction LR
r1[Consensus Tracing] ~~~ r2[Validator, Amendment,<br/>SHAMap Tracing] ~~~ r3[Full Correlation] ~~~ r4[Production Deploy]
end
crawl --> walk --> run
style crawl fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#fff
style walk fill:#bf360c,stroke:#8c2809,color:#fff
style run fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#fff
style c1 fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#fff
style c2 fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#fff
style c3 fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#fff
style c4 fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#fff
style w1 fill:#ffe0b2,stroke:#ffcc80,color:#1e293b
style w2 fill:#ffe0b2,stroke:#ffcc80,color:#1e293b
style w3 fill:#ffe0b2,stroke:#ffcc80,color:#1e293b
style w4 fill:#ffe0b2,stroke:#ffcc80,color:#1e293b
style r1 fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#fff
style r2 fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#fff
style r3 fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#fff
style r4 fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#fff
```
</div>
**Reading the diagram:**
- **CRAWL (Weeks 1-2)**: Minimal investment -- set up the SDK, instrument RPC and PathFinding/TxQ handlers, and verify on a single node. Delivers immediate latency visibility.
- **WALK (Weeks 3-5)**: Expand to transaction lifecycle tracing, fee escalation, cross-node context propagation, and basic Grafana dashboards. This is where distributed tracing starts working.
- **RUN (Weeks 6-9)**: Full consensus instrumentation, validator/amendment/SHAMap tracing, end-to-end correlation, and production deployment with sampling and alerting.
- **Arrows (crawl → walk → run)**: Each phase builds on the prior one; you cannot skip ahead because later phases depend on infrastructure established earlier.
### 6.9.2 Quick Wins (Immediate Value)
| Quick Win | Value | When to Deploy |
| ------------------------------ | ------ | -------------- |
| **RPC Command Tracing** | High | Week 2 |
| **RPC Latency Histograms** | High | Week 2 |
| **Error Rate Dashboard** | Medium | Week 2 |
| **Transaction Submit Tracing** | High | Week 3 |
| **Consensus Round Duration** | Medium | Week 6 |
### 6.9.3 CRAWL Phase (Weeks 1-2)
**Goal**: Get basic tracing working with minimal code changes.
**What You Get**:
- RPC request/response traces for all commands
- Latency breakdown per RPC command
- PathFinding and TxQ tracing (directly impacts RPC latency)
- Error visibility with stack traces
- Basic Grafana dashboard
**Code Changes**: ~15 lines in `ServerHandler.cpp`, ~40 lines in new telemetry module
**Why Start Here**:
- RPC is the lowest-risk, highest-visibility component
- PathFinding and TxQ are RPC-adjacent and directly affect latency
- Immediate value for debugging client issues
- No cross-node complexity
- Single file modification to existing code
### 6.9.4 WALK Phase (Weeks 3-5)
**Goal**: Add transaction lifecycle tracing across nodes.
**What You Get**:
- End-to-end transaction traces from submit to relay
- Fee escalation tracing within the transaction pipeline
- Cross-node correlation (see transaction path)
- HashRouter deduplication visibility
- Relay latency metrics
**Code Changes**: ~120 lines across 4 files, plus protobuf extension
**Why Do This Second**:
- Builds on RPC tracing (transactions submitted via RPC)
- Fee escalation is integral to the transaction processing pipeline
- Moderate complexity (requires context propagation)
- High value for debugging transaction issues
### 6.9.5 RUN Phase (Weeks 6-9)
**Goal**: Full observability including consensus.
**What You Get**:
- Complete consensus round visibility
- Phase transition timing
- Validator proposal tracking
- Validator list and manifest tracing
- Amendment voting tracing
- SHAMap sync tracing
- Full end-to-end traces (client → RPC → TX → consensus → ledger)
**Code Changes**: ~100 lines across 3 consensus files, plus validator/amendment/SHAMap modules
**Why Do This Last**:
- Highest complexity (consensus is critical path)
- Validator, amendment, and SHAMap components are lower priority
- Requires thorough testing
- Lower relative value (consensus issues are rarer)
### 6.9.6 ROI Prioritization Matrix
```mermaid
quadrantChart
title Implementation ROI Matrix
x-axis Low Effort --> High Effort
y-axis Low Value --> High Value
quadrant-1 Quick Wins - Do First
quadrant-2 Major Projects - Plan Carefully
quadrant-3 Nice to Have - Optional
quadrant-4 Time Sinks - Avoid
RPC Tracing: [0.15, 0.92]
TX Submit Trace: [0.3, 0.78]
TX Relay Trace: [0.5, 0.88]
Consensus Trace: [0.72, 0.72]
Peer Msg Trace: [0.85, 0.3]
Ledger Acquire: [0.55, 0.52]
```
---
## 6.10 Definition of Done
> **TxQ** = Transaction Queue | **HA** = High Availability
Clear, measurable criteria for each phase.
### 6.10.1 Phase 1: Core Infrastructure
| Criterion | Measurement | Target |
| --------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------- |
| SDK Integration | `cmake --build` succeeds with `-DXRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY=ON` | ✅ Compiles |
| Runtime Toggle | `enabled=0` produces zero overhead | <0.1% CPU difference |
| Span Creation | Unit test creates and exports span | Span appears in Tempo |
| Configuration | All config options parsed correctly | Config validation tests pass |
| Documentation | Developer guide exists | PR approved |
**Definition of Done**: All criteria met, PR merged, no regressions in CI.
### 6.10.2 Phase 2: RPC Tracing
| Criterion | Measurement | Target |
| ------------------ | ---------------------------------- | -------------------------- |
| Coverage | All RPC commands instrumented | 100% of commands |
| Context Extraction | traceparent header propagates | Integration test passes |
| Attributes | Command, status, duration recorded | Validation script confirms |
| Performance | RPC latency overhead | <1ms p99 |
| Dashboard | Grafana dashboard deployed | Screenshot in docs |
**Definition of Done**: RPC traces visible in Tempo for all commands, dashboard shows latency distribution.
### 6.10.3 Phase 3: Transaction Tracing
| Criterion | Measurement | Target |
| ---------------- | ------------------------------- | ---------------------------------- |
| Local Trace | Submit validate TxQ traced | Single-node test passes |
| Cross-Node | Context propagates via protobuf | Multi-node test passes |
| Relay Visibility | relay_count attribute correct | Spot check 100 txs |
| HashRouter | Deduplication visible in trace | Duplicate txs show suppressed=true |
| Performance | TX throughput overhead | <5% degradation |
**Definition of Done**: Transaction traces span 3+ nodes in test network, performance within bounds.
### 6.10.4 Phase 4: Consensus Tracing
| Criterion | Measurement | Target |
| -------------------- | ----------------------------- | ------------------------- |
| Round Tracing | startRound creates root span | Unit test passes |
| Phase Visibility | All phases have child spans | Integration test confirms |
| Proposer Attribution | Proposer ID in attributes | Spot check 50 rounds |
| Timing Accuracy | Phase durations match PerfLog | <5% variance |
| No Consensus Impact | Round timing unchanged | Performance test passes |
**Definition of Done**: Consensus rounds fully traceable, no impact on consensus timing.
### 6.10.5 Phase 5: Production Deployment
| Criterion | Measurement | Target |
| ------------ | ---------------------------- | -------------------------- |
| Collector HA | Multiple collectors deployed | No single point of failure |
| Sampling | Tail sampling configured | 10% base + errors + slow |
| Retention | Data retained per policy | 7 days hot, 30 days warm |
| Alerting | Alerts configured | Error spike, high latency |
| Runbook | Operator documentation | Approved by ops team |
| Training | Team trained | Session completed |
**Definition of Done**: Telemetry running in production, operators trained, alerts active.
### 6.10.6 Success Metrics Summary
| Phase | Primary Metric | Secondary Metric | Deadline |
| ------- | ---------------------- | --------------------------- | ------------- |
| Phase 1 | SDK compiles and runs | Zero overhead when disabled | End of Week 2 |
| Phase 2 | 100% RPC coverage | <1ms latency overhead | End of Week 4 |
| Phase 3 | Cross-node traces work | <5% throughput impact | End of Week 6 |
| Phase 4 | Consensus fully traced | No consensus timing impact | End of Week 8 |
| Phase 5 | Production deployment | Operators trained | End of Week 9 |
---
## 6.11 Recommended Implementation Order
Based on ROI analysis, implement in this exact order:
```mermaid
flowchart TB
subgraph week1["Week 1"]
t1[1. OpenTelemetry SDK<br/>Conan/CMake integration]
t2[2. Telemetry interface<br/>SpanGuard, config]
end
subgraph week2["Week 2"]
t3[3. RPC ServerHandler<br/>instrumentation]
t4[4. Basic Tempo setup<br/>for testing]
end
subgraph week3["Week 3"]
t5[5. Transaction submit<br/>tracing]
t6[6. Grafana dashboard<br/>v1]
end
subgraph week4["Week 4"]
t7[7. Protobuf context<br/>extension]
t8[8. PeerImp tx.relay<br/>instrumentation]
end
subgraph week5["Week 5"]
t9[9. Multi-node<br/>integration tests]
t10[10. Performance<br/>benchmarks]
end
subgraph week6_8["Weeks 6-8"]
t11[11. Consensus<br/>instrumentation]
t12[12. Full integration<br/>testing]
end
subgraph week9["Week 9"]
t13[13. Production<br/>deployment]
t14[14. Documentation<br/>& training]
end
t1 --> t2 --> t3 --> t4
t4 --> t5 --> t6
t6 --> t7 --> t8
t8 --> t9 --> t10
t10 --> t11 --> t12
t12 --> t13 --> t14
style week1 fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#fff
style week2 fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#fff
style week3 fill:#bf360c,stroke:#8c2809,color:#fff
style week4 fill:#bf360c,stroke:#8c2809,color:#fff
style week5 fill:#bf360c,stroke:#8c2809,color:#fff
style week6_8 fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#fff
style week9 fill:#4a148c,stroke:#2e0d57,color:#fff
style t1 fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#fff
style t2 fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#fff
style t3 fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#fff
style t4 fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#fff
style t5 fill:#ffe0b2,stroke:#ffcc80,color:#1e293b
style t6 fill:#ffe0b2,stroke:#ffcc80,color:#1e293b
style t7 fill:#ffe0b2,stroke:#ffcc80,color:#1e293b
style t8 fill:#ffe0b2,stroke:#ffcc80,color:#1e293b
style t9 fill:#ffe0b2,stroke:#ffcc80,color:#1e293b
style t10 fill:#ffe0b2,stroke:#ffcc80,color:#1e293b
style t11 fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#fff
style t12 fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#fff
style t13 fill:#4a148c,stroke:#2e0d57,color:#fff
style t14 fill:#4a148c,stroke:#2e0d57,color:#fff
```
**Reading the diagram:**
- **Week 1 (tasks 1-2)**: Foundation work -- integrate the OpenTelemetry SDK via Conan/CMake and build the `Telemetry` interface with `SpanGuard` and config parsing.
- **Week 2 (tasks 3-4)**: First observable output -- instrument `ServerHandler` for RPC tracing and stand up Tempo so developers can see traces immediately.
- **Weeks 3-5 (tasks 5-10)**: Transaction lifecycle -- add submit tracing, build the first Grafana dashboard, extend protobuf for cross-node context, instrument `PeerImp` relay, then validate with multi-node integration tests and performance benchmarks.
- **Weeks 6-8 (tasks 11-12)**: Consensus deep-dive -- instrument consensus rounds and phases, then run full integration testing across all instrumented paths.
- **Week 9 (tasks 13-14)**: Go-live -- deploy to production with sampling/alerting configured, and deliver documentation and operator training.
- **Arrow chain (t1 ... t14)**: Strict sequential dependency; each task's output is a prerequisite for the next.
---
_Previous: [Configuration Reference](./05-configuration-reference.md)_ | _Next: [Observability Backends](./07-observability-backends.md)_ | _Back to: [Overview](./OpenTelemetryPlan.md)_

View File

@@ -1,404 +0,0 @@
# Observability Backend Recommendations
> **Parent Document**: [OpenTelemetryPlan.md](./OpenTelemetryPlan.md)
> **Related**: [Implementation Phases](./06-implementation-phases.md) | [Appendix](./08-appendix.md)
---
## 7.1 Development/Testing Backends
> **OTLP** = OpenTelemetry Protocol
| Backend | Pros | Cons | Use Case |
| ---------- | ----------------------------------- | ---------------------- | ------------------- |
| **Tempo** | Cost-effective, Grafana integration | Requires Grafana stack | Local dev, CI, Prod |
| **Zipkin** | Simple, lightweight | Basic features | Quick prototyping |
### Quick Start with Tempo
```bash
# Start Tempo with OTLP support
docker run -d --name tempo \
-p 3200:3200 \
-p 4317:4317 \
-p 4318:4318 \
grafana/tempo:2.6.1
```
---
## 7.2 Production Backends
> **APM** = Application Performance Monitoring
| Backend | Pros | Cons | Use Case |
| ----------------- | ----------------------------------------- | ---------------------- | --------------------------- |
| **Grafana Tempo** | Cost-effective, Grafana integration | Requires Grafana stack | Most production deployments |
| **Elastic APM** | Full observability stack, log correlation | Resource intensive | Existing Elastic users |
| **Honeycomb** | Excellent query, high cardinality | SaaS cost | Deep debugging needs |
| **Datadog APM** | Full platform, easy setup | SaaS cost | Enterprise with budget |
### Backend Selection Flowchart
```mermaid
flowchart TD
start[Select Backend] --> budget{Budget<br/>Constraints?}
budget -->|Yes| oss[Open Source]
budget -->|No| saas{Prefer<br/>SaaS?}
oss --> existing{Existing<br/>Stack?}
existing -->|Grafana| tempo[Grafana Tempo]
existing -->|Elastic| elastic[Elastic APM]
existing -->|None| tempo
saas -->|Yes| enterprise{Enterprise<br/>Support?}
saas -->|No| oss
enterprise -->|Yes| datadog[Datadog APM]
enterprise -->|No| honeycomb[Honeycomb]
tempo --> final[Configure Collector]
elastic --> final
honeycomb --> final
datadog --> final
style start fill:#0f172a,stroke:#020617,color:#fff
style budget fill:#334155,stroke:#1e293b,color:#fff
style oss fill:#1e293b,stroke:#0f172a,color:#fff
style existing fill:#334155,stroke:#1e293b,color:#fff
style saas fill:#334155,stroke:#1e293b,color:#fff
style enterprise fill:#334155,stroke:#1e293b,color:#fff
style final fill:#0f172a,stroke:#020617,color:#fff
style tempo fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#fff
style elastic fill:#bf360c,stroke:#8c2809,color:#fff
style honeycomb fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#fff
style datadog fill:#4a148c,stroke:#2e0d57,color:#fff
```
**Reading the diagram:**
- **Budget Constraints? (Yes)**: Leads to open-source options. If you already run Grafana or Elastic, pick the matching backend; otherwise default to Grafana Tempo.
- **Budget Constraints? (No) → Prefer SaaS?**: If you want a managed service, choose between Datadog (enterprise support) and Honeycomb (developer-focused). If not, fall back to open-source.
- **Terminal nodes (Tempo / Elastic / Honeycomb / Datadog)**: Each represents a concrete backend choice, all of which feed into the same final step.
- **Configure Collector**: Regardless of backend, you always finish by configuring the OTel Collector to export to your chosen destination.
---
## 7.3 Recommended Production Architecture
> **OTLP** = OpenTelemetry Protocol | **APM** = Application Performance Monitoring | **HA** = High Availability
```mermaid
flowchart TB
subgraph validators["Validator Nodes"]
v1[xrpld<br/>Validator 1]
v2[xrpld<br/>Validator 2]
end
subgraph stock["Stock Nodes"]
s1[xrpld<br/>Stock 1]
s2[xrpld<br/>Stock 2]
end
subgraph collector["OTel Collector Cluster"]
c1[Collector<br/>DC1]
c2[Collector<br/>DC2]
end
subgraph backends["Storage Backends"]
tempo[(Grafana<br/>Tempo)]
elastic[(Elastic<br/>APM)]
archive[(S3/GCS<br/>Archive)]
end
subgraph ui["Visualization"]
grafana[Grafana<br/>Dashboards]
end
v1 -->|OTLP| c1
v2 -->|OTLP| c1
s1 -->|OTLP| c2
s2 -->|OTLP| c2
c1 --> tempo
c1 --> elastic
c2 --> tempo
c2 --> archive
tempo --> grafana
elastic --> grafana
%% Note: simplified single-collector-per-DC topology shown for clarity
style validators fill:#b71c1c,stroke:#7f1d1d,color:#ffffff
style stock fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#ffffff
style collector fill:#bf360c,stroke:#8c2809,color:#ffffff
style backends fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#ffffff
style ui fill:#4a148c,stroke:#2e0d57,color:#ffffff
```
**Reading the diagram:**
- **Validator / Stock Nodes**: All xrpld nodes emit trace data via OTLP. Validators and stock nodes are grouped separately because they may reside in different network zones.
- **Collector Cluster (DC1, DC2)**: Regional collectors receive OTLP from nodes in their datacenter, apply processing (sampling, enrichment), and fan out to multiple backends.
- **Storage Backends**: Tempo and Elastic provide queryable trace storage; S3/GCS Archive provides long-term cold storage for compliance or post-incident analysis.
- **Grafana Dashboards**: The single visualization layer that queries both Tempo and Elastic, giving operators a unified view of all traces.
- **Data flow direction**: Nodes → Collectors → Storage → Grafana. Each arrow represents a network hop; minimizing collector-to-backend hops reduces latency.
> **Note**: Production deployments should use multiple collector instances behind a load balancer for high availability. The diagram shows a simplified single-collector topology for clarity.
---
## 7.4 Architecture Considerations
### 7.4.1 Collector Placement
| Strategy | Description | Pros | Cons |
| ------------- | -------------------- | ------------------------ | ----------------------- |
| **Sidecar** | Collector per node | Isolation, simple config | Resource overhead |
| **DaemonSet** | Collector per host | Shared resources | Complexity |
| **Gateway** | Central collector(s) | Centralized processing | Single point of failure |
**Recommendation**: Use **Gateway** pattern with regional collectors for xrpld networks:
- One collector cluster per datacenter/region
- Tail-based sampling at collector level
- Multiple export destinations for redundancy
### 7.4.2 Sampling Strategy
```mermaid
flowchart LR
subgraph head["Head Sampling (Node)"]
hs[Node-level head sampling<br/>fixed at 100%<br/>not configurable]
end
subgraph tail["Tail Sampling (Collector)"]
ts1[Keep all errors]
ts2[Keep slow >5s]
ts3[Keep 10% rest]
end
head --> tail
ts1 --> final[Final Traces]
ts2 --> final
ts3 --> final
style head fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#fff
style tail fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#fff
style hs fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#fff
style ts1 fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#fff
style ts2 fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#fff
style ts3 fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#fff
style final fill:#bf360c,stroke:#8c2809,color:#fff
```
**Reading the diagram:**
- **Head Sampling (Node)**: xrpld pins head sampling at 100% (sample everything) and does not expose a configurable ratio. This is intentional: a per-node ratio would let different nodes make divergent keep/drop decisions for the same distributed trace, producing broken/partial traces. xrpld uses a `ParentBased` sampler so spans inheriting a remote parent honor the upstream decision. Volume reduction is delegated to the collector's tail sampling.
- **Tail Sampling (Collector)**: The second filter -- the collector inspects completed traces and applies rules: keep all errors, keep anything slower than 5 seconds, and keep 10% of the remainder.
- **Arrow head → tail**: All head-sampled traces flow to the collector, where tail sampling further reduces volume while preserving the most valuable data.
- **Final Traces**: The output after both sampling stages; this is what gets stored and queried. The two-stage approach balances cost with debuggability.
### 7.4.3 Data Retention
| Environment | Hot Storage | Warm Storage | Cold Archive |
| ----------- | ----------- | ------------ | ------------ |
| Development | 24 hours | N/A | N/A |
| Staging | 7 days | N/A | N/A |
| Production | 7 days | 30 days | many years |
---
## 7.5 Integration Checklist
- [ ] Choose primary backend (Tempo recommended for cost/features)
- [ ] Deploy collector cluster with high availability
- [ ] Configure tail-based sampling for error/latency traces
- [ ] Set up Grafana dashboards for trace visualization
- [ ] Configure alerts for trace anomalies
- [ ] Establish data retention policies
- [ ] Test trace correlation with logs and metrics
---
## 7.6 Grafana Dashboard Examples
Pre-built dashboards for xrpld observability.
### 7.6.1 Consensus Health Dashboard
A Tempo-backed dashboard (uid `xrpld-consensus-health`) with four panels, all driven by TraceQL:
- **Consensus Round Duration** (timeseries, ms): average `consensus.round` span duration per node instance, with yellow/red thresholds at 4s/5s.
- **Phase Duration Breakdown** (barchart): average duration of `consensus.phase.*` spans grouped by span name.
- **Proposers per Round** (stat): average of the `span.proposers` attribute on `consensus.round` spans.
- **Recent Slow Rounds (>5s)** (table): `consensus.round` spans filtered to `duration > 5s`.
The underlying TraceQL queries are listed in section 7.7.3 and used throughout this doc.
### 7.6.2 Node Overview Dashboard
A Tempo-backed dashboard (uid `xrpld-node-overview`) with four panels:
- **Active Nodes** (stat): count of distinct `resource.service.instance.id` values seen for the `xrpld` service.
- **Total Transactions (1h)** (stat): count of `tx.receive` spans.
- **Error Rate** (gauge, percent): ratio of `status.code=error` spans to all spans, with yellow/red thresholds at 1%/5%.
- **Service Map** (nodeGraph): Tempo-generated service dependency graph.
### 7.6.3 Alert Rules
Grafana provisions three TraceQL-based alert rules (group `xrpld-tracing-alerts`, evaluated every 1m) against the Tempo datasource:
- **Consensus Round Slow** (warning, `for: 5m`): fires when average `consensus.round` duration exceeds 5s.
```
{resource.service.name="xrpld" && name="consensus.round"} | avg(duration) > 5s
```
- **RPC Error Rate Spike** (critical, `for: 2m`): fires when the error rate across `rpc.command.*` spans exceeds 5%.
```
{resource.service.name="xrpld" && name=~"rpc.command.*" && status.code=error} | rate() > 0.05
```
- **Transaction Throughput Drop** (warning, `for: 10m`): fires when the `tx.receive` span rate falls below 10/s.
```
{resource.service.name="xrpld" && name="tx.receive"} | rate() < 10
```
> **Note**: The first two rules use TraceQL aggregates (`avg(duration)`, `rate()`), which require Tempo 2.3+ with TraceQL metrics enabled. Verify aggregate query support in your Tempo version before provisioning.
---
## 7.7 PerfLog and Insight Correlation
> **OTLP** = OpenTelemetry Protocol
How to correlate OpenTelemetry traces with existing xrpld observability.
### 7.7.1 Correlation Architecture
```mermaid
flowchart TB
subgraph xrpld["xrpld Node"]
otel[OpenTelemetry<br/>Spans]
perflog[PerfLog<br/>JSON Logs]
insight[Beast Insight<br/>StatsD Metrics]
end
subgraph collectors["Data Collection"]
otelc[OTel Collector]
promtail[Promtail/Fluentd]
statsd[StatsD Exporter]
end
subgraph storage["Storage"]
tempo[(Tempo)]
loki[(Loki)]
prom[(Prometheus)]
end
subgraph grafana["Grafana"]
traces[Trace View]
logs[Log View]
metrics[Metrics View]
corr[Correlation<br/>Panel]
end
otel -->|OTLP| otelc --> tempo
perflog -->|JSON| promtail --> loki
insight -->|StatsD| statsd --> prom
tempo --> traces
loki --> logs
prom --> metrics
traces --> corr
logs --> corr
metrics --> corr
style xrpld fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#fff
style collectors fill:#bf360c,stroke:#8c2809,color:#fff
style storage fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#fff
style grafana fill:#4a148c,stroke:#2e0d57,color:#fff
style otel fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#fff
style perflog fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#fff
style insight fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#fff
style otelc fill:#bf360c,stroke:#8c2809,color:#fff
style promtail fill:#bf360c,stroke:#8c2809,color:#fff
style statsd fill:#bf360c,stroke:#8c2809,color:#fff
style tempo fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#fff
style loki fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#fff
style prom fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#fff
style traces fill:#4a148c,stroke:#2e0d57,color:#fff
style logs fill:#4a148c,stroke:#2e0d57,color:#fff
style metrics fill:#4a148c,stroke:#2e0d57,color:#fff
style corr fill:#4a148c,stroke:#2e0d57,color:#fff
```
**Reading the diagram:**
- **xrpld Node (three sources)**: A single node emits three independent data streams -- OpenTelemetry spans, PerfLog JSON logs, and Beast Insight StatsD metrics.
- **Data Collection layer**: Each stream has its own collector -- OTel Collector for spans, Promtail/Fluentd for logs, and a StatsD exporter for metrics. They operate independently.
- **Storage layer (Tempo, Loki, Prometheus)**: Each data type lands in a purpose-built store optimized for its query patterns (trace search, log grep, metric aggregation).
- **Grafana Correlation Panel**: The key integration point -- Grafana queries all three stores and links them via shared fields (`trace_id`, `tx_hash`, `ledger_seq`), enabling a single-pane debugging experience.
### 7.7.2 Correlation Fields
| Source | Field | Link To | Purpose |
| ----------- | ------------------- | ------------- | -------------------------- |
| **Trace** | `trace_id` | Logs | Find log entries for trace |
| **Trace** | `tx_hash` | Logs, Metrics | Find TX-related data |
| **Trace** | `ledger_seq` | Logs | Find ledger-related logs |
| **PerfLog** | `trace_id` (new) | Traces | Jump to trace from log |
| **PerfLog** | `ledger_seq` | Traces | Find consensus trace |
| **Insight** | `exemplar.trace_id` | Traces | Jump from metric spike |
### 7.7.3 Example: Debugging a Slow Transaction
**Step 1: Find the trace**
```
# In Grafana Explore with Tempo
{resource.service.name="xrpld" && span.tx_hash="ABC123..."}
```
**Step 2: Get the trace_id from the trace view**
```
Trace ID: 4bf92f3577b34da6a3ce929d0e0e4736
```
**Step 3: Find related PerfLog entries**
```
# In Grafana Explore with Loki
{job="xrpld"} |= "4bf92f3577b34da6a3ce929d0e0e4736"
```
**Step 4: Check Insight metrics for the time window**
```
# In Grafana with Prometheus
rate(xrpld_tx_applied_total[1m])
@ timestamp_from_trace
```
### 7.7.4 Unified Dashboard Example
A single dashboard (uid `xrpld-unified`) that ties traces, metrics, and logs together across the Tempo, Prometheus, and Loki datasources:
- **Transaction Latency (Traces)** (timeseries, Tempo): `histogram_over_time(duration)` of `tx.receive` spans.
- **Transaction Rate (Metrics)** (timeseries, Prometheus): `rate(xrpld_tx_received_total[5m])` per instance, with a data link that opens the matching `tx.receive` traces in Tempo.
- **Recent Logs** (logs, Loki): `{job="xrpld"} | json`.
- **Trace Search** (table, Tempo): all `xrpld` traces, with per-row data links on `traceID` that jump to the trace in Tempo and to the correlated logs in Loki (`{job="xrpld"} |= "<traceID>"`).
The cross-datasource data links are what make this a single-pane debugging view; the correlation fields they rely on are listed in section 7.7.2.
---
_Previous: [Implementation Phases](./06-implementation-phases.md)_ | _Next: [Appendix](./08-appendix.md)_ | _Back to: [Overview](./OpenTelemetryPlan.md)_

View File

@@ -1,194 +0,0 @@
# Appendix
> **Parent Document**: [OpenTelemetryPlan.md](./OpenTelemetryPlan.md)
> **Related**: [Observability Backends](./07-observability-backends.md)
---
## 8.1 Glossary
> **OTLP** = OpenTelemetry Protocol | **TxQ** = Transaction Queue
| Term | Definition |
| --------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------- |
| **Span** | A unit of work with start/end time, name, and attributes |
| **Trace** | A collection of spans representing a complete request flow |
| **Trace ID** | 128-bit unique identifier for a trace |
| **Span ID** | 64-bit unique identifier for a span within a trace |
| **Context** | Carrier for trace/span IDs across boundaries |
| **Propagator** | Component that injects/extracts context |
| **Sampler** | Decides which traces to record |
| **Exporter** | Sends spans to backend |
| **Collector** | Receives, processes, and forwards telemetry |
| **OTLP** | OpenTelemetry Protocol (wire format) |
| **W3C Trace Context** | Standard HTTP headers for trace propagation |
| **Baggage** | Key-value pairs propagated across service boundaries |
| **Resource** | Entity producing telemetry (service, host, etc.) |
| **Instrumentation** | Code that creates telemetry data |
### xrpld-Specific Terms
| Term | Definition |
| ----------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------- |
| **Overlay** | P2P network layer managing peer connections |
| **Consensus** | XRP Ledger consensus algorithm (RCL) |
| **Proposal** | Validator's suggested transaction set for a ledger |
| **Validation** | Validator's signature on a closed ledger |
| **HashRouter** | Component for transaction deduplication |
| **JobQueue** | Thread pool for asynchronous task execution |
| **PerfLog** | Existing performance logging system in xrpld |
| **Beast Insight** | Existing metrics framework in xrpld |
| **PathFinding** | Payment path computation engine for cross-currency payments |
| **TxQ** | Transaction queue managing fee-based prioritization |
| **LoadManager** | Dynamic fee escalation based on network load |
| **SHAMap** | SHA-256 hash-based map (Merkle trie variant) for ledger state |
---
## 8.2 Span Hierarchy Visualization
> **TxQ** = Transaction Queue
```mermaid
flowchart TB
subgraph trace["Trace: Transaction Lifecycle"]
rpc["rpc.request<br/>(entry point)"]
validate["tx.validate"]
relay["tx.relay<br/>(parent span)"]
subgraph peers["Peer Spans"]
p1["peer.send<br/>Peer A"]
p2["peer.send<br/>Peer B"]
p3["peer.send<br/>Peer C"]
end
subgraph pathfinding["PathFinding Spans"]
pathfind["pathfind.request"]
pathcomp["pathfind.compute"]
end
consensus["consensus.round"]
apply["tx.apply"]
subgraph txqueue["TxQ Spans"]
txq["txq.enqueue"]
txqApply["txq.apply"]
end
feeCalc["fee.escalate"]
end
subgraph validators["Validator Spans"]
valFetch["validator.list.fetch"]
valManifest["validator.manifest"]
end
rpc --> validate
rpc --> pathfind
pathfind --> pathcomp
validate --> relay
relay --> p1
relay --> p2
relay --> p3
p1 -.->|"context propagation"| consensus
consensus --> apply
apply --> txq
txq --> txqApply
txq --> feeCalc
style trace fill:#0f172a,stroke:#020617,color:#fff
style peers fill:#1e3a8a,stroke:#172554,color:#fff
style pathfinding fill:#134e4a,stroke:#0f766e,color:#fff
style txqueue fill:#064e3b,stroke:#047857,color:#fff
style validators fill:#4c1d95,stroke:#6d28d9,color:#fff
style rpc fill:#1d4ed8,stroke:#1e40af,color:#fff
style validate fill:#047857,stroke:#064e3b,color:#fff
style relay fill:#047857,stroke:#064e3b,color:#fff
style p1 fill:#0e7490,stroke:#155e75,color:#fff
style p2 fill:#0e7490,stroke:#155e75,color:#fff
style p3 fill:#0e7490,stroke:#155e75,color:#fff
style consensus fill:#fef3c7,stroke:#fde68a,color:#1e293b
style apply fill:#047857,stroke:#064e3b,color:#fff
style pathfind fill:#0e7490,stroke:#155e75,color:#fff
style pathcomp fill:#0e7490,stroke:#155e75,color:#fff
style txq fill:#047857,stroke:#064e3b,color:#fff
style txqApply fill:#047857,stroke:#064e3b,color:#fff
style feeCalc fill:#047857,stroke:#064e3b,color:#fff
style valFetch fill:#6d28d9,stroke:#4c1d95,color:#fff
style valManifest fill:#6d28d9,stroke:#4c1d95,color:#fff
```
**Reading the diagram:**
- **rpc.request (blue, top)**: The entry point — every traced transaction starts as an RPC call; this root span is the parent of all downstream work.
- **tx.validate and pathfind.request (green/teal, first fork)**: The RPC request fans out into transaction validation and, for cross-currency payments, a PathFinding branch (`pathfind.request` -> `pathfind.compute`).
- **tx.relay -> Peer Spans (teal, middle)**: After validation, the transaction is relayed to peers A, B, and C in parallel; each `peer.send` is a sibling child span showing fan-out across the network.
- **context propagation (dashed arrow)**: The dotted line from `peer.send Peer A` to `consensus.round` represents the trace context crossing a node boundary — the receiving validator picks up the same `trace_id` and continues the trace.
- **consensus.round -> tx.apply -> TxQ Spans (green, lower)**: Once consensus accepts the transaction, it is applied to the ledger; the TxQ spans (`txq.enqueue`, `txq.apply`, `fee.escalate`) capture queue depth and fee escalation behavior.
- **Validator Spans (purple, detached)**: `validator.list.fetch` and `validator.manifest` are independent workflows for UNL management — they run on their own traces and are linked to consensus via Span Links, not parent-child relationships.
---
## 8.3 References
> **OTLP** = OpenTelemetry Protocol
### OpenTelemetry Resources
1. [OpenTelemetry C++ SDK](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-cpp)
2. [OpenTelemetry Specification](https://opentelemetry.io/docs/specs/otel/)
3. [OpenTelemetry Collector](https://opentelemetry.io/docs/collector/)
4. [OTLP Protocol Specification](https://opentelemetry.io/docs/specs/otlp/)
### Standards
5. [W3C Trace Context](https://www.w3.org/TR/trace-context/)
6. [W3C Baggage](https://www.w3.org/TR/baggage/)
7. [Protocol Buffers](https://protobuf.dev/)
### xrpld Resources
8. [xrpld Source Code](https://github.com/XRPLF/rippled)
9. [XRP Ledger Documentation](https://xrpl.org/docs/)
10. [xrpld Overlay README](https://github.com/XRPLF/rippled/blob/develop/src/xrpld/overlay/README.md)
11. [xrpld RPC README](https://github.com/XRPLF/rippled/blob/develop/src/xrpld/rpc/README.md)
12. [xrpld Consensus README](https://github.com/XRPLF/rippled/blob/develop/src/xrpld/app/consensus/README.md)
---
## 8.4 Version History
| Version | Date | Author | Changes |
| ------- | ---------- | ------ | -------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 1.0 | 2026-02-12 | - | Initial implementation plan |
| 1.1 | 2026-02-13 | - | Refactored into modular documents |
| 1.2 | 2026-03-24 | - | Review fixes: accuracy corrections, cross-document consistency |
---
## 8.5 Document Index
### Plan Documents
| Document | Description |
| ---------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------- |
| [OpenTelemetryPlan.md](./OpenTelemetryPlan.md) | Master overview and executive summary |
| [00-tracing-fundamentals.md](./00-tracing-fundamentals.md) | Distributed tracing concepts and OTel primer |
| [01-architecture-analysis.md](./01-architecture-analysis.md) | xrpld architecture and trace points |
| [02-design-decisions.md](./02-design-decisions.md) | SDK selection, exporters, span conventions |
| [03-implementation-strategy.md](./03-implementation-strategy.md) | Directory structure, performance analysis |
| [05-configuration-reference.md](./05-configuration-reference.md) | xrpld config, CMake, Collector configs |
| [06-implementation-phases.md](./06-implementation-phases.md) | Timeline, tasks, risks, success metrics |
| [07-observability-backends.md](./07-observability-backends.md) | Backend selection and architecture |
| [08-appendix.md](./08-appendix.md) | Glossary, references, version history |
| [presentation.md](./presentation.md) | Slide deck for OTel plan overview |
### Task Lists
| Document | Description |
| ------------------------------------ | --------------------------------------------------- |
| [presentation.md](./presentation.md) | Presentation slides for OpenTelemetry plan overview |
---
_Previous: [Observability Backends](./07-observability-backends.md)_ | _Back to: [Overview](./OpenTelemetryPlan.md)_

View File

@@ -1,199 +0,0 @@
# [OpenTelemetry](00-tracing-fundamentals.md) Distributed Tracing Implementation Plan for xrpld (xrpld)
## Executive Summary
> **OTLP** = OpenTelemetry Protocol
This document provides a comprehensive implementation plan for integrating OpenTelemetry distributed tracing into the xrpld XRP Ledger node software. The plan addresses the unique challenges of a decentralized peer-to-peer system where trace context must propagate across network boundaries between independent nodes.
### Key Benefits
- **End-to-end transaction visibility**: Track transactions from submission through consensus to ledger inclusion
- **Consensus round analysis**: Understand timing and behavior of consensus phases across validators
- **RPC performance insights**: Identify slow handlers and optimize response times
- **Network topology understanding**: Visualize message propagation patterns between peers
- **Incident debugging**: Correlate events across distributed nodes during issues
### Estimated Performance Overhead
| Metric | Overhead | Notes |
| ------------- | ---------- | ----------------------------------- |
| CPU | 1-3% | Span creation and attribute setting |
| Memory | 2-5 MB | Batch buffer for pending spans |
| Network | 10-50 KB/s | Compressed OTLP export to collector |
| Latency (p99) | <2% | With proper sampling configuration |
---
## Document Structure
This implementation plan is organized into modular documents for easier navigation:
<div align="center">
```mermaid
flowchart TB
overview["📋 OpenTelemetryPlan.md<br/>(This Document)"]
subgraph fundamentals["Fundamentals"]
fund["00-tracing-fundamentals.md"]
end
subgraph analysis["Analysis & Design"]
arch["01-architecture-analysis.md"]
design["02-design-decisions.md"]
end
subgraph impl["Implementation"]
strategy["03-implementation-strategy.md"]
config["05-configuration-reference.md"]
end
subgraph deploy["Deployment & Planning"]
phases["06-implementation-phases.md"]
backends["07-observability-backends.md"]
appendix["08-appendix.md"]
end
overview --> fundamentals
overview --> analysis
overview --> impl
overview --> deploy
fund --> arch
arch --> design
design --> strategy
strategy --> config
config --> phases
phases --> backends
backends --> appendix
style overview fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#fff,stroke-width:2px
style fundamentals fill:#00695c,stroke:#004d40,color:#fff
style fund fill:#00695c,stroke:#004d40,color:#fff
style analysis fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#fff
style impl fill:#bf360c,stroke:#8c2809,color:#fff
style deploy fill:#4a148c,stroke:#2e0d57,color:#fff
style arch fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#fff
style design fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#fff
style strategy fill:#bf360c,stroke:#8c2809,color:#fff
style config fill:#bf360c,stroke:#8c2809,color:#fff
style phases fill:#4a148c,stroke:#2e0d57,color:#fff
style backends fill:#4a148c,stroke:#2e0d57,color:#fff
style appendix fill:#4a148c,stroke:#2e0d57,color:#fff
```
</div>
---
## Table of Contents
| Section | Document | Description |
| ------- | ---------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| **0** | [Tracing Fundamentals](./00-tracing-fundamentals.md) | Distributed tracing concepts, span relationships, context propagation |
| **1** | [Architecture Analysis](./01-architecture-analysis.md) | xrpld component analysis, trace points, instrumentation priorities |
| **2** | [Design Decisions](./02-design-decisions.md) | SDK selection, exporters, span naming, attributes, context propagation |
| **3** | [Implementation Strategy](./03-implementation-strategy.md) | Directory structure, key principles, performance optimization |
| **5** | [Configuration Reference](./05-configuration-reference.md) | xrpld config, CMake integration, Collector configurations |
| **6** | [Implementation Phases](./06-implementation-phases.md) | 5-phase timeline, tasks, risks, success metrics |
| **7** | [Observability Backends](./07-observability-backends.md) | Backend selection guide and production architecture |
| **8** | [Appendix](./08-appendix.md) | Glossary, references, version history |
---
## 0. Tracing Fundamentals
This document introduces distributed tracing concepts for readers unfamiliar with the domain. It covers what traces and spans are, how parent-child and follows-from relationships model causality, how context propagates across service boundaries, and how sampling controls data volume. It also maps these concepts to xrpld-specific scenarios like transaction relay and consensus.
➡️ **[Read Tracing Fundamentals](./00-tracing-fundamentals.md)**
---
## 1. Architecture Analysis
> **WS** = WebSocket | **TxQ** = Transaction Queue
The xrpld node consists of several key components that require instrumentation for comprehensive distributed tracing. The main areas include the RPC server (HTTP/WebSocket), Overlay P2P network, Consensus mechanism (RCLConsensus), JobQueue for async task execution, PathFinding, Transaction Queue (TxQ), fee escalation (LoadManager), ledger acquisition, validator management, and existing observability infrastructure (PerfLog, Insight/StatsD, Journal logging).
Key trace points span across transaction submission via RPC, peer-to-peer message propagation, consensus round execution, ledger building, path computation, transaction queue behavior, fee escalation, and validator health. The implementation prioritizes high-value, low-risk components first: RPC handlers provide immediate value with minimal risk, while consensus tracing requires careful implementation to avoid timing impacts.
➡️ **[Read full Architecture Analysis](./01-architecture-analysis.md)**
---
## 2. Design Decisions
> **OTLP** = OpenTelemetry Protocol | **CNCF** = Cloud Native Computing Foundation
The OpenTelemetry C++ SDK is selected for its CNCF backing, active development, and native performance characteristics. Traces are exported via OTLP/gRPC (primary) or OTLP/HTTP (fallback) to an OpenTelemetry Collector, which provides flexible routing and sampling.
Span naming follows a hierarchical `<component>.<operation>` convention (e.g., `rpc.submit`, `tx.relay`, `consensus.round`). Context propagation uses W3C Trace Context headers for HTTP and embedded Protocol Buffer fields for P2P messages. The implementation coexists with existing PerfLog and Insight observability systems through correlation IDs.
**Data Collection & Privacy**: Telemetry collects only operational metadata (timing, counts, hashes) — never sensitive content (private keys, balances, amounts, raw payloads). Privacy protection includes account hashing, configurable redaction, sampling, and collector-level filtering. Node operators retain full control over telemetry configuration.
➡️ **[Read full Design Decisions](./02-design-decisions.md)**
---
## 3. Implementation Strategy
The telemetry code is organized under `include/xrpl/telemetry/` for headers and `src/libxrpl/telemetry/` for implementation. Key principles include RAII-based span management via `SpanGuard` (with `discard()` for dropping unwanted spans), a `FilteringSpanProcessor` that intercepts `OnEnd()` to prevent discarded spans from entering the export pipeline, conditional compilation with `XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY`, and minimal runtime overhead through batch processing and efficient sampling.
Performance optimization strategies include head sampling fixed at 100% (intentionally not configurable, so trace keep/drop decisions stay coherent across nodes), tail-based sampling at the collector for errors and slow traces to reduce volume, batch export to reduce network overhead, and conditional instrumentation that compiles to no-ops when disabled.
➡️ **[Read full Implementation Strategy](./03-implementation-strategy.md)**
---
## 5. Configuration Reference
> **OTLP** = OpenTelemetry Protocol | **APM** = Application Performance Monitoring
Configuration is handled through the `[telemetry]` section in `xrpld.cfg` with options for enabling/disabling, exporter selection, endpoint configuration, sampling ratios, and component-level filtering. CMake integration includes a `XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY` option for compile-time control.
OpenTelemetry Collector configurations are provided for development and production (with tail-based sampling, Tempo, and Elastic APM). Docker Compose examples enable quick local development environment setup.
➡️ **[View full Configuration Reference](./05-configuration-reference.md)**
---
## 6. Implementation Phases
The implementation spans 9 weeks across 5 phases:
| Phase | Duration | Focus | Key Deliverables |
| ----- | --------- | ------------------- | --------------------------------------------------- |
| 1 | Weeks 1-2 | Core Infrastructure | SDK integration, Telemetry interface, Configuration |
| 2 | Weeks 3-4 | RPC Tracing | HTTP context extraction, Handler instrumentation |
| 3 | Weeks 5-6 | Transaction Tracing | Protocol Buffer context, Relay propagation |
| 4 | Weeks 7-8 | Consensus Tracing | Round spans, Proposal/validation tracing |
| 5 | Week 9 | Documentation | Runbook, Dashboards, Training |
**Total Effort**: 47 person-days (2 developers working in parallel)
➡️ **[View full Implementation Phases](./06-implementation-phases.md)**
---
## 7. Observability Backends
> **APM** = Application Performance Monitoring | **GCS** = Google Cloud Storage
Grafana Tempo is recommended for all environments due to its cost-effectiveness and Grafana integration, while Elastic APM is ideal for organizations with existing Elastic infrastructure.
The recommended production architecture uses a gateway collector pattern with regional collectors performing tail-based sampling, routing traces to multiple backends (Tempo for primary storage, Elastic for log correlation, S3/GCS for long-term archive).
➡️ **[View Observability Backend Recommendations](./07-observability-backends.md)**
---
## 8. Appendix
The appendix contains a glossary of OpenTelemetry and xrpld-specific terms, references to external documentation and specifications, version history for this implementation plan, and a complete document index.
➡️ **[View Appendix](./08-appendix.md)**
---
_This document provides a comprehensive implementation plan for integrating OpenTelemetry distributed tracing into the xrpld XRP Ledger node software. For detailed information on any section, follow the links to the corresponding sub-documents._

View File

@@ -1,673 +0,0 @@
# OpenTelemetry Distributed Tracing for xrpld
---
## Slide 1: Introduction
> **CNCF** = Cloud Native Computing Foundation
### What is OpenTelemetry?
OpenTelemetry is an open-source, CNCF-backed observability framework for distributed tracing, metrics, and logs.
### Why OpenTelemetry for xrpld?
- **End-to-End Transaction Visibility**: Track transactions from submission → consensus → ledger inclusion
- **Cross-Node Correlation**: Follow requests across multiple independent nodes using a unique `trace_id`
- **Consensus Round Analysis**: Understand timing and behavior across validators
- **Incident Debugging**: Correlate events across distributed nodes during issues
```mermaid
flowchart LR
A["Node A<br/>tx.receive<br/>trace_id: abc123"] --> B["Node B<br/>tx.relay<br/>trace_id: abc123"] --> C["Node C<br/>tx.validate<br/>trace_id: abc123"] --> D["Node D<br/>ledger.apply<br/>trace_id: abc123"]
style A fill:#1565c0,stroke:#0d47a1,color:#fff
style B fill:#2e7d32,stroke:#1b5e20,color:#fff
style C fill:#2e7d32,stroke:#1b5e20,color:#fff
style D fill:#e65100,stroke:#bf360c,color:#fff
```
**Reading the diagram:**
- **Node A (blue, leftmost)**: The originating node that first receives the transaction and assigns a new `trace_id: abc123`; this ID becomes the correlation key for the entire distributed trace.
- **Node B and Node C (green, middle)**: Relay and validation nodes — each creates its own span but carries the same `trace_id`, so their work is linked to the original submission without any central coordinator.
- **Node D (orange, rightmost)**: The final node that applies the transaction to the ledger; the trace now spans the full lifecycle from submission to ledger inclusion.
- **Left-to-right flow**: The horizontal progression shows the real-world message path — a transaction hops from node to node, and the shared `trace_id` stitches all hops into a single queryable trace.
> **Trace ID: abc123** — All nodes share the same trace, enabling cross-node correlation.
---
## Slide 2: OpenTelemetry vs Open Source Alternatives
> **CNCF** = Cloud Native Computing Foundation
| Feature | OpenTelemetry | Jaeger | Zipkin | SkyWalking | Pinpoint | Prometheus |
| ------------------- | ---------------- | ---------------- | ------------------ | ---------- | ---------- | ---------- |
| **Tracing** | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | NO |
| **Metrics** | YES | NO | NO | YES | YES | YES |
| **Logs** | YES | NO | NO | YES | NO | NO |
| **C++ SDK** | YES Official | YES (Deprecated) | YES (Unmaintained) | NO | NO | YES |
| **Vendor Neutral** | YES Primary goal | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO |
| **Instrumentation** | Manual + Auto | Manual | Manual | Auto-first | Auto-first | Manual |
| **Backend** | Any (exporters) | Self | Self | Self | Self | Self |
| **CNCF Status** | Incubating | Graduated | NO | Incubating | NO | Graduated |
> **Why OpenTelemetry?** It's the only actively maintained, full-featured C++ option with vendor neutrality — allowing export to Tempo, Prometheus, Grafana, or any commercial backend without changing instrumentation.
---
## Slide 3: Adoption Scope — Traces Only (Current Plan)
OpenTelemetry supports three signal types: **Traces**, **Metrics**, and **Logs**. xrpld already captures metrics (StatsD via Beast Insight) and logs (Journal/PerfLog). The question is: how much of OTel do we adopt?
> **Scenario A**: Add distributed tracing. Keep StatsD for metrics and Journal for logs.
```mermaid
flowchart LR
subgraph xrpld["xrpld Process"]
direction TB
OTel["OTel SDK<br/>(Traces)"]
Insight["Beast Insight<br/>(StatsD Metrics)"]
Journal["Journal + PerfLog<br/>(Logging)"]
end
OTel -->|"OTLP"| Collector["OTel Collector"]
Insight -->|"UDP"| StatsD["StatsD Server"]
Journal -->|"File I/O"| LogFile["perf.log / debug.log"]
Collector --> Tempo["Tempo"]
StatsD --> Graphite["Graphite / Grafana"]
LogFile --> Loki["Loki (optional)"]
style xrpld fill:#424242,stroke:#212121,color:#fff
style OTel fill:#2e7d32,stroke:#1b5e20,color:#fff
style Insight fill:#1565c0,stroke:#0d47a1,color:#fff
style Journal fill:#e65100,stroke:#bf360c,color:#fff
style Collector fill:#2e7d32,stroke:#1b5e20,color:#fff
```
| Aspect | Details |
| ------------------------------ | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| **What changes for operators** | Deploy OTel Collector + trace backend. Existing StatsD and log pipelines stay as-is. |
| **Codebase impact** | New `Telemetry` module (~1500 LOC). Beast Insight and Journal untouched. |
| **New capabilities** | Cross-node trace correlation, span-based debugging, request lifecycle visibility. |
| **What we still can't do** | Correlate metrics with specific traces natively. StatsD metrics remain fire-and-forget with no trace exemplars. |
| **Maintenance burden** | Three separate observability systems to maintain (OTel + StatsD + Journal). |
| **Risk** | Lowest — additive change, no existing systems disturbed. |
---
## Slide 4: Future Adoption — Metrics & Logs via OTel
### Scenario B: + OTel Metrics (Replace StatsD)
> Migrate StatsD to OTel Metrics API, exposing Prometheus-compatible metrics. Remove Beast Insight.
```mermaid
flowchart LR
subgraph xrpld["xrpld Process"]
direction TB
OTel["OTel SDK<br/>(Traces + Metrics)"]
Journal["Journal + PerfLog<br/>(Logging)"]
end
OTel -->|"OTLP"| Collector["OTel Collector"]
Journal -->|"File I/O"| LogFile["perf.log / debug.log"]
Collector --> Tempo["Tempo<br/>(Traces)"]
Collector --> Prom["Prometheus<br/>(Metrics)"]
LogFile --> Loki["Loki (optional)"]
style xrpld fill:#424242,stroke:#212121,color:#fff
style OTel fill:#2e7d32,stroke:#1b5e20,color:#fff
style Journal fill:#e65100,stroke:#bf360c,color:#fff
style Collector fill:#2e7d32,stroke:#1b5e20,color:#fff
```
- **Better metrics?** Yes — Prometheus gives native histograms (p50/p95/p99), multi-dimensional labels, and exemplars linking metric spikes to traces.
- **Codebase**: Remove `Beast::Insight` + `StatsDCollector` (~2000 LOC). Single SDK for traces and metrics.
- **Operator effort**: Rewrite dashboards from StatsD/Graphite queries to PromQL. Run both in parallel during transition.
- **Risk**: Medium — operators must migrate monitoring infrastructure.
### Scenario C: + OTel Logs (Full Stack)
> Also replace Journal logging with OTel Logs API. Single SDK for everything.
```mermaid
flowchart LR
subgraph xrpld["xrpld Process"]
OTel["OTel SDK<br/>(Traces + Metrics + Logs)"]
end
OTel -->|"OTLP"| Collector["OTel Collector"]
Collector --> Tempo["Tempo<br/>(Traces)"]
Collector --> Prom["Prometheus<br/>(Metrics)"]
Collector --> Loki["Loki / Elastic<br/>(Logs)"]
style xrpld fill:#424242,stroke:#212121,color:#fff
style OTel fill:#2e7d32,stroke:#1b5e20,color:#fff
style Collector fill:#2e7d32,stroke:#1b5e20,color:#fff
```
- **Structured logging**: OTel Logs API outputs structured records with `trace_id`, `span_id`, severity, and attributes by design.
- **Full correlation**: Every log line carries `trace_id`. Click trace → see logs. Click metric spike → see trace → see logs.
- **Codebase**: Remove Beast Insight (~2000 LOC) + simplify Journal/PerfLog (~3000 LOC). One dependency instead of three.
- **Risk**: Highest — `beast::Journal` is deeply embedded in every component. Large refactor. OTel C++ Logs API is newer (stable since v1.11, less battle-tested).
### Recommendation
```mermaid
flowchart LR
A["Phase 1<br/><b>Traces Only</b><br/>(Current Plan)"] --> B["Phase 2<br/><b>+ Metrics</b><br/>(Replace StatsD)"] --> C["Phase 3<br/><b>+ Logs</b><br/>(Full OTel)"]
style A fill:#2e7d32,stroke:#1b5e20,color:#fff
style B fill:#1565c0,stroke:#0d47a1,color:#fff
style C fill:#e65100,stroke:#bf360c,color:#fff
```
| Phase | Signal | Strategy | Risk |
| -------------------- | --------- | -------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ |
| **Phase 1** (now) | Traces | Add OTel traces. Keep StatsD and Journal. Prove value. | Low |
| **Phase 2** (future) | + Metrics | Migrate StatsD → Prometheus via OTel. Remove Beast Insight. | Medium |
| **Phase 3** (future) | + Logs | Adopt OTel Logs API. Align with structured logging initiative. | High |
> **Key Takeaway**: Start with traces (unique value, lowest risk), then incrementally adopt metrics and logs as the OTel infrastructure proves itself.
---
## Slide 5: Comparison with xrpld's Existing Solutions
### Current Observability Stack
| Aspect | PerfLog (JSON) | StatsD (Metrics) | OpenTelemetry (NEW) |
| --------------------- | --------------------- | --------------------- | --------------------------- |
| **Type** | Logging | Metrics | Distributed Tracing |
| **Scope** | Single node | Single node | **Cross-node** |
| **Data** | JSON log entries | Counters, gauges | Spans with context |
| **Correlation** | By timestamp | By metric name | By `trace_id` |
| **Overhead** | Low (file I/O) | Low (UDP) | Low-Medium (configurable) |
| **Question Answered** | "What happened here?" | "How many? How fast?" | **"What was the journey?"** |
### Use Case Matrix
| Scenario | PerfLog | StatsD | OpenTelemetry |
| -------------------------------- | ------- | ------ | ------------- |
| "How many TXs per second?" | ❌ | ✅ | ❌ |
| "Why was this specific TX slow?" | ⚠️ | ❌ | ✅ |
| "Which node delayed consensus?" | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ |
| "Show TX journey across 5 nodes" | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ |
> **Key Insight**: In the **traces-only** approach (Phase 1), OpenTelemetry **complements** existing systems. In future phases, OTel metrics and logs could **replace** StatsD and Journal respectively — see Slides 3-4 for the full adoption roadmap.
---
## Slide 6: Architecture
> **OTLP** = OpenTelemetry Protocol | **WS** = WebSocket
### High-Level Integration Architecture
```mermaid
flowchart TB
subgraph xrpld["xrpld Node"]
subgraph services["Core Services"]
direction LR
RPC["RPC Server<br/>(HTTP/WS)"] ~~~ Overlay["Overlay<br/>(P2P Network)"] ~~~ Consensus["Consensus<br/>(RCLConsensus)"]
end
Telemetry["Telemetry Module<br/>(OpenTelemetry SDK)"]
services --> Telemetry
end
Telemetry -->|OTLP/gRPC| Collector["OTel Collector"]
Collector --> Tempo["Grafana Tempo"]
Collector --> Elastic["Elastic APM"]
style xrpld fill:#424242,stroke:#212121,color:#fff
style services fill:#1565c0,stroke:#0d47a1,color:#fff
style Telemetry fill:#2e7d32,stroke:#1b5e20,color:#fff
style Collector fill:#e65100,stroke:#bf360c,color:#fff
```
**Reading the diagram:**
- **Core Services (blue, top)**: RPC Server, Overlay, and Consensus are the three primary components that generate trace data — they represent the entry points for client requests, peer messages, and consensus rounds respectively.
- **Telemetry Module (green, middle)**: The OpenTelemetry SDK sits below the core services and receives span data from all three; it acts as a single collection point within the xrpld process.
- **OTel Collector (orange, center)**: An external process that receives spans over OTLP/gRPC from the Telemetry Module; it decouples xrpld from backend choices and handles batching, sampling, and routing.
- **Backends (bottom row)**: Tempo and Elastic APM are interchangeable — the Collector fans out to any combination, so operators can switch backends without modifying xrpld code.
- **Top-to-bottom flow**: Data flows from instrumented code down through the SDK, out over the network to the Collector, and finally into storage/visualization backends.
### Context Propagation
```mermaid
sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant NodeA as Node A
participant NodeB as Node B
Client->>NodeA: Submit TX (no context)
Note over NodeA: Creates trace_id: abc123<br/>span: tx.receive
NodeA->>NodeB: Relay TX<br/>(traceparent: abc123)
Note over NodeB: Links to trace_id: abc123<br/>span: tx.relay
```
- **HTTP/RPC**: W3C Trace Context headers (`traceparent`)
- **P2P Messages**: Protocol Buffer extension fields
---
## Slide 7: Implementation Plan
### 5-Phase Rollout (9 Weeks)
> **Note**: Dates shown are relative to project start, not calendar dates.
```mermaid
gantt
title Implementation Timeline
dateFormat YYYY-MM-DD
axisFormat Week %W
section Phase 1
Core Infrastructure :p1, 2024-01-01, 2w
section Phase 2
RPC Tracing :p2, after p1, 2w
section Phase 3
Transaction Tracing :p3, after p2, 2w
section Phase 4
Consensus Tracing :p4, after p3, 2w
section Phase 5
Documentation :p5, after p4, 1w
```
### Phase Details
| Phase | Focus | Key Deliverables | Effort |
| ----- | ------------------- | -------------------------------------------- | ------- |
| 1 | Core Infrastructure | SDK integration, Telemetry interface, Config | 10 days |
| 2 | RPC Tracing | HTTP context extraction, Handler spans | 10 days |
| 3 | Transaction Tracing | Protobuf context, P2P relay propagation | 10 days |
| 4 | Consensus Tracing | Round spans, Proposal/validation tracing | 10 days |
| 5 | Documentation | Runbook, Dashboards, Training | 7 days |
**Total Effort**: ~47 developer-days (2 developers)
> **Future Phases** (not in current scope): After traces are stable, OTel metrics can replace StatsD (~3 weeks), and OTel logs can replace Journal (~4 weeks, aligned with structured logging initiative). See Slides 3-4 for the full adoption roadmap.
---
## Slide 8: Performance Overhead
> **OTLP** = OpenTelemetry Protocol
### Estimated System Impact
| Metric | Overhead | Notes |
| ----------------- | ---------- | ------------------------------------------------ |
| **CPU** | 1-3% | Span creation and attribute setting |
| **Memory** | ~10 MB | SDK statics + batch buffer + worker thread stack |
| **Network** | 10-50 KB/s | Compressed OTLP export to collector |
| **Latency (p99)** | <2% | With proper sampling configuration |
#### How We Arrived at These Numbers
**Assumptions (XRPL mainnet baseline)**:
| Parameter | Value | Source |
| ------------------------- | ---------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| Transaction throughput | ~25 TPS (peaks to ~50) | Mainnet average |
| Default peers per node | 21 | `peerfinder/detail/Tuning.h` (`defaultMaxPeers`) |
| Consensus round frequency | ~1 round / 3-4 seconds | `ConsensusParms.h` (`ledgerMIN_CONSENSUS=1950ms`) |
| Proposers per round | ~20-35 | Mainnet UNL size |
| P2P message rate | ~160 msgs/sec | See message breakdown below |
| Avg TX processing time | ~200 μs | Profiled baseline |
| Single span creation cost | 500-1000 ns | OTel C++ SDK benchmarks (see [3.5.4](./03-implementation-strategy.md#354-performance-data-sources)) |
**P2P message breakdown** (per node, mainnet):
| Message Type | Rate | Derivation |
| ------------- | ------------ | --------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| TMTransaction | ~100/sec | ~25 TPS × ~4 relay hops per TX, deduplicated by HashRouter |
| TMValidation | ~50/sec | ~35 validators × ~1 validation/3s round ~12/sec, plus relay fan-out |
| TMProposeSet | ~10/sec | ~35 proposers / 3s round ~12/round, clustered in establish phase |
| **Total** | **~160/sec** | **Only traced message types counted** |
**CPU (1-3%) — Calculation**:
Per-transaction tracing cost breakdown:
| Operation | Cost | Notes |
| ----------------------------------------------- | ----------- | ------------------------------------------ |
| `tx.receive` span (create + end + 4 attributes) | ~1400 ns | ~1000ns create + ~200ns end + 4×50ns attrs |
| `tx.validate` span | ~1200 ns | ~1000ns create + ~200ns for 2 attributes |
| `tx.relay` span | ~1200 ns | ~1000ns create + ~200ns for 2 attributes |
| Context injection into P2P message | ~200 ns | Serialize trace_id + span_id into protobuf |
| **Total per TX** | **~4.0 μs** | |
> **CPU overhead**: 4.0 μs / 200 μs baseline = **~2.0% per transaction**. Under high load with consensus + RPC spans overlapping, reaches ~3%. Consensus itself adds only ~36 μs per 3-second round (~0.001%), so the TX path dominates. On production server hardware (3+ GHz Xeon), span creation drops to ~500-600 ns, bringing per-TX cost to ~2.6 μs (~1.3%). See [Section 3.5.4](./03-implementation-strategy.md#354-performance-data-sources) for benchmark sources.
**Memory (~10 MB) — Calculation**:
| Component | Size | Notes |
| --------------------------------------------- | ------------------ | ------------------------------------- |
| TracerProvider + Exporter (gRPC channel init) | ~320 KB | Allocated once at startup |
| BatchSpanProcessor (circular buffer) | ~16 KB | 2049 × 8-byte AtomicUniquePtr entries |
| BatchSpanProcessor (worker thread stack) | ~8 MB | Default Linux thread stack size |
| Active spans (in-flight, max ~1000) | ~500-800 KB | ~500-800 bytes/span × 1000 concurrent |
| Export queue (batch buffer, max 2048 spans) | ~1 MB | ~500 bytes/span × 2048 queue depth |
| Thread-local context storage (~100 threads) | ~6.4 KB | ~64 bytes/thread |
| **Total** | **~10 MB ceiling** | |
> Memory plateaus once the export queue fills — the `max_queue_size=2048` config bounds growth.
> The worker thread stack (~8 MB) dominates the static footprint but is virtual memory; actual RSS
> depends on stack usage (typically much less). Active spans are larger than originally estimated
> (~500-800 bytes) because the OTel SDK `Span` object includes a mutex (~40 bytes), `SpanData`
> recordable (~250 bytes base), and `std::map`-based attribute storage (~200-500 bytes for 3-5
> string attributes). See [Section 3.5.4](./03-implementation-strategy.md#354-performance-data-sources) for source references.
**Network (10-50 KB/s) — Calculation**:
Two sources of network overhead:
**(A) OTLP span export to Collector:**
| Sampling Rate | Effective Spans/sec | Avg Span Size (compressed) | Bandwidth |
| -------------------------- | ------------------- | -------------------------- | ------------ |
| 100% (dev only) | ~500 | ~500 bytes | ~250 KB/s |
| **10% (recommended prod)** | **~50** | **~500 bytes** | **~25 KB/s** |
| 1% (minimal) | ~5 | ~500 bytes | ~2.5 KB/s |
> The ~500 spans/sec at 100% comes from: ~100 TX spans + ~160 P2P context spans + ~23 consensus spans/round + ~50 RPC spans = ~500/sec. OTLP protobuf with gzip compression yields ~500 bytes/span average.
**(B) P2P trace context overhead** (added to existing messages, always-on regardless of sampling):
| Message Type | Rate | Context Size | Bandwidth |
| ------------- | -------- | ------------ | ------------- |
| TMTransaction | ~100/sec | 29 bytes | ~2.9 KB/s |
| TMValidation | ~50/sec | 29 bytes | ~1.5 KB/s |
| TMProposeSet | ~10/sec | 29 bytes | ~0.3 KB/s |
| **Total P2P** | | | **~4.7 KB/s** |
> **Combined**: 25 KB/s (OTLP export at 10%) + 5 KB/s (P2P context) ≈ **~30 KB/s typical**. The 10-50 KB/s range covers 10-20% sampling under normal to peak mainnet load.
**Latency (<2%) — Calculation**:
| Path | Tracing Cost | Baseline | Overhead |
| ------------------------------ | ------------ | -------- | -------- |
| Fast RPC (e.g., `server_info`) | 2.75 μs | ~1 ms | 0.275% |
| Slow RPC (e.g., `path_find`) | 2.75 μs | ~100 ms | 0.003% |
| Transaction processing | 4.0 μs | ~200 μs | 2.0% |
| Consensus round | 36 μs | ~3 sec | 0.001% |
> At p99, even the worst case (TX processing at 2.0%) is within the 1-3% range. RPC and consensus overhead are negligible. On production hardware, TX overhead drops to ~1.3%.
### Per-Message Overhead (Context Propagation)
Each P2P message carries trace context with the following overhead:
| Field | Size | Description |
| ------------- | ------------- | ----------------------------------------- |
| `trace_id` | 16 bytes | Unique identifier for the entire trace |
| `span_id` | 8 bytes | Current span (becomes parent on receiver) |
| `trace_flags` | 1 byte | Sampling decision flags |
| `trace_state` | 0-4 bytes | Optional vendor-specific data |
| **Total** | **~29 bytes** | **Added per traced P2P message** |
```mermaid
flowchart LR
subgraph msg["P2P Message with Trace Context"]
A["Original Message<br/>(variable size)"] --> B["+ TraceContext<br/>(~29 bytes)"]
end
subgraph breakdown["Context Breakdown"]
C["trace_id<br/>16 bytes"]
D["span_id<br/>8 bytes"]
E["flags<br/>1 byte"]
F["state<br/>0-4 bytes"]
end
B --> breakdown
style A fill:#424242,stroke:#212121,color:#fff
style B fill:#2e7d32,stroke:#1b5e20,color:#fff
style C fill:#1565c0,stroke:#0d47a1,color:#fff
style D fill:#1565c0,stroke:#0d47a1,color:#fff
style E fill:#e65100,stroke:#bf360c,color:#fff
style F fill:#4a148c,stroke:#2e0d57,color:#fff
```
**Reading the diagram:**
- **Original Message (gray, left)**: The existing P2P message payload of variable size this is unchanged; trace context is appended, never modifying the original data.
- **+ TraceContext (green, right of message)**: The additional 29-byte context block attached to each traced message; the arrow from the original message shows it is a pure addition.
- **Context Breakdown (right subgraph)**: The four fields `trace_id` (16 bytes), `span_id` (8 bytes), `flags` (1 byte), and `state` (0-4 bytes) show exactly what is added and their individual sizes.
- **Color coding**: Blue fields (`trace_id`, `span_id`) are the core identifiers required for trace correlation; orange (`flags`) controls sampling decisions; purple (`state`) is optional vendor data typically omitted.
> **Note**: 29 bytes represents ~1-6% overhead depending on message size (500B simple TX to 5KB proposal), which is acceptable for the observability benefits provided.
### Mitigation Strategies
```mermaid
flowchart LR
A["Head Sampling<br/>10% default"] --> B["Tail Sampling<br/>Keep errors/slow"] --> C["Batch Export<br/>Reduce I/O"] --> D["Conditional Compile<br/>XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY"]
style A fill:#1565c0,stroke:#0d47a1,color:#fff
style B fill:#2e7d32,stroke:#1b5e20,color:#fff
style C fill:#e65100,stroke:#bf360c,color:#fff
style D fill:#4a148c,stroke:#2e0d57,color:#fff
```
> For a detailed explanation of head vs. tail sampling, see Slide 9.
### Kill Switches (Rollback Options)
1. **Config Disable**: Set `enabled=0` in config instant disable, no restart needed for sampling
2. **Rebuild**: Compile with `XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY=OFF` zero overhead (no-op)
3. **Full Revert**: Clean separation allows easy commit reversion
---
## Slide 9: Sampling Strategies — Head vs. Tail
> Sampling controls **which traces are recorded and exported**. Without sampling, every operation generates a trace — at 500+ spans/sec, this overwhelms storage and network. Sampling lets you keep the signal, discard the noise.
### Head Sampling (Decision at Start)
The sampling decision is made **when a trace begins**, before any work is done. A random number is generated; if it falls within the configured ratio, the entire trace is recorded. Otherwise, the trace is silently dropped.
```mermaid
flowchart LR
A["New Request<br/>Arrives"] --> B{"Random < 10%?"}
B -->|"Yes (1 in 10)"| C["Record Entire Trace<br/>(all spans)"]
B -->|"No (9 in 10)"| D["Drop Entire Trace<br/>(zero overhead)"]
style C fill:#2e7d32,stroke:#1b5e20,color:#fff
style D fill:#c62828,stroke:#8c2809,color:#fff
style B fill:#1565c0,stroke:#0d47a1,color:#fff
```
| Aspect | Details |
| ----------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| **Where it runs** | Inside xrpld (SDK-level). Configured via `sampling_ratio` in `xrpld.cfg`. |
| **When the decision happens** | At trace creation time before the first span is even populated. |
| **How it works** | `sampling_ratio=0.1` means each trace has a 10% probability of being recorded. Dropped traces incur near-zero overhead (no spans created, no attributes set, no export). |
| **Propagation** | Once a trace is sampled, the `trace_flags` field (1 byte in the context header) tells downstream nodes to also sample it. Unsampled traces propagate `trace_flags=0`, so downstream nodes skip them too. |
| **Pros** | Lowest overhead. Simple to configure. Predictable resource usage. |
| **Cons** | **Blind** it doesn't know if the trace will be interesting. A rare error or slow consensus round has only a 10% chance of being captured. |
| **Best for** | High-volume, steady-state traffic where most traces look similar (e.g., routine RPC requests). |
**xrpld configuration**:
```ini
[telemetry]
# Record 10% of traces (recommended for production)
sampling_ratio=0.1
```
### Tail Sampling (Decision at End)
The sampling decision is made **after the trace completes**, based on its actual content was it slow? Did it error? Was it a consensus round? This requires buffering complete traces before deciding.
```mermaid
flowchart TB
A["All Traces<br/>Buffered (100%)"] --> B["OTel Collector<br/>Evaluates Rules"]
B --> C{"Error?"}
C -->|Yes| K["KEEP"]
C -->|No| D{"Slow?<br/>(>5s consensus,<br/>>1s RPC)"}
D -->|Yes| K
D -->|No| E{"Random < 10%?"}
E -->|Yes| K
E -->|No| F["DROP"]
style K fill:#2e7d32,stroke:#1b5e20,color:#fff
style F fill:#c62828,stroke:#8c2809,color:#fff
style B fill:#1565c0,stroke:#0d47a1,color:#fff
style C fill:#e65100,stroke:#bf360c,color:#fff
style D fill:#e65100,stroke:#bf360c,color:#fff
style E fill:#4a148c,stroke:#2e0d57,color:#fff
```
| Aspect | Details |
| ----------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| **Where it runs** | In the **OTel Collector** (external process), not inside xrpld. xrpld exports 100% of traces; the Collector decides what to keep. |
| **When the decision happens** | After the Collector has received all spans for a trace (waits `decision_wait=10s` for stragglers). |
| **How it works** | Policy rules evaluate the completed trace: keep all errors, keep slow operations above a threshold, keep all consensus rounds, then probabilistically sample the rest at 10%. |
| **Pros** | **Never misses important traces**. Errors, slow requests, and consensus anomalies are always captured regardless of probability. |
| **Cons** | Higher resource usage xrpld must export 100% of spans to the Collector, which buffers them in memory before deciding. The Collector needs more RAM (configured via `num_traces` and `decision_wait`). |
| **Best for** | Production troubleshooting where you can't afford to miss errors or anomalies. |
**Collector configuration** (tail sampling rules for xrpld):
```yaml
processors:
tail_sampling:
decision_wait: 10s # Wait for all spans in a trace
num_traces: 100000 # Buffer up to 100K concurrent traces
policies:
- name: errors # Always keep error traces
type: status_code
status_code: { status_codes: [ERROR] }
- name: slow-consensus # Keep consensus rounds >5s
type: latency
latency: { threshold_ms: 5000 }
- name: slow-rpc # Keep slow RPC requests >1s
type: latency
latency: { threshold_ms: 1000 }
- name: probabilistic # Sample 10% of everything else
type: probabilistic
probabilistic: { sampling_percentage: 10 }
```
### Head vs. Tail — Side-by-Side
| | Head Sampling | Tail Sampling |
| ----------------------------- | ---------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------ |
| **Decision point** | Trace start (inside xrpld) | Trace end (in OTel Collector) |
| **Knows trace content?** | No (random coin flip) | Yes (evaluates completed trace) |
| **Overhead on xrpld** | Lowest (dropped traces = no-op) | Higher (must export 100% to Collector) |
| **Collector resource usage** | Low (receives only sampled traces) | Higher (buffers all traces before deciding) |
| **Captures all errors?** | No (only if trace was randomly selected) | **Yes** (error policy catches them) |
| **Captures slow operations?** | No (random) | **Yes** (latency policy catches them) |
| **Configuration** | `xrpld.cfg`: `sampling_ratio=0.1` | `otel-collector.yaml`: `tail_sampling` processor |
| **Best for** | High-throughput steady-state | Troubleshooting & anomaly detection |
### Recommended Strategy for xrpld
Use **both** in a layered approach:
```mermaid
flowchart LR
subgraph xrpld["xrpld (Head Sampling)"]
HS["sampling_ratio=1.0<br/>(export everything)"]
end
subgraph collector["OTel Collector (Tail Sampling)"]
TS["Keep: errors + slow + 10% random<br/>Drop: routine traces"]
end
subgraph storage["Backend Storage"]
ST["Only interesting traces<br/>stored long-term"]
end
xrpld -->|"100% of spans"| collector -->|"~15-20% kept"| storage
style xrpld fill:#424242,stroke:#212121,color:#fff
style collector fill:#1565c0,stroke:#0d47a1,color:#fff
style storage fill:#2e7d32,stroke:#1b5e20,color:#fff
```
> **Why this works**: xrpld exports everything (no blind drops), the Collector applies intelligent filtering (keep errors/slow/anomalies, sample the rest), and only ~15-20% of traces reach storage. If Collector resource usage becomes a concern, add head sampling at `sampling_ratio=0.5` to halve the export volume while still giving the Collector enough data for good tail-sampling decisions.
---
## Slide 10: Data Collection & Privacy
### What Data is Collected
| Category | Attributes Collected | Purpose |
| --------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------- |
| **Transaction** | `tx_hash`, `tx_type`, `tx_result`, `tx_fee`, `ledger_index` | Trace transaction lifecycle |
| **Consensus** | `consensus_round`, `consensus_phase`, `consensus_mode`, `proposers` (count of proposing validators), `round_time_ms` | Analyze consensus timing |
| **RPC** | `command`, `version`, `rpc_status`, `duration_ms` | Monitor RPC performance |
| **Peer** | `peer_id`(public key), `peer_latency_ms`, `message_type`, `message_size_bytes` | Network topology analysis |
| **Ledger** | `ledger_hash`, `ledger_index`, `close_time`, `ledger_tx_count` | Ledger progression tracking |
| **Job** | `job_type`, `job_queue_ms`, `job_worker` | JobQueue performance |
### What is NOT Collected (Privacy Guarantees)
```mermaid
flowchart LR
subgraph notCollected["❌ NOT Collected"]
direction LR
A["Private Keys"] ~~~ B["Account Balances"] ~~~ C["Transaction Amounts"]
end
subgraph alsoNot["❌ Also Excluded"]
direction LR
D["IP Addresses<br/>(configurable)"] ~~~ E["Personal Data"] ~~~ F["Raw TX Payloads"]
end
style A fill:#c62828,stroke:#8c2809,color:#fff
style B fill:#c62828,stroke:#8c2809,color:#fff
style C fill:#c62828,stroke:#8c2809,color:#fff
style D fill:#c62828,stroke:#8c2809,color:#fff
style E fill:#c62828,stroke:#8c2809,color:#fff
style F fill:#c62828,stroke:#8c2809,color:#fff
```
**Reading the diagram:**
- **NOT Collected (top row, red)**: Private Keys, Account Balances, and Transaction Amounts are explicitly excluded these are financial/security-sensitive fields that telemetry never touches.
- **Also Excluded (bottom row, red)**: IP Addresses (configurable per deployment), Personal Data, and Raw TX Payloads are also excluded these protect operator and user privacy.
- **All-red styling**: Every box is styled in red to visually reinforce that these are hard exclusions, not optional the telemetry system has no code path to collect any of these fields.
- **Two-row layout**: The split between "NOT Collected" and "Also Excluded" distinguishes between financial data (top) and operational/personal data (bottom), making the privacy boundaries clear to auditors.
### Privacy Protection Mechanisms
| Mechanism | Description |
| -------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------- |
| **Account Hashing** | `tx_account` is hashed at collector level before storage |
| **Configurable Redaction** | Sensitive fields can be excluded via config |
| **Sampling** | Only 10% of traces recorded by default (reduces exposure) |
| **Local Control** | Node operators control what gets exported |
| **No Raw Payloads** | Transaction content is never recorded, only metadata |
> **Key Principle**: Telemetry collects **operational metadata** (timing, counts, hashes) — never **sensitive content** (keys, balances, amounts).
---
_End of Presentation_

View File

@@ -1621,64 +1621,3 @@ validators.txt
# set to ssl_verify to 0.
[ssl_verify]
1
#-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#
# 11. Telemetry (OpenTelemetry Tracing)
#
#-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#
# Enables distributed tracing via OpenTelemetry. Requires building with
# -DXRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY=ON (telemetry Conan option).
#
# [telemetry]
#
# enabled=0
#
# Enable or disable telemetry at runtime. Default: 0 (disabled).
#
# service_name=xrpld
#
# OTel resource attribute `service.name`. Default: xrpld.
# The node's network ID (from [network_id]) is automatically added
# as the `xrpl.network.id` and `xrpl.network.type` resource attributes.
#
# endpoint=http://localhost:4318/v1/traces
#
# The OTLP/HTTP exporter endpoint. The server sends trace data as
# protobuf-encoded HTTP POST requests to this URL.
# Default: http://localhost:4318/v1/traces.
#
# Head sampling is intentionally fixed at 1.0 (sample everything) and is
# not configurable. A per-node sampling ratio would let nodes make
# divergent keep/drop decisions for the same distributed trace, producing
# broken/partial traces. A ParentBasedSampler ensures spans inheriting a
# remote parent honor the upstream decision. Reduce volume at the collector
# via tail sampling instead; for node-local post-hoc dropping use
# SpanGuard::discard() in code.
#
# trace_rpc=1
#
# Enable tracing for JSON-RPC and WebSocket API request handling —
# command parsing, execution, and response serialization. Default: 1.
#
# trace_transactions=1
#
# Enable tracing for the transaction lifecycle — submission, validation,
# application to ledgers, and final disposition. Default: 1.
#
# trace_consensus=1
#
# Enable tracing for the consensus round lifecycle — proposals,
# validations, mode changes, and ledger acceptance. Default: 1.
#
# trace_peer=1
#
# Enable tracing for peer-to-peer protocol messages — overlay message
# send/receive, peer handshakes, and routing. High volume; enabled
# by default. Default: 1.
#
# trace_ledger=1
#
# Enable tracing for ledger close and accept operations — ledger
# building, state hashing, and write-back to the node store. Default: 1.
#

View File

@@ -201,23 +201,6 @@ target_link_libraries(
add_module(xrpl tx)
target_link_libraries(xrpl.libxrpl.tx PUBLIC xrpl.libxrpl.ledger)
# Telemetry module — OpenTelemetry distributed tracing support.
# Sources: include/xrpl/telemetry/ (headers), src/libxrpl/telemetry/ (impl).
# When telemetry=ON, links the Conan-provided umbrella target
# opentelemetry-cpp::opentelemetry-cpp (individual component targets like
# ::api, ::sdk are not available in the Conan package).
add_module(xrpl telemetry)
target_link_libraries(
xrpl.libxrpl.telemetry
PUBLIC xrpl.libxrpl.basics xrpl.libxrpl.beast xrpl.libxrpl.config
)
if(telemetry)
target_link_libraries(
xrpl.libxrpl.telemetry
PUBLIC opentelemetry-cpp::opentelemetry-cpp
)
endif()
add_library(xrpl.libxrpl)
set_target_properties(xrpl.libxrpl PROPERTIES OUTPUT_NAME xrpl)
@@ -250,7 +233,6 @@ target_link_modules(
resource
server
shamap
telemetry
tx
)

View File

@@ -1,24 +1,21 @@
{
"version": "0.5",
"requires": [
"zlib/1.3.2#1cb806da49011867778ffb6ac7190fcb%1778091116.056",
"zlib/1.3.2#1cb806da49011867778ffb6ac7190fcb%1777558780.503",
"xxhash/0.8.3#681d36a0a6111fc56e5e45ea182c19cc%1765850149.987",
"sqlite3/3.53.0#324ada52333108388a9a6108bfa96734%1778091117.311",
"sqlite3/3.53.0#324ada52333108388a9a6108bfa96734%1776096494.149",
"soci/4.0.3#fe32b9ad5eb47e79ab9e45a68f363945%1774450067.231",
"snappy/1.1.10#968fef506ff261592ec30c574d4a7809%1765850147.878",
"secp256k1/0.7.1#481881709eb0bdd0185a12b912bbe8ad%1770910500.329",
"rocksdb/10.5.1#4a197eca381a3e5ae8adf8cffa5aacd0%1765850186.86",
"re2/20251105#8579cfd0bda4daf0683f9e3898f964b4%1774398111.888",
"protobuf/6.33.5#d96d52ba5baaaa532f47bda866ad87a5%1774467363.12",
"opentelemetry-cpp/1.26.0#9d81768342c78cb897345fd419b358d2%1776934712.672",
"openssl/3.6.2#4789bbf131b77d0515d15e094c8f697f%1778071755.506",
"nudb/2.0.9#11149c73f8f2baff9a0198fe25971fc7%1775040983.408",
"nlohmann_json/3.11.3#45828be26eb619a2e04ca517bb7b828d%1701220705.259",
"lz4/1.10.0#59fc63cac7f10fbe8e05c7e62c2f3504%1765850143.914",
"libiconv/1.17#1e65319e945f2d31941a9d28cc13c058%1765842973.492",
"libcurl/8.20.0#465ac276192c197ddc6a9f4494004278%1779353234.048",
"libbacktrace/cci.20210118#a7691bfccd8caaf66309df196790a5a1%1765842973.03",
"libarchive/3.8.7#c446109bd1f1d8ba7936c94189bc50e6%1778091117.848",
"libarchive/3.8.7#c446109bd1f1d8ba7936c94189bc50e6%1776147552.838",
"jemalloc/5.3.1#1fc58d55316041f10fbc1e8a2eae632a%1776700028.228",
"gtest/1.17.0#5224b3b3ff3b4ce1133cbdd27d53ee7d%1768312129.152",
"grpc/1.78.1#b1a9e74b145cc471bed4dc64dc6eb2c1%1774467387.342",
@@ -26,22 +23,16 @@
"date/3.0.4#862e11e80030356b53c2c38599ceb32b%1765850143.772",
"c-ares/1.34.6#545240bb1c40e2cacd4362d6b8967650%1774439234.681",
"bzip2/1.0.8#c470882369c2d95c5c77e970c0c7e321%1765850143.837",
"boost/1.91.0#ea540ca2133d831b560036aa24dece3c%1778091165.282",
"boost/1.91.0#ea540ca2133d831b560036aa24dece3c%1778050991.9",
"abseil/20250127.0#bb0baf1f362bc4a725a24eddd419b8f7%1774365460.196"
],
"build_requires": [
"zlib/1.3.2#1cb806da49011867778ffb6ac7190fcb%1778091116.056",
"zlib/1.3.2#1cb806da49011867778ffb6ac7190fcb%1777558780.503",
"strawberryperl/5.32.1.1#8d114504d172cfea8ea1662d09b6333e%1774447376.964",
"protobuf/6.33.5#d96d52ba5baaaa532f47bda866ad87a5%1774467363.12",
"pkgconf/2.5.1#93c2051284cba1279494a43a4fcfeae2%1757684701.089",
"opentelemetry-proto/1.7.0#ed6d5bd761bef0afb0ba09676420b9ea%1749461220.268",
"ninja/1.13.2#c8c5dc2a52ed6e4e42a66d75b4717ceb%1764096931.974",
"nasm/2.16.01#31e26f2ee3c4346ecd347911bd126904%1765850144.707",
"msys2/cci.latest#d22fe7b2808f5fd34d0a7923ace9c54f%1770657326.649",
"meson/1.10.2#9d2d10681fe7fe61c788c58626c89b25%1775558003.754",
"m4/1.4.19#4523e4347b55cd26ae918bd5770cab9a%1778062762.471",
"libtool/2.4.7#14e7739cc128bc1623d2ed318008e47e%1755679003.847",
"gnu-config/cci.20210814#466e9d4d7779e1c142443f7ea44b4284%1762363589.329",
"cmake/4.3.0#b939a42e98f593fb34d3a8c5cc860359%1774439249.183",
"b2/5.4.2#ffd6084a119587e70f11cd45d1a386e2%1774439233.447",
"automake/1.16.5#b91b7c384c3deaa9d535be02da14d04f%1755524470.56",
@@ -67,9 +58,6 @@
],
"lz4/[>=1.9.4 <2]": [
"lz4/1.10.0#59fc63cac7f10fbe8e05c7e62c2f3504"
],
"protobuf/[>=4.25.3 <7]": [
"protobuf/6.33.5#d96d52ba5baaaa532f47bda866ad87a5"
]
},
"config_requires": []

View File

@@ -23,15 +23,3 @@ compiler.libcxx={{detect_api.detect_libcxx(compiler, version, compiler_exe)}}
{% if compiler == "gcc" and compiler_version < 13 %}
tools.build:cxxflags+=['-Wno-restrict']
{% endif %}
{% if os == "Windows" %}
# opentelemetry-cpp's recipe removes the `shared` option on Windows and never
# sets BUILD_SHARED_LIBS, so its upstream CMake defaults the protobuf-generated
# `opentelemetry_proto` target to a DLL (opentelemetry_proto.dll). The rest of
# the project links statically and nothing deploys that DLL next to the
# executables, so the telemetry unit test fails to start with
# STATUS_DLL_NOT_FOUND (0xC0000135). Force the dependency to build fully static
# so no runtime DLL is produced. The conf is folded into the package id so a
# fresh static binary is built instead of reusing a previously cached one.
opentelemetry-cpp/*:tools.cmake.cmaketoolchain:extra_variables={"BUILD_SHARED_LIBS": "OFF"}
opentelemetry-cpp/*:tools.info.package_id:confs+=["tools.cmake.cmaketoolchain:extra_variables"]
{% endif %}

View File

@@ -21,7 +21,6 @@ class Xrpl(ConanFile):
"rocksdb": [True, False],
"shared": [True, False],
"static": [True, False],
"telemetry": [True, False],
"tests": [True, False],
"unity": [True, False],
"xrpld": [True, False],
@@ -54,7 +53,6 @@ class Xrpl(ConanFile):
"rocksdb": True,
"shared": False,
"static": True,
"telemetry": True,
"tests": False,
"unity": False,
"xrpld": False,
@@ -141,10 +139,6 @@ class Xrpl(ConanFile):
self.requires("jemalloc/5.3.1")
if self.options.rocksdb:
self.requires("rocksdb/10.5.1")
# OpenTelemetry C++ SDK for distributed tracing (optional).
# Provides OTLP/HTTP exporter, batch span processor, and trace API.
if self.options.telemetry:
self.requires("opentelemetry-cpp/1.26.0")
self.requires("xxhash/0.8.3", transitive_headers=True)
exports_sources = (
@@ -173,7 +167,6 @@ class Xrpl(ConanFile):
tc.variables["rocksdb"] = self.options.rocksdb
tc.variables["BUILD_SHARED_LIBS"] = self.options.shared
tc.variables["static"] = self.options.static
tc.variables["telemetry"] = self.options.telemetry
tc.variables["unity"] = self.options.unity
tc.variables["xrpld"] = self.options.xrpld
tc.generate()
@@ -226,5 +219,3 @@ class Xrpl(ConanFile):
]
if self.options.rocksdb:
libxrpl.requires.append("rocksdb::librocksdb")
if self.options.telemetry:
libxrpl.requires.append("opentelemetry-cpp::opentelemetry-cpp")

View File

@@ -66,7 +66,6 @@ words:
- Btrfs
- Buildx
- canonicality
- CGNAT
- changespq
- checkme
- choco
@@ -119,8 +118,6 @@ words:
- fmtdur
- fsanitize
- funclets
- gantt
- Gantt
- gcov
- gcovr
- ghead
@@ -167,11 +164,12 @@ words:
- mathbunnyru
- mcmodel
- MEMORYSTATUSEX
- MPTAMM
- MPTDEX
- Merkle
- Metafuncton
- misprediction
- missingok
- MPTAMM
- mptbalance
- MPTDEX
- mptflags
@@ -205,7 +203,6 @@ words:
- nonxrp
- noreplace
- noripple
- nostd
- nostdinc
- notifempty
- nudb
@@ -214,7 +211,6 @@ words:
- Nyffenegger
- onlatest
- ostr
- otelc
- pargs
- partitioner
- paychan
@@ -222,7 +218,6 @@ words:
- permdex
- perminute
- permissioned
- pimpl
- pointee
- populator
- preauth
@@ -238,8 +233,10 @@ words:
- pyenv
- pyparsing
- qalloc
- qbsprofile
- queuable
- Raphson
- rcflags
- replayer
- rerere
- retriable
@@ -293,7 +290,6 @@ words:
- takerpays
- ters
- TMEndpointv2
- traceql
- trixie
- tx
- txid
@@ -301,7 +297,6 @@ words:
- txjson
- txn
- txns
- txqueue
- txs
- ubsan
- UBSAN
@@ -349,5 +344,4 @@ words:
- xrplf
- xxhash
- xxhasher
- xychart
- zpages
- CGNAT

View File

@@ -1,80 +0,0 @@
# Docker Compose stack for xrpld OpenTelemetry observability.
#
# Provides services for local development:
# - otel-collector: receives OTLP traces from xrpld, batches and
# forwards them to Tempo. Listens on ports 4317 (gRPC)
# and 4318 (HTTP).
# - tempo: Grafana Tempo tracing backend, queryable via Grafana Explore
# on port 3000. Recommended for production (S3/GCS storage, TraceQL).
# - grafana: dashboards on port 3000, pre-configured with Tempo
# datasource.
#
# Usage:
# docker compose -f docker/telemetry/docker-compose.yml up -d
#
# Configure xrpld to export traces by adding to xrpld.cfg:
# [telemetry]
# enabled=1
# endpoint=http://localhost:4318/v1/traces
services:
# OpenTelemetry Collector: receives spans from xrpld via OTLP protocol,
# batches them for efficiency, and forwards to Tempo for storage.
otel-collector:
image: otel/opentelemetry-collector-contrib:0.121.0
command: ["--config=/etc/otel-collector-config.yaml"]
ports:
- "4317:4317" # OTLP gRPC receiver
- "4318:4318" # OTLP HTTP receiver (xrpld sends traces here)
- "13133:13133" # Health check endpoint
volumes:
# Mount collector pipeline config (receivers → processors → exporters)
- ./otel-collector-config.yaml:/etc/otel-collector-config.yaml:ro
depends_on:
- tempo
networks:
- xrpld-telemetry
# Grafana Tempo: distributed tracing backend that stores and indexes
# spans. Queryable via TraceQL in Grafana Explore.
tempo:
image: grafana/tempo:2.7.2
command: ["-config.file=/etc/tempo.yaml"]
ports:
- "3200:3200" # Tempo HTTP API (health check, query)
volumes:
# Mount Tempo storage and ingestion config
- ./tempo.yaml:/etc/tempo.yaml:ro
# Persistent volume for trace data (WAL + blocks)
- tempo-data:/var/tempo
networks:
- xrpld-telemetry
# Grafana: visualization UI with Tempo pre-configured as a datasource.
# Anonymous admin access enabled for local development convenience.
grafana:
image: grafana/grafana:11.5.2
environment:
- GF_AUTH_ANONYMOUS_ENABLED=true # No login required for local dev
- GF_AUTH_ANONYMOUS_ORG_ROLE=Admin # Full access without auth
ports:
- "3000:3000" # Grafana web UI
volumes:
# Auto-provision Tempo datasource and search filters on startup
- ./grafana/provisioning:/etc/grafana/provisioning:ro
depends_on:
- tempo
networks:
- xrpld-telemetry
# Named volume for Tempo trace storage (WAL and compacted blocks).
# Data persists across container restarts. Remove with:
# docker compose -f docker/telemetry/docker-compose.yml down -v
volumes:
tempo-data:
# Isolated bridge network so services communicate by container name
# (e.g., the collector reaches Tempo at http://tempo:4317).
networks:
xrpld-telemetry:
driver: bridge

View File

@@ -1,91 +0,0 @@
# Grafana datasource provisioning for Grafana Tempo.
# Auto-configures Tempo as a trace data source on Grafana startup.
# Access Grafana at http://localhost:3000, then use Explore -> Tempo
# to browse xrpld traces using TraceQL.
#
# Search filters provide pre-configured dropdowns in the Explore UI.
# Each phase adds filters for the span attributes it introduces.
# Phase 1b (infra): Base filters — node identity, service, span name, status.
apiVersion: 1
datasources:
- name: Tempo
type: tempo
access: proxy
url: http://tempo:3200
uid: tempo
jsonData:
nodeGraph:
enabled: true
# Service map and traces-to-metrics require a Prometheus datasource
# (not included in this stack). These features are inactive until a
# Prometheus service is added to docker-compose.yml.
serviceMap:
datasourceUid: prometheus
tracesToMetrics:
datasourceUid: prometheus
spanStartTimeShift: "-1h"
spanEndTimeShift: "1h"
search:
filters:
# --- Node identification filters ---
# service.name: logical service name (default: "xrpld").
# Useful when running multiple service types in the same collector.
- id: service-name
tag: service.name
operator: "="
scope: resource
type: static
# service.instance.id: unique node identifier — defaults to the
# node's public key (e.g., nHB1X37...). Distinguishes individual
# nodes in a multi-node cluster or network.
- id: node-id
tag: service.instance.id
operator: "="
scope: resource
type: static
# service.version: xrpld build version (e.g., "2.4.0-b1").
# Filter traces from specific software releases.
- id: node-version
tag: service.version
operator: "="
scope: resource
type: dynamic
# xrpl.network.id: numeric network identifier
# (0 = mainnet, 1 = testnet, 2 = devnet, etc.).
# Derived from the [network_id] config section.
- id: network-id
tag: xrpl.network.id
operator: "="
scope: resource
type: dynamic
# xrpl.network.type: human-readable network name derived from
# network ID ("mainnet", "testnet", "devnet", "unknown").
- id: network-type
tag: xrpl.network.type
operator: "="
scope: resource
type: static
# --- Span intrinsic filters ---
# name: the span operation name (e.g., "rpc.command.server_info").
# Use to find traces for a specific RPC command or subsystem.
- id: span-name
tag: name
operator: "="
scope: intrinsic
type: static
# status: span completion status ("ok", "error", "unset").
# Filter for failed operations to diagnose errors.
- id: span-status
tag: status
operator: "="
scope: intrinsic
type: static
# duration: span wall-clock duration. Use with ">" operator
# to find slow operations (e.g., duration > 500ms).
- id: span-duration
tag: duration
operator: ">"
scope: intrinsic
type: static

View File

@@ -1,39 +0,0 @@
# OpenTelemetry Collector configuration for xrpld development.
#
# Pipeline: OTLP receiver -> batch processor -> debug + Tempo.
# xrpld sends traces via OTLP/HTTP to port 4318. The collector batches
# them and forwards to Tempo via OTLP/gRPC on the Docker network. Tempo
# is queryable via Grafana Explore using TraceQL.
receivers:
otlp:
protocols:
grpc:
endpoint: 0.0.0.0:4317
http:
endpoint: 0.0.0.0:4318
processors:
batch:
timeout: 1s
send_batch_size: 100
exporters:
debug:
verbosity: detailed
otlp/tempo:
endpoint: tempo:4317
tls:
insecure: true
extensions:
health_check:
endpoint: 0.0.0.0:13133
service:
extensions: [health_check]
pipelines:
traces:
receivers: [otlp]
processors: [batch]
exporters: [debug, otlp/tempo]

View File

@@ -1,61 +0,0 @@
# Grafana Tempo configuration for xrpld telemetry stack.
#
# Runs in single-binary mode for local development.
# Receives traces via OTLP/gRPC from the OTel Collector and stores
# them locally. Queryable via Grafana Explore using the Tempo datasource.
#
# Search filters are configured on the Grafana datasource side
# (grafana/provisioning/datasources/tempo.yaml). Tempo auto-indexes
# all span attributes for search in single-binary mode.
#
# For production, replace local storage with S3/GCS backend and adjust
# retention via the compactor settings. See:
# https://grafana.com/docs/tempo/latest/configuration/
stream_over_http_enabled: true
server:
http_listen_port: 3200
distributor:
receivers:
otlp:
protocols:
grpc:
endpoint: 0.0.0.0:4317
ingester:
max_block_duration: 5m
compactor:
compaction:
block_retention: 1h
# Enable metrics generator for service graph and span metrics.
# Produces RED metrics (rate, errors, duration) per service/span,
# feeding Grafana's service map visualization.
metrics_generator:
registry:
external_labels:
source: tempo
storage:
path: /var/tempo/generator/wal
# Uncomment and add a Prometheus service to docker-compose.yml
# to enable remote_write for service graph metrics:
# remote_write:
# - url: http://prometheus:9090/api/v1/write
overrides:
defaults:
metrics_generator:
processors:
- service-graphs
- span-metrics
storage:
trace:
backend: local
wal:
path: /var/tempo/wal
local:
path: /var/tempo/blocks

View File

@@ -1,129 +0,0 @@
# OpenTelemetry Tracing for xrpld
This document explains how to build xrpld with OpenTelemetry distributed tracing support, configure the runtime telemetry options, and set up the observability backend to view traces.
- [OpenTelemetry Tracing for xrpld](#opentelemetry-tracing-for-xrpld)
- [Overview](#overview)
- [Building with Telemetry](#building-with-telemetry)
- [Summary](#summary)
- [Build steps](#build-steps)
- [Install dependencies](#install-dependencies)
- [Call CMake](#call-cmake)
- [Build](#build)
- [Building without telemetry](#building-without-telemetry)
- [Troubleshooting](#troubleshooting)
- [Conan lockfile error](#conan-lockfile-error)
- [CMake target not found](#cmake-target-not-found)
- [Conditional compilation](#conditional-compilation)
## Overview
xrpld supports optional [OpenTelemetry](https://opentelemetry.io/) distributed tracing.
When enabled, it instruments RPC requests with trace spans that are exported via
OTLP/HTTP to an OpenTelemetry Collector, which forwards them to a tracing backend
such as Grafana Tempo.
Telemetry is **off by default** at both compile time and runtime:
- **Compile time**: The Conan option `telemetry` and CMake option `telemetry` must be set to `True`/`ON`.
When disabled, all `SpanGuard` calls compile to inline no-ops (defined in `SpanGuard.h`)
with zero overhead — no OTel SDK dependency required.
- **Runtime**: The `[telemetry]` config section must set `enabled=1`.
When disabled at runtime, a no-op implementation is used.
## Building with Telemetry
### Summary
Follow the same instructions as mentioned in [BUILD.md](../../BUILD.md) but with the following changes:
1. Pass `-o telemetry=True` to `conan install` to pull the `opentelemetry-cpp` dependency.
2. CMake will automatically pick up `telemetry=ON` from the Conan-generated toolchain.
3. Build as usual.
---
### Build steps
```bash
cd /path/to/xrpld
rm -rf .build
mkdir .build
cd .build
```
#### Install dependencies
The `telemetry` option adds `opentelemetry-cpp/1.26.0` as a dependency.
If the Conan lockfile does not yet include this package, bypass it with `--lockfile=""`.
```bash
conan install .. \
--output-folder . \
--build missing \
--settings build_type=Debug \
-o telemetry=True \
-o tests=True \
-o xrpld=True \
--lockfile=""
```
> **Note**: The first build with telemetry may take longer as `opentelemetry-cpp`
> and its transitive dependencies are compiled from source.
#### Call CMake
The Conan-generated toolchain file sets `telemetry=ON` automatically.
No additional CMake flags are needed beyond the standard ones.
```bash
cmake .. -G Ninja \
-DCMAKE_TOOLCHAIN_FILE:FILEPATH=build/generators/conan_toolchain.cmake \
-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug \
-Dtests=ON -Dxrpld=ON
```
You should see in the CMake output:
```
-- OpenTelemetry tracing enabled
```
#### Build
```bash
cmake --build . --parallel $(nproc)
```
## Building without telemetry
Omit the `-o telemetry=True` option (or pass `-o telemetry=False`).
The `opentelemetry-cpp` dependency will not be downloaded,
the `XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY` preprocessor define will not be set,
and all tracing macros will compile to no-ops.
The resulting binary is identical to one built before telemetry support was added.
## Troubleshooting
### Conan lockfile error
If you see `ERROR: Requirement 'opentelemetry-cpp/1.26.0' not in lockfile 'requires'`,
the lockfile was generated without the telemetry dependency.
Pass `--lockfile=""` to bypass the lockfile, or regenerate it with telemetry enabled.
### CMake target not found
If CMake reports that `opentelemetry-cpp` targets are not found,
ensure you ran `conan install` with `-o telemetry=True` and that the
Conan-generated toolchain file is being used.
The Conan package provides a single umbrella target
`opentelemetry-cpp::opentelemetry-cpp` (not individual component targets).
## Conditional compilation
All OpenTelemetry SDK types are hidden behind the pimpl idiom in `SpanGuard.cpp`.
When `XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY` is not defined, `SpanGuard.h` provides an all-inline
no-op stub class with zero overhead and zero OTel dependencies.
At runtime, if `enabled=0` is set in config (or the section is omitted), a
`NullTelemetry` implementation is used that returns no-op spans.
This two-layer approach ensures zero overhead when telemetry is not wanted.

View File

@@ -18,9 +18,6 @@ class Manager;
namespace perf {
class PerfLog;
} // namespace perf
namespace telemetry {
class Telemetry;
} // namespace telemetry
// This is temporary until we migrate all code to use ServiceRegistry.
class Application;
@@ -221,9 +218,6 @@ public:
virtual perf::PerfLog&
getPerfLog() = 0;
virtual telemetry::Telemetry&
getTelemetry() = 0;
// Configuration and state
[[nodiscard]] virtual bool
isStopping() const = 0;

View File

@@ -1,25 +0,0 @@
#pragma once
/** Thread-local flag for span discard signaling.
SpanGuard::discard() sets gTlDiscardCurrentSpan to true before calling
Span::End(). The OTel SDK calls SpanProcessor::OnEnd() synchronously on
the same thread, so FilteringSpanProcessor checks and clears this flag
in OnEnd() to drop the span before it enters the batch export queue.
This side-channel avoids inspecting the Recordable's internals (which
vary by exporter type — SpanData vs OtlpRecordable).
Kept in a separate header to avoid transitive include bloat: SpanGuard.h
only needs this flag, not the full Telemetry.h with BasicConfig/Journal.
@see SpanGuard::discard(), FilteringSpanProcessor (Telemetry.cpp)
*/
namespace xrpl::telemetry {
/** When true, the FilteringSpanProcessor drops the current span in
OnEnd(). Set by SpanGuard::discard(), cleared by OnEnd(). */
inline thread_local bool gTlDiscardCurrentSpan = false;
} // namespace xrpl::telemetry

View File

@@ -1,419 +0,0 @@
#pragma once
/** RAII guard for OpenTelemetry trace spans.
Wraps an OTel Span and Scope behind the pimpl idiom so that no
opentelemetry headers are exposed in this public header. When
XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY is not defined, SpanGuard is an empty class
with all-inline no-op methods — zero overhead, zero dependencies.
Dependency diagram:
+-------------------------------------------+
| SpanGuard |
+-------------------------------------------+
| - impl_ : unique_ptr<Impl> (pimpl) |
+-------------------------------------------+
| + span(cat, prefix, name) [static] |
| + childSpan(name) : SpanGuard |
| + linkedSpan(name) : SpanGuard |
| + captureContext() : SpanContext |
| + setAttribute(key, value) |
| + setOk() / setError(desc) |
| + addEvent(name) |
| + recordException(e) |
| + discard() |
| + operator bool() |
+-------------------------------------------+
| hides (pimpl)
+-------+-------+
| |
+--------+ +-------------+
| Span | | Scope |
| (OTel) | | (OTel, non- |
| | | movable) |
+--------+ +-------------+
Static factory methods access the global Telemetry instance
internally (via Telemetry::getInstance()), check whether tracing
is enabled for the requested subsystem, and return either an
active guard or a null (no-op) guard. Callers never need a
Telemetry reference.
Usage examples:
Span names and attribute keys come from per-module `*SpanNames.h`
headers (e.g. RpcSpanNames.h, TxSpanNames.h) as typed compile-time
constants — never raw string literals — so the naming spec is
enforced at the call site and dashboards stay in sync.
1. Basic RPC tracing (factory method with category):
@code
#include <xrpld/rpc/detail/RpcSpanNames.h>
using namespace xrpl::telemetry;
auto span = SpanGuard::span(
TraceCategory::Rpc, rpc_span::prefix::command, "submit");
span.setAttribute(rpc_span::attr::command, "submit");
span.setAttribute(rpc_span::attr::rpcStatus, rpc_span::val::success);
// span ended automatically on scope exit
@endcode
2. Error recording:
@code
auto span = SpanGuard::span(
TraceCategory::Rpc, rpc_span::prefix::command, "submit");
try {
doWork();
span.setOk();
} catch (std::exception const& e) {
span.recordException(e);
}
@endcode
3. Cross-thread context propagation:
@code
#include <xrpld/consensus/ConsensusSpanNames.h>
using namespace xrpl::telemetry;
// Thread A: create span and capture context
auto span = SpanGuard::span(
TraceCategory::Consensus, seg::consensus, consensus::span::op::round);
auto ctx = span.captureContext();
// Thread B: create child with captured context
auto child = SpanGuard::childSpan(consensus::span::accept, ctx);
@endcode
4. Conditional check (rarely needed — methods are no-ops on null):
@code
auto span = SpanGuard::span(
TraceCategory::Rpc, rpc_span::prefix::rpc, rpc_span::op::httpRequest);
if (span) {
// expensive attribute computation only when active
span.setAttribute(rpc_span::attr::requestPayloadSize, computeSize());
}
@endcode
5. Tail-based filtering via discard():
@code
auto span = SpanGuard::span(
TraceCategory::Transactions, tx_span::prefix::tx, tx_span::op::process);
auto result = preflight(tx);
if (result != tesSUCCESS) {
span.discard(); // drop span, never exported
return result;
}
@endcode
@note Thread safety: A SpanGuard must only be used on the thread
where it was constructed (the internal Scope binds to the
thread-local context stack). Use captureContext() to propagate
the trace to other threads.
@note Move semantics: Move construction transfers ownership of
the pimpl pointer — no double-Scope issues. Move assignment is
deleted to prevent re-scoping mid-flight.
@note Known limitations:
- Attributes cannot be removed per the OTel spec; use
setAttribute with an empty value as a convention.
- SpanGuard::span() (raw Span access) is intentionally not
exposed — all interaction goes through the public methods.
*/
#include <cstdint>
#include <exception>
#include <memory>
#include <string_view>
namespace xrpl::telemetry {
/** Trace subsystem categories for conditional span creation.
Each value maps to a runtime config flag (e.g. `trace_rpc=1`).
Used by SpanGuard::span(TraceCategory, prefix, name) to decide
whether to create a real span or return a null guard.
*/
enum class TraceCategory { Rpc, Transactions, Consensus, Peer, Ledger };
/** Opaque wrapper for an OTel context snapshot.
Used to propagate trace context across threads. Created by
SpanGuard::captureContext(), consumed by SpanGuard::childSpan()
or SpanGuard::linkedSpan() with an explicit parent/link context.
*/
class SpanContext
{
friend class SpanGuard;
#ifdef XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY
struct Impl;
std::shared_ptr<Impl> impl_;
explicit SpanContext(std::shared_ptr<Impl> impl);
#endif
public:
SpanContext() = default;
/** @return true if this context holds a valid trace context. */
#ifdef XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY
[[nodiscard]] bool
isValid() const;
#else
// NOLINTBEGIN(readability-convert-member-functions-to-static)
[[nodiscard]] bool
isValid() const
{
return false;
}
// NOLINTEND(readability-convert-member-functions-to-static)
#endif
};
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
// Real implementation (pimpl, compiled in SpanGuard.cpp)
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
#ifdef XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY
/** RAII wrapper that activates a span on construction and ends it on
destruction. All OTel types are hidden behind the Impl pointer.
Non-copyable, move-constructible.
*/
class SpanGuard
{
struct Impl;
std::unique_ptr<Impl> impl_;
explicit SpanGuard(std::unique_ptr<Impl> impl);
public:
/** Construct a null (no-op) guard. All methods are safe to call. */
SpanGuard();
~SpanGuard();
SpanGuard(SpanGuard&& other) noexcept;
SpanGuard&
operator=(SpanGuard&&) = delete;
SpanGuard(SpanGuard const&) = delete;
SpanGuard&
operator=(SpanGuard const&) = delete;
// --- Static factory methods ----------------------------------------
/** Create a span guarded by a TraceCategory flag.
The span name is built as "prefix.name". Returns a null guard
if the category is disabled in config.
@param cat Trace subsystem category.
@param prefix Span name prefix (e.g. "rpc.command").
@param name Span name suffix (e.g. "submit").
*/
[[nodiscard]] static SpanGuard
span(TraceCategory cat, std::string_view prefix, std::string_view name);
// --- Child / linked span creation ----------------------------------
/** Create a child span parented to this guard's active context.
@param name Span name for the child.
@return A new guard, or null if this guard is inactive.
*/
[[nodiscard]] SpanGuard
childSpan(std::string_view name) const;
/** Create a child span parented to an explicit captured context.
@param name Span name for the child.
@param parentCtx Context captured via captureContext().
@return A new guard, or null if parentCtx is invalid.
*/
[[nodiscard]] static SpanGuard
childSpan(std::string_view name, SpanContext const& parentCtx);
/** Create a span linked (follows-from) to this guard's span.
The new span is NOT a child — it starts a new sub-tree but
carries a causal link to this span.
@param name Span name for the linked span.
@return A new guard, or null if this guard is inactive.
*/
[[nodiscard]] SpanGuard
linkedSpan(std::string_view name) const;
/** Create a span linked to an explicit captured context.
@param name Span name for the linked span.
@param linkCtx Context to link from.
@return A new guard, or null if linkCtx is invalid.
*/
[[nodiscard]] static SpanGuard
linkedSpan(std::string_view name, SpanContext const& linkCtx);
// --- Context capture -----------------------------------------------
/** Snapshot the current thread's OTel context for cross-thread use.
@return An opaque SpanContext, or an invalid one if null guard.
*/
[[nodiscard]] SpanContext
captureContext() const;
// --- Attribute setters (explicit overloads, no OTel types) ---------
/** Set a string attribute. No-op on a null guard. */
void
setAttribute(std::string_view key, std::string_view value);
/** Set a string attribute (C-string overload). No-op on a null guard. */
void
setAttribute(std::string_view key, char const* value);
/** Set an integer attribute. No-op on a null guard. */
void
setAttribute(std::string_view key, std::int64_t value);
/** Set a floating-point attribute. No-op on a null guard. */
void
setAttribute(std::string_view key, double value);
/** Set a boolean attribute. No-op on a null guard. */
void
setAttribute(std::string_view key, bool value);
// --- Status / events -----------------------------------------------
/** Mark the span status as OK. No-op on a null guard. */
void
setOk();
/** Mark the span status as error. No-op on a null guard.
@param description Optional human-readable error description.
*/
void
setError(std::string_view description = "");
/** Add a named event to the span's timeline. No-op on a null guard.
@param name Event name.
*/
void
addEvent(std::string_view name);
/** Record an exception as a span event following OTel semantic
conventions, and mark the span status as error.
No-op on a null guard.
@param e The exception to record.
*/
void
recordException(std::exception const& e);
/** Mark this span for discard and end it immediately.
The FilteringSpanProcessor drops the span before it enters the
batch export queue. After discard(), the guard is inert.
*/
void
discard();
/** @return true if this guard holds an active span. */
explicit
operator bool() const;
};
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
// No-op stub (all inline, zero overhead, no OTel dependency)
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
#else // XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY not defined
class SpanGuard
{
public:
SpanGuard() = default;
~SpanGuard() = default;
SpanGuard(SpanGuard&&) noexcept = default;
SpanGuard&
operator=(SpanGuard&&) = delete;
SpanGuard(SpanGuard const&) = delete;
SpanGuard&
operator=(SpanGuard const&) = delete;
[[nodiscard]] static SpanGuard
span(TraceCategory, std::string_view, std::string_view)
{
return {};
}
// NOLINTBEGIN(readability-convert-member-functions-to-static)
[[nodiscard]] SpanGuard
childSpan(std::string_view) const
{
return {};
}
[[nodiscard]] static SpanGuard
childSpan(std::string_view, SpanContext const&)
{
return {};
}
[[nodiscard]] SpanGuard
linkedSpan(std::string_view) const
{
return {};
}
[[nodiscard]] static SpanGuard
linkedSpan(std::string_view, SpanContext const&)
{
return {};
}
[[nodiscard]] SpanContext
captureContext() const
{
return {};
}
// NOLINTEND(readability-convert-member-functions-to-static)
void
setAttribute(std::string_view, std::string_view)
{
}
void
setAttribute(std::string_view, char const*)
{
}
void
setAttribute(std::string_view, std::int64_t)
{
}
void
setAttribute(std::string_view, double)
{
}
void
setAttribute(std::string_view, bool)
{
}
void
setOk()
{
}
void
setError(std::string_view = "")
{
}
void
addEvent(std::string_view)
{
}
void
recordException(std::exception const&)
{
}
void
discard()
{
}
explicit
operator bool() const
{
return false;
}
};
#endif // XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY
} // namespace xrpl::telemetry

View File

@@ -1,324 +0,0 @@
#pragma once
/** Abstract interface for OpenTelemetry distributed tracing.
Provides the Telemetry base class that all components use to create trace
spans. Two concrete implementations exist, selected at construction time
by makeTelemetry():
- TelemetryImpl (Telemetry.cpp): real OTel SDK integration, compiled
only when XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY is defined and enabled at runtime.
- NullTelemetry (NullTelemetry.cpp): no-op stub used when telemetry is
disabled at compile time or runtime.
Inheritance / dependency diagram:
+--------------------+
| Telemetry | (abstract, this file)
| <<interface>> |
+---------+----------+
|
+---------+-----------+-------------------+
| | |
+---+------------+ +-----+---------+ +------+----------+
| TelemetryImpl | | NullTelemetry | | NullTelemetryOtel|
| (Telemetry.cpp)| |(NullTelemetry | | (Telemetry.cpp) |
| OTel SDK | | .cpp) | | noop w/ OTel API |
+----------------+ +---------------+ +------------------+
The Setup struct holds all configuration parsed from the [telemetry]
section of xrpld.cfg. See TelemetryConfig.cpp for the parser and
cfg/xrpld-example.cfg for the available options.
OTel SDK headers are conditionally included behind XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY
so that builds without telemetry have zero dependency on opentelemetry-cpp.
Usage examples:
1. Root span at a subsystem entry point (typical usage):
@code
// In an RPC handler dispatch:
auto guard = SpanGuard::span(TraceCategory::Rpc, "rpc", commandName);
guard.setAttribute("command", commandName);
// ... process request
// guard destructor automatically ends the span on scope exit
@endcode
2. Child span for a sub-operation (cross-scope):
@code
auto parent = SpanGuard::span(TraceCategory::Transactions, "tx", "process");
{
auto child = parent.childSpan("tx.apply");
child.setAttribute("tx_type", txType);
// child ends here
}
// parent continues, then ends here
@endcode
3. Cross-thread context propagation:
@code
// Thread A: capture the active context while span is in scope
auto ctx = parentGuard.captureContext();
// Thread B: create child span with explicit parent
auto child = SpanGuard::childSpan("async.work", ctx);
@endcode
@note Thread safety: The Telemetry interface is safe for concurrent reads
(isEnabled, shouldTrace*, getTracer, startSpan) after start() completes.
setServiceInstanceId() must be called before start() and is not thread-safe.
The OTel SDK's TracerProvider and Tracer are internally thread-safe.
*/
#include <xrpl/beast/utility/Journal.h>
#include <xrpl/config/BasicConfig.h>
#include <atomic>
#include <chrono>
#include <memory>
#include <string>
#include <string_view>
#ifdef XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY
#include <opentelemetry/context/context.h>
#include <opentelemetry/nostd/shared_ptr.h>
#include <opentelemetry/trace/span.h>
#include <opentelemetry/trace/tracer.h>
#endif
namespace xrpl::telemetry {
class Telemetry
{
/** Global singleton pointer, set by start()/stop() in the active
implementation. Allows SpanGuard factory methods to access the
Telemetry instance without callers passing it explicitly.
Atomic with acquire/release ordering: start()/stop() store on
the initialization thread, factory methods load on worker threads.
@see setInstance(), getInstance()
*/
inline static std::atomic<Telemetry*> instance{nullptr};
public:
/** Get the global Telemetry instance.
@return Pointer to the active instance, or nullptr if not started.
*/
static Telemetry*
getInstance()
{
return instance.load(std::memory_order_acquire);
}
/** Set the global Telemetry instance.
Called by start()/stop() in concrete implementations.
Tests can call this with a mock to override the global instance.
@param t Pointer to the Telemetry instance, or nullptr to clear.
*/
static void
setInstance(Telemetry* t)
{
instance.store(t, std::memory_order_release);
}
/** Configuration parsed from the [telemetry] section of xrpld.cfg.
All fields have sensible defaults so the section can be minimal
or omitted entirely. See TelemetryConfig.cpp for the parser.
*/
struct Setup
{
/** Master switch: true to enable tracing at runtime. */
bool enabled = false;
/** OTel resource attribute `service.name`. */
std::string serviceName = "xrpld";
/** OTel resource attribute `service.version` (set from BuildInfo). */
std::string serviceVersion;
/** OTel resource attribute `service.instance.id` (defaults to node
public key). */
std::string serviceInstanceId;
/** OTLP/HTTP endpoint URL where spans are sent. */
std::string exporterEndpoint = "http://localhost:4318/v1/traces";
/** Whether to use TLS for the exporter connection. */
bool useTls = false;
/** Path to a CA certificate bundle for TLS verification. */
std::string tlsCertPath;
/** Head-based sampling ratio. Intentionally fixed at 1.0 (sample
everything) and NOT read from config. A per-node ratio would let
nodes make divergent keep/drop decisions for the same distributed
trace, producing broken/partial traces. The ratio sampler is wrapped
in a ParentBasedSampler (see Telemetry.cpp) so spans inheriting a
remote parent honor the upstream sampled flag. Volume reduction is
delegated to the collector's tail sampling; for node-local post-hoc
dropping see SpanGuard::discard().
*/
double const samplingRatio = 1.0;
/** Maximum number of spans per batch export. */
std::uint32_t batchSize = 512;
/** Delay between batch exports. */
std::chrono::milliseconds batchDelay{5000};
/** Maximum number of spans queued before dropping. */
std::uint32_t maxQueueSize = 2048;
/** Network identifier, added as an OTel resource attribute. */
std::uint32_t networkId = 0;
/** Network type label (e.g. "mainnet", "testnet", "devnet"). */
std::string networkType = "mainnet";
/** Enable tracing for transaction processing. */
bool traceTransactions = true;
/** Enable tracing for consensus rounds. */
bool traceConsensus = true;
/** Enable tracing for RPC request handling. */
bool traceRpc = true;
/** Enable tracing for peer-to-peer messages (enabled by default;
high volume). */
bool tracePeer = true;
/** Enable tracing for ledger close/accept. */
bool traceLedger = true;
};
virtual ~Telemetry() = default;
/** Update the service instance ID (OTel resource attribute
`service.instance.id`).
Must be called before start(). The node public key is not available
when Telemetry is constructed (during the ApplicationImp member
initializer list), so this setter allows Application::setup() to
inject the identity once nodeIdentity_ is known.
@param id The node's base58-encoded public key or custom identifier.
*/
virtual void
setServiceInstanceId(std::string const& id)
{
// Default no-op for NullTelemetry implementations.
(void)id;
}
/** Initialize the tracing pipeline (exporter, processor, provider).
Call after construction.
*/
virtual void
start() = 0;
/** Flush pending spans and shut down the tracing pipeline.
Call before destruction.
*/
virtual void
stop() = 0;
/** @return true if this instance is actively exporting spans. */
[[nodiscard]] virtual bool
isEnabled() const = 0;
/** @return true if transaction processing should be traced. */
[[nodiscard]] virtual bool
shouldTraceTransactions() const = 0;
/** @return true if consensus rounds should be traced. */
[[nodiscard]] virtual bool
shouldTraceConsensus() const = 0;
/** @return true if RPC request handling should be traced. */
[[nodiscard]] virtual bool
shouldTraceRpc() const = 0;
/** @return true if peer-to-peer messages should be traced. */
[[nodiscard]] virtual bool
shouldTracePeer() const = 0;
/** @return true if ledger close/accept should be traced. */
[[nodiscard]] virtual bool
shouldTraceLedger() const = 0;
#ifdef XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY
/** Get or create a named tracer instance.
@param name Tracer name used to identify the instrumentation library.
@return A shared pointer to the Tracer.
*/
virtual opentelemetry::nostd::shared_ptr<opentelemetry::trace::Tracer>
getTracer(std::string_view name = "xrpld") = 0;
/** Start a new span on the current thread's context.
The span becomes a child of the current active span (if any) via
OpenTelemetry's context propagation.
@param name Span name (typically "rpc.command.<cmd>").
@param kind The span kind (defaults to kInternal). Possible values:
- kInternal: default, in-process operation
- kServer: incoming synchronous request (e.g. RPC)
- kClient: outgoing synchronous request
- kProducer: async message send (e.g. peer broadcast)
- kConsumer: async message receive
@return A shared pointer to the new Span.
*/
virtual opentelemetry::nostd::shared_ptr<opentelemetry::trace::Span>
startSpan(
std::string_view name,
opentelemetry::trace::SpanKind kind = opentelemetry::trace::SpanKind::kInternal) = 0;
/** Start a new span with an explicit parent context.
Use this overload when the parent span is not on the current
thread's context stack (e.g. cross-thread trace propagation).
@param name Span name.
@param parentContext The parent span's context.
@param kind The span kind (defaults to kInternal).
@return A shared pointer to the new Span.
*/
virtual opentelemetry::nostd::shared_ptr<opentelemetry::trace::Span>
startSpan(
std::string_view name,
opentelemetry::context::Context const& parentContext,
opentelemetry::trace::SpanKind kind = opentelemetry::trace::SpanKind::kInternal) = 0;
#endif
};
/** Create a Telemetry instance.
Returns a TelemetryImpl when setup.enabled is true, or a
NullTelemetry no-op stub otherwise.
@param setup Configuration from the [telemetry] config section.
@param journal Journal for log output during initialization.
*/
std::unique_ptr<Telemetry>
makeTelemetry(Telemetry::Setup const& setup, beast::Journal journal);
/** Parse the [telemetry] config section into a Setup struct.
@param section The [telemetry] config section.
@param nodePublicKey Node public key, used as default instance ID.
@param version Build version string.
@param networkId Network identifier from [network_id] config
(0 = mainnet, 1 = testnet, 2 = devnet).
@return A populated Setup struct with defaults for missing values.
*/
Telemetry::Setup
setupTelemetry(
Section const& section,
std::string const& nodePublicKey,
std::string const& version,
std::uint32_t networkId);
} // namespace xrpl::telemetry

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,26 @@
{ pkgs, ... }:
let
inherit (import ./packages.nix { inherit pkgs; }) commonPackages;
# conan is in the binary cache for Linux but not for Darwin, so on Darwin
# it is always built from source — and its bundled test suite is unreliable
# in the sandbox: `test_qbsprofile_rcflags` needs gcc (absent on Darwin, see
# https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/528995) and the patch tests are
# flaky from source. We only use conan as a build tool, so skip its tests on
# Darwin. Scoped to the dev shell (not the CI env, which builds conan on
# Linux from the cache). Drop once the fix reaches nixos-unstable and the
# lock is bumped.
pkgs_patched =
if pkgs.stdenv.isDarwin then
pkgs.extend (
final: prev: {
conan = prev.conan.overridePythonAttrs (_: {
doCheck = false;
});
}
)
else
pkgs;
inherit (import ./packages.nix { pkgs = pkgs_patched; }) commonPackages;
# Supported compiler versions
gccVersion = pkgs.lib.range 13 15;

View File

@@ -1,137 +0,0 @@
/** No-op implementation of the Telemetry interface.
Always compiled (regardless of XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY). Provides the
makeTelemetry() factory when telemetry is compiled out (#ifndef), which
unconditionally returns a NullTelemetry that does nothing.
When XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY IS defined, the OTel virtual methods
(getTracer, startSpan) return noop tracers/spans. The makeTelemetry()
factory in this file is not used in that case -- Telemetry.cpp provides
its own factory that can return the real TelemetryImpl.
*/
#include <xrpl/telemetry/Telemetry.h>
#include <memory>
#include <utility>
#ifdef XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY
#include <opentelemetry/context/context.h>
#include <opentelemetry/nostd/shared_ptr.h>
#include <opentelemetry/trace/noop.h>
#include <opentelemetry/trace/span.h>
#include <opentelemetry/trace/span_metadata.h>
#include <opentelemetry/trace/tracer.h>
#include <string_view>
#endif
namespace xrpl::telemetry {
namespace {
/** No-op Telemetry that returns immediately from every method.
Used as the sole implementation when XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY is not
defined, or as a fallback when it is defined but enabled=0.
*/
class NullTelemetry : public Telemetry
{
/** Retained configuration (unused, kept for diagnostic access). */
Setup const setup_;
public:
explicit NullTelemetry(Setup setup) : setup_(std::move(setup))
{
}
void
start() override
{
Telemetry::setInstance(this);
}
void
stop() override
{
Telemetry::setInstance(nullptr);
}
[[nodiscard]] bool
isEnabled() const override
{
return false;
}
[[nodiscard]] bool
shouldTraceTransactions() const override
{
return false;
}
[[nodiscard]] bool
shouldTraceConsensus() const override
{
return false;
}
[[nodiscard]] bool
shouldTraceRpc() const override
{
return false;
}
[[nodiscard]] bool
shouldTracePeer() const override
{
return false;
}
[[nodiscard]] bool
shouldTraceLedger() const override
{
return false;
}
#ifdef XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY
opentelemetry::nostd::shared_ptr<opentelemetry::trace::Tracer>
getTracer(std::string_view) override
{
static auto noopTracer = opentelemetry::nostd::shared_ptr<opentelemetry::trace::Tracer>(
new opentelemetry::trace::NoopTracer());
return noopTracer;
}
opentelemetry::nostd::shared_ptr<opentelemetry::trace::Span>
startSpan(std::string_view, opentelemetry::trace::SpanKind) override
{
return opentelemetry::nostd::shared_ptr<opentelemetry::trace::Span>(
new opentelemetry::trace::NoopSpan(nullptr));
}
opentelemetry::nostd::shared_ptr<opentelemetry::trace::Span>
startSpan(
std::string_view,
opentelemetry::context::Context const&,
opentelemetry::trace::SpanKind) override
{
return opentelemetry::nostd::shared_ptr<opentelemetry::trace::Span>(
new opentelemetry::trace::NoopSpan(nullptr));
}
#endif
};
} // namespace
/** Factory used when XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY is not defined.
Unconditionally returns a NullTelemetry instance.
*/
#ifndef XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY
std::unique_ptr<Telemetry>
makeTelemetry(Telemetry::Setup const& setup, beast::Journal)
{
return std::make_unique<NullTelemetry>(setup);
}
#endif
} // namespace xrpl::telemetry

View File

@@ -1,362 +0,0 @@
/** Pimpl implementation for SpanGuard and SpanContext.
All OpenTelemetry SDK types are confined to this translation unit.
The public SpanGuard.h header contains only standard-library types
and forward-declares the Impl struct.
Static factory methods access the global Telemetry instance via
Telemetry::getInstance(), check whether the requested TraceCategory
is enabled, and return either an active guard with a real Span+Scope
or a null guard whose methods are all no-ops.
The Impl struct holds the OTel Span (shared_ptr) and Scope.
Scope is non-movable, but since Impl lives behind a unique_ptr,
SpanGuard's move constructor simply transfers the pointer — no
double-Scope issues.
@see SpanGuard (SpanGuard.h), Telemetry (Telemetry.h),
FilteringSpanProcessor (Telemetry.cpp)
*/
#ifdef XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY
#include <xrpl/telemetry/SpanGuard.h>
#include <xrpl/telemetry/DiscardFlag.h>
#include <xrpl/telemetry/Telemetry.h>
#include <opentelemetry/context/context.h>
#include <opentelemetry/context/runtime_context.h>
#include <opentelemetry/nostd/shared_ptr.h>
#include <opentelemetry/trace/context.h>
#include <opentelemetry/trace/scope.h>
#include <opentelemetry/trace/span.h>
#include <opentelemetry/trace/span_metadata.h>
#include <opentelemetry/trace/span_startoptions.h>
#include <cstdint>
#include <exception>
#include <memory>
#include <string>
#include <string_view>
#include <typeinfo>
#include <utility>
namespace xrpl::telemetry {
namespace otel_trace = opentelemetry::trace;
// ===== SpanContext::Impl ===================================================
struct SpanContext::Impl
{
opentelemetry::context::Context ctx;
explicit Impl(opentelemetry::context::Context c) : ctx(std::move(c))
{
}
};
SpanContext::SpanContext(std::shared_ptr<Impl> impl) : impl_(std::move(impl))
{
}
bool
SpanContext::isValid() const
{
return impl_ != nullptr;
}
// ===== SpanGuard::Impl ====================================================
struct SpanGuard::Impl
{
/** The OTel span being guarded. Set to nullptr after discard(). */
opentelemetry::nostd::shared_ptr<otel_trace::Span> span;
/** Scope that activates span on the current thread's context stack. */
otel_trace::Scope scope;
explicit Impl(opentelemetry::nostd::shared_ptr<otel_trace::Span> s)
: span(std::move(s)), scope(span)
{
}
~Impl()
{
if (span)
span->End();
}
Impl(Impl const&) = delete;
Impl&
operator=(Impl const&) = delete;
Impl(Impl&&) = delete;
Impl&
operator=(Impl&&) = delete;
};
// ===== SpanGuard core lifecycle ============================================
SpanGuard::SpanGuard() = default;
SpanGuard::~SpanGuard() = default;
SpanGuard::SpanGuard(SpanGuard&&) noexcept = default;
SpanGuard::SpanGuard(std::unique_ptr<Impl> impl) : impl_(std::move(impl))
{
}
SpanGuard::
operator bool() const
{
return impl_ != nullptr;
}
// ===== Static factory methods ==============================================
/** Check whether the given TraceCategory is enabled on the Telemetry instance.
@return true if the category's shouldTrace*() flag is on.
*/
static bool
isCategoryEnabled(Telemetry const& tel, TraceCategory cat)
{
switch (cat)
{
case TraceCategory::Rpc:
return tel.shouldTraceRpc();
case TraceCategory::Transactions:
return tel.shouldTraceTransactions();
case TraceCategory::Consensus:
return tel.shouldTraceConsensus();
case TraceCategory::Peer:
return tel.shouldTracePeer();
case TraceCategory::Ledger:
return tel.shouldTraceLedger();
}
return false; // unreachable, silences compiler warning
}
namespace {
// Map a TraceCategory to an OTel SpanKind so Tempo's service-graph /
// RED metrics see the correct direction. RPC spans are emitted at the
// server entry point (handler dispatch), Peer spans at inbound-message
// receipt. Transactions / Consensus / Ledger are internal processing
// and keep the default kInternal.
otel_trace::SpanKind
categoryToSpanKind(TraceCategory cat)
{
switch (cat)
{
case TraceCategory::Rpc:
return otel_trace::SpanKind::kServer;
case TraceCategory::Peer:
return otel_trace::SpanKind::kConsumer;
case TraceCategory::Transactions:
case TraceCategory::Consensus:
case TraceCategory::Ledger:
return otel_trace::SpanKind::kInternal;
}
return otel_trace::SpanKind::kInternal; // unreachable
}
} // namespace
SpanGuard
SpanGuard::span(TraceCategory cat, std::string_view prefix, std::string_view name)
{
auto* tel = Telemetry::getInstance();
if ((tel == nullptr) || !tel->isEnabled() || !isCategoryEnabled(*tel, cat))
return {};
auto fullName = std::string(prefix) + "." + std::string(name);
return SpanGuard(std::make_unique<Impl>(tel->startSpan(fullName, categoryToSpanKind(cat))));
}
// ===== Child / linked span creation ========================================
SpanGuard
SpanGuard::childSpan(std::string_view name) const
{
if (!impl_)
return {};
auto* tel = Telemetry::getInstance();
if ((tel == nullptr) || !tel->isEnabled())
return {};
auto ctx = opentelemetry::context::RuntimeContext::GetCurrent();
return SpanGuard(std::make_unique<Impl>(tel->startSpan(name, ctx)));
}
SpanGuard
SpanGuard::childSpan(std::string_view name, SpanContext const& parentCtx)
{
if (!parentCtx.isValid())
return {};
auto* tel = Telemetry::getInstance();
if ((tel == nullptr) || !tel->isEnabled())
return {};
return SpanGuard(std::make_unique<Impl>(tel->startSpan(name, parentCtx.impl_->ctx)));
}
SpanGuard
SpanGuard::linkedSpan(std::string_view name) const
{
if (!impl_)
return {};
auto* tel = Telemetry::getInstance();
if ((tel == nullptr) || !tel->isEnabled())
return {};
auto tracer = tel->getTracer("xrpld");
auto spanCtx = impl_->span->GetContext();
// Mark as root span so it starts a new trace sub-tree rather than
// inheriting the current thread's active span as parent.
otel_trace::StartSpanOptions opts;
opentelemetry::context::Context rootCtx;
rootCtx = rootCtx.SetValue(otel_trace::kIsRootSpanKey, true);
opts.parent = rootCtx;
return SpanGuard(
std::make_unique<Impl>(tracer->StartSpan(
std::string(name), {}, {{spanCtx, {{"xrpl.link.type", "follows_from"}}}}, opts)));
}
SpanGuard
SpanGuard::linkedSpan(std::string_view name, SpanContext const& linkCtx)
{
if (!linkCtx.isValid())
return {};
auto* tel = Telemetry::getInstance();
if ((tel == nullptr) || !tel->isEnabled())
return {};
auto tracer = tel->getTracer("xrpld");
// Extract the span from the captured context to get its SpanContext.
auto linkSpan = otel_trace::GetSpan(linkCtx.impl_->ctx);
if (!linkSpan || !linkSpan->GetContext().IsValid())
return {};
// Mark as root span so it starts a new trace sub-tree rather than
// inheriting the current thread's active span as parent.
otel_trace::StartSpanOptions opts;
opentelemetry::context::Context rootCtx;
rootCtx = rootCtx.SetValue(otel_trace::kIsRootSpanKey, true);
opts.parent = rootCtx;
return SpanGuard(
std::make_unique<Impl>(tracer->StartSpan(
std::string(name),
{},
{{linkSpan->GetContext(), {{"xrpl.link.type", "follows_from"}}}},
opts)));
}
// ===== Context capture =====================================================
SpanContext
SpanGuard::captureContext() const
{
if (!impl_)
return {};
auto ctx = opentelemetry::context::RuntimeContext::GetCurrent();
return SpanContext(std::make_shared<SpanContext::Impl>(ctx));
}
// ===== Attribute setters ===================================================
void
SpanGuard::setAttribute(std::string_view key, std::string_view value)
{
if (impl_)
{
impl_->span->SetAttribute(
opentelemetry::nostd::string_view(key.data(), key.size()),
opentelemetry::nostd::string_view(value.data(), value.size()));
}
}
void
SpanGuard::setAttribute(std::string_view key, char const* value)
{
setAttribute(key, std::string_view(value));
}
void
SpanGuard::setAttribute(std::string_view key, std::int64_t value)
{
if (impl_)
impl_->span->SetAttribute(opentelemetry::nostd::string_view(key.data(), key.size()), value);
}
void
SpanGuard::setAttribute(std::string_view key, double value)
{
if (impl_)
impl_->span->SetAttribute(opentelemetry::nostd::string_view(key.data(), key.size()), value);
}
void
SpanGuard::setAttribute(std::string_view key, bool value)
{
if (impl_)
impl_->span->SetAttribute(opentelemetry::nostd::string_view(key.data(), key.size()), value);
}
// ===== Status / events =====================================================
void
SpanGuard::setOk()
{
if (impl_)
impl_->span->SetStatus(otel_trace::StatusCode::kOk);
}
void
SpanGuard::setError(std::string_view description)
{
if (impl_)
impl_->span->SetStatus(otel_trace::StatusCode::kError, std::string(description));
}
void
SpanGuard::addEvent(std::string_view name)
{
if (impl_)
impl_->span->AddEvent(std::string(name));
}
void
SpanGuard::recordException(std::exception const& e)
{
if (!impl_)
return;
impl_->span->AddEvent(
"exception",
{{"exception.type", typeid(e).name()}, {"exception.message", std::string(e.what())}});
impl_->span->SetStatus(otel_trace::StatusCode::kError, e.what());
}
void
SpanGuard::discard()
{
if (impl_)
{
gTlDiscardCurrentSpan = true;
impl_->span->End();
// Clear here so discard() owns the flag's whole lifetime
// (set -> End -> clear) in one scope, rather than relying on
// FilteringSpanProcessor::OnEnd() to clear it. Today every valid guard
// wraps a recording span (head sampling is 1.0), so OnEnd() always runs
// and clearing here is equivalent — but colocating set and clear keeps
// the flag leak-proof if a later phase can hand back a non-recording
// span (e.g. honoring a non-sampled remote parent during propagation).
gTlDiscardCurrentSpan = false;
impl_->span = nullptr; // prevent ~Impl from calling End() again
impl_.reset();
}
}
} // namespace xrpl::telemetry
#endif // XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY

View File

@@ -1,434 +0,0 @@
/** OpenTelemetry SDK implementation of the Telemetry interface.
Compiled only when XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY is defined (via CMake
telemetry=ON). Contains:
- FilteringSpanProcessor: decorator that drops spans marked with
kDiscardedAttr before they enter the batch export queue.
- TelemetryImpl: configures the OTel SDK with an OTLP/HTTP exporter,
FilteringSpanProcessor wrapping a batch span processor,
trace-ID-ratio sampler, and resource attributes.
- NullTelemetryOtel: no-op fallback used when telemetry is compiled in
but disabled at runtime (enabled=0 in config).
- makeTelemetry(): factory that selects the appropriate implementation.
*/
#ifdef XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY
#include <xrpl/telemetry/Telemetry.h>
#include <xrpl/basics/Log.h>
#include <xrpl/beast/utility/Journal.h>
#include <xrpl/telemetry/DiscardFlag.h>
#include <opentelemetry/context/context.h>
#include <opentelemetry/exporters/otlp/otlp_http_exporter_factory.h>
#include <opentelemetry/exporters/otlp/otlp_http_exporter_options.h>
#include <opentelemetry/nostd/shared_ptr.h>
#include <opentelemetry/sdk/resource/resource.h>
#include <opentelemetry/sdk/trace/batch_span_processor_factory.h>
#include <opentelemetry/sdk/trace/batch_span_processor_options.h>
#include <opentelemetry/sdk/trace/processor.h>
#include <opentelemetry/sdk/trace/sampler.h>
#include <opentelemetry/sdk/trace/samplers/parent_factory.h>
#include <opentelemetry/sdk/trace/samplers/trace_id_ratio.h>
#include <opentelemetry/sdk/trace/tracer_provider.h>
#include <opentelemetry/sdk/trace/tracer_provider_factory.h>
#include <opentelemetry/semconv/incubating/service_attributes.h>
#include <opentelemetry/trace/noop.h>
#include <opentelemetry/trace/provider.h>
#include <opentelemetry/trace/span.h>
#include <opentelemetry/trace/span_metadata.h>
#include <opentelemetry/trace/span_startoptions.h>
#include <opentelemetry/trace/tracer.h>
#include <opentelemetry/trace/tracer_provider.h>
#include <chrono>
#include <cstdint>
#include <memory>
#include <string>
#include <string_view>
#include <utility>
namespace xrpl::telemetry {
namespace {
namespace trace_api = opentelemetry::trace;
namespace trace_sdk = opentelemetry::sdk::trace;
namespace otlp_http = opentelemetry::exporter::otlp;
namespace resource = opentelemetry::sdk::resource;
/** SpanProcessor decorator that drops discarded spans.
Wraps a delegate processor (typically BatchSpanProcessor). In OnEnd(),
checks the gTlDiscardCurrentSpan thread-local flag. If set (by
SpanGuard::discard()), the span is silently dropped — never entering
the batch queue, never sent over the network, never stored.
Uses a thread-local flag rather than inspecting Recordable attributes
because the Recordable type varies by exporter (SpanData for simple
exporters, OtlpRecordable for OTLP) and none expose a uniform getter.
The flag is safe because Span::End() calls OnEnd() synchronously on
the same thread.
All other methods delegate directly to the wrapped processor.
Dependency diagram:
+---------------------------+
| FilteringSpanProcessor |
+---------------------------+
| - delegate_ : unique_ptr |
| <SpanProcessor> |
+---------------------------+
| wraps
+---------+-----------+
| BatchSpanProcessor |
+---------------------+
@note Thread safety: OnEnd() may be called concurrently from multiple
threads. The gTlDiscardCurrentSpan flag is thread-local, so each
thread's discard state is independent — no synchronization needed.
*/
class FilteringSpanProcessor : public trace_sdk::SpanProcessor
{
std::unique_ptr<trace_sdk::SpanProcessor> delegate_;
public:
explicit FilteringSpanProcessor(std::unique_ptr<trace_sdk::SpanProcessor> delegate)
: delegate_(std::move(delegate))
{
}
std::unique_ptr<trace_sdk::Recordable>
MakeRecordable() noexcept override
{
return delegate_->MakeRecordable();
}
void
OnStart(
trace_sdk::Recordable& span,
opentelemetry::trace::SpanContext const& parentContext) noexcept override
{
delegate_->OnStart(span, parentContext);
}
void
OnEnd(std::unique_ptr<trace_sdk::Recordable>&& span) noexcept override
{
if (gTlDiscardCurrentSpan)
{
// SpanGuard::discard() set the flag on this thread just before
// calling Span::End(), which invokes OnEnd() synchronously.
// Drop the span.
return;
}
delegate_->OnEnd(std::move(span));
}
bool
ForceFlush(
std::chrono::microseconds timeout = (std::chrono::microseconds::max)()) noexcept override
{
return delegate_->ForceFlush(timeout);
}
bool
Shutdown(
std::chrono::microseconds timeout = (std::chrono::microseconds::max)()) noexcept override
{
return delegate_->Shutdown(timeout);
}
};
/** No-op implementation used when XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY is defined but
setup.enabled is false at runtime.
Lives in the anonymous namespace so there is no ODR conflict with the
NullTelemetry in NullTelemetry.cpp.
*/
class NullTelemetryOtel : public Telemetry
{
/** Retained configuration (unused, kept for diagnostic access). */
Setup const setup_;
public:
explicit NullTelemetryOtel(Setup setup) : setup_(std::move(setup))
{
}
void
start() override
{
Telemetry::setInstance(this);
}
void
stop() override
{
Telemetry::setInstance(nullptr);
}
[[nodiscard]] bool
isEnabled() const override
{
return false;
}
[[nodiscard]] bool
shouldTraceTransactions() const override
{
return false;
}
[[nodiscard]] bool
shouldTraceConsensus() const override
{
return false;
}
[[nodiscard]] bool
shouldTraceRpc() const override
{
return false;
}
[[nodiscard]] bool
shouldTracePeer() const override
{
return false;
}
[[nodiscard]] bool
shouldTraceLedger() const override
{
return false;
}
opentelemetry::nostd::shared_ptr<trace_api::Tracer>
getTracer(std::string_view) override
{
static auto noopTracer =
opentelemetry::nostd::shared_ptr<trace_api::Tracer>(new trace_api::NoopTracer());
return noopTracer;
}
opentelemetry::nostd::shared_ptr<trace_api::Span>
startSpan(std::string_view, trace_api::SpanKind) override
{
return opentelemetry::nostd::shared_ptr<trace_api::Span>(new trace_api::NoopSpan(nullptr));
}
opentelemetry::nostd::shared_ptr<trace_api::Span>
startSpan(std::string_view, opentelemetry::context::Context const&, trace_api::SpanKind)
override
{
return opentelemetry::nostd::shared_ptr<trace_api::Span>(new trace_api::NoopSpan(nullptr));
}
};
/** Full OTel SDK implementation that exports trace spans via OTLP/HTTP.
Configures an OTLP/HTTP exporter, batch span processor,
TraceIdRatioBasedSampler, and resource attributes on start().
*/
class TelemetryImpl : public Telemetry
{
/** Configuration from the [telemetry] config section.
Non-const so setServiceInstanceId() can update the instance ID
before start() creates the OTel resource.
*/
Setup setup_;
/** Journal used for log output during start/stop. */
beast::Journal const journal_;
/** The SDK TracerProvider that owns the export pipeline.
Held as std::shared_ptr so we can call ForceFlush() on shutdown.
Wrapped in a nostd::shared_ptr when registered as the global provider.
*/
std::shared_ptr<trace_sdk::TracerProvider> sdkProvider_;
public:
TelemetryImpl(Setup setup, beast::Journal journal) : setup_(std::move(setup)), journal_(journal)
{
}
void
setServiceInstanceId(std::string const& id) override
{
setup_.serviceInstanceId = id;
}
void
start() override
{
JLOG(journal_.info()) << "Telemetry starting: endpoint=" << setup_.exporterEndpoint
<< " sampling=" << setup_.samplingRatio;
// Configure OTLP HTTP exporter
otlp_http::OtlpHttpExporterOptions exporterOpts;
exporterOpts.url = setup_.exporterEndpoint;
if (setup_.useTls)
exporterOpts.ssl_ca_cert_path = setup_.tlsCertPath;
auto exporter = otlp_http::OtlpHttpExporterFactory::Create(exporterOpts);
// Configure batch processor
trace_sdk::BatchSpanProcessorOptions processorOpts;
processorOpts.max_queue_size = setup_.maxQueueSize;
processorOpts.schedule_delay_millis = std::chrono::milliseconds(setup_.batchDelay);
processorOpts.max_export_batch_size = setup_.batchSize;
auto batchProcessor =
trace_sdk::BatchSpanProcessorFactory::Create(std::move(exporter), processorOpts);
// Wrap batch processor with filtering processor that drops spans
// marked with kDiscardedAttr (via SpanGuard::discard()).
auto processor = std::make_unique<FilteringSpanProcessor>(std::move(batchProcessor));
// Configure resource attributes
auto resourceAttrs = resource::Resource::Create({
{opentelemetry::semconv::service::kServiceName, setup_.serviceName},
{opentelemetry::semconv::service::kServiceVersion, setup_.serviceVersion},
{opentelemetry::semconv::service::kServiceInstanceId, setup_.serviceInstanceId},
{"xrpl.network.id", static_cast<int64_t>(setup_.networkId)},
{"xrpl.network.type", setup_.networkType},
});
// Configure sampler. Head sampling is fixed at 1.0 (sample everything);
// setup_.samplingRatio is not config-driven. Wrap the ratio sampler in a
// ParentBasedSampler so spans with a remote parent honor the upstream
// sampled flag — this keeps keep/drop decisions coherent for a single
// distributed trace spanning multiple nodes. Volume reduction is left to
// the collector's tail sampling.
auto rootSampler =
std::make_shared<trace_sdk::TraceIdRatioBasedSampler>(setup_.samplingRatio);
auto sampler = trace_sdk::ParentBasedSamplerFactory::Create(std::move(rootSampler));
// Create TracerProvider
sdkProvider_ = trace_sdk::TracerProviderFactory::Create(
std::move(processor), resourceAttrs, std::move(sampler));
// Set as global provider
trace_api::Provider::SetTracerProvider(
opentelemetry::nostd::shared_ptr<trace_api::TracerProvider>(sdkProvider_));
// Register as the global Telemetry instance so SpanGuard factory
// methods can access it without callers passing a reference.
Telemetry::setInstance(this);
JLOG(journal_.info()) << "Telemetry started successfully";
}
void
stop() override
{
JLOG(journal_.info()) << "Telemetry stopping";
// Unregister global instance before tearing down the pipeline.
Telemetry::setInstance(nullptr);
if (sdkProvider_)
{
// Force flush with timeout to avoid blocking indefinitely
// when the OTLP endpoint is unreachable.
sdkProvider_->ForceFlush(std::chrono::milliseconds(5000));
// TODO: sdkProvider_ is not thread-safe. This reset() races with
// getTracer() if any thread is still calling startSpan().
// Currently safe because Application::stop() shuts down
// serverHandler_, overlay_, and jobQueue_ before calling
// telemetry_->stop() — so no callers should remain. If the
// shutdown order ever changes, add an std::atomic<bool> stopped_
// flag checked in getTracer() to make this robust.
sdkProvider_.reset();
trace_api::Provider::SetTracerProvider(
opentelemetry::nostd::shared_ptr<trace_api::TracerProvider>(
new trace_api::NoopTracerProvider()));
}
JLOG(journal_.info()) << "Telemetry stopped";
}
[[nodiscard]] bool
isEnabled() const override
{
return true;
}
[[nodiscard]] bool
shouldTraceTransactions() const override
{
return setup_.traceTransactions;
}
[[nodiscard]] bool
shouldTraceConsensus() const override
{
return setup_.traceConsensus;
}
[[nodiscard]] bool
shouldTraceRpc() const override
{
return setup_.traceRpc;
}
[[nodiscard]] bool
shouldTracePeer() const override
{
return setup_.tracePeer;
}
[[nodiscard]] bool
shouldTraceLedger() const override
{
return setup_.traceLedger;
}
opentelemetry::nostd::shared_ptr<trace_api::Tracer>
getTracer(std::string_view name) override
{
if (!sdkProvider_)
return trace_api::Provider::GetTracerProvider()->GetTracer(std::string(name));
return sdkProvider_->GetTracer(std::string(name));
}
opentelemetry::nostd::shared_ptr<trace_api::Span>
startSpan(std::string_view name, trace_api::SpanKind kind) override
{
auto tracer = getTracer("xrpld");
trace_api::StartSpanOptions opts;
opts.kind = kind;
return tracer->StartSpan(std::string(name), opts);
}
opentelemetry::nostd::shared_ptr<trace_api::Span>
startSpan(
std::string_view name,
opentelemetry::context::Context const& parentContext,
trace_api::SpanKind kind) override
{
auto tracer = getTracer("xrpld");
trace_api::StartSpanOptions opts;
opts.kind = kind;
opts.parent = parentContext;
return tracer->StartSpan(std::string(name), opts);
}
};
} // namespace
std::unique_ptr<Telemetry>
makeTelemetry(Telemetry::Setup const& setup, beast::Journal journal)
{
if (setup.enabled)
return std::make_unique<TelemetryImpl>(setup, journal);
return std::make_unique<NullTelemetryOtel>(setup);
}
} // namespace xrpl::telemetry
#endif // XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY

View File

@@ -1,124 +0,0 @@
/** Parser for the [telemetry] section of xrpld.cfg.
Reads configuration values from the config file and populates a
Telemetry::Setup struct. All options have sensible defaults so the
section can be minimal or omitted entirely.
See cfg/xrpld-example.cfg for the full list of available options.
*/
#include <xrpl/config/BasicConfig.h>
#include <xrpl/telemetry/Telemetry.h>
#include <chrono>
#include <cstdint>
#include <string>
namespace xrpl::telemetry {
namespace {
/** Config key names for the [telemetry] section.
Each must match the corresponding option documented in
cfg/xrpld-example.cfg verbatim. Defined as `char const*` so they
pass to Section::valueOr() (which takes `std::string const&`)
without an explicit conversion, exactly as a literal would.
*/
namespace key {
constexpr char const* enabled = "enabled";
constexpr char const* serviceName = "service_name";
constexpr char const* serviceInstanceId = "service_instance_id";
constexpr char const* endpoint = "endpoint";
constexpr char const* useTls = "use_tls";
constexpr char const* tlsCaCert = "tls_ca_cert";
constexpr char const* batchSize = "batch_size";
constexpr char const* batchDelayMs = "batch_delay_ms";
constexpr char const* maxQueueSize = "max_queue_size";
constexpr char const* traceTransactions = "trace_transactions";
constexpr char const* traceConsensus = "trace_consensus";
constexpr char const* traceRpc = "trace_rpc";
constexpr char const* tracePeer = "trace_peer";
constexpr char const* traceLedger = "trace_ledger";
} // namespace key
/** Default values applied when a key is absent from the config.
@note serviceName mirrors SystemParameters' systemName() ("xrpld") but
is duplicated here as a literal: the telemetry module deliberately does
not link xrpl.libxrpl.protocol, so including SystemParameters.h would
introduce an undeclared cross-module dependency.
*/
namespace dflt {
constexpr char const* serviceName = "xrpld";
constexpr char const* endpoint = "http://localhost:4318/v1/traces";
constexpr std::uint32_t batchSize = 512u;
constexpr std::uint32_t batchDelayMs = 5000u;
constexpr std::uint32_t maxQueueSize = 2048u;
} // namespace dflt
/** Derive a human-readable network type label from the numeric network ID.
@param networkId The network identifier from [network_id] config.
@return "mainnet", "testnet", "devnet", or "unknown" for other values.
*/
std::string
networkTypeFromId(std::uint32_t networkId)
{
switch (networkId)
{
case 0:
return "mainnet";
case 1:
return "testnet";
case 2:
return "devnet";
default:
return "unknown";
}
}
} // namespace
Telemetry::Setup
setupTelemetry(
Section const& section,
std::string const& nodePublicKey,
std::string const& version,
std::uint32_t networkId)
{
Telemetry::Setup setup;
setup.enabled = section.valueOr<int>(key::enabled, 0) != 0;
setup.serviceName = section.valueOr<std::string>(key::serviceName, dflt::serviceName);
setup.serviceVersion = version;
setup.serviceInstanceId = section.valueOr<std::string>(key::serviceInstanceId, nodePublicKey);
setup.exporterEndpoint = section.valueOr<std::string>(key::endpoint, dflt::endpoint);
setup.useTls = section.valueOr<int>(key::useTls, 0) != 0;
setup.tlsCertPath = section.valueOr<std::string>(key::tlsCaCert, "");
// Head sampling is intentionally fixed at 1.0 (sample everything) and is
// not read from config. A per-node ratio would let nodes make divergent
// keep/drop decisions for the same distributed trace, producing broken
// traces; volume reduction is delegated to the collector's tail sampling.
// setup.samplingRatio is a const member fixed at 1.0; nothing to parse.
setup.batchSize = section.valueOr<std::uint32_t>(key::batchSize, dflt::batchSize);
setup.batchDelay = std::chrono::milliseconds{
section.valueOr<std::uint32_t>(key::batchDelayMs, dflt::batchDelayMs)};
setup.maxQueueSize = section.valueOr<std::uint32_t>(key::maxQueueSize, dflt::maxQueueSize);
setup.networkId = networkId;
setup.networkType = networkTypeFromId(networkId);
setup.traceTransactions = section.valueOr<int>(key::traceTransactions, 1) != 0;
setup.traceConsensus = section.valueOr<int>(key::traceConsensus, 1) != 0;
setup.traceRpc = section.valueOr<int>(key::traceRpc, 1) != 0;
setup.tracePeer = section.valueOr<int>(key::tracePeer, 1) != 0;
setup.traceLedger = section.valueOr<int>(key::traceLedger, 1) != 0;
return setup;
}
} // namespace xrpl::telemetry

View File

@@ -3,12 +3,21 @@
#include <test/jtx/Oracle.h>
#include <test/jtx/amount.h>
#include <xrpld/app/ledger/OpenLedger.h>
#include <xrpl/basics/Number.h>
#include <xrpl/basics/base_uint.h>
#include <xrpl/beast/unit_test/suite.h>
#include <xrpl/beast/utility/Journal.h>
#include <xrpl/core/ServiceRegistry.h>
#include <xrpl/ledger/OpenView.h>
#include <xrpl/protocol/Feature.h>
#include <xrpl/protocol/Indexes.h>
#include <xrpl/protocol/SField.h>
#include <xrpl/protocol/jss.h>
#include <cstdlib>
#include <memory>
#include <optional>
#include <string>
#include <vector>
@@ -312,11 +321,91 @@ public:
}
}
void
testNullTxReadMeta()
{
testcase("Null txRead metadata");
using namespace jtx;
// Verify that iteratePriceData handles a null txRead result
// gracefully (returns early) rather than crashing with a
// nullptr dereference. This simulates local data corruption
// where a transaction referenced by sfPreviousTxnID is missing
// from the ledger's transaction map.
Env env(*this);
auto const baseFee = static_cast<int>(env.current()->fees().base.drops());
Account const owner{"owner"};
env.fund(XRP(1'000), owner);
// Create oracle with XRP/USD and XRP/EUR
Oracle oracle(
env,
{.owner = owner,
.series = {{"XRP", "USD", 740, 1}, {"XRP", "EUR", 840, 1}},
.fee = baseFee});
// Update oracle to only have XRP/EUR, pushing XRP/USD into
// history. iteratePriceData will need to read historical tx
// metadata to find the XRP/USD price.
oracle.set(UpdateArg{.series = {{"XRP", "EUR", 850, 1}}, .fee = baseFee});
OraclesData const oracles{{owner, oracle.documentID()}};
// Precondition: with an uncorrupted oracle, the historical
// traversal must succeed and produce a price for XRP/USD.
// This proves the test reaches iteratePriceData's history
// path; without it, a future change that breaks the setup
// could turn the post-corruption assertion into a vacuous
// pass (objectNotFound is reachable from many unrelated
// code paths).
{
auto const ret = Oracle::aggregatePrice(env, "XRP", "USD", oracles);
BEAST_EXPECT(!ret.isMember(jss::error));
BEAST_EXPECT(ret.isMember(jss::median));
}
// Simulate data corruption: modify the oracle SLE in the open
// ledger to have a bogus sfPreviousTxnID that doesn't exist in
// any ledger. sfPreviousTxnLgrSeq still points to a valid closed
// ledger, so getLedgerBySeq succeeds but txRead returns null.
auto const oracleKeylet = keylet::oracle(owner, oracle.documentID());
uint256 const bogusTxnID{0xABCABCAB};
bool const modified = env.app().getOpenLedger().modify(
[&oracleKeylet, &bogusTxnID](OpenView& view, beast::Journal) -> bool {
auto const sle = view.read(oracleKeylet);
if (!sle)
return false;
auto replacement = std::make_shared<SLE>(*sle, sle->key());
replacement->setFieldH256(sfPreviousTxnID, bogusTxnID);
view.rawReplace(replacement);
return true;
});
// Confirm the injection actually took effect: modify must
// report success, and re-reading the SLE must show the
// bogus hash. Otherwise the failure-mode assertion below
// would not be exercising the null-txRead path at all.
BEAST_EXPECT(modified);
if (auto const sle = env.current()->read(oracleKeylet); BEAST_EXPECT(sle))
BEAST_EXPECT(sle->getFieldH256(sfPreviousTxnID) == bogusTxnID);
// Query for XRP/USD using the "current" (open) ledger.
// The oracle SLE now has a bogus sfPreviousTxnID. The current
// oracle only has EUR, so iteratePriceData will try to read
// history. txRead returns null for the bogus hash, and the
// null check should cause a graceful early return instead of
// a nullptr dereference.
auto const ret = Oracle::aggregatePrice(env, "XRP", "USD", oracles);
BEAST_EXPECT(ret[jss::error].asString() == "objectNotFound");
}
void
run() override
{
testErrors();
testRpc();
testNullTxReadMeta();
}
};

View File

@@ -7,7 +7,6 @@
#include <xrpl/core/ServiceRegistry.h>
#include <xrpl/ledger/PendingSaves.h>
#include <xrpl/server/LoadFeeTrack.h>
#include <xrpl/telemetry/Telemetry.h>
#include <boost/asio/io_context.hpp>
@@ -328,12 +327,6 @@ public:
throw std::logic_error("TestServiceRegistry::getPerfLog() not implemented");
}
telemetry::Telemetry&
getTelemetry() override
{
throw std::logic_error("TestServiceRegistry::getTelemetry() not implemented");
}
// Configuration and state
bool
isStopping() const override

View File

@@ -80,12 +80,10 @@
#include <xrpl/protocol/Feature.h>
#include <xrpl/protocol/Indexes.h>
#include <xrpl/protocol/Protocol.h>
#include <xrpl/protocol/PublicKey.h>
#include <xrpl/protocol/STParsedJSON.h>
#include <xrpl/protocol/Serializer.h>
#include <xrpl/protocol/SystemParameters.h>
#include <xrpl/protocol/jss.h>
#include <xrpl/protocol/tokens.h>
#include <xrpl/rdb/DatabaseCon.h>
#include <xrpl/resource/Charge.h>
#include <xrpl/resource/Consumer.h>
@@ -99,7 +97,6 @@
#include <xrpl/shamap/SHAMap.h>
#include <xrpl/shamap/SHAMapMissingNode.h>
#include <xrpl/shamap/TreeNodeCache.h>
#include <xrpl/telemetry/Telemetry.h>
#include <xrpl/tx/apply.h>
#include <boost/algorithm/string/predicate.hpp>
@@ -214,7 +211,6 @@ public:
beast::Journal journal_;
std::unique_ptr<perf::PerfLog> perfLog_;
std::unique_ptr<telemetry::Telemetry> telemetry_;
Application::MutexType masterMutex_;
// Required by the SHAMapStore
@@ -324,15 +320,6 @@ public:
*this,
logs_->journal("PerfLog"),
[this] { signalStop("PerfLog"); }))
, telemetry_(
telemetry::makeTelemetry(
telemetry::setupTelemetry(
config_->section("telemetry"),
"", // Updated later via setServiceInstanceId()
BuildInfo::getVersionString(),
config_->networkId),
logs_->journal("Telemetry")))
, txMaster_(*this)
, collectorManager_(makeCollectorManager(
config_->section(Sections::kInsight),
@@ -661,12 +648,6 @@ public:
return *perfLog_;
}
telemetry::Telemetry&
getTelemetry() override
{
return *telemetry_;
}
NodeCache&
getTempNodeCache() override
{
@@ -1315,14 +1296,6 @@ ApplicationImp::setup(boost::program_options::variables_map const& cmdline)
nodeIdentity_ = getNodeIdentity(*this, cmdline);
// Now that the node identity is known, inject it into the telemetry
// resource attributes — but only if the user didn't already set a
// custom service_instance_id in [telemetry]. The Telemetry object
// was constructed with an empty serviceInstanceId because
// nodeIdentity_ is not available in the member initializer list.
if (!config_->section("telemetry").exists("service_instance_id"))
telemetry_->setServiceInstanceId(toBase58(TokenType::NodePublic, nodeIdentity_->first));
if (!cluster_->load(config().section(Sections::kClusterNodes)))
{
JLOG(journal_.fatal()) << "Invalid entry in cluster configuration.";
@@ -1535,7 +1508,6 @@ ApplicationImp::start(bool withTimers)
ledgerCleaner_->start();
perfLog_->start();
telemetry_->start();
}
void
@@ -1626,11 +1598,6 @@ ApplicationImp::run()
ledgerCleaner_->stop();
nodeStore_->stop();
perfLog_->stop();
// Telemetry must stop last among trace-producing components.
// serverHandler_, overlay_, and jobQueue_ are already stopped above,
// so no threads should be calling startSpan() at this point.
// See TODO in TelemetryImpl::stop() re: thread-safety of sdkProvider_.
telemetry_->stop();
JLOG(journal_.info()) << "Done.";
}