Move the standalone External Dashboard Parity design spec out of
docs/superpowers/ (which the project guidelines say not to create) and into
an appendix of OpenTelemetryPlan/06-implementation-phases.md, so the phase
plan is self-contained. Repoint the 10 "Source" links in the phase 3/4/7
task lists to the new appendix anchor.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Forward-merge the OTel naming-check Rule C/D fixes and the phase 2-9 chain.
Conflict resolutions:
- 02-design-decisions.md TxQ Attributes: take the convention-correct markdown
table (txq_* keys) over the stale planned-attrs code block.
- SpanGuardFactory.cpp: keep the explanatory comment for the literal attribute
keys in the libxrpl test.
Three entries in Phase4_taskList.md annotated dotted attribute keys
(`xrpl.consensus.round`, `round_id`, `ledger_id`) as "(kept — rule 5)". That
is wrong: rule 5 keeps SPAN NAMES dotted, not attribute keys — the code emits
the underscore form (consensus_round, consensus_round_id, consensus_ledger_id)
per ConsensusSpanNames.h. Remove the false justification; the dotted form in
this task list remains as the illustrative-readability form documented in the
note at the top of the file.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Bring phase-3 forward into phase 4 (consensus tracing). Phase 4 introduces
ConsensusSpanNames.h (and already did the trusted→proposal/validation rename
and underscore-attr conversion in ffc197b914).
Conflict resolution (reviewed by a code-review agent before commit):
- 02-design-decisions.md §2.4 Consensus Attributes: merge-both — kept phase-3's
underscore table form AND folded in phase-4's richer "Phase 4a" attribute set
(round_id, ledger_id, trace_strategy, converge/establish/disputes counts,
agree/disagree counts, threshold_percent, consensus_result, mode_old/new),
each mapped to its authoritative ConsensusSpanNames.h constant. Dropped the
planned-but-unimplemented proposers_agreed/proposers_total (no code constant;
agree_count/disagree_count serve that role).
- SpanGuardFactory.cpp: kept phase-4's explanatory comment about why a libxrpl
test uses literal keys, plus the converted command/rpc_status keys.
Naming check passes (100 keys across 8 *SpanNames.h headers, including consensus).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Bring phase-2 forward into phase 3 (transaction tracing). Phase 3 introduces
TxSpanNames.h, TxQSpanNames.h, and TxApplySpanNames.h.
Conflict resolution:
- TxQ.cpp: kept phase-3's txq_span-based instrumentation (phase-2 had none).
Dropped the orphaned `NumberSO{... fixUniversalNumber}` line — develop's
#5962 (Retire fixUniversalNumber) removed that symbol repo-wide; the
conflict block had carried one stale copy that would not compile.
- 05/08/OpenTelemetryPlan.md: dropped the deleted 04-code-samples / POC_taskList
references (carried from phase-2), kept phase-3's new secure-OTel.md doc rows,
section, and Mermaid node/edge/style. Config code block -> prose; merged the
secure-OTel hardening pointer with the authoritative-config prose.
- Phase3_taskList.md: removed the "dotted keys for readability" note that came
from phase-2 — phase 3 already uses the underscore keys.
Reviewed by code-review agents: telemetry instrumentation intact, naming check
green (47 keys across 7 *SpanNames.h headers), no conflict markers.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The Phase3/4/5 task lists show attribute keys in the older dotted
`xrpl.<domain>.<field>` form because that mirrors how a fully qualified
attribute reads in a Tempo trace view, which keeps the planning prose readable.
Add a note to each clarifying that the implemented keys follow the underscore
convention in CONTRIBUTING.md and that the *SpanNames.h constants (enforced by
the CI naming check) are the single source of truth — so the dotted form here
is illustrative, not the literal key.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Fix quorum attribute to use actual validator quorum instead of proposer
count, add missing ConsensusState::Expired handling in haveConsensus()
span, move ConsensusSpanNames.h to xrpld/consensus/ to resolve
levelization cycle, remove unused constants, enrich proposal receive
span with sequence, and correct stale documentation references.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Update Phase4_taskList.md and 06-implementation-phases.md to reflect
completed implementation of all remaining Phase 4/4a tasks (4.2-4.6,
4a.5, 4a.6, 4a.8). Update exit criteria and summary tables.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Record the close time voting threshold and consensus state on
consensus.update_positions and consensus.check spans:
- xrpl.consensus.close_time_threshold: the avCT_CONSENSUS_PCT (75%)
threshold required for close time agreement
- xrpl.consensus.have_close_time_consensus: whether validators
reached close time consensus in this iteration
These attributes enable dashboards to show how the close time
voting process converges (or stalls) across consensus iterations.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Instrument the consensus subsystem with OpenTelemetry spans covering
the full round lifecycle: round start, establish phase, proposal send,
ledger close, position updates, consensus check, accept, validation
send, and mode changes.
Key design choices adapted from the original Phase 4 implementation
to the new SpanGuard factory pattern introduced in Phase 3:
- Add SpanGuard::hashSpan() for category-gated hash-derived trace IDs
(consensus round spans share trace_id across validators via ledger hash)
- Add SpanGuard::addEvent() overload with key-value attribute pairs
(used for dispute.resolve events during position updates)
- Add ConsensusSpanNames.h with compile-time span name constants
following the colocated *SpanNames.h pattern from Phase 3
- Add consensusTraceStrategy config option ("deterministic"/"attribute")
for cross-node trace correlation strategy selection
- Use SpanGuard::linkedSpan() for follows-from relationships between
consecutive rounds and cross-thread validation spans
- Use SpanGuard::captureContext() for thread-safe context propagation
from consensus thread to jtACCEPT worker thread
Spans produced: consensus.round, consensus.proposal.send,
consensus.ledger_close, consensus.establish, consensus.update_positions,
consensus.check, consensus.accept, consensus.accept.apply,
consensus.validation.send, consensus.mode_change
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Replace references to old XRPL_TRACE_TX/CONSENSUS macros with
SpanGuard::span(TraceCategory, ...) factory calls introduced in Phase 1c.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Fix quorum attribute to use actual validator quorum instead of proposer
count, add missing ConsensusState::Expired handling in haveConsensus()
span, move ConsensusSpanNames.h to xrpld/consensus/ to resolve
levelization cycle, remove unused constants, enrich proposal receive
span with sequence, and correct stale documentation references.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Update Phase4_taskList.md and 06-implementation-phases.md to reflect
completed implementation of all remaining Phase 4/4a tasks (4.2-4.6,
4a.5, 4a.6, 4a.8). Update exit criteria and summary tables.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Record the close time voting threshold and consensus state on
consensus.update_positions and consensus.check spans:
- xrpl.consensus.close_time_threshold: the avCT_CONSENSUS_PCT (75%)
threshold required for close time agreement
- xrpl.consensus.have_close_time_consensus: whether validators
reached close time consensus in this iteration
These attributes enable dashboards to show how the close time
voting process converges (or stalls) across consensus iterations.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Instrument the consensus subsystem with OpenTelemetry spans covering
the full round lifecycle: round start, establish phase, proposal send,
ledger close, position updates, consensus check, accept, validation
send, and mode changes.
Key design choices adapted from the original Phase 4 implementation
to the new SpanGuard factory pattern introduced in Phase 3:
- Add SpanGuard::hashSpan() for category-gated hash-derived trace IDs
(consensus round spans share trace_id across validators via ledger hash)
- Add SpanGuard::addEvent() overload with key-value attribute pairs
(used for dispute.resolve events during position updates)
- Add ConsensusSpanNames.h with compile-time span name constants
following the colocated *SpanNames.h pattern from Phase 3
- Add consensusTraceStrategy config option ("deterministic"/"attribute")
for cross-node trace correlation strategy selection
- Use SpanGuard::linkedSpan() for follows-from relationships between
consecutive rounds and cross-thread validation spans
- Use SpanGuard::captureContext() for thread-safe context propagation
from consensus thread to jtACCEPT worker thread
Spans produced: consensus.round, consensus.proposal.send,
consensus.ledger_close, consensus.establish, consensus.update_positions,
consensus.check, consensus.accept, consensus.accept.apply,
consensus.validation.send, consensus.mode_change
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Replace references to old XRPL_TRACE_TX/CONSENSUS macros with
SpanGuard::span(TraceCategory, ...) factory calls introduced in Phase 1c.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Introduces task list documents for Phases 2 through 5, with Tempo
references (replacing Jaeger) and Task 2.8 dashboard parity spec.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Fix remaining Jaeger references that accumulated across intermediate
branches in the stacked PR chain. These were in files modified by
multiple phases where the per-branch fixes didn't cover all additions.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Adds ledger_hash, validation.full to validation send/receive spans,
and validation_quorum, proposers_validated to consensus.accept spans.
Foundation for Phase 7 ValidationTracker agreement computation.
Part of the external dashboard parity initiative across phases 2-11.
See docs/superpowers/specs/2026-03-30-external-dashboard-parity-design.md
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
