Commit Graph

15708 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Pratik Mankawde
91f783ea32 Merge branch 'pratik/otel-phase5-docs-deployment' into pratik/otel-phase6-statsd 2026-09-18 10:01:48 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
633f6c98ab Merge branch 'pratik/otel-phase4-consensus-tracing' into pratik/otel-phase5-docs-deployment 2026-09-18 10:01:48 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
f05c09514b Merge branch 'pratik/otel-phase3-tx-tracing' into pratik/otel-phase4-consensus-tracing 2026-09-18 10:01:48 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
660535c4d8 merge: bring the plan-doc suppressed cleanup forward from phase-2
The acceptance table conflicted because this branch had added four criteria to
it. Kept them, and took the incoming HashRouter row.
2026-09-18 10:01:30 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
6e4d566ba6 Merge branch 'pratik/otel-phase5-docs-deployment' into pratik/otel-phase6-statsd 2026-09-18 10:00:51 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
84ff06ecec Merge branch 'pratik/otel-phase4-consensus-tracing' into pratik/otel-phase5-docs-deployment 2026-09-18 10:00:51 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
b2b5879e8e Merge branch 'pratik/otel-phase3-tx-tracing' into pratik/otel-phase4-consensus-tracing 2026-09-18 10:00:51 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
3d21e7e13f Merge branch 'pratik/otel-phase1c-rpc-integration' into pratik/otel-phase2-rpc-tracing 2026-09-18 10:00:51 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
bab53ef8d0 Merge branch 'pratik/otel-phase1b-telemetry-infra' into pratik/otel-phase1c-rpc-integration 2026-09-18 10:00:51 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
cf2d412554 Merge branch 'pratik/otel-phase1a-plan-docs' into pratik/otel-phase1b-telemetry-infra 2026-09-18 10:00:51 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
073ff1a93f docs(telemetry): drop the suppressed row from the attribute reference
tx.receive does not set it. The span starts after the duplicate check, so a
dropped copy produces no span for the attribute to sit on.
2026-09-18 09:55:45 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
a0a23f0b61 docs(telemetry): match the task list to where the receive span now starts
The steps described setting a suppressed attribute on a dropped duplicate. The
span is now created after the duplicate check, so there is no span on that path.
2026-09-18 09:55:14 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
811579b615 docs(telemetry): drop the suppressed attribute from the design tables
The tx.receive span is created after the duplicate check, so it carries no
suppressed attribute and a dropped copy produces no span at all. How many were
dropped is the transactions_duplicate traffic category.
2026-09-18 09:54:39 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
675dffdc71 docs(telemetry): drop suppressed from the tx.receive attribute list
The span is created after the duplicate check, so it never carries the
attribute, and the row now says which transactions it covers.
2026-09-18 09:31:23 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
e87432fe3c fix(telemetry): drop the suppressed references the span no longer emits
tx.receive is created after the duplicate check, so it never carries a
suppressed attribute. The Tempo tag filter and the dashboard panel still
referenced it, and check_otel_naming rules C and D fail on a reference with no
constant behind it.

The panel keeps its remaining signal as a plain receive rate. How many relayed
copies were dropped is the transactions_duplicate traffic category, which does
not depend on a span.

The spanmetrics dimension goes too; a dimension for an attribute nothing sets
only widens the label set.
2026-09-18 09:24:56 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
6024954459 Merge branch 'pratik/otel-phase4-consensus-tracing' into pratik/otel-phase5-docs-deployment 2026-09-17 23:01:47 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
8c10cd710d Merge branch 'pratik/otel-phase5-docs-deployment' into pratik/otel-phase6-statsd 2026-09-17 23:01:47 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
c0c9478093 Merge branch 'pratik/otel-phase3-tx-tracing' into pratik/otel-phase4-consensus-tracing 2026-09-17 23:01:35 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
fe4a778fed perf(telemetry): trace only the transactions this node will process
A peer relays every transaction it hears, so most inbound copies are ones
handleTransaction() drops. The tx.receive span was created before those checks
ran, so every dropped copy paid for a span, a hex transaction id, and an
open-ledger index read that takes the mutex the apply path needs.

Measured over a four-hour payment run: 83.2M of 101.1M tx.receive spans
described a copy the node dropped. That is 82% of this span and 23% of every
span the node emitted.

Move the span and its attributes below the duplicate check. How many copies
were dropped is already reported as the transactions_duplicate traffic
category, which costs no span. Why a copy was dropped is no longer recorded;
a labelled counter restores it on the branch that carries the metric registry.

The suppressed attribute and the suppressed and rejected_inner_batch status
values go with it. This function was their only user.
2026-09-17 23:00:59 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
177e229aa9 Merge branch 'pratik/otel-phase1c-rpc-integration' into pratik/otel-phase2-rpc-tracing 2026-09-17 17:01:20 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
c1086e63a2 Merge branch 'pratik/otel-phase4-consensus-tracing' into pratik/otel-phase5-docs-deployment 2026-09-17 17:01:20 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
aea4431807 Merge branch 'pratik/otel-phase5-docs-deployment' into pratik/otel-phase6-statsd 2026-09-17 17:01:20 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
de3e376944 Merge branch 'pratik/otel-phase3-tx-tracing' into pratik/otel-phase4-consensus-tracing 2026-09-17 17:01:20 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
94bdd19608 Merge branch 'pratik/otel-phase2-rpc-tracing' into pratik/otel-phase3-tx-tracing 2026-09-17 17:01:20 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
4553fbf2a5 merge: bring the single telemetry switch forward from phase-1b
CMakeLists conflicted: this branch had rewritten the description to name
SpanGuard, phase-1b removed the option() call. Kept both — this branch's wording
with phase-1b's structure.
2026-09-17 17:01:07 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
e52f235356 build: make the Conan option the only telemetry switch
CMakeLists declared option(telemetry) with a default of its own, so the setting
had two homes and they were free to disagree. The Conan option already reaches
CMake without it: conanfile.py forwards the option into the generated toolchain,
which sets the variable this file reads, and every build here goes through Conan.

Drop the option() call and keep the if(telemetry) test. docs/build/telemetry.md
told readers a CMake option had to be set as well, so that goes with it.
2026-09-17 16:54:03 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
75661c3a33 Merge branch 'pratik/otel-phase4-consensus-tracing' into pratik/otel-phase5-docs-deployment 2026-09-15 16:17:44 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
260bc7f2ed Merge branch 'pratik/otel-phase5-docs-deployment' into pratik/otel-phase6-statsd 2026-09-15 16:17:44 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
a910a2dc91 Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/develop' into pratik/otel-phase1a-plan-docs 2026-09-15 16:17:43 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
9545ab4d4e Merge branch 'pratik/otel-phase1c-rpc-integration' into pratik/otel-phase2-rpc-tracing 2026-09-15 16:17:43 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
5b10ef0d56 Merge branch 'pratik/otel-phase3-tx-tracing' into pratik/otel-phase4-consensus-tracing 2026-09-15 16:17:43 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
b14c537df1 Merge branch 'pratik/otel-phase2-rpc-tracing' into pratik/otel-phase3-tx-tracing 2026-09-15 16:17:43 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
6a0642817d Merge branch 'pratik/otel-phase1b-telemetry-infra' into pratik/otel-phase1c-rpc-integration 2026-09-15 16:17:43 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
d008b2f641 Merge branch 'pratik/otel-phase1a-plan-docs' into pratik/otel-phase1b-telemetry-infra 2026-09-15 16:17:43 +01:00
Bart
e302e4eeed fix: Set the peer limit total when per-direction limits are configured (#8220)
Co-authored-by: Bart <11445373+bthomee@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Vito Tumas <5780819+Tapanito@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-09-15 13:14:12 +00:00
Mayukha Vadari
1a4a40ebb8 fix: Update noripple_check to exclude transactions field on error responses (#6303)
Co-authored-by: Timur Yalymov <36795566+tyalymov@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Co-authored-by: Vito Tumas <5780819+Tapanito@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Ayaz Salikhov <mathbunnyru@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-09-15 00:21:57 +00:00
Pratik Mankawde
7b41b00bab test(insight): drop two includes the StatsD collector test never uses
clang-tidy's include-cleaner flags Counter.h and Gauge.h here: the test
names neither type, so the includes fail CI under warnings-as-errors.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-14 23:47:14 +01:00
yinyiqian1
7f55dd390c feat: Support mirror key epochs in confidential MPT transactions for Key Rotation amendment (#8210) 2026-09-14 18:23:38 +00:00
Pratik Mankawde
c73cecdb24 revert: drop the StatsD collection-lifecycle calls this branch cannot compile
0eb4291688 added collector->onCollectionReady() to both StatsD tests. That
method does not exist on this branch: it is introduced later, alongside the
polling gate it belongs to, so all four build legs and clang-tidy failed.

Nothing gates polling here. The StatsDCollectorImp constructor starts its
thread, run() calls setTimer() unconditionally, and onTimer polls metrics_
and drains the buffers every second. The gauge test's expectation already
holds without any lifecycle call, because StatsDGaugeImpl starts dirty so a
untouched gauge emits its zero on the first flush.

Restores the two includes that commit also dropped.
2026-09-14 16:31:16 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
e0b9810a08 docs(telemetry): correct the standalone span table and bound the Tempo queries
The Payment destination was not a valid XRPL address — its base58 checksum
does not match — so Test 1 Step 4 and Test 2 Step 7 could never have returned
the tesSUCCESS they claim. Use a valid one and note that the destination does
not need to exist.

The Tempo search loop had no -G, so curl posted the parameters as a body,
Tempo answered 200 while ignoring the query, and every span name came back
non-zero. It also had no time bound, and Tempo keeps blocks for an hour, so a
re-run was answered by the previous run's traces. Add -G, RUN_START, and
start/end, matching what integration-test.sh already does.

Split the query list in two: 35 names that should be present, and 8 that need
a trigger neither test performs, where zero is the expected answer. Previously
two of the latter sat in the pass/fail list and read as failures.

Correct the standalone span table. consensus.mode_change fires once per round
start whether or not the mode changes, ledger.validate cannot fire because
checkAccept is unreachable in standalone, and the apply-stage, TxQ and ledger
families were missing rows. Give each "No" row the reason that actually
applies: the establish phase, a missing validator key, or no peers.

Also: ledger_accept is not required before submit, the teardown pgrep matched
more than this node, [peer_private] also disables the inbound listener, and
the 15-second wait covers Tempo but not Prometheus.
2026-09-11 11:30:00 +01:00
Sergey Kuznetsov
9403736199 ci: Exclude Rust unit tests from code coverage (#8203) 2026-09-10 11:38:25 +00:00
Mayukha Vadari
028783661d feat: Apply .macro changes from ripple/smart-escrow (#8157)
Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-09-09 20:05:58 +00:00
Pratik Mankawde
988015dc65 merge: bring the OTLP gRPC exporter rename forward from phase5-docs-deployment
Conflict in docker/telemetry/otel-collector-config.yaml, in the service
pipelines: this branch renamed the deprecated spanmetrics connector to
span_metrics and adds the statsd metrics pipeline, while upstream renamed the
deprecated otlp exporter to otlp_grpc. Both kept.

With both renames present the collector now starts with no deprecation
warnings at all, which was the point of the pair.
2026-09-09 19:17:07 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
49a3302e29 Merge branch 'pratik/otel-phase4-consensus-tracing' into pratik/otel-phase5-docs-deployment 2026-09-09 19:16:08 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
c0024c7c57 Merge branch 'pratik/otel-phase3-tx-tracing' into pratik/otel-phase4-consensus-tracing 2026-09-09 19:16:08 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
b98a9d3d13 Merge branch 'pratik/otel-phase2-rpc-tracing' into pratik/otel-phase3-tx-tracing 2026-09-09 19:16:08 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
4dc706c606 merge: bring the OTLP gRPC exporter rename forward from phase1c-rpc-integration
Conflict in docker/telemetry/otel-collector-config.yaml, in the traces
pipeline: this branch added the attributes/hash processor while upstream
renamed the deprecated otlp exporter to otlp_grpc. Both sides kept — the
processor list keeps attributes/hash and the exporter list takes the new name.
Checked that the exporter definition key was renamed to match the reference,
and that the collector still loads the merged config.
2026-09-09 19:15:52 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
282ce3620d Merge branch 'pratik/otel-phase1b-telemetry-infra' into pratik/otel-phase1c-rpc-integration 2026-09-09 19:13:28 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
c622da5a76 refactor(telemetry): use the current name for the span metrics connector
The pinned collector warns on every start that "spanmetrics" is a deprecated
alias for "span_metrics". Rename the connector, its pipeline references and
the prose that names it.

The derived metric names are untouched. They come from the connector's
`namespace` setting rather than its component name, so occurrences inside a
metric name such as traces_spanmetrics_calls_total are deliberately left as
they are; renaming those would break every span panel. The rename is applied
only to the bare word, never where it is joined to a metric name by
underscores.

This branch introduces the connector, so the change belongs here.
2026-09-09 15:40:11 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
87457446be refactor(telemetry): use the current name for the OTLP gRPC exporter
The pinned collector warns on every start that "otlp" is a deprecated alias
for "otlp_grpc". Rename the trace exporter to otlp_grpc/tempo.

Only the exporter is affected. The otlp RECEIVER keeps its name: it serves
both gRPC and HTTP under one component and is not deprecated, verified by
renaming the exporter alone and seeing the warning stop.

This belongs on this branch because it introduces the exporter, and it is the
last of four deprecated aliases in the collector config; the other three are
owned by later branches in the chain.
2026-09-09 15:40:09 +01:00