Commit Graph

15175 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Pratik Mankawde
379241c593 Merge branch 'pratik/otel-phase5-docs-deployment' into pratik/otel-phase6-statsd 2026-07-29 16:05:13 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
c373165882 Merge branch 'pratik/otel-phase4-consensus-tracing' into pratik/otel-phase5-docs-deployment 2026-07-29 16:04:51 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
9c5fac607b Merge branch 'pratik/otel-phase3-tx-tracing' into pratik/otel-phase4-consensus-tracing 2026-07-29 16:04:30 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
07279defd1 Merge branch 'pratik/otel-phase2-rpc-tracing' into pratik/otel-phase3-tx-tracing 2026-07-29 16:04:07 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
3f9a17c54f Merge branch 'pratik/otel-phase1c-rpc-integration' into pratik/otel-phase2-rpc-tracing
Conflict in processSession(): this branch added the request-payload-size
attribute on the same lines where the incoming change reverted
processRequest() from bool back to void. Kept both — the payload-size
attribute stays, and the call no longer captures a return value. The
trailing status block takes the incoming side, which leaves the
rpc.http_request span's status unset.
2026-07-29 16:03:58 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
3715b7a2a3 fix(telemetry): correct RPC and gRPC span status reporting
Six related defects in the RPC/gRPC span surface, all cases where a failure
was recorded as success or an attribute was missing on an error path.

GRPCServer: the non-exception branch set the span Ok unconditionally, then
sent a possibly-failed grpc::Status. The handler can return a non-OK status
without throwing, so every failed call traced as successful. Status now
follows result.second, with the error message as the span description.

ServerHandler: eight per-item error branches appended an error reply without
recording that the request failed. Batch responses and ripplerpc < 3.0 always
carry HTTP 200, so those failures were invisible and an entirely failed batch
ended its span as successful. Added an appendItemError() helper next to the
existing httpReplyError() lambda and routed all eight sites through it, so the
flag cannot be forgotten at a new call site.

ServerHandler: the early-return validation paths set the span error but not the
rpc_status attribute. Added it to httpReplyError() so every such path gets it.

RPCHandler: the fillHandler error path set only command and rpc_status, while
callMethod sets command, version and rpc_role. Error spans were therefore not
filterable by API version or role. The error path now mirrors that set.

RPCHandler: resolveCommandSpanName() checked only that command/method were
present, not that they agreed, while fillHandler rejects a mismatch as
rpcUNKNOWN_COMMAND. A request supplying both with different values was labelled
with one of the two names, misattributing the error to a command that never
dispatched. It now mirrors fillHandler's rule and collapses to "unknown".

ServerHandler: processRequest returned bool solely so the caller could set its
span status. Telemetry should read state, not shape the signature of the code it
observes, so the signature returns to void and rpc.process sets its own status
from spanHadError. The enclosing rpc.http_request span now leaves status unset:
the OTel spec has instrumentation leave status unset unless the operation itself
errored, and reserves Ok for an operator asserting verified success.
2026-07-29 16:02:19 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
35a0896fc5 Merge branch 'pratik/otel-phase3-tx-tracing' into pratik/otel-phase4-consensus-tracing
Conflict in src/libxrpl/telemetry/SpanGuard.cpp: both sides added a different
include in the same alphabetical slot — phase-4 added <initializer_list>, the
incoming std::format change added <format>. Both are required, so both are
kept in sorted order.
2026-07-29 15:08:52 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
5e60f1b842 Merge branch 'pratik/otel-phase2-rpc-tracing' into pratik/otel-phase3-tx-tracing 2026-07-29 15:07:59 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
fb24fa67e2 Merge branch 'pratik/otel-phase1c-rpc-integration' into pratik/otel-phase2-rpc-tracing 2026-07-29 15:07:59 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
646ff1bc5a Merge branch 'pratik/otel-phase1b-telemetry-infra' into pratik/otel-phase1c-rpc-integration 2026-07-29 15:07:16 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
17ff797633 refactor(telemetry): build span names with std::format
SpanGuard::span() and freshRoot() joined the prefix and suffix by hand with
reserve() + three append() calls. std::format expresses the same join in one
line; libstdc++ has shipped <format> since GCC 13 and the project floor is
GCC 15.2 (BUILD.md), so it is available on every supported compiler.

Both callers are noexcept and std::format can throw (std::bad_alloc, or
std::format_error on a malformed spec), so an escaping exception would
terminate the process. The call is wrapped in a joinSpanName() helper that
catches and returns std::nullopt; the caller then returns a null guard, which
is the same degrade-to-no-op path already taken when telemetry is disabled.
Telemetry must never bring the node down.

One helper rather than a try/catch at each site keeps both call sites a single
line and puts the exception-safety requirement in one documented place.

Addresses a review comment on PR #6437.
2026-07-29 15:06:31 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
87078dca6e Merge branch 'pratik/otel-phase1a-plan-docs' into pratik/otel-phase1b-telemetry-infra
Conflict in OpenTelemetryPlan/03-implementation-strategy.md §3.9: both
branches independently fixed the same defect (stale hand-maintained line
counts) in different ways.

- 1b (0ff947454c) stripped the Lines Added / Lines Changed columns but kept
  the §3.9.1 and §3.9.2 tables.
- 1a (3ad525a48a) removed both sections outright.

Resolved in favour of 1a's deletion. The tables were pre-implementation
estimates with no source of truth, so trimming the columns only defers the
next drift; the file/component lists duplicated §3.1's directory tree, which
1b already keeps current (DiscardFlag.h, FilteringSpanProcessor). Keeping the
upstream resolution also stops the same conflict recurring on 1c..10.

1b-specific content verified intact after the merge: §3.1 retains the
DiscardFlag.h entry, the FilteringSpanProcessor and discard() annotations,
and the TracingInstrumentation removal. No references to the deleted
sections remain in any plan doc.
2026-07-29 14:35:33 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
3ad525a48a docs(telemetry): drop speculative file/line estimate tables from §3.9
The §3.9.1 "Files Modified Summary" and §3.9.2 "Detailed File Impact"
tables carried hand-maintained per-component line counts that had drifted
from the plan: the Lines Added column summed to 1,565 while the Total row
claimed ~1,670. Files (34) and Lines Changed (120) reconciled, so only the
Added total was stale — residue from expanding Core Telemetry 5 -> 11 files.

Rather than patch one cell, remove both tables. They were pre-implementation
estimates with no source of truth, so any figure in them drifts again on the
next phase. §3.1's directory tree remains the canonical list of the 11 new
telemetry files, and §3.9.3-3.9.7 (risk, architectural impact, backward
compatibility, rollback) carry the assessment without inventing line counts.

No references to the removed sections exist elsewhere in the plan docs.
2026-07-29 14:33:05 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
f9d519e8af Merge branch 'pratik/otel-phase5-docs-deployment' into pratik/otel-phase6-statsd 2026-07-29 14:20:05 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
fb19db68a2 Merge branch 'pratik/otel-phase4-consensus-tracing' into pratik/otel-phase5-docs-deployment 2026-07-29 14:20:04 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
ded4c599a6 Merge branch 'pratik/otel-phase3-tx-tracing' into pratik/otel-phase4-consensus-tracing 2026-07-29 14:19:44 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
c6b56a5e97 Merge branch 'pratik/otel-phase2-rpc-tracing' into pratik/otel-phase3-tx-tracing 2026-07-29 14:19:08 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
6e6f468ac4 Merge branch 'pratik/otel-phase1c-rpc-integration' into pratik/otel-phase2-rpc-tracing
Signed-off-by: Pratik Mankawde <3397372+pratikmankawde@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-07-29 14:10:45 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
6b6a23df4e Merge branch 'pratik/otel-phase1b-telemetry-infra' into pratik/otel-phase1c-rpc-integration 2026-07-29 14:09:48 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
72d4e5a45c Merge branch 'pratik/otel-phase1a-plan-docs' into pratik/otel-phase1b-telemetry-infra 2026-07-29 14:09:32 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
1ac0a32573 Merge branch 'develop' into pratik/otel-phase1a-plan-docs
Signed-off-by: Pratik Mankawde <3397372+pratikmankawde@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-07-29 14:07:58 +01:00
Alex Kremer
86832edc70 chore: Move semantic version tests to gtest (#7872)
Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-07-27 18:48:53 +00:00
Pratik Mankawde
b7d25c43e6 Merge branch 'pratik/otel-phase5-docs-deployment' into pratik/otel-phase6-statsd 2026-07-27 19:48:39 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
f7c7b906ec Merge branch 'pratik/otel-phase4-consensus-tracing' into pratik/otel-phase5-docs-deployment 2026-07-27 19:48:39 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
b50aa17aee fix(consensus): include ConsensusSpanNames.h where its symbols are used
Both files use telemetry::consensus::span::* but reached the declarations
only transitively, which misc-include-cleaner rejects. Add the direct
include now that the header lives under xrpl/consensus/.
2026-07-27 19:48:26 +01:00
Ayaz Salikhov
ff7fff2cf2 style: Make clang-tidy format files using clang-format rules (#7880) 2026-07-27 18:39:53 +00:00
Pratik Mankawde
3e3f59b7bd Merge branch 'pratik/otel-phase5-docs-deployment' into pratik/otel-phase6-statsd 2026-07-27 19:14:29 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
1df4e80907 Merge branch 'pratik/otel-phase4-consensus-tracing' into pratik/otel-phase5-docs-deployment 2026-07-27 19:14:29 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
496ac21259 Merge branch 'pratik/otel-phase3-tx-tracing' into pratik/otel-phase4-consensus-tracing 2026-07-27 19:14:29 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
c2aad445c1 fix(tx): satisfy clang-tidy in the tx apply stage span helper
clang-tidy had been skipped on this branch while CMake configure was
failing, so these findings in makeStageSpan surfaced only now:

- brace the three single-statement if bodies (readability-braces-around-statements)
- compare the pointer parameter explicitly against nullptr
  (readability-implicit-bool-conversion)
- include xrpl/protocol/Protocol.h for LedgerIndex (misc-include-cleaner)
2026-07-27 19:14:19 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
8bc5285983 Merge branch 'pratik/otel-phase5-docs-deployment' into pratik/otel-phase6-statsd 2026-07-27 19:03:29 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
1aa8521357 Merge branch 'pratik/otel-phase4-consensus-tracing' into pratik/otel-phase5-docs-deployment 2026-07-27 19:03:29 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
9edb1ce60b fix(build): link telemetry into the consensus module
The consensus headers moved into the isolated xrpl/consensus module and
took a dependency on xrpl/telemetry for the tracing span constants, but
two things were left behind:

- Four includes still pointed at the old src/xrpld/consensus/ location,
  which no longer exists, so the build failed with
  "fatal error: 'xrpld/consensus/ConsensusParms.h' file not found".
- xrpl.libxrpl.consensus never linked xrpl.libxrpl.telemetry. add_module
  isolates each module's headers, so xrpl/telemetry/SpanNames.h was not
  on the include path even once the include was repointed.

Repoint the stale includes at xrpl/consensus/, and declare the telemetry
module before consensus so consensus can link it. Regenerate ordering.txt
for the resulting edge.
2026-07-27 19:03:13 +01:00
Mayukha Vadari
2db631c915 ci: Change server_definitions upload config name (#7878) 2026-07-27 17:42:07 +00:00
Pratik Mankawde
249e407bb1 Merge branch 'pratik/otel-phase5-docs-deployment' into pratik/otel-phase6-statsd 2026-07-27 18:32:25 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
fbd512e51d Merge branch 'pratik/otel-phase4-consensus-tracing' into pratik/otel-phase5-docs-deployment 2026-07-27 18:32:25 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
bc6c917cf8 Merge branch 'pratik/otel-phase3-tx-tracing' into pratik/otel-phase4-consensus-tracing 2026-07-27 18:32:25 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
5a44eb7b1f fix(build): remove duplicate add_module(xrpl tx) declaration
The phase-2 merge re-added the pre-telemetry `add_module(xrpl tx)` block
without removing it, leaving the module declared twice. CMake's
add_library rejects a repeated target name, so configure failed before
any compilation:

  add_library cannot create target "xrpl.libxrpl.tx" because another
  target with the same name already exists.

Drop the stale pre-telemetry block and keep the one that follows
add_module(xrpl telemetry), which links both ledger and telemetry.
libxrpl/tx needs the telemetry link for the tx.transactor span, and
levelization already records `libxrpl.tx > xrpl.telemetry`.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-27 18:32:13 +01:00
Alex Kremer
6c9c7f0555 chore: Trivial gtest migrations (#7865) 2026-07-27 16:34:53 +00:00
Pratik Mankawde
4bf2d0a67e Merge branch 'pratik/otel-phase5-docs-deployment' into pratik/otel-phase6-statsd 2026-07-27 17:04:38 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
6a57e76222 Merge branch 'pratik/otel-phase4-consensus-tracing' into pratik/otel-phase5-docs-deployment 2026-07-27 17:04:21 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
0aebf47df4 Merge branch 'pratik/otel-phase3-tx-tracing' into pratik/otel-phase4-consensus-tracing
Signed-off-by: Pratik Mankawde <3397372+pratikmankawde@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-07-27 17:03:59 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
23d5271eb6 Merge branch 'pratik/otel-phase2-rpc-tracing' into pratik/otel-phase3-tx-tracing
Signed-off-by: Pratik Mankawde <3397372+pratikmankawde@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-07-27 16:58:48 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
58fa19735e Merge branch 'pratik/otel-phase1c-rpc-integration' into pratik/otel-phase2-rpc-tracing
Signed-off-by: Pratik Mankawde <3397372+pratikmankawde@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-07-27 16:56:51 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
7e5f726388 Merge branch 'pratik/otel-phase1b-telemetry-infra' into pratik/otel-phase1c-rpc-integration 2026-07-27 16:56:15 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
42a6fe8885 Merge branch 'pratik/otel-phase1a-plan-docs' into pratik/otel-phase1b-telemetry-infra
Signed-off-by: Pratik Mankawde <3397372+pratikmankawde@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-07-27 16:55:39 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
a5299f86f7 Merge branch 'develop' into pratik/otel-phase1a-plan-docs
Signed-off-by: Pratik Mankawde <3397372+pratikmankawde@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-07-27 16:54:28 +01:00
Ayaz Salikhov
9466ecb5c2 ci: Group github-actions dependabot updates (#7876) 2026-07-27 14:32:53 +00:00
Sergey Kuznetsov
e0aa50c4be ci: Update CI image and prepare-runner action (#7874) 2026-07-27 14:18:01 +00:00
Andrzej Budzanowski
29120dfcbd test: Migrate nodestore tests from Beast to GTest (#7292)
Co-authored-by: Marek Foss <marek.foss@neti-soft.com>
Co-authored-by: Alex Kremer <akremer@ripple.com>
2026-07-27 13:00:14 +00:00