When an AMM account is deleted, the owner directory entries must be
deleted in order to ensure consistent ledger state.
* When deleting AMM account:
* Clean up AMM owner dir, linking AMM account and AMM object
* Delete trust lines to AMM
* Disallow `CheckCreate` to AMM accounts
* AMM cannot cash a check
* Constrain entries in AuthAccounts array to be accounts
* AuthAccounts is an array of objects for the AMMBid transaction
* SetTrust (TrustSet): Allow on AMM only for LP tokens
* If the destination is an AMM account and the trust line doesn't
exist, then:
* If the asset is not the AMM LP token, then fail the tx with
`tecNO_PERMISSION`
* If the AMM is in empty state, then fail the tx with `tecAMM_EMPTY`
* This disallows trustlines to AMM in empty state
* Add AMMID to AMM root account
* Remove lsfAMM flag and use sfAMMID instead
* Remove owner dir entry for ltAMM
* Add `AMMDelete` transaction type to handle amortized deletion
* Limit number of trust lines to delete on final withdraw + AMMDelete
* Put AMM in empty state when LPTokens is 0 upon final withdraw
* Add `tfTwoAssetIfEmpty` deposit option in AMM empty state
* Fail all AMM transactions in AMM empty state except special deposit
* Add `tecINCOMPLETE` to indicate that not all AMM trust lines are
deleted (i.e. partial deletion)
* This is handled in Transactor similar to deleted offers
* Fail AMMDelete with `tecINTERNAL` if AMM root account is nullptr
* Don't validate for invalid asset pair in AMMDelete
* AMMWithdraw deletes AMM trust lines and AMM account/object only if the
number of trust lines is less than max
* Current `maxDeletableAMMTrustLines` = 512
* Check no directory left after AMM trust lines are deleted
* Enable partial trustline deletion in AMMWithdraw
* Add `tecAMM_NOT_EMPTY` to fail any transaction that expects an AMM in
empty state
* Clawback considerations
* Disallow clawback out of AMM account
* Disallow AMM create if issuer can claw back
This patch applies to the AMM implementation in #4294.
Acknowledgements:
Richard Holland and Nik Bougalis for responsibly disclosing this issue.
Bug Bounties and Responsible Disclosures:
We welcome reviews of the project code and urge researchers to
responsibly disclose any issues they may find.
To report a bug, please send a detailed report to:
bugs@xrpl.org
Signed-off-by: Manoj Doshi <mdoshi@ripple.com>
Reason for this change is here XRPLF/XRPL-Standards#119
We would want to be explicit that this flag is exclusively for trustline. For new token types(eg. CFT), they will not utilize this flag for clawback, instead, they will turn clawback on/off on the token-level, which is more versatile.
Add AMM functionality:
- InstanceCreate
- Deposit
- Withdraw
- Governance
- Auctioning
- payment engine integration
To support this functionality, add:
- New RPC method, `amm_info`, to fetch pool and LPT balances
- AMM Root Account
- trust line for each IOU AMM token
- trust line to track Liquidity Provider Tokens (LPT)
- `ltAMM` object
The `ltAMM` object tracks:
- fee votes
- auction slot bids
- AMM tokens pair
- total outstanding tokens balance
- `AMMID` to AMM `RootAccountID` mapping
Add new classes to facilitate AMM integration into the payment engine.
`BookStep` uses these classes to infer if AMM liquidity can be consumed.
The AMM formula implementation uses the new Number class added in #4192.
IOUAmount and STAmount use Number arithmetic.
Add AMM unit tests for all features.
AMM requires the following amendments:
- featureAMM
- fixUniversalNumber
- featureFlowCross
Notes:
- Current trading fee threshold is 1%
- AMM currency is generated by: 0x03 + 152 bits of sha256{cur1, cur2}
- Current max AMM Offers is 30
---------
Co-authored-by: Howard Hinnant <howard.hinnant@gmail.com>
Improve error handling for ledger_entry by returning an "invalidParams"
error when one or more request fields are specified incorrectly, or one
or more required fields are missing.
For example, if none of of the following fields is provided, then the
API should return an invalidParams error:
* index, account_root, directory, offer, ripple_state, check, escrow,
payment_channel, deposit_preauth, ticket
Prior to this commit, the API returned an "unknownOption" error instead.
Since the error was actually due to invalid parameters, rather than
unknown options, this error was misleading.
Since this is an API breaking change, the "invalidParams" error is only
returned for requests using api_version: 2 and above. To maintain
backward compatibility, the "unknownOption" error is still returned for
api_version: 1.
Related: #4573Fix#4303
- Previously, mulDiv had `std::pair<bool, uint64_t>` as the output type.
- This is an error-prone interface as it is easy to ignore when
overflow occurs.
- Using a return type of `std::optional` should decrease the likelihood
of ignoring overflow.
- It also allows for the use of optional::value_or() as a way to
explicitly recover from overflow.
- Include limits.h header file preprocessing directive in order to
satisfy gcc's numeric_limits incomplete_type requirement.
Fix#3495
---------
Co-authored-by: John Freeman <jfreeman08@gmail.com>
* Update the `account_info` API so that the `allowClawback` flag is
included in the response.
* The proposed `Clawback` amendement added an `allowClawback` flag in
the `AccountRoot` object.
* In the API response, under `account_flags`, there is now an
`allowClawback` field with a boolean (`true` or `false`) value.
* For reference, the XLS-39 Clawback implementation can be found in
#4553Fix#4588
When requesting `account_info` with an invalid `signer_lists` value, the
API should return an "invalidParams" error.
`signer_lists` should have a value of type boolean. If it is not a
boolean, then it is invalid input. The response now indicates that.
* This is an API breaking change, so the change is only reflected for
requests containing `"api_version": 2`
* Fix#4539
- Use powers of two to clearly indicate the bitmask
- Replace bitmask with explicit if-conditions to better indicate predicates
Change enum values to be powers of two (fix#3417) #4239
Implement the simplified condition evaluation
removes the complex bitwise and(&) operator
Implement the second proposed solution in Nik Bougalis's comment - Software does not distinguish between different Conditions (Version: 1.5) #3417 (comment)
I have tested this code change by performing RPC calls with the commands server_info, server_state, peers and validation_info. These commands worked as expected.
Certain inputs for the AccountTx method should return an error. In other
words, an invalid request from a user or client now results in an error
message.
Since this can change the response from the API, it is an API breaking
change. This commit maintains backward compatibility by keeping the
existing behavior for existing requests. When clients specify
"api_version": 2, they will be able to get the updated error messages.
Update unit tests to check the error based on the API version.
* Fix#4288
* Fix#4545
* Commits 0b812cd (#4427) and 11e914f (#4516) conflict. The first added
references to `ServerHandlerImp` in files outside of that class's
organizational unit (which is technically incorrect). The second
removed `ServerHandlerImp`, but was not up to date with develop. This
results in the build failing.
* Fixes the build by changing references to `ServerHandlerImp` to
the more correct `ServerHandler`.
Rename `ServerHandlerImp` to `ServerHandler`. There was no other
ServerHandler definition despite the existence of a header suggesting
that there was.
This resolves a piece of historical confusion in the code, which was
identified during a code review.
The changes in the diff may look more extensive than they actually are.
The contents of `impl/ServerHandlerImp.h` were merged into
`ServerHandler.h`, making the latter file appear to have undergone
significant modifications. However, this is a non-breaking refactor that
only restructures code.
Replace hand-rolled code with std::from_chars for better
maintainability.
The C++ std::from_chars function is intended to be as fast as possible,
so it is unlikely to be slower than the code it replaces. This change is
a net gain because it reduces the amount of hand-rolled code.
Apply a minor cleanup in `TypedField`:
* Remove a non-working and unused move constructor.
* Constrain the remaining constructor to not be overly generic enough as
to be used as a copy or move constructor.
Enhance the /crawl endpoint by publishing WebSocket/RPC ports in the
server_info response. The function processing requests to the /crawl
endpoint actually calls server_info internally, so this change enables a
server to advertise its WebSocket/RPC port(s) to peers via the /crawl
endpoint. `grpc` and `peer` ports are included as well.
The new `ports` array contains objects, each containing a `port` for the
listening port (number string), and an array `protocol` listing the
supported protocol(s).
This allows crawlers to build a richer topology without needing to
port-scan nodes. For non-admin users (including peers), the info about
*admin* ports is excluded.
Also increase test coverage for RPC ServerInfo.
Fix#2837.
Curtail the occurrence of order books that are blocked by reduced offers
with the implementation of the fixReducedOffersV1 amendment.
This commit identifies three ways in which offers can be reduced:
1. A new offer can be partially crossed by existing offers, so the new
offer is reduced when placed in the ledger.
2. An in-ledger offer can be partially crossed by a new offer in a
transaction. So the in-ledger offer is reduced by the new offer.
3. An in-ledger offer may be under-funded. In this case the in-ledger
offer is scaled down to match the available funds.
Reduced offers can block order books if the effective quality of the
reduced offer is worse than the quality of the original offer (from the
perspective of the taker). It turns out that, for small values, the
quality of the reduced offer can be significantly affected by the
rounding mode used during scaling computations.
This commit adjusts some rounding modes so that the quality of a reduced
offer is always at least as good (from the taker's perspective) as the
original offer.
The amendment is titled fixReducedOffersV1 because additional ways of
producing reduced offers may come to light. Therefore, there may be a
future need for a V2 amendment.
* Enable api_version 2, which is currently in beta. It is expected to be
marked stable by the next stable release.
* This does not change any defaults.
* The only existing tests changed were one that set the same flag, which
was now redundant, and a couple that tested versioning explicitly.
