Partially revert the functionality introduced
with #4195 / 5a15229 (part of 1.10.0-b1).
Acknowledgements:
Aaron Hook for responsibly disclosing this issue.
Bug Bounties and Responsible Disclosures:
We welcome reviews of the rippled code and urge researchers to
responsibly disclose any issues they may find.
To report a bug, please send a detailed report to:
bugs@xrpl.org
---------
Co-authored-by: Nik Bougalis <nikb@bougalis.net>
- Copies the recipe for Snappy from Conan Center, but removes three
lines that explicitly link the standard library, which prevents
builders from statically linking it.
- Removes the recipe for RocksDB now that an official recipe for version
6.27.3 is in Conan Center.
Developers will likely need to remove cached versions of both RocksDB
and Snappy:
```
conan remove -f rocksdb
conan remove -f snappy
```
---------
Co-authored-by: John Freeman <jfreeman08@gmail.com>
* Set "fail-fast: false" so that multiple jobs in one workflow can
finish independently. By default, if one job fails, other running jobs
will be aborted, even if the other jobs are working fine and are
almost done. This leads to wasted time and resources if the failure
is, for example, OS specific, or due to a flaky unit test, and the
failed job needs to be re-run, because all the jobs end up re-running.
* Put conditions back into the windows.yml job (manual, and for
a specific branch name and that job). This prevents Github Actions
from sending "No jobs were run" failure emails on every commit.
Without this amendment, for NFTs using broker mode, if the sell offer contains a destination and that destination is the buyer account, anyone can broker the transaction. Also, if a buy offer contains a destination and that destination is the seller account, anyone can broker the transaction. This is not ideal and is misleading.
Instead, with this amendment: If you set a destination, that destination needs to be the account settling the transaction. So, the broker must be the destination if they want to settle. If the buyer is the destination, then the buyer must accept the sell offer, as you cannot broker your own offers.
If users want their offers open to the public, then they should not set a destination. On the other hand, if users want to limit who can settle the offers, then they would set a destination.
Unit tests:
1. The broker cannot broker a destination offer to the buyer and the buyer must accept the sell offer. (0 transfer)
2. If the broker is the destination, the broker will take the difference. (broker mode)
Fixes#4374
It was possible for a broker to combine a sell and a buy offer from an account that already owns an NFT. Such brokering extracts money from the NFT owner and provides no benefit in return.
With this amendment, the code detects when a broker is returning an NFToken to its initial owner and prohibits the transaction. This forbids a broker from selling an NFToken to the account that already owns the token. This fixes a bug in the original implementation of XLS-20.
Thanks to @nixer89 for suggesting this fix.
Fixes 3 issues:
In the following scenario, an account cannot perform NFTokenAcceptOffer even though it should be allowed to:
- BROKER has < S
- ALICE offers to sell token for S
- BOB offers to buy token for > S
- BROKER tries to bridge the two offers
This currently results in `tecINSUFFICIENT_FUNDS`, but should not because BROKER is not spending any funds in this transaction, beyond the transaction fee.
When trading an NFT using IOUs, and when the issuer of the IOU has any non-zero value set for TransferFee on their account via AccountSet (not a TransferFee on the NFT), and when the sale amount is equal to the total balance of that IOU that the buyer has, the resulting balance for the issuer of the IOU will become positive. This means that the buyer of the NFT was supposed to have caused a certain amount of IOU to be burned. That amount was unable to be burned because the buyer couldn't cover it. This results in the buyer owing this amount back to the issuer. In a real world scenario, this is appropriate and can be settled off-chain.
Currency issuers could not make offers for NFTs using their own currency, receiving `tecINSUFFICIENT_FUNDS` if they tried to do so.
With this fix, they are now able to buy/sell NFTs using their own currency.
