Files
rippled/nix/docker/README.md
Ayaz Salikhov 0364e4dc41 docs: Rewrite build environment docs (#7533)
Co-authored-by: Ed Hennis <ed@ripple.com>
2026-06-16 13:24:12 +00:00

91 lines
5.8 KiB
Markdown

# Nix CI Docker images
This directory builds the Docker images used by xrpld's Linux CI. Each image
bundles the **exact same toolchain that the Nix development shell provides**
(see [`docs/build/nix.md`](../../docs/build/nix.md)), so what runs in CI matches
what developers get locally from `nix develop`.
The toolchain (CMake, Ninja, Conan, GCC, Clang, clang-tidy, the
sanitizer/coverage tools, …) is defined in [`nix/packages.nix`](../packages.nix)
and assembled for CI by [`nix/ci-env.nix`](../ci-env.nix). The Docker build
turns that Nix environment into an ordinary container image layered on top of a
conventional base image (Ubuntu, Debian, RHEL, or `nixos/nix`).
## Images
The images are built by the [`build-nix-images.yml`](../../.github/workflows/build-nix-images.yml)
workflow and pushed to `ghcr.io/xrplf/xrpld/nix-<distro>`. The `<distro>` is
selected through the `BASE_IMAGE` build argument; the base images are the
**oldest supported version** of each distribution we target:
| Image | `BASE_IMAGE` | Notes |
| ------------ | -------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------- |
| `nix-nixos` | `nixos/nix:latest` | Build/lint only; binaries are not run (see below). |
| `nix-ubuntu` | `ubuntu:20.04` | Oldest supported Ubuntu (glibc 2.31). |
| `nix-debian` | `debian:bookworm` | |
| `nix-rhel` | `registry.access.redhat.com/ubi9/ubi:latest` | |
All images carry the full toolchain on `PATH` (via `/nix/ci-env/bin`) plus the
CA bundle shipped in the Nix environment, so HTTPS clients (git, curl, Conan)
work without `ca-certificates` being installed in the base image.
## Build stages
[`Dockerfile`](./Dockerfile) is a multi-stage build:
1. **`builder`** — On a `nixos/nix` builder, evaluate the flake and build the
CI environment (`nix/ci-env.nix`). The resulting Nix store closure (the
complete set of store paths the toolchain depends on) is copied into a
staging directory.
2. **`final`** — Start from `BASE_IMAGE`, copy in the Nix store closure and the
`ci-env` symlink tree, and wire up `PATH` and the CA bundle. It then:
- installs the dynamic linker if the base image lacks one (see
[How libc is handled](#how-libc-is-handled)),
- runs [`bin/check-tools.sh`](../../bin/check-tools.sh) to verify every
expected tool is present and runnable, and
- compiles the C++ test programs in
[`test_files/`](./test_files) with both `g++` and `clang++`, and sanitizers.
3. **`tester`** — Start again from a clean `BASE_IMAGE` (no Nix toolchain),
install only the sanitizer runtime libraries
([`install-sanitizer-libs.sh`](./install-sanitizer-libs.sh)), and run the
binaries compiled in `final`. This proves the binaries built with the Nix
toolchain actually run on a vanilla base image. On `nixos/nix` this step is
skipped (the binaries are patched for a conventional FHS loader).
4. **Output** — The final image is gated on the tester succeeding: it copies a
sentinel file out of `tester`, so a failed test run fails the whole build.
## How libc is handled
The goal is for binaries built in these images to run on the **oldest supported
base image** (Ubuntu 20.04, glibc 2.31) and newer — without the developer's Nix
toolchain being present at runtime. Two pieces make that work:
- **Compilers linked against an old glibc.** The Nix CI environment does not use
nixpkgs' current glibc. Instead it pins a 2020 nixpkgs snapshot whose primary
glibc is **2.31** (matching Ubuntu 20.04), via the `nixpkgs-custom-glibc`
flake input. GCC, Clang, binutils and compiler-rt are all rebuilt/wrapped
against this custom glibc (see [`nix/ci-env.nix`](../ci-env.nix)). As a result
the libraries they emit (`libstdc++`, `libgcc_s`, the sanitizer runtimes)
reference only symbols available in glibc 2.31.
- **An expected dynamic linker in the image.**
Binaries built in Nix environments reference a dynamic linker from Nix store paths, which won't be present in the base image. However,
[`loader-path.sh`](./loader-path.sh) reports the expected loader path for the
current architecture, so we can patch the binaries to use the correct loader.
The build then verifies all of this end to end: the test programs in
`test_files/` (a regular binary plus ASan/TSan/UBSan variants) are compiled in
`final`, their `PT_INTERP` is patched to the target loader, and they are run in
the clean `tester` stage to confirm each emits the expected sanitizer
diagnostic on a stock base image.
## Files
| File | Purpose |
| ----------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| [`./Dockerfile`](./Dockerfile) | Multi-stage build described above. |
| [`./loader-path.sh`](./loader-path.sh) | Print the dynamic-linker (`PT_INTERP`) path for the current architecture. |
| [`./test_files/`](./test_files) | C++ sources and scripts to compile and run the sanitizer smoke tests. |
| [`/bin/check-tools.sh`](../../bin/check-tools.sh) | Verify every expected tools are present and runnable. |
| [`/bin/install-sanitizer-libs.sh`](../../bin/install-sanitizer-libs.sh) | Install `libasan`/`libtsan`/`libubsan` runtimes on the supported base images. |