The harness manifests asserted things the code cannot produce and missed most of what it does. Two assertions were failing every run, and the metric set covered 16 of the ~41 emitted names. expected_spans.json: rpc.process was required with rpc.ws_message as its parent, but it is created only in ServerHandler::processRequest() on the HTTP path, so a WebSocket-only workload never produces it -- it is now optional and parented to rpc.http_request, and the rpc.process -> rpc.command.* edge is skipped with the real reason instead of a coroutine-context-loss diagnosis that was never the cause. Adds the missing rpc.ws_upgrade span, corrects four parents (consensus.mode_change, pathfind.request, and update_positions/check, which are children of consensus.establish rather than consensus.round), and demotes conditionally-set attributes out of required_attributes so a healthy run stops failing. Counts recomputed from the file: 41 span types, 62 unique required attributes. expected_metrics.json: 16 -> 52 asserted entries across the job-queue, RPC method, reduce-relay, overflow and validation families, plus the fifteenth dashboard uid. Metrics the harness workload cannot exercise -- erroring RPC, ledger-mismatch, TxQ overflow, and the lazily-created getobject_* instruments -- are listed in a not_asserted group the validator skips, rather than as assertions that would fail on a healthy node. The workflow's push trigger listed two globs matching nothing (include/xrpl/basics/Telemetry*.h, src/xrpld/app/misc/Telemetry*), so no C++ telemetry change ever triggered validation. Replaced with the paths the code actually lives in, including src/libxrpl/beast/insight/** for the insight export path the harness depends on. The four inert workflow_dispatch inputs are now labelled UNUSED rather than looking like working knobs. Docs: the workload README described a StatsD dirty-flag mechanism under a member name that does not exist, on a code path the harness never uses -- it sets [insight] server=otel, so gauges export through an observable-gauge callback every cycle. Adds the missing txq-burst phase, reconciles three different dashboard counts, and drops "posts summary to PR", which the workflow has no permission to do. The runbook's phase-10 section loses the last sampling_ratio reference (not a config key), gains a Regression Gate and CI subsection covering the gate that can fail CI, and its compose-logs command now names the workload compose file. cmake --preset default is left for a separate change: no CMakePresets.json is tracked, so it is wrong everywhere it appears. Also drops the dead exporter=otlp_http key the harness wrote into every node config, and stops capture_timings.py defaulting --profile to a profile that does not exist.
5.1 KiB
Performance Baselines
This directory holds the committed baseline file used by the OTel-driven regression gate.
How the gate works
After the validation suite runs, capture_timings.py queries Prometheus for the timings
declared in ../regression-metrics.json and writes a
timings.json. Then compare_to_baseline.py reads baseline-timings.json,
../regression-thresholds.json, and the captured
timings.json. The comparator picks one of two modes automatically:
- Placeholder baseline (
"placeholder": trueor emptymetrics): the comparator prints the captured timings JSON in exactly the format expected for this file, then exits 0 without gating. This is how we bootstrap the baseline. - Populated baseline: the comparator diffs per-metric, enforces the thresholds (regression = current exceeds baseline on BOTH the percentage AND absolute bound), and exits non-zero on any regression.
The regression gate runs against whatever workload profile run-full-validation.sh
was invoked with. Capture and comparison are profile-agnostic — they only read
Prometheus — so all existing profiles (full-validation, quick-smoke, stress)
continue to work unchanged.
Bootstrapping the baseline
- Merge a CI run with a
"placeholder": truebaseline. The telemetry-validation workflow runs, fails no gate, and prints the captured timings block to the workflow Step Summary under the heading### Paste into baselines/baseline-timings.json. - Open a new PR. Copy the full JSON block from the Step Summary (or download the
timings.jsonartifact) into this file, replacing the placeholder contents. The JSON is emitted in the exact byte-for-byte format this file expects — sorted keys, 2-space indent, trailing newline. - The committed baseline PR needs reviewer approval just like any other code change. This is the primary audit point for "who moved the performance bar."
Refreshing the baseline
Refresh when a legitimate performance change lands on develop (for example, a
deliberate rewrite that changes a span's structure). The process is identical to
bootstrapping: run CI with the current baseline, inspect the delta, and if the
new numbers should become the norm, open a PR pasting the fresh timings into
baseline-timings.json. The reviewer decides whether the new baseline is acceptable.
Do not edit baseline-timings.json by hand outside of this process — every entry
should trace back to a real CI run so variance characteristics are preserved.
Schema
{
"schema_version": 1,
"captured_at": "2026-04-24T17:30:00Z",
"window": "3m",
"git_sha": "<SHA of the commit that produced these numbers>",
"profile": "<workload profile used>",
"metrics": {
"span.tx.process.p99": { "value": 12.4, "unit": "ms" },
"job.transaction.queued.p95": { "value": 1500.0, "unit": "us" }
}
}
Keys follow {category}.{name}.p{quantile}. Only two categories are actually
produced today — span.* and job.* — because build_query_plan() in
prom_queries.py reads the spans and job_queue groups of
regression-metrics.json, and that file defines only those two.
Placeholder baselines additionally include "placeholder": true. The comparator
detects this field (or an empty metrics object) to switch into "populate" mode
instead of enforcing thresholds. Remove the placeholder key when pasting real
captured timings.
Missing metrics (value null) in a captured run do not count as regressions. In
regression-report.json, summary.missing_in_current is a count only; the
identities are in the metrics[] array, as the entries whose note is
"not captured in current run". Filter for those to see which keys went missing:
jq -r '.metrics[] | select(.note == "not captured in current run") | .key' \
/tmp/xrpld-validation/reports/regression-report.json
This keeps the gate robust when a profile doesn't exercise every span on every run.
Known gap: no rpc.* metric can gate (FU-4)
Per-RPC-method timings are not gated, and would not gate even if they were captured. Two independent blockers:
- Nothing emits an
rpc.*key.build_query_plan()inprom_queries.pybuildsrpc.*entries fromcfg.get("rpc_methods", {}), andregression-metrics.jsonhas norpc_methodsblock — so the group resolves to empty and norpc.*key ever reachestimings.jsonor this baseline. - Even a captured
rpc.*key would silently not gate.resolve_thresholds()incompare_to_baseline.pymaps therpccategory to the threshold grouprpc_method, butregression-thresholds.jsondefines onlydefaults.spananddefaults.job_queue. With norpc_methodblock the lookup returns(None, None), which the comparator treats as "no threshold configured" — the metric is reported but can never fail the build.
Closing this needs both an rpc_methods group in regression-metrics.json
and a defaults.rpc_method block in regression-thresholds.json. Adding only
the first produces metrics that look gated in the report but are not.