Re-trigger CI (flaky Book/Subscribe tests)

Defense-in-depth against a GCC 14 bug where reference captures in
coroutine lambdas are corrupted in the coroutine frame. The root
cause is fixed in CoroTaskRunner::init() (heap storage), but using
explicit pointer captures avoids any residual risk.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

src/test/core/Coroutine_test.cpp

@@ -40,6 +40,11 @@ public:
         }
     };
 
+    // NOTE: All coroutine lambdas passed to postCoroTask use explicit
+    // pointer-by-value captures instead of [&] to work around a GCC 14
+    // bug where reference captures in coroutine lambdas are corrupted
+    // in the coroutine frame.
+
     void
     correct_order()
     {
@@ -54,13 +59,15 @@ public:
         }));
 
         gate g1, g2;
-        std::shared_ptr<JobQueue::Coro> c;
-        env.app().getJobQueue().postCoro(jtCLIENT, "CoroTest", [&](auto const& cr) {
-            c = cr;
-            g1.signal();
-            c->yield();
-            g2.signal();
-        });
+        std::shared_ptr<JobQueue::CoroTaskRunner> c;
+        env.app().getJobQueue().postCoroTask(
+            jtCLIENT, "CoroTest", [cp = &c, g1p = &g1, g2p = &g2](auto runner) -> CoroTask<void> {
+                *cp = runner;
+                g1p->signal();
+                co_await runner->suspend();
+                g2p->signal();
+                co_return;
+            });
         BEAST_EXPECT(g1.wait_for(5s));
         c->join();
         c->post();
@@ -81,11 +88,17 @@ public:
         }));
 
         gate g;
-        env.app().getJobQueue().postCoro(jtCLIENT, "CoroTest", [&](auto const& c) {
-            c->post();
-            c->yield();
-            g.signal();
-        });
+        env.app().getJobQueue().postCoroTask(
+            jtCLIENT, "CoroTest", [gp = &g](auto runner) -> CoroTask<void> {
+                // Schedule a resume before suspending.  The posted job
+                // cannot actually call resume() until the current resume()
+                // releases CoroTaskRunner::mutex_, which only happens after
+                // the coroutine suspends at co_await.
+                runner->post();
+                co_await runner->suspend();
+                gp->signal();
+                co_return;
+            });
         BEAST_EXPECT(g.wait_for(5s));
     }
 
@@ -101,7 +114,7 @@ public:
         auto& jq = env.app().getJobQueue();
 
         static int const N = 4;
-        std::array<std::shared_ptr<JobQueue::Coro>, N> a;
+        std::array<std::shared_ptr<JobQueue::CoroTaskRunner>, N> a;
 
         LocalValue<int> lv(-1);
         BEAST_EXPECT(*lv == -1);
@@ -118,19 +131,23 @@ public:
 
         for (int i = 0; i < N; ++i)
         {
-            jq.postCoro(jtCLIENT, "CoroTest", [&, id = i](auto const& c) {
-                a[id] = c;
-                g.signal();
-                c->yield();
+            jq.postCoroTask(
+                jtCLIENT,
+                "CoroTest",
+                [this, ap = &a, gp = &g, lvp = &lv, id = i](auto runner) -> CoroTask<void> {
+                    (*ap)[id] = runner;
+                    gp->signal();
+                    co_await runner->suspend();
 
-                this->BEAST_EXPECT(*lv == -1);
-                *lv = id;
-                this->BEAST_EXPECT(*lv == id);
-                g.signal();
-                c->yield();
+                    this->BEAST_EXPECT(**lvp == -1);
+                    **lvp = id;
+                    this->BEAST_EXPECT(**lvp == id);
+                    gp->signal();
+                    co_await runner->suspend();
 
-                this->BEAST_EXPECT(*lv == id);
-            });
+                    this->BEAST_EXPECT(**lvp == id);
+                    co_return;
+                });
             BEAST_EXPECT(g.wait_for(5s));
             a[i]->join();
         }

src/test/core/JobQueue_test.cpp

@@ -43,87 +43,91 @@ class JobQueue_test : public beast::unit_test::suite
         }
     }
 
+    // NOTE: All coroutine lambdas passed to postCoroTask use explicit
+    // pointer-by-value captures instead of [&] to work around a GCC 14
+    // bug where reference captures in coroutine lambdas are corrupted
+    // in the coroutine frame.
+
     void
-    testPostCoro()
+    testPostCoroTask()
     {
         jtx::Env env{*this};
 
         JobQueue& jQueue = env.app().getJobQueue();
         {
-            // Test repeated post()s until the Coro completes.
+            // Test repeated post()s until the coroutine completes.
             std::atomic<int> yieldCount{0};
-            auto const coro = jQueue.postCoro(
-                jtCLIENT,
-                "PostCoroTest1",
-                [&yieldCount](std::shared_ptr<JobQueue::Coro> const& coroCopy) {
-                    while (++yieldCount < 4)
-                        coroCopy->yield();
+            auto const runner = jQueue.postCoroTask(
+                jtCLIENT, "PostCoroTest1", [ycp = &yieldCount](auto runner) -> CoroTask<void> {
+                    while (++(*ycp) < 4)
+                        co_await runner->suspend();
+                    co_return;
                 });
-            BEAST_EXPECT(coro != nullptr);
+            BEAST_EXPECT(runner != nullptr);
 
             // Wait for the Job to run and yield.
             while (yieldCount == 0)
                 ;
 
-            // Now re-post until the Coro says it is done.
+            // Now re-post until the CoroTaskRunner says it is done.
             int old = yieldCount;
-            while (coro->runnable())
+            while (runner->runnable())
             {
-                BEAST_EXPECT(coro->post());
+                BEAST_EXPECT(runner->post());
                 while (old == yieldCount)
                 {
                 }
-                coro->join();
+                runner->join();
                 BEAST_EXPECT(++old == yieldCount);
             }
             BEAST_EXPECT(yieldCount == 4);
         }
         {
-            // Test repeated resume()s until the Coro completes.
+            // Test repeated resume()s until the coroutine completes.
             int yieldCount{0};
-            auto const coro = jQueue.postCoro(
-                jtCLIENT,
-                "PostCoroTest2",
-                [&yieldCount](std::shared_ptr<JobQueue::Coro> const& coroCopy) {
-                    while (++yieldCount < 4)
-                        coroCopy->yield();
+            auto const runner = jQueue.postCoroTask(
+                jtCLIENT, "PostCoroTest2", [ycp = &yieldCount](auto runner) -> CoroTask<void> {
+                    while (++(*ycp) < 4)
+                        co_await runner->suspend();
+                    co_return;
                 });
-            if (!coro)
+            if (!runner)
             {
-                // There's no good reason we should not get a Coro, but we
+                // There's no good reason we should not get a runner, but we
                 // can't continue without one.
                 BEAST_EXPECT(false);
                 return;
             }
 
             // Wait for the Job to run and yield.
-            coro->join();
+            runner->join();
 
-            // Now resume until the Coro says it is done.
+            // Now resume until the CoroTaskRunner says it is done.
             int old = yieldCount;
-            while (coro->runnable())
+            while (runner->runnable())
             {
-                coro->resume();  // Resume runs synchronously on this thread.
+                runner->resume();  // Resume runs synchronously on this thread.
                 BEAST_EXPECT(++old == yieldCount);
             }
             BEAST_EXPECT(yieldCount == 4);
         }
         {
             // If the JobQueue is stopped, we should no
-            // longer be able to add a Coro (and calling postCoro() should
-            // return false).
+            // longer be able to post a coroutine (and calling postCoroTask()
+            // should return nullptr).
             using namespace std::chrono_literals;
             jQueue.stop();
 
-            // The Coro should never run, so having the Coro access this
+            // The coroutine should never run, so having it access this
             // unprotected variable on the stack should be completely safe.
             // Not recommended for the faint of heart...
             bool unprotected;
-            auto const coro = jQueue.postCoro(
-                jtCLIENT, "PostCoroTest3", [&unprotected](std::shared_ptr<JobQueue::Coro> const&) {
-                    unprotected = false;
+            auto const runner = jQueue.postCoroTask(
+                jtCLIENT, "PostCoroTest3", [up = &unprotected](auto) -> CoroTask<void> {
+                    *up = false;
+                    co_return;
                 });
-            BEAST_EXPECT(coro == nullptr);
+            BEAST_EXPECT(runner == nullptr);
         }
     }
 
@@ -132,7 +136,7 @@ public:
     run() override
     {
         testAddJob();
-        testPostCoro();
+        testPostCoroTask();
     }
 };