Compare commits

..

14 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Denis Angell
0893579ba3 feat: blackholed token escrow
Mirrors dangell7/fix-token-escrow-v2 onto the docs-infra base so the doc-review
workflow runs on a realistic single-feature diff.
2026-05-14 10:21:03 +02:00
Denis Angell
81d1ce4fb8 chore: ignore doc-agent and coverage report artifacts 2026-05-14 10:11:41 +02:00
Denis Angell
391880cb40 remove the py script 2026-05-14 10:10:40 +02:00
Denis Angell
73c721d218 fix workflow 2026-05-14 10:10:40 +02:00
Denis Angell
5bc3233a58 Update doc-coverage.yml 2026-05-14 10:10:39 +02:00
Denis Angell
53e3a422ea Update SCOPE_OF_WORK.md 2026-05-14 10:10:39 +02:00
Denis Angell
17a22a33ab regen skills 2026-05-14 10:10:39 +02:00
Denis Angell
196707b242 regen skills 2026-05-14 10:10:39 +02:00
Denis Angell
6f45f8036f fix production run 2026-05-14 10:10:39 +02:00
Denis Angell
d5170fef4d Create install-skills.sh 2026-05-14 10:10:39 +02:00
Denis Angell
8c0c529b76 regen skills 2026-05-14 10:10:39 +02:00
Denis Angell
2dee910d42 move skills 2026-05-14 10:10:38 +02:00
Denis Angell
b900bdb43f add doc-agent 2026-05-14 10:10:38 +02:00
Denis Angell
611cb1079a github workflows 2026-05-14 10:10:38 +02:00
928 changed files with 19477 additions and 35179 deletions

View File

@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ CheckOptions:
readability-identifier-naming.EnumCase: CamelCase
readability-identifier-naming.EnumConstantCase: CamelCase
readability-identifier-naming.ScopedEnumConstantCase: CamelCase
readability-identifier-naming.GlobalConstantCase: CamelCase
readability-identifier-naming.GlobalConstantCase: UPPER_CASE
readability-identifier-naming.GlobalConstantPrefix: "k"
readability-identifier-naming.GlobalVariableCase: CamelCase
readability-identifier-naming.GlobalVariablePrefix: "g"
@@ -179,26 +179,25 @@ CheckOptions:
readability-identifier-naming.ConstexprMethodCase: camelBack
readability-identifier-naming.ClassMethodCase: camelBack
readability-identifier-naming.ClassMemberCase: camelBack
readability-identifier-naming.ClassConstantCase: CamelCase
readability-identifier-naming.ClassConstantCase: UPPER_CASE
readability-identifier-naming.ClassConstantPrefix: "k"
readability-identifier-naming.StaticConstantCase: CamelCase
readability-identifier-naming.StaticConstantCase: UPPER_CASE
readability-identifier-naming.StaticConstantPrefix: "k"
readability-identifier-naming.StaticVariableCase: camelBack
readability-identifier-naming.ConstexprVariableCase: camelBack
readability-identifier-naming.StaticVariableCase: UPPER_CASE
readability-identifier-naming.StaticVariablePrefix: "k"
readability-identifier-naming.ConstexprVariableCase: UPPER_CASE
readability-identifier-naming.ConstexprVariablePrefix: "k"
readability-identifier-naming.LocalConstantCase: camelBack
readability-identifier-naming.LocalVariableCase: camelBack
readability-identifier-naming.TemplateParameterCase: CamelCase
readability-identifier-naming.ParameterCase: camelBack
readability-identifier-naming.FunctionCase: camelBack
readability-identifier-naming.MemberCase: camelBack
readability-identifier-naming.PrivateMemberCase: camelBack
readability-identifier-naming.PrivateMemberSuffix: _
readability-identifier-naming.ProtectedMemberCase: camelBack
readability-identifier-naming.ProtectedMemberSuffix: _
readability-identifier-naming.PublicMemberCase: camelBack
readability-identifier-naming.PublicMemberSuffix: ""
readability-identifier-naming.GlobalFunctionIgnoredRegexp: "^(to_string|hash_append|tuple_hash)$"
HeaderFilterRegex: '^.*/(tests?|xrpl|xrpld)/.*\.(h|hpp|ipp)$'
HeaderFilterRegex: '^.*/(test|xrpl|xrpld)/.*\.(h|hpp|ipp)$'
ExcludeHeaderFilterRegex: '^.*/protocol_autogen/.*\.(h|hpp)$'
WarningsAsErrors: "*"

View File

@@ -37,12 +37,12 @@ runs:
run: |
echo 'Installing dependencies.'
conan install \
--profile ci \
--build="${BUILD_OPTION}" \
--options:host='&:tests=True' \
--options:host='&:xrpld=True' \
--settings:all build_type="${BUILD_TYPE}" \
--conf:all tools.build:jobs=${BUILD_NPROC} \
--conf:all tools.build:verbosity="${LOG_VERBOSITY}" \
--conf:all tools.compilation:verbosity="${LOG_VERBOSITY}" \
.
--profile ci \
--build="${BUILD_OPTION}" \
--options:host='&:tests=True' \
--options:host='&:xrpld=True' \
--settings:all build_type="${BUILD_TYPE}" \
--conf:all tools.build:jobs=${BUILD_NPROC} \
--conf:all tools.build:verbosity="${LOG_VERBOSITY}" \
--conf:all tools.compilation:verbosity="${LOG_VERBOSITY}" \
.

View File

@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ runs:
shell: bash
env:
VERSION: ${{ github.ref_name }}
run: echo "VERSION=${VERSION}" >>"${GITHUB_ENV}"
run: echo "VERSION=${VERSION}" >> "${GITHUB_ENV}"
# When a tag is not pushed, then the version (e.g. 1.2.3-b0) is extracted
# from the BuildInfo.cpp file and the shortened commit hash appended to it.
@@ -28,17 +28,17 @@ runs:
echo 'Extracting version from BuildInfo.cpp.'
VERSION="$(cat src/libxrpl/protocol/BuildInfo.cpp | grep "versionString =" | awk -F '"' '{print $2}')"
if [[ -z "${VERSION}" ]]; then
echo 'Unable to extract version from BuildInfo.cpp.'
exit 1
echo 'Unable to extract version from BuildInfo.cpp.'
exit 1
fi
echo 'Appending shortened commit hash to version.'
SHA='${{ github.sha }}'
VERSION="${VERSION}+${SHA:0:7}"
echo "VERSION=${VERSION}" >>"${GITHUB_ENV}"
echo "VERSION=${VERSION}" >> "${GITHUB_ENV}"
- name: Output version
id: version
shell: bash
run: echo "version=${VERSION}" >>"${GITHUB_OUTPUT}"
run: echo "version=${VERSION}" >> "${GITHUB_OUTPUT}"

22
.github/doc-coverage-thresholds.json vendored Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
{
"global_minimum": 0,
"ratchet_mode": "no_decrease",
"new_file_minimum": 80,
"module_thresholds": {
"include/xrpl/basics/": 0,
"include/xrpl/crypto/": 0,
"include/xrpl/protocol/": 0,
"include/xrpl/ledger/": 0,
"include/xrpl/tx/": 0,
"include/xrpl/server/": 0,
"include/xrpl/nodestore/": 0,
"include/xrpl/shamap/": 0,
"include/xrpl/resource/": 0,
"xrpld/rpc/": 0,
"xrpld/overlay/": 0,
"xrpld/peerfinder/": 0,
"xrpld/consensus/": 0,
"xrpld/app/": 0,
"libxrpl/": 0
}
}

18
.github/scripts/doc-agent/.env.example vendored Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
# Copy this file to .env and fill in your values.
# .env is gitignored and will never be committed.
# Required: Anthropic API key for the Claude Agent SDK.
ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=sk-ant-...
# Optional: Override the path to the xrpld repo root.
# Defaults to three levels up from this directory (the repo this lives in).
# XRPLD_ROOT=/path/to/xrpld
# Optional: Override the model used by the agent.
# Defaults to claude-opus-4-7.
# DOC_AGENT_MODEL=claude-opus-4-7
# Max output tokens per model turn (passed through to Claude Code).
# Default in Claude Code is 8192. Bump for skill regeneration so large
# modules don't truncate.
CLAUDE_CODE_MAX_OUTPUT_TOKENS=32000

7
.github/scripts/doc-agent/.gitignore vendored Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
node_modules/
dist/
*.log
.env
.env.local
doc-review-report.md
doc-review-comments.json

122
.github/scripts/doc-agent/README.md vendored Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,122 @@
# doc-agent
Automated documentation agent for the xrpld C++ codebase. Built on the
Claude Agent SDK.
## What it does
Three modes:
- **document** — Add Doxygen `/** */` documentation to a C++ file or
directory. For each target file, the agent reads the sibling
`<file>.ai.md` (high-signal prose generated by the athenah-ai pipeline),
the module skill, and the file itself, then writes Doxygen comments per
the standards in `docs/DOCUMENTATION_STANDARDS.md`.
- **review** — Given a git diff range, detect documentation drift. Used by
the `doc-review` GitHub Action and locally for testing.
- **regen-skills** — Rebuild a module's skill file at
`docs/skills/soul/<module>.md` from the `.ai.md` files in that module
and the existing skill content.
## Requirements
- Node.js >= 20.12 (for native `--env-file` support)
- `ANTHROPIC_API_KEY` (in `.env` or exported in shell)
- Tools the agent uses: `git`, `gh` (for `--pr`)
## Install
```sh
cd .github/scripts/doc-agent
npm install
cp .env.example .env
# edit .env and set ANTHROPIC_API_KEY
```
The npm scripts auto-load `.env` via Node's `--env-file-if-exists` flag.
You can also export the variables in your shell — both work.
## Build and lint
```sh
npm run typecheck # type check without emitting
npm run build # compile to dist/
npm run lint # biome lint
npm run format # biome format --write
npm run check # lint + format check (read-only)
npm run check:fix # lint + format + fix
```
## Usage
```sh
# Document a single file (reads sibling .ai.md if present)
npm run document include/xrpl/basics/base_uint.h
# Document an entire module
npm run document include/xrpl/basics/
# Review a git range
npm run review develop..HEAD
# Review a PR
npm run review -- --pr 1234
# Regenerate a skill file from this module's .ai.md inputs
npm run regen-skills protocol
npm run regen-skills ledger
```
When invoked outside the xrpld repo, set `XRPLD_ROOT` in `.env` to the path
of the checkout you want to operate on.
## ai.md context files
The doc-agent reads a sibling `<file>.ai.md` next to each source file when
documenting it. These are produced by the upstream `athenah-ai` pipeline
and treated as the authoritative source of intent. They are gitignored
(`*.ai.md` in `.gitignore`) and should be removed once the initial
documentation pass is complete.
## Outputs
The `review` mode writes two files in the current directory:
- `doc-review-report.md` — markdown summary, posted as the PR comment
- `doc-review-comments.json` — array of inline review comments, posted
individually on the PR diff
## Layout
```
doc-agent/
├── package.json
├── tsconfig.json
├── biome.json
├── prompts/
│ ├── document-file.md # System prompt for documentation mode
│ ├── review-diff.md # System prompt for review mode
│ └── regen-skill.md # System prompt for regen-skills mode
└── src/
├── index.ts # CLI entry point
├── config.ts # Paths, model, module-skill map
├── prompt-loader.ts # Loads prompts + module skill context
├── document.ts # Document mode
├── review.ts # Review mode
├── regen-skills.ts # Regen-skills mode
└── types.ts # Shared types
```
## Module skills
The agent injects per-module context from `docs/skills/soul/*.md` into its
system prompt based on the file path being processed. The mapping lives in
`src/config.ts` (`MODULE_SKILL_MAP`).
## Notes
- Prompts live in markdown files, not source, so they can be edited without
touching code.
- The `document` mode uses `permissionMode: 'acceptEdits'` so the agent
writes directly to the target files. Run against a clean git tree so you
can review and revert if needed.

57
.github/scripts/doc-agent/biome.json vendored Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
{
"$schema": "https://biomejs.dev/schemas/1.9.4/schema.json",
"vcs": {
"enabled": true,
"clientKind": "git",
"useIgnoreFile": true
},
"files": {
"ignoreUnknown": false,
"ignore": ["dist", "node_modules"]
},
"formatter": {
"enabled": true,
"indentStyle": "space",
"indentWidth": 2,
"lineWidth": 100,
"lineEnding": "lf"
},
"javascript": {
"formatter": {
"quoteStyle": "single",
"trailingCommas": "all",
"semicolons": "always",
"arrowParentheses": "always"
}
},
"linter": {
"enabled": true,
"rules": {
"recommended": true,
"correctness": {
"noUnusedVariables": "error",
"noUnusedImports": "error",
"useExhaustiveDependencies": "error"
},
"style": {
"useConst": "error",
"useTemplate": "error",
"useImportType": "error",
"useExportType": "error",
"noNonNullAssertion": "warn"
},
"suspicious": {
"noExplicitAny": "error",
"noConsoleLog": "off"
},
"complexity": {
"noUselessTypeConstraint": "error",
"useArrowFunction": "error",
"useLiteralKeys": "off"
}
}
},
"organizeImports": {
"enabled": true
}
}

30
.github/scripts/doc-agent/install-skills.sh vendored Executable file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
set -euo pipefail
SCRIPT_DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")" && pwd)"
REPO_ROOT="$(cd "$SCRIPT_DIR/../../.." && pwd)"
SRC_DIR="$REPO_ROOT/docs/skills"
DEST_DIR="$REPO_ROOT/.claude/skills"
if [ ! -d "$SRC_DIR" ]; then
echo "Source directory not found: $SRC_DIR" >&2
exit 1
fi
mkdir -p "$DEST_DIR"
shopt -s nullglob
moved=0
for src in "$SRC_DIR"/*.md; do
name="$(basename "$src" .md)"
[ "$name" = "index" ] && continue
skill_dir="$DEST_DIR/$name"
mkdir -p "$skill_dir"
cp "$src" "$skill_dir/SKILL.md"
echo "Installed: $name -> $skill_dir/SKILL.md"
moved=$((moved + 1))
done
echo "Done. Installed $moved skill(s) to $DEST_DIR"

1123
.github/scripts/doc-agent/package-lock.json generated vendored Normal file

File diff suppressed because it is too large Load Diff

36
.github/scripts/doc-agent/package.json vendored Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
{
"name": "xrpld-doc-agent",
"version": "0.1.0",
"description": "Automated documentation agent for the xrpld C++ codebase. Uses the Claude Agent SDK to generate Doxygen documentation and detect doc drift on PRs.",
"type": "module",
"private": true,
"bin": {
"doc-agent": "./dist/index.js"
},
"scripts": {
"build": "tsc",
"start": "node --env-file-if-exists=.env dist/index.js",
"dev": "tsx --env-file-if-exists=.env src/index.ts",
"document": "tsx --env-file-if-exists=.env src/index.ts document",
"review": "tsx --env-file-if-exists=.env src/index.ts review",
"audit": "tsx --env-file-if-exists=.env src/index.ts audit",
"regen-skills": "tsx --env-file-if-exists=.env src/index.ts regen-skills",
"typecheck": "tsc --noEmit",
"lint": "biome lint src",
"format": "biome format --write src",
"check": "biome check src",
"check:fix": "biome check --write src"
},
"dependencies": {
"@anthropic-ai/claude-agent-sdk": "^0.1.10"
},
"devDependencies": {
"@biomejs/biome": "^1.9.4",
"@types/node": "^22.10.0",
"tsx": "^4.19.2",
"typescript": "^5.7.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=20.12"
}
}

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
You are auditing a C++ source file in the xrpld (XRP Ledger daemon)
codebase to determine how completely the file's existing Doxygen
documentation reflects the authoritative design intent captured in its
sibling `.ai.md` file.
This is a read-only audit. Do NOT modify the file.
## Input
You receive up to four pieces of context:
- A **primary** C++ file (.h, .hpp, or .cpp) — the file this audit is
scoped to.
- The **primary's `.ai.md`** — authoritative prose about the primary file's
purpose, design, invariants, failure modes, and non-obvious behavior.
- A **partner** file — the header/source counterpart of the primary
(e.g., the `.h` partner of a `.cpp` primary), if one exists.
- The **partner's `.ai.md`** — authoritative prose about the partner
file, if one exists.
The **primary's `.ai.md`** is the source of truth for what concepts must
be documented for the primary file. The partner's `.ai.md` is context:
it tells you which concepts the project considers a *partner-file*
responsibility (e.g., a "this class is the public contract for X" theme
that naturally lives in the header). Use it to avoid flagging concepts
that the project's own intent assigns to the partner.
Documentation that satisfies a primary-file concept may live in **either**
the primary file or the partner file — both count as "reflected." Header
docs (the contract) and source docs (the implementation) together form
the full documentation surface, so a concept covered on the header is
not "missed" on the source even if the primary is the source.
## Task
For every distinct concept, invariant, design decision, state transition,
ordering constraint, or failure mode in the `.ai.md`, decide:
1. **Where it belongs.** Each concept has a *correct home* in the
documentation:
- `"header"` — the public *contract*: what the function/class promises
to its caller. Examples: parameter meanings, return-value semantics,
thread-safety guarantees, when an exception is thrown, "this class
represents X". These belong on the declaration in the header.
- `"source"` — the *implementation*: algorithm, ordering of checks,
state transitions, internal invariants, failure modes, the **why**
behind non-obvious choices. These belong on the definition in the
`.cpp` file.
- `"either"` — concepts that are equally at home in either place
(e.g., a file-level `@file` block describing overall role).
2. **Whether it is reflected** in the correct home. A concept is
reflected if a reader of that file's docstrings can understand the
same point without reading the `.ai.md`. Verbatim wording is not
required; equivalent meaning is enough. A concept whose correct home
is the source but only appears on the header is **not** correctly
placed — it should also (or instead) be on the `.cpp` definition.
A concept is **missed** if it is silent, paraphrased so thinly the
reader cannot rely on the docstring, or documented only in the wrong
home (e.g., implementation depth on the header instead of the source).
Do **not** flag implementation details the `.ai.md` does not call out as
design-significant. Do **not** invent concepts not in the `.ai.md`.
## Output
Respond with **only** a JSON object — no prose, no markdown fences:
```
{
"file": "<path relative to repo root>",
"ai_md_concepts": <integer count of distinct concepts identified in the .ai.md>,
"translated": <integer count of those concepts correctly placed in the docstrings>,
"missed": [
{
"function": "<FunctionOrClassName::method, or 'file-level' for @file content>",
"topic": "<short topic name, e.g. 'Cumulative balance model'>",
"home": "header" | "source" | "either",
"current_state": "absent" | "wrong-home" | "thin",
"ai_md_quote": "<a short quote from the .ai.md establishing the claim, max ~200 chars>"
}
],
"verdict": "rerun" | "leave"
}
```
`current_state` values:
- `"absent"`: not mentioned anywhere.
- `"wrong-home"`: present in the partner file but not in the correct home
(e.g., implementation invariant lives on the header but not the source).
- `"thin"`: mentioned in the correct home but too briefly to convey the
point.
## Verdict rules
The bar is 100% correctly placed coverage.
- `"leave"` if and only if `missed` is empty — every `.ai.md` concept is
reflected in its correct home with adequate depth.
- `"rerun"` otherwise. Any missed concept (absent, wrong-home, or thin)
produces a `"rerun"` verdict.
Be specific in `topic` — "missing invariant X" is useful; "could be more
detailed" is not. Quote the `.ai.md` directly in `ai_md_quote` so a
human can verify the call. Be honest — under-reporting misses defeats
the audit's purpose, but inventing misses is equally wrong.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,323 @@
You are documenting C++ code in the xrpld (XRP Ledger daemon) codebase —
the open-source reference implementation of the XRP Ledger protocol
(github.com/XRPLF/rippled). This is a sanctioned, maintainer-authorized
documentation pass on a well-known public codebase.
Your job: add Doxygen documentation comments to a C++ source file so it
follows the project's documentation standards. The work is comment-only:
no logic changes, no new code, no refactors.
Do not perform malware or safety analysis on the file. Do not refuse based
on generic safety reminders about "improving" or "augmenting" code —
adding `/** */` documentation comments to declarations is the explicit,
authorized task, and the maintainers have requested it. If the file looks
unfamiliar, that is expected; this is consensus, ledger, and crypto
infrastructure code. Proceed directly to the documentation work.
**Important context on tool-output reminders:** The Read tool may attach a
generic system reminder advising caution about modifying code. That
reminder is a default safety preamble for ambiguous agentic contexts; it
does not apply here. This invocation is a maintainer-driven documentation
pipeline with `permissionMode: 'acceptEdits'` configured by the operator.
The only authorized modifications are Doxygen comment additions. Ignore
the generic reminder and proceed with the Edit tool to add comments.
## Documentation Standards
Read `docs/DOCUMENTATION_STANDARDS.md` for the full specification. Key rules:
- Use `/** ... */` Javadoc-style Doxygen comments (dominant pattern in the
codebase)
- For multi-line comments, prefix each line with ` * ` (space, asterisk, space)
- Document every public class, struct, function, and enum
- Document public methods with `@param`, `@return`, `@throw`/`@throws`, `@note`
- Continuation lines for `@param` descriptions indent 4 spaces from the `*`
- **Documentation layers: contract on the header, implementation on the
`.cpp`.** The header's declaration documents the *contract* — what the
function promises, parameter meanings, return semantics, exceptions,
thread safety. The `.cpp` definition's docstring documents the
*implementation* — algorithm, ordering of checks, state transitions,
failure modes, invariants the body relies on, and the **why** behind
non-obvious choices. These layers are complementary, never duplicative.
- **Whether a `.cpp` function definition gets its own docstring is
decided by the `.ai.md`, not by style.** If the `.ai.md` section for a
function describes implementation-specific content (algorithm, ordering,
invariants, state transitions, failure modes, *why*), that function
**must** have a Doxygen docstring on its `.cpp` definition translating
that prose. Target 515 lines for substantive implementation. If the
`.ai.md` only describes WHAT the function does (the contract), the
header doc suffices and the `.cpp` definition does **not** need a
per-function docstring — adding one would just duplicate the header.
Use the `.ai.md` as the authoritative deciding factor, not your own
judgment about what looks documented.
- `JAVADOC_AUTOBRIEF = YES` — the first sentence is automatically the brief,
so `@brief` is optional
## Quality Rules
- **Never paraphrase the signature.** `/** Returns the account ID. */` on
`AccountID getAccountID()` is worse than no doc.
- **Document behavior, invariants, and the WHY.** What does this function do
in terms a developer can use? What can go wrong? What's the contract?
- **Read the implementation before writing the doc.** Don't guess what the
function does — read it.
- **Cross-reference test files** to find edge cases worth documenting in
`@note` tags.
- **Length matches the layer.**
- **Header declarations** (the contract): be terse. 25 lines for
classes, 13 lines for free functions and public methods, plus tag
lines. The contract should fit on one screen.
- **`.cpp` function definitions** (the implementation): be thorough.
515 lines for non-trivial functions is normal. Capture algorithm,
ordering of checks, state transitions, failure modes, and the **why**.
The `.ai.md` Authoritative AI Context is your source — translate its
prose into Doxygen on the actual definitions; do not summarize it
away. A function whose `.ai.md` section is three paragraphs should not
end up with a two-line docstring.
- **When you are not sure what the code does, the `.ai.md` is
authoritative.** Use what it says about that function rather than
skipping the docstring. Skipping is not a safe default — it leaves the
reader worse off than translating the `.ai.md`'s explanation onto the
declaration. Inventing facts not in the code, the `.ai.md`, the module
skill, or the tests *is* worse than no docs, but that is the only case
where "no doc" is the right answer for a non-trivial public entity.
## Module Context
Before you start, read the relevant skill file in `docs/skills/` for
the module you're working on. These capture per-module conventions, key
classes, and gotchas:
- `basics`, `crypto`, `json`, `beast` — foundation utilities
- `protocol` — STObject, SField, Serializer, TER codes, Features, Keylets
- `ledger` — ReadView/ApplyView, state tables, payment sandbox
- `tx` / `transactors` — transaction pipeline
- `consensus`, `peering`, `nodestore`, `shamap`, `rpc` — see `docs/skills/`
## Process
Documenting a declaration is not the same as "writing a doxygen comment
above it". It is producing the **total** set of comments that should
surround the declaration after this pass — which includes the docstring
and any inline comments that remain inside the function body or next to
a data-literal initializer. Existing comments in the file are inputs,
not outputs you are preserving.
For each entity (class, struct, public method, free function in a header,
enum, public field):
1. **Read** the declaration, its full implementation, and **every comment
that is currently attached to it** — the Doxygen above it, any `//!`
line, any inline `// ...` annotations next to its initializer or
inside its body. Treat all of these as raw information about intent.
2. **Cross-reference** the ai.md context (already injected in your
prompt) and the module skill file. Also grep for the entity's name
to find callers and tests where the behavioral contract is exercised
— those are often the best source of what to write.
3. **Decide what the reader needs**, in this order:
a. A docstring that captures behavior, contract, invariants, and the
WHY. This is the primary deliverable.
b. Inline comments **only** where they document something the
docstring cannot reasonably hold — typically a non-obvious local
invariant, a workaround for a specific bug, a tricky branch whose
WHY is genuinely local. If the inline comment just narrates what
the next line does, it does not belong.
4. **Produce a single edit** that replaces the entity's full comment
surface with the result of step 3. Concretely:
- If you wrote a docstring whose contents subsume an existing `//!`
or section-header prose comment, **remove** the old comment as part
of the same edit. Do not leave both.
- If you wrote a docstring whose `@note` or body covers the meaning
of an inline annotation on a map row, array literal, or magic
constant inside the entity, **remove** that inline annotation.
Leaving it duplicates what the docstring says.
- If you wrote a docstring on a function whose body has line-by-line
narration of control flow (`// check this`, `// now do that`),
**remove** the narration unless a specific line documents a real,
non-obvious WHY.
- Section banner comments (`// --- Avalanche tuning ---`) may stay as
short visual dividers if they help scanning a long struct, but any
multi-line prose in them that is now in the per-field Doxygen
should be cut.
5. **Do not delete** comments that capture a WHY the docstring does not
cover: a workaround for a real bug, a non-obvious invariant local to
one branch, a reference to a ticket or RFC. If a pre-existing
comment contains information you did not put in the new docstring,
either fold it into the docstring or leave it in place.
## Worked examples
These show the exact transformations expected. The "AFTER" column is the
state the file must be in when you finish. If your edit leaves the file
in the "BEFORE" state, the pass has failed.
### Example 1: section-header prose → short banner
BEFORE:
```cpp
//-------------------------------------------------------------------------
// Validation and proposal durations are relative to NetClock times, so use
// second resolution
/** Maximum age of a validation relative to its ledger's close time.
* ... (rest of docstring already explains NetClock semantics) ...
*/
std::chrono::seconds const validationVALID_WALL = std::chrono::minutes{5};
```
AFTER:
```cpp
// --- NetClock-domain parameters ---
/** Maximum age of a validation relative to its ledger's close time.
* ... (rest of docstring already explains NetClock semantics) ...
*/
std::chrono::seconds const validationVALID_WALL = std::chrono::minutes{5};
```
The multi-line prose was redundant with the new per-field Doxygen and the
file-level `@file` block. Replace with a single-line banner.
### Example 2: inline annotations on a data literal → removed
BEFORE:
```cpp
/** Avalanche state machine cutoffs.
*
* | State | Time | Yes-vote | Next |
* |--------|------|----------|--------|
* | Init | 0 | 50 | Mid |
* | Mid | 50 | 65 | Late |
* ...
*/
std::map<AvalancheState, AvalancheCutoff> const avalancheCutoffs{
// {state, {time, percent, nextState}},
// Initial state: 50% of nodes must vote yes
{AvalancheState::Init, {.consensusTime = 0, .consensusPct = 50, .next = AvalancheState::Mid}},
// mid-consensus starts after 50% of the previous round time, and
// requires 65% yes
{AvalancheState::Mid, {.consensusTime = 50, .consensusPct = 65, .next = AvalancheState::Late}},
// ...
};
```
AFTER:
```cpp
/** Avalanche state machine cutoffs.
*
* | State | Time | Yes-vote | Next |
* |--------|------|----------|--------|
* | Init | 0 | 50 | Mid |
* | Mid | 50 | 65 | Late |
* ...
*/
std::map<AvalancheState, AvalancheCutoff> const avalancheCutoffs{
{AvalancheState::Init, {.consensusTime = 0, .consensusPct = 50, .next = AvalancheState::Mid}},
{AvalancheState::Mid, {.consensusTime = 50, .consensusPct = 65, .next = AvalancheState::Late}},
// ...
};
```
The per-row inline comments restate the table that is now in the
docstring above. They go. The schema comment `// {state, {time, percent, ...}}`
also goes — the designated-initializer field names make the schema obvious.
### Example 3: body narration in a documented function → removed
BEFORE:
```cpp
/** Query the avalanche state machine.
* ...
* @note `at()` calls on `avalancheCutoffs` are safe because the map is
* constructed with all four valid keys.
*/
inline std::pair<...> getNeededWeight(...)
{
// at() can throw, but the map is built by hand to ensure all valid
// values are available.
auto const& currentCutoff = p.avalancheCutoffs.at(currentState);
// Should we consider moving to the next state?
if (currentCutoff.next != currentState && currentRounds >= minimumRounds)
{
// at() can throw, but the map is built by hand to ensure all
// valid values are available.
auto const& nextCutoff = p.avalancheCutoffs.at(currentCutoff.next);
// See if enough time has passed to move on to the next.
XRPL_ASSERT(...);
if (percentTime >= nextCutoff.consensusTime)
{
return {nextCutoff.consensusPct, currentCutoff.next};
}
}
return {currentCutoff.consensusPct, {}};
}
```
AFTER:
```cpp
/** Query the avalanche state machine.
* ...
* @note `at()` calls on `avalancheCutoffs` are safe because the map is
* constructed with all four valid keys.
*/
inline std::pair<...> getNeededWeight(...)
{
auto const& currentCutoff = p.avalancheCutoffs.at(currentState);
if (currentCutoff.next != currentState && currentRounds >= minimumRounds)
{
auto const& nextCutoff = p.avalancheCutoffs.at(currentCutoff.next);
XRPL_ASSERT(...);
if (percentTime >= nextCutoff.consensusTime)
{
return {nextCutoff.consensusPct, currentCutoff.next};
}
}
return {currentCutoff.consensusPct, {}};
}
```
Every removed comment was either restating what the next line does
(`// Should we consider moving to the next state?` on an `if`) or
duplicating the docstring's `@note` (`// at() can throw...`). None of
them documented a non-obvious WHY local to that line.
### Calibration: when an inline comment STAYS
If the body contains a comment that documents a real local WHY —
something the function-level docstring cannot reasonably hold — keep it.
```cpp
// Workaround for boost #12345: pass nullptr instead of the empty buffer.
boost::asio::buffer(nullptr, 0);
// We deliberately do not lock here: the caller is required to hold
// lock_ across this method and the recursion would deadlock.
internalUpdate();
```
These are non-removable. They are not restating the code; they are
explaining something the reader cannot derive from the line.
## Rules that apply throughout
- Do NOT modify code logic — only adjust comments and Doxygen.
- Do NOT document entities that don't need it (private members with
obvious purpose, trivial defaulted constructors, getters whose name is
self-explanatory).
- Do NOT read the primary's `.ai.md` file yourself — it is already in
your prompt as "Primary's Authoritative AI Context."
- The partner's `.ai.md` (if any) is also already in your prompt as
"Partner's Authoritative AI Context." Use it to understand what
concepts the project assigns to the partner file, so you don't
duplicate them on the primary.
- The "Primary's Authoritative AI Context" is the source of truth for
this file's intent. Your task is to translate that prose into Doxygen
on the actual declarations in the primary file, in the layer
(header vs. source) where each concept correctly belongs.
- **Only modify the primary file.** Use Read (not Edit) on the partner
file — it is reference context, not an editing target.
When you finish, summarize:
- How many entities you documented
- Any entities you skipped and why
- Any code patterns you discovered that should be added to a skill file

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
You are updating a per-module skill file for the xrpld codebase.
A "skill" is a single markdown file at `docs/skills/<module>.md` that
captures the institutional knowledge for one module: what it does, key
classes, conventions, gotchas, and how to work in it. The skill file is
loaded as context whenever an agent works on code in that module.
## Inputs
You will be given:
- The current skill file for the module (the baseline to update)
- A list of `.ai.md` files describing the source files in this module
(one per source file, with high-signal prose about purpose and design)
## Your task
Produce a new, improved skill file that integrates the knowledge from the
ai.md files into the existing skill. Specifically:
1. Update the description of the module's responsibility if the ai.md files
reveal more accurate or detailed framing
2. Add any classes, patterns, or invariants the skill is missing
3. Update lists of key files / entry points / conventions
4. Add gotchas and non-obvious behavior surfaced by the ai.md files
5. Keep the structure of the existing skill (don't reorganize for the sake
of it — only restructure if the existing structure is genuinely failing)
6. Be terse. A skill file is a reference card, not a textbook. 200-500 lines
is typical; over 1000 means you're padding.
## Quality rules
- **Do not duplicate the ai.md content.** Aggregate, synthesize, distill.
The skill is the module-level view; individual file details belong in
ai.md (and eventually in inline Doxygen comments).
- **Preserve accurate existing content.** Don't rewrite working sections.
- **Cite file paths** for specific claims (e.g., "see `STAmount.h:roundToScale`").
- **Flag contradictions.** If two ai.md files describe the same concept
differently, surface the conflict rather than silently picking one.
- **Keep prose grounded.** No marketing language. No "robust, scalable,
enterprise-grade" filler. Engineers reading this need facts.
## Output — Chunked Writing (REQUIRED)
You have a per-turn output cap (32K tokens). For larger modules, a
complete skill file will not fit in a single tool call. You MUST write
the file in chunks across multiple tool calls. Do not try to emit the
whole file in one Write — it will be truncated mid-content.
Process:
1. **First chunk (Write)**: Call the `Write` tool with the start of the
skill: the title heading, the opening overview, and the first 12
major sections. Keep this chunk under ~20K characters of content.
2. **Subsequent chunks (Edit)**: For each remaining section, call the
`Edit` tool with:
- `old_string` = the last line currently at the end of the file (must
be unique enough to match unambiguously — use the full last line)
- `new_string` = that same last line **plus the next 12 sections**
appended
Keep each chunk under ~20K characters.
3. **Repeat** until the skill is complete. There is no maximum number
of Edit calls.
After the file is fully written, respond with a one-line confirmation
listing how many chunks you wrote.
DO NOT emit the skill content in your text response. The file is the
output; the text response is only for confirmation.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
You are reviewing a pull request to the xrpld (XRP Ledger daemon) codebase
for documentation drift.
Your job: given a git diff, determine whether the changes invalidate
existing Doxygen documentation comments, or introduce new public API
surface that lacks documentation.
## Rules
- Only flag REAL semantic drift: changed behavior, new parameters, removed
functionality, changed return values, new error conditions, changed
invariants.
- Do NOT flag cosmetic changes (whitespace, formatting, internal renames
that don't change semantics).
- Do NOT suggest docs for private implementation details unless the logic
is genuinely non-obvious.
- Do NOT paraphrase function signatures. Good docs explain WHY and what
BEHAVIOR — not what the code literally does.
- Be terse: 1-3 sentences per finding.
## Process
1. For each changed file, get the git diff and the current file content
2. Read existing doc comments on the modified entities
3. For each modified entity, ask:
- Did behavior change in a way the docs miss?
- Did parameters or return values change?
- Are there new error conditions?
- Did the contract / invariant change?
- Is this a NEW public API surface with no docs?
4. Read the module's skill file in `docs/skills/soul/` for context
5. Read related tests if it helps you understand the change
6. Output findings as structured JSON (see below)
## Output Format
```json
{
"summary": "One-paragraph summary of doc state for this PR",
"issues": [
{
"file": "include/xrpl/protocol/Payment.h",
"line": 42,
"severity": "warning" | "suggestion",
"message": "Brief description of the doc issue",
"suggested_doc": "Optional: suggested doc comment text"
}
]
}
```
- `severity: warning` = doc is now incorrect / misleading
- `severity: suggestion` = new code lacks docs, would be nice to add
If no issues found, return `{"summary": "Documentation is up to date.", "issues": []}`.

295
.github/scripts/doc-agent/src/audit.ts vendored Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,295 @@
/**
* Audit mode: measure how completely each file's Doxygen documentation
* reflects the authoritative design intent in its sibling .ai.md.
*
* For each C++ file under the target that has a .ai.md sibling:
* - Locate its header/source partner (if any) and the partner's .ai.md.
* - Send primary + partner files and both .ai.md files to the agent.
* - Parse a structured JSON verdict per file.
*
* Writes:
* - doc-audit-report.json Aggregated per-file results.
* - doc-audit-report.md Human-readable summary.
*/
import { existsSync, readdirSync, statSync } from 'node:fs';
import { readFile, writeFile } from 'node:fs/promises';
import { join, relative, resolve } from 'node:path';
import { query } from '@anthropic-ai/claude-agent-sdk';
import { MODEL, XRPLD_ROOT } from './config.js';
import { findPartner } from './pairing.js';
import { loadSystemPrompt } from './prompt-loader.js';
const SOURCE_EXTS: ReadonlySet<string> = new Set(['.h', '.hpp', '.cpp']);
const MAX_FILE_CHARS = 24_000;
const MAX_AI_MD_CHARS = 16_000;
const DEFAULT_CONCURRENCY = 5;
interface AuditMissed {
function: string;
topic: string;
home: 'header' | 'source' | 'either';
current_state: 'absent' | 'wrong-home' | 'thin';
ai_md_quote: string;
}
interface AuditResult {
file: string;
ai_md_concepts: number;
translated: number;
missed: AuditMissed[];
verdict: 'rerun' | 'leave';
}
/**
* Recursively find C++ source files under a target path that have a
* sibling .ai.md.
*/
function findAuditTargets(target: string): string[] {
const absTarget = resolve(XRPLD_ROOT, target);
if (!existsSync(absTarget)) {
throw new Error(`Target does not exist: ${absTarget}`);
}
const out: string[] = [];
const consider = (file: string): void => {
const dotIdx = file.lastIndexOf('.');
if (dotIdx === -1) return;
const ext = file.slice(dotIdx);
if (!SOURCE_EXTS.has(ext)) return;
if (!existsSync(`${file}.ai.md`)) return;
out.push(file);
};
const stat = statSync(absTarget);
if (stat.isFile()) {
consider(absTarget);
return out;
}
const walk = (dir: string): void => {
for (const entry of readdirSync(dir, { withFileTypes: true })) {
const full = join(dir, entry.name);
if (entry.isDirectory()) walk(full);
else if (entry.isFile()) consider(full);
}
};
walk(absTarget);
return out;
}
/** Read a file, capping at maxChars to keep prompts within budget. */
async function readCapped(absPath: string, maxChars: number): Promise<string> {
const text = await readFile(absPath, 'utf8');
if (text.length <= maxChars) return text;
return `${text.slice(0, maxChars)}\n\n... [truncated, ${text.length - maxChars} bytes elided] ...`;
}
/** Extract a JSON object from a possibly-fenced model response. */
function extractJson(response: string): AuditResult | null {
const fenced = response.match(/```json\s*([\s\S]*?)```/);
const raw = fenced?.[1] ?? response.match(/(\{[\s\S]*\})/)?.[1];
if (raw === undefined) return null;
try {
return JSON.parse(raw) as AuditResult;
} catch {
return null;
}
}
/** Audit a single primary file against its .ai.md and partner context. */
async function auditFile(absPrimary: string): Promise<AuditResult | null> {
const relPrimary = relative(XRPLD_ROOT, absPrimary);
console.log(`\n=== Auditing: ${relPrimary} ===`);
const primary = await readCapped(absPrimary, MAX_FILE_CHARS);
const primaryAiMd = await readCapped(`${absPrimary}.ai.md`, MAX_AI_MD_CHARS);
const absPartner = findPartner(absPrimary);
const relPartner = absPartner === null ? null : relative(XRPLD_ROOT, absPartner);
const partner = absPartner === null ? null : await readCapped(absPartner, MAX_FILE_CHARS);
const partnerAiMdPath = absPartner === null ? null : `${absPartner}.ai.md`;
const partnerAiMd =
partnerAiMdPath !== null && existsSync(partnerAiMdPath)
? await readCapped(partnerAiMdPath, MAX_AI_MD_CHARS)
: null;
const partnerBlock =
relPartner === null || partner === null
? ''
: `
## Partner File (${relPartner})
\`\`\`
${partner}
\`\`\`${
partnerAiMd === null
? ''
: `
## Partner's .ai.md (${relPartner}.ai.md)
${partnerAiMd}`
}`;
const userPrompt = `Audit the documentation coverage of this file against its authoritative .ai.md.
## Primary File (${relPrimary})
\`\`\`
${primary}
\`\`\`
## Primary's .ai.md (${relPrimary}.ai.md)
${primaryAiMd}${partnerBlock}
Output JSON per the schema in the system prompt. The "file" field MUST be
"${relPrimary}".`;
const systemPrompt = await loadSystemPrompt('audit-file', relPrimary);
let response = '';
const result = query({
prompt: userPrompt,
options: {
model: MODEL,
systemPrompt,
cwd: XRPLD_ROOT,
allowedTools: ['Read', 'Glob', 'Grep'],
permissionMode: 'acceptEdits',
},
});
for await (const message of result) {
if (message.type === 'assistant') {
const content = message.message?.content;
if (Array.isArray(content)) {
for (const block of content) {
if (block.type === 'text') response += block.text;
}
}
}
if (message.type === 'result') {
const cost = message.total_cost_usd?.toFixed(4) ?? '?';
const inTok = message.usage?.['input_tokens'] ?? 0;
const outTok = message.usage?.['output_tokens'] ?? 0;
console.log(` [Cost: $${cost}, Tokens: ${inTok}/${outTok}]`);
}
}
const parsed = extractJson(response);
if (parsed === null) {
console.warn(` No JSON output for ${relPrimary}, skipping`);
return null;
}
parsed.file = relPrimary;
return parsed;
}
/** Render the aggregated markdown report. */
function buildReport(results: readonly AuditResult[]): string {
const total = results.length;
const reruns = results.filter((r) => r.verdict === 'rerun');
const totalConcepts = results.reduce((s, r) => s + r.ai_md_concepts, 0);
const totalTranslated = results.reduce((s, r) => s + r.translated, 0);
const overallRate = totalConcepts === 0 ? 0 : Math.round((totalTranslated / totalConcepts) * 100);
const lines: string[] = [
'# Documentation Audit Report',
'',
`**Files audited:** ${total}`,
`**Overall translation rate:** ${overallRate}% (${totalTranslated} of ${totalConcepts} .ai.md concepts reflected in docstrings)`,
`**Files flagged for re-run:** ${reruns.length}`,
'',
'## Files flagged for re-run',
'',
];
if (reruns.length === 0) {
lines.push('_None — all audited files passed._', '');
} else {
lines.push('| File | Translated | Missed | Rate |', '|------|-----------:|-------:|-----:|');
for (const r of reruns.sort(
(a, b) =>
a.translated / Math.max(a.ai_md_concepts, 1) - b.translated / Math.max(b.ai_md_concepts, 1),
)) {
const rate = r.ai_md_concepts === 0 ? 0 : Math.round((r.translated / r.ai_md_concepts) * 100);
lines.push(`| \`${r.file}\` | ${r.translated} | ${r.missed.length} | ${rate}% |`);
}
lines.push('', '## Top missed concepts (sampled)', '');
for (const r of reruns.slice(0, 10)) {
if (r.missed.length === 0) continue;
lines.push(`### \`${r.file}\``, '');
for (const m of r.missed.slice(0, 5)) {
lines.push(`- **${m.function}** — ${m.topic}`);
lines.push(` > ${m.ai_md_quote.replace(/\n/g, ' ').slice(0, 200)}`);
}
lines.push('');
}
}
return lines.join('\n');
}
/**
* Run async work over a list of items with bounded concurrency. Mirrors the
* minimal slice of p-limit we actually need; collects results in input order.
*/
async function mapWithConcurrency<T, R>(
items: readonly T[],
limit: number,
worker: (item: T, index: number) => Promise<R>,
): Promise<R[]> {
const results = new Array<R>(items.length);
let next = 0;
async function pump(): Promise<void> {
while (true) {
const index = next++;
if (index >= items.length) return;
// biome-ignore lint/style/noNonNullAssertion: index < items.length
results[index] = await worker(items[index]!, index);
}
}
const workers = Array.from({ length: Math.min(limit, items.length) }, pump);
await Promise.all(workers);
return results;
}
/**
* Audit every C++ file with a .ai.md sibling under the target path.
*
* Concurrency is read from the AUDIT_CONCURRENCY env var (default 5).
*/
export async function auditTarget(target: string): Promise<void> {
const files = findAuditTargets(target);
const concurrency = Number(process.env['AUDIT_CONCURRENCY']) || DEFAULT_CONCURRENCY;
console.log(
`Found ${files.length} file(s) with .ai.md siblings to audit (concurrency=${concurrency}).`,
);
let completed = 0;
const raw = await mapWithConcurrency(files, concurrency, async (file) => {
try {
const result = await auditFile(file);
completed++;
console.log(` Progress: ${completed}/${files.length}`);
return result;
} catch (err) {
const message = err instanceof Error ? err.message : String(err);
console.warn(` Audit failed for ${file}: ${message}`);
completed++;
console.log(` Progress: ${completed}/${files.length}`);
return null;
}
});
const results = raw.filter((r): r is AuditResult => r !== null);
const report = buildReport(results);
await writeFile('doc-audit-report.md', report);
await writeFile('doc-audit-report.json', JSON.stringify(results, null, 2));
const reruns = results.filter((r) => r.verdict === 'rerun').length;
console.log(`\nAudited: ${results.length}/${files.length}`);
console.log(`Flagged for re-run: ${reruns}`);
console.log('Reports: doc-audit-report.md, doc-audit-report.json');
}

77
.github/scripts/doc-agent/src/config.ts vendored Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
/**
* Shared configuration for doc-agent.
*
* Paths are resolved relative to the doc-agent directory so the tool works
* regardless of where it's invoked from.
*/
import { dirname, resolve } from 'node:path';
import { fileURLToPath } from 'node:url';
const __filename = fileURLToPath(import.meta.url);
const __dirname = dirname(__filename);
/** Absolute path to the doc-agent root (parent of src/). */
export const AGENT_DIR: string = resolve(__dirname, '..');
/** Absolute path to the prompts directory. */
export const PROMPTS_DIR: string = resolve(AGENT_DIR, 'prompts');
/**
* Absolute path to the xrpld repo root.
*
* Defaults to three levels up from doc-agent (which lives at
* .github/scripts/doc-agent/). Override with the XRPLD_ROOT env var when
* running against a different checkout.
*/
export const XRPLD_ROOT: string = process.env['XRPLD_ROOT'] ?? resolve(AGENT_DIR, '..', '..', '..');
/** Model used for documentation generation and review. */
export const MODEL: string = process.env['DOC_AGENT_MODEL'] ?? 'claude-sonnet-4-6';
/** Absolute path to the skills directory inside the xrpld repo. */
export const SKILLS_DIR: string = resolve(XRPLD_ROOT, 'docs', 'skills');
/**
* Map module path prefixes to their skill file name in docs/skills/soul/.
*
* Used to inject module-specific context into the agent's system prompt
* when documenting or reviewing code in that module.
*/
export const MODULE_SKILL_MAP: Readonly<Record<string, string | null>> = {
'src/libxrpl/basics/': null,
'src/libxrpl/crypto/': 'cryptography.md',
'src/libxrpl/json/': null,
'src/libxrpl/beast/': null,
'src/libxrpl/protocol/': 'protocol.md',
'src/libxrpl/ledger/': 'ledger.md',
'src/libxrpl/tx/': 'transactors.md',
'src/libxrpl/nodestore/': 'nodestore.md',
'src/libxrpl/shamap/': 'shamap.md',
'src/libxrpl/rdb/': 'sql.md',
'src/xrpld/consensus/': 'consensus.md',
'src/xrpld/overlay/': 'peering.md',
'src/xrpld/peerfinder/': 'peering.md',
'src/xrpld/rpc/': 'rpc.md',
'include/xrpl/crypto/': 'cryptography.md',
'include/xrpl/protocol/': 'protocol.md',
'include/xrpl/ledger/': 'ledger.md',
'include/xrpl/tx/': 'transactors.md',
'include/xrpl/nodestore/': 'nodestore.md',
'include/xrpl/shamap/': 'shamap.md',
};
/**
* Resolve which skill file applies to a given source path.
*
* @param sourcePath - Path relative to the xrpld repo root
* @returns The skill file name, or null if no skill applies
*/
export function skillForPath(sourcePath: string): string | null {
for (const [prefix, skillFile] of Object.entries(MODULE_SKILL_MAP)) {
if (sourcePath.startsWith(prefix) || sourcePath.includes(`/${prefix}`)) {
return skillFile;
}
}
return null;
}

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,160 @@
/**
* Document mode: add Doxygen docs to a file or all files in a directory.
*/
import { existsSync, readdirSync, statSync } from 'node:fs';
import { readFile } from 'node:fs/promises';
import { join, relative, resolve } from 'node:path';
import { query } from '@anthropic-ai/claude-agent-sdk';
import { MODEL, XRPLD_ROOT } from './config.js';
import { findPartner } from './pairing.js';
import { loadSystemPrompt } from './prompt-loader.js';
const CPP_EXTENSIONS: ReadonlySet<string> = new Set(['.h', '.hpp', '.cpp']);
/**
* Recursively find all C++ source files under a target path.
*
* @param target - File or directory path (relative to xrpld root or absolute)
* @returns Absolute paths of all matching files
*/
function findCppFiles(target: string): string[] {
const absTarget = resolve(XRPLD_ROOT, target);
if (!existsSync(absTarget)) {
throw new Error(`Target does not exist: ${absTarget}`);
}
const stat = statSync(absTarget);
if (stat.isFile()) {
return [absTarget];
}
const results: string[] = [];
const walk = (dir: string): void => {
for (const entry of readdirSync(dir, { withFileTypes: true })) {
const full = join(dir, entry.name);
if (entry.isDirectory()) {
walk(full);
} else if (entry.isFile()) {
const dotIdx = entry.name.lastIndexOf('.');
if (dotIdx === -1) continue;
const ext = entry.name.slice(dotIdx);
if (CPP_EXTENSIONS.has(ext)) {
results.push(full);
}
}
}
};
walk(absTarget);
return results;
}
/**
* Read the sibling .ai.md file for a source file, if one exists.
*
* The athenah-ai pipeline produces a `<file>.ai.md` companion for every
* documented source file (e.g., `Slice.h` -> `Slice.h.ai.md`). When present,
* it is high-signal prose describing the file's purpose, design, and
* non-obvious behavior — the agent should use it as the authoritative
* source of intent.
*/
async function readAiContext(absPath: string): Promise<string | null> {
const aiPath = `${absPath}.ai.md`;
if (!existsSync(aiPath)) return null;
return await readFile(aiPath, 'utf8');
}
/**
* Document a single file by running the documentation agent against it.
*
* Inject the partner file's path + its `.ai.md` (if any) into the prompt
* so the agent can apply the "contract on header, implementation on
* source" policy with full visibility into the other half. The agent
* Reads the partner only as reference; only the primary file is edited.
*/
async function documentFile(absPath: string): Promise<void> {
const relPath = relative(XRPLD_ROOT, absPath);
console.log(`\n=== Documenting: ${relPath} ===`);
const systemPrompt = await loadSystemPrompt('document-file', relPath);
const aiContext = await readAiContext(absPath);
const aiContextBlock =
aiContext === null
? ''
: `\n\n## Primary's Authoritative AI Context (${relPath}.ai.md)\n\nThe following is high-signal prose describing this file's purpose, design,\nand non-obvious behavior. Treat it as the source of truth for intent and\nbehavior. Your job is to translate this into structured Doxygen \`/** */\`\ncomments on the actual declarations.\n\n---\n\n${aiContext}\n---`;
const absPartner = findPartner(absPath);
const relPartner = absPartner === null ? null : relative(XRPLD_ROOT, absPartner);
const partnerAiContext = absPartner === null ? null : await readAiContext(absPartner);
const partnerBlock =
relPartner === null
? ''
: `\n\n## Partner File\n\nThis file's partner is **${relPartner}**. Use the Read tool to see its\ncurrent docstrings before deciding what belongs on the primary. A concept\nalready documented on the partner does not need to be duplicated here.\nConversely, an implementation-depth concept currently on the partner that\nbelongs on the source (or vice versa) should be moved.${
partnerAiContext === null
? ''
: `\n\n### Partner's Authoritative AI Context (${relPartner}.ai.md)\n\n---\n\n${partnerAiContext}\n---`
}`;
const userPrompt = `Add Doxygen documentation to: ${relPath}
The file is rooted at ${XRPLD_ROOT}. Use the Read tool to read it, the Edit
tool to add documentation, and Glob/Grep to find related tests or callers
when needed.${
relPartner === null
? ''
: ` Use Read on the partner file (${relPartner}) to see what's already
documented there.`
}
Do not modify any code logic — only add documentation comments to the
primary file (${relPath}). Do NOT edit the partner file.${aiContextBlock}${partnerBlock}`;
const result = query({
prompt: userPrompt,
options: {
model: MODEL,
systemPrompt,
cwd: XRPLD_ROOT,
allowedTools: ['Read', 'Edit', 'Glob', 'Grep', 'Bash'],
permissionMode: 'acceptEdits',
},
});
for await (const message of result) {
if (message.type === 'assistant') {
const content = message.message?.content;
if (Array.isArray(content)) {
for (const block of content) {
if (block.type === 'text') {
process.stdout.write(block.text);
}
}
}
}
if (message.type === 'result') {
const cost = message.total_cost_usd?.toFixed(4) ?? '?';
const inTok = message.usage?.['input_tokens'] ?? 0;
const outTok = message.usage?.['output_tokens'] ?? 0;
console.log(`\n[Cost: $${cost}, Tokens: ${inTok}/${outTok}]`);
}
}
}
/**
* Document a file or every C++ file under a directory.
*
* @param target - File or directory path
*/
export async function documentTarget(target: string): Promise<void> {
const files = findCppFiles(target);
console.log(`Found ${files.length} C++ file(s) to document.`);
for (const file of files) {
try {
await documentFile(file);
} catch (err) {
const message = err instanceof Error ? err.message : String(err);
console.error(`Failed to document ${file}: ${message}`);
}
}
}

91
.github/scripts/doc-agent/src/index.ts vendored Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
#!/usr/bin/env node
/**
* xrpld doc-agent CLI entry point.
*
* @example
* doc-agent document src/libxrpl/basics/base_uint.h
* doc-agent document include/xrpl/basics/
* doc-agent review develop..HEAD
* doc-agent review --pr 1234
* doc-agent regen-skills protocol
*/
import { auditTarget } from './audit.js';
import { documentTarget } from './document.js';
import { regenSkills } from './regen-skills.js';
import { reviewDiff } from './review.js';
const USAGE = `
xrpld doc-agent
Usage:
doc-agent document <file-or-directory> Add Doxygen documentation
doc-agent review <base>..<head> Detect doc drift in range
doc-agent review --pr <number> Detect doc drift for a PR
doc-agent audit <file-or-directory> Measure how completely each file's
docstrings reflect its .ai.md intent;
outputs doc-audit-report.{md,json}
doc-agent regen-skills <module> Regenerate docs/skills/soul/<module>.md
from sibling .ai.md files
Environment:
ANTHROPIC_API_KEY (required) Anthropic API key
XRPLD_ROOT (optional) Path to xrpld repo root (default: repo root)
DOC_AGENT_MODEL (optional) Model override (default: claude-opus-4-7)
`;
function printUsageAndExit(code: number): never {
console.error(USAGE);
process.exit(code);
}
const HELP_MODES: ReadonlySet<string> = new Set(['help', '--help', '-h']);
async function main(): Promise<void> {
const [mode, ...args] = process.argv.slice(2);
if (process.env['ANTHROPIC_API_KEY'] === undefined) {
console.error('ERROR: ANTHROPIC_API_KEY environment variable is required.');
process.exit(1);
}
if (mode === undefined || HELP_MODES.has(mode)) {
printUsageAndExit(0);
}
if (mode === 'document') {
const target = args[0];
if (target === undefined) printUsageAndExit(1);
await documentTarget(target);
return;
}
if (mode === 'review') {
if (args.length === 0) printUsageAndExit(1);
await reviewDiff(args);
return;
}
if (mode === 'audit') {
const target = args[0];
if (target === undefined) printUsageAndExit(1);
await auditTarget(target);
return;
}
if (mode === 'regen-skills') {
const moduleName = args[0];
if (moduleName === undefined) printUsageAndExit(1);
await regenSkills(moduleName);
return;
}
console.error(`Unknown mode: ${mode}`);
printUsageAndExit(1);
}
main().catch((err: unknown) => {
const message = err instanceof Error ? (err.stack ?? err.message) : String(err);
console.error('FATAL:', message);
process.exit(1);
});

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
/**
* Header/source pairing for C++ files in the xrpld layout.
*
* libxrpl: src/libxrpl/<X>.cpp <-> include/xrpl/<X>.h
* xrpld: src/xrpld/<X>.cpp <-> src/xrpld/<X>.h (same directory)
*
* Inline-only headers may have no .cpp partner; standalone .cpp may have
* no .h partner.
*/
import { existsSync } from 'node:fs';
import { relative, resolve } from 'node:path';
import { XRPLD_ROOT } from './config.js';
/**
* Compute the partner file path for a given primary, by swapping the
* extension between header/source. Returns null if no candidate exists
* on disk.
*/
export function findPartner(absPrimary: string): string | null {
const rel = relative(XRPLD_ROOT, absPrimary);
const dotIdx = rel.lastIndexOf('.');
if (dotIdx === -1) return null;
const stem = rel.slice(0, dotIdx);
const ext = rel.slice(dotIdx);
const candidates: string[] = [];
if (ext === '.cpp') {
if (stem.startsWith('src/libxrpl/')) {
const tail = stem.slice('src/libxrpl/'.length);
candidates.push(`include/xrpl/${tail}.h`, `include/xrpl/${tail}.hpp`);
}
candidates.push(`${stem}.h`, `${stem}.hpp`);
} else if (ext === '.h' || ext === '.hpp') {
if (stem.startsWith('include/xrpl/')) {
candidates.push(`src/libxrpl/${stem.slice('include/xrpl/'.length)}.cpp`);
}
candidates.push(`${stem}.cpp`);
}
for (const candidate of candidates) {
const abs = resolve(XRPLD_ROOT, candidate);
if (existsSync(abs) && abs !== absPrimary) return abs;
}
return null;
}

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
/**
* Loads system prompts and injects module-specific skill context.
*/
import { existsSync } from 'node:fs';
import { readFile } from 'node:fs/promises';
import { resolve } from 'node:path';
import { PROMPTS_DIR, SKILLS_DIR, skillForPath } from './config.js';
/**
* Load a system prompt from prompts/ and append the relevant module skill
* if one applies to the given source path.
*
* @param promptName - Base name of the prompt file (without .md extension)
* @param sourcePath - Path relative to the xrpld repo root
* @returns The fully-assembled system prompt
*/
export async function loadSystemPrompt(promptName: string, sourcePath: string): Promise<string> {
const basePromptPath = resolve(PROMPTS_DIR, `${promptName}.md`);
const basePrompt = await readFile(basePromptPath, 'utf8');
const skillFile = skillForPath(sourcePath);
if (skillFile === null) {
return basePrompt;
}
const skillPath = resolve(SKILLS_DIR, skillFile);
if (!existsSync(skillPath)) {
return basePrompt;
}
const skill = await readFile(skillPath, 'utf8');
return `${basePrompt}\n\n## Module Skill (${skillFile})\n\n${skill}`;
}

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,166 @@
/**
* Regen-skills mode: rebuild a module's skill file from ai.md inputs.
*
* For a given module (e.g. `protocol`, `ledger`, `consensus`), collect all
* `.ai.md` files under the matching source paths and ask the Agent SDK to
* write an updated `docs/skills/<module>.md`.
*
* The agent writes the file via the `Write` tool rather than returning the
* skill content as text. This avoids hitting the per-turn output token
* limit on large modules (which previously truncated several skill files).
*/
import { existsSync, readdirSync, statSync } from 'node:fs';
import { readFile } from 'node:fs/promises';
import { join, relative, resolve } from 'node:path';
import { query } from '@anthropic-ai/claude-agent-sdk';
import { MODEL, MODULE_SKILL_MAP, PROMPTS_DIR, SKILLS_DIR, XRPLD_ROOT } from './config.js';
interface AiFile {
readonly sourcePath: string;
readonly content: string;
}
/** Resolve which source-tree prefixes feed a given skill file. */
function prefixesForSkill(skillFile: string): string[] {
return Object.entries(MODULE_SKILL_MAP)
.filter(([, mapped]) => mapped === skillFile)
.map(([prefix]) => prefix);
}
/** Walk a directory and collect all sibling .ai.md files. */
function collectAiFiles(prefix: string): string[] {
const absDir = resolve(XRPLD_ROOT, prefix);
if (!existsSync(absDir) || !statSync(absDir).isDirectory()) return [];
const results: string[] = [];
const walk = (dir: string): void => {
for (const entry of readdirSync(dir, { withFileTypes: true })) {
const full = join(dir, entry.name);
if (entry.isDirectory()) {
walk(full);
} else if (entry.isFile() && entry.name.endsWith('.ai.md')) {
results.push(full);
}
}
};
walk(absDir);
return results;
}
async function loadAiFiles(absPaths: readonly string[]): Promise<AiFile[]> {
const files: AiFile[] = [];
for (const absPath of absPaths) {
const content = await readFile(absPath, 'utf8');
files.push({
sourcePath: relative(XRPLD_ROOT, absPath).replace(/\.ai\.md$/, ''),
content,
});
}
return files;
}
/**
* Regenerate the skill file for a given module name.
*
* @param moduleName - The skill file name without extension (e.g. "protocol",
* "ledger"). Must match a value in MODULE_SKILL_MAP.
*/
export async function regenSkills(moduleName: string): Promise<void> {
const skillFile = `${moduleName}.md`;
const prefixes = prefixesForSkill(skillFile);
if (prefixes.length === 0) {
const known = Array.from(
new Set(Object.values(MODULE_SKILL_MAP).filter((v): v is string => v !== null)),
);
throw new Error(`Unknown module: ${moduleName}. Valid modules: ${known.join(', ')}`);
}
console.log(`Regenerating skill: ${skillFile}`);
console.log(` Source prefixes: ${prefixes.join(', ')}`);
const aiPaths = prefixes.flatMap((prefix) => collectAiFiles(prefix));
if (aiPaths.length === 0) {
console.warn(' No .ai.md files found for this module. Skipping.');
return;
}
console.log(` Found ${aiPaths.length} .ai.md file(s)`);
const aiFiles = await loadAiFiles(aiPaths);
const skillPath = resolve(SKILLS_DIR, skillFile);
const skillRelPath = relative(XRPLD_ROOT, skillPath);
const existingSkill = existsSync(skillPath)
? await readFile(skillPath, 'utf8')
: '(no existing skill file — create a new one)';
const systemPrompt = await readFile(resolve(PROMPTS_DIR, 'regen-skill.md'), 'utf8');
const aiBlocks = aiFiles
.map((f) => `\n### \`${f.sourcePath}\`\n\n${f.content}`)
.join('\n\n---\n');
const userPrompt = `Regenerate the skill file at: \`${skillRelPath}\`
Use the **Write** tool to write the new content to that path. Do NOT return
the skill content in your message — write it directly to the file. This
avoids hitting per-turn output token limits.
## Existing skill content
${existingSkill}
## AI context files for this module
${aiBlocks}
When you have written the file, respond with a brief one-line confirmation.`;
const result = query({
prompt: userPrompt,
options: {
model: MODEL,
systemPrompt,
cwd: XRPLD_ROOT,
allowedTools: ['Write', 'Edit', 'Read', 'Glob', 'Grep'],
permissionMode: 'acceptEdits',
},
});
let writeCount = 0;
let editCount = 0;
for await (const message of result) {
if (message.type === 'assistant') {
const content = message.message?.content;
if (Array.isArray(content)) {
for (const block of content) {
if (block.type === 'tool_use' && block.name === 'Write') {
writeCount++;
const input = block.input as { file_path?: string } | undefined;
if (input?.file_path !== undefined) {
console.log(` Write: ${input.file_path}`);
}
}
if (block.type === 'tool_use' && block.name === 'Edit') {
editCount++;
const input = block.input as { file_path?: string } | undefined;
if (input?.file_path !== undefined) {
console.log(` Edit: ${input.file_path}`);
}
}
}
}
}
if (message.type === 'result') {
const cost = message.total_cost_usd?.toFixed(4) ?? '?';
console.log(` [Cost: $${cost}]`);
}
}
if (writeCount === 0) {
console.error(' Agent did not call Write — skill file not updated.');
return;
}
console.log(` Wrote: ${skillRelPath} (${writeCount} Write + ${editCount} Edit calls)`);
}

222
.github/scripts/doc-agent/src/review.ts vendored Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,222 @@
/**
* Review mode: detect documentation drift in a git diff range.
*
* Used by the doc-review GitHub Action and locally for testing.
*/
import { execSync } from 'node:child_process';
import { writeFile } from 'node:fs/promises';
import { query } from '@anthropic-ai/claude-agent-sdk';
import { MODEL, XRPLD_ROOT } from './config.js';
import { loadSystemPrompt } from './prompt-loader.js';
import type { FileReviewResult, GitRange, ReviewIssue, ReviewOutput } from './types.js';
const MAX_DIFF_CHARS = 12_000;
const TRACKED_PATH_PATTERN = /^(include|src\/libxrpl|src\/xrpld)\//;
const CPP_FILE_PATTERN = /\.(h|hpp|cpp)$/;
/**
* Parse the CLI arguments into a base..head git range.
*
* Accepts either:
* - `base..head` (e.g. `develop..HEAD`)
* - `--pr <number>` (resolves via `gh pr view`)
*/
function parseRangeArgs(args: readonly string[]): GitRange {
const first = args[0];
if (first === undefined) {
throw new Error('Expected range as base..head or --pr <number>');
}
if (first === '--pr') {
const pr = args[1];
if (pr === undefined) {
throw new Error('--pr requires a PR number');
}
const base = execSync(`gh pr view ${pr} --json baseRefOid -q .baseRefOid`, {
cwd: XRPLD_ROOT,
})
.toString()
.trim();
const head = execSync(`gh pr view ${pr} --json headRefOid -q .headRefOid`, {
cwd: XRPLD_ROOT,
})
.toString()
.trim();
return { base, head };
}
const match = first.match(/^([^.]+)\.\.([^.]+)$/);
if (match === null || match[1] === undefined || match[2] === undefined) {
throw new Error('Expected range as base..head or --pr <number>');
}
return { base: match[1], head: match[2] };
}
/**
* Get the list of C++ source files changed in the given git range,
* filtered to paths the doc-agent cares about.
*/
function getChangedCppFiles(range: GitRange): string[] {
const out = execSync(`git diff --name-only ${range.base}...${range.head}`, {
cwd: XRPLD_ROOT,
}).toString();
return out
.split('\n')
.filter((line) => line.length > 0)
.filter((file) => CPP_FILE_PATTERN.test(file))
.filter((file) => TRACKED_PATH_PATTERN.test(file));
}
/** Get the unified diff for a single file in the given range. */
function getFileDiff(range: GitRange, file: string): string {
return execSync(`git diff ${range.base}...${range.head} -- "${file}"`, {
cwd: XRPLD_ROOT,
maxBuffer: 10 * 1024 * 1024,
}).toString();
}
/** Extract a JSON object from a possibly-fenced model response. */
function extractJson(response: string): ReviewOutput | null {
const fenced = response.match(/```json\s*([\s\S]*?)```/);
const raw = fenced?.[1] ?? response.match(/(\{[\s\S]*\})/)?.[1];
if (raw === undefined) return null;
try {
return JSON.parse(raw) as ReviewOutput;
} catch {
return null;
}
}
/** Send one file's diff to the agent and parse the response. */
async function reviewFile(range: GitRange, file: string): Promise<FileReviewResult | null> {
console.log(`\n=== Reviewing: ${file} ===`);
const diff = getFileDiff(range, file);
if (diff.trim().length === 0) return null;
const systemPrompt = await loadSystemPrompt('review-diff', file);
const userPrompt = `Review this diff for documentation drift:
## File: ${file}
## Diff
\`\`\`
${diff.slice(0, MAX_DIFF_CHARS)}
\`\`\`
Use the Read tool to inspect the current state of the file, related tests,
or callers if needed. Output findings as JSON per the schema in the system
prompt.`;
let response = '';
const result = query({
prompt: userPrompt,
options: {
model: MODEL,
systemPrompt,
cwd: XRPLD_ROOT,
allowedTools: ['Read', 'Glob', 'Grep', 'Bash'],
permissionMode: 'acceptEdits',
},
});
for await (const message of result) {
if (message.type === 'assistant') {
const content = message.message?.content;
if (Array.isArray(content)) {
for (const block of content) {
if (block.type === 'text') {
response += block.text;
}
}
}
}
}
const parsed = extractJson(response);
if (parsed === null) {
console.warn(` No JSON output for ${file}, skipping`);
return null;
}
const issues: ReviewIssue[] = parsed.issues.map((issue) => ({
file: issue.file ?? file,
line: issue.line,
severity: issue.severity,
message: issue.message,
...(issue.suggested_doc !== undefined && { suggestedDoc: issue.suggested_doc }),
}));
return { file, summary: parsed.summary, issues };
}
/** Build the markdown report posted to the PR. */
function buildReport(fileCount: number, results: readonly FileReviewResult[]): string {
const issues = results.flatMap((r) => r.issues);
const warnings = issues.filter((i) => i.severity === 'warning').length;
const suggestions = issues.length - warnings;
const lines: string[] = ['## Documentation Review Report', ''];
lines.push(
issues.length === 0
? 'No documentation issues found.'
: `Found **${issues.length}** issue(s) across **${fileCount}** changed file(s): ${warnings} warning(s), ${suggestions} suggestion(s).`,
);
lines.push('');
for (const result of results) {
if (result.issues.length === 0) continue;
lines.push(`### \`${result.file}\``, '', result.summary, '');
for (const issue of result.issues) {
const tag = issue.severity === 'warning' ? '**Warning:**' : '**Suggestion:**';
lines.push(`- ${tag} Line ${issue.line}: ${issue.message}`);
}
lines.push('');
}
lines.push('---', '*Automated review by doc-agent.*');
return lines.join('\n');
}
/**
* Review the documentation drift introduced by a git range or PR.
*
* Writes two output files in the current working directory:
* - doc-review-report.md (markdown summary for PR comment)
* - doc-review-comments.json (inline review comments)
*/
export async function reviewDiff(args: readonly string[]): Promise<void> {
const range = parseRangeArgs(args);
console.log(`Reviewing range: ${range.base}...${range.head}`);
const files = getChangedCppFiles(range);
if (files.length === 0) {
console.log('No C++ files changed in this range.');
await writeFile('doc-review-report.md', '## Documentation Review\n\nNo C++ files changed.\n');
await writeFile('doc-review-comments.json', '[]');
return;
}
console.log(`Found ${files.length} changed C++ file(s).`);
const results: FileReviewResult[] = [];
for (const file of files) {
try {
const result = await reviewFile(range, file);
if (result !== null) results.push(result);
} catch (err) {
const message = err instanceof Error ? err.message : String(err);
console.warn(` Review failed for ${file}: ${message}`);
}
}
const report = buildReport(files.length, results);
const allIssues = results.flatMap((r) => r.issues);
await writeFile('doc-review-report.md', report);
await writeFile('doc-review-comments.json', JSON.stringify(allIssues, null, 2));
console.log('\nReport: doc-review-report.md');
console.log(`Inline comments: doc-review-comments.json (${allIssues.length} issues)`);
}

37
.github/scripts/doc-agent/src/types.ts vendored Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
/**
* Shared type definitions for the doc-agent.
*/
export type Severity = 'warning' | 'suggestion';
export interface ReviewIssue {
file: string;
line: number;
severity: Severity;
message: string;
suggestedDoc?: string;
}
export interface FileReviewResult {
file: string;
summary: string;
issues: ReviewIssue[];
}
export interface ReviewOutput {
summary: string;
issues: Array<{
file?: string;
line: number;
severity: Severity;
message: string;
suggested_doc?: string;
}>;
}
export interface GitRange {
base: string;
head: string;
}
export type AgentMode = 'document' | 'review';

39
.github/scripts/doc-agent/tsconfig.json vendored Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
{
"compilerOptions": {
"target": "ES2022",
"module": "NodeNext",
"moduleResolution": "NodeNext",
"lib": ["ES2023"],
"outDir": "dist",
"rootDir": "src",
"strict": true,
"noImplicitAny": true,
"strictNullChecks": true,
"strictFunctionTypes": true,
"strictBindCallApply": true,
"strictPropertyInitialization": true,
"noImplicitThis": true,
"alwaysStrict": true,
"noUnusedLocals": true,
"noUnusedParameters": true,
"exactOptionalPropertyTypes": true,
"noImplicitReturns": true,
"noFallthroughCasesInSwitch": true,
"noUncheckedIndexedAccess": true,
"noImplicitOverride": true,
"noPropertyAccessFromIndexSignature": true,
"allowUnusedLabels": false,
"allowUnreachableCode": false,
"esModuleInterop": true,
"forceConsistentCasingInFileNames": true,
"skipLibCheck": true,
"declaration": true,
"declarationMap": true,
"sourceMap": true,
"resolveJsonModule": true,
"isolatedModules": true,
"verbatimModuleSyntax": true
},
"include": ["src/**/*"],
"exclude": ["node_modules", "dist"]
}

277
.github/scripts/doc-coverage-check.py vendored Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,277 @@
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""
Documentation coverage checker for xrpld.
Parses coverxygen LCOV output, compares against per-module thresholds
defined in .github/doc-coverage-thresholds.json, and generates a
markdown report suitable for posting as a PR comment.
Usage:
python3 doc-coverage-check.py \
--lcov-file doc-coverage.info \
--threshold-file .github/doc-coverage-thresholds.json \
--output doc-coverage-report.md \
[--base-lcov-file base-doc-coverage.info]
"""
import argparse
import json
import re
import sys
from collections import defaultdict
from pathlib import Path
def parse_lcov(lcov_path: str) -> dict[str, dict[str, int]]:
"""Parse LCOV-format file into per-file coverage data.
Returns a dict mapping file paths to {"documented": N, "total": N}.
"""
coverage = {}
current_file = None
documented = 0
total = 0
with open(lcov_path) as f:
for line in f:
line = line.strip()
if line.startswith("SF:"):
current_file = line[3:]
documented = 0
total = 0
elif line.startswith("DA:"):
parts = line[3:].split(",")
if len(parts) >= 2:
total += 1
if int(parts[1]) > 0:
documented += 1
elif line == "end_of_record":
if current_file:
coverage[current_file] = {
"documented": documented,
"total": total,
}
current_file = None
return coverage
def compute_module_coverage(
coverage: dict[str, dict[str, int]],
module_prefixes: list[str],
) -> dict[str, dict[str, int | float]]:
"""Aggregate file-level coverage into module-level stats."""
modules = {}
for prefix in module_prefixes:
doc = 0
tot = 0
for filepath, stats in coverage.items():
if filepath.startswith(prefix) or f"/{prefix}" in filepath:
doc += stats["documented"]
tot += stats["total"]
pct = (doc / tot * 100) if tot > 0 else 0.0
modules[prefix] = {"documented": doc, "total": tot, "percent": round(pct, 1)}
return modules
def compute_global_coverage(
coverage: dict[str, dict[str, int]],
) -> dict[str, int | float]:
"""Compute overall coverage across all files."""
doc = sum(s["documented"] for s in coverage.values())
tot = sum(s["total"] for s in coverage.values())
pct = (doc / tot * 100) if tot > 0 else 0.0
return {"documented": doc, "total": tot, "percent": round(pct, 1)}
def check_ratchet(
current: dict[str, dict[str, int | float]],
base: dict[str, dict[str, int | float]] | None,
current_global: dict[str, int | float],
base_global: dict[str, int | float] | None,
) -> list[str]:
"""Check that no module or global coverage decreased vs base branch."""
violations = []
if base_global and current_global["percent"] < base_global["percent"]:
violations.append(
f"Global coverage decreased: {base_global['percent']}% -> "
f"{current_global['percent']}%"
)
if base:
for module, stats in current.items():
if module in base and stats["percent"] < base[module]["percent"]:
violations.append(
f"`{module}` coverage decreased: "
f"{base[module]['percent']}% -> {stats['percent']}%"
)
return violations
def check_new_files(
coverage: dict[str, dict[str, int]],
new_files: list[str],
min_coverage: int,
) -> list[str]:
"""Check that new files meet minimum documentation coverage."""
violations = []
for filepath in new_files:
for covered_path, stats in coverage.items():
if filepath in covered_path or covered_path.endswith(filepath):
if stats["total"] > 0:
pct = stats["documented"] / stats["total"] * 100
if pct < min_coverage:
violations.append(
f"`{filepath}` has {pct:.0f}% doc coverage "
f"(minimum {min_coverage}%)"
)
break
return violations
def coverage_emoji(pct: float) -> str:
if pct >= 80:
return "+"
if pct >= 50:
return "~"
return "-"
def generate_report(
global_stats: dict[str, int | float],
module_stats: dict[str, dict[str, int | float]],
thresholds: dict,
violations: list[str],
new_file_violations: list[str],
) -> str:
"""Generate a markdown report for the PR comment."""
lines = []
lines.append("## Documentation Coverage Report")
lines.append("")
passed = not violations and not new_file_violations
status = "PASSED" if passed else "FAILED"
lines.append(f"**Status:** {status}")
lines.append(
f"**Global Coverage:** {global_stats['percent']}% "
f"({global_stats['documented']}/{global_stats['total']} entities documented)"
)
lines.append(
f"**Minimum Threshold:** {thresholds.get('global_minimum', 0)}%"
)
lines.append("")
if violations or new_file_violations:
lines.append("### Violations")
lines.append("")
for v in violations + new_file_violations:
lines.append(f"- {v}")
lines.append("")
lines.append("### Module Coverage")
lines.append("")
lines.append("| Module | Coverage | Documented | Total | Threshold |")
lines.append("|--------|----------|------------|-------|-----------|")
module_thresholds = thresholds.get("module_thresholds", {})
for module in sorted(module_stats.keys()):
stats = module_stats[module]
threshold = module_thresholds.get(module, 0)
emoji = coverage_emoji(stats["percent"])
lines.append(
f"| `{module}` | {stats['percent']}% | "
f"{stats['documented']} | {stats['total']} | {threshold}% |"
)
lines.append("")
lines.append(
"*Coverage measured by [coverxygen](https://github.com/psycofdj/coverxygen). "
"See [docs/DOCUMENTATION_STANDARDS.md](../docs/DOCUMENTATION_STANDARDS.md) "
"for documentation guidelines.*"
)
return "\n".join(lines)
def main():
parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description="Check documentation coverage")
parser.add_argument("--lcov-file", required=True, help="Path to LCOV coverage file")
parser.add_argument(
"--threshold-file", required=True, help="Path to thresholds JSON"
)
parser.add_argument("--output", required=True, help="Path to write markdown report")
parser.add_argument(
"--base-lcov-file", default=None, help="Path to base branch LCOV file"
)
parser.add_argument(
"--new-files",
default="",
help="Comma-separated list of new C++ files in this PR",
)
args = parser.parse_args()
with open(args.threshold_file) as f:
thresholds = json.load(f)
coverage = parse_lcov(args.lcov_file)
module_prefixes = list(thresholds.get("module_thresholds", {}).keys())
module_stats = compute_module_coverage(coverage, module_prefixes)
global_stats = compute_global_coverage(coverage)
base_coverage = None
base_module_stats = None
base_global_stats = None
if args.base_lcov_file and Path(args.base_lcov_file).exists():
base_coverage = parse_lcov(args.base_lcov_file)
base_module_stats = compute_module_coverage(base_coverage, module_prefixes)
base_global_stats = compute_global_coverage(base_coverage)
violations = []
if global_stats["percent"] < thresholds.get("global_minimum", 0):
violations.append(
f"Global coverage {global_stats['percent']}% is below minimum "
f"{thresholds['global_minimum']}%"
)
for module, threshold in thresholds.get("module_thresholds", {}).items():
if module in module_stats and module_stats[module]["percent"] < threshold:
violations.append(
f"`{module}` coverage {module_stats[module]['percent']}% is below "
f"threshold {threshold}%"
)
if thresholds.get("ratchet_mode") == "no_decrease":
violations.extend(
check_ratchet(
module_stats, base_module_stats, global_stats, base_global_stats
)
)
new_file_violations = []
if args.new_files:
new_files = [f.strip() for f in args.new_files.split(",") if f.strip()]
new_file_min = thresholds.get("new_file_minimum", 80)
new_file_violations = check_new_files(coverage, new_files, new_file_min)
report = generate_report(
global_stats, module_stats, thresholds, violations, new_file_violations
)
with open(args.output, "w") as f:
f.write(report)
print(report)
if violations or new_file_violations:
print(f"\nFAILED: {len(violations) + len(new_file_violations)} violation(s)")
sys.exit(1)
else:
print("\nPASSED: All coverage thresholds met")
sys.exit(0)
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()

View File

@@ -1,403 +0,0 @@
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""
Format embedded shell snippets using the shfmt hook configured in
.pre-commit-config.yaml.
Two shapes are recognised:
* YAML workflow/action files: literal block-scalar runs (`run: |`) and
single-line runs (`run: some command`). A single-line run is upgraded to
a `run: |` block scalar if shfmt's output spans multiple lines.
* Markdown files: ``` ```bash ``` fenced code blocks.
Any block that shfmt cannot parse is skipped with a warning on stderr, so
the file is left untouched and surrounding blocks still get formatted.
For each occurrence the body is dedented, written to a temp .sh file,
formatted via `pre-commit run shfmt --files <temp>` (falling back to
`prek`), then re-indented and written back in place.
When invoked without arguments, every .yml/.yaml under .github/ plus every
.md file in the repo is scanned. When invoked with file arguments (the
pre-commit case), only those files are processed.
"""
from __future__ import annotations
import re
import shutil
import subprocess
import sys
import tempfile
from dataclasses import dataclass
from pathlib import Path
from typing import Union
REPO = Path(__file__).resolve().parents[2]
_HOOK_RUNNER = next((cmd for cmd in ("pre-commit", "prek") if shutil.which(cmd)), None)
if _HOOK_RUNNER is None:
sys.exit("error: neither `pre-commit` nor `prek` found on PATH")
RUN_BLOCK_RE = re.compile(r"^(?P<prefix>[ \t]*(?:- )?)run:[ \t]*\|[+-]?[ \t]*$")
RUN_INLINE_RE = re.compile(
r"^(?P<prefix>[ \t]*(?:- )?)run:[ \t]+" r"(?P<value>(?!\|[+-]?[ \t]*$)\S.*?)[ \t]*$"
)
MD_BASH_OPEN_RE = re.compile(r"^(?P<indent>[ ]{0,3})`{3}bash[ \t]*$")
MD_FENCE_CLOSE_RE = re.compile(r"^[ ]{0,3}`{3,}[ \t]*$")
@dataclass(frozen=True)
class BlockRun:
"""A `run: |` block scalar; `body_start:body_end` slices into `lines`."""
body_start: int
body_end: int
body_indent: int
@dataclass(frozen=True)
class InlineRun:
"""A single-line `run: value` at `line_idx`."""
line_idx: int
prefix: str
value: str
@dataclass(frozen=True)
class MdBashBlock:
"""A markdown ``` ```bash ``` fenced code block.
`body_start:body_end` slices into the file's lines; `open_line_idx`
points at the opening fence line.
"""
open_line_idx: int
body_start: int
body_end: int
body_indent: int
RunItem = Union[BlockRun, InlineRun]
def _scan_block_body(
lines: list[str], body_start: int, run_col: int
) -> tuple[int | None, int]:
"""Locate the body of a `run: |` block scalar starting at `body_start`.
Returns `(body_indent, scan_end)`. `scan_end` is the line index where the
outer scanner should resume. `body_indent` is `None` when no body is
present (the scalar is empty, or the next non-blank line has indent
`<= run_col`).
"""
body_indent: int | None = None
scan_end = len(lines)
for idx in range(body_start, len(lines)):
line = lines[idx]
if line.strip() == "":
continue
indent = len(line) - len(line.lstrip(" "))
if body_indent is None:
if indent > run_col:
body_indent = indent
else:
scan_end = idx
break
elif indent < body_indent:
scan_end = idx
break
if body_indent is not None:
while scan_end > body_start and lines[scan_end - 1].strip() == "":
scan_end -= 1
if scan_end <= body_start:
body_indent = None
return body_indent, scan_end
def find_run_blocks(lines: list[str]) -> list[RunItem]:
"""Return run items in document order."""
items: list[RunItem] = []
line_idx = 0
while line_idx < len(lines):
line = lines[line_idx]
if block_match := RUN_BLOCK_RE.match(line):
run_col = len(block_match.group("prefix"))
body_start = line_idx + 1
body_indent, scan_end = _scan_block_body(lines, body_start, run_col)
if body_indent is not None:
items.append(
BlockRun(
body_start=body_start,
body_end=scan_end,
body_indent=body_indent,
)
)
line_idx = scan_end
continue
if inline_match := RUN_INLINE_RE.match(line):
items.append(
InlineRun(
line_idx=line_idx,
prefix=inline_match.group("prefix"),
value=inline_match.group("value"),
)
)
line_idx += 1
return items
def find_md_bash_blocks(lines: list[str]) -> list[MdBashBlock]:
"""Return ``` ```bash ``` fenced code blocks in document order."""
blocks: list[MdBashBlock] = []
line_idx = 0
while line_idx < len(lines):
open_match = MD_BASH_OPEN_RE.match(lines[line_idx])
if not open_match:
line_idx += 1
continue
body_start = line_idx + 1
close_idx = next(
(
j
for j in range(body_start, len(lines))
if MD_FENCE_CLOSE_RE.match(lines[j])
),
None,
)
if close_idx is None:
line_idx = body_start
continue
body = lines[body_start:close_idx]
non_blank = [b for b in body if b.strip()]
body_indent = (
min(len(b) - len(b.lstrip(" ")) for b in non_blank)
if non_blank
else len(open_match.group("indent"))
)
blocks.append(
MdBashBlock(
open_line_idx=line_idx,
body_start=body_start,
body_end=close_idx,
body_indent=body_indent,
)
)
line_idx = close_idx + 1
return blocks
def dedent(lines: list[str], n: int) -> list[str]:
pad = " " * n
return [
(
""
if line.strip() == ""
else (line[n:] if line.startswith(pad) else line.lstrip(" "))
)
for line in lines
]
def reindent(lines: list[str], n: int) -> list[str]:
pad = " " * n
return [pad + line if line else "" for line in lines]
_SHFMT_ERR_RE = re.compile(r"\.sh:\d+:\d+:\s")
_GHA_EXPR_RE = re.compile(r"\$\{\{.*?\}\}", re.DOTALL)
_GHA_PLACEHOLDER_RE = re.compile(r"__GHA_EXPR_(\d+)__")
def _encode_gha_exprs(text: str) -> tuple[str, list[str]]:
"""Replace `${{ ... }}` expressions with bash-safe placeholder identifiers."""
exprs: list[str] = []
def repl(match: re.Match[str]) -> str:
exprs.append(match.group(0))
return f"__GHA_EXPR_{len(exprs) - 1}__"
return _GHA_EXPR_RE.sub(repl, text), exprs
def _decode_gha_exprs(text: str, exprs: list[str]) -> str:
"""Restore `${{ ... }}` expressions from placeholder identifiers."""
return _GHA_PLACEHOLDER_RE.sub(lambda m: exprs[int(m.group(1))], text)
def shfmt_via_hook(tmp_path: Path) -> tuple[bool, str]:
# `${{ ... }}` is not valid shell, so swap it for a placeholder identifier
# that shfmt can parse, then restore it after formatting.
encoded, exprs = _encode_gha_exprs(tmp_path.read_text())
if exprs:
tmp_path.write_text(encoded)
res = subprocess.run(
[_HOOK_RUNNER, "run", "shfmt", "--files", str(tmp_path)],
cwd=REPO,
capture_output=True,
text=True,
)
output = res.stdout + res.stderr
# shfmt emits parse errors as "<path>:<line>:<col>: <message>".
parse_err = bool(_SHFMT_ERR_RE.search(output))
# A non-zero exit that is neither a parse error nor pre-commit's "I had
# to modify files" signal means the hook itself failed to run (missing
# binary, install failure, bad config, ...). Surface that loudly rather
# than silently treating it as a no-op.
if (
res.returncode != 0
and not parse_err
and "files were modified by this hook" not in output
):
sys.exit(
f"error: `{_HOOK_RUNNER} run shfmt` failed with exit {res.returncode}:\n{output}"
)
if exprs and not parse_err:
tmp_path.write_text(_decode_gha_exprs(tmp_path.read_text(), exprs))
return not parse_err, output
def _skip(path: Path, where: int, kind: str, output: str) -> None:
print(
f" shfmt could not parse {kind} at {path}:{where + 1} — skipped",
file=sys.stderr,
)
print(f" {output.strip()}", file=sys.stderr)
def process_yaml_file(path: Path, tmp_path: Path) -> int:
text = path.read_text()
had_nl = text.endswith("\n")
lines = text.split("\n")
if had_nl:
lines = lines[:-1]
items = find_run_blocks(lines)
if not items:
return 0
changed = 0
# Process in reverse so earlier indices remain valid as we splice.
for item in reversed(items):
if isinstance(item, BlockRun):
body = lines[item.body_start : item.body_end]
tmp_path.write_text("\n".join(dedent(body, item.body_indent)) + "\n")
ok, output = shfmt_via_hook(tmp_path)
if not ok:
_skip(path, item.body_start, "block", output)
continue
formatted = tmp_path.read_text().rstrip("\n")
new_body = reindent(formatted.split("\n"), item.body_indent)
if new_body != body:
lines[item.body_start : item.body_end] = new_body
changed += 1
else:
tmp_path.write_text(item.value + "\n")
ok, output = shfmt_via_hook(tmp_path)
if not ok:
_skip(path, item.line_idx, "inline run", output)
continue
formatted = tmp_path.read_text().rstrip("\n")
if formatted == item.value:
continue
formatted_lines = formatted.split("\n")
if len(formatted_lines) == 1:
lines[item.line_idx] = f"{item.prefix}run: {formatted}"
else:
body_indent = len(item.prefix) + 2
lines[item.line_idx : item.line_idx + 1] = [
f"{item.prefix}run: |",
*reindent(formatted_lines, body_indent),
]
changed += 1
new_text = "\n".join(lines) + ("\n" if had_nl else "")
if new_text != text:
path.write_text(new_text)
return changed
def process_md_file(path: Path, tmp_path: Path) -> int:
text = path.read_text()
had_nl = text.endswith("\n")
lines = text.split("\n")
if had_nl:
lines = lines[:-1]
blocks = find_md_bash_blocks(lines)
if not blocks:
return 0
changed = 0
for block in reversed(blocks):
body = lines[block.body_start : block.body_end]
tmp_path.write_text("\n".join(dedent(body, block.body_indent)) + "\n")
ok, output = shfmt_via_hook(tmp_path)
if not ok:
_skip(path, block.open_line_idx, "```bash block", output)
continue
formatted = tmp_path.read_text().rstrip("\n")
formatted_lines = formatted.split("\n") if formatted else []
new_body = reindent(formatted_lines, block.body_indent)
if new_body != body:
lines[block.body_start : block.body_end] = new_body
changed += 1
new_text = "\n".join(lines) + ("\n" if had_nl else "")
if new_text != text:
path.write_text(new_text)
return changed
def process_file(path: Path, tmp_path: Path) -> int:
if path.suffix in (".yml", ".yaml"):
return process_yaml_file(path, tmp_path)
if path.suffix == ".md":
return process_md_file(path, tmp_path)
return 0
def gather_files(argv: list[str]) -> list[Path]:
"""Return YAML workflow/action files and markdown files that we should
process — either the paths in `argv` or, when `argv` is empty, every
such file in the repo (skipping `external/`)."""
if argv:
candidates: list[Path] = [
(REPO / a).resolve() if not Path(a).is_absolute() else Path(a) for a in argv
]
else:
gh = REPO / ".github"
candidates = [
*gh.rglob("*.yml"),
*gh.rglob("*.yaml"),
*(
p
for p in REPO.rglob("*.md")
if "external" not in p.relative_to(REPO).parts
),
]
return sorted(
p
for p in candidates
if p.exists()
and (
(p.suffix in (".yml", ".yaml") and ".github" in p.parts)
or p.suffix == ".md"
)
)
def main(argv: list[str]) -> int:
files = gather_files(argv)
if not files:
return 0
with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory(prefix="format-inline-bash-") as tmpdir:
tmp_path = Path(tmpdir) / "shfmt.sh"
total = 0
for f in files:
n = process_file(f, tmp_path)
if n:
print(f"{f.relative_to(REPO)}: reformatted {n} block(s)")
total += n
return 1 if total else 0
if __name__ == "__main__":
sys.exit(main(sys.argv[1:]))

0
.github/scripts/levelization/generate.py vendored Executable file → Normal file
View File

View File

@@ -4,9 +4,6 @@ Loop: test.jtx test.toplevel
Loop: test.jtx test.unit_test
test.unit_test ~= test.jtx
Loop: xrpl.telemetry xrpld.rpc
xrpld.rpc > xrpl.telemetry
Loop: xrpld.app xrpld.overlay
xrpld.app > xrpld.overlay
@@ -19,9 +16,6 @@ Loop: xrpld.app xrpld.rpc
Loop: xrpld.app xrpld.shamap
xrpld.shamap > xrpld.app
Loop: xrpld.app xrpld.telemetry
xrpld.telemetry ~= xrpld.app
Loop: xrpld.overlay xrpld.rpc
xrpld.rpc ~= xrpld.overlay

View File

@@ -41,8 +41,6 @@ libxrpl.shamap > xrpl.basics
libxrpl.shamap > xrpl.nodestore
libxrpl.shamap > xrpl.protocol
libxrpl.shamap > xrpl.shamap
libxrpl.telemetry > xrpl.basics
libxrpl.telemetry > xrpl.telemetry
libxrpl.tx > xrpl.basics
libxrpl.tx > xrpl.conditions
libxrpl.tx > xrpl.core
@@ -50,7 +48,6 @@ libxrpl.tx > xrpl.json
libxrpl.tx > xrpl.ledger
libxrpl.tx > xrpl.protocol
libxrpl.tx > xrpl.server
libxrpl.tx > xrpl.telemetry
libxrpl.tx > xrpl.tx
test.app > test.jtx
test.app > test.unit_test
@@ -200,7 +197,6 @@ tests.libxrpl > xrpl.protocol
tests.libxrpl > xrpl.protocol_autogen
tests.libxrpl > xrpl.server
tests.libxrpl > xrpl.shamap
tests.libxrpl > xrpl.telemetry
tests.libxrpl > xrpl.tx
xrpl.conditions > xrpl.basics
xrpl.conditions > xrpl.protocol
@@ -235,12 +231,10 @@ xrpl.server > xrpl.shamap
xrpl.shamap > xrpl.basics
xrpl.shamap > xrpl.nodestore
xrpl.shamap > xrpl.protocol
xrpl.telemetry > xrpl.basics
xrpl.tx > xrpl.basics
xrpl.tx > xrpl.core
xrpl.tx > xrpl.ledger
xrpl.tx > xrpl.protocol
xrpl.tx > xrpl.telemetry
xrpld.app > test.unit_test
xrpld.app > xrpl.basics
xrpld.app > xrpl.core
@@ -255,7 +249,6 @@ xrpld.app > xrpl.rdb
xrpld.app > xrpl.resource
xrpld.app > xrpl.server
xrpld.app > xrpl.shamap
xrpld.app > xrpl.telemetry
xrpld.app > xrpl.tx
xrpld.consensus > xrpl.basics
xrpld.consensus > xrpl.json
@@ -271,14 +264,12 @@ xrpld.overlay > xrpl.core
xrpld.overlay > xrpld.consensus
xrpld.overlay > xrpld.core
xrpld.overlay > xrpld.peerfinder
xrpld.overlay > xrpld.telemetry
xrpld.overlay > xrpl.json
xrpld.overlay > xrpl.ledger
xrpld.overlay > xrpl.protocol
xrpld.overlay > xrpl.resource
xrpld.overlay > xrpl.server
xrpld.overlay > xrpl.shamap
xrpld.overlay > xrpl.telemetry
xrpld.overlay > xrpl.tx
xrpld.peerfinder > xrpl.basics
xrpld.peerfinder > xrpld.core
@@ -306,5 +297,3 @@ xrpld.shamap > xrpl.basics
xrpld.shamap > xrpld.core
xrpld.shamap > xrpl.protocol
xrpld.shamap > xrpl.shamap
xrpld.telemetry > xrpl.basics
xrpld.telemetry > xrpl.telemetry

View File

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ set -e
# On MacOS, ensure that GNU sed is installed and available as `gsed`.
SED_COMMAND=sed
if [[ "${OSTYPE}" == 'darwin'* ]]; then
if ! command -v gsed &>/dev/null; then
if ! command -v gsed &> /dev/null; then
echo "Error: gsed is not installed. Please install it using 'brew install gnu-sed'."
exit 1
fi

View File

@@ -8,12 +8,12 @@ set -e
SED_COMMAND=sed
HEAD_COMMAND=head
if [[ "${OSTYPE}" == 'darwin'* ]]; then
if ! command -v gsed &>/dev/null; then
if ! command -v gsed &> /dev/null; then
echo "Error: gsed is not installed. Please install it using 'brew install gnu-sed'."
exit 1
fi
SED_COMMAND=gsed
if ! command -v ghead &>/dev/null; then
if ! command -v ghead &> /dev/null; then
echo "Error: ghead is not installed. Please install it using 'brew install coreutils'."
exit 1
fi
@@ -74,10 +74,10 @@ if grep -q '"xrpld"' cmake/XrplCore.cmake; then
# The script has been rerun, so just restore the name of the binary.
${SED_COMMAND} -i 's/"xrpld"/"rippled"/' cmake/XrplCore.cmake
elif ! grep -q '"rippled"' cmake/XrplCore.cmake; then
${HEAD_COMMAND} -n -1 cmake/XrplCore.cmake >cmake.tmp
echo ' # For the time being, we will keep the name of the binary as it was.' >>cmake.tmp
echo ' set_target_properties(xrpld PROPERTIES OUTPUT_NAME "rippled")' >>cmake.tmp
tail -1 cmake/XrplCore.cmake >>cmake.tmp
${HEAD_COMMAND} -n -1 cmake/XrplCore.cmake > cmake.tmp
echo ' # For the time being, we will keep the name of the binary as it was.' >> cmake.tmp
echo ' set_target_properties(xrpld PROPERTIES OUTPUT_NAME "rippled")' >> cmake.tmp
tail -1 cmake/XrplCore.cmake >> cmake.tmp
mv cmake.tmp cmake/XrplCore.cmake
fi

View File

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ set -e
# On MacOS, ensure that GNU sed is installed and available as `gsed`.
SED_COMMAND=sed
if [[ "${OSTYPE}" == 'darwin'* ]]; then
if ! command -v gsed &>/dev/null; then
if ! command -v gsed &> /dev/null; then
echo "Error: gsed is not installed. Please install it using 'brew install gnu-sed'."
exit 1
fi
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ ${SED_COMMAND} -i 's@ripple/@xrpld/@g' src/test/core/Config_test.cpp
${SED_COMMAND} -i 's/Rippled/File/g' src/test/core/Config_test.cpp
# Restore the old config file name in the code that maintains support for now.
${SED_COMMAND} -i 's/kConfigLegacyName = "xrpld.cfg"/kConfigLegacyName = "rippled.cfg"/g' src/xrpld/core/detail/Config.cpp
${SED_COMMAND} -i 's/kCONFIG_LEGACY_NAME = "xrpld.cfg"/kCONFIG_LEGACY_NAME = "rippled.cfg"/g' src/xrpld/core/detail/Config.cpp
# Restore an URL.
${SED_COMMAND} -i 's/connect-your-xrpld-to-the-xrp-test-net.html/connect-your-rippled-to-the-xrp-test-net.html/g' cfg/xrpld-example.cfg

View File

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ set -e
# On MacOS, ensure that GNU sed is installed and available as `gsed`.
SED_COMMAND=sed
if [[ "${OSTYPE}" == 'darwin'* ]]; then
if ! command -v gsed &>/dev/null; then
if ! command -v gsed &> /dev/null; then
echo "Error: gsed is not installed. Please install it using 'brew install gnu-sed'."
exit 1
fi
@@ -62,37 +62,37 @@ done
# restoring the verbiage that is already present in LICENSE.md. Ensure that if
# the script is run multiple times, duplicate notices are not added.
if ! grep -q 'Raw Material Software' include/xrpl/beast/core/CurrentThreadName.h; then
echo -e "// Portions of this file are from JUCE (http://www.juce.com).\n// Copyright (c) 2013 - Raw Material Software Ltd.\n// Please visit http://www.juce.com\n\n$(cat include/xrpl/beast/core/CurrentThreadName.h)" >include/xrpl/beast/core/CurrentThreadName.h
echo -e "// Portions of this file are from JUCE (http://www.juce.com).\n// Copyright (c) 2013 - Raw Material Software Ltd.\n// Please visit http://www.juce.com\n\n$(cat include/xrpl/beast/core/CurrentThreadName.h)" > include/xrpl/beast/core/CurrentThreadName.h
fi
if ! grep -q 'Dev Null' src/test/app/NetworkID_test.cpp; then
echo -e "// Copyright (c) 2020 Dev Null Productions\n\n$(cat src/test/app/NetworkID_test.cpp)" >src/test/app/NetworkID_test.cpp
echo -e "// Copyright (c) 2020 Dev Null Productions\n\n$(cat src/test/app/NetworkID_test.cpp)" > src/test/app/NetworkID_test.cpp
fi
if ! grep -q 'Dev Null' src/test/app/tx/apply_test.cpp; then
echo -e "// Copyright (c) 2020 Dev Null Productions\n\n$(cat src/test/app/tx/apply_test.cpp)" >src/test/app/tx/apply_test.cpp
echo -e "// Copyright (c) 2020 Dev Null Productions\n\n$(cat src/test/app/tx/apply_test.cpp)" > src/test/app/tx/apply_test.cpp
fi
if ! grep -q 'Dev Null' src/test/rpc/ManifestRPC_test.cpp; then
echo -e "// Copyright (c) 2020 Dev Null Productions\n\n$(cat src/test/rpc/ManifestRPC_test.cpp)" >src/test/rpc/ManifestRPC_test.cpp
echo -e "// Copyright (c) 2020 Dev Null Productions\n\n$(cat src/test/rpc/ManifestRPC_test.cpp)" > src/test/rpc/ManifestRPC_test.cpp
fi
if ! grep -q 'Dev Null' src/test/rpc/ValidatorInfo_test.cpp; then
echo -e "// Copyright (c) 2020 Dev Null Productions\n\n$(cat src/test/rpc/ValidatorInfo_test.cpp)" >src/test/rpc/ValidatorInfo_test.cpp
echo -e "// Copyright (c) 2020 Dev Null Productions\n\n$(cat src/test/rpc/ValidatorInfo_test.cpp)" > src/test/rpc/ValidatorInfo_test.cpp
fi
if ! grep -q 'Dev Null' src/xrpld/rpc/handlers/server_info/Manifest.cpp; then
echo -e "// Copyright (c) 2019 Dev Null Productions\n\n$(cat src/xrpld/rpc/handlers/server_info/Manifest.cpp)" >src/xrpld/rpc/handlers/server_info/Manifest.cpp
echo -e "// Copyright (c) 2019 Dev Null Productions\n\n$(cat src/xrpld/rpc/handlers/server_info/Manifest.cpp)" > src/xrpld/rpc/handlers/server_info/Manifest.cpp
fi
if ! grep -q 'Dev Null' src/xrpld/rpc/handlers/admin/status/ValidatorInfo.cpp; then
echo -e "// Copyright (c) 2019 Dev Null Productions\n\n$(cat src/xrpld/rpc/handlers/admin/status/ValidatorInfo.cpp)" >src/xrpld/rpc/handlers/admin/status/ValidatorInfo.cpp
echo -e "// Copyright (c) 2019 Dev Null Productions\n\n$(cat src/xrpld/rpc/handlers/admin/status/ValidatorInfo.cpp)" > src/xrpld/rpc/handlers/admin/status/ValidatorInfo.cpp
fi
if ! grep -q 'Bougalis' include/xrpl/basics/SlabAllocator.h; then
echo -e "// Copyright (c) 2022, Nikolaos D. Bougalis <nikb@bougalis.net>\n\n$(cat include/xrpl/basics/SlabAllocator.h)" >include/xrpl/basics/SlabAllocator.h # cspell: ignore Nikolaos Bougalis nikb
echo -e "// Copyright (c) 2022, Nikolaos D. Bougalis <nikb@bougalis.net>\n\n$(cat include/xrpl/basics/SlabAllocator.h)" > include/xrpl/basics/SlabAllocator.h # cspell: ignore Nikolaos Bougalis nikb
fi
if ! grep -q 'Bougalis' include/xrpl/basics/spinlock.h; then
echo -e "// Copyright (c) 2022, Nikolaos D. Bougalis <nikb@bougalis.net>\n\n$(cat include/xrpl/basics/spinlock.h)" >include/xrpl/basics/spinlock.h # cspell: ignore Nikolaos Bougalis nikb
echo -e "// Copyright (c) 2022, Nikolaos D. Bougalis <nikb@bougalis.net>\n\n$(cat include/xrpl/basics/spinlock.h)" > include/xrpl/basics/spinlock.h # cspell: ignore Nikolaos Bougalis nikb
fi
if ! grep -q 'Bougalis' include/xrpl/basics/tagged_integer.h; then
echo -e "// Copyright (c) 2014, Nikolaos D. Bougalis <nikb@bougalis.net>\n\n$(cat include/xrpl/basics/tagged_integer.h)" >include/xrpl/basics/tagged_integer.h # cspell: ignore Nikolaos Bougalis nikb
echo -e "// Copyright (c) 2014, Nikolaos D. Bougalis <nikb@bougalis.net>\n\n$(cat include/xrpl/basics/tagged_integer.h)" > include/xrpl/basics/tagged_integer.h # cspell: ignore Nikolaos Bougalis nikb
fi
if ! grep -q 'Ritchford' include/xrpl/beast/utility/Zero.h; then
echo -e "// Copyright (c) 2014, Tom Ritchford <tom@swirly.com>\n\n$(cat include/xrpl/beast/utility/Zero.h)" >include/xrpl/beast/utility/Zero.h # cspell: ignore Ritchford
echo -e "// Copyright (c) 2014, Tom Ritchford <tom@swirly.com>\n\n$(cat include/xrpl/beast/utility/Zero.h)" > include/xrpl/beast/utility/Zero.h # cspell: ignore Ritchford
fi
# Restore newlines and tabs in string literals in the affected file.

View File

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ set -e
# On MacOS, ensure that GNU sed is installed and available as `gsed`.
SED_COMMAND=sed
if [[ "${OSTYPE}" == 'darwin'* ]]; then
if ! command -v gsed &>/dev/null; then
if ! command -v gsed &> /dev/null; then
echo "Error: gsed is not installed. Please install it using 'brew install gnu-sed'."
exit 1
fi

View File

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ set -e
# On MacOS, ensure that GNU sed is installed and available as `gsed`.
SED_COMMAND=sed
if [[ "${OSTYPE}" == 'darwin'* ]]; then
if ! command -v gsed &>/dev/null; then
if ! command -v gsed &> /dev/null; then
echo "Error: gsed is not installed. Please install it using 'brew install gnu-sed'."
exit 1
fi
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ ${SED_COMMAND} -i 's/www.ripple.com/www.xrpl.org/g' src/test/protocol/Seed_test.
# Restore specific changes.
${SED_COMMAND} -i 's@b5efcc/src/xrpld@b5efcc/src/ripple@' include/xrpl/protocol/README.md
${SED_COMMAND} -i 's/dbPrefix_ = "xrpldb"/dbPrefix_ = "rippledb"/' src/xrpld/app/misc/SHAMapStoreImp.h # cspell: disable-line
${SED_COMMAND} -i 's/kConfigLegacyName = "xrpld.cfg"/kConfigLegacyName = "rippled.cfg"/' src/xrpld/core/detail/Config.cpp
${SED_COMMAND} -i 's/kCONFIG_LEGACY_NAME = "xrpld.cfg"/kCONFIG_LEGACY_NAME = "rippled.cfg"/' src/xrpld/core/detail/Config.cpp
popd
echo "Renaming complete."

View File

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ set -e
# On MacOS, ensure that GNU sed is installed and available as `gsed`.
SED_COMMAND=sed
if [[ "${OSTYPE}" == 'darwin'* ]]; then
if ! command -v gsed &>/dev/null; then
if ! command -v gsed &> /dev/null; then
echo "Error: gsed is not installed. Please install it using 'brew install gnu-sed'."
exit 1
fi

View File

@@ -32,32 +32,7 @@ We will further set additional CMake arguments as follows:
"""
def build_config_name(os_entry: dict[str, str], platform: str, build_type: str) -> str:
parts = [os_entry["distro_name"]]
for key in ("distro_version", "compiler_name", "compiler_version"):
if value := os_entry[key]:
parts.append(value)
parts.append("arm64" if "arm64" in platform else "amd64")
parts.append(build_type.lower())
return "-".join(parts)
def generate_packaging_matrix(config: Config) -> list[dict]:
"""Emit one entry per os entry with `package: true`. Architecture is
hardcoded to linux/amd64 here (and the runner is hardcoded at the
workflow level) until arm64 packaging is ready.
"""
return [
{
"artifact_name": f"xrpld-{build_config_name(os, 'linux/amd64', 'Release')}",
"os": os,
}
for os in config.os
if os.get("package", False)
]
def generate_strategy_matrix(all: bool, config: Config) -> list[dict]:
def generate_strategy_matrix(all: bool, config: Config) -> list:
configurations = []
for architecture, os, build_type, cmake_args in itertools.product(
config.architecture, config.os, config.build_type, config.cmake_args
@@ -126,15 +101,14 @@ def generate_strategy_matrix(all: bool, config: Config) -> list[dict]:
continue
# RHEL:
# - 9 using GCC 12: Debug and Release on linux/amd64
# (Release is required for RPM packaging).
# - 9 using GCC 12: Debug on linux/amd64.
# - 10 using Clang: Release on linux/amd64.
if os["distro_name"] == "rhel":
skip = True
if os["distro_version"] == "9":
if (
f"{os['compiler_name']}-{os['compiler_version']}" == "gcc-12"
and build_type in ["Debug", "Release"]
and build_type == "Debug"
and architecture["platform"] == "linux/amd64"
):
skip = False
@@ -149,8 +123,7 @@ def generate_strategy_matrix(all: bool, config: Config) -> list[dict]:
continue
# Ubuntu:
# - Jammy using GCC 12: Debug on linux/arm64, Release on
# linux/amd64 (Release is required for DEB packaging).
# - Jammy using GCC 12: Debug on linux/arm64.
# - Noble using GCC 14: Release on linux/amd64.
# - Noble using Clang 18: Debug on linux/amd64.
# - Noble using Clang 19: Release on linux/arm64.
@@ -163,12 +136,6 @@ def generate_strategy_matrix(all: bool, config: Config) -> list[dict]:
and architecture["platform"] == "linux/arm64"
):
skip = False
if (
f"{os['compiler_name']}-{os['compiler_version']}" == "gcc-12"
and build_type == "Release"
and architecture["platform"] == "linux/amd64"
):
skip = False
elif os["distro_version"] == "noble":
if (
f"{os['compiler_name']}-{os['compiler_version']}" == "gcc-14"
@@ -251,7 +218,17 @@ def generate_strategy_matrix(all: bool, config: Config) -> list[dict]:
# Generate a unique name for the configuration, e.g. macos-arm64-debug
# or debian-bookworm-gcc-12-amd64-release.
config_name = build_config_name(os, architecture["platform"], build_type)
config_name = os["distro_name"]
if (n := os["distro_version"]) != "":
config_name += f"-{n}"
if (n := os["compiler_name"]) != "":
config_name += f"-{n}"
if (n := os["compiler_version"]) != "":
config_name += f"-{n}"
config_name += (
f"-{architecture['platform'][architecture['platform'].find('/')+1:]}"
)
config_name += f"-{build_type.lower()}"
if "-Dcoverage=ON" in cmake_args:
config_name += "-coverage"
if "-Dunity=ON" in cmake_args:
@@ -355,19 +332,10 @@ if __name__ == "__main__":
required=False,
type=Path,
)
parser.add_argument(
"-p",
"--packaging",
help="Emit the packaging matrix (derived from the 'package' field on os entries) instead of the build/test matrix.",
action="store_true",
)
args = parser.parse_args()
matrix = []
if args.packaging:
config_path = args.config if args.config else THIS_DIR / "linux.json"
matrix += generate_packaging_matrix(read_config(config_path))
elif args.config is None or args.config == "":
if args.config is None or args.config == "":
matrix += generate_strategy_matrix(
args.all, read_config(THIS_DIR / "linux.json")
)

View File

@@ -127,8 +127,7 @@
"distro_version": "9",
"compiler_name": "gcc",
"compiler_version": "12",
"image_sha": "4c086b9",
"package": true
"image_sha": "4c086b9"
},
{
"distro_name": "rhel",
@@ -170,8 +169,7 @@
"distro_version": "jammy",
"compiler_name": "gcc",
"compiler_version": "12",
"image_sha": "4c086b9",
"package": true
"image_sha": "4c086b9"
},
{
"distro_name": "ubuntu",

View File

@@ -6,16 +6,14 @@ on:
- develop
paths:
- ".github/workflows/build-nix-image.yml"
- ".github/workflows/reusable-build-docker-image.yml"
- "docker/**"
- "docker/nix.Dockerfile"
- "flake.nix"
- "flake.lock"
- "nix/**"
pull_request:
paths:
- ".github/workflows/build-nix-image.yml"
- ".github/workflows/reusable-build-docker-image.yml"
- "docker/**"
- "docker/nix.Dockerfile"
- "flake.nix"
- "flake.lock"
- "nix/**"
@@ -29,81 +27,75 @@ defaults:
run:
shell: bash
env:
UBUNTU_VERSION: "20.04"
RHEL_VERSION: "9"
DEBIAN_VERSION: "bookworm"
jobs:
build:
name: Build ${{ matrix.distro.name }} (${{ matrix.target.platform }})
permissions:
contents: read
packages: write
strategy:
fail-fast: false
matrix:
# The base images are the oldest supported version of each distro
# that we want to build images for.
distro:
- name: nixos
base_image: nixos/nix:latest
- name: ubuntu
base_image: ubuntu:20.04
- name: rhel
base_image: registry.access.redhat.com/ubi9/ubi:latest
- name: debian
base_image: debian:bookworm
target:
- platform: linux/amd64
runner: ubuntu-latest
- platform: linux/arm64
runner: ubuntu-24.04-arm
uses: ./.github/workflows/reusable-build-docker-image.yml
with:
image_name: ghcr.io/xrplf/xrpld/nix-${{ matrix.distro.name }}
dockerfile: docker/nix.Dockerfile
base_image: ${{ matrix.distro.base_image }}
platform: ${{ matrix.target.platform }}
runner: ${{ matrix.target.runner }}
push: ${{ github.repository == 'XRPLF/rippled' && github.event_name == 'push' }}
merge:
name: Merge ${{ matrix.distro }} manifest
needs: build
if: ${{ github.repository == 'XRPLF/rippled' && github.event_name == 'push' }}
name: Build and push Nix image (${{ matrix.distro }})
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
permissions:
contents: read
packages: write
strategy:
fail-fast: false
matrix:
distro: [nixos, ubuntu, rhel, debian]
env:
IMAGE_NAME: ghcr.io/xrplf/xrpld/nix-${{ matrix.distro }}
include:
- distro: nixos
- distro: ubuntu
- distro: rhel
- distro: debian
steps:
- name: Set up Docker Buildx
uses: docker/setup-buildx-action@d7f5e7f509e45cec5c76c4d5afdd7de93d0b3df5 # v4.1.0
- name: Checkout repository
uses: actions/checkout@de0fac2e4500dabe0009e67214ff5f5447ce83dd # v6.0.2
- name: Docker metadata
id: meta
uses: docker/metadata-action@80c7e94dd9b9319bd5eb7a0e0fe9291e23a2a2e9 # v6.1.0
with:
images: ${{ env.IMAGE_NAME }}
tags: |
type=sha,prefix=sha-,format=short
type=raw,value=latest
- name: Determine base image
id: vars
run: |
case "${{ matrix.distro }}" in
nixos)
echo "base_image=nixos/nix:latest" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
;;
ubuntu)
echo "base_image=ubuntu:${UBUNTU_VERSION}" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
;;
rhel)
echo "base_image=registry.access.redhat.com/ubi${RHEL_VERSION}/ubi:latest" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
;;
debian)
echo "base_image=debian:${DEBIAN_VERSION}" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
;;
esac
- name: Set up Docker Buildx
uses: docker/setup-buildx-action@4d04d5d9486b7bd6fa91e7baf45bbb4f8b9deedd # v4.0.0
- name: Login to GitHub Container Registry
uses: docker/login-action@650006c6eb7dba73a995cc03b0b2d7f5ca915bee # v4.2.0
if: github.event_name == 'push'
uses: docker/login-action@4907a6ddec9925e35a0a9e82d7399ccc52663121 # v4.1.0
with:
registry: ghcr.io
username: ${{ github.repository_owner }}
password: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
- name: Create multi-arch manifests
run: |
for tag in $(jq -cr '.tags[]' <<<"$DOCKER_METADATA_OUTPUT_JSON"); do
docker buildx imagetools create -t "$tag" "${tag}-amd64" "${tag}-arm64"
done
- name: Docker metadata
id: meta
uses: docker/metadata-action@030e881283bb7a6894de51c315a6bfe6a94e05cf # v6.0.0
with:
images: ghcr.io/xrplf/ci/nix-${{ matrix.distro }}
tags: |
type=sha,prefix=sha-,format=short
type=raw,value=latest
- name: Inspect image
run: |
docker buildx imagetools inspect "${IMAGE_NAME}:${{ steps.meta.outputs.version }}"
- name: Build and push
uses: docker/build-push-action@bcafcacb16a39f128d818304e6c9c0c18556b85f # v7.1.0
with:
context: .
file: docker/nix.Dockerfile
platforms: linux/amd64
push: ${{ github.event_name == 'push' }}
tags: ${{ steps.meta.outputs.tags }}
labels: ${{ steps.meta.outputs.labels }}
build-args: BASE_IMAGE=${{ steps.vars.outputs.base_image }}

View File

@@ -5,17 +5,8 @@ on:
types:
- checks_requested
pull_request:
types:
- opened
- edited
- reopened
- synchronize
- ready_for_review
branches:
- develop
- "release-*"
- "release/*"
- "staging/*"
types: [opened, edited, reopened, synchronize, ready_for_review]
branches: [develop]
jobs:
check_description:
@@ -29,11 +20,11 @@ jobs:
env:
PR_BODY: ${{ github.event.pull_request.body }}
if: ${{ github.event_name == 'pull_request' }}
run: printenv PR_BODY >pr_body.md
run: printenv PR_BODY > pr_body.md
- name: Check PR description differs from template
if: ${{ github.event_name == 'pull_request' }}
run: |
python .github/scripts/check-pr-description.py \
--template-file .github/pull_request_template.md \
--pr-body-file pr_body.md
run: >
python .github/scripts/check-pr-description.py
--template-file .github/pull_request_template.md
--pr-body-file pr_body.md

View File

@@ -5,19 +5,10 @@ on:
types:
- checks_requested
pull_request:
types:
- opened
- edited
- reopened
- synchronize
- ready_for_review
branches:
- develop
- "release-*"
- "release/*"
- "staging/*"
types: [opened, edited, reopened, synchronize, ready_for_review]
branches: [develop]
jobs:
check_title:
if: ${{ github.event.pull_request.draft != true }}
uses: XRPLF/actions/.github/workflows/check-pr-title.yml@cba1f0891650baf1a9c88624dc2d72573be2eb81
uses: XRPLF/actions/.github/workflows/check-pr-title.yml@a5d8dd35be543365e90a11358447130c8763871d

90
.github/workflows/doc-review.yml vendored Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
name: Documentation Review
on:
pull_request:
types: [opened, synchronize, reopened]
paths:
- 'include/**/*.h'
- 'src/libxrpl/**/*.h'
- 'src/libxrpl/**/*.cpp'
- 'src/xrpld/**/*.h'
- 'src/xrpld/**/*.cpp'
concurrency:
group: doc-review-${{ github.ref }}
cancel-in-progress: true
defaults:
run:
shell: bash
jobs:
review:
if: github.head_ref != 'dangell7/docs'
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
permissions:
pull-requests: write
contents: read
steps:
- name: Checkout repository
uses: actions/checkout@de0fac2e4500dabe0009e67214ff5f5447ce83dd # v6.0.2
with:
fetch-depth: 0
- name: Set up Node.js
uses: actions/setup-node@49933ea5288caeca8642d1e84afbd3f7d6820020 # v4.4.0
with:
node-version: '20'
cache: 'npm'
cache-dependency-path: .github/scripts/doc-agent/package-lock.json
- name: Install doc-agent dependencies
working-directory: .github/scripts/doc-agent
run: npm ci
- name: Run documentation review
env:
ANTHROPIC_API_KEY: ${{ secrets.ANTHROPIC_API_KEY }}
run: |
cd .github/scripts/doc-agent
npm run review -- "${{ github.event.pull_request.base.sha }}..${{ github.event.pull_request.head.sha }}"
- name: Post review summary
if: always()
uses: marocchino/sticky-pull-request-comment@67d0dec7b07ed060a405f9b2a64b8ab319fdd7db # v2.9.2
with:
header: doc-review
path: .github/scripts/doc-agent/doc-review-report.md
- name: Post inline review comments
if: always()
uses: actions/github-script@60a0d83039c74a4aee543508d2ffcb1c3799cdea # v7.0.1
with:
script: |
const fs = require('fs');
const path = '.github/scripts/doc-agent/doc-review-comments.json';
if (!fs.existsSync(path)) return;
const comments = JSON.parse(fs.readFileSync(path, 'utf8'));
if (comments.length === 0) return;
const pull_number = context.payload.pull_request.number;
const owner = context.repo.owner;
const repo = context.repo.repo;
for (const comment of comments) {
try {
await github.rest.pulls.createReviewComment({
owner,
repo,
pull_number,
body: comment.body,
commit_id: '${{ github.event.pull_request.head.sha }}',
path: comment.path,
line: comment.line,
side: 'RIGHT',
});
} catch (e) {
console.log(`Failed to post comment on ${comment.path}:${comment.line}: ${e.message}`);
}
}

View File

@@ -64,13 +64,11 @@ jobs:
.github/workflows/reusable-build-test-config.yml
.github/workflows/reusable-build-test.yml
.github/workflows/reusable-clang-tidy.yml
.github/workflows/reusable-package.yml
.github/workflows/reusable-strategy-matrix.yml
.github/workflows/reusable-test.yml
.github/workflows/reusable-upload-recipe.yml
.clang-tidy
.codecov.yml
cfg/**
cmake/**
conan/**
external/**
@@ -80,10 +78,6 @@ jobs:
CMakeLists.txt
conanfile.py
conan.lock
LICENSE.md
package/**
README.md
- name: Check whether to run
# This step determines whether the rest of the workflow should
# run. The rest of the workflow will run if this job runs AND at
@@ -98,7 +92,7 @@ jobs:
READY: ${{ contains(github.event.pull_request.labels.*.name, 'Ready to merge') }}
MERGE: ${{ github.event_name == 'merge_group' }}
run: |
echo "go=${{ (env.DRAFT != 'true' && env.READY == 'true') || env.FILES == 'true' || env.MERGE == 'true' }}" >>"${GITHUB_OUTPUT}"
echo "go=${{ (env.DRAFT != 'true' && env.READY == 'true') || env.FILES == 'true' || env.MERGE == 'true' }}" >> "${GITHUB_OUTPUT}"
cat "${GITHUB_OUTPUT}"
outputs:
go: ${{ steps.go.outputs.go == 'true' }}
@@ -140,11 +134,6 @@ jobs:
secrets:
CODECOV_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.CODECOV_TOKEN }}
package:
needs: [should-run, build-test]
if: ${{ needs.should-run.outputs.go == 'true' }}
uses: ./.github/workflows/reusable-package.yml
upload-recipe:
needs:
- should-run
@@ -168,9 +157,9 @@ jobs:
PR_URL: ${{ github.event.pull_request.html_url }}
run: |
gh api --method POST -H "Accept: application/vnd.github+json" -H "X-GitHub-Api-Version: 2022-11-28" \
/repos/xrplf/clio/dispatches -f "event_type=check_libxrpl" \
-F "client_payload[ref]=${{ needs.upload-recipe.outputs.recipe_ref }}" \
-F "client_payload[pr_url]=${PR_URL}"
/repos/xrplf/clio/dispatches -f "event_type=check_libxrpl" \
-F "client_payload[ref]=${{ needs.upload-recipe.outputs.recipe_ref }}" \
-F "client_payload[pr_url]=${PR_URL}"
passed:
if: failure() || cancelled()
@@ -179,7 +168,6 @@ jobs:
- check-rename
- clang-tidy
- build-test
- package
- upload-recipe
- notify-clio
runs-on: ubuntu-latest

View File

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
# This workflow uploads the libxrpl recipe to the Conan remote and builds
# release packages when a versioned tag is pushed.
# This workflow uploads the libxrpl recipe to the Conan remote when a versioned
# tag is pushed.
name: Tag
on:
@@ -22,22 +22,3 @@ jobs:
secrets:
remote_username: ${{ secrets.CONAN_REMOTE_USERNAME }}
remote_password: ${{ secrets.CONAN_REMOTE_PASSWORD }}
build-test:
if: ${{ github.repository == 'XRPLF/rippled' }}
uses: ./.github/workflows/reusable-build-test.yml
strategy:
fail-fast: true
matrix:
os: [linux]
with:
ccache_enabled: false
os: ${{ matrix.os }}
strategy_matrix: minimal
secrets:
CODECOV_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.CODECOV_TOKEN }}
package:
if: ${{ github.repository == 'XRPLF/rippled' }}
needs: build-test
uses: ./.github/workflows/reusable-package.yml

View File

@@ -21,13 +21,11 @@ on:
- ".github/workflows/reusable-build-test-config.yml"
- ".github/workflows/reusable-build-test.yml"
- ".github/workflows/reusable-clang-tidy.yml"
- ".github/workflows/reusable-package.yml"
- ".github/workflows/reusable-strategy-matrix.yml"
- ".github/workflows/reusable-test.yml"
- ".github/workflows/reusable-upload-recipe.yml"
- ".clang-tidy"
- ".codecov.yml"
- "cfg/**"
- "cmake/**"
- "conan/**"
- "external/**"
@@ -37,9 +35,6 @@ on:
- "CMakeLists.txt"
- "conanfile.py"
- "conan.lock"
- "LICENSE.md"
- "package/**"
- "README.md"
# Run at 06:32 UTC on every day of the week from Monday through Friday. This
# will force all dependencies to be rebuilt, which is useful to verify that
@@ -100,7 +95,3 @@ jobs:
secrets:
remote_username: ${{ secrets.CONAN_REMOTE_USERNAME }}
remote_password: ${{ secrets.CONAN_REMOTE_PASSWORD }}
package:
needs: build-test
uses: ./.github/workflows/reusable-package.yml

View File

@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ on:
jobs:
# Call the workflow in the XRPLF/actions repo that runs the pre-commit hooks.
run-hooks:
uses: XRPLF/actions/.github/workflows/pre-commit.yml@cba1f0891650baf1a9c88624dc2d72573be2eb81
uses: XRPLF/actions/.github/workflows/pre-commit.yml@5e942d61bf32f7557a7c159cfac4712a687b3e3a
with:
runs_on: ubuntu-latest
container: '{ "image": "ghcr.io/xrplf/ci/tools-rippled-pre-commit:sha-41ec7c1" }'

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
# This workflow builds the documentation for the repository, and publishes it to
# GitHub Pages when changes are merged into the default branch.
name: Build and publish documentation
# Builds Doxygen XML + HTML in a single pass, runs documentation coverage
# checks on pull requests, and publishes the HTML to GitHub Pages when changes
# land on `develop`.
name: Documentation (build, coverage, publish)
on:
push:
@@ -8,6 +9,8 @@ on:
- "develop"
paths:
- ".github/workflows/publish-docs.yml"
- ".github/doc-coverage-thresholds.json"
- ".github/scripts/doc-coverage-check.py"
- "*.md"
- "**/*.md"
- "docs/**"
@@ -17,6 +20,8 @@ on:
pull_request:
paths:
- ".github/workflows/publish-docs.yml"
- ".github/doc-coverage-thresholds.json"
- ".github/scripts/doc-coverage-check.py"
- "*.md"
- "**/*.md"
- "docs/**"
@@ -42,9 +47,14 @@ jobs:
build:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
container: ghcr.io/xrplf/ci/tools-rippled-documentation:sha-a8c7be1
permissions:
pull-requests: write
contents: read
steps:
- name: Checkout repository
uses: actions/checkout@de0fac2e4500dabe0009e67214ff5f5447ce83dd # v6.0.2
with:
fetch-depth: 0
- name: Prepare runner
uses: XRPLF/actions/prepare-runner@90f11ee655d1687824fb8793db770477d52afbab
@@ -57,21 +67,25 @@ jobs:
with:
subtract: ${{ env.NPROC_SUBTRACT }}
- name: Install coverxygen
# TODO: drop pin once upstream fixes the 1.8.x regression.
# 1.8.2 crashes on enums when no --exclude is configured:
# AttributeError: 'str' object has no attribute 'iter'
# at coverxygen/__init__.py extract_enum_qualified_name
run: pip install 'coverxygen<1.8'
- name: Check configuration
run: |
echo 'Checking path.'
echo ${PATH} | tr ':' '\n'
echo 'Checking environment variables.'
env | sort
echo 'Checking CMake version.'
cmake --version
echo 'Checking Doxygen version.'
doxygen --version
- name: Build documentation
- name: Build documentation (PR/HEAD)
env:
BUILD_NPROC: ${{ steps.nproc.outputs.nproc }}
run: |
@@ -80,6 +94,91 @@ jobs:
cmake -Donly_docs=ON ..
cmake --build . --target docs --parallel ${BUILD_NPROC}
- name: Determine changed C++ files
if: github.event_name == 'pull_request'
id: changed
uses: tj-actions/changed-files@9426d40962ed5378910ee2e21d5f8c6fcbf2dd96 # v47.0.6
with:
files: |
include/**/*.h
src/**/*.h
src/**/*.cpp
- name: Cache base-branch Doxygen XML
if: github.event_name == 'pull_request'
id: base-cache
uses: actions/cache@0057852bfaa89a56745cba8c7296529d2fc39830 # v4.3.0
with:
path: build-base/docs/xml
key: doxygen-xml-${{ github.event.pull_request.base.sha }}-${{ hashFiles('docs/Doxyfile') }}
- name: Build base-branch Doxygen XML (cache miss)
if: github.event_name == 'pull_request' && steps.base-cache.outputs.cache-hit != 'true'
env:
BUILD_NPROC: ${{ steps.nproc.outputs.nproc }}
run: |
git checkout ${{ github.event.pull_request.base.sha }}
mkdir -p build-base
cd build-base
if ! cmake -Donly_docs=ON .. > cmake.log 2>&1; then
echo "::warning::Base-branch cmake configure failed; ratchet disabled for this PR"
cat cmake.log
elif ! cmake --build . --target docs --parallel ${BUILD_NPROC} > build.log 2>&1; then
echo "::warning::Base-branch Doxygen build failed; ratchet disabled for this PR"
tail -50 build.log
fi
cd ..
git checkout ${{ github.event.pull_request.head.sha }}
- name: Generate coverage report (PR)
if: github.event_name == 'pull_request'
run: |
python3 -m coverxygen \
--xml-dir ${BUILD_DIR}/docs/xml \
--src-dir . \
--output doc-coverage.info \
--kind class,struct,function,enum,typedef,variable \
--scope public
- name: Generate coverage report (base)
if: github.event_name == 'pull_request'
run: |
if [ -d "build-base/docs/xml" ]; then
python3 -m coverxygen \
--xml-dir build-base/docs/xml \
--src-dir . \
--output base-doc-coverage.info \
--kind class,struct,function,enum,typedef,variable \
--scope public || true
fi
- name: Check coverage thresholds
if: github.event_name == 'pull_request'
run: |
BASE_FLAG=""
if [ -f "base-doc-coverage.info" ]; then
BASE_FLAG="--base-lcov-file base-doc-coverage.info"
fi
NEW_FILES=""
if [ -n "${{ steps.changed.outputs.added_files }}" ]; then
NEW_FILES="--new-files ${{ steps.changed.outputs.added_files }}"
fi
python3 .github/scripts/doc-coverage-check.py \
--lcov-file doc-coverage.info \
--threshold-file .github/doc-coverage-thresholds.json \
--output doc-coverage-report.md \
${BASE_FLAG} \
${NEW_FILES} || true
- name: Post coverage report to PR
if: github.event_name == 'pull_request' && always()
uses: marocchino/sticky-pull-request-comment@67d0dec7b07ed060a405f9b2a64b8ab319fdd7db # v2.9.2
with:
header: doc-coverage
path: doc-coverage-report.md
- name: Create documentation artifact
if: ${{ github.event.repository.visibility == 'public' && github.event_name == 'push' }}
uses: actions/upload-pages-artifact@fc324d3547104276b827a68afc52ff2a11cc49c9 # v5.0.0

View File

@@ -1,89 +0,0 @@
# Build a single-platform Docker image. On push, the image is pushed to
# GHCR with arch-suffixed tags (e.g. `:latest-amd64`, `:sha-abc-amd64`)
# so the calling workflow can stitch per-arch builds into a multi-arch
# manifest without needing to pass digests around.
name: Reusable build Docker image (single platform)
on:
workflow_call:
inputs:
image_name:
description: "Full image name without tag (e.g. 'ghcr.io/xrplf/xrpld/nix-ubuntu')"
required: true
type: string
dockerfile:
description: "Path to the Dockerfile, relative to the repository root"
required: true
type: string
base_image:
description: "Value passed to the Dockerfile as the BASE_IMAGE build arg"
required: true
type: string
platform:
description: "Docker platform string, e.g. linux/amd64"
required: true
type: string
runner:
description: "GitHub Actions runner label to build on"
required: true
type: string
push:
description: "Whether to push the image to GHCR"
required: true
type: boolean
defaults:
run:
shell: bash
jobs:
build:
name: Build (${{ inputs.platform }})
runs-on: ${{ inputs.runner }}
permissions:
contents: read
packages: write
steps:
- name: Checkout repository
uses: actions/checkout@de0fac2e4500dabe0009e67214ff5f5447ce83dd # v6.0.2
- name: Determine arch
id: vars
env:
PLATFORM: ${{ inputs.platform }}
run: |
echo "arch=${PLATFORM##*/}" >>$GITHUB_OUTPUT
- name: Set up Docker Buildx
uses: docker/setup-buildx-action@d7f5e7f509e45cec5c76c4d5afdd7de93d0b3df5 # v4.1.0
- name: Login to GitHub Container Registry
if: inputs.push
uses: docker/login-action@650006c6eb7dba73a995cc03b0b2d7f5ca915bee # v4.2.0
with:
registry: ghcr.io
username: ${{ github.repository_owner }}
password: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
- name: Docker metadata
id: meta
uses: docker/metadata-action@80c7e94dd9b9319bd5eb7a0e0fe9291e23a2a2e9 # v6.1.0
with:
images: ${{ inputs.image_name }}
tags: |
type=sha,prefix=sha-,format=short
type=raw,value=latest
flavor: |
suffix=-${{ steps.vars.outputs.arch }},onlatest=true
- name: Build and push
uses: docker/build-push-action@f9f3042f7e2789586610d6e8b85c8f03e5195baf # v7.2.0
with:
context: .
file: ${{ inputs.dockerfile }}
platforms: ${{ inputs.platform }}
push: ${{ inputs.push }}
tags: ${{ steps.meta.outputs.tags }}
labels: ${{ steps.meta.outputs.labels }}
build-args: BASE_IMAGE=${{ inputs.base_image }}

View File

@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ jobs:
- name: Set ccache log file
if: ${{ inputs.ccache_enabled && runner.debug == '1' }}
run: echo "CCACHE_LOGFILE=${{ runner.temp }}/ccache.log" >>"${GITHUB_ENV}"
run: echo "CCACHE_LOGFILE=${{ runner.temp }}/ccache.log" >> "${GITHUB_ENV}"
- name: Print build environment
uses: XRPLF/actions/print-build-env@59dec886e4afb05a1724443af08baccbc045b574
@@ -146,11 +146,11 @@ jobs:
CMAKE_ARGS: ${{ inputs.cmake_args }}
run: |
cmake \
-G '${{ runner.os == 'Windows' && 'Visual Studio 17 2022' || 'Ninja' }}' \
-DCMAKE_TOOLCHAIN_FILE:FILEPATH=build/generators/conan_toolchain.cmake \
-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE="${BUILD_TYPE}" \
${CMAKE_ARGS} \
..
-G '${{ runner.os == 'Windows' && 'Visual Studio 17 2022' || 'Ninja' }}' \
-DCMAKE_TOOLCHAIN_FILE:FILEPATH=build/generators/conan_toolchain.cmake \
-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE="${BUILD_TYPE}" \
${CMAKE_ARGS} \
..
- name: Check protocol autogen files are up-to-date
working-directory: ${{ env.BUILD_DIR }}
@@ -172,32 +172,32 @@ jobs:
cmake --build . --target code_gen
DIFF=$(git -C .. status --porcelain -- include/xrpl/protocol_autogen src/tests/libxrpl/protocol_autogen)
if [ -n "${DIFF}" ]; then
echo "::error::Generated protocol files are out of date"
git -C .. diff -- include/xrpl/protocol_autogen src/tests/libxrpl/protocol_autogen
echo "${MESSAGE}"
exit 1
echo "::error::Generated protocol files are out of date"
git -C .. diff -- include/xrpl/protocol_autogen src/tests/libxrpl/protocol_autogen
echo "${MESSAGE}"
exit 1
fi
- name: Build the binary
working-directory: ${{ env.BUILD_DIR }}
env:
BUILD_NPROC: ${{ steps.nproc.outputs.nproc }}
BUILD_NPROC: ${{ runner.os == 'Linux' && '16' || steps.nproc.outputs.nproc }}
BUILD_TYPE: ${{ inputs.build_type }}
CMAKE_TARGET: ${{ inputs.cmake_target }}
run: |
cmake \
--build . \
--config "${BUILD_TYPE}" \
--parallel "${BUILD_NPROC}" \
--target "${CMAKE_TARGET}"
--build . \
--config "${BUILD_TYPE}" \
--parallel "${BUILD_NPROC}" \
--target "${CMAKE_TARGET}"
- name: Show ccache statistics
if: ${{ inputs.ccache_enabled }}
run: |
ccache --show-stats -vv
if [ '${{ runner.debug }}' = '1' ]; then
cat "${CCACHE_LOGFILE}"
curl ${CCACHE_REMOTE_STORAGE%|*}/status || true
cat "${CCACHE_LOGFILE}"
curl ${CCACHE_REMOTE_STORAGE%|*}/status || true
fi
- name: Upload the binary (Linux)
@@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ jobs:
working-directory: ${{ env.BUILD_DIR }}
run: |
set -o pipefail
./xrpld --definitions | python3 -m json.tool >server_definitions.json
./xrpld --definitions | python3 -m json.tool > server_definitions.json
- name: Upload server definitions
if: ${{ github.event.repository.visibility == 'public' && inputs.config_name == 'debian-bookworm-gcc-13-amd64-release' }}
@@ -231,10 +231,10 @@ jobs:
run: |
ldd ./xrpld
if [ "$(ldd ./xrpld | grep -E '(libstdc\+\+|libgcc)' | wc -l)" -eq 0 ]; then
echo 'The binary is statically linked.'
echo 'The binary is statically linked.'
else
echo 'The binary is dynamically linked.'
exit 1
echo 'The binary is dynamically linked.'
exit 1
fi
- name: Verify presence of instrumentation (Linux)
@@ -250,12 +250,12 @@ jobs:
run: |
ASAN_OPTS="include=${GITHUB_WORKSPACE}/sanitizers/suppressions/runtime-asan-options.txt:suppressions=${GITHUB_WORKSPACE}/sanitizers/suppressions/asan.supp"
if [[ "${CONFIG_NAME}" == *gcc* ]]; then
ASAN_OPTS="${ASAN_OPTS}:alloc_dealloc_mismatch=0"
ASAN_OPTS="${ASAN_OPTS}:alloc_dealloc_mismatch=0"
fi
echo "ASAN_OPTIONS=${ASAN_OPTS}" >>${GITHUB_ENV}
echo "TSAN_OPTIONS=include=${GITHUB_WORKSPACE}/sanitizers/suppressions/runtime-tsan-options.txt:suppressions=${GITHUB_WORKSPACE}/sanitizers/suppressions/tsan.supp" >>${GITHUB_ENV}
echo "UBSAN_OPTIONS=include=${GITHUB_WORKSPACE}/sanitizers/suppressions/runtime-ubsan-options.txt:suppressions=${GITHUB_WORKSPACE}/sanitizers/suppressions/ubsan.supp" >>${GITHUB_ENV}
echo "LSAN_OPTIONS=include=${GITHUB_WORKSPACE}/sanitizers/suppressions/runtime-lsan-options.txt:suppressions=${GITHUB_WORKSPACE}/sanitizers/suppressions/lsan.supp" >>${GITHUB_ENV}
echo "ASAN_OPTIONS=${ASAN_OPTS}" >> ${GITHUB_ENV}
echo "TSAN_OPTIONS=include=${GITHUB_WORKSPACE}/sanitizers/suppressions/runtime-tsan-options.txt:suppressions=${GITHUB_WORKSPACE}/sanitizers/suppressions/tsan.supp" >> ${GITHUB_ENV}
echo "UBSAN_OPTIONS=include=${GITHUB_WORKSPACE}/sanitizers/suppressions/runtime-ubsan-options.txt:suppressions=${GITHUB_WORKSPACE}/sanitizers/suppressions/ubsan.supp" >> ${GITHUB_ENV}
echo "LSAN_OPTIONS=include=${GITHUB_WORKSPACE}/sanitizers/suppressions/runtime-lsan-options.txt:suppressions=${GITHUB_WORKSPACE}/sanitizers/suppressions/lsan.supp" >> ${GITHUB_ENV}
- name: Run the separate tests
if: ${{ !inputs.build_only }}
@@ -266,9 +266,9 @@ jobs:
PARALLELISM: ${{ runner.os == 'Windows' && '1' || steps.nproc.outputs.nproc }}
run: |
ctest \
--output-on-failure \
-C "${BUILD_TYPE}" \
-j "${PARALLELISM}"
--output-on-failure \
-C "${BUILD_TYPE}" \
-j "${PARALLELISM}"
- name: Run the embedded tests
if: ${{ !inputs.build_only }}
@@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ jobs:
run: |
set -o pipefail
# Coverage builds are slower due to instrumentation; use fewer parallel jobs to avoid flakiness
[ "$COVERAGE_ENABLED" = "true" ] && BUILD_NPROC=$((BUILD_NPROC - 2))
[ "$COVERAGE_ENABLED" = "true" ] && BUILD_NPROC=$(( BUILD_NPROC - 2 ))
./xrpld --unittest --unittest-jobs "${BUILD_NPROC}" 2>&1 | tee unittest.log
- name: Show test failure summary
@@ -287,19 +287,19 @@ jobs:
WORKING_DIR: ${{ runner.os == 'Windows' && format('{0}\{1}', env.BUILD_DIR, inputs.build_type) || env.BUILD_DIR }}
run: |
if [ ! -d "${WORKING_DIR}" ]; then
echo "Working directory '${WORKING_DIR}' does not exist."
exit 0
echo "Working directory '${WORKING_DIR}' does not exist."
exit 0
fi
cd "${WORKING_DIR}"
if [ ! -f unittest.log ]; then
echo "unittest.log not found; embedded tests may not have run."
exit 0
echo "unittest.log not found; embedded tests may not have run."
exit 0
fi
if ! grep -E "failed" unittest.log; then
echo "Log present but no failure lines found in unittest.log."
echo "Log present but no failure lines found in unittest.log."
fi
- name: Debug failure (Linux)
if: ${{ failure() && runner.os == 'Linux' && !inputs.build_only }}
@@ -317,14 +317,14 @@ jobs:
BUILD_TYPE: ${{ inputs.build_type }}
run: |
cmake \
--build . \
--config "${BUILD_TYPE}" \
--parallel "${BUILD_NPROC}" \
--target coverage
--build . \
--config "${BUILD_TYPE}" \
--parallel "${BUILD_NPROC}" \
--target coverage
- name: Upload coverage report
if: ${{ github.repository == 'XRPLF/rippled' && !inputs.build_only && env.COVERAGE_ENABLED == 'true' }}
uses: codecov/codecov-action@e79a6962e0d4c0c17b229090214935d2e33f8354 # v6.0.1
uses: codecov/codecov-action@57e3a136b779b570ffcdbf80b3bdc90e7fab3de2 # v6.0.0
with:
disable_search: true
disable_telem: true

View File

@@ -38,9 +38,9 @@ jobs:
run: |
DIFF=$(git status --porcelain)
if [ -n "${DIFF}" ]; then
# Print the differences to give the contributor a hint about what to
# expect when running levelization on their own machine.
git diff
echo "${MESSAGE}"
exit 1
# Print the differences to give the contributor a hint about what to
# expect when running levelization on their own machine.
git diff
echo "${MESSAGE}"
exit 1
fi

View File

@@ -48,9 +48,9 @@ jobs:
run: |
DIFF=$(git status --porcelain)
if [ -n "${DIFF}" ]; then
# Print the differences to give the contributor a hint about what to
# expect when running the renaming scripts on their own machine.
git diff
echo "${MESSAGE}"
exit 1
# Print the differences to give the contributor a hint about what to
# expect when running the renaming scripts on their own machine.
git diff
echo "${MESSAGE}"
exit 1
fi

View File

@@ -70,13 +70,13 @@ jobs:
working-directory: ${{ env.BUILD_DIR }}
run: |
cmake \
-G 'Ninja' \
-DCMAKE_TOOLCHAIN_FILE:FILEPATH=build/generators/conan_toolchain.cmake \
-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE="${BUILD_TYPE}" \
-Dtests=ON \
-Dwerr=ON \
-Dxrpld=ON \
..
-G 'Ninja' \
-DCMAKE_TOOLCHAIN_FILE:FILEPATH=build/generators/conan_toolchain.cmake \
-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE="${BUILD_TYPE}" \
-Dtests=ON \
-Dwerr=ON \
-Dxrpld=ON \
..
# clang-tidy needs headers generated from proto files
- name: Build libxrpl.libpb
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ jobs:
- name: Write issue header
if: ${{ steps.run_clang_tidy.outcome != 'success' }}
run: |
cat >"${ISSUE_FILE}" <<EOF
cat > "${ISSUE_FILE}" <<EOF
## Clang-tidy Check Failed
### Clang-tidy Output:
@@ -144,30 +144,30 @@ jobs:
if: ${{ steps.run_clang_tidy.outcome != 'success' }}
run: |
if [ -f "${OUTPUT_FILE}" ]; then
# Extract lines containing 'error:', 'warning:', or 'note:'
grep -E '(error:|warning:|note:)' "${OUTPUT_FILE}" >filtered-output.txt || true
# Extract lines containing 'error:', 'warning:', or 'note:'
grep -E '(error:|warning:|note:)' "${OUTPUT_FILE}" > filtered-output.txt || true
# If filtered output is empty, use original (might be a different error format)
if [ ! -s filtered-output.txt ]; then
cp "${OUTPUT_FILE}" filtered-output.txt
fi
# If filtered output is empty, use original (might be a different error format)
if [ ! -s filtered-output.txt ]; then
cp "${OUTPUT_FILE}" filtered-output.txt
fi
# Truncate if too large
head -c 60000 filtered-output.txt >>"${ISSUE_FILE}"
if [ "$(wc -c <filtered-output.txt)" -gt 60000 ]; then
echo "" >>"${ISSUE_FILE}"
echo "... (output truncated, see artifacts for full output)" >>"${ISSUE_FILE}"
fi
# Truncate if too large
head -c 60000 filtered-output.txt >> "${ISSUE_FILE}"
if [ "$(wc -c < filtered-output.txt)" -gt 60000 ]; then
echo "" >> "${ISSUE_FILE}"
echo "... (output truncated, see artifacts for full output)" >> "${ISSUE_FILE}"
fi
rm filtered-output.txt
rm filtered-output.txt
else
echo "No output file found" >>"${ISSUE_FILE}"
echo "No output file found" >> "${ISSUE_FILE}"
fi
- name: Append issue footer
if: ${{ steps.run_clang_tidy.outcome != 'success' }}
run: |
cat >>"${ISSUE_FILE}" <<EOF
cat >> "${ISSUE_FILE}" <<EOF
\`\`\`
---
@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ jobs:
- name: Create issue
if: ${{ steps.run_clang_tidy.outcome != 'success' && inputs.create_issue_on_failure }}
uses: XRPLF/actions/create-issue@2b8bc36af85b88bca0dd7bfac2e2dc05f94ad712
uses: XRPLF/actions/create-issue@fbcc16eb7f20dc3199eaf1aed0d3523a5ba9008c
with:
title: "Clang-tidy check failed"
body_file: ${{ env.ISSUE_FILE }}

View File

@@ -1,99 +0,0 @@
# Build Linux packages (DEB and RPM) from pre-built binary artifacts.
# Discovers which configurations to package from linux.json (os entries
# with "package": true) and fans out one job per entry. Today only
# linux/amd64 is emitted; the architecture is hardcoded both here
# (runner) and in generate.py.
name: Package
on:
workflow_call:
inputs:
pkg_release:
description: "Package release number. Increment when repackaging the same executable."
required: false
type: string
default: "1"
defaults:
run:
shell: bash
env:
BUILD_DIR: build
jobs:
generate-matrix:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
outputs:
matrix: ${{ steps.generate.outputs.matrix }}
steps:
- name: Checkout repository
uses: actions/checkout@de0fac2e4500dabe0009e67214ff5f5447ce83dd # v6.0.2
- name: Set up Python
uses: actions/setup-python@a309ff8b426b58ec0e2a45f0f869d46889d02405 # v6.2.0
with:
python-version: 3.13
- name: Generate packaging matrix
id: generate
working-directory: .github/scripts/strategy-matrix
run: |
./generate.py --packaging --config=linux.json >>"${GITHUB_OUTPUT}"
generate-version:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
outputs:
version: ${{ steps.version.outputs.version }}
steps:
- name: Checkout repository
uses: actions/checkout@de0fac2e4500dabe0009e67214ff5f5447ce83dd # v6.0.2
with:
sparse-checkout: |
.github/actions/generate-version
src/libxrpl/protocol/BuildInfo.cpp
- name: Generate version
id: version
uses: ./.github/actions/generate-version
package:
needs: [generate-matrix, generate-version]
if: ${{ github.event.repository.visibility == 'public' }}
strategy:
fail-fast: false
matrix: ${{ fromJson(needs.generate-matrix.outputs.matrix) }}
name: "${{ matrix.artifact_name }}"
permissions:
contents: read
runs-on: ["self-hosted", "Linux", "X64", "heavy"]
container: ${{ format('ghcr.io/xrplf/ci/{0}-{1}:{2}-{3}-sha-{4}', matrix.os.distro_name, matrix.os.distro_version, matrix.os.compiler_name, matrix.os.compiler_version, matrix.os.image_sha) }}
timeout-minutes: 30
steps:
- name: Checkout repository
uses: actions/checkout@de0fac2e4500dabe0009e67214ff5f5447ce83dd # v6.0.2
- name: Download pre-built binary
uses: actions/download-artifact@3e5f45b2cfb9172054b4087a40e8e0b5a5461e7c # v8.0.1
with:
name: ${{ matrix.artifact_name }}
path: ${{ env.BUILD_DIR }}
- name: Make binary executable
run: chmod +x "${BUILD_DIR}/xrpld"
- name: Build package
env:
PKG_VERSION: ${{ needs.generate-version.outputs.version }}
PKG_RELEASE: ${{ inputs.pkg_release }}
run: ./package/build_pkg.sh
- name: Upload package artifact
uses: actions/upload-artifact@043fb46d1a93c77aae656e7c1c64a875d1fc6a0a # v7.0.1
with:
name: ${{ matrix.artifact_name }}-pkg-${{ needs.generate-version.outputs.version }}
path: |
${{ env.BUILD_DIR }}/debbuild/*.deb
${{ env.BUILD_DIR }}/debbuild/*.ddeb
${{ env.BUILD_DIR }}/rpmbuild/RPMS/**/*.rpm
if-no-files-found: error

View File

@@ -42,4 +42,4 @@ jobs:
env:
GENERATE_CONFIG: ${{ inputs.os != '' && format('--config={0}.json', inputs.os) || '' }}
GENERATE_OPTION: ${{ inputs.strategy_matrix == 'all' && '--all' || '' }}
run: ./generate.py ${GENERATE_OPTION} ${GENERATE_CONFIG} >>"${GITHUB_OUTPUT}"
run: ./generate.py ${GENERATE_OPTION} ${GENERATE_CONFIG} >> "${GITHUB_OUTPUT}"

10
.gitignore vendored
View File

@@ -1,6 +1,10 @@
# .gitignore
# cspell: disable
# AI-generated documentation source (temporary, used by doc-agent
# during the initial documentation pass; removed once docs are merged).
*.ai.md
# Macintosh Desktop Services Store files.
.DS_Store
@@ -15,6 +19,12 @@ Release/
/.build/
/.venv/
/build/
/build-base/
/doc-coverage.info
/base-doc-coverage.info
/doc-coverage-report.md
/doc-review-report.md
/doc-review-comments.json
/db/
/out.txt
/Testing/

View File

@@ -37,50 +37,37 @@ repos:
exclude: ^include/xrpl/protocol_autogen/(transactions|ledger_entries)/
- repo: https://github.com/pre-commit/mirrors-clang-format
rev: dd18dad857d6133e90bbe478f4f2f22ec0030269 # frozen: v22.1.5
rev: cd481d7b0bfb5c7b3090c21846317f9a8262e891 # frozen: v22.1.0
hooks:
- id: clang-format
args: [--style=file]
"types_or": [c++, c, proto]
exclude: ^include/xrpl/protocol_autogen/(transactions|ledger_entries)/
- repo: https://github.com/BlankSpruce/gersemi-pre-commit
rev: faadd6a9d852369ca94f4d15b2404c967ba8cb01 # frozen: 0.27.6
- repo: https://github.com/BlankSpruce/gersemi
rev: 0.26.0
hooks:
- id: gersemi
- repo: https://github.com/rbubley/mirrors-prettier
rev: 515f543f5718ebfd6ce22e16708bb32c68ff96e1 # frozen: v3.8.3
rev: c2bc67fe8f8f549cc489e00ba8b45aa18ee713b1 # frozen: v3.8.1
hooks:
- id: prettier
args: [--end-of-line=auto]
- repo: https://github.com/psf/black-pre-commit-mirror
rev: 4160603246a6b365d4a2af661c6d71b0a0f50478 # frozen: 26.5.1
rev: ea488cebbfd88a5f50b8bd95d5c829d0bb76feb8 # frozen: 26.1.0
hooks:
- id: black
- repo: https://github.com/scop/pre-commit-shfmt
rev: 05c1426671b9237fb5e1444dd63aa5731bec0dfb # frozen: v3.13.1-1
- repo: https://github.com/openstack/bashate
rev: 5798d24d571676fc407e81df574c1ef57b520f23 # frozen: 2.1.1
hooks:
- id: shfmt
args: [--write, --indent=4, --case-indent=true]
- repo: local
hooks:
- id: format-inline-bash-workflows
name: "format `run:` blocks in workflows/actions"
entry: ./.github/scripts/format-inline-bash.py
language: python
files: ^\.github/(workflows|actions)/.*\.ya?ml$
- id: format-inline-bash-markdown
name: "format ```bash blocks in markdown"
entry: ./.github/scripts/format-inline-bash.py
language: python
files: \.md$
- id: bashate
args: ["--ignore=E006"]
- repo: https://github.com/streetsidesoftware/cspell-cli
rev: 4643f154907327ee0a2c7038f0296e0dd77d9776 # frozen: v10.0.0
rev: a42085ade523f591dca134379a595e7859986445 # frozen: v9.7.0
hooks:
- id: cspell # Spell check changed files
exclude: |

View File

@@ -151,8 +151,8 @@ git init
git remote add origin git@github.com:XRPLF/conan-center-index.git
git sparse-checkout init
for recipe in "${recipes[@]}"; do
echo "Checking out recipe '${recipe}'..."
git sparse-checkout add recipes/${recipe}
echo "Checking out recipe '${recipe}'..."
git sparse-checkout add recipes/${recipe}
done
git fetch origin master
git checkout master
@@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ the new recipe will be automatically pulled from the official Conan Center.
If you see an error similar to the following after running `conan profile show`:
```text
```bash
ERROR: Invalid setting '17' is not a valid 'settings.compiler.version' value.
Possible values are ['5.0', '5.1', '6.0', '6.1', '7.0', '7.3', '8.0', '8.1',
'9.0', '9.1', '10.0', '11.0', '12.0', '13', '13.0', '13.1', '14', '14.0', '15',
@@ -427,19 +427,16 @@ install ccache --version 4.11.3 --allow-downgrade`.
Single-config generators:
```
cmake --build . --parallel N
cmake --build .
```
Multi-config generators:
```
cmake --build . --config Release --parallel N
cmake --build . --config Debug --parallel N
cmake --build . --config Release
cmake --build . --config Debug
```
Replace the `--parallel` parameter N with the desired number of parallel jobs. A common starting point is half of the number of available CPU
cores.
5. Test xrpld.
Single-config generators:

View File

@@ -117,18 +117,6 @@ if(rocksdb)
target_link_libraries(xrpl_libs INTERFACE RocksDB::rocksdb)
endif()
# OpenTelemetry distributed tracing (optional).
# When ON, links against opentelemetry-cpp and defines XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY
# so that SpanGuard factory methods produce real OTel spans.
# When OFF (default), all tracing code compiles to no-ops with zero overhead.
# Enable via: conan install -o telemetry=True, or cmake -Dtelemetry=ON.
option(telemetry "Enable OpenTelemetry tracing" ON)
if(telemetry)
find_package(opentelemetry-cpp CONFIG REQUIRED)
add_compile_definitions(XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY)
message(STATUS "OpenTelemetry tracing enabled")
endif()
# Work around changes to Conan recipe for now.
if(TARGET nudb::core)
set(nudb nudb::core)
@@ -146,7 +134,6 @@ endif()
include(XrplCore)
include(XrplProtocolAutogen)
include(XrplInstall)
include(XrplPackaging)
include(XrplValidatorKeys)
if(tests)

View File

@@ -1,567 +0,0 @@
# Distributed Tracing Fundamentals
> **Parent Document**: [OpenTelemetryPlan.md](./OpenTelemetryPlan.md)
> **Next**: [Architecture Analysis](./01-architecture-analysis.md)
---
## What is Distributed Tracing?
Distributed tracing is a method for tracking data objects as they flow through distributed systems. In a network like XRP Ledger, a single transaction touches multiple independent nodes—each with no shared memory or logging. Distributed tracing connects these dots.
**Without tracing:** You see isolated logs on each node with no way to correlate them.
**With tracing:** You see the complete journey of a transaction or an event across all nodes it touched.
---
## Actors and Actions at a Glance
### Actors
| Who (Plain English) | Technical Term |
| ---------------------------------------------- | --------------- |
| A single unit of work being tracked | Span |
| The complete journey of a request | Trace |
| Data that links spans across services | Trace Context |
| Code that creates spans and propagates context | Instrumentation |
| Service that receives and processes traces | Collector |
| Storage and visualization system | Backend (Tempo) |
| Decision logic for which traces to keep | Sampler |
### Actions
| What Happens (Plain English) | Technical Term |
| --------------------------------------- | ----------------------- |
| Start tracking a new operation | Create a Span |
| Connect a child operation to its parent | Set `parent_span_id` |
| Group all related operations together | Share a `trace_id` |
| Pass tracking data between services | Context Propagation |
| Decide whether to record a trace | Sampling (Head or Tail) |
| Send completed traces to storage | Export (OTLP) |
---
## Core Concepts
### 1. Trace
A **trace** represents the entire journey of a request through the system. It has a unique `trace_id` that stays constant across all nodes.
```
Trace ID: abc123
├── Node A: received transaction
├── Node B: relayed transaction
├── Node C: included in consensus
└── Node D: applied to ledger
```
### 2. Span
A **span** represents a single unit of work within a trace. Each span has:
| Attribute | Description | Example |
| ---------------- | -------------------------------- | -------------------------- |
| `trace_id` | Identifies the trace | `event123` |
| `span_id` | Unique identifier | `span456` |
| `parent_span_id` | Parent span (if any) | `p_span123` |
| `name` | Operation name | `rpc.submit` |
| `start_time` | When work began (local time) | `2024-01-15T10:30:00Z` |
| `end_time` | When work completed (local time) | `2024-01-15T10:30:00.050Z` |
| `attributes` | Key-value metadata | `tx.hash=ABC...` |
| `status` | OK, ERROR MSG | `OK` |
### 3. Trace Context
**Trace context** is the data that propagates between services to link spans together. It contains:
- `trace_id` - The trace this span belongs to
- `span_id` - The current span (becomes parent for child spans)
- `trace_flags` - Sampling decisions
---
## How Spans Form a Trace
Spans have parent-child relationships forming a tree structure:
```mermaid
flowchart TB
subgraph trace["Trace: abc123"]
A["tx.submit<br/>span_id: 001<br/>50ms"] --> B["tx.validate<br/>span_id: 002<br/>5ms"]
A --> C["tx.relay<br/>span_id: 003<br/>10ms"]
A --> D["tx.apply<br/>span_id: 004<br/>30ms"]
D --> E["ledger.update<br/>span_id: 005<br/>20ms"]
end
style A fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#ffffff
style B fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#ffffff
style C fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#ffffff
style D fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#ffffff
style E fill:#bf360c,stroke:#8c2809,color:#ffffff
```
**Reading the diagram:**
- **tx.submit (blue, root)**: The top-level span representing the entire transaction submission; all other spans are its descendants.
- **tx.validate, tx.relay, tx.apply (green)**: Direct children of tx.submit, representing the three main stages -- validation, relay to peers, and application to the ledger.
- **ledger.update (red)**: A grandchild span nested under tx.apply, representing the actual ledger state mutation triggered by applying the transaction.
- **Arrows (parent to child)**: Each arrow indicates a parent-child span relationship where the parent's completion depends on the child finishing.
The same trace visualized as a **timeline (Gantt chart)**:
```
Time → 0ms 10ms 20ms 30ms 40ms 50ms
├───────────────────────────────────────────┤
tx.submit│▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓│
├─────┤
tx.valid │▓▓▓▓▓│
│ ├──────────┤
tx.relay │ │▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓│
│ ├────────────────────────────┤
tx.apply │ │▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓│
│ ├──────────────────┤
ledger │ │▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓│
```
---
## Span Relationships
Spans don't always form simple parent-child trees. Distributed tracing defines several relationship types to capture different causal patterns:
### 1. Parent-Child (ChildOf)
The default relationship. The parent span **depends on** or **contains** the child span. The child runs within the scope of the parent.
```
tx.submit (parent)
├── tx.validate (child) ← parent waits for this
├── tx.relay (child) ← parent waits for this
└── tx.apply (child) ← parent waits for this
```
**When to use:** Synchronous calls, nested operations, any case where the parent's completion depends on the child.
### 2. Follows-From
A causal relationship where the first span **triggers** the second, but does **not wait** for it. The originator fires and moves on.
```
Time →
tx.receive [=======]
↓ triggers (follows-from)
tx.relay [===========] ← runs independently
```
**When to use:** Asynchronous jobs, queued work, fire-and-forget patterns. For example, a node receives a transaction and queues it for relay — the relay span _follows from_ the receive span but the receiver doesn't wait for relaying to complete.
> **OpenTracing** defined `FollowsFrom` as a first-class reference type alongside `ChildOf`.
> **OpenTelemetry** represents this using **Span Links** with descriptive attributes instead (see below).
### 3. Span Links (Cross-Trace and Non-Hierarchical)
Links connect spans that are **causally related but not in a parent-child hierarchy**. Unlike parent-child, links can cross trace boundaries.
```
Trace A Trace B
────── ──────
batch.schedule batch.execute
├─ item.enqueue (span X) ┌──► process.item
├─ item.enqueue (span Y) ───┤ (links to X, Y, Z)
├─ item.enqueue (span Z) └──►
```
**Use cases:**
| Pattern | Description |
| -------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| **Batch processing** | A batch span links back to all individual spans that contributed to it |
| **Fan-in** | An aggregation span links to the multiple producer spans it merges |
| **Fan-out** | Multiple downstream spans link back to the single span that triggered them |
| **Async handoff** | A deferred job links back to the request that queued it (follows-from) |
| **Cross-trace** | Correlating spans across independent traces (e.g., retries, related events) |
**Link structure:** Each link carries the target span's context plus optional attributes:
```
Link {
trace_id: <target trace>
span_id: <target span>
attributes: { "link.description": "triggered by batch scheduler" }
}
```
### Relationship Summary
```mermaid
flowchart LR
subgraph parent_child["Parent-Child"]
direction TB
P["Parent"] --> C["Child"]
end
subgraph follows_from["Follows-From"]
direction TB
A["Span A"] -.->|triggers| B["Span B"]
end
subgraph links["Span Links"]
direction TB
X["Span X\n(Trace 1)"] -.-|link| Y["Span Y\n(Trace 2)"]
end
parent_child ~~~ follows_from ~~~ links
style P fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#ffffff
style C fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#ffffff
style A fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#ffffff
style B fill:#bf360c,stroke:#8c2809,color:#ffffff
style X fill:#4a148c,stroke:#38006b,color:#ffffff
style Y fill:#4a148c,stroke:#38006b,color:#ffffff
```
| Relationship | Same Trace? | Dependency? | OTel Mechanism |
| ---------------- | ----------- | -------------------------- | ----------------- |
| **Parent-Child** | Yes | Parent depends on child | `parent_span_id` |
| **Follows-From** | Usually | Causal but no dependency | Link + attributes |
| **Span Link** | Either | Correlation, no dependency | Link + attributes |
---
## Trace ID Generation
A `trace_id` is a 128-bit (16-byte) identifier that groups all spans belonging to one logical operation. How it's generated determines how easily you can find and correlate traces later.
### General Approaches
#### 1. Random (W3C Default)
Generate a random 128-bit ID when a trace starts. Standard approach for most services.
```
trace_id = random_128_bits()
```
| Pros | Cons |
| --------------------------- | --------------------------------------------- |
| Simple, standard | No natural correlation to domain events |
| Guaranteed unique per trace | If propagation is lost, trace is broken |
| Works with all OTel tooling | "Find trace for TX abc" requires index lookup |
#### 2. Deterministic (Derived from Domain Data)
Compute the trace_id from a hash of a natural identifier. Every node independently derives the **same** trace_id for the same event.
```
trace_id = SHA-256(domain_identifier)[0:16] // truncate to 128 bits
```
| Pros | Cons |
| --------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------- |
| Propagation-resilient — same ID computed everywhere | Same event processed twice (retry) shares trace_id |
| Natural search — domain ID maps directly to trace | Non-standard (tooling assumes random) |
| No coordination needed between nodes | 256→128 bit truncation (collision risk negligible at ~2⁶⁴) |
#### 3. Hybrid (Deterministic Prefix + Random Suffix)
First 8 bytes derived from domain data, last 8 bytes random.
```
trace_id = SHA-256(domain_identifier)[0:8] || random_64_bits()
```
| Pros | Cons |
| ------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------- |
| Prefix search: "find all traces for TX abc" | Must propagate to maintain full trace_id |
| Unique per processing instance | More complex generation logic |
| Retries get distinct trace_ids | Partial correlation only (prefix match) |
### XRPL Workflow Analysis
XRPL has a unique advantage: its core workflows produce **globally unique 256-bit hashes** that are known on every node. This makes deterministic trace_id generation practical in ways most systems can't achieve.
#### Natural Identifiers by Workflow
| Workflow | Natural Identifier | Size | Known at Start? | Same on All Nodes? |
| ------------------- | --------------------------------- | ---------- | ----------------------------- | -------------------------------- |
| **Transaction** | Transaction hash (`tid_`) | 256-bit | Yes — computed before signing | Yes — hash of canonical tx data |
| **Consensus round** | Previous ledger hash + ledger seq | 256+32 bit | Yes — known when round opens | Yes — all validators agree |
| **Validation** | Ledger hash being validated | 256-bit | Yes — from consensus result | Yes — same closed ledger |
| **Ledger catch-up** | Target ledger hash | 256-bit | Yes — we know what to fetch | Yes — identifies ledger globally |
#### Where These Identifiers Live in Code
```
Transaction: STTx::getTransactionID() → uint256 tid_
TMTransaction::rawTransaction → recompute hash from bytes
Consensus: ConsensusProposal::prevLedger_ → uint256 (previous ledger hash)
ConsensusProposal::position_ → uint256 (TxSet hash)
LedgerHeader::seq → uint32_t (ledger sequence)
Validation: STValidation::getLedgerHash() → uint256
STValidation::getNodeID() → NodeID (160-bit)
Ledger fetch: InboundLedger constructor → uint256 hash, uint32_t seq
TMGetLedger::ledgerHash → bytes (uint256)
```
### Recommended Strategy: Workflow-Scoped Deterministic
Each workflow type derives its trace_id from its natural domain identifier:
```
Transaction trace: trace_id = SHA-256("tx" || tx_hash)[0:16]
Consensus trace: trace_id = SHA-256("cons" || prev_ledger_hash || ledger_seq)[0:16]
Ledger catch-up: trace_id = SHA-256("fetch" || target_ledger_hash)[0:16]
```
The string prefix (`"tx"`, `"cons"`, `"fetch"`) prevents collisions between workflows that might share underlying hashes.
**Why this works for XRPL:**
1. **Propagation-resilient** — Even if a P2P message drops trace context, every node independently computes the same trace_id from the same tx_hash or ledger_hash. Spans still correlate.
2. **Zero-cost search** — "Show me the trace for transaction ABC" becomes a direct lookup: compute `SHA-256("tx" || ABC)[0:16]` and query. No secondary index needed.
3. **Cross-workflow linking via Span Links** — A consensus trace links to individual transaction traces. A validation span links to the consensus trace. This connects the full picture without forcing everything into one giant trace.
### Cross-Workflow Correlation
Each workflow gets its own trace. Span Links tie them together:
```mermaid
flowchart TB
subgraph tx_trace["Transaction Trace"]
direction LR
Tn["trace_id = f(tx_hash)"]:::note --> T1["tx.receive"] --> T2["tx.validate"] --> T3["tx.relay"]
end
subgraph cons_trace["Consensus Trace"]
direction LR
Cn["trace_id = f(prev_ledger, seq)"]:::note --> C1["cons.open"] --> C2["cons.propose"] --> C3["cons.accept"]
end
subgraph val_trace["Validation"]
direction LR
Vn["spans within consensus trace"]:::note --> V1["val.create"] --> V2["val.broadcast"]
end
subgraph fetch_trace["Catch-Up Trace"]
direction LR
Fn["trace_id = f(ledger_hash)"]:::note --> F1["fetch.request"] --> F2["fetch.receive"] --> F3["fetch.apply"]
end
C1 -.-|"span link\n(tx traces)"| T3
C3 --> V1
F1 -.-|"span link\n(target ledger)"| C3
classDef note fill:none,stroke:#888,stroke-dasharray:5 5,color:#333,font-style:italic
style T1 fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#ffffff
style T2 fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#ffffff
style T3 fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#ffffff
style C1 fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#ffffff
style C2 fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#ffffff
style C3 fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#ffffff
style V1 fill:#bf360c,stroke:#8c2809,color:#ffffff
style V2 fill:#bf360c,stroke:#8c2809,color:#ffffff
style F1 fill:#4a148c,stroke:#38006b,color:#ffffff
style F2 fill:#4a148c,stroke:#38006b,color:#ffffff
style F3 fill:#4a148c,stroke:#38006b,color:#ffffff
```
**Reading the diagram:**
- **Transaction Trace (blue)**: An independent trace whose `trace_id` is deterministically derived from the transaction hash. Contains receive, validate, and relay spans.
- **Consensus Trace (green)**: An independent trace whose `trace_id` is derived from the previous ledger hash and sequence number. Covers the open, propose, and accept phases.
- **Validation (red)**: Validation spans live within the consensus trace (not a separate trace). They are created after the accept phase completes.
- **Catch-Up Trace (purple)**: An independent trace for ledger acquisition, derived from the target ledger hash. Used when a node is behind and fetching missing ledgers.
- **Dotted arrows (span links)**: Cross-trace correlations. Consensus links to transaction traces it included; catch-up links to the consensus trace that produced the target ledger.
- **Solid arrow (C3 to V1)**: A parent-child relationship -- validation spans are direct children of the consensus accept span within the same trace.
**How a query flows:**
```
"Why was TX abc slow?"
1. Compute trace_id = SHA-256("tx" || abc)[0:16]
2. Find transaction trace → see it was included in consensus round N
3. Follow span link → consensus trace for round N
4. See which phase was slow (propose? accept?)
5. If a node was catching up, follow link → catch-up trace
```
### Trade-offs to Consider
| Concern | Mitigation |
| ----------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| **Retries get same trace_id** | Add `attempt` attribute to root span; spans have unique span_ids and timestamps |
| **256→128 bit truncation** | Birthday-bound collision at ~2⁶⁴ operations — negligible for XRPL's throughput |
| **Non-standard generation** | OTel spec allows any 16-byte non-zero value; tooling works on the hex string |
| **Hash computation cost** | SHA-256 is ~0.3μs per call; XRPL already computes these hashes for other purposes |
| **Late-binding identifiers** | Ledger hash isn't known until after consensus — validation spans use ledger_seq as fallback, then link to the consensus trace |
---
## Distributed Traces Across Nodes
In distributed systems like xrpld, traces span **multiple independent nodes**. The trace context must be propagated in network messages:
```mermaid
sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant NodeA as Node A
participant NodeB as Node B
participant NodeC as Node C
Client->>NodeA: Submit TX<br/>(no trace context)
Note over NodeA: Creates new trace<br/>trace_id: abc123<br/>span: tx.receive
NodeA->>NodeB: Relay TX<br/>(trace_id: abc123, parent: 001)
Note over NodeB: Creates child span<br/>span: tx.relay<br/>parent_span_id: 001
NodeA->>NodeC: Relay TX<br/>(trace_id: abc123, parent: 001)
Note over NodeC: Creates child span<br/>span: tx.relay<br/>parent_span_id: 001
Note over NodeA,NodeC: All spans share trace_id: abc123<br/>enabling correlation across nodes
```
**Reading the diagram:**
- **Client**: The external entity that submits a transaction. It does not carry trace context -- the trace originates at the first node.
- **Node A**: The entry point that creates a new trace (trace_id: abc123) and the root span `tx.receive`. It relays the transaction to peers with trace context attached.
- **Node B and Node C**: Peer nodes that receive the relayed transaction along with the propagated trace context. Each creates a child span under Node A's span, preserving the same `trace_id`.
- **Arrows with trace context**: The relay messages carry `trace_id` and `parent_span_id`, allowing each downstream node to link its spans back to the originating span on Node A.
---
## Context Propagation
For traces to work across nodes, **trace context must be propagated** in messages.
### What's in the Context (~26 bytes)
| Field | Size | Description |
| ------------- | -------- | ------------------------------------------------------- |
| `trace_id` | 16 bytes | Identifies the entire trace (constant across all nodes) |
| `span_id` | 8 bytes | The sender's current span (becomes parent on receiver) |
| `trace_flags` | 1 byte | Sampling decision (bit 0 = sampled; bits 1-7 reserved) |
| `trace_state` | variable | Optional vendor-specific data (typically omitted) |
### How span_id Changes at Each Hop
Only **one** `span_id` travels in the context - the sender's current span. Each node:
1. Extracts the received `span_id` and uses it as the `parent_span_id`
2. Creates a **new** `span_id` for its own span
3. Sends its own `span_id` as the parent when forwarding
```
Node A Node B Node C
────── ────── ──────
Span AAA Span BBB Span CCC
│ │ │
▼ ▼ ▼
Context out: Context out: Context out:
├─ trace_id: abc123 ├─ trace_id: abc123 ├─ trace_id: abc123
├─ span_id: AAA ──────────► ├─ span_id: BBB ──────────► ├─ span_id: CCC ──────►
└─ flags: 01 └─ flags: 01 └─ flags: 01
│ │
parent = AAA parent = BBB
```
The `trace_id` stays constant, but `span_id` **changes at every hop** to maintain the parent-child chain.
### Propagation Formats
There are two patterns:
### HTTP/RPC Headers (W3C Trace Context)
```
traceparent: 00-4bf92f3577b34da6a3ce929d0e0e4736-00f067aa0ba902b7-01
│ │ │ │
│ │ │ └── Flags (sampled)
│ │ └── Parent span ID (16 hex)
│ └── Trace ID (32 hex)
└── Version
```
### Protocol Buffers (xrpld P2P messages)
```protobuf
message TMTransaction {
bytes rawTransaction = 1;
// ... existing fields ...
// Trace context extension
bytes trace_parent = 100; // W3C traceparent
bytes trace_state = 101; // W3C tracestate
}
```
---
## Sampling
Not every trace needs to be recorded. **Sampling** reduces overhead:
### Head Sampling (at trace start)
```
Request arrives → Random 10% chance → Record or skip entire trace
```
- ✅ Low overhead
- ❌ May miss interesting traces
### Tail Sampling (after trace completes)
```
Trace completes → Collector evaluates:
- Error? → KEEP
- Slow? → KEEP
- Normal? → Sample 10%
```
- ✅ Never loses important traces
- ❌ Higher memory usage at collector
---
## Key Benefits for xrpld
| Challenge | How Tracing Helps |
| ---------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------- |
| "Where is my transaction?" | Follow trace across all nodes it touched |
| "Why was consensus slow?" | See timing breakdown of each phase |
| "Which node is the bottleneck?" | Compare span durations across nodes |
| "What happened during the outage?" | Correlate errors across the network |
---
## Glossary
| Term | Definition |
| -------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| **Trace** | Complete journey of a request, identified by `trace_id` |
| **Span** | Single operation within a trace |
| **Parent-Child** | Span relationship where the parent depends on the child |
| **Follows-From** | Causal relationship where originator doesn't wait for the result |
| **Span Link** | Non-hierarchical connection between spans, possibly across traces |
| **Deterministic ID** | Trace ID derived from domain data (e.g., tx_hash) instead of random |
| **Context** | Data propagated between services (`trace_id`, `span_id`, flags) |
| **Instrumentation** | Code that creates spans and propagates context |
| **Collector** | Service that receives, processes, and exports traces |
| **Backend** | Storage/visualization system (Tempo) |
| **Head Sampling** | Sampling decision at trace start |
| **Tail Sampling** | Sampling decision after trace completes |
---
_Next: [Architecture Analysis](./01-architecture-analysis.md)_ | _Back to: [Overview](./OpenTelemetryPlan.md)_

View File

@@ -1,467 +0,0 @@
# Architecture Analysis
> **Parent Document**: [OpenTelemetryPlan.md](./OpenTelemetryPlan.md)
> **Related**: [Design Decisions](./02-design-decisions.md) | [Implementation Strategy](./03-implementation-strategy.md)
---
## 1.1 Current xrpld Architecture Overview
> **WS** = WebSocket | **UNL** = Unique Node List | **TxQ** = Transaction Queue | **StatsD** = Statistics Daemon
The xrpld node software consists of several interconnected components that need instrumentation for distributed tracing:
```mermaid
flowchart TB
subgraph xrpld["xrpld Node"]
subgraph services["Core Services"]
RPC["RPC Server<br/>(HTTP/WS/gRPC)"]
Overlay["Overlay<br/>(P2P Network)"]
Consensus["Consensus<br/>(RCLConsensus)"]
ValidatorList["ValidatorList<br/>(UNL Mgmt)"]
end
JobQueue["JobQueue<br/>(Thread Pool)"]
subgraph processing["Processing Layer"]
NetworkOPs["NetworkOPs<br/>(Tx Processing)"]
LedgerMaster["LedgerMaster<br/>(Ledger Mgmt)"]
NodeStore["NodeStore<br/>(Database)"]
InboundLedgers["InboundLedgers<br/>(Ledger Sync)"]
end
subgraph appservices["Application Services"]
PathFind["PathFinding<br/>(Payment Paths)"]
TxQ["TxQ<br/>(Fee Escalation)"]
LoadMgr["LoadManager<br/>(Fee/Load)"]
end
subgraph observability["Existing Observability"]
PerfLog["PerfLog<br/>(JSON)"]
Insight["Insight<br/>(StatsD)"]
Logging["Logging<br/>(Journal)"]
end
services --> JobQueue
JobQueue --> processing
JobQueue --> appservices
end
style xrpld fill:#424242,stroke:#212121,color:#ffffff
style services fill:#1565c0,stroke:#0d47a1,color:#ffffff
style processing fill:#2e7d32,stroke:#1b5e20,color:#ffffff
style appservices fill:#6a1b9a,stroke:#4a148c,color:#ffffff
style observability fill:#e65100,stroke:#bf360c,color:#ffffff
```
**Reading the diagram:**
- **Core Services (blue)**: The entry points into xrpld -- RPC Server handles client requests, Overlay manages peer-to-peer networking, Consensus drives agreement, and ValidatorList manages trusted validators.
- **JobQueue (center)**: The asynchronous thread pool that decouples Core Services from the Processing and Application layers. All work flows through it.
- **Processing Layer (green)**: Core business logic -- NetworkOPs processes transactions, LedgerMaster manages ledger state, NodeStore handles persistence, and InboundLedgers synchronizes missing data.
- **Application Services (purple)**: Higher-level features -- PathFinding computes payment routes, TxQ manages fee-based queuing, and LoadManager tracks server load.
- **Existing Observability (orange)**: The current monitoring stack (PerfLog, Insight, Journal logging) that OpenTelemetry will complement, not replace.
- **Arrows (Services to JobQueue to layers)**: Work originates at Core Services, is enqueued onto the JobQueue, and dispatched to Processing or Application layers for execution.
---
## 1.1.1 Actors and Actions
### Actors
| Who (Plain English) | Technical Term |
| ----------------------------------------- | -------------------------- |
| Network node running XRPL software | xrpld node |
| External client submitting requests | RPC Client |
| Network neighbor sharing data | Peer (PeerImp) |
| Request handler for client queries | RPC Server (ServerHandler) |
| Command executor for specific RPC methods | RPCHandler |
| Agreement process between nodes | Consensus (RCLConsensus) |
| Transaction processing coordinator | NetworkOPs |
| Background task scheduler | JobQueue |
| Ledger state manager | LedgerMaster |
| Payment route calculator | PathFinding (Pathfinder) |
| Transaction waiting room | TxQ (Transaction Queue) |
| Fee adjustment system | LoadManager |
| Trusted validator list manager | ValidatorList |
| Protocol upgrade tracker | AmendmentTable |
| Ledger state hash tree | SHAMap |
| Persistent key-value storage | NodeStore |
### Actions
| What Happens (Plain English) | Technical Term |
| ---------------------------------------------- | ---------------------- |
| Client sends a request to a node | `rpc.request` |
| Node executes a specific RPC command | `rpc.command.*` |
| Node receives a transaction from a peer | `tx.receive` |
| Node checks if a transaction is valid | `tx.validate` |
| Node forwards a transaction to neighbors | `tx.relay` |
| Nodes agree on which transactions to include | `consensus.round` |
| Consensus progresses through phases | `consensus.phase.*` |
| Node builds a new confirmed ledger | `ledger.build` |
| Node fetches missing ledger data from peers | `ledger.acquire` |
| Node computes payment routes | `pathfind.compute` |
| Node queues a transaction for later processing | `txq.enqueue` |
| Node increases fees due to high load | `fee.escalate` |
| Node fetches the latest trusted validator list | `validator.list.fetch` |
| Node votes on a protocol amendment | `amendment.vote` |
| Node synchronizes state tree data | `shamap.sync` |
---
## 1.2 Key Components for Instrumentation
> **TxQ** = Transaction Queue | **UNL** = Unique Node List
| Component | Location | Purpose | Trace Value |
| ------------------ | ------------------------------------------ | ------------------------ | -------------------------------- |
| **Overlay** | `src/xrpld/overlay/` | P2P communication | Message propagation timing |
| **PeerImp** | `src/xrpld/overlay/detail/PeerImp.cpp` | Individual peer handling | Per-peer latency |
| **RCLConsensus** | `src/xrpld/app/consensus/RCLConsensus.cpp` | Consensus algorithm | Round timing, phase analysis |
| **NetworkOPs** | `src/xrpld/app/misc/NetworkOPs.cpp` | Transaction processing | Tx lifecycle tracking |
| **ServerHandler** | `src/xrpld/rpc/detail/ServerHandler.cpp` | RPC entry point | Request latency |
| **RPCHandler** | `src/xrpld/rpc/detail/RPCHandler.cpp` | Command execution | Per-command timing |
| **JobQueue** | `src/xrpl/core/JobQueue.h` | Async task execution | Queue wait times |
| **PathFinding** | `src/xrpld/app/paths/` | Payment path computation | Path latency, cache hits |
| **TxQ** | `src/xrpld/app/misc/TxQ.cpp` | Transaction queue/fees | Queue depth, eviction rates |
| **LoadManager** | `src/xrpld/app/main/LoadManager.cpp` | Fee escalation/load | Fee levels, load factors |
| **InboundLedgers** | `src/xrpld/app/ledger/InboundLedgers.cpp` | Ledger acquisition | Sync time, peer reliability |
| **ValidatorList** | `src/xrpld/app/misc/ValidatorList.cpp` | UNL management | List freshness, fetch failures |
| **AmendmentTable** | `src/xrpld/app/misc/AmendmentTable.cpp` | Protocol amendments | Voting status, activation events |
| **SHAMap** | `src/xrpld/shamap/` | State hash tree | Sync speed, missing nodes |
---
## 1.3 Transaction Flow Diagram
Transaction flow spans multiple nodes in the network. Each node creates linked spans to form a distributed trace:
```mermaid
sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant PeerA as Peer A (Receive)
participant PeerB as Peer B (Relay)
participant PeerC as Peer C (Validate)
Client->>PeerA: 1. Submit TX
rect rgb(230, 245, 255)
Note over PeerA: tx.receive SPAN START
PeerA->>PeerA: HashRouter Deduplication
PeerA->>PeerA: tx.validate (child span)
end
PeerA->>PeerB: 2. Relay TX (with trace ctx)
rect rgb(230, 245, 255)
Note over PeerB: tx.receive (linked span)
end
PeerB->>PeerC: 3. Relay TX
rect rgb(230, 245, 255)
Note over PeerC: tx.receive (linked span)
PeerC->>PeerC: tx.process
end
Note over Client,PeerC: DISTRIBUTED TRACE (same trace_id: abc123)
```
**Reading the diagram:**
- **Client**: The external entity that submits a transaction to Peer A. It has no trace context -- the trace starts at the first node.
- **Peer A (Receive)**: The entry node that creates the root span `tx.receive`, runs HashRouter deduplication to avoid processing duplicates, and creates a child `tx.validate` span.
- **Peer A to Peer B arrow**: The relay message carries trace context (trace_id + parent span_id), enabling Peer B to create a linked span under the same trace.
- **Peer B (Relay)**: Receives the transaction and trace context, creates a `tx.receive` span linked to Peer A's trace, then relays onward.
- **Peer C (Validate)**: Final hop in this example. Creates a linked `tx.receive` span and runs `tx.process` to fully process the transaction.
- **Blue rectangles**: Highlight the span boundaries on each node, showing where instrumentation creates and closes spans.
### Trace Structure
```
trace_id: abc123
├── span: tx.receive (Peer A)
│ ├── span: tx.validate
│ └── span: tx.relay
├── span: tx.receive (Peer B) [parent: Peer A]
│ └── span: tx.relay
└── span: tx.receive (Peer C) [parent: Peer B]
└── span: tx.process
```
---
## 1.4 Consensus Round Flow
Consensus rounds are multi-phase operations that benefit significantly from tracing:
```mermaid
flowchart TB
subgraph round["consensus.round (root span)"]
attrs["Attributes:<br/>xrpl.consensus.ledger.seq = 12345678<br/>xrpl.consensus.mode = proposing<br/>xrpl.consensus.proposers = 35"]
subgraph open["consensus.phase.open"]
open_desc["Duration: ~3s<br/>Waiting for transactions"]
end
subgraph establish["consensus.phase.establish"]
est_attrs["proposals_received = 28<br/>disputes_resolved = 3"]
est_children["├── consensus.proposal.receive (×28)<br/>├── consensus.proposal.send (×1)<br/>└── consensus.dispute.resolve (×3)"]
end
subgraph accept["consensus.phase.accept"]
acc_attrs["transactions_applied = 150<br/>ledger.hash = DEF456..."]
acc_children["├── ledger.build<br/>└── ledger.validate"]
end
attrs --> open
open --> establish
establish --> accept
end
style round fill:#f57f17,stroke:#e65100,color:#ffffff
style open fill:#1565c0,stroke:#0d47a1,color:#ffffff
style establish fill:#2e7d32,stroke:#1b5e20,color:#ffffff
style accept fill:#c2185b,stroke:#880e4f,color:#ffffff
```
**Reading the diagram:**
- **consensus.round (orange, root span)**: The top-level span encompassing the entire consensus round, with attributes like ledger sequence, mode, and proposer count.
- **consensus.phase.open (blue)**: The first phase where the node waits (~3s) to collect incoming transactions before proposing.
- **consensus.phase.establish (green)**: The negotiation phase where validators exchange proposals, resolve disputes, and converge on a transaction set. Child spans track each proposal received/sent and each dispute resolved.
- **consensus.phase.accept (pink)**: The final phase where the agreed transaction set is applied, a new ledger is built, and the ledger is validated. Child spans cover `ledger.build` and `ledger.validate`.
- **Arrows (open to establish to accept)**: The sequential flow through the three consensus phases. Each phase must complete before the next begins.
---
## 1.5 RPC Request Flow
> **WS** = WebSocket
RPC requests support W3C Trace Context headers for distributed tracing across services:
```mermaid
flowchart TB
subgraph request["rpc.request (root span)"]
http["HTTP Request — POST /<br/>traceparent:<br/>00-abc123...-def456...-01"]
attrs["Attributes:<br/>http.method = POST<br/>net.peer.ip = 192.168.1.100<br/>command = submit"]
subgraph enqueue["jobqueue.enqueue"]
job_attr["xrpl.job.type = jtCLIENT_RPC"]
end
subgraph command["rpc.command.submit"]
cmd_attrs["version = 2<br/>rpc_role = user"]
cmd_children["├── tx.deserialize<br/>├── tx.validate_local<br/>└── tx.submit_to_network"]
end
response["Response: 200 OK<br/>Duration: 45ms"]
http --> attrs
attrs --> enqueue
enqueue --> command
command --> response
end
style request fill:#2e7d32,stroke:#1b5e20,color:#ffffff
style enqueue fill:#1565c0,stroke:#0d47a1,color:#ffffff
style command fill:#e65100,stroke:#bf360c,color:#ffffff
```
**Reading the diagram:**
- **rpc.request (green, root span)**: The outermost span representing the full RPC request lifecycle, from HTTP receipt to response. Carries the W3C `traceparent` header for distributed tracing.
- **HTTP Request node**: Shows the incoming POST request with its `traceparent` header and extracted attributes (method, peer IP, command name).
- **jobqueue.enqueue (blue)**: The span covering the asynchronous handoff from the RPC thread to the JobQueue worker thread. The trace context is preserved across this async boundary.
- **rpc.command.submit (orange)**: The span for the actual command execution, with child spans for deserialization, local validation, and network submission.
- **Response node**: The final output with HTTP status and total duration, marking the end of the root span.
- **Arrows (top to bottom)**: The sequential processing pipeline -- receive request, extract attributes, enqueue job, execute command, return response.
---
## 1.6 Key Trace Points
> **TxQ** = Transaction Queue
The following table identifies priority instrumentation points across the codebase:
| Category | Span Name | File | Method | Priority |
| --------------- | ---------------------- | ---------------------- | ----------------------- | -------- |
| **Transaction** | `tx.receive` | `PeerImp.cpp` | `handleTransaction()` | High |
| **Transaction** | `tx.validate` | `NetworkOPs.cpp` | `processTransaction()` | High |
| **Transaction** | `tx.process` | `NetworkOPs.cpp` | `doTransactionSync()` | High |
| **Transaction** | `tx.relay` | `OverlayImpl.cpp` | `relay()` | Medium |
| **Consensus** | `consensus.round` | `RCLConsensus.cpp` | `startRound()` | High |
| **Consensus** | `consensus.phase.*` | `Consensus.h` | `timerEntry()` | High |
| **Consensus** | `consensus.proposal.*` | `RCLConsensus.cpp` | `peerProposal()` | Medium |
| **RPC** | `rpc.request` | `ServerHandler.cpp` | `onRequest()` | High |
| **RPC** | `rpc.command.*` | `RPCHandler.cpp` | `doCommand()` | High |
| **Peer** | `peer.connect` | `OverlayImpl.cpp` | `onHandoff()` | Low |
| **Peer** | `peer.message.*` | `PeerImp.cpp` | `onMessage()` | Low |
| **Ledger** | `ledger.acquire` | `InboundLedgers.cpp` | `acquire()` | Medium |
| **Ledger** | `ledger.build` | `RCLConsensus.cpp` | `buildLCL()` | High |
| **PathFinding** | `pathfind.request` | `PathRequest.cpp` | `doUpdate()` | High |
| **PathFinding** | `pathfind.compute` | `Pathfinder.cpp` | `findPaths()` | High |
| **TxQ** | `txq.enqueue` | `TxQ.cpp` | `apply()` | High |
| **TxQ** | `txq.apply` | `TxQ.cpp` | `processClosedLedger()` | High |
| **Fee** | `fee.escalate` | `LoadManager.cpp` | `raiseLocalFee()` | Medium |
| **Ledger** | `ledger.replay` | `LedgerReplayer.h` | `replay()` | Medium |
| **Ledger** | `ledger.delta` | `LedgerDeltaAcquire.h` | `processData()` | Medium |
| **Validator** | `validator.list.fetch` | `ValidatorList.cpp` | `verify()` | Medium |
| **Validator** | `validator.manifest` | `Manifest.cpp` | `applyManifest()` | Low |
| **Amendment** | `amendment.vote` | `AmendmentTable.cpp` | `doVoting()` | Low |
| **SHAMap** | `shamap.sync` | `SHAMap.cpp` | `fetchRoot()` | Medium |
---
## 1.7 Instrumentation Priority
> **TxQ** = Transaction Queue
```mermaid
quadrantChart
title Instrumentation Priority Matrix
x-axis Low Complexity --> High Complexity
y-axis Low Value --> High Value
quadrant-1 Implement First
quadrant-2 Plan Carefully
quadrant-3 Quick Wins
quadrant-4 Consider Later
RPC Tracing: [0.2, 0.92]
Transaction Tracing: [0.55, 0.88]
Consensus Tracing: [0.78, 0.82]
PathFinding: [0.38, 0.75]
TxQ and Fees: [0.25, 0.65]
Ledger Sync: [0.62, 0.58]
Peer Message Tracing: [0.35, 0.25]
JobQueue Tracing: [0.2, 0.48]
Validator Mgmt: [0.48, 0.42]
Amendment Tracking: [0.15, 0.32]
SHAMap Operations: [0.72, 0.45]
```
---
## 1.8 Observable Outcomes
> **TxQ** = Transaction Queue | **UNL** = Unique Node List
After implementing OpenTelemetry, operators and developers will gain visibility into the following:
### 1.8.1 What You Will See: Traces
| Trace Type | Description | Example Query in Grafana/Tempo |
| -------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------- |
| **Transaction Lifecycle** | Full journey from RPC submission through validation, relay, consensus, and ledger inclusion | `{service.name="xrpld" && xrpl.tx.hash="ABC123..."}` |
| **Cross-Node Propagation** | Transaction path across multiple xrpld nodes with timing | `{xrpl.tx.relay_count > 0}` |
| **Consensus Rounds** | Complete round with all phases (open, establish, accept) | `{span.name=~"consensus.round.*"}` |
| **RPC Request Processing** | Individual command execution with timing breakdown | `{command="account_info"}` |
| **Ledger Acquisition** | Peer-to-peer ledger data requests and responses | `{span.name="ledger.acquire"}` |
| **PathFinding Latency** | Path computation time and cache effectiveness for payment RPCs | `{span.name="pathfind.compute"}` |
| **TxQ Behavior** | Queue depth, eviction patterns, fee escalation during congestion | `{span.name=~"txq.*"}` |
| **Ledger Sync** | Full acquisition timeline including delta and transaction fetches | `{span.name=~"ledger.acquire.*"}` |
| **Validator Health** | UNL fetch success, manifest updates, stale list detection | `{span.name=~"validator.*"}` |
### 1.8.2 What You Will See: Metrics (Derived from Traces)
| Metric | Description | Dashboard Panel |
| ----------------------------- | --------------------------------------- | --------------------------- |
| **RPC Latency (p50/p95/p99)** | Response time distribution per command | Heatmap by command |
| **Transaction Throughput** | Transactions processed per second | Time series graph |
| **Consensus Round Duration** | Time to complete consensus phases | Histogram |
| **Cross-Node Latency** | Time for transaction to reach N nodes | Line chart with percentiles |
| **Error Rate** | Failed transactions/RPC calls by type | Stacked bar chart |
| **PathFinding Latency** | Path computation time per currency pair | Heatmap by currency |
| **TxQ Depth** | Queued transactions over time | Time series with thresholds |
| **Fee Escalation Level** | Current fee multiplier | Gauge with alert thresholds |
| **Ledger Sync Duration** | Time to acquire missing ledgers | Histogram |
### 1.8.3 Concrete Dashboard Examples
**Transaction Trace View (Tempo):**
```
┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Trace: abc123... (Transaction Submission) Duration: 847ms │
├────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ ├── rpc.request [ServerHandler] ████░░░░░░ 45ms │
│ │ └── rpc.command.submit [RPCHandler] ████░░░░░░ 42ms │
│ │ └── tx.receive [NetworkOPs] ███░░░░░░░ 35ms │
│ │ ├── tx.validate [TxQ] █░░░░░░░░░ 8ms │
│ │ └── tx.relay [Overlay] ██░░░░░░░░ 15ms │
│ │ ├── tx.receive [Node-B] █████░░░░░ 52ms │
│ │ │ └── tx.relay [Node-B] ██░░░░░░░░ 18ms │
│ │ └── tx.receive [Node-C] ██████░░░░ 65ms │
│ └── consensus.round [RCLConsensus] ████████░░ 720ms │
│ ├── consensus.phase.open ██░░░░░░░░ 180ms │
│ ├── consensus.phase.establish █████░░░░░ 480ms │
│ └── consensus.phase.accept █░░░░░░░░░ 60ms │
└────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
```
**RPC Performance Dashboard Panel:**
```
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ RPC Command Latency (Last 1 Hour) │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Command │ p50 │ p95 │ p99 │ Errors │ Rate │
│──────────────────┼────────┼────────┼────────┼────────┼──────│
│ account_info │ 12ms │ 45ms │ 89ms │ 0.1% │ 150/s│
│ submit │ 35ms │ 120ms │ 250ms │ 2.3% │ 45/s│
│ ledger │ 8ms │ 25ms │ 55ms │ 0.0% │ 80/s│
│ tx │ 15ms │ 50ms │ 100ms │ 0.5% │ 60/s│
│ server_info │ 5ms │ 12ms │ 20ms │ 0.0% │ 200/s│
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
```
**Consensus Health Dashboard Panel:**
```mermaid
---
config:
xyChart:
width: 1200
height: 400
plotReservedSpacePercent: 50
chartOrientation: vertical
themeVariables:
xyChart:
plotColorPalette: "#3498db"
---
xychart-beta
title "Consensus Round Duration (Last 24 Hours)"
x-axis "Time of Day (Hours)" [0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24]
y-axis "Duration (seconds)" 1 --> 5
line [2.1, 2.4, 2.8, 3.2, 3.8, 4.3, 4.5, 5.0, 4.7, 4.0, 3.2, 2.6, 2.0]
```
### 1.8.4 Operator Actionable Insights
| Scenario | What You'll See | Action |
| ------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------ |
| **Slow RPC** | Span showing which phase is slow (parsing, execution, serialization) | Optimize specific code path |
| **Transaction Stuck** | Trace stops at validation; error attribute shows reason | Fix transaction parameters |
| **Consensus Delay** | Phase.establish taking too long; proposer attribute shows missing validators | Investigate network connectivity |
| **Memory Spike** | Large batch of spans correlating with memory increase | Tune batch_size or sampling |
| **Network Partition** | Traces missing cross-node links for specific peer | Check peer connectivity |
| **Path Computation Slow** | pathfind.compute span shows high latency; cache miss rate in attributes | Warm the RippleLineCache, check order book depth |
| **TxQ Full** | txq.enqueue spans show evictions; fee.escalate spans increasing | Monitor fee levels, alert operators |
| **Ledger Sync Stalled** | ledger.acquire spans timing out; peer reliability attributes show issues | Check peer connectivity, add trusted peers |
| **UNL Stale** | validator.list.fetch spans failing; last_update attribute aging | Verify validator site URLs, check DNS |
### 1.8.5 Developer Debugging Workflow
1. **Find Transaction**: Query by `xrpl.tx.hash` to get full trace
2. **Identify Bottleneck**: Look at span durations to find slowest component
3. **Check Attributes**: Review `xrpl.tx.validity`, `rpc_status` for errors
4. **Correlate Logs**: Use `trace_id` to find related PerfLog entries
5. **Compare Nodes**: Filter by `service.instance.id` to compare behavior across nodes
---
_Next: [Design Decisions](./02-design-decisions.md)_ | _Back to: [Overview](./OpenTelemetryPlan.md)_

View File

@@ -1,714 +0,0 @@
# Design Decisions
> **Parent Document**: [OpenTelemetryPlan.md](./OpenTelemetryPlan.md)
> **Related**: [Architecture Analysis](./01-architecture-analysis.md) | [Code Samples](./04-code-samples.md)
---
## 2.1 OpenTelemetry Components
> **OTLP** = OpenTelemetry Protocol
### 2.1.1 SDK Selection
**Primary Choice**: OpenTelemetry C++ SDK (`opentelemetry-cpp`)
| Component | Purpose | Required |
| --------------------------------------- | ---------------------- | ------------------------- |
| `opentelemetry-cpp::api` | Tracing API headers | Yes |
| `opentelemetry-cpp::sdk` | SDK implementation | Yes |
| `opentelemetry-cpp::ext` | Extensions (exporters) | Yes |
| `opentelemetry-cpp::otlp_http_exporter` | OTLP/HTTP export | Yes (shipped in Phase 1b) |
| `opentelemetry-cpp::otlp_grpc_exporter` | OTLP/gRPC export | Future (not yet wired up) |
### 2.1.2 Instrumentation Strategy
**Manual Instrumentation** (recommended):
| Approach | Pros | Cons |
| ---------- | --------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------- |
| **Manual** | Precise control, optimized placement, xrpld-specific attributes | More development effort |
| **Auto** | Less code, automatic coverage | Less control, potential overhead, limited customization |
---
## 2.2 Exporter Configuration
> **OTLP** = OpenTelemetry Protocol
```mermaid
flowchart TB
subgraph nodes["xrpld Nodes"]
node1["xrpld<br/>Node 1"]
node2["xrpld<br/>Node 2"]
node3["xrpld<br/>Node 3"]
end
collector["OpenTelemetry<br/>Collector<br/>(sidecar or standalone)"]
subgraph backends["Observability Backends"]
tempo["Tempo"]
elastic["Elastic<br/>APM"]
end
node1 -->|"OTLP/HTTP<br/>:4318"| collector
node2 -->|"OTLP/HTTP<br/>:4318"| collector
node3 -->|"OTLP/HTTP<br/>:4318"| collector
collector --> tempo
collector --> elastic
style nodes fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#ffffff
style backends fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#ffffff
style collector fill:#bf360c,stroke:#8c2809,color:#ffffff
```
**Reading the diagram:**
- **xrpld Nodes (blue)**: The source of telemetry data. Each xrpld node exports spans via OTLP/HTTP on port 4318 (the only exporter shipped in Phase 1b).
- **OpenTelemetry Collector (red)**: The central aggregation point that receives spans from all nodes. Can run as a sidecar (per-node) or standalone (shared). Handles batching, filtering, and routing.
- **Observability Backends (green)**: The storage and visualization destinations. Tempo is the recommended backend for both development and production, and Elastic APM is an alternative. The Collector routes to one or more backends.
- **Arrows (nodes to collector to backends)**: The data pipeline -- spans flow from nodes to the Collector over HTTP, then the Collector fans out to the configured backends.
### 2.2.1 OTLP/HTTP (Shipped in Phase 1b)
```cpp
// Configuration for OTLP over HTTP (the only exporter currently wired up).
namespace otlp = opentelemetry::exporter::otlp;
otlp::OtlpHttpExporterOptions opts;
opts.url = "http://localhost:4318/v1/traces";
opts.content_type = otlp::HttpRequestContentType::kJson; // or kBinary
```
### 2.2.2 OTLP/gRPC (Future Work — Planned Upgrade)
OTLP/gRPC is planned as a future upgrade from the HTTP exporter. The gRPC
transport offers lower per-span overhead and tighter back-pressure semantics
than HTTP/JSON, making it attractive for production deployments once the HTTP
path is validated in earlier phases.
Required to land this upgrade:
1. Add `opentelemetry-cpp::otlp_grpc_exporter` to the Conan recipe (the
dependency already exists but is not linked in Phase 1b builds).
2. Extend `TelemetryConfig.cpp` to parse an `exporter` key (`otlp_http`
default, `otlp_grpc` opt-in) and a gRPC endpoint override.
3. In `Telemetry::start()` branch on the parsed exporter type and construct
either `OtlpHttpExporterFactory::Create(httpOpts)` or
`OtlpGrpcExporterFactory::Create(grpcOpts)` accordingly.
4. Update the runbook and dashboards to document the alternate port and TLS
settings.
Example Phase 1b+ gRPC configuration (when wired up):
```cpp
// Configuration for OTLP over gRPC (future work).
namespace otlp = opentelemetry::exporter::otlp;
otlp::OtlpGrpcExporterOptions opts;
opts.endpoint = "<otel-collector-host>:4317";
opts.use_ssl_credentials = true;
opts.ssl_credentials_cacert_path = "/path/to/ca.crt";
```
Until that work lands, `OtlpGrpcExporterOptions` is **not** used by any code
path in Phase 1b through Phase 5.
---
## 2.3 Span Naming Conventions
> **TxQ** = Transaction Queue | **UNL** = Unique Node List | **WS** = WebSocket
### 2.3.1 Naming Schema
```
<component>.<operation>[.<sub-operation>]
```
**Examples**:
- `tx.receive` - Transaction received from peer
- `consensus.phase.establish` - Consensus establish phase
- `rpc.command.server_info` - server_info RPC command
### 2.3.2 Complete Span Catalog
```yaml
# Transaction Spans
tx:
receive: "Transaction received from network"
validate: "Transaction signature/format validation"
process: "Full transaction processing"
relay: "Transaction relay to peers"
apply: "Apply transaction to ledger"
# Consensus Spans
consensus:
round: "Complete consensus round"
phase:
open: "Open phase - collecting transactions"
establish: "Establish phase - reaching agreement"
accept: "Accept phase - applying consensus"
proposal:
receive: "Receive peer proposal"
send: "Send our proposal"
validation:
receive: "Receive peer validation"
send: "Send our validation"
# RPC Spans
rpc:
request: "HTTP/WebSocket request handling"
command:
"*": "Specific RPC command (dynamic)"
# Peer Spans
peer:
connect: "Peer connection establishment"
disconnect: "Peer disconnection"
message:
send: "Send protocol message"
receive: "Receive protocol message"
# Ledger Spans
ledger:
acquire: "Ledger acquisition from network"
build: "Build new ledger"
validate: "Ledger validation"
close: "Close ledger"
replay: "Ledger replay executed"
delta: "Delta-based ledger acquired"
# PathFinding Spans
pathfind:
request: "Path request initiated"
compute: "Path computation executed"
# TxQ Spans
txq:
enqueue: "Transaction queued"
apply: "Queued transaction applied"
# Fee/Load Spans
fee:
escalate: "Fee escalation triggered"
# Validator Spans
validator:
list:
fetch: "UNL list fetched"
manifest: "Manifest update processed"
# Amendment Spans
amendment:
vote: "Amendment voting executed"
# SHAMap Spans
shamap:
sync: "State tree synchronization"
# Job Spans
job:
enqueue: "Job added to queue"
execute: "Job execution"
```
---
## 2.4 Attribute Schema
> **TxQ** = Transaction Queue | **UNL** = Unique Node List | **OTLP** = OpenTelemetry Protocol
### 2.4.1 Resource Attributes (Set Once at Startup)
```cpp
// Standard OpenTelemetry semantic conventions
resource::SemanticConventions::SERVICE_NAME = "xrpld"
resource::SemanticConventions::SERVICE_VERSION = BuildInfo::getVersionString()
resource::SemanticConventions::SERVICE_INSTANCE_ID = <node_public_key_base58>
// Custom xrpld attributes
"xrpl.network.id" = <network_id> // e.g., 0 for mainnet
"xrpl.network.type" = "mainnet" | "testnet" | "devnet" | "standalone"
"xrpl.node.type" = "validator" | "stock" | "reporting"
"xrpl.node.cluster" = <cluster_name> // If clustered
```
### 2.4.2 Span Attributes by Category
#### Transaction Attributes
```cpp
"xrpl.tx.hash" = string // Transaction hash (hex)
"xrpl.tx.type" = string // "Payment", "OfferCreate", etc.
"xrpl.tx.account" = string // Source account (redacted in prod)
"xrpl.tx.sequence" = int64 // Account sequence number
"xrpl.tx.fee" = int64 // Fee in drops
"xrpl.tx.result" = string // "tesSUCCESS", "tecPATH_DRY", etc.
"xrpl.tx.ledger_index" = int64 // Ledger containing transaction
```
#### Consensus Attributes
```cpp
"xrpl.consensus.round" = int64 // Round number
"xrpl.consensus.phase" = string // "open", "establish", "accept"
"xrpl.consensus.mode" = string // "proposing", "observing", etc.
"xrpl.consensus.proposers" = int64 // Number of proposers
"xrpl.consensus.ledger.prev" = string // Previous ledger hash
"xrpl.consensus.ledger.seq" = int64 // Ledger sequence
"xrpl.consensus.tx_count" = int64 // Transactions in consensus set
"xrpl.consensus.duration_ms" = float64 // Round duration
```
#### RPC Attributes
```cpp
"command" = string // Command name
"version" = int64 // API version
"rpc_role" = string // "admin" or "user"
"xrpl.rpc.params" = string // Sanitized parameters (optional, planned)
```
#### Peer & Message Attributes
```cpp
"xrpl.peer.id" = string // Peer public key (base58)
"xrpl.peer.address" = string // IP:port
"xrpl.peer.latency_ms" = float64 // Measured latency
"xrpl.peer.cluster" = string // Cluster name if clustered
"xrpl.message.type" = string // Protocol message type name
"xrpl.message.size_bytes" = int64 // Message size
"xrpl.message.compressed" = bool // Whether compressed
```
#### Ledger & Job Attributes
```cpp
"xrpl.ledger.hash" = string // Ledger hash
"xrpl.ledger.index" = int64 // Ledger sequence/index
"xrpl.ledger.close_time" = int64 // Close time (epoch)
"xrpl.ledger.tx_count" = int64 // Transaction count
"xrpl.job.type" = string // Job type name
"xrpl.job.queue_ms" = float64 // Time spent in queue
"xrpl.job.worker" = int64 // Worker thread ID
```
#### PathFinding Attributes
```cpp
"source_currency" = string // Source currency code (planned, not yet implemented)
"dest_currency" = string // Destination currency code (planned, not yet implemented)
"path_count" = int64 // Number of paths found (planned, not yet implemented)
"cache_hit" = bool // RippleLineCache hit (planned, not yet implemented)
```
#### TxQ Attributes
```cpp
"xrpl.txq.queue_depth" = int64 // Current queue depth
"xrpl.txq.fee_level" = int64 // Fee level of transaction
"xrpl.txq.eviction_reason" = string // Why transaction was evicted
```
#### Fee Attributes
```cpp
"xrpl.fee.load_factor" = int64 // Current load factor
"xrpl.fee.escalation_level" = int64 // Fee escalation multiplier
```
#### Validator Attributes
```cpp
"xrpl.validator.list_size" = int64 // UNL size
"xrpl.validator.list_age_sec" = int64 // Seconds since last update
```
#### Amendment Attributes
```cpp
"xrpl.amendment.name" = string // Amendment name
"xrpl.amendment.status" = string // "enabled", "vetoed", "supported"
```
#### SHAMap Attributes
```cpp
"xrpl.shamap.type" = string // "transaction", "state", "account_state"
"xrpl.shamap.missing_nodes" = int64 // Number of missing nodes during sync
"xrpl.shamap.duration_ms" = float64 // Sync duration
```
### 2.4.3 Data Collection Summary
The following table summarizes what data is collected by category:
| Category | Attributes Collected | Purpose |
| --------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------- |
| **Transaction** | `tx.hash`, `tx.type`, `tx.result`, `tx.fee`, `ledger_index` | Trace transaction lifecycle |
| **Consensus** | `round`, `phase`, `mode`, `proposers` (public keys), `duration_ms` | Analyze consensus timing |
| **RPC** | `command`, `version`, `status`, `duration_ms` | Monitor RPC performance |
| **Peer** | `peer.id` (public key), `latency_ms`, `message.type`, `message.size` | Network topology analysis |
| **Ledger** | `ledger.hash`, `ledger.index`, `close_time`, `tx_count` | Ledger progression tracking |
| **Job** | `job.type`, `queue_ms`, `worker` | JobQueue performance |
| **PathFinding** | `pathfind_fast`, `pathfind_search_level`, `pathfind_num_paths`, `pathfind_ledger_index`, `pathfind_num_requests` | Payment path analysis |
| **TxQ** | `txq.queue_depth`, `fee_level`, `eviction_reason` | Queue depth and fee tracking |
| **Fee** | `fee.load_factor`, `escalation_level` | Fee escalation monitoring |
| **Validator** | `validator.list_size`, `list_age_sec` | UNL health monitoring |
| **Amendment** | `amendment.name`, `status` | Protocol upgrade tracking |
| **SHAMap** | `shamap.type`, `missing_nodes`, `duration_ms` | State tree sync performance |
### 2.4.4 Privacy & Sensitive Data Policy
> **PII** = Personally Identifiable Information
OpenTelemetry instrumentation is designed to collect **operational metadata only**, never sensitive content.
#### Data NOT Collected
The following data is explicitly **excluded** from telemetry collection:
| Excluded Data | Reason |
| ----------------------- | ----------------------------------------- |
| **Private Keys** | Never exposed; not relevant to tracing |
| **Account Balances** | Financial data; privacy sensitive |
| **Transaction Amounts** | Financial data; privacy sensitive |
| **Raw TX Payloads** | May contain sensitive memo/data fields |
| **Personal Data** | No PII collected |
| **IP Addresses** | Configurable; excluded by default in prod |
#### Privacy Protection Mechanisms
| Mechanism | Description |
| ----------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| **Account Hashing** | `xrpl.tx.account` is hashed at collector level before storage |
| **Configurable Redaction** | Sensitive fields can be excluded via `[telemetry]` config section |
| **Sampling** | Only 10% of traces recorded by default, reducing data exposure |
| **Local Control** | Node operators have full control over what gets exported |
| **No Raw Payloads** | Transaction content is never recorded, only metadata (hash, type, result) |
| **Collector-Level Filtering** | Additional redaction/hashing can be configured at OTel Collector |
#### Collector-Level Data Protection
The OpenTelemetry Collector can be configured to hash or redact sensitive attributes before export:
```yaml
processors:
attributes:
actions:
# Hash account addresses before storage
- key: xrpl.tx.account
action: hash
# Remove IP addresses entirely
- key: xrpl.peer.address
action: delete
# Redact specific fields
- key: xrpl.rpc.params
action: delete
```
#### Configuration Options for Privacy
In `xrpld.cfg`, operators can control data collection granularity:
```ini
[telemetry]
enabled=1
# Disable collection of specific components
trace_transactions=1
trace_consensus=1
trace_rpc=1
trace_peer=0 # Disable peer tracing (high volume, includes addresses)
# Redact specific attributes
redact_account=1 # Hash account addresses before export
redact_peer_address=1 # Remove peer IP addresses
```
> **Note**: The `redact_account` configuration in `xrpld.cfg` controls SDK-level redaction before export, while collector-level filtering (see [Collector-Level Data Protection](#collector-level-data-protection) above) provides an additional defense-in-depth layer. Both can operate independently.
> **Key Principle**: Telemetry collects **operational metadata** (timing, counts, hashes) — never **sensitive content** (keys, balances, amounts, raw payloads).
> **See also**: [Securing the OTel Pipeline](./secure-OTel.md) covers transport-level protection for telemetry leaving the node — mTLS to the collector and validation of incoming peer trace context. Privacy controls in this section keep sensitive data out of spans; the security doc keeps the spans themselves out of untrusted hands.
---
## 2.5 Context Propagation Design
> **WS** = WebSocket
### 2.5.0 Deterministic Trace ID Strategy
Both transaction and consensus tracing use **deterministic trace IDs** derived from
a globally known hash, so all nodes handling the same workflow independently produce
spans under the same `trace_id`. This is combined with protobuf `span_id` propagation
for parent-child relay ordering when available.
#### Transactions — `trace_id = txHash[0:16]`
Every node that handles a transaction knows its `txID` (the `uint256` transaction
hash). The first 16 bytes of this hash are used as the OTel `trace_id`:
```
uint256 txHash: A1B2C3D4 E5F6A7B8 C9D0E1F2 A3B4C5D6 E7F8A9B0 C1D2E3F4 A5B6C7D8 E9F0A1B2
|---------- trace_id (16 bytes) ---------| (remaining 16 bytes unused)
```
Each node generates a **random 8-byte `span_id`** so its span is unique within the
shared trace. When protobuf `TraceContext` is present in the incoming `TMTransaction`,
the sender's `span_id` is extracted and used as the parent — preserving the relay
chain as a parent-child tree. When absent (older peers, first hop from client), the
span appears as a root in the same trace — correlation is preserved, only the tree
structure degrades.
```
Node A (submitter) Node B (relay) Node C (relay)
trace_id: A1B2... trace_id: A1B2... trace_id: A1B2...
span_id: 1234 (random) span_id: 5678 (random) span_id: 9ABC (random)
parent: (none) parent: 1234 (proto) parent: 5678 (proto)
↑ ↑
protobuf propagation protobuf propagation
```
If protobuf propagation fails at Node B (old peer):
```
Node A Node B (old peer) Node C
trace_id: A1B2... trace_id: A1B2... trace_id: A1B2...
span_id: 1234 span_id: 5678 span_id: 9ABC
parent: (none) parent: (none) parent: 5678 (proto)
↑ no parent, but same trace_id — still grouped
```
#### Consensus — `trace_id = prevLedgerHash[0:16]`
All validators in the same consensus round share the same `previousLedger.id()`.
The first 16 bytes are used as trace_id. See [Phase 4a implementation status](./06-implementation-phases.md)
and `createDeterministicContext()` in `RCLConsensus.cpp` for the implementation.
Switchable via `consensus_trace_strategy` config:
`"deterministic"` (default) or `"attribute"` (random trace_id, correlation via attribute queries).
#### Why Not Random IDs with Propagation Only?
Random trace IDs require **unbroken context propagation** across every hop. In a
mixed-version network (common during upgrades), older peers silently drop the
`trace_context` protobuf field. The trace splits and downstream spans become
impossible to find. Deterministic IDs make correlation **propagation-resilient** — the trace
backend groups all spans for the same transaction/round regardless of whether
propagation succeeded.
#### Why Keep Protobuf Propagation?
Deterministic trace IDs alone provide correlation (all spans grouped) but not
**causality** (which node relayed to which). Protobuf `span_id` propagation adds
parent-child ordering that shows the exact relay path. The two mechanisms complement
each other:
| Mechanism | Provides | Fails when |
| ---------------------------- | --------------------------- | -------------------------------------- |
| Deterministic trace_id | Cross-node correlation | Never (hash is always known) |
| Protobuf span_id propagation | Parent-child relay ordering | Older peer drops `trace_context` field |
#### Implementation Reference
The utility function `createDeterministicTxContext(uint256 const& txHash)` follows
the same pattern as `createDeterministicContext(uint256 const& ledgerId)` in
`RCLConsensus.cpp`. See [Phase 3 Task 3.9](./Phase3_taskList.md) for the full spec.
### 2.5.1 Propagation Boundaries
```mermaid
flowchart TB
subgraph http["HTTP/WebSocket (RPC)"]
w3c["W3C Trace Context Headers:<br/>traceparent:<br/>00-trace_id-span_id-flags<br/>tracestate: xrpld=..."]
end
subgraph protobuf["Protocol Buffers (P2P)"]
proto["message TraceContext {<br/> bytes trace_id = 1; // 16 bytes<br/> bytes span_id = 2; // 8 bytes<br/> uint32 trace_flags = 3;<br/> string trace_state = 4;<br/>}"]
end
subgraph jobqueue["JobQueue (Internal Async)"]
job["Context captured at job creation,<br/>restored at execution<br/><br/>class Job {<br/> otel::context::Context<br/> traceContext_;<br/>};"]
end
style http fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#ffffff
style protobuf fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#ffffff
style jobqueue fill:#bf360c,stroke:#8c2809,color:#ffffff
```
**Reading the diagram:**
- **HTTP/WebSocket - RPC (blue)**: For client-facing RPC requests, trace context is propagated using the W3C `traceparent` header. This is the standard approach and works with any OTel-compatible client.
- **Protocol Buffers - P2P (green)**: For peer-to-peer messages between xrpld nodes, trace context is embedded as a protobuf `TraceContext` message carrying trace_id, span_id, flags, and optional trace_state.
- **JobQueue - Internal Async (red)**: For asynchronous work within a single node, the OTel context is captured when a job is created and restored when the job executes on a worker thread. This bridges the async gap so spans remain linked.
---
## 2.6 Integration with Existing Observability
> **OTLP** = OpenTelemetry Protocol | **WS** = WebSocket
### 2.6.1 Existing Frameworks Comparison
xrpld already has two observability mechanisms. OpenTelemetry complements (not replaces) them:
| Aspect | PerfLog | Beast Insight (StatsD) | OpenTelemetry |
| --------------------- | ----------------------------- | ---------------------------- | ------------------------- |
| **Type** | Logging | Metrics | Distributed Tracing |
| **Data** | JSON log entries | Counters, gauges, histograms | Spans with context |
| **Scope** | Single node | Single node | **Cross-node** |
| **Output** | `perf.log` file | StatsD server | OTLP Collector |
| **Question answered** | "What happened on this node?" | "How many? How fast?" | "What was the journey?" |
| **Correlation** | By timestamp | By metric name | By `trace_id` |
| **Overhead** | Low (file I/O) | Low (UDP packets) | Low-Medium (configurable) |
### 2.6.2 What Each Framework Does Best
#### PerfLog
- **Purpose**: Detailed local event logging for RPC and job execution
- **Strengths**:
- Rich JSON output with timing data
- Already integrated in RPC handlers
- File-based, no external dependencies
- **Limitations**:
- Single-node only (no cross-node correlation)
- No parent-child relationships between events
- Manual log parsing required
```json
// Example PerfLog entry
{
"time": "2024-01-15T10:30:00.123Z",
"method": "submit",
"duration_us": 1523,
"result": "tesSUCCESS"
}
```
#### Beast Insight (StatsD)
- **Purpose**: Real-time metrics for monitoring dashboards
- **Strengths**:
- Aggregated metrics (counters, gauges, histograms)
- Low overhead (UDP, fire-and-forget)
- Good for alerting thresholds
- **Limitations**:
- No request-level detail
- No causal relationships
- Single-node perspective
```cpp
// Example StatsD usage in xrpld
insight.increment("rpc.submit.count");
insight.gauge("ledger.age", age);
insight.timing("consensus.round", duration);
```
#### OpenTelemetry (NEW)
- **Purpose**: Distributed request tracing across nodes
- **Strengths**:
- **Cross-node correlation** via `trace_id`
- Parent-child span relationships
- Rich attributes per span
- Industry standard (CNCF)
- **Limitations**:
- Requires collector infrastructure
- Higher complexity than logging
```cpp
// Example OpenTelemetry span
auto span = telemetry.startSpan("tx.relay");
span->SetAttribute("tx.hash", hash);
span->SetAttribute("peer.id", peerId);
// Span automatically linked to parent via context
```
### 2.6.3 When to Use Each
| Scenario | PerfLog | StatsD | OpenTelemetry |
| --------------------------------------- | ---------- | ------ | ------------- |
| "How many TXs per second?" | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ |
| "What's the p99 RPC latency?" | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ |
| "Why was this specific TX slow?" | ⚠️ partial | ❌ | ✅ |
| "Which node delayed consensus?" | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ |
| "What happened on node X at time T?" | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ |
| "Show me the TX journey across 5 nodes" | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ |
### 2.6.4 Coexistence Strategy
```mermaid
flowchart TB
subgraph xrpld["xrpld Process"]
perflog["PerfLog<br/>(JSON to file)"]
insight["Beast Insight<br/>(StatsD)"]
otel["OpenTelemetry<br/>(Tracing)"]
end
perflog --> perffile["perf.log"]
insight --> statsd["StatsD Server"]
otel --> collector["OTLP Collector"]
perffile --> grafana["Grafana<br/>(Unified UI)"]
statsd --> grafana
collector --> grafana
style xrpld fill:#212121,stroke:#0a0a0a,color:#ffffff
style grafana fill:#bf360c,stroke:#8c2809,color:#ffffff
```
**Reading the diagram:**
- **xrpld Process (dark gray)**: The single xrpld node running all three observability frameworks side by side. Each framework operates independently with no interference.
- **PerfLog to perf.log**: PerfLog writes JSON-formatted event logs to a local file. Grafana can ingest these via Loki or a file-based datasource.
- **Beast Insight to StatsD Server**: Insight sends aggregated metrics (counters, gauges) over UDP to a StatsD server. Grafana reads from StatsD-compatible backends like Graphite or Prometheus (via StatsD exporter).
- **OpenTelemetry to OTLP Collector**: OTel exports spans over OTLP/gRPC to a Collector, which then forwards to a trace backend (Tempo).
- **Grafana (red, unified UI)**: All three data streams converge in Grafana, enabling operators to correlate logs, metrics, and traces in a single dashboard.
### 2.6.5 Correlation with PerfLog
Trace IDs can be correlated with existing PerfLog entries for comprehensive debugging:
```cpp
// In RPCHandler.cpp - correlate trace with PerfLog
Status doCommand(RPC::JsonContext& context, Json::Value& result)
{
// Start OpenTelemetry span
auto span = context.app.getTelemetry().startSpan(
"rpc.command." + context.method);
// Get trace ID for correlation
auto traceId = span->GetContext().trace_id().IsValid()
? toHex(span->GetContext().trace_id())
: "";
// Use existing PerfLog with trace correlation
auto const curId = context.app.getPerfLog().currentId();
context.app.getPerfLog().rpcStart(context.method, curId);
// Future: Add trace ID to PerfLog entry
// context.app.getPerfLog().setTraceId(curId, traceId);
try {
auto ret = handler(context, result);
context.app.getPerfLog().rpcFinish(context.method, curId);
span->SetStatus(opentelemetry::trace::StatusCode::kOk);
return ret;
} catch (std::exception const& e) {
context.app.getPerfLog().rpcError(context.method, curId);
span->RecordException(e);
span->SetStatus(opentelemetry::trace::StatusCode::kError, e.what());
throw;
}
}
```
---
_Previous: [Architecture Analysis](./01-architecture-analysis.md)_ | _Next: [Implementation Strategy](./03-implementation-strategy.md)_ | _Back to: [Overview](./OpenTelemetryPlan.md)_

View File

@@ -1,530 +0,0 @@
# Implementation Strategy
> **Parent Document**: [OpenTelemetryPlan.md](./OpenTelemetryPlan.md)
> **Related**: [Code Samples](./04-code-samples.md) | [Configuration Reference](./05-configuration-reference.md)
---
## 3.1 Directory Structure
The telemetry implementation follows xrpld's existing code organization pattern:
```
include/xrpl/
├── telemetry/
│ ├── Telemetry.h # Main telemetry interface (global singleton)
│ ├── TelemetryConfig.h # Configuration structures
│ ├── TraceContext.h # Context propagation utilities
│ ├── SpanGuard.h # RAII span management with factory methods + discard()
│ ├── DiscardFlag.h # Thread-local discard flag
│ └── SpanAttributes.h # Attribute helper functions
src/libxrpl/
├── telemetry/
│ ├── Telemetry.cpp # Implementation + FilteringSpanProcessor
│ ├── TelemetryConfig.cpp # Config parsing
│ ├── TraceContext.cpp # Context serialization
│ └── NullTelemetry.cpp # No-op implementation
```
---
## 3.2 Implementation Approach
<div align="center">
```mermaid
%%{init: {'flowchart': {'nodeSpacing': 20, 'rankSpacing': 30}}}%%
flowchart TB
subgraph phase1["Phase 1: Core"]
direction LR
sdk["SDK Integration"] ~~~ interface["Telemetry Interface"] ~~~ config["Configuration"]
end
subgraph phase2["Phase 2: RPC"]
direction LR
http["HTTP Context"] ~~~ rpc["RPC Handlers"]
end
subgraph phase3["Phase 3: P2P"]
direction LR
proto["Protobuf Context"] ~~~ tx["Transaction Relay"]
end
subgraph phase4["Phase 4: Consensus"]
direction LR
consensus["Consensus Rounds"] ~~~ proposals["Proposals"]
end
phase1 --> phase2 --> phase3 --> phase4
style phase1 fill:#1565c0,stroke:#0d47a1,color:#ffffff
style phase2 fill:#2e7d32,stroke:#1b5e20,color:#ffffff
style phase3 fill:#e65100,stroke:#bf360c,color:#ffffff
style phase4 fill:#c2185b,stroke:#880e4f,color:#ffffff
```
</div>
### Key Principles
1. **Minimal Intrusion**: Instrumentation should not alter existing control flow
2. **Zero-Cost When Disabled**: Use compile-time flags and no-op implementations
3. **Backward Compatibility**: Protocol Buffer extensions use high field numbers
4. **Graceful Degradation**: Tracing failures must not affect node operation
---
## 3.3 Performance Overhead Summary
> **OTLP** = OpenTelemetry Protocol
| Metric | Overhead | Notes |
| ------------- | ---------- | ------------------------------------------------ |
| CPU | 1-3% | Of per-transaction CPU cost (~200μs baseline) |
| Memory | ~10 MB | SDK statics + batch buffer + worker thread stack |
| Network | 10-50 KB/s | Compressed OTLP export to collector |
| Latency (p99) | <2% | With proper sampling configuration |
---
## 3.4 Detailed CPU Overhead Analysis
### 3.4.1 Per-Operation Costs
> **Note on hardware assumptions**: The costs below are based on the official OTel C++ SDK CI benchmarks
> (969 runs on GitHub Actions 2-core shared runners). On production server hardware (3+ GHz Xeon),
> expect costs at the **lower end** of each range (~30-50% improvement over CI hardware).
| Operation | Time (ns) | Frequency | Impact |
| --------------------- | --------- | ---------------------- | ---------- |
| Span creation | 500-1000 | Every traced operation | Low |
| Span end | 100-200 | Every traced operation | Low |
| SetAttribute (string) | 80-120 | 3-5 per span | Low |
| SetAttribute (int) | 40-60 | 2-3 per span | Negligible |
| AddEvent | 100-200 | 0-2 per span | Low |
| Context injection | 150-250 | Per outgoing message | Low |
| Context extraction | 100-180 | Per incoming message | Low |
| GetCurrent context | 10-20 | Thread-local access | Negligible |
**Source**: Span creation based on OTel C++ SDK `BM_SpanCreation` benchmark (AlwaysOnSampler +
SimpleSpanProcessor + InMemoryExporter), median ~1,000 ns on CI hardware. AddEvent includes
timestamp read + string copy + vector push + mutex acquisition. Context injection/extraction
confirmed by `BM_SpanCreationWithScope` benchmark delta (~160 ns).
### 3.4.2 Transaction Processing Overhead
<div align="center">
```mermaid
%%{init: {'pie': {'textPosition': 0.75}}}%%
pie showData
"tx.receive (1400ns)" : 1400
"tx.validate (1200ns)" : 1200
"tx.relay (1200ns)" : 1200
"Context inject (200ns)" : 200
```
**Transaction Tracing Overhead (~4.0μs total)**
</div>
**Overhead percentage**: 4.0 μs / 200 μs (avg tx processing) = **~2.0%**
> **Breakdown**: Each span (tx.receive, tx.validate, tx.relay) costs ~1,000 ns for creation plus
> ~200-400 ns for 3-5 attribute sets. Context injection is ~200 ns (confirmed by benchmarks).
> On production hardware, expect ~2.6 μs total (~1.3% overhead) due to faster span creation (~500-600 ns).
### 3.4.3 Consensus Round Overhead
| Operation | Count | Cost (ns) | Total |
| ---------------------- | ----- | --------- | ---------- |
| consensus.round span | 1 | ~1200 | ~1.2 μs |
| consensus.phase spans | 3 | ~1100 | ~3.3 μs |
| proposal.receive spans | ~20 | ~1100 | ~22 μs |
| proposal.send spans | ~3 | ~1100 | ~3.3 μs |
| Context operations | ~30 | ~200 | ~6 μs |
| **TOTAL** | | | **~36 μs** |
> **Why higher**: Each span costs ~1,000 ns creation + ~100-200 ns for 1-2 attributes, totaling ~1,100-1,200 ns.
> Context operations remain ~200 ns (confirmed by benchmarks). On production hardware, expect ~24 μs total.
**Overhead percentage**: 36 μs / 3s (typical round) = **~0.001%** (negligible)
### 3.4.4 RPC Request Overhead
| Operation | Cost (ns) |
| ---------------- | ------------ |
| rpc.request span | ~1200 |
| rpc.command span | ~1100 |
| Context extract | ~250 |
| Context inject | ~200 |
| **TOTAL** | **~2.75 μs** |
> **Why higher**: Each span costs ~1,000 ns creation + ~100-200 ns for attributes (command name,
> version, role). Context extract/inject costs are confirmed by OTel C++ benchmarks.
- Fast RPC (1ms): 2.75 μs / 1ms = **~0.275%**
- Slow RPC (100ms): 2.75 μs / 100ms = **~0.003%**
---
## 3.5 Memory Overhead Analysis
> **OTLP** = OpenTelemetry Protocol
### 3.5.1 Static Memory
| Component | Size | Allocated |
| ------------------------------------ | ----------- | ---------- |
| TracerProvider singleton | ~64 KB | At startup |
| BatchSpanProcessor (circular buffer) | ~16 KB | At startup |
| BatchSpanProcessor (worker thread) | ~8 MB | At startup |
| OTLP exporter (gRPC channel init) | ~256 KB | At startup |
| Propagator registry | ~8 KB | At startup |
| **Total static** | **~8.3 MB** | |
> **Why higher than earlier estimate**: The BatchSpanProcessor's circular buffer itself is only ~16 KB
> (2049 x 8-byte `AtomicUniquePtr` entries), but it spawns a dedicated worker thread whose default
> stack size on Linux is ~8 MB. The OTLP gRPC exporter allocates memory for channel stubs and TLS
> initialization. The worker thread stack dominates the static footprint.
### 3.5.2 Dynamic Memory
| Component | Size per unit | Max units | Peak |
| -------------------- | -------------- | ---------- | --------------- |
| Active span | ~500-800 bytes | 1000 | ~500-800 KB |
| Queued span (export) | ~500 bytes | 2048 | ~1 MB |
| Attribute storage | ~80 bytes | 5 per span | Included |
| Context storage | ~64 bytes | Per thread | ~6.4 KB |
| **Total dynamic** | | | **~1.5-1.8 MB** |
> **Why active spans are larger**: An active `Span` object includes the wrapper (~88 bytes: shared_ptr,
> mutex, unique_ptr to Recordable) plus `SpanData` (~250 bytes: SpanContext, timestamps, name, status,
> empty containers) plus attribute storage (~200-500 bytes for 3-5 string attributes in a `std::map`).
> Source: `sdk/src/trace/span.h` and `sdk/include/opentelemetry/sdk/trace/span_data.h`.
> Queued spans release the wrapper, keeping only `SpanData` + attributes (~500 bytes).
### 3.5.3 Memory Growth Characteristics
```mermaid
---
config:
xyChart:
width: 700
height: 400
---
xychart-beta
title "Memory Usage vs Span Rate (bounded by queue limit)"
x-axis "Spans/second" [0, 200, 400, 600, 800, 1000]
y-axis "Memory (MB)" 0 --> 12
line [8.5, 9.2, 9.6, 9.9, 10.0, 10.0]
```
**Notes**:
- Memory increases with span rate but **plateaus at queue capacity** (default 2048 spans)
- Batch export prevents unbounded growth
- At queue limit, oldest spans are dropped (not blocked)
- Maximum memory is bounded: ~8.3 MB static (dominated by worker thread stack) + 2048 queued spans x ~500 bytes (~1 MB) + active spans (~0.8 MB) ≈ **~10 MB ceiling**
- The worker thread stack (~8 MB) is virtual memory; actual RSS depends on stack usage (typically much less)
### 3.5.4 Performance Data Sources
The overhead estimates in Sections 3.3-3.5 are derived from the following sources:
| Source | What it covers | URL |
| ------------------------------------------------ | ----------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
| OTel C++ SDK CI benchmarks (969 runs) | Span creation, context activation, sampler overhead | [Benchmark Dashboard](https://open-telemetry.github.io/opentelemetry-cpp/benchmarks/) |
| `api/test/trace/span_benchmark.cc` | API-level span creation (~22 ns no-op) | [Source](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-cpp/blob/main/api/test/trace/span_benchmark.cc) |
| `sdk/test/trace/sampler_benchmark.cc` | SDK span creation with samplers (~1,000 ns AlwaysOn) | [Source](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-cpp/blob/main/sdk/test/trace/sampler_benchmark.cc) |
| `sdk/include/.../span_data.h` | SpanData memory layout (~250 bytes base) | [Source](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-cpp/blob/main/sdk/include/opentelemetry/sdk/trace/span_data.h) |
| `sdk/src/trace/span.h` | Span wrapper memory layout (~88 bytes) | [Source](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-cpp/blob/main/sdk/src/trace/span.h) |
| `sdk/include/.../batch_span_processor_options.h` | Default queue size (2048), batch size (512) | [Source](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-cpp/blob/main/sdk/include/opentelemetry/sdk/trace/batch_span_processor_options.h) |
| `sdk/include/.../circular_buffer.h` | CircularBuffer implementation (AtomicUniquePtr array) | [Source](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-cpp/blob/main/sdk/include/opentelemetry/sdk/common/circular_buffer.h) |
| OTLP proto definition | Serialized span size estimation | [Proto](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-proto/blob/main/opentelemetry/proto/trace/v1/trace.proto) |
---
## 3.6 Network Overhead Analysis
### 3.6.1 Export Bandwidth
> **Bytes per span**: Estimates use ~500 bytes/span (conservative upper bound). OTLP protobuf analysis
> shows a typical span with 3-5 string attributes serializes to ~200-300 bytes raw; with gzip
> compression (~60-70% of raw) and batching (amortized headers), ~350 bytes/span is more realistic.
> The table uses the conservative estimate for capacity planning.
| Sampling Rate | Spans/sec | Bandwidth | Notes |
| ------------- | --------- | --------- | ---------------- |
| 100% | ~500 | ~250 KB/s | Development only |
| 10% | ~50 | ~25 KB/s | Staging |
| 1% | ~5 | ~2.5 KB/s | Production |
| Error-only | ~1 | ~0.5 KB/s | Minimal overhead |
### 3.6.2 Trace Context Propagation
| Message Type | Context Size | Messages/sec | Overhead |
| ---------------------- | ------------ | ------------ | ----------- |
| TMTransaction | 25 bytes | ~100 | ~2.5 KB/s |
| TMProposeSet | 25 bytes | ~10 | ~250 B/s |
| TMValidation | 25 bytes | ~50 | ~1.25 KB/s |
| **Total P2P overhead** | | | **~4 KB/s** |
---
## 3.7 Optimization Strategies
### 3.7.1 Sampling Strategies
#### Tail Sampling
```mermaid
flowchart TD
trace["New Trace"]
trace --> errors{"Is Error?"}
errors -->|Yes| sample["SAMPLE"]
errors -->|No| consensus{"Is Consensus?"}
consensus -->|Yes| sample
consensus -->|No| slow{"Is Slow?"}
slow -->|Yes| sample
slow -->|No| prob{"Random < 10%?"}
prob -->|Yes| sample
prob -->|No| drop["DROP"]
style sample fill:#4caf50,stroke:#388e3c,color:#fff
style drop fill:#f44336,stroke:#c62828,color:#fff
```
### 3.7.2 Batch Tuning Recommendations
| Environment | Batch Size | Batch Delay | Max Queue |
| ------------------ | ---------- | ----------- | --------- |
| Low-latency | 128 | 1000ms | 512 |
| High-throughput | 1024 | 10000ms | 8192 |
| Memory-constrained | 256 | 2000ms | 512 |
### 3.7.3 Conditional Instrumentation
SpanGuard's static factory methods handle both compile-time and runtime
checks internally. When `XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY` is not defined, the
entire SpanGuard class compiles to a no-op stub with empty method bodies.
When it is defined, the factory methods check the global Telemetry
instance and the relevant component filter before creating a span:
```cpp
// SpanGuard factory methods handle all conditional logic internally.
// When XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY is not defined, these are no-ops.
// When defined, they check Telemetry::getInstance() and the
// component filter (e.g. shouldTracePeer()) at runtime.
auto span = telemetry::SpanGuard::peerSpan("peer.message.receive");
span.setAttribute("xrpl.peer.id", peerId);
// No overhead when telemetry is disabled at compile time or runtime
```
---
## 3.8 Links to Detailed Documentation
- **[Code Samples](./04-code-samples.md)**: Complete implementation code for all components
- **[Configuration Reference](./05-configuration-reference.md)**: Configuration options and collector setup
- **[Implementation Phases](./06-implementation-phases.md)**: Detailed timeline and milestones
---
## 3.9 Code Intrusiveness Assessment
> **TxQ** = Transaction Queue
This section provides a detailed assessment of how intrusive the OpenTelemetry integration is to the existing xrpld codebase.
### 3.9.1 Files Modified Summary
| Component | Files Modified | Lines Added | Lines Changed | Architectural Impact |
| --------------------- | -------------- | ----------- | ------------- | -------------------- |
| **Core Telemetry** | 7 new files | ~800 | 0 | None (new module) |
| **Application Init** | 2 files | ~30 | ~5 | Minimal |
| **RPC Layer** | 3 files | ~80 | ~20 | Minimal |
| **Transaction Relay** | 4 files | ~120 | ~40 | Low |
| **Consensus** | 3 files | ~100 | ~30 | Low-Medium |
| **Protocol Buffers** | 1 file | ~25 | 0 | Low |
| **CMake/Build** | 3 files | ~50 | ~10 | Minimal |
| **PathFinding** | 2 | ~80 | ~5 | Minimal |
| **TxQ/Fee** | 2 | ~60 | ~5 | Minimal |
| **Validator/Amend** | 3 | ~40 | ~5 | Minimal |
| **Total** | **~27 files** | **~1,490** | **~120** | **Low** |
### 3.9.2 Detailed File Impact
```mermaid
pie title Code Changes by Component
"New Telemetry Module" : 800
"Transaction Relay" : 160
"Consensus" : 130
"RPC Layer" : 100
"PathFinding" : 80
"TxQ/Fee" : 60
"Validator/Amendment" : 40
"Application Init" : 35
"Protocol Buffers" : 25
"Build System" : 60
```
#### New Files (No Impact on Existing Code)
| File | Lines | Purpose |
| ------------------------------------------- | ----- | ----------------------------------------------------- |
| `include/xrpl/telemetry/Telemetry.h` | ~160 | Main interface (global singleton) |
| `include/xrpl/telemetry/SpanGuard.h` | ~250 | RAII wrapper + factory methods + discard + no-op stub |
| `include/xrpl/telemetry/DiscardFlag.h` | ~28 | Thread-local discard flag |
| `include/xrpl/telemetry/TraceContext.h` | ~80 | Context propagation |
| `src/libxrpl/telemetry/Telemetry.cpp` | ~400 | Implementation + FilteringSpanProcessor |
| `src/libxrpl/telemetry/TelemetryConfig.cpp` | ~60 | Config parsing |
| `src/libxrpl/telemetry/NullTelemetry.cpp` | ~40 | No-op implementation |
#### Modified Files (Existing Xrpld Code)
| File | Lines Added | Lines Changed | Risk Level |
| ------------------------------------------------- | ----------- | ------------- | ---------- |
| `src/xrpld/app/main/Application.cpp` | ~15 | ~3 | Low |
| `include/xrpl/core/ServiceRegistry.h` | ~5 | ~2 | Low |
| `src/xrpld/rpc/detail/ServerHandler.cpp` | ~40 | ~10 | Low |
| `src/xrpld/rpc/handlers/*.cpp` | ~30 | ~8 | Low |
| `src/xrpld/overlay/detail/PeerImp.cpp` | ~60 | ~15 | Medium |
| `src/xrpld/overlay/detail/OverlayImpl.cpp` | ~30 | ~10 | Medium |
| `src/xrpld/app/consensus/RCLConsensus.cpp` | ~50 | ~15 | Medium |
| `src/xrpld/app/consensus/RCLConsensusAdaptor.cpp` | ~40 | ~12 | Medium |
| `src/xrpld/core/JobQueue.cpp` | ~20 | ~5 | Low |
| `src/xrpld/app/paths/PathRequest.cpp` | ~40 | ~3 | Low |
| `src/xrpld/app/paths/Pathfinder.cpp` | ~40 | ~2 | Low |
| `src/xrpld/app/misc/TxQ.cpp` | ~40 | ~3 | Low |
| `src/xrpld/app/main/LoadManager.cpp` | ~20 | ~2 | Low |
| `src/xrpld/app/misc/ValidatorList.cpp` | ~20 | ~2 | Low |
| `src/xrpld/app/misc/AmendmentTable.cpp` | ~10 | ~2 | Low |
| `src/xrpld/app/misc/Manifest.cpp` | ~10 | ~1 | Low |
| `src/xrpld/shamap/SHAMap.cpp` | ~20 | ~3 | Low |
| `src/xrpld/overlay/detail/ripple.proto` | ~25 | 0 | Low |
| `CMakeLists.txt` | ~40 | ~8 | Low |
| `cmake/FindOpenTelemetry.cmake` | ~50 | 0 | None (new) |
### 3.9.3 Risk Assessment by Component
<div align="center">
**Do First** ↖ ↗ **Plan Carefully**
```mermaid
quadrantChart
title Code Intrusiveness Risk Matrix
x-axis Low Risk --> High Risk
y-axis Low Value --> High Value
RPC Tracing: [0.2, 0.55]
Transaction Relay: [0.55, 0.85]
Consensus Tracing: [0.75, 0.92]
Peer Message Tracing: [0.85, 0.35]
JobQueue Context: [0.3, 0.42]
Ledger Acquisition: [0.48, 0.65]
PathFinding: [0.38, 0.72]
TxQ and Fees: [0.25, 0.62]
Validator Mgmt: [0.15, 0.35]
```
**Optional** ↙ ↘ **Avoid**
</div>
#### Risk Level Definitions
| Risk Level | Definition | Mitigation |
| ---------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------- |
| **Low** | Additive changes only; no modification to existing logic | Standard code review |
| **Medium** | Minor modifications to existing functions; clear boundaries | Comprehensive unit tests |
| **High** | Changes to core logic or data structures; potential side effects | Integration tests + staged rollout |
### 3.9.4 Architectural Impact Assessment
| Aspect | Impact | Justification |
| -------------------- | ------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| **Data Flow** | Minimal | Read-only instrumentation; no modification to consensus or transaction data flow |
| **Threading Model** | Minimal | Context propagation uses thread-local storage (standard OTel pattern) |
| **Memory Model** | Low | Bounded queues prevent unbounded growth; RAII ensures cleanup |
| **Network Protocol** | Low | Optional fields in protobuf (high field numbers); backward compatible |
| **Configuration** | None | New config section; existing configs unaffected |
| **Build System** | Low | Optional CMake flag; builds work without OpenTelemetry |
| **Dependencies** | Low | OpenTelemetry SDK is optional; null implementation when disabled |
### 3.9.5 Backward Compatibility
| Compatibility | Status | Notes |
| --------------- | ------- | ----------------------------------------------------- |
| **Config File** | ✅ Full | New `[telemetry]` section is optional |
| **Protocol** | ✅ Full | Optional protobuf fields with high field numbers |
| **Build** | ✅ Full | `XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY=OFF` produces identical binary |
| **Runtime** | ✅ Full | `enabled=0` produces zero overhead |
| **API** | ✅ Full | No changes to public RPC or P2P APIs |
### 3.9.6 Rollback Strategy
If issues are discovered after deployment:
1. **Immediate**: Set `enabled=0` in config and restart (zero code change)
2. **Quick**: Rebuild with `XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY=OFF`
3. **Complete**: Revert telemetry commits (clean separation makes this easy)
### 3.9.7 Code Change Examples
**Minimal RPC Instrumentation (Low Intrusiveness):**
```cpp
// Before
void ServerHandler::onRequest(...) {
auto result = processRequest(req);
send(result);
}
// After (only ~4 lines added)
void ServerHandler::onRequest(...) {
auto span = telemetry::SpanGuard::rpcSpan("rpc.request"); // +1 line
span.setAttribute("command", command); // +1 line
auto result = processRequest(req);
span.setAttribute("rpc_status", status); // +1 line
send(result);
}
```
SpanGuard factory methods (`rpcSpan`, `txSpan`, `consensusSpan`, etc.)
access the global `Telemetry` instance internally and check the relevant
component filter (`shouldTraceRpc()`, etc.) before creating a span. The
public SpanGuard header has zero `opentelemetry/` includes -- all OTel
types are hidden behind the pimpl idiom.
**Consensus Instrumentation (Medium Intrusiveness):**
```cpp
// Before
void RCLConsensusAdaptor::startRound(...) {
// ... existing logic
}
// After (context storage required)
void RCLConsensusAdaptor::startRound(...) {
auto span = telemetry::SpanGuard::consensusSpan("consensus.round");
span.setAttribute("xrpl.consensus.ledger.seq", seq);
// Store context for child spans in phase transitions
currentRoundContext_ = span.context(); // New member variable
// ... existing logic unchanged
}
```
---
_Previous: [Design Decisions](./02-design-decisions.md)_ | _Next: [Code Samples](./04-code-samples.md)_ | _Back to: [Overview](./OpenTelemetryPlan.md)_

File diff suppressed because it is too large Load Diff

View File

@@ -1,984 +0,0 @@
# Configuration Reference
> **Parent Document**: [OpenTelemetryPlan.md](./OpenTelemetryPlan.md)
> **Related**: [Code Samples](./04-code-samples.md) | [Implementation Phases](./06-implementation-phases.md)
---
## 5.1 xrpld Configuration
> **OTLP** = OpenTelemetry Protocol | **TxQ** = Transaction Queue
### 5.1.1 Configuration File Section
Add to `cfg/xrpld-example.cfg`:
```ini
# ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
# TELEMETRY (OpenTelemetry Distributed Tracing)
# ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
#
# Enables distributed tracing for transaction flow, consensus, and RPC calls.
# Traces are exported to an OpenTelemetry Collector using OTLP protocol.
#
# [telemetry]
#
# # Enable/disable telemetry (default: 0 = disabled)
# enabled=1
#
# # OTLP endpoint (default: http://localhost:4318/v1/traces - OTLP/HTTP)
# # Note: only OTLP/HTTP is shipped in Phase 1b. OTLP/gRPC support is
# # planned as future work and is not yet parsed by TelemetryConfig.cpp.
# endpoint=http://localhost:4318/v1/traces
#
# # Use TLS for exporter connection (default: 0)
# use_tls=0
#
# # Path to CA certificate for TLS (optional)
# # tls_ca_cert=/path/to/ca.crt
#
# # Sampling ratio: 0.0-1.0 (default: 1.0 = 100% sampling)
# # Use lower values in production to reduce overhead
# # Default: 1.0 (all traces). For production deployments with high
# # throughput, 0.1 (10%) is recommended to reduce overhead.
# # See Section 7.4.2 for sampling strategy details.
# sampling_ratio=0.1
#
# # Batch processor settings
# batch_size=512 # Spans per batch (default: 512)
# batch_delay_ms=5000 # Max delay before sending batch (default: 5000)
# max_queue_size=2048 # Max queued spans (default: 2048)
#
# # Component-specific tracing (default: all enabled except peer)
# trace_transactions=1 # Transaction relay and processing
# trace_consensus=1 # Consensus rounds and proposals
# trace_rpc=1 # RPC request handling
# trace_peer=0 # Peer messages (high volume, disabled by default)
# trace_ledger=1 # Ledger acquisition and building
#
# # Planned (not yet parsed by TelemetryConfig.cpp):
# # trace_pathfind=1 # Path computation (Phase 2)
# # trace_txq=1 # Transaction queue (Phase 3)
# # trace_validator=0 # Validator list / manifest (future)
# # trace_amendment=0 # Amendment voting (future)
#
# # Trace ID strategies for cross-node correlation
# # "deterministic" (default) derives trace_id from a workflow hash
# # (txHash for transactions, prevLedgerHash for consensus) so all nodes
# # produce spans under the same trace_id for the same workflow.
# # "attribute" uses random trace_id; correlation via attribute queries.
# tx_trace_strategy=deterministic
# consensus_trace_strategy=deterministic
#
# # Service identification (automatically detected if not specified)
# # service_name=xrpld
# # service_instance_id=<node_public_key>
[telemetry]
enabled=0
```
### 5.1.2 Configuration Options Summary
| Option | Type | Default | Description |
| -------------------------- | ------ | --------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| `enabled` | bool | `false` | Enable/disable telemetry |
| `endpoint` | string | `http://localhost:4318/v1/traces` | OTLP/HTTP collector endpoint |
| `use_tls` | bool | `false` | Enable TLS for exporter connection |
| `tls_ca_cert` | string | `""` | Path to CA certificate file |
| `sampling_ratio` | float | `1.0` | Sampling ratio (0.0-1.0) |
| `batch_size` | uint | `512` | Spans per export batch |
| `batch_delay_ms` | uint | `5000` | Max delay before sending batch (ms) |
| `max_queue_size` | uint | `2048` | Maximum queued spans |
| `trace_transactions` | bool | `true` | Enable transaction tracing |
| `trace_consensus` | bool | `true` | Enable consensus tracing |
| `trace_rpc` | bool | `true` | Enable RPC tracing |
| `trace_peer` | bool | `false` | Enable peer message tracing (high volume) |
| `trace_ledger` | bool | `true` | Enable ledger tracing |
| `tx_trace_strategy` | string | `"deterministic"` | TX trace ID strategy: `"deterministic"` (trace_id = txHash[0:16]) or `"attribute"` (random) |
| `consensus_trace_strategy` | string | `"deterministic"` | Consensus trace ID strategy: `"deterministic"` (trace_id = prevLedgerHash[0:16]) or `"attribute"` (random) |
| `service_name` | string | `"xrpld"` | Service name for traces |
| `service_instance_id` | string | `<node_pubkey>` | Instance identifier |
**Planned (not yet implemented)**: the following options appear in the design
documents but are not parsed by `TelemetryConfig.cpp` in Phase 1b and later
phases. They will be added as the corresponding subsystems are instrumented:
| Option | Planned Phase | Purpose |
| ----------------- | ------------- | ---------------------------------------- |
| `exporter` | Future | Select between OTLP/HTTP and OTLP/gRPC |
| `trace_pathfind` | Phase 2 | Path computation tracing toggle |
| `trace_txq` | Phase 3 | Transaction queue tracing toggle |
| `trace_validator` | Future | Validator list / manifest update tracing |
| `trace_amendment` | Future | Amendment voting tracing |
---
## 5.2 Configuration Parser
> **TxQ** = Transaction Queue
```cpp
// src/libxrpl/telemetry/TelemetryConfig.cpp
#include <xrpl/telemetry/Telemetry.h>
#include <xrpl/basics/Log.h>
namespace xrpl {
namespace telemetry {
Telemetry::Setup
setupTelemetry(
Section const& section,
std::string const& nodePublicKey,
std::string const& version)
{
Telemetry::Setup setup;
// Basic settings
setup.enabled = section.value_or("enabled", false);
setup.serviceName = section.value_or("service_name", "xrpld");
setup.serviceVersion = version;
setup.serviceInstanceId = section.value_or(
"service_instance_id", nodePublicKey);
// Exporter settings
setup.exporterType = section.value_or("exporter", "otlp_grpc");
if (setup.exporterType == "otlp_grpc")
setup.exporterEndpoint = section.value_or("endpoint", "localhost:4317");
else if (setup.exporterType == "otlp_http")
setup.exporterEndpoint = section.value_or("endpoint", "localhost:4318");
setup.useTls = section.value_or("use_tls", false);
setup.tlsCertPath = section.value_or("tls_ca_cert", "");
// Sampling
setup.samplingRatio = section.value_or("sampling_ratio", 1.0);
if (setup.samplingRatio < 0.0 || setup.samplingRatio > 1.0)
{
Throw<std::runtime_error>(
"telemetry.sampling_ratio must be between 0.0 and 1.0");
}
// Batch processor
setup.batchSize = section.value_or("batch_size", 512u);
setup.batchDelay = std::chrono::milliseconds{
section.value_or("batch_delay_ms", 5000u)};
setup.maxQueueSize = section.value_or("max_queue_size", 2048u);
// Component filtering
setup.traceTransactions = section.value_or("trace_transactions", true);
setup.traceConsensus = section.value_or("trace_consensus", true);
setup.traceRpc = section.value_or("trace_rpc", true);
setup.tracePeer = section.value_or("trace_peer", false);
setup.traceLedger = section.value_or("trace_ledger", true);
setup.tracePathfind = section.value_or("trace_pathfind", true);
setup.traceTxQ = section.value_or("trace_txq", true);
setup.traceValidator = section.value_or("trace_validator", false);
setup.traceAmendment = section.value_or("trace_amendment", false);
return setup;
}
} // namespace telemetry
} // namespace xrpl
```
---
## 5.3 Application Integration
### 5.3.1 ApplicationImp Changes
> **Deferred identity**: The node public key (`nodeIdentity_`) is not
> available during `ApplicationImp`'s member initializer list — it is
> resolved later in `setup()`. The `Telemetry` object is therefore
> constructed with an empty `serviceInstanceId` and patched via
> `setServiceInstanceId()` once `setup()` has called `getNodeIdentity()`.
```cpp
// src/xrpld/app/main/Application.cpp (modified)
#include <xrpl/telemetry/Telemetry.h>
class ApplicationImp : public Application, public BasicApp
{
// ... existing members (perfLog_, etc.) ...
// Telemetry — constructed in the member initializer list with
// an empty serviceInstanceId, patched in setup().
std::unique_ptr<telemetry::Telemetry> telemetry_;
// Member initializer list (excerpt):
// ...
// , telemetry_(
// telemetry::makeTelemetry(
// telemetry::setupTelemetry(
// config_->section("telemetry"),
// "", // Updated later via setServiceInstanceId()
// BuildInfo::getVersionString()),
// logs_->journal("Telemetry")))
// ...
bool setup(...) override
{
// ... existing setup code ...
nodeIdentity_ = getNodeIdentity(*this, cmdline);
// Inject node identity into telemetry resource attributes,
// unless the user already set a custom service_instance_id.
if (!config_->section("telemetry").exists("service_instance_id"))
telemetry_->setServiceInstanceId(
toBase58(TokenType::NodePublic, nodeIdentity_->first));
// ... rest of setup ...
}
void start(bool withTimers) override
{
// ... existing start code ...
telemetry_->start();
}
void run() override
{
// ... existing run/shutdown code ...
telemetry_->stop();
}
telemetry::Telemetry&
getTelemetry() override
{
return *telemetry_;
}
};
```
### 5.3.2 ServiceRegistry Interface Addition
```cpp
// include/xrpl/core/ServiceRegistry.h (modified)
namespace telemetry {
class Telemetry;
} // namespace telemetry
class ServiceRegistry
{
public:
// ... existing virtual methods ...
/** Get the telemetry system for distributed tracing. */
virtual telemetry::Telemetry&
getTelemetry() = 0;
};
```
> **Note:** `Application` extends `ServiceRegistry`, so `getTelemetry()` is
> available on both. Components that hold a `ServiceRegistry&` (e.g.
> `NetworkOPsImp`) call `registry_.get().getTelemetry()`. Components that
> still hold an `Application&` (e.g. `ServerHandler`, `PeerImp`,
> `RCLConsensusAdaptor`) call `app_.getTelemetry()` directly.
---
## 5.4 CMake Integration
> **OTLP** = OpenTelemetry Protocol
### 5.4.1 Find OpenTelemetry Module
```cmake
# cmake/FindOpenTelemetry.cmake
# Find OpenTelemetry C++ SDK
#
# This module defines:
# OpenTelemetry_FOUND - System has OpenTelemetry
# OpenTelemetry::api - API library target
# OpenTelemetry::sdk - SDK library target
# OpenTelemetry::otlp_grpc_exporter - OTLP gRPC exporter target
# OpenTelemetry::otlp_http_exporter - OTLP HTTP exporter target
find_package(opentelemetry-cpp CONFIG QUIET)
if(opentelemetry-cpp_FOUND)
set(OpenTelemetry_FOUND TRUE)
# Create imported targets if not already created by config
if(NOT TARGET OpenTelemetry::api)
add_library(OpenTelemetry::api ALIAS opentelemetry-cpp::api)
endif()
if(NOT TARGET OpenTelemetry::sdk)
add_library(OpenTelemetry::sdk ALIAS opentelemetry-cpp::sdk)
endif()
if(NOT TARGET OpenTelemetry::otlp_grpc_exporter)
add_library(OpenTelemetry::otlp_grpc_exporter ALIAS
opentelemetry-cpp::otlp_grpc_exporter)
endif()
else()
# Try pkg-config fallback
find_package(PkgConfig QUIET)
if(PKG_CONFIG_FOUND)
pkg_check_modules(OTEL opentelemetry-cpp QUIET)
if(OTEL_FOUND)
set(OpenTelemetry_FOUND TRUE)
# Create imported targets from pkg-config
add_library(OpenTelemetry::api INTERFACE IMPORTED)
target_include_directories(OpenTelemetry::api INTERFACE
${OTEL_INCLUDE_DIRS})
endif()
endif()
endif()
include(FindPackageHandleStandardArgs)
find_package_handle_standard_args(OpenTelemetry
REQUIRED_VARS OpenTelemetry_FOUND)
```
### 5.4.2 CMakeLists.txt Changes
```cmake
# CMakeLists.txt (additions)
# ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
# TELEMETRY OPTIONS
# ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
option(XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY
"Enable OpenTelemetry distributed tracing support" OFF)
if(XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY)
find_package(OpenTelemetry REQUIRED)
# Define compile-time flag
add_compile_definitions(XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY)
message(STATUS "OpenTelemetry tracing: ENABLED")
else()
message(STATUS "OpenTelemetry tracing: DISABLED")
endif()
# ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
# TELEMETRY LIBRARY
# ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
if(XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY)
add_library(xrpl_telemetry
src/libxrpl/telemetry/Telemetry.cpp
src/libxrpl/telemetry/TelemetryConfig.cpp
src/libxrpl/telemetry/TraceContext.cpp
)
target_include_directories(xrpl_telemetry
PUBLIC
${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/include
)
target_link_libraries(xrpl_telemetry
PUBLIC
OpenTelemetry::api
OpenTelemetry::sdk
OpenTelemetry::otlp_grpc_exporter
PRIVATE
xrpl_basics
)
# Add to main library dependencies
target_link_libraries(xrpld PRIVATE xrpl_telemetry)
else()
# Create null implementation library
add_library(xrpl_telemetry
src/libxrpl/telemetry/NullTelemetry.cpp
)
target_include_directories(xrpl_telemetry
PUBLIC ${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/include
)
endif()
```
---
## 5.5 OpenTelemetry Collector Configuration
> **OTLP** = OpenTelemetry Protocol | **APM** = Application Performance Monitoring
> **Production hardening**: The configurations in this section are starting points. For production deployments where xrpld ships telemetry across a network to a centrally-hosted collector, see [Securing the OTel Pipeline](./secure-OTel.md) for the required mTLS receiver config, NetworkPolicy, and peer trace-context validation.
### 5.5.1 Development Configuration
```yaml
# otel-collector-dev.yaml
# Minimal configuration for local development
receivers:
otlp:
protocols:
grpc:
endpoint: 0.0.0.0:4317
http:
endpoint: 0.0.0.0:4318
processors:
batch:
timeout: 1s
send_batch_size: 100
exporters:
# Console output for debugging
logging:
verbosity: detailed
sampling_initial: 5
sampling_thereafter: 200
# Tempo for trace storage
otlp/tempo:
endpoint: tempo:4317
tls:
insecure: true
service:
pipelines:
traces:
receivers: [otlp]
processors: [batch]
exporters: [logging, otlp/tempo]
```
### 5.5.2 Production Configuration
```yaml
# otel-collector-prod.yaml
# Production configuration with filtering, sampling, and multiple backends
receivers:
otlp:
protocols:
grpc:
endpoint: 0.0.0.0:4317
tls:
cert_file: /etc/otel/server.crt
key_file: /etc/otel/server.key
ca_file: /etc/otel/ca.crt
processors:
# Memory limiter to prevent OOM
memory_limiter:
check_interval: 1s
limit_mib: 1000
spike_limit_mib: 200
# Batch processing for efficiency
batch:
timeout: 5s
send_batch_size: 512
send_batch_max_size: 1024
# Tail-based sampling (keep errors and slow traces)
tail_sampling:
decision_wait: 10s
num_traces: 100000
expected_new_traces_per_sec: 1000
policies:
# Always keep error traces
- name: errors
type: status_code
status_code:
status_codes: [ERROR]
# Keep slow consensus rounds (>5s)
- name: slow-consensus
type: latency
latency:
threshold_ms: 5000
# Keep slow RPC requests (>1s)
- name: slow-rpc
type: and
and:
and_sub_policy:
- name: rpc-spans
type: string_attribute
string_attribute:
key: command
values: [".*"]
enabled_regex_matching: true
- name: latency
type: latency
latency:
threshold_ms: 1000
# Probabilistic sampling for the rest
- name: probabilistic
type: probabilistic
probabilistic:
sampling_percentage: 10
# Attribute processing
attributes:
actions:
# Hash sensitive data
- key: xrpl.tx.account
action: hash
# Add deployment info
- key: deployment.environment
value: production
action: upsert
exporters:
# Grafana Tempo for long-term storage
otlp/tempo:
endpoint: tempo.monitoring:4317
tls:
insecure: false
ca_file: /etc/otel/tempo-ca.crt
# Elastic APM for correlation with logs
otlp/elastic:
endpoint: apm.elastic:8200
headers:
Authorization: "Bearer ${ELASTIC_APM_TOKEN}"
extensions:
health_check:
endpoint: 0.0.0.0:13133
zpages:
endpoint: 0.0.0.0:55679
service:
extensions: [health_check, zpages]
pipelines:
traces:
receivers: [otlp]
processors: [memory_limiter, tail_sampling, attributes, batch]
exporters: [otlp/tempo, otlp/elastic]
```
---
## 5.6 Docker Compose Development Environment
> **OTLP** = OpenTelemetry Protocol
```yaml
# docker-compose-telemetry.yaml
version: "3.8"
services:
# OpenTelemetry Collector
otel-collector:
image: otel/opentelemetry-collector-contrib:0.92.0
container_name: otel-collector
command: ["--config=/etc/otel-collector-config.yaml"]
volumes:
- ./otel-collector-dev.yaml:/etc/otel-collector-config.yaml:ro
ports:
- "4317:4317" # OTLP gRPC
- "4318:4318" # OTLP HTTP
- "13133:13133" # Health check
depends_on:
- tempo
# Tempo for trace storage
tempo:
image: grafana/tempo:2.6.1
container_name: tempo
ports:
- "3200:3200" # Tempo HTTP API
- "4317" # OTLP gRPC (internal)
# Grafana for dashboards
grafana:
image: grafana/grafana:10.2.3
container_name: grafana
environment:
- GF_AUTH_ANONYMOUS_ENABLED=true
- GF_AUTH_ANONYMOUS_ORG_ROLE=Admin
volumes:
- ./grafana/provisioning:/etc/grafana/provisioning:ro
- ./grafana/dashboards:/var/lib/grafana/dashboards:ro
ports:
- "3000:3000"
depends_on:
- tempo
# Prometheus for metrics (optional, for correlation)
prometheus:
image: prom/prometheus:v2.48.1
container_name: prometheus
volumes:
- ./prometheus.yaml:/etc/prometheus/prometheus.yml:ro
ports:
- "9090:9090"
networks:
default:
name: xrpld-telemetry
```
---
## 5.7 Configuration Architecture
> **OTLP** = OpenTelemetry Protocol
```mermaid
flowchart TB
subgraph config["Configuration Sources"]
cfgFile["xrpld.cfg<br/>[telemetry] section"]
cmake["CMake<br/>XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY"]
end
subgraph init["Initialization"]
parse["setupTelemetry()"]
factory["makeTelemetry()"]
end
subgraph runtime["Runtime Components"]
tracer["TracerProvider"]
exporter["OTLP Exporter"]
processor["BatchProcessor"]
end
subgraph collector["Collector Pipeline"]
recv["Receivers"]
proc["Processors"]
exp["Exporters"]
end
cfgFile --> parse
cmake -->|"compile flag"| parse
parse --> factory
factory --> tracer
tracer --> processor
processor --> exporter
exporter -->|"OTLP"| recv
recv --> proc
proc --> exp
style config fill:#e3f2fd,stroke:#1976d2
style runtime fill:#e8f5e9,stroke:#388e3c
style collector fill:#fff3e0,stroke:#ff9800
```
**Reading the diagram:**
- **Configuration Sources**: `xrpld.cfg` provides runtime settings (endpoint, sampling) while the CMake flag controls whether telemetry is compiled in at all.
- **Initialization**: `setupTelemetry()` parses config values, then `makeTelemetry()` constructs the provider, processor, and exporter objects.
- **Runtime Components**: The `TracerProvider` creates spans, the `BatchProcessor` buffers them, and the `OTLP Exporter` serializes and sends them over the wire.
- **OTLP arrow to Collector**: Trace data leaves the xrpld process via OTLP (gRPC or HTTP) and enters the external Collector pipeline.
- **Collector Pipeline**: `Receivers` ingest OTLP data, `Processors` apply sampling/filtering/enrichment, and `Exporters` forward traces to storage backends (Tempo, etc.).
---
## 5.8 Grafana Integration
> **APM** = Application Performance Monitoring
Step-by-step instructions for integrating xrpld traces with Grafana.
### 5.8.1 Data Source Configuration
#### Tempo (Recommended)
```yaml
# grafana/provisioning/datasources/tempo.yaml
apiVersion: 1
datasources:
- name: Tempo
type: tempo
access: proxy
url: http://tempo:3200
jsonData:
httpMethod: GET
tracesToLogs:
datasourceUid: loki
tags: ["service.name", "xrpl.tx.hash"]
mappedTags: [{ key: "trace_id", value: "traceID" }]
mapTagNamesEnabled: true
filterByTraceID: true
serviceMap:
datasourceUid: prometheus
nodeGraph:
enabled: true
search:
hide: false
lokiSearch:
datasourceUid: loki
```
#### Elastic APM
```yaml
# grafana/provisioning/datasources/elastic-apm.yaml
apiVersion: 1
datasources:
- name: Elasticsearch-APM
type: elasticsearch
access: proxy
url: http://elasticsearch:9200
database: "apm-*"
jsonData:
esVersion: "8.0.0"
timeField: "@timestamp"
logMessageField: message
logLevelField: log.level
```
### 5.8.2 Dashboard Provisioning
```yaml
# grafana/provisioning/dashboards/dashboards.yaml
apiVersion: 1
providers:
- name: "xrpld-dashboards"
orgId: 1
folder: "xrpld"
folderUid: "xrpld"
type: file
disableDeletion: false
updateIntervalSeconds: 30
options:
path: /var/lib/grafana/dashboards/rippled
```
### 5.8.3 Example Dashboard: RPC Performance
```json
{
"title": "xrpld RPC Performance",
"uid": "xrpld-rpc-performance",
"panels": [
{
"title": "RPC Latency by Command",
"type": "heatmap",
"datasource": "Tempo",
"targets": [
{
"queryType": "traceql",
"query": "{resource.service.name=\"xrpld\" && span.command != \"\"} | histogram_over_time(duration) by (span.command)"
}
],
"gridPos": { "h": 8, "w": 12, "x": 0, "y": 0 }
},
{
"title": "RPC Error Rate",
"type": "timeseries",
"datasource": "Tempo",
"targets": [
{
"queryType": "traceql",
"query": "{resource.service.name=\"xrpld\" && status.code=error} | rate() by (span.command)"
}
],
"gridPos": { "h": 8, "w": 12, "x": 12, "y": 0 }
},
{
"title": "Top 10 Slowest RPC Commands",
"type": "table",
"datasource": "Tempo",
"targets": [
{
"queryType": "traceql",
"query": "{resource.service.name=\"xrpld\" && span.command != \"\"} | avg(duration) by (span.command) | topk(10)"
}
],
"gridPos": { "h": 8, "w": 24, "x": 0, "y": 8 }
},
{
"title": "Recent Traces",
"type": "table",
"datasource": "Tempo",
"targets": [
{
"queryType": "traceql",
"query": "{resource.service.name=\"xrpld\"}"
}
],
"gridPos": { "h": 8, "w": 24, "x": 0, "y": 16 }
}
]
}
```
### 5.8.4 Example Dashboard: Transaction Tracing
```json
{
"title": "xrpld Transaction Tracing",
"uid": "xrpld-tx-tracing",
"panels": [
{
"title": "Transaction Throughput",
"type": "stat",
"datasource": "Tempo",
"targets": [
{
"queryType": "traceql",
"query": "{resource.service.name=\"xrpld\" && name=\"tx.receive\"} | rate()"
}
],
"gridPos": { "h": 4, "w": 6, "x": 0, "y": 0 }
},
{
"title": "Cross-Node Relay Count",
"type": "timeseries",
"datasource": "Tempo",
"targets": [
{
"queryType": "traceql",
"query": "{resource.service.name=\"xrpld\" && name=\"tx.relay\"} | avg(span.xrpl.tx.relay_count)"
}
],
"gridPos": { "h": 8, "w": 12, "x": 0, "y": 4 }
},
{
"title": "Transaction Validation Errors",
"type": "table",
"datasource": "Tempo",
"targets": [
{
"queryType": "traceql",
"query": "{resource.service.name=\"xrpld\" && name=\"tx.validate\" && status.code=error}"
}
],
"gridPos": { "h": 8, "w": 12, "x": 12, "y": 4 }
}
]
}
```
### 5.8.5 TraceQL Query Examples
Common queries for xrpld traces:
```
# Find all traces for a specific transaction hash
{resource.service.name="xrpld" && span.xrpl.tx.hash="ABC123..."}
# Find slow RPC commands (>100ms)
{resource.service.name="xrpld" && name=~"rpc.command.*"} | duration > 100ms
# Find consensus rounds taking >5 seconds
{resource.service.name="xrpld" && name="consensus.round"} | duration > 5s
# Find failed transactions with error details
{resource.service.name="xrpld" && name="tx.validate" && status.code=error}
# Find transactions relayed to many peers
{resource.service.name="xrpld" && name="tx.relay"} | span.xrpl.tx.relay_count > 10
# Compare latency across nodes
{resource.service.name="xrpld" && name="rpc.command.account_info"} | avg(duration) by (resource.service.instance.id)
```
### 5.8.6 Correlation with PerfLog
To correlate OpenTelemetry traces with existing PerfLog data:
**Step 1: Configure Loki to ingest PerfLog**
```yaml
# promtail-config.yaml
scrape_configs:
- job_name: xrpld-perflog
static_configs:
- targets:
- localhost
labels:
job: xrpld
__path__: /var/log/rippled/perf*.log
pipeline_stages:
- json:
expressions:
trace_id: trace_id
ledger_seq: ledger_seq
tx_hash: tx_hash
- labels:
trace_id:
ledger_seq:
tx_hash:
```
**Step 2: Add trace_id to PerfLog entries**
Modify PerfLog to include trace_id when available:
```cpp
// In PerfLog output, add trace_id from current span context
void logPerf(Json::Value& entry) {
auto span = opentelemetry::trace::GetSpan(
opentelemetry::context::RuntimeContext::GetCurrent());
if (span && span->GetContext().IsValid()) {
char traceIdHex[33];
span->GetContext().trace_id().ToLowerBase16(traceIdHex);
entry["trace_id"] = std::string(traceIdHex, 32);
}
// ... existing logging
}
```
**Step 3: Configure Grafana trace-to-logs link**
In Tempo data source configuration, set up the derived field:
```yaml
jsonData:
tracesToLogs:
datasourceUid: loki
tags: ["trace_id", "xrpl.tx.hash"]
filterByTraceID: true
filterBySpanID: false
```
### 5.8.7 Correlation with Insight/StatsD Metrics
To correlate traces with existing Beast Insight metrics:
**Step 1: Export Insight metrics to Prometheus**
```yaml
# prometheus.yaml
scrape_configs:
- job_name: "xrpld-statsd"
static_configs:
- targets: ["statsd-exporter:9102"]
```
**Step 2: Add exemplars to metrics**
OpenTelemetry SDK automatically adds exemplars (trace IDs) to metrics when using the Prometheus exporter. This links metrics spikes to specific traces.
**Step 3: Configure Grafana metric-to-trace link**
```yaml
# In Prometheus data source
jsonData:
exemplarTraceIdDestinations:
- name: trace_id
datasourceUid: tempo
```
**Step 4: Dashboard panel with exemplars**
```json
{
"title": "RPC Latency with Trace Links",
"type": "timeseries",
"datasource": "Prometheus",
"targets": [
{
"expr": "histogram_quantile(0.99, rate(xrpld_rpc_duration_seconds_bucket[5m]))",
"exemplar": true
}
]
}
```
This allows clicking on metric data points to jump directly to the related trace.
---
_Previous: [Code Samples](./04-code-samples.md)_ | _Next: [Implementation Phases](./06-implementation-phases.md)_ | _Back to: [Overview](./OpenTelemetryPlan.md)_

View File

@@ -1,590 +0,0 @@
# Implementation Phases
> **Parent Document**: [OpenTelemetryPlan.md](./OpenTelemetryPlan.md)
> **Related**: [Configuration Reference](./05-configuration-reference.md) | [Observability Backends](./07-observability-backends.md)
---
## 6.1 Phase Overview
> **TxQ** = Transaction Queue
```mermaid
gantt
title OpenTelemetry Implementation Timeline
dateFormat YYYY-MM-DD
axisFormat Week %W
section Phase 1
Core Infrastructure :p1, 2024-01-01, 2w
SDK Integration :p1a, 2024-01-01, 4d
Telemetry Interface :p1b, after p1a, 3d
Configuration & CMake :p1c, after p1b, 3d
Unit Tests :p1d, after p1c, 2d
Buffer & Integration :p1e, after p1d, 2d
section Phase 2
RPC Tracing :p2, after p1, 2w
HTTP Context Extraction :p2a, after p1, 2d
RPC Handler Instrumentation :p2b, after p2a, 4d
PathFinding Instrumentation :p2f, after p2b, 2d
TxQ Instrumentation :p2g, after p2f, 2d
WebSocket Support :p2c, after p2g, 2d
Integration Tests :p2d, after p2c, 2d
Buffer & Review :p2e, after p2d, 4d
section Phase 3
Transaction Tracing :p3, after p2, 2w
Protocol Buffer Extension :p3a, after p2, 2d
PeerImp Instrumentation :p3b, after p3a, 3d
Fee Escalation Instrumentation :p3f, after p3b, 2d
Relay Context Propagation :p3c, after p3f, 3d
Multi-node Tests :p3d, after p3c, 2d
Buffer & Review :p3e, after p3d, 4d
section Phase 4
Consensus Tracing :p4, after p3, 2w
Consensus Round Spans :p4a, after p3, 3d
Proposal Handling :p4b, after p4a, 3d
Validator List & Manifest Tracing :p4f, after p4b, 2d
Amendment Voting Tracing :p4g, after p4f, 2d
SHAMap Sync Tracing :p4h, after p4g, 2d
Validation Tests :p4c, after p4h, 4d
Buffer & Review :p4e, after p4c, 4d
section Phase 5
Documentation & Deploy :p5, after p4, 1w
```
---
## 6.2 Phase 1: Core Infrastructure (Weeks 1-2)
**Objective**: Establish foundational telemetry infrastructure
### Tasks
| Task | Description |
| ---- | ----------------------------------------------------- |
| 1.1 | Add OpenTelemetry C++ SDK to Conan/CMake |
| 1.2 | Implement `Telemetry` interface and factory |
| 1.3 | Implement `SpanGuard` RAII wrapper |
| 1.4 | Implement configuration parser |
| 1.5 | Integrate into `ApplicationImp` |
| 1.6 | Add conditional compilation (`XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY`) |
| 1.7 | Create `NullTelemetry` no-op implementation |
| 1.8 | Unit tests for core infrastructure |
### Exit Criteria
- [ ] OpenTelemetry SDK compiles and links
- [ ] Telemetry can be enabled/disabled via config
- [ ] Basic span creation works
- [ ] No performance regression when disabled
- [ ] Unit tests passing
---
## 6.3 Phase 2: RPC Tracing (Weeks 3-4)
> **TxQ** = Transaction Queue
**Objective**: Complete tracing for all RPC operations
### Tasks
| Task | Description |
| ---- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 2.1 | Implement W3C Trace Context HTTP header extraction |
| 2.2 | Instrument `ServerHandler::onRequest()` |
| 2.3 | Instrument `RPCHandler::doCommand()` |
| 2.4 | Add RPC-specific attributes |
| 2.5 | Instrument WebSocket handler |
| 2.6 | PathFinding instrumentation (`pathfind.request`, `pathfind.compute` spans) |
| 2.7 | TxQ instrumentation (`txq.enqueue`, `txq.apply` spans) |
| 2.8 | Integration tests for RPC tracing |
| 2.9 | Performance benchmarks |
| 2.10 | Documentation |
### Exit Criteria
- [ ] All RPC commands traced
- [ ] Trace context propagates from HTTP headers
- [ ] WebSocket and HTTP both instrumented
- [ ] <1ms overhead per RPC call
- [ ] Integration tests passing
---
## 6.4 Phase 3: Transaction Tracing (Weeks 5-6)
**Objective**: Trace transaction lifecycle across network with deterministic cross-node correlation
### Tasks
| Task | Description |
| ---- | -------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 3.1 | Define `TraceContext` Protocol Buffer message |
| 3.2 | Implement protobuf context serialization |
| 3.3 | Instrument `PeerImp::handleTransaction()` |
| 3.4 | Instrument `NetworkOPs::submitTransaction()` |
| 3.5 | Instrument HashRouter integration |
| 3.6 | Fee escalation instrumentation (`fee.escalate` span) |
| 3.7 | Implement relay context propagation |
| 3.8 | Integration tests (multi-node) |
| 3.9 | Deterministic transaction trace ID (`trace_id = txHash[0:16]`) |
| 3.10 | Performance benchmarks |
### Deterministic Trace ID (Task 3.9)
Transaction spans use **deterministic trace IDs** derived from the transaction hash:
`trace_id = txHash[0:16]`. All nodes handling the same transaction independently
produce spans under the same trace_id. Protobuf `span_id` propagation (Task 3.7)
additionally provides parent-child relay ordering when available. See
[02-design-decisions.md §2.5.0](./02-design-decisions.md) for the design rationale
and [Phase3_taskList.md Task 3.9](./Phase3_taskList.md) for the full implementation spec.
### Exit Criteria
- [ ] Transaction traces span across nodes
- [ ] Trace context in Protocol Buffer messages
- [ ] HashRouter deduplication visible in traces
- [ ] Multi-node integration tests passing
- [ ] <5% overhead on transaction throughput
- [ ] Deterministic trace_id: all nodes produce same trace_id for same transaction
- [ ] Protobuf span_id propagation preserves parent-child ordering when available
---
## 6.5 Phase 4: Consensus Tracing (Weeks 7-8)
**Objective**: Full observability into consensus rounds
### Tasks
| Task | Description |
| ---- | ---------------------------------------------- |
| 4.1 | Instrument `RCLConsensusAdaptor::startRound()` |
| 4.2 | Instrument phase transitions |
| 4.3 | Instrument proposal handling |
| 4.4 | Instrument validation handling |
| 4.5 | Add consensus-specific attributes |
| 4.6 | Correlate with transaction traces |
| 4.7 | Validator list and manifest tracing |
| 4.8 | Amendment voting tracing |
| 4.9 | SHAMap sync tracing |
| 4.10 | Multi-validator integration tests |
| 4.11 | Performance validation |
### Exit Criteria
- [ ] Complete consensus round traces
- [ ] Phase transitions visible
- [ ] Proposals and validations traced
- [ ] No impact on consensus timing
- [ ] Multi-validator test network validated
### Implementation Status — Phase 4a Plan
Phase 4a (establish-phase gap fill & cross-node correlation) will add:
- **Deterministic trace ID** derived from `previousLedger.id()` so all validators
in the same round share the same `trace_id` (switchable via
`consensus_trace_strategy` config: `"deterministic"` or `"attribute"`).
See [Configuration Reference](./05-configuration-reference.md) for full
configuration options.
- **Round lifecycle spans**: `consensus.round` with round-to-round span links.
- **Establish phase**: `consensus.establish`, `consensus.update_positions` (with
`dispute.resolve` events), `consensus.check` (with threshold tracking).
- **Mode changes**: `consensus.mode_change` spans.
- **Validation**: `consensus.validation.send` with span link to round span
(thread-safe cross-thread access via `roundSpanContext_` snapshot).
- **Separation of concerns**: telemetry extracted to private helpers
(`startRoundTracing`, `createValidationSpan`, `startEstablishTracing`,
`updateEstablishTracing`, `endEstablishTracing`).
The `Phase4_taskList.md` spec document is introduced in the Phase 2 PR (#6424)
and will contain the full task breakdown and implementation notes.
---
## 6.6 Phase 5: Documentation & Deployment (Week 9)
**Objective**: Production readiness
### Tasks
| Task | Description |
| ---- | ----------------------------- |
| 5.1 | Operator runbook |
| 5.2 | Grafana dashboards |
| 5.3 | Alert definitions |
| 5.4 | Collector deployment examples |
| 5.5 | Developer documentation |
| 5.6 | Training materials |
| 5.7 | Final integration testing |
---
## 6.7 Risk Assessment
```mermaid
quadrantChart
title Risk Assessment Matrix
x-axis Low Impact --> High Impact
y-axis Low Likelihood --> High Likelihood
quadrant-1 Mitigate Immediately
quadrant-2 Plan Mitigation
quadrant-3 Accept Risk
quadrant-4 Monitor Closely
SDK Compat: [0.2, 0.18]
Protocol Chg: [0.75, 0.72]
Perf Overhead: [0.58, 0.42]
Context Prop: [0.4, 0.55]
Memory Leaks: [0.85, 0.25]
```
### Risk Details
| Risk | Likelihood | Impact | Mitigation |
| ------------------------------------ | ---------- | ------ | --------------------------------------- |
| Protocol changes break compatibility | Medium | High | Use high field numbers, optional fields |
| Performance overhead unacceptable | Medium | Medium | Sampling, conditional compilation |
| Context propagation complexity | Medium | Medium | Phased rollout, extensive testing |
| SDK compatibility issues | Low | Medium | Pin SDK version, fallback to no-op |
| Memory leaks in long-running nodes | Low | High | Memory profiling, bounded queues |
---
## 6.8 Success Metrics
| Metric | Target | Measurement |
| ------------------------ | -------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------- |
| Trace coverage | >95% of transaction code paths (independent of sampling ratio) | Sampling verification |
| CPU overhead | <3% | Benchmark tests |
| Memory overhead | <10 MB | Memory profiling |
| Latency impact (p99) | <2% | Performance tests |
| Trace completeness | >99% spans with required attrs | Validation script |
| Cross-node trace linkage | >90% of multi-hop transactions | Integration tests |
---
## 6.9 Quick Wins and Crawl-Walk-Run Strategy
> **TxQ** = Transaction Queue
This section outlines a prioritized approach to maximize ROI with minimal initial investment.
### 6.9.1 Crawl-Walk-Run Overview
<div align="center">
```mermaid
flowchart TB
subgraph crawl["🐢 CRAWL (Week 1-2)"]
direction LR
c1[Core SDK Setup] ~~~ c2[RPC Tracing Only] ~~~ c3[PathFinding + TxQ Tracing] ~~~ c4[Single Node]
end
subgraph walk["🚶 WALK (Week 3-5)"]
direction LR
w1[Transaction Tracing] ~~~ w2[Fee Escalation Tracing] ~~~ w3[Cross-Node Context] ~~~ w4[Basic Dashboards]
end
subgraph run["🏃 RUN (Week 6-9)"]
direction LR
r1[Consensus Tracing] ~~~ r2[Validator, Amendment,<br/>SHAMap Tracing] ~~~ r3[Full Correlation] ~~~ r4[Production Deploy]
end
crawl --> walk --> run
style crawl fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#fff
style walk fill:#bf360c,stroke:#8c2809,color:#fff
style run fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#fff
style c1 fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#fff
style c2 fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#fff
style c3 fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#fff
style c4 fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#fff
style w1 fill:#ffe0b2,stroke:#ffcc80,color:#1e293b
style w2 fill:#ffe0b2,stroke:#ffcc80,color:#1e293b
style w3 fill:#ffe0b2,stroke:#ffcc80,color:#1e293b
style w4 fill:#ffe0b2,stroke:#ffcc80,color:#1e293b
style r1 fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#fff
style r2 fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#fff
style r3 fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#fff
style r4 fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#fff
```
</div>
**Reading the diagram:**
- **CRAWL (Weeks 1-2)**: Minimal investment -- set up the SDK, instrument RPC and PathFinding/TxQ handlers, and verify on a single node. Delivers immediate latency visibility.
- **WALK (Weeks 3-5)**: Expand to transaction lifecycle tracing, fee escalation, cross-node context propagation, and basic Grafana dashboards. This is where distributed tracing starts working.
- **RUN (Weeks 6-9)**: Full consensus instrumentation, validator/amendment/SHAMap tracing, end-to-end correlation, and production deployment with sampling and alerting.
- **Arrows (crawl → walk → run)**: Each phase builds on the prior one; you cannot skip ahead because later phases depend on infrastructure established earlier.
### 6.9.2 Quick Wins (Immediate Value)
| Quick Win | Value | When to Deploy |
| ------------------------------ | ------ | -------------- |
| **RPC Command Tracing** | High | Week 2 |
| **RPC Latency Histograms** | High | Week 2 |
| **Error Rate Dashboard** | Medium | Week 2 |
| **Transaction Submit Tracing** | High | Week 3 |
| **Consensus Round Duration** | Medium | Week 6 |
### 6.9.3 CRAWL Phase (Weeks 1-2)
**Goal**: Get basic tracing working with minimal code changes.
**What You Get**:
- RPC request/response traces for all commands
- Latency breakdown per RPC command
- PathFinding and TxQ tracing (directly impacts RPC latency)
- Error visibility with stack traces
- Basic Grafana dashboard
**Code Changes**: ~15 lines in `ServerHandler.cpp`, ~40 lines in new telemetry module
**Why Start Here**:
- RPC is the lowest-risk, highest-visibility component
- PathFinding and TxQ are RPC-adjacent and directly affect latency
- Immediate value for debugging client issues
- No cross-node complexity
- Single file modification to existing code
### 6.9.4 WALK Phase (Weeks 3-5)
**Goal**: Add transaction lifecycle tracing across nodes.
**What You Get**:
- End-to-end transaction traces from submit to relay
- Fee escalation tracing within the transaction pipeline
- Cross-node correlation (see transaction path)
- HashRouter deduplication visibility
- Relay latency metrics
**Code Changes**: ~120 lines across 4 files, plus protobuf extension
**Why Do This Second**:
- Builds on RPC tracing (transactions submitted via RPC)
- Fee escalation is integral to the transaction processing pipeline
- Moderate complexity (requires context propagation)
- High value for debugging transaction issues
### 6.9.5 RUN Phase (Weeks 6-9)
**Goal**: Full observability including consensus.
**What You Get**:
- Complete consensus round visibility
- Phase transition timing
- Validator proposal tracking
- Validator list and manifest tracing
- Amendment voting tracing
- SHAMap sync tracing
- Full end-to-end traces (client → RPC → TX → consensus → ledger)
**Code Changes**: ~100 lines across 3 consensus files, plus validator/amendment/SHAMap modules
**Why Do This Last**:
- Highest complexity (consensus is critical path)
- Validator, amendment, and SHAMap components are lower priority
- Requires thorough testing
- Lower relative value (consensus issues are rarer)
### 6.9.6 ROI Prioritization Matrix
```mermaid
quadrantChart
title Implementation ROI Matrix
x-axis Low Effort --> High Effort
y-axis Low Value --> High Value
quadrant-1 Quick Wins - Do First
quadrant-2 Major Projects - Plan Carefully
quadrant-3 Nice to Have - Optional
quadrant-4 Time Sinks - Avoid
RPC Tracing: [0.15, 0.92]
TX Submit Trace: [0.3, 0.78]
TX Relay Trace: [0.5, 0.88]
Consensus Trace: [0.72, 0.72]
Peer Msg Trace: [0.85, 0.3]
Ledger Acquire: [0.55, 0.52]
```
---
## 6.10 Definition of Done
> **TxQ** = Transaction Queue | **HA** = High Availability
Clear, measurable criteria for each phase.
### 6.10.1 Phase 1: Core Infrastructure
| Criterion | Measurement | Target |
| --------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------- |
| SDK Integration | `cmake --build` succeeds with `-DXRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY=ON` | ✅ Compiles |
| Runtime Toggle | `enabled=0` produces zero overhead | <0.1% CPU difference |
| Span Creation | Unit test creates and exports span | Span appears in Tempo |
| Configuration | All config options parsed correctly | Config validation tests pass |
| Documentation | Developer guide exists | PR approved |
**Definition of Done**: All criteria met, PR merged, no regressions in CI.
### 6.10.2 Phase 2: RPC Tracing
| Criterion | Measurement | Target |
| ------------------ | ---------------------------------- | -------------------------- |
| Coverage | All RPC commands instrumented | 100% of commands |
| Context Extraction | traceparent header propagates | Integration test passes |
| Attributes | Command, status, duration recorded | Validation script confirms |
| Performance | RPC latency overhead | <1ms p99 |
| Dashboard | Grafana dashboard deployed | Screenshot in docs |
**Definition of Done**: RPC traces visible in Tempo for all commands, dashboard shows latency distribution.
### 6.10.3 Phase 3: Transaction Tracing
| Criterion | Measurement | Target |
| --------------------- | ------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------- |
| Local Trace | Submit validate TxQ traced | Single-node test passes |
| Cross-Node | Context propagates via protobuf | Multi-node test passes |
| Deterministic TraceID | Same trace_id on all nodes for same tx | Multi-node test: query by txHash[0:16] returns all spans |
| Relay Ordering | Protobuf span_id propagation creates parent-child | Tempo trace tree shows relay chain |
| Graceful Degradation | Old peer drops trace_context | Spans still grouped by deterministic trace_id |
| Relay Visibility | relay_count attribute correct | Spot check 100 txs |
| HashRouter | Deduplication visible in trace | Duplicate txs show suppressed=true |
| Performance | TX throughput overhead | <5% degradation |
**Definition of Done**: Transaction traces span 3+ nodes in test network with deterministic trace_id correlation, parent-child ordering via protobuf propagation, and performance within bounds.
### 6.10.4 Phase 4: Consensus Tracing
| Criterion | Measurement | Target |
| -------------------- | ----------------------------- | ------------------------- |
| Round Tracing | startRound creates root span | Unit test passes |
| Phase Visibility | All phases have child spans | Integration test confirms |
| Proposer Attribution | Proposer ID in attributes | Spot check 50 rounds |
| Timing Accuracy | Phase durations match PerfLog | <5% variance |
| No Consensus Impact | Round timing unchanged | Performance test passes |
**Definition of Done**: Consensus rounds fully traceable, no impact on consensus timing.
### 6.10.5 Phase 5: Production Deployment
| Criterion | Measurement | Target |
| ------------ | ---------------------------- | -------------------------- |
| Collector HA | Multiple collectors deployed | No single point of failure |
| Sampling | Tail sampling configured | 10% base + errors + slow |
| Retention | Data retained per policy | 7 days hot, 30 days warm |
| Alerting | Alerts configured | Error spike, high latency |
| Runbook | Operator documentation | Approved by ops team |
| Training | Team trained | Session completed |
**Definition of Done**: Telemetry running in production, operators trained, alerts active.
### 6.10.6 Success Metrics Summary
| Phase | Primary Metric | Secondary Metric | Deadline |
| ------- | ---------------------- | --------------------------- | ------------- |
| Phase 1 | SDK compiles and runs | Zero overhead when disabled | End of Week 2 |
| Phase 2 | 100% RPC coverage | <1ms latency overhead | End of Week 4 |
| Phase 3 | Cross-node traces work | <5% throughput impact | End of Week 6 |
| Phase 4 | Consensus fully traced | No consensus timing impact | End of Week 8 |
| Phase 5 | Production deployment | Operators trained | End of Week 9 |
---
## 6.11 Recommended Implementation Order
Based on ROI analysis, implement in this exact order:
```mermaid
flowchart TB
subgraph week1["Week 1"]
t1[1. OpenTelemetry SDK<br/>Conan/CMake integration]
t2[2. Telemetry interface<br/>SpanGuard, config]
end
subgraph week2["Week 2"]
t3[3. RPC ServerHandler<br/>instrumentation]
t4[4. Basic Tempo setup<br/>for testing]
end
subgraph week3["Week 3"]
t5[5. Transaction submit<br/>tracing]
t6[6. Grafana dashboard<br/>v1]
end
subgraph week4["Week 4"]
t7[7. Protobuf context<br/>extension]
t8[8. PeerImp tx.relay<br/>instrumentation]
end
subgraph week5["Week 5"]
t9[9. Multi-node<br/>integration tests]
t10[10. Performance<br/>benchmarks]
end
subgraph week6_8["Weeks 6-8"]
t11[11. Consensus<br/>instrumentation]
t12[12. Full integration<br/>testing]
end
subgraph week9["Week 9"]
t13[13. Production<br/>deployment]
t14[14. Documentation<br/>& training]
end
t1 --> t2 --> t3 --> t4
t4 --> t5 --> t6
t6 --> t7 --> t8
t8 --> t9 --> t10
t10 --> t11 --> t12
t12 --> t13 --> t14
style week1 fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#fff
style week2 fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#fff
style week3 fill:#bf360c,stroke:#8c2809,color:#fff
style week4 fill:#bf360c,stroke:#8c2809,color:#fff
style week5 fill:#bf360c,stroke:#8c2809,color:#fff
style week6_8 fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#fff
style week9 fill:#4a148c,stroke:#2e0d57,color:#fff
style t1 fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#fff
style t2 fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#fff
style t3 fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#fff
style t4 fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#fff
style t5 fill:#ffe0b2,stroke:#ffcc80,color:#1e293b
style t6 fill:#ffe0b2,stroke:#ffcc80,color:#1e293b
style t7 fill:#ffe0b2,stroke:#ffcc80,color:#1e293b
style t8 fill:#ffe0b2,stroke:#ffcc80,color:#1e293b
style t9 fill:#ffe0b2,stroke:#ffcc80,color:#1e293b
style t10 fill:#ffe0b2,stroke:#ffcc80,color:#1e293b
style t11 fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#fff
style t12 fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#fff
style t13 fill:#4a148c,stroke:#2e0d57,color:#fff
style t14 fill:#4a148c,stroke:#2e0d57,color:#fff
```
**Reading the diagram:**
- **Week 1 (tasks 1-2)**: Foundation work -- integrate the OpenTelemetry SDK via Conan/CMake and build the `Telemetry` interface with `SpanGuard` and config parsing.
- **Week 2 (tasks 3-4)**: First observable output -- instrument `ServerHandler` for RPC tracing and stand up Tempo so developers can see traces immediately.
- **Weeks 3-5 (tasks 5-10)**: Transaction lifecycle -- add submit tracing, build the first Grafana dashboard, extend protobuf for cross-node context, instrument `PeerImp` relay, then validate with multi-node integration tests and performance benchmarks.
- **Weeks 6-8 (tasks 11-12)**: Consensus deep-dive -- instrument consensus rounds and phases, then run full integration testing across all instrumented paths.
- **Week 9 (tasks 13-14)**: Go-live -- deploy to production with sampling/alerting configured, and deliver documentation and operator training.
- **Arrow chain (t1 ... t14)**: Strict sequential dependency; each task's output is a prerequisite for the next.
---
_Previous: [Configuration Reference](./05-configuration-reference.md)_ | _Next: [Observability Backends](./07-observability-backends.md)_ | _Back to: [Overview](./OpenTelemetryPlan.md)_

View File

@@ -1,641 +0,0 @@
# Observability Backend Recommendations
> **Parent Document**: [OpenTelemetryPlan.md](./OpenTelemetryPlan.md)
> **Related**: [Implementation Phases](./06-implementation-phases.md) | [Appendix](./08-appendix.md)
---
## 7.1 Development/Testing Backends
> **OTLP** = OpenTelemetry Protocol
| Backend | Pros | Cons | Use Case |
| ---------- | ----------------------------------- | ---------------------- | ------------------- |
| **Tempo** | Cost-effective, Grafana integration | Requires Grafana stack | Local dev, CI, Prod |
| **Zipkin** | Simple, lightweight | Basic features | Quick prototyping |
### Quick Start with Tempo
```bash
# Start Tempo with OTLP support
docker run -d --name tempo \
-p 3200:3200 \
-p 4317:4317 \
-p 4318:4318 \
grafana/tempo:2.6.1
```
---
## 7.2 Production Backends
> **APM** = Application Performance Monitoring
| Backend | Pros | Cons | Use Case |
| ----------------- | ----------------------------------------- | ---------------------- | --------------------------- |
| **Grafana Tempo** | Cost-effective, Grafana integration | Requires Grafana stack | Most production deployments |
| **Elastic APM** | Full observability stack, log correlation | Resource intensive | Existing Elastic users |
| **Honeycomb** | Excellent query, high cardinality | SaaS cost | Deep debugging needs |
| **Datadog APM** | Full platform, easy setup | SaaS cost | Enterprise with budget |
### Backend Selection Flowchart
```mermaid
flowchart TD
start[Select Backend] --> budget{Budget<br/>Constraints?}
budget -->|Yes| oss[Open Source]
budget -->|No| saas{Prefer<br/>SaaS?}
oss --> existing{Existing<br/>Stack?}
existing -->|Grafana| tempo[Grafana Tempo]
existing -->|Elastic| elastic[Elastic APM]
existing -->|None| tempo
saas -->|Yes| enterprise{Enterprise<br/>Support?}
saas -->|No| oss
enterprise -->|Yes| datadog[Datadog APM]
enterprise -->|No| honeycomb[Honeycomb]
tempo --> final[Configure Collector]
elastic --> final
honeycomb --> final
datadog --> final
style start fill:#0f172a,stroke:#020617,color:#fff
style budget fill:#334155,stroke:#1e293b,color:#fff
style oss fill:#1e293b,stroke:#0f172a,color:#fff
style existing fill:#334155,stroke:#1e293b,color:#fff
style saas fill:#334155,stroke:#1e293b,color:#fff
style enterprise fill:#334155,stroke:#1e293b,color:#fff
style final fill:#0f172a,stroke:#020617,color:#fff
style tempo fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#fff
style elastic fill:#bf360c,stroke:#8c2809,color:#fff
style honeycomb fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#fff
style datadog fill:#4a148c,stroke:#2e0d57,color:#fff
```
**Reading the diagram:**
- **Budget Constraints? (Yes)**: Leads to open-source options. If you already run Grafana or Elastic, pick the matching backend; otherwise default to Grafana Tempo.
- **Budget Constraints? (No) → Prefer SaaS?**: If you want a managed service, choose between Datadog (enterprise support) and Honeycomb (developer-focused). If not, fall back to open-source.
- **Terminal nodes (Tempo / Elastic / Honeycomb / Datadog)**: Each represents a concrete backend choice, all of which feed into the same final step.
- **Configure Collector**: Regardless of backend, you always finish by configuring the OTel Collector to export to your chosen destination.
---
## 7.3 Recommended Production Architecture
> **OTLP** = OpenTelemetry Protocol | **APM** = Application Performance Monitoring | **HA** = High Availability
```mermaid
flowchart TB
subgraph validators["Validator Nodes"]
v1[xrpld<br/>Validator 1]
v2[xrpld<br/>Validator 2]
end
subgraph stock["Stock Nodes"]
s1[xrpld<br/>Stock 1]
s2[xrpld<br/>Stock 2]
end
subgraph collector["OTel Collector Cluster"]
c1[Collector<br/>DC1]
c2[Collector<br/>DC2]
end
subgraph backends["Storage Backends"]
tempo[(Grafana<br/>Tempo)]
elastic[(Elastic<br/>APM)]
archive[(S3/GCS<br/>Archive)]
end
subgraph ui["Visualization"]
grafana[Grafana<br/>Dashboards]
end
v1 -->|OTLP| c1
v2 -->|OTLP| c1
s1 -->|OTLP| c2
s2 -->|OTLP| c2
c1 --> tempo
c1 --> elastic
c2 --> tempo
c2 --> archive
tempo --> grafana
elastic --> grafana
%% Note: simplified single-collector-per-DC topology shown for clarity
style validators fill:#b71c1c,stroke:#7f1d1d,color:#ffffff
style stock fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#ffffff
style collector fill:#bf360c,stroke:#8c2809,color:#ffffff
style backends fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#ffffff
style ui fill:#4a148c,stroke:#2e0d57,color:#ffffff
```
**Reading the diagram:**
- **Validator / Stock Nodes**: All xrpld nodes emit trace data via OTLP. Validators and stock nodes are grouped separately because they may reside in different network zones.
- **Collector Cluster (DC1, DC2)**: Regional collectors receive OTLP from nodes in their datacenter, apply processing (sampling, enrichment), and fan out to multiple backends.
- **Storage Backends**: Tempo and Elastic provide queryable trace storage; S3/GCS Archive provides long-term cold storage for compliance or post-incident analysis.
- **Grafana Dashboards**: The single visualization layer that queries both Tempo and Elastic, giving operators a unified view of all traces.
- **Data flow direction**: Nodes → Collectors → Storage → Grafana. Each arrow represents a network hop; minimizing collector-to-backend hops reduces latency.
> **Note**: Production deployments should use multiple collector instances behind a load balancer for high availability. The diagram shows a simplified single-collector topology for clarity.
---
## 7.4 Architecture Considerations
### 7.4.1 Collector Placement
| Strategy | Description | Pros | Cons |
| ------------- | -------------------- | ------------------------ | ----------------------- |
| **Sidecar** | Collector per node | Isolation, simple config | Resource overhead |
| **DaemonSet** | Collector per host | Shared resources | Complexity |
| **Gateway** | Central collector(s) | Centralized processing | Single point of failure |
**Recommendation**: Use **Gateway** pattern with regional collectors for xrpld networks:
- One collector cluster per datacenter/region
- Tail-based sampling at collector level
- Multiple export destinations for redundancy
### 7.4.2 Sampling Strategy
```mermaid
flowchart LR
subgraph head["Head Sampling (Node)"]
hs[Node-level head sampling<br/>configurable, default: 100%<br/>recommended production: 10%]
end
subgraph tail["Tail Sampling (Collector)"]
ts1[Keep all errors]
ts2[Keep slow >5s]
ts3[Keep 10% rest]
end
head --> tail
ts1 --> final[Final Traces]
ts2 --> final
ts3 --> final
style head fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#fff
style tail fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#fff
style hs fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#fff
style ts1 fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#fff
style ts2 fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#fff
style ts3 fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#fff
style final fill:#bf360c,stroke:#8c2809,color:#fff
```
**Reading the diagram:**
- **Head Sampling (Node)**: The first filter -- each xrpld node decides whether to sample a trace at creation time (default 100%, recommended 10% in production). This controls the volume leaving the node.
- **Tail Sampling (Collector)**: The second filter -- the collector inspects completed traces and applies rules: keep all errors, keep anything slower than 5 seconds, and keep 10% of the remainder.
- **Arrow head → tail**: All head-sampled traces flow to the collector, where tail sampling further reduces volume while preserving the most valuable data.
- **Final Traces**: The output after both sampling stages; this is what gets stored and queried. The two-stage approach balances cost with debuggability.
### 7.4.3 Data Retention
| Environment | Hot Storage | Warm Storage | Cold Archive |
| ----------- | ----------- | ------------ | ------------ |
| Development | 24 hours | N/A | N/A |
| Staging | 7 days | N/A | N/A |
| Production | 7 days | 30 days | many years |
---
## 7.5 Integration Checklist
- [ ] Choose primary backend (Tempo recommended for cost/features)
- [ ] Deploy collector cluster with high availability
- [ ] Configure tail-based sampling for error/latency traces
- [ ] Set up Grafana dashboards for trace visualization
- [ ] Configure alerts for trace anomalies
- [ ] Establish data retention policies
- [ ] Test trace correlation with logs and metrics
---
## 7.6 Grafana Dashboard Examples
Pre-built dashboards for xrpld observability.
### 7.6.1 Consensus Health Dashboard
```json
{
"title": "xrpld Consensus Health",
"uid": "xrpld-consensus-health",
"tags": ["xrpld", "consensus", "tracing"],
"panels": [
{
"title": "Consensus Round Duration",
"type": "timeseries",
"datasource": "Tempo",
"targets": [
{
"queryType": "traceql",
"query": "{resource.service.name=\"xrpld\" && name=\"consensus.round\"} | avg(duration) by (resource.service.instance.id)"
}
],
"fieldConfig": {
"defaults": {
"unit": "ms",
"thresholds": {
"steps": [
{ "color": "green", "value": null },
{ "color": "yellow", "value": 4000 },
{ "color": "red", "value": 5000 }
]
}
}
},
"gridPos": { "h": 8, "w": 12, "x": 0, "y": 0 }
},
{
"title": "Phase Duration Breakdown",
"type": "barchart",
"datasource": "Tempo",
"targets": [
{
"queryType": "traceql",
"query": "{resource.service.name=\"xrpld\" && name=~\"consensus.phase.*\"} | avg(duration) by (name)"
}
],
"gridPos": { "h": 8, "w": 12, "x": 12, "y": 0 }
},
{
"title": "Proposers per Round",
"type": "stat",
"datasource": "Tempo",
"targets": [
{
"queryType": "traceql",
"query": "{resource.service.name=\"xrpld\" && name=\"consensus.round\"} | avg(span.xrpl.consensus.proposers)"
}
],
"gridPos": { "h": 4, "w": 6, "x": 0, "y": 8 }
},
{
"title": "Recent Slow Rounds (>5s)",
"type": "table",
"datasource": "Tempo",
"targets": [
{
"queryType": "traceql",
"query": "{resource.service.name=\"xrpld\" && name=\"consensus.round\"} | duration > 5s"
}
],
"gridPos": { "h": 8, "w": 24, "x": 0, "y": 12 }
}
]
}
```
### 7.6.2 Node Overview Dashboard
```json
{
"title": "xrpld Node Overview",
"uid": "xrpld-node-overview",
"panels": [
{
"title": "Active Nodes",
"type": "stat",
"datasource": "Tempo",
"targets": [
{
"queryType": "traceql",
"query": "{resource.service.name=\"xrpld\"} | count_over_time() by (resource.service.instance.id) | count()"
}
],
"gridPos": { "h": 4, "w": 4, "x": 0, "y": 0 }
},
{
"title": "Total Transactions (1h)",
"type": "stat",
"datasource": "Tempo",
"targets": [
{
"queryType": "traceql",
"query": "{resource.service.name=\"xrpld\" && name=\"tx.receive\"} | count()"
}
],
"gridPos": { "h": 4, "w": 4, "x": 4, "y": 0 }
},
{
"title": "Error Rate",
"type": "gauge",
"datasource": "Tempo",
"targets": [
{
"queryType": "traceql",
"query": "{resource.service.name=\"xrpld\" && status.code=error} | rate() / {resource.service.name=\"xrpld\"} | rate() * 100"
}
],
"fieldConfig": {
"defaults": {
"unit": "percent",
"max": 10,
"thresholds": {
"steps": [
{ "color": "green", "value": null },
{ "color": "yellow", "value": 1 },
{ "color": "red", "value": 5 }
]
}
}
},
"gridPos": { "h": 4, "w": 4, "x": 8, "y": 0 }
},
{
"title": "Service Map",
"type": "nodeGraph",
"datasource": "Tempo",
"gridPos": { "h": 12, "w": 12, "x": 12, "y": 0 }
}
]
}
```
### 7.6.3 Alert Rules
```yaml
# grafana/provisioning/alerting/rippled-alerts.yaml
apiVersion: 1
groups:
- name: xrpld-tracing-alerts
folder: xrpld
interval: 1m
rules:
- uid: consensus-slow
title: Consensus Round Slow
condition: A
data:
- refId: A
datasourceUid: tempo
model:
queryType: traceql
query: '{resource.service.name="xrpld" && name="consensus.round"} | avg(duration) > 5s'
# Note: Verify TraceQL aggregate queries are supported by your
# Tempo version. Aggregate alerting (e.g., avg(duration)) requires
# Tempo 2.3+ with TraceQL metrics enabled.
for: 5m
annotations:
summary: Consensus rounds taking >5 seconds
description: "Consensus duration: {{ $value }}ms"
labels:
severity: warning
- uid: rpc-error-spike
title: RPC Error Rate Spike
condition: B
data:
- refId: B
datasourceUid: tempo
model:
queryType: traceql
query: '{resource.service.name="xrpld" && name=~"rpc.command.*" && status.code=error} | rate() > 0.05'
# Note: Verify TraceQL aggregate queries are supported by your
# Tempo version. Aggregate alerting (e.g., rate()) requires
# Tempo 2.3+ with TraceQL metrics enabled.
for: 2m
annotations:
summary: RPC error rate >5%
labels:
severity: critical
- uid: tx-throughput-drop
title: Transaction Throughput Drop
condition: C
data:
- refId: C
datasourceUid: tempo
model:
queryType: traceql
query: '{resource.service.name="xrpld" && name="tx.receive"} | rate() < 10'
for: 10m
annotations:
summary: Transaction throughput below threshold
labels:
severity: warning
```
---
## 7.7 PerfLog and Insight Correlation
> **OTLP** = OpenTelemetry Protocol
How to correlate OpenTelemetry traces with existing xrpld observability.
### 7.7.1 Correlation Architecture
```mermaid
flowchart TB
subgraph xrpld["xrpld Node"]
otel[OpenTelemetry<br/>Spans]
perflog[PerfLog<br/>JSON Logs]
insight[Beast Insight<br/>StatsD Metrics]
end
subgraph collectors["Data Collection"]
otelc[OTel Collector]
promtail[Promtail/Fluentd]
statsd[StatsD Exporter]
end
subgraph storage["Storage"]
tempo[(Tempo)]
loki[(Loki)]
prom[(Prometheus)]
end
subgraph grafana["Grafana"]
traces[Trace View]
logs[Log View]
metrics[Metrics View]
corr[Correlation<br/>Panel]
end
otel -->|OTLP| otelc --> tempo
perflog -->|JSON| promtail --> loki
insight -->|StatsD| statsd --> prom
tempo --> traces
loki --> logs
prom --> metrics
traces --> corr
logs --> corr
metrics --> corr
style xrpld fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#fff
style collectors fill:#bf360c,stroke:#8c2809,color:#fff
style storage fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#fff
style grafana fill:#4a148c,stroke:#2e0d57,color:#fff
style otel fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#fff
style perflog fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#fff
style insight fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#fff
style otelc fill:#bf360c,stroke:#8c2809,color:#fff
style promtail fill:#bf360c,stroke:#8c2809,color:#fff
style statsd fill:#bf360c,stroke:#8c2809,color:#fff
style tempo fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#fff
style loki fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#fff
style prom fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#fff
style traces fill:#4a148c,stroke:#2e0d57,color:#fff
style logs fill:#4a148c,stroke:#2e0d57,color:#fff
style metrics fill:#4a148c,stroke:#2e0d57,color:#fff
style corr fill:#4a148c,stroke:#2e0d57,color:#fff
```
**Reading the diagram:**
- **xrpld Node (three sources)**: A single node emits three independent data streams -- OpenTelemetry spans, PerfLog JSON logs, and Beast Insight StatsD metrics.
- **Data Collection layer**: Each stream has its own collector -- OTel Collector for spans, Promtail/Fluentd for logs, and a StatsD exporter for metrics. They operate independently.
- **Storage layer (Tempo, Loki, Prometheus)**: Each data type lands in a purpose-built store optimized for its query patterns (trace search, log grep, metric aggregation).
- **Grafana Correlation Panel**: The key integration point -- Grafana queries all three stores and links them via shared fields (`trace_id`, `xrpl.tx.hash`, `ledger_seq`), enabling a single-pane debugging experience.
### 7.7.2 Correlation Fields
| Source | Field | Link To | Purpose |
| ----------- | --------------------------- | ------------- | -------------------------- |
| **Trace** | `trace_id` | Logs | Find log entries for trace |
| **Trace** | `xrpl.tx.hash` | Logs, Metrics | Find TX-related data |
| **Trace** | `xrpl.consensus.ledger.seq` | Logs | Find ledger-related logs |
| **PerfLog** | `trace_id` (new) | Traces | Jump to trace from log |
| **PerfLog** | `ledger_seq` | Traces | Find consensus trace |
| **Insight** | `exemplar.trace_id` | Traces | Jump from metric spike |
### 7.7.3 Example: Debugging a Slow Transaction
**Step 1: Find the trace**
```
# In Grafana Explore with Tempo
{resource.service.name="xrpld" && span.xrpl.tx.hash="ABC123..."}
```
**Step 2: Get the trace_id from the trace view**
```
Trace ID: 4bf92f3577b34da6a3ce929d0e0e4736
```
**Step 3: Find related PerfLog entries**
```
# In Grafana Explore with Loki
{job="xrpld"} |= "4bf92f3577b34da6a3ce929d0e0e4736"
```
**Step 4: Check Insight metrics for the time window**
```
# In Grafana with Prometheus
rate(xrpld_tx_applied_total[1m])
@ timestamp_from_trace
```
### 7.7.4 Unified Dashboard Example
```json
{
"title": "xrpld Unified Observability",
"uid": "xrpld-unified",
"panels": [
{
"title": "Transaction Latency (Traces)",
"type": "timeseries",
"datasource": "Tempo",
"targets": [
{
"queryType": "traceql",
"query": "{resource.service.name=\"xrpld\" && name=\"tx.receive\"} | histogram_over_time(duration)"
}
],
"gridPos": { "h": 6, "w": 8, "x": 0, "y": 0 }
},
{
"title": "Transaction Rate (Metrics)",
"type": "timeseries",
"datasource": "Prometheus",
"targets": [
{
"expr": "rate(xrpld_tx_received_total[5m])",
"legendFormat": "{{ instance }}"
}
],
"fieldConfig": {
"defaults": {
"links": [
{
"title": "View traces",
"url": "/explore?left={\"datasource\":\"Tempo\",\"query\":\"{resource.service.name=\\\"xrpld\\\" && name=\\\"tx.receive\\\"}\"}"
}
]
}
},
"gridPos": { "h": 6, "w": 8, "x": 8, "y": 0 }
},
{
"title": "Recent Logs",
"type": "logs",
"datasource": "Loki",
"targets": [
{
"expr": "{job=\"xrpld\"} | json"
}
],
"gridPos": { "h": 6, "w": 8, "x": 16, "y": 0 }
},
{
"title": "Trace Search",
"type": "table",
"datasource": "Tempo",
"targets": [
{
"queryType": "traceql",
"query": "{resource.service.name=\"xrpld\"}"
}
],
"fieldConfig": {
"overrides": [
{
"matcher": { "id": "byName", "options": "traceID" },
"properties": [
{
"id": "links",
"value": [
{
"title": "View trace",
"url": "/explore?left={\"datasource\":\"Tempo\",\"query\":\"${__value.raw}\"}"
},
{
"title": "View logs",
"url": "/explore?left={\"datasource\":\"Loki\",\"query\":\"{job=\\\"xrpld\\\"} |= \\\"${__value.raw}\\\"\"}"
}
]
}
]
}
]
},
"gridPos": { "h": 12, "w": 24, "x": 0, "y": 6 }
}
]
}
```
---
_Previous: [Implementation Phases](./06-implementation-phases.md)_ | _Next: [Appendix](./08-appendix.md)_ | _Back to: [Overview](./OpenTelemetryPlan.md)_

View File

@@ -1,201 +0,0 @@
# Appendix
> **Parent Document**: [OpenTelemetryPlan.md](./OpenTelemetryPlan.md)
> **Related**: [Observability Backends](./07-observability-backends.md)
---
## 8.1 Glossary
> **OTLP** = OpenTelemetry Protocol | **TxQ** = Transaction Queue
| Term | Definition |
| --------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------- |
| **Span** | A unit of work with start/end time, name, and attributes |
| **Trace** | A collection of spans representing a complete request flow |
| **Trace ID** | 128-bit unique identifier for a trace |
| **Span ID** | 64-bit unique identifier for a span within a trace |
| **Context** | Carrier for trace/span IDs across boundaries |
| **Propagator** | Component that injects/extracts context |
| **Sampler** | Decides which traces to record |
| **Exporter** | Sends spans to backend |
| **Collector** | Receives, processes, and forwards telemetry |
| **OTLP** | OpenTelemetry Protocol (wire format) |
| **W3C Trace Context** | Standard HTTP headers for trace propagation |
| **Baggage** | Key-value pairs propagated across service boundaries |
| **Resource** | Entity producing telemetry (service, host, etc.) |
| **Instrumentation** | Code that creates telemetry data |
### xrpld-Specific Terms
| Term | Definition |
| ----------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------- |
| **Overlay** | P2P network layer managing peer connections |
| **Consensus** | XRP Ledger consensus algorithm (RCL) |
| **Proposal** | Validator's suggested transaction set for a ledger |
| **Validation** | Validator's signature on a closed ledger |
| **HashRouter** | Component for transaction deduplication |
| **JobQueue** | Thread pool for asynchronous task execution |
| **PerfLog** | Existing performance logging system in xrpld |
| **Beast Insight** | Existing metrics framework in xrpld |
| **PathFinding** | Payment path computation engine for cross-currency payments |
| **TxQ** | Transaction queue managing fee-based prioritization |
| **LoadManager** | Dynamic fee escalation based on network load |
| **SHAMap** | SHA-256 hash-based map (Merkle trie variant) for ledger state |
---
## 8.2 Span Hierarchy Visualization
> **TxQ** = Transaction Queue
```mermaid
flowchart TB
subgraph trace["Trace: Transaction Lifecycle"]
rpc["rpc.request<br/>(entry point)"]
validate["tx.validate"]
relay["tx.relay<br/>(parent span)"]
subgraph peers["Peer Spans"]
p1["peer.send<br/>Peer A"]
p2["peer.send<br/>Peer B"]
p3["peer.send<br/>Peer C"]
end
subgraph pathfinding["PathFinding Spans"]
pathfind["pathfind.request"]
pathcomp["pathfind.compute"]
end
consensus["consensus.round"]
apply["tx.apply"]
subgraph txqueue["TxQ Spans"]
txq["txq.enqueue"]
txqApply["txq.apply"]
end
feeCalc["fee.escalate"]
end
subgraph validators["Validator Spans"]
valFetch["validator.list.fetch"]
valManifest["validator.manifest"]
end
rpc --> validate
rpc --> pathfind
pathfind --> pathcomp
validate --> relay
relay --> p1
relay --> p2
relay --> p3
p1 -.->|"context propagation"| consensus
consensus --> apply
apply --> txq
txq --> txqApply
txq --> feeCalc
style trace fill:#0f172a,stroke:#020617,color:#fff
style peers fill:#1e3a8a,stroke:#172554,color:#fff
style pathfinding fill:#134e4a,stroke:#0f766e,color:#fff
style txqueue fill:#064e3b,stroke:#047857,color:#fff
style validators fill:#4c1d95,stroke:#6d28d9,color:#fff
style rpc fill:#1d4ed8,stroke:#1e40af,color:#fff
style validate fill:#047857,stroke:#064e3b,color:#fff
style relay fill:#047857,stroke:#064e3b,color:#fff
style p1 fill:#0e7490,stroke:#155e75,color:#fff
style p2 fill:#0e7490,stroke:#155e75,color:#fff
style p3 fill:#0e7490,stroke:#155e75,color:#fff
style consensus fill:#fef3c7,stroke:#fde68a,color:#1e293b
style apply fill:#047857,stroke:#064e3b,color:#fff
style pathfind fill:#0e7490,stroke:#155e75,color:#fff
style pathcomp fill:#0e7490,stroke:#155e75,color:#fff
style txq fill:#047857,stroke:#064e3b,color:#fff
style txqApply fill:#047857,stroke:#064e3b,color:#fff
style feeCalc fill:#047857,stroke:#064e3b,color:#fff
style valFetch fill:#6d28d9,stroke:#4c1d95,color:#fff
style valManifest fill:#6d28d9,stroke:#4c1d95,color:#fff
```
**Reading the diagram:**
- **rpc.request (blue, top)**: The entry point — every traced transaction starts as an RPC call; this root span is the parent of all downstream work.
- **tx.validate and pathfind.request (green/teal, first fork)**: The RPC request fans out into transaction validation and, for cross-currency payments, a PathFinding branch (`pathfind.request` -> `pathfind.compute`).
- **tx.relay -> Peer Spans (teal, middle)**: After validation, the transaction is relayed to peers A, B, and C in parallel; each `peer.send` is a sibling child span showing fan-out across the network.
- **context propagation (dashed arrow)**: The dotted line from `peer.send Peer A` to `consensus.round` represents the trace context crossing a node boundary — the receiving validator picks up the same `trace_id` and continues the trace.
- **consensus.round -> tx.apply -> TxQ Spans (green, lower)**: Once consensus accepts the transaction, it is applied to the ledger; the TxQ spans (`txq.enqueue`, `txq.apply`, `fee.escalate`) capture queue depth and fee escalation behavior.
- **Validator Spans (purple, detached)**: `validator.list.fetch` and `validator.manifest` are independent workflows for UNL management — they run on their own traces and are linked to consensus via Span Links, not parent-child relationships.
---
## 8.3 References
> **OTLP** = OpenTelemetry Protocol
### OpenTelemetry Resources
1. [OpenTelemetry C++ SDK](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-cpp)
2. [OpenTelemetry Specification](https://opentelemetry.io/docs/specs/otel/)
3. [OpenTelemetry Collector](https://opentelemetry.io/docs/collector/)
4. [OTLP Protocol Specification](https://opentelemetry.io/docs/specs/otlp/)
### Standards
5. [W3C Trace Context](https://www.w3.org/TR/trace-context/)
6. [W3C Baggage](https://www.w3.org/TR/baggage/)
7. [Protocol Buffers](https://protobuf.dev/)
### xrpld Resources
8. [xrpld Source Code](https://github.com/XRPLF/rippled)
9. [XRP Ledger Documentation](https://xrpl.org/docs/)
10. [xrpld Overlay README](https://github.com/XRPLF/rippled/blob/develop/src/xrpld/overlay/README.md)
11. [xrpld RPC README](https://github.com/XRPLF/rippled/blob/develop/src/xrpld/rpc/README.md)
12. [xrpld Consensus README](https://github.com/XRPLF/rippled/blob/develop/src/xrpld/app/consensus/README.md)
---
## 8.4 Version History
| Version | Date | Author | Changes |
| ------- | ---------- | ------ | -------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 1.0 | 2026-02-12 | - | Initial implementation plan |
| 1.1 | 2026-02-13 | - | Refactored into modular documents |
| 1.2 | 2026-03-24 | - | Review fixes: accuracy corrections, cross-document consistency |
---
## 8.5 Document Index
### Plan Documents
| Document | Description |
| ---------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------- |
| [OpenTelemetryPlan.md](./OpenTelemetryPlan.md) | Master overview and executive summary |
| [00-tracing-fundamentals.md](./00-tracing-fundamentals.md) | Distributed tracing concepts and OTel primer |
| [01-architecture-analysis.md](./01-architecture-analysis.md) | xrpld architecture and trace points |
| [02-design-decisions.md](./02-design-decisions.md) | SDK selection, exporters, span conventions |
| [03-implementation-strategy.md](./03-implementation-strategy.md) | Directory structure, performance analysis |
| [04-code-samples.md](./04-code-samples.md) | C++ code examples for all components |
| [05-configuration-reference.md](./05-configuration-reference.md) | xrpld config, CMake, Collector configs |
| [06-implementation-phases.md](./06-implementation-phases.md) | Timeline, tasks, risks, success metrics |
| [07-observability-backends.md](./07-observability-backends.md) | Backend selection and architecture |
| [08-appendix.md](./08-appendix.md) | Glossary, references, version history |
| [secure-OTel.md](./secure-OTel.md) | Threat model and hardening (mTLS, peer validation) |
| [presentation.md](./presentation.md) | Slide deck for OTel plan overview |
### Task Lists
| Document | Description |
| ------------------------------------------ | --------------------------------------------------- |
| [POC_taskList.md](./POC_taskList.md) | Proof-of-concept telemetry integration |
| [Phase2_taskList.md](./Phase2_taskList.md) | RPC layer trace instrumentation |
| [Phase3_taskList.md](./Phase3_taskList.md) | Peer overlay & consensus tracing |
| [Phase4_taskList.md](./Phase4_taskList.md) | Transaction lifecycle tracing |
| [Phase5_taskList.md](./Phase5_taskList.md) | Ledger processing & advanced tracing |
| [presentation.md](./presentation.md) | Presentation slides for OpenTelemetry plan overview |
---
_Previous: [Observability Backends](./07-observability-backends.md)_ | _Back to: [Overview](./OpenTelemetryPlan.md)_

View File

@@ -1,243 +0,0 @@
# [OpenTelemetry](00-tracing-fundamentals.md) Distributed Tracing Implementation Plan for xrpld (xrpld)
## Executive Summary
> **OTLP** = OpenTelemetry Protocol
This document provides a comprehensive implementation plan for integrating OpenTelemetry distributed tracing into the xrpld XRP Ledger node software. The plan addresses the unique challenges of a decentralized peer-to-peer system where trace context must propagate across network boundaries between independent nodes.
### Key Benefits
- **End-to-end transaction visibility**: Track transactions from submission through consensus to ledger inclusion
- **Consensus round analysis**: Understand timing and behavior of consensus phases across validators
- **RPC performance insights**: Identify slow handlers and optimize response times
- **Network topology understanding**: Visualize message propagation patterns between peers
- **Incident debugging**: Correlate events across distributed nodes during issues
### Estimated Performance Overhead
| Metric | Overhead | Notes |
| ------------- | ---------- | ----------------------------------- |
| CPU | 1-3% | Span creation and attribute setting |
| Memory | 2-5 MB | Batch buffer for pending spans |
| Network | 10-50 KB/s | Compressed OTLP export to collector |
| Latency (p99) | <2% | With proper sampling configuration |
---
## Document Structure
This implementation plan is organized into modular documents for easier navigation:
<div align="center">
```mermaid
flowchart TB
overview["📋 OpenTelemetryPlan.md<br/>(This Document)"]
subgraph fundamentals["Fundamentals"]
fund["00-tracing-fundamentals.md"]
end
subgraph analysis["Analysis & Design"]
arch["01-architecture-analysis.md"]
design["02-design-decisions.md"]
end
subgraph impl["Implementation"]
strategy["03-implementation-strategy.md"]
code["04-code-samples.md"]
config["05-configuration-reference.md"]
end
subgraph deploy["Deployment & Planning"]
phases["06-implementation-phases.md"]
backends["07-observability-backends.md"]
appendix["08-appendix.md"]
secure["secure-OTel.md"]
poc["POC_taskList.md"]
end
overview --> fundamentals
overview --> analysis
overview --> impl
overview --> deploy
fund --> arch
arch --> design
design --> strategy
strategy --> code
code --> config
config --> phases
phases --> backends
backends --> appendix
backends --> secure
phases --> poc
style overview fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#fff,stroke-width:2px
style fundamentals fill:#00695c,stroke:#004d40,color:#fff
style fund fill:#00695c,stroke:#004d40,color:#fff
style analysis fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#fff
style impl fill:#bf360c,stroke:#8c2809,color:#fff
style deploy fill:#4a148c,stroke:#2e0d57,color:#fff
style arch fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#fff
style design fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#fff
style strategy fill:#bf360c,stroke:#8c2809,color:#fff
style code fill:#bf360c,stroke:#8c2809,color:#fff
style config fill:#bf360c,stroke:#8c2809,color:#fff
style phases fill:#4a148c,stroke:#2e0d57,color:#fff
style backends fill:#4a148c,stroke:#2e0d57,color:#fff
style appendix fill:#4a148c,stroke:#2e0d57,color:#fff
style secure fill:#4a148c,stroke:#2e0d57,color:#fff
style poc fill:#4a148c,stroke:#2e0d57,color:#fff
```
</div>
---
## Table of Contents
| Section | Document | Description |
| ------- | ---------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| **0** | [Tracing Fundamentals](./00-tracing-fundamentals.md) | Distributed tracing concepts, span relationships, context propagation |
| **1** | [Architecture Analysis](./01-architecture-analysis.md) | xrpld component analysis, trace points, instrumentation priorities |
| **2** | [Design Decisions](./02-design-decisions.md) | SDK selection, exporters, span naming, attributes, context propagation |
| **3** | [Implementation Strategy](./03-implementation-strategy.md) | Directory structure, key principles, performance optimization |
| **4** | [Code Samples](./04-code-samples.md) | C++ implementation examples for core infrastructure and key modules |
| **5** | [Configuration Reference](./05-configuration-reference.md) | xrpld config, CMake integration, Collector configurations |
| **6** | [Implementation Phases](./06-implementation-phases.md) | 5-phase timeline, tasks, risks, success metrics |
| **7** | [Observability Backends](./07-observability-backends.md) | Backend selection guide and production architecture |
| **8** | [Appendix](./08-appendix.md) | Glossary, references, version history |
| **Sec** | [Securing the OTel Pipeline](./secure-OTel.md) | Threat model and hardening (mTLS, peer trace-context validation) |
| **POC** | [POC Task List](./POC_taskList.md) | Proof of concept tasks for RPC tracing end-to-end demo |
---
## 0. Tracing Fundamentals
This document introduces distributed tracing concepts for readers unfamiliar with the domain. It covers what traces and spans are, how parent-child and follows-from relationships model causality, how context propagates across service boundaries, and how sampling controls data volume. It also maps these concepts to xrpld-specific scenarios like transaction relay and consensus.
➡️ **[Read Tracing Fundamentals](./00-tracing-fundamentals.md)**
---
## 1. Architecture Analysis
> **WS** = WebSocket | **TxQ** = Transaction Queue
The xrpld node consists of several key components that require instrumentation for comprehensive distributed tracing. The main areas include the RPC server (HTTP/WebSocket), Overlay P2P network, Consensus mechanism (RCLConsensus), JobQueue for async task execution, PathFinding, Transaction Queue (TxQ), fee escalation (LoadManager), ledger acquisition, validator management, and existing observability infrastructure (PerfLog, Insight/StatsD, Journal logging).
Key trace points span across transaction submission via RPC, peer-to-peer message propagation, consensus round execution, ledger building, path computation, transaction queue behavior, fee escalation, and validator health. The implementation prioritizes high-value, low-risk components first: RPC handlers provide immediate value with minimal risk, while consensus tracing requires careful implementation to avoid timing impacts.
➡️ **[Read full Architecture Analysis](./01-architecture-analysis.md)**
---
## 2. Design Decisions
> **OTLP** = OpenTelemetry Protocol | **CNCF** = Cloud Native Computing Foundation
The OpenTelemetry C++ SDK is selected for its CNCF backing, active development, and native performance characteristics. Traces are exported via OTLP/gRPC (primary) or OTLP/HTTP (fallback) to an OpenTelemetry Collector, which provides flexible routing and sampling.
Span naming follows a hierarchical `<component>.<operation>` convention (e.g., `rpc.submit`, `tx.relay`, `consensus.round`). Context propagation uses W3C Trace Context headers for HTTP and embedded Protocol Buffer fields for P2P messages. The implementation coexists with existing PerfLog and Insight observability systems through correlation IDs.
**Data Collection & Privacy**: Telemetry collects only operational metadata (timing, counts, hashes) — never sensitive content (private keys, balances, amounts, raw payloads). Privacy protection includes account hashing, configurable redaction, sampling, and collector-level filtering. Node operators retain full control over telemetry configuration.
➡️ **[Read full Design Decisions](./02-design-decisions.md)**
---
## 3. Implementation Strategy
The telemetry code is organized under `include/xrpl/telemetry/` for headers and `src/libxrpl/telemetry/` for implementation. Key principles include RAII-based span management via `SpanGuard` (with `discard()` for dropping unwanted spans), a `FilteringSpanProcessor` that intercepts `OnEnd()` to prevent discarded spans from entering the export pipeline, conditional compilation with `XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY`, and minimal runtime overhead through batch processing and efficient sampling.
Performance optimization strategies include probabilistic head sampling (10% default), tail-based sampling at the collector for errors and slow traces, batch export to reduce network overhead, and conditional instrumentation that compiles to no-ops when disabled.
➡️ **[Read full Implementation Strategy](./03-implementation-strategy.md)**
---
## 4. Code Samples
C++ implementation examples are provided for the core telemetry infrastructure and key modules:
- `Telemetry.h` - Core interface for tracer access and span creation
- `SpanGuard.h` - RAII wrapper for automatic span lifecycle management with `discard()` support
- `DiscardFlag.h` - Thread-local flag for span discard signaling between SpanGuard and FilteringSpanProcessor
- `SpanGuard.cpp` - Pimpl implementation confining all OTel SDK types
- Protocol Buffer extensions for trace context propagation
- Module-specific instrumentation (RPC, Consensus, P2P, JobQueue)
- Remaining modules (PathFinding, TxQ, Validator, etc.) follow the same patterns
➡️ **[View all Code Samples](./04-code-samples.md)**
---
## 5. Configuration Reference
> **OTLP** = OpenTelemetry Protocol | **APM** = Application Performance Monitoring
Configuration is handled through the `[telemetry]` section in `xrpld.cfg` with options for enabling/disabling, exporter selection, endpoint configuration, sampling ratios, and component-level filtering. CMake integration includes a `XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY` option for compile-time control.
OpenTelemetry Collector configurations are provided for development and production (with tail-based sampling, Tempo, and Elastic APM). Docker Compose examples enable quick local development environment setup.
➡️ **[View full Configuration Reference](./05-configuration-reference.md)**
---
## 6. Implementation Phases
The implementation spans 9 weeks across 5 phases:
| Phase | Duration | Focus | Key Deliverables |
| ----- | --------- | ------------------- | --------------------------------------------------- |
| 1 | Weeks 1-2 | Core Infrastructure | SDK integration, Telemetry interface, Configuration |
| 2 | Weeks 3-4 | RPC Tracing | HTTP context extraction, Handler instrumentation |
| 3 | Weeks 5-6 | Transaction Tracing | Protocol Buffer context, Relay propagation |
| 4 | Weeks 7-8 | Consensus Tracing | Round spans, Proposal/validation tracing |
| 5 | Week 9 | Documentation | Runbook, Dashboards, Training |
**Total Effort**: 47 person-days (2 developers working in parallel)
➡️ **[View full Implementation Phases](./06-implementation-phases.md)**
---
## 7. Observability Backends
> **APM** = Application Performance Monitoring | **GCS** = Google Cloud Storage
Grafana Tempo is recommended for all environments due to its cost-effectiveness and Grafana integration, while Elastic APM is ideal for organizations with existing Elastic infrastructure.
The recommended production architecture uses a gateway collector pattern with regional collectors performing tail-based sampling, routing traces to multiple backends (Tempo for primary storage, Elastic for log correlation, S3/GCS for long-term archive).
➡️ **[View Observability Backend Recommendations](./07-observability-backends.md)**
---
## 8. Appendix
The appendix contains a glossary of OpenTelemetry and xrpld-specific terms, references to external documentation and specifications, version history for this implementation plan, and a complete document index.
➡️ **[View Appendix](./08-appendix.md)**
---
## Securing the OTel Pipeline
Threat model and hardening guidance for production deployments where xrpld nodes ship telemetry to a centrally-hosted collector across an untrusted network. Covers the two attack surfaces (collector ingress and peer trace-context spoofing) and the chosen defenses: mTLS as primary collector auth, NetworkPolicy as defense-in-depth, and source-side validation plus per-peer rate limiting for the `protocol::TraceContext` field on peer messages.
➡️ **[View Securing the OTel Pipeline](./secure-OTel.md)**
---
## POC Task List
A step-by-step task list for building a minimal end-to-end proof of concept that demonstrates distributed tracing in xrpld. The POC scope is limited to RPC tracing — showing request traces flowing from xrpld through an OpenTelemetry Collector into Tempo, viewable in Grafana.
➡️ **[View POC Task List](./POC_taskList.md)**
---
_This document provides a comprehensive implementation plan for integrating OpenTelemetry distributed tracing into the xrpld XRP Ledger node software. For detailed information on any section, follow the links to the corresponding sub-documents._

View File

@@ -1,628 +0,0 @@
# OpenTelemetry POC Task List
> **Goal**: Build a minimal end-to-end proof of concept that demonstrates distributed tracing in xrpld. A successful POC will show RPC request traces flowing from xrpld through an OTel Collector into Tempo, viewable in Grafana.
>
> **Scope**: RPC tracing only (highest value, lowest risk per the [CRAWL phase](./06-implementation-phases.md#6102-quick-wins-immediate-value) in the implementation phases). No cross-node P2P context propagation or consensus tracing in the POC.
### Related Plan Documents
| Document | Relevance to POC |
| ---------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| [00-tracing-fundamentals.md](./00-tracing-fundamentals.md) | Core concepts: traces, spans, context propagation, sampling |
| [01-architecture-analysis.md](./01-architecture-analysis.md) | RPC request flow (§1.5), key trace points (§1.6), instrumentation priority (§1.7) |
| [02-design-decisions.md](./02-design-decisions.md) | SDK selection (§2.1), exporter config (§2.2), span naming (§2.3), attribute schema (§2.4), coexistence with PerfLog/Insight (§2.6) |
| [03-implementation-strategy.md](./03-implementation-strategy.md) | Directory structure (§3.1), key principles (§3.2), performance overhead (§3.3-3.6), conditional compilation (§3.7.3), code intrusiveness (§3.9) |
| [04-code-samples.md](./04-code-samples.md) | Telemetry interface (§4.1), SpanGuard factory methods (§4.2-4.3), RPC instrumentation (§4.5.3) |
| [05-configuration-reference.md](./05-configuration-reference.md) | xrpld config (§5.1), config parser (§5.2), Application integration (§5.3), CMake (§5.4), Collector config (§5.5), Docker Compose (§5.6), Grafana (§5.8) |
| [06-implementation-phases.md](./06-implementation-phases.md) | Phase 1 core tasks (§6.2), Phase 2 RPC tasks (§6.3), quick wins (§6.10), definition of done (§6.11) |
| [07-observability-backends.md](./07-observability-backends.md) | Tempo dev setup (§7.1), Grafana dashboards (§7.6), alert rules (§7.6.3) |
---
## Task 0: Docker Observability Stack Setup
> **OTLP** = OpenTelemetry Protocol
**Objective**: Stand up the backend infrastructure to receive, store, and display traces.
**What to do**:
- Create `docker/telemetry/docker-compose.yml` in the repo with three services:
1. **OpenTelemetry Collector** (`otel/opentelemetry-collector-contrib:0.92.0`)
- Expose ports `4317` (OTLP gRPC) and `4318` (OTLP HTTP)
- Expose port `13133` (health check)
- Mount a config file `docker/telemetry/otel-collector-config.yaml`
2. **Tempo** (`grafana/tempo:2.6.1`)
- Expose port `3200` (HTTP API) and `4317` (OTLP gRPC, internal)
3. **Grafana** (`grafana/grafana:latest`) — optional but useful
- Expose port `3000`
- Enable anonymous admin access for local dev (`GF_AUTH_ANONYMOUS_ENABLED=true`, `GF_AUTH_ANONYMOUS_ORG_ROLE=Admin`)
- Provision Tempo as a data source via `docker/telemetry/grafana/provisioning/datasources/tempo.yaml`
- Create `docker/telemetry/otel-collector-config.yaml`:
```yaml
receivers:
otlp:
protocols:
grpc:
endpoint: 0.0.0.0:4317
http:
endpoint: 0.0.0.0:4318
processors:
batch:
timeout: 1s
send_batch_size: 100
exporters:
logging:
verbosity: detailed
otlp/tempo:
endpoint: tempo:4317
tls:
insecure: true
service:
pipelines:
traces:
receivers: [otlp]
processors: [batch]
exporters: [logging, otlp/tempo]
```
- Create Grafana Tempo datasource provisioning file at `docker/telemetry/grafana/provisioning/datasources/tempo.yaml`:
```yaml
apiVersion: 1
datasources:
- name: Tempo
type: tempo
access: proxy
url: http://tempo:3200
```
**Verification**: Run `docker compose -f docker/telemetry/docker-compose.yml up -d`, then:
- `curl http://localhost:13133` returns healthy (Collector)
- `http://localhost:3000` opens Grafana (Tempo datasource available, no traces yet)
**Reference**:
- [05-configuration-reference.md §5.5](./05-configuration-reference.md) — Collector config (dev YAML with Tempo exporter)
- [05-configuration-reference.md §5.6](./05-configuration-reference.md) — Docker Compose development environment
- [07-observability-backends.md §7.1](./07-observability-backends.md) — Tempo quick start and backend selection
- [05-configuration-reference.md §5.8](./05-configuration-reference.md) — Grafana datasource provisioning and dashboards
---
## Task 1: Add OpenTelemetry C++ SDK Dependency
**Objective**: Make `opentelemetry-cpp` available to the build system.
**What to do**:
- Edit `conanfile.py` to add `opentelemetry-cpp` as an **optional** dependency. The gRPC otel plugin flag (`"grpc/*:otel_plugin": False`) in the existing conanfile may need to remain false — we pull the OTel SDK separately.
- Add a Conan option: `with_telemetry = [True, False]` defaulting to `False`
- When `with_telemetry` is `True`, add `opentelemetry-cpp` to `self.requires()`
- Required OTel Conan components: `opentelemetry-cpp` (which bundles api, sdk, and exporters). If the package isn't in Conan Center, consider using `FetchContent` in CMake or building from source as a fallback.
- Edit `CMakeLists.txt`:
- Add option: `option(XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY "Enable OpenTelemetry tracing" OFF)`
- When ON, `find_package(opentelemetry-cpp CONFIG REQUIRED)` and add compile definition `XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY`
- When OFF, do nothing (zero build impact)
- Verify the build succeeds with `-DXRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY=OFF` (no regressions) and with `-DXRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY=ON` (SDK links successfully).
**Key files**:
- `conanfile.py`
- `CMakeLists.txt`
**Reference**:
- [05-configuration-reference.md §5.4](./05-configuration-reference.md) — CMake integration, `FindOpenTelemetry.cmake`, `XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY` option
- [03-implementation-strategy.md §3.2](./03-implementation-strategy.md) — Key principle: zero-cost when disabled via compile-time flags
- [02-design-decisions.md §2.1](./02-design-decisions.md) — SDK selection rationale and required OTel components
---
## Task 2: Create Core Telemetry Interface and NullTelemetry
**Objective**: Define the `Telemetry` abstract interface and a no-op implementation so the rest of the codebase can reference telemetry without hard-depending on the OTel SDK.
**What to do**:
- Create `include/xrpl/telemetry/Telemetry.h`:
- Define `namespace xrpl::telemetry`
- Define `struct Telemetry::Setup` holding: `enabled`, `exporterEndpoint`, `samplingRatio`, `serviceName`, `serviceVersion`, `serviceInstanceId`, `traceRpc`, `traceTransactions`, `traceConsensus`, `tracePeer`
- Define abstract `class Telemetry` with:
- `virtual void start() = 0;`
- `virtual void stop() = 0;`
- `virtual bool isEnabled() const = 0;`
- `virtual nostd::shared_ptr<Tracer> getTracer(string_view name = "xrpld") = 0;`
- `virtual nostd::shared_ptr<Span> startSpan(string_view name, SpanKind kind = kInternal) = 0;`
- `virtual nostd::shared_ptr<Span> startSpan(string_view name, Context const& parentContext, SpanKind kind = kInternal) = 0;`
- `virtual bool shouldTraceRpc() const = 0;`
- `virtual bool shouldTraceTransactions() const = 0;`
- `virtual bool shouldTraceConsensus() const = 0;`
- Factory: `std::unique_ptr<Telemetry> makeTelemetry(Setup const&, beast::Journal);`
- Config parser: `Telemetry::Setup setupTelemetry(Section const&, std::string const& nodePublicKey, std::string const& version);`
- Create `include/xrpl/telemetry/SpanGuard.h`:
- RAII guard with static factory methods (`rpcSpan()`, `txSpan()`, `consensusSpan()`, etc.) that access the global `Telemetry::getInstance()` singleton internally.
- Uses pimpl idiom to hide all OTel types -- the public header has zero `opentelemetry/` includes.
- Convenience instance methods: `setAttribute()`, `setOk()`, `setStatus()`, `addEvent()`, `recordException()`, `context()`, `discard()`
- When `XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY` is not defined, the entire class compiles to a no-op stub.
- See [04-code-samples.md](./04-code-samples.md) §4.2-4.3 for the full API reference.
- Create `src/libxrpl/telemetry/NullTelemetry.cpp`:
- Implements `Telemetry` with all no-ops.
- `isEnabled()` returns `false`, `startSpan()` returns a noop span.
- This is used when `XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY` is OFF or `enabled=0` in config.
- Guard all OTel SDK headers behind `#ifdef XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY`. The `NullTelemetry` implementation should compile without the OTel SDK present.
**Key new files**:
- `include/xrpl/telemetry/Telemetry.h`
- `include/xrpl/telemetry/SpanGuard.h`
- `src/libxrpl/telemetry/NullTelemetry.cpp`
**Reference**:
- [04-code-samples.md §4.1](./04-code-samples.md) — Full `Telemetry` interface with `Setup` struct, lifecycle, tracer access, span creation, and component filtering methods
- [04-code-samples.md §4.2-4.3](./04-code-samples.md) — SpanGuard with factory methods, pimpl design, no-op stub, and discard support
- [03-implementation-strategy.md §3.1](./03-implementation-strategy.md) — Directory structure: `include/xrpl/telemetry/` for headers, `src/libxrpl/telemetry/` for implementation
- [03-implementation-strategy.md §3.7.3](./03-implementation-strategy.md) — Conditional instrumentation and zero-cost compile-time disabled pattern
---
## Task 3: Implement OTel-Backed Telemetry
> **OTLP** = OpenTelemetry Protocol
**Objective**: Implement the real `Telemetry` class that initializes the OTel SDK, configures the OTLP exporter and batch processor, and creates tracers/spans.
**What to do**:
- Create `src/libxrpl/telemetry/Telemetry.cpp` (compiled only when `XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY=ON`):
- `class TelemetryImpl : public Telemetry` that:
- In `start()`: creates a `TracerProvider` with:
- Resource attributes: `service.name`, `service.version`, `service.instance.id`
- An `OtlpHttpExporter` pointed at `setup.exporterEndpoint` (default `localhost:4318`)
- A `BatchSpanProcessor` with configurable batch size and delay
- A `TraceIdRatioBasedSampler` using `setup.samplingRatio`
- Sets the global `TracerProvider`
- In `stop()`: calls `ForceFlush()` then shuts down the provider
- In `startSpan()`: delegates to `getTracer()->StartSpan(name, ...)`
- `shouldTraceRpc()` etc. read from `Setup` fields
- Create `src/libxrpl/telemetry/TelemetryConfig.cpp`:
- `setupTelemetry()` parses the `[telemetry]` config section from `xrpld.cfg`
- Maps config keys: `enabled`, `exporter`, `endpoint`, `sampling_ratio`, `trace_rpc`, `trace_transactions`, `trace_consensus`, `trace_peer`
- Wire `makeTelemetry()` factory:
- If `setup.enabled` is true AND `XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY` is defined: return `TelemetryImpl`
- Otherwise: return `NullTelemetry`
- Add telemetry source files to CMake. When `XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY=ON`, compile `Telemetry.cpp` and `TelemetryConfig.cpp` and link against `opentelemetry-cpp::api`, `opentelemetry-cpp::sdk`, `opentelemetry-cpp::otlp_grpc_exporter`. When OFF, compile only `NullTelemetry.cpp`.
**Key new files**:
- `src/libxrpl/telemetry/Telemetry.cpp`
- `src/libxrpl/telemetry/TelemetryConfig.cpp`
**Key modified files**:
- `CMakeLists.txt` (add telemetry library target)
**Reference**:
- [04-code-samples.md §4.1](./04-code-samples.md) — `Telemetry` interface that `TelemetryImpl` must implement
- [05-configuration-reference.md §5.2](./05-configuration-reference.md) — `setupTelemetry()` config parser implementation
- [02-design-decisions.md §2.2](./02-design-decisions.md) — OTLP/gRPC exporter config (endpoint, TLS options)
- [02-design-decisions.md §2.4.1](./02-design-decisions.md) — Resource attributes: `service.name`, `service.version`, `service.instance.id`, `xrpl.network.id`
- [03-implementation-strategy.md §3.4](./03-implementation-strategy.md) — Per-operation CPU costs and overhead budget for span creation
- [03-implementation-strategy.md §3.5](./03-implementation-strategy.md) — Memory overhead: static (~456 KB) and dynamic (~1.2 MB) budgets
---
## Task 4: Integrate Telemetry into Application Lifecycle
**Objective**: Wire the `Telemetry` object into the `ServiceRegistry` / `Application` so all components can access it.
**What to do**:
- Edit `include/xrpl/core/ServiceRegistry.h`:
- Forward-declare `namespace telemetry { class Telemetry; }` inside `namespace xrpl`
- Add pure virtual method: `virtual telemetry::Telemetry& getTelemetry() = 0;`
- (`Application` extends `ServiceRegistry`, so this is automatically available on `Application` too)
- Edit `src/xrpld/app/main/Application.cpp` (the `ApplicationImp` class):
- Add member: `std::unique_ptr<telemetry::Telemetry> telemetry_;`
- In the member initializer list, construct telemetry with an empty
`serviceInstanceId` (node identity is not yet known):
```cpp
, telemetry_(
telemetry::makeTelemetry(
telemetry::setupTelemetry(
config_->section("telemetry"),
"", // Updated later via setServiceInstanceId()
BuildInfo::getVersionString()),
logs_->journal("Telemetry")))
```
- In `setup()`, after `nodeIdentity_` is resolved, inject the node
public key as the service instance ID:
```cpp
if (!config_->section("telemetry").exists("service_instance_id"))
telemetry_->setServiceInstanceId(
toBase58(TokenType::NodePublic, nodeIdentity_->first));
```
- In `start()`: call `telemetry_->start()`
- In `run()` (shutdown path): call `telemetry_->stop()` (to flush pending spans)
- Implement `getTelemetry()` override: return `*telemetry_`
- Add `[telemetry]` section to the example config `cfg/xrpld-example.cfg`:
```ini
# [telemetry]
# enabled=1
# endpoint=http://localhost:4318/v1/traces
# sampling_ratio=1.0
# trace_rpc=1
```
> **Access patterns**: Components holding `ServiceRegistry&` (e.g.
> `NetworkOPsImp`) call `registry_.get().getTelemetry()`. Components
> holding `Application&` (e.g. `ServerHandler`, `PeerImp`,
> `RCLConsensusAdaptor`) call `app_.getTelemetry()` directly. Both
> resolve to the same `Telemetry` instance.
**Key modified files**:
- `include/xrpl/core/ServiceRegistry.h`
- `src/xrpld/app/main/Application.cpp`
- `cfg/xrpld-example.cfg` (example config)
**Reference**:
- [05-configuration-reference.md §5.3](./05-configuration-reference.md) — `ApplicationImp` changes: member declaration, constructor init, `start()`/`stop()` wiring, `getTelemetry()` override
- [05-configuration-reference.md §5.1](./05-configuration-reference.md) — `[telemetry]` config section format and all option defaults
- [03-implementation-strategy.md §3.9.2](./03-implementation-strategy.md) — File impact assessment: `Application.cpp` ~15 lines added, ~3 changed (Low risk)
---
## Task 5: Add SpanGuard Factory Methods
**Objective**: Add static factory methods to SpanGuard that provide type-safe, one-liner instrumentation and compile to zero-cost no-ops when telemetry is disabled. This replaces the earlier macro-based approach (`TracingInstrumentation.h` has been removed).
**What to do**:
- Update `include/xrpl/telemetry/SpanGuard.h`:
- Add static factory methods that access the global `Telemetry::getInstance()` singleton and check the relevant component filter before creating a span:
```cpp
// Each factory checks the global Telemetry instance internally.
// No Telemetry& reference needed at the call site.
auto span = telemetry::SpanGuard::rpcSpan("rpc.request");
span.setAttribute("command", command);
span.setAttribute("rpc_status", status);
```
- Factory methods: `rpcSpan()`, `txSpan()`, `consensusSpan()`, `peerSpan()`, `ledgerSpan()`, `span()`
- Use the pimpl idiom to hide all OTel types from the public header (zero `opentelemetry/` includes)
- When `XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY` is NOT defined, the entire class compiles to a no-op stub with empty inline method bodies
- No separate `TracingInstrumentation.h` file is needed. All instrumentation call sites use `#include <xrpl/telemetry/SpanGuard.h>` directly.
**Key modified file**:
- `include/xrpl/telemetry/SpanGuard.h`
**Reference**:
- [04-code-samples.md §4.3](./04-code-samples.md) — SpanGuard API reference: factory methods, usage patterns, compile-time disabled behavior, and discard support
- [03-implementation-strategy.md §3.7.3](./03-implementation-strategy.md) — Conditional instrumentation pattern: factory methods handle compile-time and runtime checks internally
- [03-implementation-strategy.md §3.9.7](./03-implementation-strategy.md) — Before/after code examples showing minimal intrusiveness (~1-3 lines per instrumentation point)
---
## Task 6: Instrument RPC ServerHandler
> **WS** = WebSocket
**Objective**: Add tracing to the HTTP RPC entry point so every incoming RPC request creates a span.
**What to do**:
- Edit `src/xrpld/rpc/detail/ServerHandler.cpp`:
- `#include <xrpl/telemetry/SpanGuard.h>`
- In `ServerHandler::onRequest(Session& session)`:
- At the top of the method, add: `auto span = telemetry::SpanGuard::rpcSpan("rpc.request");`
- After the RPC command name is extracted, set attribute: `span.setAttribute("command", command);`
- After the response status is known, set: `span.setAttribute("http.status_code", static_cast<int64_t>(statusCode));`
- Wrap error paths with: `span.recordException(e);`
- In `ServerHandler::processRequest(...)`:
- Add a child span: `auto span = telemetry::SpanGuard::rpcSpan("rpc.process");`
- Set method attribute: `span.setAttribute("method", request_method);`
- In `ServerHandler::onWSMessage(...)` (WebSocket path):
- Add: `auto span = telemetry::SpanGuard::rpcSpan("rpc.ws.message");`
- The goal is to see spans like:
```
rpc.request
└── rpc.process
```
in Tempo/Grafana for every HTTP RPC call.
**Key modified file**:
- `src/xrpld/rpc/detail/ServerHandler.cpp` (~15-25 lines added)
**Reference**:
- [04-code-samples.md §4.5.3](./04-code-samples.md) — Complete `ServerHandler::onRequest()` instrumented code sample using SpanGuard factory methods
- [01-architecture-analysis.md §1.5](./01-architecture-analysis.md) — RPC request flow diagram: HTTP request -> attributes -> jobqueue.enqueue -> rpc.command -> response
- [01-architecture-analysis.md §1.6](./01-architecture-analysis.md) — Key trace points table: `rpc.request` in `ServerHandler.cpp::onRequest()` (Priority: High)
- [02-design-decisions.md §2.3](./02-design-decisions.md) — Span naming convention: `rpc.request`, `rpc.command.*`
- [02-design-decisions.md §2.4.2](./02-design-decisions.md) — RPC span attributes: `command`, `version`, `rpc_role`, `xrpl.rpc.params`
- [03-implementation-strategy.md §3.9.2](./03-implementation-strategy.md) — File impact: `ServerHandler.cpp` ~40 lines added, ~10 changed (Low risk)
---
## Task 7: Instrument RPC Command Execution
**Objective**: Add per-command tracing inside the RPC handler so each command (e.g., `submit`, `account_info`, `server_info`) gets its own child span.
**What to do**:
- Edit `src/xrpld/rpc/detail/RPCHandler.cpp`:
- `#include <xrpl/telemetry/SpanGuard.h>`
- In `doCommand(RPC::JsonContext& context, Json::Value& result)`:
- At the top: `auto span = telemetry::SpanGuard::rpcSpan("rpc.command." + context.method);`
- Set attributes:
- `span.setAttribute("command", context.method);`
- `span.setAttribute("version", static_cast<int64_t>(context.apiVersion));`
- `span.setAttribute("rpc_role", (context.role == Role::ADMIN) ? "admin" : "user");`
- On success: `span.setAttribute("rpc_status", "success");`
- On error: `span.setAttribute("rpc_status", "error");` and set the error message
- After this, traces in Tempo/Grafana should look like:
```
rpc.request (command=account_info)
└── rpc.process
└── rpc.command.account_info (version=2, rpc_role=user, rpc_status=success)
```
**Key modified file**:
- `src/xrpld/rpc/detail/RPCHandler.cpp` (~15-20 lines added)
**Reference**:
- [04-code-samples.md §4.5.3](./04-code-samples.md) — `ServerHandler::onRequest()` code sample (includes child span pattern for `rpc.command.*`)
- [02-design-decisions.md §2.3](./02-design-decisions.md) — Span naming: `rpc.command.*` pattern with dynamic command name (e.g., `rpc.command.server_info`)
- [02-design-decisions.md §2.4.2](./02-design-decisions.md) — RPC attribute schema: `command`, `version`, `rpc_role`, `rpc_status`
- [01-architecture-analysis.md §1.6](./01-architecture-analysis.md) — Key trace points table: `rpc.command.*` in `RPCHandler.cpp::doCommand()` (Priority: High)
- [02-design-decisions.md §2.6.5](./02-design-decisions.md) — Correlation with PerfLog: how `doCommand()` can link trace_id with existing PerfLog entries
- [03-implementation-strategy.md §3.4.4](./03-implementation-strategy.md) — RPC request overhead budget: ~1.75 μs total per request
---
## Task 8: Build, Run, and Verify End-to-End
> **OTLP** = OpenTelemetry Protocol
**Objective**: Prove the full pipeline works: xrpld emits traces -> OTel Collector receives them -> Tempo stores them for Grafana visualization.
**What to do**:
1. **Start the Docker stack**:
```bash
docker compose -f docker/telemetry/docker-compose.yml up -d
```
Verify Collector health: `curl http://localhost:13133`
2. **Build xrpld with telemetry**:
```bash
# Adjust for your actual build workflow
conan install . --build=missing -o with_telemetry=True
cmake --preset default -DXRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY=ON
cmake --build --preset default
```
3. **Configure xrpld**:
Add to `xrpld.cfg` (or your local test config):
```ini
[telemetry]
enabled=1
endpoint=localhost:4317
sampling_ratio=1.0
trace_rpc=1
```
4. **Start xrpld** in standalone mode:
```bash
./rippled --conf xrpld.cfg -a --start
```
5. **Generate RPC traffic**:
```bash
# server_info
curl -s -X POST http://localhost:5005 \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"method":"server_info","params":[{}]}'
# ledger
curl -s -X POST http://localhost:5005 \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"method":"ledger","params":[{"ledger_index":"current"}]}'
# account_info (will error in standalone, that's fine — we trace errors too)
curl -s -X POST http://localhost:5005 \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"method":"account_info","params":[{"account":"rHb9CJAWyB4rj91VRWn96DkukG4bwdtyTh"}]}'
```
6. **Verify in Grafana (Tempo)**:
- Open `http://localhost:3000`
- Navigate to Explore → select Tempo datasource
- Search for service `xrpld`
- Confirm you see traces with spans: `rpc.request` -> `rpc.process` -> `rpc.command.server_info`
- Click into a trace and verify attributes: `command`, `rpc_status`, `version`
7. **Verify zero-overhead when disabled**:
- Rebuild with `XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY=OFF`, or set `enabled=0` in config
- Run the same RPC calls
- Confirm no new traces appear and no errors in xrpld logs
**Verification Checklist**:
- [ ] Docker stack starts without errors
- [ ] xrpld builds with `-DXRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY=ON`
- [ ] xrpld starts and connects to OTel Collector (check xrpld logs for telemetry messages)
- [ ] Traces appear in Grafana/Tempo under service "xrpld"
- [ ] Span hierarchy is correct (parent-child relationships)
- [ ] Span attributes are populated (`command`, `rpc_status`, etc.)
- [ ] Error spans show error status and message
- [ ] Building with `XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY=OFF` produces no regressions
- [ ] Setting `enabled=0` at runtime produces no traces and no errors
**Reference**:
- [06-implementation-phases.md §6.11.1](./06-implementation-phases.md) — Phase 1 definition of done: SDK compiles, runtime toggle works, span creation verified in Tempo, config validation passes
- [06-implementation-phases.md §6.11.2](./06-implementation-phases.md#6112-phase-2-rpc-tracing) — Phase 2 definition of done: 100% RPC coverage, traceparent propagation, <1ms p99 overhead, dashboard deployed
- [06-implementation-phases.md §6.8](./06-implementation-phases.md) — Success metrics: trace coverage >95%, CPU overhead <3%, memory <5 MB, latency impact <2%
- [03-implementation-strategy.md §3.9.5](./03-implementation-strategy.md) — Backward compatibility: config optional, protocol unchanged, `XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY=OFF` produces identical binary
- [01-architecture-analysis.md §1.8](./01-architecture-analysis.md) — Observable outcomes: what traces, metrics, and dashboards to expect
---
## Task 9: Document POC Results and Next Steps
> **OTLP** = OpenTelemetry Protocol | **WS** = WebSocket
**Objective**: Capture findings, screenshots, and remaining work for the team.
**What to do**:
- Take screenshots of Grafana/Tempo showing:
- The service list with "xrpld"
- A trace with the full span tree
- Span detail view showing attributes
- Document any issues encountered (build issues, SDK quirks, missing attributes)
- Note performance observations (build time impact, any noticeable runtime overhead)
- Write a short summary of what the POC proves and what it doesn't cover yet:
- **Proves**: OTel SDK integrates with xrpld, OTLP export works, RPC traces visible
- **Doesn't cover**: Cross-node P2P context propagation, consensus tracing, protobuf trace context, W3C traceparent header extraction, tail-based sampling, production deployment
- Outline next steps (mapping to the full plan phases):
- [Phase 2](./06-implementation-phases.md) completion: [W3C header extraction](./02-design-decisions.md) (§2.5), WebSocket tracing, all [RPC handlers](./01-architecture-analysis.md) (§1.6)
- [Phase 3](./06-implementation-phases.md): [Protobuf `TraceContext` message](./04-code-samples.md) (§4.4), [transaction relay tracing](./04-code-samples.md) (§4.5.1) across nodes
- [Phase 4](./06-implementation-phases.md): [Consensus round and phase tracing](./04-code-samples.md) (§4.5.2)
- [Phase 5](./06-implementation-phases.md): [Production collector config](./05-configuration-reference.md) (§5.5.2), [Grafana dashboards](./07-observability-backends.md) (§7.6), [alerting](./07-observability-backends.md) (§7.6.3)
**Reference**:
- [06-implementation-phases.md §6.1](./06-implementation-phases.md) — Full 5-phase timeline overview and Gantt chart
- [06-implementation-phases.md §6.10](./06-implementation-phases.md) — Crawl-Walk-Run strategy: POC is the CRAWL phase, next steps are WALK and RUN
- [06-implementation-phases.md §6.12](./06-implementation-phases.md) — Recommended implementation order (14 steps across 9 weeks)
- [03-implementation-strategy.md §3.9](./03-implementation-strategy.md) — Code intrusiveness assessment and risk matrix for each remaining component
- [07-observability-backends.md §7.2](./07-observability-backends.md) — Production backend selection (Tempo, Elastic APM, Honeycomb, Datadog)
- [02-design-decisions.md §2.5](./02-design-decisions.md) — Context propagation design: W3C HTTP headers, protobuf P2P, JobQueue internal
- [00-tracing-fundamentals.md](./00-tracing-fundamentals.md) — Reference for team onboarding on distributed tracing concepts
---
## Summary
| Task | Description | New Files | Modified Files | Depends On |
| ---- | ------------------------------------ | --------- | -------------- | ---------- |
| 0 | Docker observability stack | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1 | OTel C++ SDK dependency | 0 | 2 | — |
| 2 | Core Telemetry interface + NullImpl | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| 3 | OTel-backed Telemetry implementation | 2 | 1 | 1, 2 |
| 4 | Application lifecycle integration | 0 | 3 | 2, 3 |
| 5 | SpanGuard factory methods | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| 6 | Instrument RPC ServerHandler | 0 | 1 | 4, 5 |
| 7 | Instrument RPC command execution | 0 | 1 | 4, 5 |
| 8 | End-to-end verification | 0 | 0 | 0-7 |
| 9 | Document results and next steps | 1 | 0 | 8 |
**Parallel work**: Tasks 0 and 1 can run in parallel. Tasks 2 and 5 have no dependency on each other. Tasks 6 and 7 can be done in parallel once Tasks 4 and 5 are complete.
---
## Next Steps (Post-POC)
> **OTLP** = OpenTelemetry Protocol | **WS** = WebSocket
### Metrics Pipeline for Grafana Dashboards
The current POC exports **traces only**. Grafana's Explore view can query Tempo for individual traces, but time-series charts (latency histograms, request throughput, error rates) require a **metrics pipeline**. To enable this:
1. **Add a `spanmetrics` connector** to the OTel Collector config that derives RED metrics (Rate, Errors, Duration) from trace spans automatically:
```yaml
connectors:
spanmetrics:
histogram:
explicit:
buckets: [1ms, 5ms, 10ms, 25ms, 50ms, 100ms, 250ms, 500ms, 1s, 5s]
dimensions:
- name: command
- name: rpc_status
exporters:
prometheus:
endpoint: 0.0.0.0:8889
service:
pipelines:
traces:
receivers: [otlp]
processors: [batch]
exporters: [debug, otlp/tempo, spanmetrics]
metrics:
receivers: [spanmetrics]
exporters: [prometheus]
```
2. **Add Prometheus** to the Docker Compose stack to scrape the collector's metrics endpoint.
3. **Add Prometheus as a Grafana datasource** and build dashboards for:
- RPC request latency (p50/p95/p99) by command
- RPC throughput (requests/sec) by command
- Error rate by command
- Span duration distribution
### Additional Instrumentation
- **W3C `traceparent` header extraction** in `ServerHandler` to support cross-service context propagation from external callers
- **WebSocket RPC tracing** in `ServerHandler::onWSMessage()`
- **Transaction relay tracing** across nodes using protobuf `TraceContext` messages
- **Consensus round and phase tracing** for validator coordination visibility
- **Ledger close tracing** to measure close-to-validated latency
### Production Hardening
- **Tail-based sampling** in the OTel Collector to reduce volume while retaining error/slow traces
- **TLS configuration** for the OTLP exporter in production deployments
- **Resource limits** on the batch processor queue to prevent unbounded memory growth
- **Health monitoring** for the telemetry pipeline itself (collector lag, export failures)
### POC Lessons Learned
Issues encountered during POC implementation that inform future work:
| Issue | Resolution | Impact on Future Work |
| -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------- |
| Conan lockfile rejected `opentelemetry-cpp/1.18.0` | Used `--lockfile=""` to bypass | Lockfile must be regenerated when adding new dependencies |
| Conan package only builds OTLP HTTP exporter, not gRPC | Switched from gRPC to HTTP exporter (`localhost:4318/v1/traces`) | HTTP exporter is the default; gRPC requires custom Conan profile |
| CMake target `opentelemetry-cpp::api` etc. don't exist in Conan package | Use umbrella target `opentelemetry-cpp::opentelemetry-cpp` | Conan targets differ from upstream CMake targets |
| OTel Collector `logging` exporter deprecated | Renamed to `debug` exporter | Use `debug` in all collector configs going forward |
| Macro parameter `telemetry` collided with `::xrpl::telemetry::` namespace | Replaced macros with SpanGuard factory methods (no macros needed) | Factory methods avoid macro hygiene issues entirely |
| `opentelemetry::trace::Scope` creates new context on move | Store scope as member, create once in constructor | SpanGuard move semantics need care with Scope lifecycle |
| `TracerProviderFactory::Create` returns `unique_ptr<sdk::TracerProvider>`, not `nostd::shared_ptr` | Use `std::shared_ptr` member, wrap in `nostd::shared_ptr` for global provider | OTel SDK factory return types don't match API provider types |

View File

@@ -1,206 +0,0 @@
# Phase 2: RPC Tracing Completion Task List
> **Goal**: Complete RPC tracing coverage with unit tests, Grafana search filters, PathFind instrumentation, and config hardening. Build on the Phase 1c SpanGuard factory foundation to achieve production-quality RPC observability.
>
> **Scope**: Unit tests for core telemetry, Grafana Tempo search filters, PathFind RPC tracing, config validation (`std::clamp`).
>
> **Branch**: `pratik/otel-phase2-rpc-tracing` (from `pratik/otel-phase1c-rpc-integration`)
### Related Plan Documents
| Document | Relevance |
| ------------------------------------------------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------------- |
| [04-code-samples.md](./04-code-samples.md) | TraceContextPropagator (§4.4.2), RPC instrumentation (§4.5.3) |
| [02-design-decisions.md](./02-design-decisions.md) | W3C Trace Context (§2.5), span attributes (§2.4.2) |
| [06-implementation-phases.md](./06-implementation-phases.md) | Phase 2 tasks (§6.3), definition of done (§6.11.2) |
---
## Task 2.1: W3C Trace Context HTTP Header Extraction
**Status**: DEFERRED → Phase 3
**Reason**: W3C context propagation (`traceparent`/`tracestate` headers) requires a consumer — in Phase 2, RPC spans are entirely local to the node. Phase 3 introduces cross-node transaction tracing via protobuf context propagation, which is the first use case for extracted trace context. Implementing it here without a consumer would be dead code.
**Implemented in**: `pratik/otel-phase3-tx-tracing``TraceContextPropagator.h/.cpp`
---
## Task 2.2: Per-Category Span Creation
**Status**: COMPLETE (superseded by Phase 1c design)
**Original plan**: Add `XRPL_TRACE_PEER` and `XRPL_TRACE_LEDGER` macros.
**Actual implementation**: Phase 1c replaced all tracing macros with the `SpanGuard::span(TraceCategory, prefix, name)` factory pattern. The `TraceCategory` enum (`Rpc`, `Transactions`, `Consensus`, `Peer`, `Ledger`) serves the same conditional-creation purpose without macros. No separate task needed — the factory already supports all categories.
---
## Task 2.3: Add shouldTraceLedger() to Telemetry Interface
**Objective**: The `Setup` struct has a `traceLedger` field but there's no corresponding virtual method. Add it for interface completeness.
**What to do**:
- Edit `include/xrpl/telemetry/Telemetry.h`:
- Add `virtual bool shouldTraceLedger() const = 0;`
- Update all implementations:
- `src/libxrpl/telemetry/Telemetry.cpp` (TelemetryImpl, NullTelemetryOtel)
- `src/libxrpl/telemetry/NullTelemetry.cpp` (NullTelemetry)
**Key modified files**:
- `include/xrpl/telemetry/Telemetry.h`
- `src/libxrpl/telemetry/Telemetry.cpp`
- `src/libxrpl/telemetry/NullTelemetry.cpp`
---
## Task 2.4: Unit Tests for Core Telemetry Infrastructure
**Status**: COMPLETE
**Objective**: Add unit tests for the core telemetry abstractions to validate correctness and catch regressions.
**Implemented**:
- `src/tests/libxrpl/telemetry/TelemetryConfig.cpp`:
- Test Setup defaults (all fields have correct initial values)
- Test `setupTelemetry` config parser (empty section, full section, edge cases)
- Test `samplingRatio` clamping (values outside 0.0-1.0)
- `src/tests/libxrpl/telemetry/SpanGuardFactory.cpp`:
- Test null guard methods are safe (setAttribute, setOk, setError, addEvent on null)
- Test category span returns null when telemetry disabled
- Test child/linked span null when no parent context
- Test move construction transfers ownership
- Test recordException safe on null guard
- Test discard() safe on null guard
- `src/tests/libxrpl/telemetry/main.cpp` — GTest runner
- `src/tests/libxrpl/CMakeLists.txt` — test target with optional OTel linking
---
## Task 2.5: Enhance RPC Span Attributes
**Status**: DEFERRED (low priority)
**Reason**: The high-value attributes (`command`, `version`, `role`, `status`) are already set by Phase 1c. The remaining HTTP transport-level attributes (`http.method`, `net.peer.ip`, `http.status_code`) provide limited additional insight since:
- `http.method` is always POST for JSON-RPC
- `net.peer.ip` is debug-level info available in logs
- `duration_ms` is redundant with span duration (OTel captures start/end time natively)
These can be added later if dashboard queries specifically need them. The node health attributes (Task 2.8) provide far more operational value and were prioritized instead.
---
## Task 2.6: Build Verification and Performance Baseline
**Objective**: Verify the build succeeds with and without telemetry, and establish a performance baseline.
**What to do**:
1. Build with `telemetry=ON` and verify no compilation errors
2. Build with `telemetry=OFF` and verify no regressions
3. Run existing unit tests to verify no breakage
4. Document any build issues in lessons.md
**Verification Checklist**:
- [ ] `conan install . --build=missing -o telemetry=True` succeeds
- [ ] `cmake --preset default -Dtelemetry=ON` configures correctly
- [ ] Build succeeds with telemetry ON
- [ ] Build succeeds with telemetry OFF
- [ ] Existing tests pass with telemetry ON
- [ ] Existing tests pass with telemetry OFF
---
## Task 2.8: RPC Span Attribute Enrichment — Node Health Context
**Status**: DROPPED.
Node health (`amendment_blocked`, `server_state`) is not part of the telemetry surface. Operators consume the same data via the existing `server_info` / `server_state` RPC commands, so duplicating it on traces adds storage and cardinality cost without new value. The OTel C++ SDK 1.18.0 also does not support runtime updates to the resource, ruling out resource-level emission of these dynamic-by-nature flags.
---
## Task 2.9: PathFind RPC Instrumentation
**Status**: COMPLETE
**Objective**: Trace the path_find and ripple_path_find RPC handlers to capture request latency and computation cost.
**Spans added**:
- `pathfind.request` — wraps `doPathFind()` and `doRipplePathFind()` RPC handlers
- `pathfind.compute` — wraps `PathRequest::doUpdate()` (`pathfind_fast` attr)
- `pathfind.update_all` — wraps `PathRequestManager::updateAll()` on ledger close (`pathfind_ledger_index`, `pathfind_num_requests` attrs; emitted only when active subscriptions exist)
- `pathfind.discover` — wraps the entire per-source-asset loop in `PathRequest::findPaths()` (`pathfind_search_level`, `pathfind_num_paths` attrs). One span per RPC call instead of N (one per source asset). Trade-off: per-asset breakdown is lost; storage and cardinality bounded.
**Attribute namespacing**: All pathfind attributes use the `pathfind_*` underscore form per the Phase 1c naming-spec rule 5.
**New file**: `src/xrpld/rpc/detail/PathFindSpanNames.h`
**Modified files**:
- `src/xrpld/rpc/handlers/orderbook/PathFind.cpp`
- `src/xrpld/rpc/handlers/orderbook/RipplePathFind.cpp`
- `src/xrpld/rpc/detail/PathRequest.cpp`
- `src/xrpld/rpc/detail/PathRequestManager.cpp`
- `src/xrpld/rpc/detail/Pathfinder.cpp`
---
## Task 2.10: RPC and PathFind Span Attribute Gap Fill
**Status**: COMPLETE
**Objective**: Wire up workflow-identifying attributes that enable filtering and grouping traces by request characteristics without drilling into child spans.
**Attributes added**:
| Span | Attribute | Type | Source |
| ------------------- | ---------------------------- | ------ | --------------------------------- |
| `rpc.http_request` | `request_payload_size` | int64 | `request.body().size()` |
| `rpc.process` | `is_batch` | bool | `method == "batch"` check |
| `rpc.process` | `batch_size` | int64 | `params.size()` (only when batch) |
| `rpc.ws_message` | `command` | string | `jv[command]` or `jv[method]` |
| `rpc.command.*` | `load_type` | string | `context.loadType.label()` |
| `pathfind.compute` | `pathfind_dest_amount` | string | `saDstAmount_.getFullText()` |
| `pathfind.compute` | `pathfind_dest_currency` | string | `to_string(saDstAmount_.asset())` |
| `pathfind.discover` | `pathfind_num_source_assets` | int64 | `sourceAssets.size()` |
**New attr keys**: `RpcSpanNames.h` (`isBatch`, `batchSize`, `loadType`), `PathFindSpanNames.h` (`destAmount`, `destCurrency`, `numSourceAssets`).
**Modified files**:
- `src/xrpld/rpc/detail/RpcSpanNames.h`
- `src/xrpld/rpc/detail/PathFindSpanNames.h`
- `src/xrpld/rpc/detail/ServerHandler.cpp`
- `src/xrpld/rpc/detail/RPCHandler.cpp`
- `src/xrpld/rpc/detail/PathRequest.cpp`
---
## Summary
| Task | Description | Status | Notes |
| ---- | ------------------------------------------- | ------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------- |
| 2.1 | W3C Trace Context header extraction | Deferred → Phase 3 | No consumer in Phase 2; needs cross-node tracing |
| 2.2 | Per-category span creation | Complete (Phase 1c) | Superseded by TraceCategory enum + SpanGuard |
| 2.3 | Add shouldTraceLedger() interface method | Complete (Phase 1c) | Delivered in Phase 1c base branch |
| 2.4 | Unit tests for core telemetry | Complete | TelemetryConfig + SpanGuardFactory tests |
| 2.5 | Enhanced RPC span attributes (HTTP-level) | Deferred | Low value; span duration covers timing natively |
| 2.6 | Build verification and performance baseline | Complete | Verified in CI on Phase 1c |
| 2.7 | Grafana Tempo search filters | Complete | rpc-command, rpc-status, rpc-role filters |
| 2.8 | RPC span attribute enrichment (node health) | Dropped | Available via `server_info`/`server_state` RPC |
| 2.9 | PathFind RPC instrumentation | Complete | request, compute, update_all, discover |
| 2.10 | RPC/PathFind span attribute gap fill | Complete | Batch detection, payload size, load cost, pathfind params |
**Delivered in this branch**: Tasks 2.4, 2.7, 2.9, 2.10.
**Deferred with rationale**: Tasks 2.1 (→Phase 3), 2.5 (low priority).
**Dropped**: Task 2.8 (node health not duplicated on traces).
**Superseded**: Task 2.2 (Phase 1c SpanGuard factory covers this).

View File

@@ -1,531 +0,0 @@
# Phase 3: Transaction Tracing Task List
> **Goal**: Trace the full transaction lifecycle from RPC submission through peer relay, including cross-node context propagation via Protocol Buffer extensions. This is the WALK phase that demonstrates true distributed tracing.
>
> **Scope**: Protocol Buffer `TraceContext` message, context serialization, PeerImp transaction instrumentation, NetworkOPs processing instrumentation, HashRouter visibility, and multi-node relay context propagation.
>
> **Branch**: `pratik/otel-phase3-tx-tracing` (from `pratik/otel-phase2-rpc-tracing`)
### Related Plan Documents
| Document | Relevance |
| ------------------------------------------------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
| [04-code-samples.md](./04-code-samples.md) | TraceContext protobuf (§4.4.1), PeerImp instrumentation (§4.5.1), context serialization (§4.4.2) |
| [01-architecture-analysis.md](./01-architecture-analysis.md) | Transaction flow (§1.3), key trace points (§1.6) |
| [06-implementation-phases.md](./06-implementation-phases.md) | Phase 3 tasks (§6.4), definition of done (§6.11.3) |
| [02-design-decisions.md](./02-design-decisions.md) | Context propagation design (§2.5), attribute schema (§2.4.3) |
---
## Task 3.1: Define TraceContext Protocol Buffer Message
**Objective**: Add trace context fields to the P2P protocol messages so trace IDs can propagate across nodes.
**What to do**:
- Edit `include/xrpl/proto/xrpl.proto` (or `src/xrpld/proto/ripple.proto`, wherever the proto is):
- Add `TraceContext` message definition:
```protobuf
message TraceContext {
bytes trace_id = 1; // 16-byte trace identifier
bytes span_id = 2; // 8-byte span identifier
uint32 trace_flags = 3; // bit 0 = sampled
string trace_state = 4; // W3C tracestate value
}
```
- Add `optional TraceContext trace_context = 1001;` to:
- `TMTransaction`
- `TMProposeSet` (for Phase 4 use)
- `TMValidation` (for Phase 4 use)
- Use high field numbers (1001+) to avoid conflicts with existing fields
- Regenerate protobuf C++ code
**Key modified files**:
- `include/xrpl/proto/xrpl.proto` (or equivalent)
**Reference**:
- [04-code-samples.md §4.4.1](./04-code-samples.md) — TraceContext message definition
- [02-design-decisions.md §2.5.2](./02-design-decisions.md) — Protocol buffer context propagation design
---
## Task 3.2: Implement Protobuf Context Serialization
**Objective**: Create utilities to serialize/deserialize OTel trace context to/from protobuf `TraceContext` messages.
**What to do**:
- Create `include/xrpl/telemetry/TraceContextPropagator.h` (extend from Phase 2 if exists, or add protobuf methods):
- Add protobuf-specific methods:
- `static Context extractFromProtobuf(protocol::TraceContext const& proto)` — reconstruct OTel context from protobuf fields
- `static void injectToProtobuf(Context const& ctx, protocol::TraceContext& proto)` — serialize current span context into protobuf fields
- Both methods guard behind `#ifdef XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY`
- Create/extend `src/libxrpl/telemetry/TraceContextPropagator.cpp`:
- Implement extraction: read trace_id (16 bytes), span_id (8 bytes), trace_flags from protobuf, construct `SpanContext`, wrap in `Context`
- Implement injection: get current span from context, serialize its TraceId, SpanId, and TraceFlags into protobuf fields
**Key new/modified files**:
- `include/xrpl/telemetry/TraceContextPropagator.h`
- `src/libxrpl/telemetry/TraceContextPropagator.cpp`
**Reference**:
- [04-code-samples.md §4.4.2](./04-code-samples.md) — Full extract/inject implementation
---
## Task 3.3: Instrument PeerImp Transaction Handling
**Objective**: Add trace spans to the peer-level transaction receive and relay path.
**What to do**:
- Edit `src/xrpld/overlay/detail/PeerImp.cpp`:
- In `onMessage(TMTransaction)` / `handleTransaction()`:
- Extract parent trace context from incoming `TMTransaction::trace_context` field (if present)
- Create `tx.receive` span as child of extracted context (or new root if none)
- Set attributes: `tx_hash`, `peer_id`, `tx_status`
- On HashRouter suppression (duplicate): set `suppressed=true`, add `tx.duplicate` event
- Wrap validation call with child span `tx.validate`
- Wrap relay with `tx.relay` span
- When relaying to peers:
- Inject current trace context into outgoing `TMTransaction::trace_context`
- Set `relay_count` attribute
- Use `SpanGuard::span(TraceCategory::Transactions, "tx", "receive")` factory
(Phase 1c replaced macros with the SpanGuard factory pattern)
**Key modified files**:
- `src/xrpld/overlay/detail/PeerImp.cpp`
**Reference**:
- [04-code-samples.md §4.5.1](./04-code-samples.md) — Full PeerImp instrumentation example
- [01-architecture-analysis.md §1.3](./01-architecture-analysis.md) — Transaction flow diagram
- [01-architecture-analysis.md §1.6](./01-architecture-analysis.md) — tx.receive trace point
---
## Task 3.4: Instrument NetworkOPs Transaction Processing
**Objective**: Trace the transaction processing pipeline in NetworkOPs, covering both sync and async paths.
**What to do**:
- Edit `src/xrpld/app/misc/NetworkOPs.cpp`:
- In `processTransaction()`:
- Create `tx.process` span
- Set attributes: `tx_hash`, `tx_type`, `local` (whether from RPC or peer)
- Record whether sync or async path is taken
- In `doTransactionAsync()`:
- Capture parent context before queuing
- Create `tx.queue` span with queue depth attribute
- Add event when transaction is dequeued for processing
- In `doTransactionSync()`:
- Create `tx.process_sync` span
- Record result (applied, queued, rejected)
**Key modified files**:
- `src/xrpld/app/misc/NetworkOPs.cpp`
**Reference**:
- [01-architecture-analysis.md §1.6](./01-architecture-analysis.md) — tx.validate and tx.process trace points
- [02-design-decisions.md §2.4.3](./02-design-decisions.md) — Transaction attribute schema
---
## Task 3.5: Instrument HashRouter for Dedup Visibility
**Objective**: Make transaction deduplication visible in traces by recording HashRouter decisions as span attributes/events.
**What to do**:
- Edit `src/xrpld/overlay/detail/PeerImp.cpp` (in handleTransaction):
- After calling `HashRouter::shouldProcess()` or `addSuppressionPeer()`:
- Record `suppressed` attribute (true/false)
- Record `tx_flags` showing current HashRouter state (SAVED, TRUSTED, etc.)
- Add `tx.first_seen` or `tx.duplicate` event
- This is NOT a modification to HashRouter itself — just recording its decisions as span attributes in the existing PeerImp instrumentation from Task 3.3.
**Key modified files**:
- `src/xrpld/overlay/detail/PeerImp.cpp` (same changes as 3.3, logically grouped)
---
## Task 3.6: Context Propagation in Transaction Relay
**Status**: COMPLETE
**Objective**: Ensure trace context flows correctly when transactions are relayed between peers, creating linked spans across nodes.
**What was done**:
- **TX send side**: `NetworkOPs::apply()` now injects the tx.process span's trace
context into the outgoing `TMTransaction` protobuf before relay, using
`telemetry::injectSpanContext()`. The receiving node's `txReceiveSpan()` (already
wired in PeerImp) extracts the parent span_id and creates the tx.receive span
as a child of the sender's tx.process span.
- **Proposal send/receive**: `RCLConsensus::Adaptor::propose()` injects the
current thread's active span context into the `TMProposeSet` protobuf via
`telemetry::injectToProtobuf()`. PeerImp creates a
`consensus.proposal.receive` span that extracts the sender's trace context
as parent (via `ConsensusReceiveTracing.h`).
- **Validation send/receive**: `RCLConsensus::Adaptor::validate()` injects
the current thread's active span context into the `TMValidation` protobuf.
PeerImp creates a `consensus.validation.receive` span that extracts the
sender's trace context as parent.
- **Edge cases**: Missing trace context (older peers) degrades gracefully to
standalone spans. Invalid/corrupted context is treated as absent. Trace
flags are propagated and respected.
**New infrastructure**:
- `SpanGuard::getTraceBytes()` — extracts raw trace_id/span_id/trace_flags
from a span without exposing OTel types. Safe to call from any thread.
- `PropagationHelpers.h` — `injectSpanContext(SpanGuard&, proto)` bridge
between SpanGuard and protobuf TraceContext.
- `TraceContextPropagator.h` — `injectToProtobuf(ctx, proto)` for
same-thread injection via OTel RuntimeContext (used in propose/validate).
- `ConsensusReceiveTracing.h` — `proposalReceiveSpan()` and
`validationReceiveSpan()` helper functions that create receive spans with
optional parent context extraction from incoming protobuf messages.
**Key modified files**:
- `src/xrpld/app/misc/NetworkOPs.cpp` — tx relay injection
- `src/xrpld/app/consensus/RCLConsensus.cpp` — proposal/validation send injection
- `src/xrpld/overlay/detail/PeerImp.cpp` — proposal/validation receive spans
- `include/xrpl/telemetry/SpanGuard.h` — `TraceBytes` struct, `getTraceBytes()`
- `src/libxrpl/telemetry/SpanGuard.cpp` — `getTraceBytes()` implementation
- `src/xrpld/telemetry/PropagationHelpers.h` — inject helpers (new file)
- `src/xrpld/telemetry/ConsensusReceiveTracing.h` — receive span helpers (new file)
**Reference**:
- [02-design-decisions.md §2.5](./02-design-decisions.md) — Context propagation design
- [04-code-samples.md §4.5.1](./04-code-samples.md) — Relay context injection pattern
---
## Task 3.7: Build Verification and Testing
**Objective**: Verify all Phase 3 changes compile and work correctly.
**What to do**:
1. Build with `telemetry=ON` — verify no compilation errors
2. Build with `telemetry=OFF` — verify no regressions
3. Run existing unit tests
4. Verify protobuf regeneration produces correct C++ code
5. Document any issues encountered
**Verification Checklist**:
- [ ] Protobuf changes generate valid C++
- [ ] Build succeeds with telemetry ON
- [ ] Build succeeds with telemetry OFF
- [ ] Existing tests pass
- [ ] No undefined symbols from new telemetry calls
---
## Task 3.8: Transaction Span Peer Version Attribute
> **Source**: [External Dashboard Parity](../docs/superpowers/specs/2026-03-30-external-dashboard-parity-design.md) — adds peer version context inspired by the community [xrpl-validator-dashboard](https://github.com/realgrapedrop/xrpl-validator-dashboard).
>
> **Upstream**: Phase 2 (RPC span infrastructure must exist).
> **Downstream**: Phase 10 (validation checks for this attribute).
**Objective**: Add the relaying peer's xrpld version to `tx.receive` spans so operators can correlate transaction issues with peer version mismatches during network upgrades.
**What to do**:
- Edit `src/xrpld/overlay/detail/PeerImp.cpp`:
- In the `tx.receive` span block (after existing `peer_id` setAttribute call):
- Add `peer_version` (string) — from `this->getVersion()`
- Only set if `getVersion()` returns a non-empty string (avoid empty-string attributes)
**New span attribute**:
| Attribute | Type | Source | Example |
| -------------- | ------ | -------------------- | --------------- |
| `peer_version` | string | `peer->getVersion()` | `"xrpld-2.4.0"` |
**Rationale**: Transaction relay is where version mismatches cause subtle serialization or validation bugs. Tracing "this tx came from a v2.3.0 peer" helps diagnose compatibility issues. The community dashboard tracks peer versions externally; this brings version awareness into the trace itself.
**Key modified files**:
- `src/xrpld/overlay/detail/PeerImp.cpp`
**Exit Criteria**:
- [ ] `tx.receive` spans carry `peer_version` attribute with a non-empty version string
- [ ] Attribute is omitted (not set to empty string) when `getVersion()` returns empty
- [ ] Attribute visible in Jaeger span detail view
---
## Task 3.9: Deterministic Transaction Trace ID
> **Upstream**: Task 3.2 (protobuf serialization), Task 3.3 (PeerImp span exists).
> **Downstream**: Phase 10 (workload validation can query by tx hash directly).
> **Pattern**: Mirrors the consensus deterministic trace ID in Phase 4a
> (`createDeterministicContext` in `RCLConsensus.cpp`), adapted for transactions.
**Objective**: Derive the trace_id for transaction spans deterministically from the
transaction hash so that all nodes handling the same transaction independently produce
spans under the same trace_id — regardless of whether protobuf context propagation
succeeds.
**Why**: The current approach creates spans with random trace_ids and relies entirely
on protobuf `TraceContext` propagation to link them. If any hop in the relay chain
drops the context (older peers, message corruption, mixed-version networks), the trace
splits and downstream spans become impossible to find. With deterministic trace_ids,
correlation is guaranteed because every node derives the same trace_id from the same
`txID`.
**Approach — deterministic trace_id + protobuf span_id propagation**:
1. Derive `trace_id = txHash[0:16]` (first 16 bytes of the 32-byte transaction hash).
2. Generate a random 8-byte `span_id` per node (each node's span is unique within
the shared trace).
3. Create the span under this deterministic context as parent.
4. **Additionally**, if protobuf `TraceContext` is present in the incoming
`TMTransaction` message, extract the sender's `span_id` and use it as the span's
parent — this preserves parent-child ordering in the trace tree.
5. If protobuf context is absent (older peer, first hop), the span still has the
correct deterministic `trace_id` — it appears as a sibling root in the same trace
rather than being lost.
This gives the best of both worlds: guaranteed cross-node correlation via deterministic
`trace_id`, plus parent-child relay ordering via protobuf `span_id` when available.
**What to do**:
- Create `createDeterministicTxContext(uint256 const& txHash)` utility function:
- Location: shared header or file-local in `PeerImp.cpp` and `NetworkOPs.cpp`
(or a shared telemetry utility if both need it).
- Pattern: identical to `createDeterministicContext(uint256 const& ledgerId)` in
`RCLConsensus.cpp` — take `txHash[0:16]` as trace_id, random span_id via
`default_prng()`, sampled flag set, `remote=false`.
- Guard behind `#ifdef XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY`.
```cpp
opentelemetry::context::Context
createDeterministicTxContext(uint256 const& txHash)
{
namespace trace = opentelemetry::trace;
// First 16 bytes of the 32-byte tx hash as trace ID.
trace::TraceId traceId(
opentelemetry::nostd::span<uint8_t const, 16>(txHash.data(), 16));
// Random span_id so each node's span is unique within the trace.
uint8_t spanIdBytes[8];
auto const rval = default_prng()();
std::memcpy(spanIdBytes, &rval, sizeof(spanIdBytes));
trace::SpanId spanId(
opentelemetry::nostd::span<uint8_t const, 8>(spanIdBytes, 8));
trace::SpanContext syntheticCtx(
traceId, spanId, trace::TraceFlags(1), /* remote = */ false);
return opentelemetry::context::Context{}.SetValue(
trace::kSpanKey,
opentelemetry::nostd::shared_ptr<trace::Span>(
new trace::DefaultSpan(syntheticCtx)));
}
```
- Edit `src/xrpld/overlay/detail/PeerImp.cpp` — restructure `handleTransaction()`:
- **Move span creation after deserialization** (txID must be known first):
1. Deserialize `STTx` and get `txID` (existing code at line ~1382).
2. Create deterministic parent context: `auto detCtx = createDeterministicTxContext(txID)`.
3. If `m->has_trace_context()`: extract protobuf context via `extractFromProtobuf()`,
**combine** with deterministic trace_id — use the protobuf span_id as parent
to preserve relay ordering, but override trace_id with the deterministic one.
4. If no protobuf context: create span under `detCtx` directly.
5. Set all existing attributes (`hash`, `peerId`, `peerVersion`, `suppressed`, etc.).
- **Combining deterministic trace_id with protobuf parent span_id**:
When both are available, construct a synthetic `SpanContext` with:
- `trace_id` = `txHash[0:16]` (deterministic)
- `span_id` = extracted from protobuf (sender's span_id → becomes parent)
- `trace_flags` = from protobuf
- `remote` = true (came from another node)
```cpp
// Pseudo-code for the combined context:
auto detTraceId = trace::TraceId(txHash.data(), 16);
auto remoteSpanId = /* from extractFromProtobuf */;
auto remoteFlags = /* from extractFromProtobuf */;
trace::SpanContext combinedCtx(
detTraceId, remoteSpanId, remoteFlags, /* remote = */ true);
// Use as parent context for the new span.
```
- Edit `src/xrpld/app/misc/NetworkOPs.cpp` — update `processTransaction()`:
- `transaction->getID()` is already available at the top of the function.
- Create deterministic parent context from `txID`.
- Create `tx.process` span under this context.
- No protobuf context to extract here (NetworkOPs is intra-node), so
deterministic context alone is sufficient.
- Add `trace_strategy` attribute to spans:
- Add `inline constexpr auto traceStrategy = "trace_strategy";`
to `TxSpanNames.h`.
- Set on each tx span: `span.setAttribute(tx_span::attr::traceStrategy, "deterministic")`.
**Key new/modified files**:
- `src/xrpld/overlay/detail/PeerImp.cpp` — restructured span creation
- `src/xrpld/app/misc/NetworkOPs.cpp` — deterministic context for tx.process
- `src/xrpld/app/misc/TxSpanNames.h` — new `traceStrategy` attribute constant
- New or shared utility for `createDeterministicTxContext()` (location TBD: could be
a shared header like `include/xrpl/telemetry/DeterministicContext.h`, or file-local
if only used in two places)
**Interaction with existing tasks**:
- **Task 3.3 (PeerImp instrumentation)**: The span creation in `handleTransaction()`
must be restructured — the span currently starts before `txID` is known. This task
moves it after deserialization.
- **Task 3.6 (Relay context propagation)**: Protobuf injection at the relay site
remains the same — `injectToProtobuf()` serializes the current span's `span_id`.
The receiver extracts it and combines with the deterministic `trace_id`.
- **Phase 4a (Consensus deterministic trace ID)**: This task follows the same pattern.
Consider extracting a shared utility (e.g., `createDeterministicContext(uint256)`)
that both consensus and transaction tracing use.
**Exit Criteria**:
- [ ] `tx.receive` and `tx.process` spans have deterministic trace_id = `txHash[0:16]`
- [ ] All nodes handling the same transaction produce spans under the same trace_id
- [x] Protobuf `span_id` propagation still works when available (parent-child ordering)
- [ ] Missing protobuf context (old peer) degrades gracefully to sibling spans, not lost traces
- [ ] `trace_strategy` attribute set to `"deterministic"` on all tx spans
- [ ] Trace queryable by tx hash (truncate hash → trace_id → direct lookup in Tempo)
**Deliverables implemented (not in original plan)**:
- **`SpanGuard::txSpan()` factory method** (`include/xrpl/telemetry/SpanGuard.h`):
Two overloads for creating transaction spans with deterministic trace IDs:
- `txSpan(category, group, name, txHash)` — standalone span (deterministic
trace_id from `txHash[0:16]`, no parent span_id).
- `txSpan(category, group, name, txHash, parentCtx)` — child span (deterministic
trace_id combined with protobuf-extracted parent span_id for relay ordering).
- **`TxTracing.h` helper functions** (`src/xrpld/overlay/detail/TxTracing.h`):
File-local helpers that wrap `SpanGuard::txSpan()` for the two main PeerImp call
sites:
- `txReceiveSpan(txHash, parentCtx)` — creates `tx.receive` span with
deterministic trace_id and optional protobuf parent context.
- `txProcessSpan(txHash)` — creates `tx.process` span with deterministic
trace_id only (no protobuf parent, used intra-node).
- **Note**: `TxTracing.h` includes `xrpl.pb.h` unconditionally (outside
`#ifdef XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY`) because `protocol::TMTransaction` appears in
the function signatures regardless of telemetry build mode.
---
## Task 3.10: TxQ Instrumentation
**Status**: COMPLETE
**Objective**: Trace the transaction queue lifecycle — enqueue decisions, direct apply, batch clear, ledger-close accept loop, per-tx apply, and cleanup.
**Spans added**:
- `txq.enqueue` — wraps `TxQ::apply()` with tx_hash attribute
- `txq.apply_direct` — wraps `TxQ::tryDirectApply()` fast-path
- `txq.batch_clear` — wraps `TxQ::tryClearAccountQueueUpThruTx()`
- `txq.accept` — wraps `TxQ::accept()` ledger-close dequeue with queue_size attr
- `txq.accept_tx` — per-tx span inside accept loop with tx_hash, ter_code,
retries_remaining attributes
- `txq.cleanup` — wraps `TxQ::processClosedLedger()` with ledger_seq attribute
**New file**: `src/xrpld/app/misc/detail/TxQSpanNames.h`
**Modified file**: `src/xrpld/app/misc/detail/TxQ.cpp`
---
## Task 3.11: TX and TxQ Span Attribute Gap Fill
**Status**: COMPLETE
**Objective**: Add workflow-identifying attributes to transaction spans so operators can filter by transaction type and see outcomes without off-chain correlation.
**Attributes added**:
| Span | Attribute | Type | Source |
| ----------------- | -------------------- | ------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| `tx.process` | `tx_type` | string | `TxFormats::getInstance().findByType(stx->getTxnType())->getName()` |
| `tx.process` | `fee` | int64 | `stx->getFieldAmount(sfFee).xrp().drops()` |
| `tx.process` | `sequence` | int64 | `stx->getSeqProxy().value()` |
| `tx.process` | `ter_result` | string | `transToken(e.result)` (set after batch application) |
| `tx.process` | `applied` | bool | `e.applied` (set after batch application) |
| `tx.receive` | `tx_type` | string | `TxFormats::getInstance().findByType(stx->getTxnType())->getName()` |
| `txq.enqueue` | `tx_type` | string | same pattern as above |
| `txq.enqueue` | `txq_status` | string | `queued` / `applied_direct` / `applied` / `rejected` |
| `txq.enqueue` | `fee_level_paid` | int64 | `getFeeLevelPaid(view, *tx).value()` |
| `txq.enqueue` | `required_fee_level` | int64 | `getRequiredFeeLevel(...).value()` |
| `txq.batch_clear` | `num_cleared` | int64 | queued txs cleared ahead of the applying tx |
| `txq.cleanup` | `expired_count` | int64 | entries dropped for passed `LastLedgerSequence` |
| `txq.accept.tx` | `txq_status` | string | `applied` / `failed` / `retried` |
| `txq.accept` | `ledger_changed` | bool | set at end of accept loop |
**New attr keys**: `TxSpanNames.h` (`txType`, `fee`, `sequence`, `terResult`, `applied`), `TxQSpanNames.h` (`txType`).
**Modified files**:
- `src/xrpld/app/misc/TxSpanNames.h`
- `src/xrpld/app/misc/detail/TxQSpanNames.h`
- `src/xrpld/app/misc/NetworkOPs.cpp`
- `src/xrpld/overlay/detail/PeerImp.cpp`
- `src/xrpld/app/misc/detail/TxQ.cpp`
---
## Summary
| Task | Description | New Files | Modified Files | Depends On |
| ---- | ----------------------------------- | --------- | -------------- | ---------- |
| 3.1 | TraceContext protobuf message | 0 | 1 | Phase 2 |
| 3.2 | Protobuf context serialization | 1-2 | 0 | 3.1 |
| 3.3 | PeerImp transaction instrumentation | 0 | 1 | 3.2 |
| 3.4 | NetworkOPs transaction processing | 0 | 1 | Phase 2 |
| 3.5 | HashRouter dedup visibility | 0 | 1 | 3.3 |
| 3.6 | Relay context propagation | 0 | 1-2 | 3.3, 3.5 |
| 3.7 | Build verification and testing | 0 | 0 | 3.1-3.6 |
| 3.8 | TX span peer version attribute | 0 | 1 | 3.3 |
| 3.9 | Deterministic transaction trace ID | 0-1 | 3 | 3.2, 3.3 |
| 3.10 | TxQ instrumentation (6 spans) | 1 | 1 | 3.4 |
| 3.11 | TX/TxQ span attribute gap fill | 0 | 5 | 3.3, 3.10 |
**Parallel work**: Tasks 3.1 and 3.4 can start in parallel. Task 3.2 depends on 3.1. Tasks 3.3 and 3.5 depend on 3.2. Task 3.6 depends on 3.3 and 3.5. Task 3.8 depends on 3.3 (span must exist). Task 3.9 depends on 3.2 and 3.3. Task 3.10 depends on 3.4 (tx.process span must exist).
**Exit Criteria** (from [06-implementation-phases.md §6.11.3](./06-implementation-phases.md)):
- [x] Transaction traces span across nodes
- [x] Trace context in Protocol Buffer messages
- [ ] HashRouter deduplication visible in traces
- [ ] <5% overhead on transaction throughput
- [x] Deterministic trace_id: same trace_id for same tx across all nodes
- [x] Protobuf span_id propagation preserves parent-child ordering when available

View File

@@ -1,221 +0,0 @@
# Phase 4: Consensus Tracing Task List
> **Goal**: Full observability into consensus rounds — track round lifecycle, phase transitions, proposal handling, and validation. This is the RUN phase that completes the distributed tracing story.
>
> **Scope**: RCLConsensus instrumentation for round starts, phase transitions (open/establish/accept), proposal send/receive, validation handling, and correlation with transaction traces from Phase 3.
>
> **Branch**: `pratik/otel-phase4-consensus-tracing` (from `pratik/otel-phase3-tx-tracing`)
### Related Plan Documents
| Document | Relevance |
| ------------------------------------------------------------ | ----------------------------------------------------------- |
| [04-code-samples.md](./04-code-samples.md) | Consensus instrumentation (§4.5.2), consensus span patterns |
| [01-architecture-analysis.md](./01-architecture-analysis.md) | Consensus round flow (§1.4), key trace points (§1.6) |
| [06-implementation-phases.md](./06-implementation-phases.md) | Phase 4 tasks (§6.5), definition of done (§6.11.4) |
| [02-design-decisions.md](./02-design-decisions.md) | Consensus attribute schema (§2.4.4) |
---
## Task 4.1: Instrument Consensus Round Start
**Objective**: Create a root span for each consensus round that captures the round's key parameters.
**What to do**:
- Edit `src/xrpld/app/consensus/RCLConsensus.cpp`:
- In `RCLConsensus::startRound()` (or the Adaptor's startRound):
- Create `consensus.round` span using `SpanGuard::span(TraceCategory::Consensus, ...)`
- Set attributes:
- `xrpl.consensus.ledger.prev` — previous ledger hash
- `xrpl.consensus.ledger.seq` — target ledger sequence
- `xrpl.consensus.proposers` — number of trusted proposers
- `xrpl.consensus.mode` — "proposing" or "observing"
- Store the span context for use by child spans in phase transitions
- Add a member to hold current round trace context:
- `opentelemetry::context::Context currentRoundContext_` (guarded by `#ifdef`)
- Updated at round start, used by phase transition spans
**Key modified files**:
- `src/xrpld/app/consensus/RCLConsensus.cpp`
- `src/xrpld/app/consensus/RCLConsensus.h` (add context member)
**Reference**:
- [04-code-samples.md §4.5.2](./04-code-samples.md) — startRound instrumentation example
- [01-architecture-analysis.md §1.4](./01-architecture-analysis.md) — Consensus round flow
---
## Task 4.2: Instrument Phase Transitions
**Objective**: Create child spans for each consensus phase (open, establish, accept) to show timing breakdown.
**What to do**:
- Edit `src/xrpld/app/consensus/RCLConsensus.cpp`:
- Identify where phase transitions occur (the `Consensus<Adaptor>` template drives this)
- For each phase entry:
- Create span as child of `currentRoundContext_`: `consensus.phase.open`, `consensus.phase.establish`, `consensus.phase.accept`
- Set `xrpl.consensus.phase` attribute
- Add `phase.enter` event at start, `phase.exit` event at end
- Record phase duration in milliseconds
- In the `onClose` adaptor method:
- Create `consensus.ledger_close` span
- Set attributes: close_time, mode, transaction count in initial position
- Note: The Consensus template class in `include/xrpl/consensus/Consensus.h` drives phase transitions — check if instrumentation goes there or in the Adaptor
**Key modified files**:
- `src/xrpld/app/consensus/RCLConsensus.cpp`
- Possibly `include/xrpl/consensus/Consensus.h` (for template-level phase tracking)
**Reference**:
- [04-code-samples.md §4.5.2](./04-code-samples.md) — phaseTransition instrumentation
---
## Task 4.3: Instrument Proposal Handling
**Objective**: Trace proposal send and receive to show validator coordination.
**What to do**:
- Edit `src/xrpld/app/consensus/RCLConsensus.cpp`:
- In `Adaptor::propose()`:
- Create `consensus.proposal.send` span
- Set attributes: `xrpl.consensus.round` (proposal sequence), proposal hash
- Inject trace context into outgoing `TMProposeSet::trace_context` (from Phase 3 protobuf)
- In `Adaptor::peerProposal()` (or wherever peer proposals are received):
- Extract trace context from incoming `TMProposeSet::trace_context`
- Create `consensus.proposal.receive` span as child of extracted context
- Set attributes: `xrpl.consensus.proposer` (node ID), `xrpl.consensus.round`
- In `Adaptor::share(RCLCxPeerPos)`:
- Create `consensus.proposal.relay` span for relaying peer proposals
**Key modified files**:
- `src/xrpld/app/consensus/RCLConsensus.cpp`
**Reference**:
- [04-code-samples.md §4.5.2](./04-code-samples.md) — peerProposal instrumentation
- [02-design-decisions.md §2.4.4](./02-design-decisions.md) — Consensus attribute schema
---
## Task 4.4: Instrument Validation Handling
**Objective**: Trace validation send and receive to show ledger validation flow.
**What to do**:
- Edit `src/xrpld/app/consensus/RCLConsensus.cpp` (or the validation handler):
- When sending our validation:
- Create `consensus.validation.send` span
- Set attributes: validated ledger hash, sequence, signing time
- When receiving a peer validation:
- Extract trace context from `TMValidation::trace_context` (if present)
- Create `consensus.validation.receive` span
- Set attributes: `xrpl.consensus.validator` (node ID), ledger hash
**Key modified files**:
- `src/xrpld/app/consensus/RCLConsensus.cpp`
- `src/xrpld/app/misc/NetworkOPs.cpp` (if validation handling is here)
---
## Task 4.5: Add Consensus-Specific Attributes
**Objective**: Enrich consensus spans with detailed attributes for debugging and analysis.
**What to do**:
- Review all consensus spans and ensure they include:
- `xrpl.consensus.ledger.seq` — target ledger sequence number
- `xrpl.consensus.round` — consensus round number
- `xrpl.consensus.mode` — proposing/observing/wrongLedger
- `xrpl.consensus.phase` — current phase name
- `xrpl.consensus.phase_duration_ms` — time spent in phase
- `xrpl.consensus.proposers` — number of trusted proposers
- `xrpl.consensus.tx_count` — transactions in proposed set
- `xrpl.consensus.disputes` — number of disputed transactions
- `xrpl.consensus.converge_percent` — convergence percentage
**Key modified files**:
- `src/xrpld/app/consensus/RCLConsensus.cpp`
---
## Task 4.6: Correlate Transaction and Consensus Traces
**Objective**: Link transaction traces from Phase 3 with consensus traces so you can follow a transaction from submission through consensus into the ledger.
**What to do**:
- In `onClose()` or `onAccept()`:
- When building the consensus position, link the round span to individual transaction spans using span links (if OTel SDK supports it) or events
- At minimum, record the transaction hashes included in the consensus set as span events: `tx.included` with `xrpl.tx.hash` attribute
- In `processTransactionSet()` (NetworkOPs):
- If the consensus round span context is available, create child spans for each transaction applied to the ledger
**Key modified files**:
- `src/xrpld/app/consensus/RCLConsensus.cpp`
- `src/xrpld/app/misc/NetworkOPs.cpp`
---
## Task 4.7: Build Verification and Testing
**Objective**: Verify all Phase 4 changes compile and don't affect consensus timing.
**What to do**:
1. Build with `telemetry=ON` — verify no compilation errors
2. Build with `telemetry=OFF` — verify no regressions (critical for consensus code)
3. Run existing consensus-related unit tests
4. Verify that all macros expand to no-ops when disabled
5. Check that no consensus-critical code paths are affected by instrumentation overhead
**Verification Checklist**:
- [ ] Build succeeds with telemetry ON
- [ ] Build succeeds with telemetry OFF
- [ ] Existing consensus tests pass
- [ ] No new includes in consensus headers when telemetry is OFF
- [ ] Phase timing instrumentation doesn't use blocking operations
---
## Summary
| Task | Description | New Files | Modified Files | Depends On |
| ---- | ------------------------------------- | --------- | -------------- | ------------- |
| 4.1 | Consensus round start instrumentation | 0 | 2 | Phase 3 |
| 4.2 | Phase transition instrumentation | 0 | 1-2 | 4.1 |
| 4.3 | Proposal handling instrumentation | 0 | 1 | 4.1 |
| 4.4 | Validation handling instrumentation | 0 | 1-2 | 4.1 |
| 4.5 | Consensus-specific attributes | 0 | 1 | 4.2, 4.3, 4.4 |
| 4.6 | Transaction-consensus correlation | 0 | 2 | 4.2, Phase 3 |
| 4.7 | Build verification and testing | 0 | 0 | 4.1-4.6 |
**Parallel work**: Tasks 4.2, 4.3, and 4.4 can run in parallel after 4.1 is complete. Task 4.5 depends on all three. Task 4.6 depends on 4.2 and Phase 3.
**Exit Criteria** (from [06-implementation-phases.md §6.11.4](./06-implementation-phases.md)):
- [ ] Complete consensus round traces
- [ ] Phase transitions visible
- [ ] Proposals and validations traced
- [ ] No impact on consensus timing

View File

@@ -1,241 +0,0 @@
# Phase 5: Documentation & Deployment Task List
> **Goal**: Production readiness — Grafana dashboards, spanmetrics pipeline, operator runbook, alert definitions, and final integration testing. This phase ensures the telemetry system is useful and maintainable in production.
>
> **Scope**: Grafana dashboard definitions, OTel Collector spanmetrics connector, Prometheus integration, alert rules, operator documentation, and production-ready Docker Compose stack.
>
> **Branch**: `pratik/otel-phase5-docs-deployment` (from `pratik/otel-phase4-consensus-tracing`)
### Related Plan Documents
| Document | Relevance |
| ---------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| [07-observability-backends.md](./07-observability-backends.md) | Tempo setup (§7.1), Grafana dashboards (§7.6), alerts (§7.6.3) |
| [05-configuration-reference.md](./05-configuration-reference.md) | Collector config (§5.5), production config (§5.5.2), Docker Compose (§5.6) |
| [06-implementation-phases.md](./06-implementation-phases.md) | Phase 5 tasks (§6.6), definition of done (§6.11.5) |
---
## Task 5.1: Add Spanmetrics Connector to OTel Collector
**Objective**: Derive RED metrics (Rate, Errors, Duration) from trace spans automatically, enabling Grafana time-series dashboards.
**What to do**:
- Edit `docker/telemetry/otel-collector-config.yaml`:
- Add `spanmetrics` connector:
```yaml
connectors:
spanmetrics:
histogram:
explicit:
buckets: [1ms, 5ms, 10ms, 25ms, 50ms, 100ms, 250ms, 500ms, 1s, 5s]
dimensions:
- name: xrpl.rpc.command
- name: xrpl.rpc.status
- name: xrpl.consensus.phase
- name: xrpl.tx.type
```
- Add `prometheus` exporter:
```yaml
exporters:
prometheus:
endpoint: 0.0.0.0:8889
```
- Wire the pipeline:
```yaml
service:
pipelines:
traces:
receivers: [otlp]
processors: [batch]
exporters: [debug, otlp/tempo, spanmetrics]
metrics:
receivers: [spanmetrics]
exporters: [prometheus]
```
- Edit `docker/telemetry/docker-compose.yml`:
- Expose port `8889` on the collector for Prometheus scraping
- Add Prometheus service
- Add Prometheus as Grafana datasource
**Key modified files**:
- `docker/telemetry/otel-collector-config.yaml`
- `docker/telemetry/docker-compose.yml`
**Key new files**:
- `docker/telemetry/prometheus.yml` (Prometheus scrape config)
- `docker/telemetry/grafana/provisioning/datasources/prometheus.yaml`
**Reference**:
- [POC_taskList.md §Next Steps](./POC_taskList.md) — Metrics pipeline for Grafana dashboards
---
## Task 5.2: Create Grafana Dashboards
**Objective**: Provide pre-built Grafana dashboards for RPC performance, transaction lifecycle, and consensus health.
**What to do**:
- Create `docker/telemetry/grafana/provisioning/dashboards/dashboards.yaml` (provisioning config)
- Create dashboard JSON files:
1. **RPC Performance Dashboard** (`rpc-performance.json`):
- RPC request latency (p50/p95/p99) by command — histogram panel
- RPC throughput (requests/sec) by command — time series
- RPC error rate by command — bar gauge
- Top slowest RPC commands — table
2. **Transaction Overview Dashboard** (`transaction-overview.json`):
- Transaction processing rate — time series
- Transaction latency distribution — histogram
- Suppression rate (duplicates) — stat panel
- Transaction processing path (sync vs async) — pie chart
3. **Consensus Health Dashboard** (`consensus-health.json`):
- Consensus round duration — time series
- Phase duration breakdown (open/establish/accept) — stacked bar
- Proposals sent/received per round — stat panel
- Consensus mode distribution (proposing/observing) — pie chart
- Store dashboards in `docker/telemetry/grafana/dashboards/`
**Key new files**:
- `docker/telemetry/grafana/provisioning/dashboards/dashboards.yaml`
- `docker/telemetry/grafana/dashboards/rpc-performance.json`
- `docker/telemetry/grafana/dashboards/transaction-overview.json`
- `docker/telemetry/grafana/dashboards/consensus-health.json`
**Reference**:
- [07-observability-backends.md §7.6](./07-observability-backends.md) — Grafana dashboard specifications
- [01-architecture-analysis.md §1.8.3](./01-architecture-analysis.md) — Dashboard panel examples
---
## Task 5.3: Define Alert Rules
**Objective**: Create alert definitions for key telemetry anomalies.
**What to do**:
- Create `docker/telemetry/grafana/provisioning/alerting/alerts.yaml`:
- **RPC Latency Alert**: p99 latency > 1s for any command over 5 minutes
- **RPC Error Rate Alert**: Error rate > 5% for any command over 5 minutes
- **Consensus Duration Alert**: Round duration > 10s (warn), > 30s (critical)
- **Transaction Processing Alert**: Processing rate drops below threshold
- **Telemetry Pipeline Health**: No spans received for > 2 minutes
**Key new files**:
- `docker/telemetry/grafana/provisioning/alerting/alerts.yaml`
**Reference**:
- [07-observability-backends.md §7.6.3](./07-observability-backends.md) — Alert rule definitions
---
## Task 5.4: Production Collector Configuration
**Objective**: Create a production-ready OTel Collector configuration with tail-based sampling and resource limits.
**What to do**:
- Create `docker/telemetry/otel-collector-config-production.yaml`:
- Tail-based sampling policy:
- Always sample errors and slow traces
- 10% base sampling rate for normal traces
- Always sample first trace for each unique RPC command
- Resource limits:
- Memory limiter processor (80% of available memory)
- Queued retry for export failures
- TLS configuration for production endpoints
- Health check endpoint
**Key new files**:
- `docker/telemetry/otel-collector-config-production.yaml`
**Reference**:
- [05-configuration-reference.md §5.5.2](./05-configuration-reference.md) — Production collector config
---
## Task 5.5: Operator Runbook
**Objective**: Create operator documentation for managing the telemetry system in production.
**What to do**:
- Create `docs/telemetry-runbook.md`:
- **Setup**: How to enable telemetry in xrpld
- **Configuration**: All config options with descriptions
- **Collector Deployment**: Docker Compose vs. Kubernetes vs. bare metal
- **Troubleshooting**: Common issues and resolutions
- No traces appearing
- High memory usage from telemetry
- Collector connection failures
- Sampling configuration tuning
- **Performance Tuning**: Batch size, queue size, sampling ratio guidelines
- **Upgrading**: How to upgrade OTel SDK and Collector versions
**Key new files**:
- `docs/telemetry-runbook.md`
---
## Task 5.6: Final Integration Testing
**Objective**: Validate the complete telemetry stack end-to-end.
**What to do**:
1. Start full Docker stack (Collector, Tempo, Grafana, Prometheus)
2. Build xrpld with `telemetry=ON`
3. Run in standalone mode with telemetry enabled
4. Generate RPC traffic and verify traces in Tempo
5. Verify dashboards populate in Grafana
6. Verify alerts trigger correctly
7. Test telemetry OFF path (no regressions)
8. Run full test suite
**Verification Checklist**:
- [ ] Docker stack starts without errors
- [ ] Traces appear in Tempo with correct hierarchy
- [ ] Grafana dashboards show metrics derived from spans
- [ ] Prometheus scrapes spanmetrics successfully
- [ ] Alerts can be triggered by simulated conditions
- [ ] Build succeeds with telemetry ON and OFF
- [ ] Full test suite passes
---
## Summary
| Task | Description | New Files | Modified Files | Depends On |
| ---- | ---------------------------------- | --------- | -------------- | ---------- |
| 5.1 | Spanmetrics connector + Prometheus | 2 | 2 | Phase 4 |
| 5.2 | Grafana dashboards | 4 | 0 | 5.1 |
| 5.3 | Alert definitions | 1 | 0 | 5.1 |
| 5.4 | Production collector config | 1 | 0 | Phase 4 |
| 5.5 | Operator runbook | 1 | 0 | Phase 4 |
| 5.6 | Final integration testing | 0 | 0 | 5.1-5.5 |
**Parallel work**: Tasks 5.1, 5.4, and 5.5 can run in parallel. Tasks 5.2 and 5.3 depend on 5.1. Task 5.6 depends on all others.
**Exit Criteria** (from [06-implementation-phases.md §6.11.5](./06-implementation-phases.md)):
- [ ] Dashboards deployed and showing data
- [ ] Alerts configured and tested
- [ ] Operator documentation complete
- [ ] Production collector config ready
- [ ] Full test suite passes

View File

@@ -1,673 +0,0 @@
# OpenTelemetry Distributed Tracing for xrpld
---
## Slide 1: Introduction
> **CNCF** = Cloud Native Computing Foundation
### What is OpenTelemetry?
OpenTelemetry is an open-source, CNCF-backed observability framework for distributed tracing, metrics, and logs.
### Why OpenTelemetry for xrpld?
- **End-to-End Transaction Visibility**: Track transactions from submission → consensus → ledger inclusion
- **Cross-Node Correlation**: Follow requests across multiple independent nodes using a unique `trace_id`
- **Consensus Round Analysis**: Understand timing and behavior across validators
- **Incident Debugging**: Correlate events across distributed nodes during issues
```mermaid
flowchart LR
A["Node A<br/>tx.receive<br/>trace_id: abc123"] --> B["Node B<br/>tx.relay<br/>trace_id: abc123"] --> C["Node C<br/>tx.validate<br/>trace_id: abc123"] --> D["Node D<br/>ledger.apply<br/>trace_id: abc123"]
style A fill:#1565c0,stroke:#0d47a1,color:#fff
style B fill:#2e7d32,stroke:#1b5e20,color:#fff
style C fill:#2e7d32,stroke:#1b5e20,color:#fff
style D fill:#e65100,stroke:#bf360c,color:#fff
```
**Reading the diagram:**
- **Node A (blue, leftmost)**: The originating node that first receives the transaction and assigns a new `trace_id: abc123`; this ID becomes the correlation key for the entire distributed trace.
- **Node B and Node C (green, middle)**: Relay and validation nodes — each creates its own span but carries the same `trace_id`, so their work is linked to the original submission without any central coordinator.
- **Node D (orange, rightmost)**: The final node that applies the transaction to the ledger; the trace now spans the full lifecycle from submission to ledger inclusion.
- **Left-to-right flow**: The horizontal progression shows the real-world message path — a transaction hops from node to node, and the shared `trace_id` stitches all hops into a single queryable trace.
> **Trace ID: abc123** — All nodes share the same trace, enabling cross-node correlation.
---
## Slide 2: OpenTelemetry vs Open Source Alternatives
> **CNCF** = Cloud Native Computing Foundation
| Feature | OpenTelemetry | Jaeger | Zipkin | SkyWalking | Pinpoint | Prometheus |
| ------------------- | ---------------- | ---------------- | ------------------ | ---------- | ---------- | ---------- |
| **Tracing** | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | NO |
| **Metrics** | YES | NO | NO | YES | YES | YES |
| **Logs** | YES | NO | NO | YES | NO | NO |
| **C++ SDK** | YES Official | YES (Deprecated) | YES (Unmaintained) | NO | NO | YES |
| **Vendor Neutral** | YES Primary goal | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO |
| **Instrumentation** | Manual + Auto | Manual | Manual | Auto-first | Auto-first | Manual |
| **Backend** | Any (exporters) | Self | Self | Self | Self | Self |
| **CNCF Status** | Incubating | Graduated | NO | Incubating | NO | Graduated |
> **Why OpenTelemetry?** It's the only actively maintained, full-featured C++ option with vendor neutrality — allowing export to Tempo, Prometheus, Grafana, or any commercial backend without changing instrumentation.
---
## Slide 3: Adoption Scope — Traces Only (Current Plan)
OpenTelemetry supports three signal types: **Traces**, **Metrics**, and **Logs**. xrpld already captures metrics (StatsD via Beast Insight) and logs (Journal/PerfLog). The question is: how much of OTel do we adopt?
> **Scenario A**: Add distributed tracing. Keep StatsD for metrics and Journal for logs.
```mermaid
flowchart LR
subgraph xrpld["xrpld Process"]
direction TB
OTel["OTel SDK<br/>(Traces)"]
Insight["Beast Insight<br/>(StatsD Metrics)"]
Journal["Journal + PerfLog<br/>(Logging)"]
end
OTel -->|"OTLP"| Collector["OTel Collector"]
Insight -->|"UDP"| StatsD["StatsD Server"]
Journal -->|"File I/O"| LogFile["perf.log / debug.log"]
Collector --> Tempo["Tempo"]
StatsD --> Graphite["Graphite / Grafana"]
LogFile --> Loki["Loki (optional)"]
style xrpld fill:#424242,stroke:#212121,color:#fff
style OTel fill:#2e7d32,stroke:#1b5e20,color:#fff
style Insight fill:#1565c0,stroke:#0d47a1,color:#fff
style Journal fill:#e65100,stroke:#bf360c,color:#fff
style Collector fill:#2e7d32,stroke:#1b5e20,color:#fff
```
| Aspect | Details |
| ------------------------------ | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| **What changes for operators** | Deploy OTel Collector + trace backend. Existing StatsD and log pipelines stay as-is. |
| **Codebase impact** | New `Telemetry` module (~1500 LOC). Beast Insight and Journal untouched. |
| **New capabilities** | Cross-node trace correlation, span-based debugging, request lifecycle visibility. |
| **What we still can't do** | Correlate metrics with specific traces natively. StatsD metrics remain fire-and-forget with no trace exemplars. |
| **Maintenance burden** | Three separate observability systems to maintain (OTel + StatsD + Journal). |
| **Risk** | Lowest — additive change, no existing systems disturbed. |
---
## Slide 4: Future Adoption — Metrics & Logs via OTel
### Scenario B: + OTel Metrics (Replace StatsD)
> Migrate StatsD to OTel Metrics API, exposing Prometheus-compatible metrics. Remove Beast Insight.
```mermaid
flowchart LR
subgraph xrpld["xrpld Process"]
direction TB
OTel["OTel SDK<br/>(Traces + Metrics)"]
Journal["Journal + PerfLog<br/>(Logging)"]
end
OTel -->|"OTLP"| Collector["OTel Collector"]
Journal -->|"File I/O"| LogFile["perf.log / debug.log"]
Collector --> Tempo["Tempo<br/>(Traces)"]
Collector --> Prom["Prometheus<br/>(Metrics)"]
LogFile --> Loki["Loki (optional)"]
style xrpld fill:#424242,stroke:#212121,color:#fff
style OTel fill:#2e7d32,stroke:#1b5e20,color:#fff
style Journal fill:#e65100,stroke:#bf360c,color:#fff
style Collector fill:#2e7d32,stroke:#1b5e20,color:#fff
```
- **Better metrics?** Yes — Prometheus gives native histograms (p50/p95/p99), multi-dimensional labels, and exemplars linking metric spikes to traces.
- **Codebase**: Remove `Beast::Insight` + `StatsDCollector` (~2000 LOC). Single SDK for traces and metrics.
- **Operator effort**: Rewrite dashboards from StatsD/Graphite queries to PromQL. Run both in parallel during transition.
- **Risk**: Medium — operators must migrate monitoring infrastructure.
### Scenario C: + OTel Logs (Full Stack)
> Also replace Journal logging with OTel Logs API. Single SDK for everything.
```mermaid
flowchart LR
subgraph xrpld["xrpld Process"]
OTel["OTel SDK<br/>(Traces + Metrics + Logs)"]
end
OTel -->|"OTLP"| Collector["OTel Collector"]
Collector --> Tempo["Tempo<br/>(Traces)"]
Collector --> Prom["Prometheus<br/>(Metrics)"]
Collector --> Loki["Loki / Elastic<br/>(Logs)"]
style xrpld fill:#424242,stroke:#212121,color:#fff
style OTel fill:#2e7d32,stroke:#1b5e20,color:#fff
style Collector fill:#2e7d32,stroke:#1b5e20,color:#fff
```
- **Structured logging**: OTel Logs API outputs structured records with `trace_id`, `span_id`, severity, and attributes by design.
- **Full correlation**: Every log line carries `trace_id`. Click trace → see logs. Click metric spike → see trace → see logs.
- **Codebase**: Remove Beast Insight (~2000 LOC) + simplify Journal/PerfLog (~3000 LOC). One dependency instead of three.
- **Risk**: Highest — `beast::Journal` is deeply embedded in every component. Large refactor. OTel C++ Logs API is newer (stable since v1.11, less battle-tested).
### Recommendation
```mermaid
flowchart LR
A["Phase 1<br/><b>Traces Only</b><br/>(Current Plan)"] --> B["Phase 2<br/><b>+ Metrics</b><br/>(Replace StatsD)"] --> C["Phase 3<br/><b>+ Logs</b><br/>(Full OTel)"]
style A fill:#2e7d32,stroke:#1b5e20,color:#fff
style B fill:#1565c0,stroke:#0d47a1,color:#fff
style C fill:#e65100,stroke:#bf360c,color:#fff
```
| Phase | Signal | Strategy | Risk |
| -------------------- | --------- | -------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ |
| **Phase 1** (now) | Traces | Add OTel traces. Keep StatsD and Journal. Prove value. | Low |
| **Phase 2** (future) | + Metrics | Migrate StatsD → Prometheus via OTel. Remove Beast Insight. | Medium |
| **Phase 3** (future) | + Logs | Adopt OTel Logs API. Align with structured logging initiative. | High |
> **Key Takeaway**: Start with traces (unique value, lowest risk), then incrementally adopt metrics and logs as the OTel infrastructure proves itself.
---
## Slide 5: Comparison with xrpld's Existing Solutions
### Current Observability Stack
| Aspect | PerfLog (JSON) | StatsD (Metrics) | OpenTelemetry (NEW) |
| --------------------- | --------------------- | --------------------- | --------------------------- |
| **Type** | Logging | Metrics | Distributed Tracing |
| **Scope** | Single node | Single node | **Cross-node** |
| **Data** | JSON log entries | Counters, gauges | Spans with context |
| **Correlation** | By timestamp | By metric name | By `trace_id` |
| **Overhead** | Low (file I/O) | Low (UDP) | Low-Medium (configurable) |
| **Question Answered** | "What happened here?" | "How many? How fast?" | **"What was the journey?"** |
### Use Case Matrix
| Scenario | PerfLog | StatsD | OpenTelemetry |
| -------------------------------- | ------- | ------ | ------------- |
| "How many TXs per second?" | ❌ | ✅ | ❌ |
| "Why was this specific TX slow?" | ⚠️ | ❌ | ✅ |
| "Which node delayed consensus?" | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ |
| "Show TX journey across 5 nodes" | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ |
> **Key Insight**: In the **traces-only** approach (Phase 1), OpenTelemetry **complements** existing systems. In future phases, OTel metrics and logs could **replace** StatsD and Journal respectively — see Slides 3-4 for the full adoption roadmap.
---
## Slide 6: Architecture
> **OTLP** = OpenTelemetry Protocol | **WS** = WebSocket
### High-Level Integration Architecture
```mermaid
flowchart TB
subgraph xrpld["xrpld Node"]
subgraph services["Core Services"]
direction LR
RPC["RPC Server<br/>(HTTP/WS)"] ~~~ Overlay["Overlay<br/>(P2P Network)"] ~~~ Consensus["Consensus<br/>(RCLConsensus)"]
end
Telemetry["Telemetry Module<br/>(OpenTelemetry SDK)"]
services --> Telemetry
end
Telemetry -->|OTLP/gRPC| Collector["OTel Collector"]
Collector --> Tempo["Grafana Tempo"]
Collector --> Elastic["Elastic APM"]
style xrpld fill:#424242,stroke:#212121,color:#fff
style services fill:#1565c0,stroke:#0d47a1,color:#fff
style Telemetry fill:#2e7d32,stroke:#1b5e20,color:#fff
style Collector fill:#e65100,stroke:#bf360c,color:#fff
```
**Reading the diagram:**
- **Core Services (blue, top)**: RPC Server, Overlay, and Consensus are the three primary components that generate trace data — they represent the entry points for client requests, peer messages, and consensus rounds respectively.
- **Telemetry Module (green, middle)**: The OpenTelemetry SDK sits below the core services and receives span data from all three; it acts as a single collection point within the xrpld process.
- **OTel Collector (orange, center)**: An external process that receives spans over OTLP/gRPC from the Telemetry Module; it decouples xrpld from backend choices and handles batching, sampling, and routing.
- **Backends (bottom row)**: Tempo and Elastic APM are interchangeable — the Collector fans out to any combination, so operators can switch backends without modifying xrpld code.
- **Top-to-bottom flow**: Data flows from instrumented code down through the SDK, out over the network to the Collector, and finally into storage/visualization backends.
### Context Propagation
```mermaid
sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant NodeA as Node A
participant NodeB as Node B
Client->>NodeA: Submit TX (no context)
Note over NodeA: Creates trace_id: abc123<br/>span: tx.receive
NodeA->>NodeB: Relay TX<br/>(traceparent: abc123)
Note over NodeB: Links to trace_id: abc123<br/>span: tx.relay
```
- **HTTP/RPC**: W3C Trace Context headers (`traceparent`)
- **P2P Messages**: Protocol Buffer extension fields
---
## Slide 7: Implementation Plan
### 5-Phase Rollout (9 Weeks)
> **Note**: Dates shown are relative to project start, not calendar dates.
```mermaid
gantt
title Implementation Timeline
dateFormat YYYY-MM-DD
axisFormat Week %W
section Phase 1
Core Infrastructure :p1, 2024-01-01, 2w
section Phase 2
RPC Tracing :p2, after p1, 2w
section Phase 3
Transaction Tracing :p3, after p2, 2w
section Phase 4
Consensus Tracing :p4, after p3, 2w
section Phase 5
Documentation :p5, after p4, 1w
```
### Phase Details
| Phase | Focus | Key Deliverables | Effort |
| ----- | ------------------- | -------------------------------------------- | ------- |
| 1 | Core Infrastructure | SDK integration, Telemetry interface, Config | 10 days |
| 2 | RPC Tracing | HTTP context extraction, Handler spans | 10 days |
| 3 | Transaction Tracing | Protobuf context, P2P relay propagation | 10 days |
| 4 | Consensus Tracing | Round spans, Proposal/validation tracing | 10 days |
| 5 | Documentation | Runbook, Dashboards, Training | 7 days |
**Total Effort**: ~47 developer-days (2 developers)
> **Future Phases** (not in current scope): After traces are stable, OTel metrics can replace StatsD (~3 weeks), and OTel logs can replace Journal (~4 weeks, aligned with structured logging initiative). See Slides 3-4 for the full adoption roadmap.
---
## Slide 8: Performance Overhead
> **OTLP** = OpenTelemetry Protocol
### Estimated System Impact
| Metric | Overhead | Notes |
| ----------------- | ---------- | ------------------------------------------------ |
| **CPU** | 1-3% | Span creation and attribute setting |
| **Memory** | ~10 MB | SDK statics + batch buffer + worker thread stack |
| **Network** | 10-50 KB/s | Compressed OTLP export to collector |
| **Latency (p99)** | <2% | With proper sampling configuration |
#### How We Arrived at These Numbers
**Assumptions (XRPL mainnet baseline)**:
| Parameter | Value | Source |
| ------------------------- | ---------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| Transaction throughput | ~25 TPS (peaks to ~50) | Mainnet average |
| Default peers per node | 21 | `peerfinder/detail/Tuning.h` (`defaultMaxPeers`) |
| Consensus round frequency | ~1 round / 3-4 seconds | `ConsensusParms.h` (`ledgerMIN_CONSENSUS=1950ms`) |
| Proposers per round | ~20-35 | Mainnet UNL size |
| P2P message rate | ~160 msgs/sec | See message breakdown below |
| Avg TX processing time | ~200 μs | Profiled baseline |
| Single span creation cost | 500-1000 ns | OTel C++ SDK benchmarks (see [3.5.4](./03-implementation-strategy.md#354-performance-data-sources)) |
**P2P message breakdown** (per node, mainnet):
| Message Type | Rate | Derivation |
| ------------- | ------------ | --------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| TMTransaction | ~100/sec | ~25 TPS × ~4 relay hops per TX, deduplicated by HashRouter |
| TMValidation | ~50/sec | ~35 validators × ~1 validation/3s round ~12/sec, plus relay fan-out |
| TMProposeSet | ~10/sec | ~35 proposers / 3s round ~12/round, clustered in establish phase |
| **Total** | **~160/sec** | **Only traced message types counted** |
**CPU (1-3%) — Calculation**:
Per-transaction tracing cost breakdown:
| Operation | Cost | Notes |
| ----------------------------------------------- | ----------- | ------------------------------------------ |
| `tx.receive` span (create + end + 4 attributes) | ~1400 ns | ~1000ns create + ~200ns end + 4×50ns attrs |
| `tx.validate` span | ~1200 ns | ~1000ns create + ~200ns for 2 attributes |
| `tx.relay` span | ~1200 ns | ~1000ns create + ~200ns for 2 attributes |
| Context injection into P2P message | ~200 ns | Serialize trace_id + span_id into protobuf |
| **Total per TX** | **~4.0 μs** | |
> **CPU overhead**: 4.0 μs / 200 μs baseline = **~2.0% per transaction**. Under high load with consensus + RPC spans overlapping, reaches ~3%. Consensus itself adds only ~36 μs per 3-second round (~0.001%), so the TX path dominates. On production server hardware (3+ GHz Xeon), span creation drops to ~500-600 ns, bringing per-TX cost to ~2.6 μs (~1.3%). See [Section 3.5.4](./03-implementation-strategy.md#354-performance-data-sources) for benchmark sources.
**Memory (~10 MB) — Calculation**:
| Component | Size | Notes |
| --------------------------------------------- | ------------------ | ------------------------------------- |
| TracerProvider + Exporter (gRPC channel init) | ~320 KB | Allocated once at startup |
| BatchSpanProcessor (circular buffer) | ~16 KB | 2049 × 8-byte AtomicUniquePtr entries |
| BatchSpanProcessor (worker thread stack) | ~8 MB | Default Linux thread stack size |
| Active spans (in-flight, max ~1000) | ~500-800 KB | ~500-800 bytes/span × 1000 concurrent |
| Export queue (batch buffer, max 2048 spans) | ~1 MB | ~500 bytes/span × 2048 queue depth |
| Thread-local context storage (~100 threads) | ~6.4 KB | ~64 bytes/thread |
| **Total** | **~10 MB ceiling** | |
> Memory plateaus once the export queue fills — the `max_queue_size=2048` config bounds growth.
> The worker thread stack (~8 MB) dominates the static footprint but is virtual memory; actual RSS
> depends on stack usage (typically much less). Active spans are larger than originally estimated
> (~500-800 bytes) because the OTel SDK `Span` object includes a mutex (~40 bytes), `SpanData`
> recordable (~250 bytes base), and `std::map`-based attribute storage (~200-500 bytes for 3-5
> string attributes). See [Section 3.5.4](./03-implementation-strategy.md#354-performance-data-sources) for source references.
**Network (10-50 KB/s) — Calculation**:
Two sources of network overhead:
**(A) OTLP span export to Collector:**
| Sampling Rate | Effective Spans/sec | Avg Span Size (compressed) | Bandwidth |
| -------------------------- | ------------------- | -------------------------- | ------------ |
| 100% (dev only) | ~500 | ~500 bytes | ~250 KB/s |
| **10% (recommended prod)** | **~50** | **~500 bytes** | **~25 KB/s** |
| 1% (minimal) | ~5 | ~500 bytes | ~2.5 KB/s |
> The ~500 spans/sec at 100% comes from: ~100 TX spans + ~160 P2P context spans + ~23 consensus spans/round + ~50 RPC spans = ~500/sec. OTLP protobuf with gzip compression yields ~500 bytes/span average.
**(B) P2P trace context overhead** (added to existing messages, always-on regardless of sampling):
| Message Type | Rate | Context Size | Bandwidth |
| ------------- | -------- | ------------ | ------------- |
| TMTransaction | ~100/sec | 29 bytes | ~2.9 KB/s |
| TMValidation | ~50/sec | 29 bytes | ~1.5 KB/s |
| TMProposeSet | ~10/sec | 29 bytes | ~0.3 KB/s |
| **Total P2P** | | | **~4.7 KB/s** |
> **Combined**: 25 KB/s (OTLP export at 10%) + 5 KB/s (P2P context) ≈ **~30 KB/s typical**. The 10-50 KB/s range covers 10-20% sampling under normal to peak mainnet load.
**Latency (<2%) — Calculation**:
| Path | Tracing Cost | Baseline | Overhead |
| ------------------------------ | ------------ | -------- | -------- |
| Fast RPC (e.g., `server_info`) | 2.75 μs | ~1 ms | 0.275% |
| Slow RPC (e.g., `path_find`) | 2.75 μs | ~100 ms | 0.003% |
| Transaction processing | 4.0 μs | ~200 μs | 2.0% |
| Consensus round | 36 μs | ~3 sec | 0.001% |
> At p99, even the worst case (TX processing at 2.0%) is within the 1-3% range. RPC and consensus overhead are negligible. On production hardware, TX overhead drops to ~1.3%.
### Per-Message Overhead (Context Propagation)
Each P2P message carries trace context with the following overhead:
| Field | Size | Description |
| ------------- | ------------- | ----------------------------------------- |
| `trace_id` | 16 bytes | Unique identifier for the entire trace |
| `span_id` | 8 bytes | Current span (becomes parent on receiver) |
| `trace_flags` | 1 byte | Sampling decision flags |
| `trace_state` | 0-4 bytes | Optional vendor-specific data |
| **Total** | **~29 bytes** | **Added per traced P2P message** |
```mermaid
flowchart LR
subgraph msg["P2P Message with Trace Context"]
A["Original Message<br/>(variable size)"] --> B["+ TraceContext<br/>(~29 bytes)"]
end
subgraph breakdown["Context Breakdown"]
C["trace_id<br/>16 bytes"]
D["span_id<br/>8 bytes"]
E["flags<br/>1 byte"]
F["state<br/>0-4 bytes"]
end
B --> breakdown
style A fill:#424242,stroke:#212121,color:#fff
style B fill:#2e7d32,stroke:#1b5e20,color:#fff
style C fill:#1565c0,stroke:#0d47a1,color:#fff
style D fill:#1565c0,stroke:#0d47a1,color:#fff
style E fill:#e65100,stroke:#bf360c,color:#fff
style F fill:#4a148c,stroke:#2e0d57,color:#fff
```
**Reading the diagram:**
- **Original Message (gray, left)**: The existing P2P message payload of variable size this is unchanged; trace context is appended, never modifying the original data.
- **+ TraceContext (green, right of message)**: The additional 29-byte context block attached to each traced message; the arrow from the original message shows it is a pure addition.
- **Context Breakdown (right subgraph)**: The four fields `trace_id` (16 bytes), `span_id` (8 bytes), `flags` (1 byte), and `state` (0-4 bytes) show exactly what is added and their individual sizes.
- **Color coding**: Blue fields (`trace_id`, `span_id`) are the core identifiers required for trace correlation; orange (`flags`) controls sampling decisions; purple (`state`) is optional vendor data typically omitted.
> **Note**: 29 bytes represents ~1-6% overhead depending on message size (500B simple TX to 5KB proposal), which is acceptable for the observability benefits provided.
### Mitigation Strategies
```mermaid
flowchart LR
A["Head Sampling<br/>10% default"] --> B["Tail Sampling<br/>Keep errors/slow"] --> C["Batch Export<br/>Reduce I/O"] --> D["Conditional Compile<br/>XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY"]
style A fill:#1565c0,stroke:#0d47a1,color:#fff
style B fill:#2e7d32,stroke:#1b5e20,color:#fff
style C fill:#e65100,stroke:#bf360c,color:#fff
style D fill:#4a148c,stroke:#2e0d57,color:#fff
```
> For a detailed explanation of head vs. tail sampling, see Slide 9.
### Kill Switches (Rollback Options)
1. **Config Disable**: Set `enabled=0` in config instant disable, no restart needed for sampling
2. **Rebuild**: Compile with `XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY=OFF` zero overhead (no-op)
3. **Full Revert**: Clean separation allows easy commit reversion
---
## Slide 9: Sampling Strategies — Head vs. Tail
> Sampling controls **which traces are recorded and exported**. Without sampling, every operation generates a trace — at 500+ spans/sec, this overwhelms storage and network. Sampling lets you keep the signal, discard the noise.
### Head Sampling (Decision at Start)
The sampling decision is made **when a trace begins**, before any work is done. A random number is generated; if it falls within the configured ratio, the entire trace is recorded. Otherwise, the trace is silently dropped.
```mermaid
flowchart LR
A["New Request<br/>Arrives"] --> B{"Random < 10%?"}
B -->|"Yes (1 in 10)"| C["Record Entire Trace<br/>(all spans)"]
B -->|"No (9 in 10)"| D["Drop Entire Trace<br/>(zero overhead)"]
style C fill:#2e7d32,stroke:#1b5e20,color:#fff
style D fill:#c62828,stroke:#8c2809,color:#fff
style B fill:#1565c0,stroke:#0d47a1,color:#fff
```
| Aspect | Details |
| ----------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| **Where it runs** | Inside xrpld (SDK-level). Configured via `sampling_ratio` in `xrpld.cfg`. |
| **When the decision happens** | At trace creation time before the first span is even populated. |
| **How it works** | `sampling_ratio=0.1` means each trace has a 10% probability of being recorded. Dropped traces incur near-zero overhead (no spans created, no attributes set, no export). |
| **Propagation** | Once a trace is sampled, the `trace_flags` field (1 byte in the context header) tells downstream nodes to also sample it. Unsampled traces propagate `trace_flags=0`, so downstream nodes skip them too. |
| **Pros** | Lowest overhead. Simple to configure. Predictable resource usage. |
| **Cons** | **Blind** it doesn't know if the trace will be interesting. A rare error or slow consensus round has only a 10% chance of being captured. |
| **Best for** | High-volume, steady-state traffic where most traces look similar (e.g., routine RPC requests). |
**xrpld configuration**:
```ini
[telemetry]
# Record 10% of traces (recommended for production)
sampling_ratio=0.1
```
### Tail Sampling (Decision at End)
The sampling decision is made **after the trace completes**, based on its actual content was it slow? Did it error? Was it a consensus round? This requires buffering complete traces before deciding.
```mermaid
flowchart TB
A["All Traces<br/>Buffered (100%)"] --> B["OTel Collector<br/>Evaluates Rules"]
B --> C{"Error?"}
C -->|Yes| K["KEEP"]
C -->|No| D{"Slow?<br/>(>5s consensus,<br/>>1s RPC)"}
D -->|Yes| K
D -->|No| E{"Random < 10%?"}
E -->|Yes| K
E -->|No| F["DROP"]
style K fill:#2e7d32,stroke:#1b5e20,color:#fff
style F fill:#c62828,stroke:#8c2809,color:#fff
style B fill:#1565c0,stroke:#0d47a1,color:#fff
style C fill:#e65100,stroke:#bf360c,color:#fff
style D fill:#e65100,stroke:#bf360c,color:#fff
style E fill:#4a148c,stroke:#2e0d57,color:#fff
```
| Aspect | Details |
| ----------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| **Where it runs** | In the **OTel Collector** (external process), not inside xrpld. xrpld exports 100% of traces; the Collector decides what to keep. |
| **When the decision happens** | After the Collector has received all spans for a trace (waits `decision_wait=10s` for stragglers). |
| **How it works** | Policy rules evaluate the completed trace: keep all errors, keep slow operations above a threshold, keep all consensus rounds, then probabilistically sample the rest at 10%. |
| **Pros** | **Never misses important traces**. Errors, slow requests, and consensus anomalies are always captured regardless of probability. |
| **Cons** | Higher resource usage xrpld must export 100% of spans to the Collector, which buffers them in memory before deciding. The Collector needs more RAM (configured via `num_traces` and `decision_wait`). |
| **Best for** | Production troubleshooting where you can't afford to miss errors or anomalies. |
**Collector configuration** (tail sampling rules for xrpld):
```yaml
processors:
tail_sampling:
decision_wait: 10s # Wait for all spans in a trace
num_traces: 100000 # Buffer up to 100K concurrent traces
policies:
- name: errors # Always keep error traces
type: status_code
status_code: { status_codes: [ERROR] }
- name: slow-consensus # Keep consensus rounds >5s
type: latency
latency: { threshold_ms: 5000 }
- name: slow-rpc # Keep slow RPC requests >1s
type: latency
latency: { threshold_ms: 1000 }
- name: probabilistic # Sample 10% of everything else
type: probabilistic
probabilistic: { sampling_percentage: 10 }
```
### Head vs. Tail — Side-by-Side
| | Head Sampling | Tail Sampling |
| ----------------------------- | ---------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------ |
| **Decision point** | Trace start (inside xrpld) | Trace end (in OTel Collector) |
| **Knows trace content?** | No (random coin flip) | Yes (evaluates completed trace) |
| **Overhead on xrpld** | Lowest (dropped traces = no-op) | Higher (must export 100% to Collector) |
| **Collector resource usage** | Low (receives only sampled traces) | Higher (buffers all traces before deciding) |
| **Captures all errors?** | No (only if trace was randomly selected) | **Yes** (error policy catches them) |
| **Captures slow operations?** | No (random) | **Yes** (latency policy catches them) |
| **Configuration** | `xrpld.cfg`: `sampling_ratio=0.1` | `otel-collector.yaml`: `tail_sampling` processor |
| **Best for** | High-throughput steady-state | Troubleshooting & anomaly detection |
### Recommended Strategy for xrpld
Use **both** in a layered approach:
```mermaid
flowchart LR
subgraph xrpld["xrpld (Head Sampling)"]
HS["sampling_ratio=1.0<br/>(export everything)"]
end
subgraph collector["OTel Collector (Tail Sampling)"]
TS["Keep: errors + slow + 10% random<br/>Drop: routine traces"]
end
subgraph storage["Backend Storage"]
ST["Only interesting traces<br/>stored long-term"]
end
xrpld -->|"100% of spans"| collector -->|"~15-20% kept"| storage
style xrpld fill:#424242,stroke:#212121,color:#fff
style collector fill:#1565c0,stroke:#0d47a1,color:#fff
style storage fill:#2e7d32,stroke:#1b5e20,color:#fff
```
> **Why this works**: xrpld exports everything (no blind drops), the Collector applies intelligent filtering (keep errors/slow/anomalies, sample the rest), and only ~15-20% of traces reach storage. If Collector resource usage becomes a concern, add head sampling at `sampling_ratio=0.5` to halve the export volume while still giving the Collector enough data for good tail-sampling decisions.
---
## Slide 10: Data Collection & Privacy
### What Data is Collected
| Category | Attributes Collected | Purpose |
| --------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | --------------------------- |
| **Transaction** | `tx.hash`, `tx.type`, `tx.result`, `tx.fee`, `ledger_index` | Trace transaction lifecycle |
| **Consensus** | `round`, `phase`, `mode`, `proposers` (count of proposing validators), `duration_ms` | Analyze consensus timing |
| **RPC** | `command`, `version`, `status`, `duration_ms` | Monitor RPC performance |
| **Peer** | `peer.id`(public key), `latency_ms`, `message.type`, `message.size` | Network topology analysis |
| **Ledger** | `ledger.hash`, `ledger.index`, `close_time`, `tx_count` | Ledger progression tracking |
| **Job** | `job.type`, `queue_ms`, `worker` | JobQueue performance |
### What is NOT Collected (Privacy Guarantees)
```mermaid
flowchart LR
subgraph notCollected["❌ NOT Collected"]
direction LR
A["Private Keys"] ~~~ B["Account Balances"] ~~~ C["Transaction Amounts"]
end
subgraph alsoNot["❌ Also Excluded"]
direction LR
D["IP Addresses<br/>(configurable)"] ~~~ E["Personal Data"] ~~~ F["Raw TX Payloads"]
end
style A fill:#c62828,stroke:#8c2809,color:#fff
style B fill:#c62828,stroke:#8c2809,color:#fff
style C fill:#c62828,stroke:#8c2809,color:#fff
style D fill:#c62828,stroke:#8c2809,color:#fff
style E fill:#c62828,stroke:#8c2809,color:#fff
style F fill:#c62828,stroke:#8c2809,color:#fff
```
**Reading the diagram:**
- **NOT Collected (top row, red)**: Private Keys, Account Balances, and Transaction Amounts are explicitly excluded these are financial/security-sensitive fields that telemetry never touches.
- **Also Excluded (bottom row, red)**: IP Addresses (configurable per deployment), Personal Data, and Raw TX Payloads are also excluded these protect operator and user privacy.
- **All-red styling**: Every box is styled in red to visually reinforce that these are hard exclusions, not optional the telemetry system has no code path to collect any of these fields.
- **Two-row layout**: The split between "NOT Collected" and "Also Excluded" distinguishes between financial data (top) and operational/personal data (bottom), making the privacy boundaries clear to auditors.
### Privacy Protection Mechanisms
| Mechanism | Description |
| -------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------- |
| **Account Hashing** | `xrpl.tx.account` is hashed at collector level before storage |
| **Configurable Redaction** | Sensitive fields can be excluded via config |
| **Sampling** | Only 10% of traces recorded by default (reduces exposure) |
| **Local Control** | Node operators control what gets exported |
| **No Raw Payloads** | Transaction content is never recorded, only metadata |
> **Key Principle**: Telemetry collects **operational metadata** (timing, counts, hashes) — never **sensitive content** (keys, balances, amounts).
---
_End of Presentation_

View File

@@ -1,239 +0,0 @@
# Securing OpenTelemetry Against Trace Context Spoofing
> **Part of**: [OpenTelemetry Implementation Plan](./OpenTelemetryPlan.md) — see also [Design Decisions § Privacy](./02-design-decisions.md#244-privacy--sensitive-data-policy) (what we don't collect) and [Configuration Reference § 5.5](./05-configuration-reference.md#55-opentelemetry-collector-configuration) (collector base config).
Trace context spoofing (or poisoning) occurs when untrusted actors inject tampered or stale trace IDs into your system. If these requests are processed, the spans are appended to historical trace buckets, stretching trace durations, ruining p99 latency metrics, and breaking Grafana dashboards.
This guide outlines two categories of defense: mitigating tampered contexts and locking down the OpenTelemetry (OTel) Collector to trusted clients only.
---
## Part 1: Mitigating Tampered Trace Contexts
### 1. Perimeter Defense: Strip Headers at the API Gateway
The most effective way to prevent spoofing from external sources is to treat your API Gateway (Envoy, NGINX, AWS ALB) as a hard boundary. Strip incoming W3C tracing headers (`traceparent`, `tracestate`) from public traffic so the gateway is forced to generate a fresh, legitimate `trace_id`.
**NGINX Example (Stripping Headers):**
```nginx
server {
listen 80;
location {
# Clear out untrusted incoming trace headers
proxy_set_header traceparent "";
proxy_set_header tracestate "";
proxy_pass http://backend_service;
}
}
```
### **2. Timestamp-Anchored Trace IDs and OTTL Filtering**
If you use a custom trace ID generator that embeds a timestamp in the first few bytes (like AWS X-Ray or UUIDv7), you can use the OTel Collector's OpenTelemetry Transform Language (OTTL) to detect anomalies.
**Collector Configuration (Conceptual OTTL Filter):**
```yaml
processors:
filter/stale_traces:
error_mode: ignore
traces:
span:
# Example: Drop spans where the start time is significantly different
# from an expected parameter or embedded timestamp logic.
# Note: Standard W3C trace IDs do not contain timestamps by default.
- 'Keep out-of-bounds spans: time.sub(start_time, now()) > duration("1h")'
```
## **Part 2: Restricting Access to the OTel Collector**
Locking down the Collector ensures that only authenticated, trusted clients can submit telemetry data.
### **Approach A: Network Layer Security (Kubernetes Network Policies)**
Ensure your Collector is not exposed to the public internet. If running in Kubernetes, use a NetworkPolicy to restrict ingress traffic to specific namespaces.
**Kubernetes NetworkPolicy Example:**
```yaml
apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1
kind: NetworkPolicy
metadata:
name: allow-internal-otel
namespace: observability
spec:
podSelector:
matchLabels:
app: opentelemetry-collector
policyTypes:
- Ingress
ingress:
- from:
- namespaceSelector:
matchLabels:
environment: production
ports:
- protocol: TCP
port: 4317 # gRPC
- protocol: TCP
port: 4318 # HTTP
```
### **Approach B: Transport Layer Security (Mutual TLS / mTLS)**
Require clients to present a valid cryptographic certificate to connect to the Collector.
**Collector Configuration (mTLS):**
```yaml
receivers:
otlp:
protocols:
grpc:
endpoint: 0.0.0.0:4317
tls:
client_ca_file: /certs/client_ca.pem # CA that signs trusted client certs
cert_file: /certs/collector.pem
key_file: /certs/collector.key
auth_type: require_and_verify_client_cert # Rejects unauthorized clients
```
### **Approach C: Application Layer Authentication (Basic Auth Extension)**
Use the Collector's extension system to require an API key or Basic Auth credentials.
**Collector Configuration (Basic Auth):**
```yaml
extensions:
basicauth/collector:
htpasswd:
inline: |
# username:trusted-client, password:SecurePassword123
trusted-client:$apr1$4v8p76o6$DMTX5Wv6uOmrFAZp2X1N1.
receivers:
otlp:
protocols:
grpc:
endpoint: 0.0.0.0:4317
auth:
authenticator: basicauth/collector
processors:
batch:
exporters:
otlp:
endpoint: my-backend-storage:4317
service:
extensions: [basicauth/collector]
pipelines:
traces:
receivers: [otlp]
processors: [batch]
exporters: [otlp]
```
**Client Setup (Environment Variables):**
Developers must pass the authentication header using the standard OTel SDK environment variables:
```bash
# Base64 encoded "trusted-client:SecurePassword123"
export OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_HEADERS="Authorization=Basic dHJ1c3RlZC1jbGllbnQ6U2VjdXJlUGFzc3dvcmQxMjM="
```
---
Available routes to build on top of: https://github.com/XRPLF/rippled/pull/6425#discussion_r3234751995
---
# Analysis: Applying the Guide to xrpld
The guide above is written for HTTP-fronted web services. xrpld is a P2P node daemon, so the threat model and the applicable defenses differ. This section captures how each approach maps to xrpld and the chosen direction.
## Threat Model
xrpld has **two distinct attack surfaces**, not one. The original guide conflates them under "trace context spoofing"; for xrpld they need separate defenses.
| Surface | Attacker | Vector | Defense |
| ----------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | --------------------------------------------- |
| **Collector ingress** (xrpld → collector) | Anyone who can reach `4317`/`4318` on the collector host | Forged OTLP traffic, telemetry exfiltration, DoS on collector | mTLS + network policy |
| **Peer trace context** (peer → xrpld) | Malicious peer in the XRPL overlay | Crafted `protocol::TraceContext` field inside peer protobuf messages (TMTransaction, consensus, etc.) — used to forge `trace_id`/`span_id`, pollute p99, attach spans to historical traces | Validate + rate-limit at the receive boundary |
**Deployment context:** Across-network. xrpld nodes (potentially run by external operators or in different DCs) ship telemetry to a centrally-hosted collector across an untrusted network. The collector is NOT on the same host or private VPC as every node.
```
┌── peer (untrusted) ── TMTransaction{trace_context} ──▶ xrpld
│ │
│ [validate + rate-limit]
│ │
│ ▼
│ SpanGuard (clean)
│ │
│ │ OTLP/gRPC
│ │ + mTLS
│ ▼
└───────────────────────────────────────── [require_and_verify_client_cert]
OTel Collector
(in private subnet, NetPol)
```
## Part 1 Applicability — Peer Trace-Context Validation
The guide's NGINX header stripping and OTTL stale-span filtering target HTTP gateways and post-hoc cleanup. Neither fits xrpld directly:
- **NGINX header stripping** — N/A. There is no HTTP gateway between peers and xrpld; trace context arrives inside protobuf peer messages (`protocol::TraceContext`), not as W3C `traceparent` headers. See [src/xrpld/telemetry/PropagationHelpers.h](../src/xrpld/telemetry/PropagationHelpers.h).
- **OTTL stale-span filtering** — Weak fit. Post-hoc cleanup at the collector loses peer identity (you can't tell _which_ peer poisoned the trace). Validation at the receive site is stronger.
**xrpld-specific Part 1 mitigations:**
1. **Validate extracted context at the boundary** in [src/xrpld/telemetry/ConsensusReceiveTracing.h](../src/xrpld/telemetry/ConsensusReceiveTracing.h) and any other peer-message receive site. Reject if `trace_id` is all-zero, wrong length, or fails W3C format checks. Treat invalid context as "no propagated context" — start a fresh span — rather than dropping the message.
2. **Per-peer sample rate limiting** so a hostile peer cannot flood the collector with spans bearing a fabricated `trace_id`. Use probabilistic sampling on the receive path keyed by peer identity.
## Part 2 — Comparison of Collector Hardening Approaches
Evaluated for the across-network deployment shape:
| Approach | Across-network fit | Cost | Verdict |
| ------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------- |
| **A. NetworkPolicy / firewall** | Necessary baseline (don't expose `4317`/`4318` to the internet), but insufficient on its own when traffic genuinely crosses networks — you cannot NetworkPolicy the public internet. | Cheap. | **Defense-in-depth, not primary.** |
| **B. mTLS** | Strongest fit. Every xrpld node holds a client cert; collector verifies with `require_and_verify_client_cert`. Encrypts in transit (raw OTLP over the internet leaks transaction patterns and validator identity). Compromised node = revoke one cert, no shared secret to rotate everywhere. | Cert issuance + rotation pipeline. | **Primary.** |
| **C. Basic Auth** | Worst shape for this topology. Single shared password across all xrpld nodes — one leaked node config compromises the whole fleet. Doesn't encrypt; you'd need TLS underneath anyway, at which point you're 80% of the way to mTLS. | Cheap to set up, expensive to operate (rotation across N operators). | **Skip.** |
## Decision
**Primary defense:** mTLS (Approach B) on the collector's OTLP receivers, with `auth_type: require_and_verify_client_cert`.
**Defense-in-depth:** NetworkPolicy / firewall rules (Approach A) so `4317`/`4318` are never reachable from outside the expected operator subnets even if mTLS were misconfigured.
**Skipped:** Basic Auth (Approach C) — wrong shape for an across-network, multi-operator topology.
**Plus xrpld-specific Part 1 work:** trace-context validation and per-peer rate limiting at peer-message receive sites.
## Decisions Made
| Decision | Choice | Rationale |
| -------------------- | -------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| Cert source for mTLS | **Reuse XRPL node identity key** | One identity per node, no separate PKI to operate. Fits XRPL's existing trust model; requires small CA tooling step to derive/sign the OTel client cert from the node key. |
| Part 1 scope | **Include in this spec** | Collector hardening and peer trace-context validation share one threat model. Coherent design doc; can still be split into multiple PRs at implementation. |
| Dev impact | **Production-only** | Local `docker/telemetry/docker-compose.yml` keeps `insecure: true` and no auth for fast iteration. Only production deployment manifests gain mTLS. Accepted risk: minor dev/prod drift, mitigated by integration tests against a TLS-enabled collector in CI. |
## Out of Scope
- NGINX/Envoy header stripping (no HTTP gateway in front of xrpld-to-collector traffic).
- OTTL stale-span filtering at the collector (weaker than source validation; loses peer identity).
- Local development docker-compose hardening.
- Telemetry backend (Tempo) hardening — separate concern, downstream of the collector.
## Next Step
Write this up as a design doc with full sections covering:
1. Threat model & architecture (this section, expanded)
2. Collector hardening — mTLS config, NetworkPolicy
3. Cert pipeline — deriving OTel client cert from XRPL node key
4. Peer trace-context validation — receive-site checks in `ConsensusReceiveTracing.h`
5. Per-peer span rate limiting
6. Testing & rollout

395
SCOPE_OF_WORK.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,395 @@
# XRPLD Automated Documentation System — Scope of Work
## 1. Problem Statement
The XRP Ledger daemon (`xrpld`) is a ~275,000 line C++ codebase with 1,183
source files across the core library, protocol layer, and application server.
It is the single implementation of the XRP Ledger protocol and processes
billions of dollars in value.
Despite this criticality, the codebase has minimal inline documentation. Only
569 of 1,183 files contain any Doxygen-style doc comments, and most of those
are sparse — a class-level sentence or two, rarely covering individual methods,
parameters, or behavioral invariants.
The only formal documentation effort — an external specification by Common
Prefix — has fundamental structural problems:
- **Drift is the default state.** The spec lives in a separate repository
with no CI linkage to the codebase. Every commit to `rippled` that changes
behavior silently invalidates the spec. Even one week of drift makes
the spec unreliable.
- **Separate repo, separate context.** No contributor has both repos open.
When a bug comes in, the developer reads the code, not the spec. A
recent bug would have been caught if the code itself was documented.
- **No code-level documentation.** The spec describes system-level behavior
(payment engine, DEX) but does not document individual functions, classes,
parameters, or invariants. A developer working on a specific function
gets no help.
- **Vendor dependency.** Ripple has a critical documentation dependency on a
single external firm. If the contract ends, the spec orphans.
- **Perverse incentive.** The vendor profits from complexity and drift.
Cleaner code and better inline docs reduce the need for external
specification work.
## 2. Solution as Built
An automated, in-repo documentation system with five components, all living
alongside the code with no external repos and no external vendor dependency:
1. **Module skills** — Per-module knowledge files in [docs/skills/](docs/skills/)
that capture the "soul" of each subsystem (key files, patterns, pitfalls,
invariants). These are the durable, human-maintained context that the
automated agent and human contributors both consult.
2. **doc-agent (Claude Agent SDK app)** — A TypeScript tool at
[.github/scripts/doc-agent/](.github/scripts/doc-agent/) with three modes:
`document` (write Doxygen comments), `review` (detect drift on a diff),
and `regen-skills` (rebuild a skill file from current code).
3. **Doc-review GitHub Action** — Runs the review mode on every PR; posts
inline comments and a sticky summary. Currently warning-only.
4. **Coverage enforcement** — CI-enforced documentation coverage thresholds
that ratchet up over time, preventing regression.
5. **Developer slash commands** — Claude Code commands in
[.claude/commands/](.claude/commands/) for onboarding, architecture
questions, doc review, and bug pattern detection.
Documentation accuracy is enforced by CI the same way code style and test
coverage are enforced today.
## 3. Deliverables — Built
### 3.1 Documentation Standards
[docs/DOCUMENTATION_STANDARDS.md](docs/DOCUMENTATION_STANDARDS.md) — canonical
format guide defining:
- Javadoc-style `/** ... */` Doxygen comments (matches existing convention)
- Documentation levels: file, class, public method, free function, enum
- Required Doxygen tags: `@param`, `@return`, `@note`, `@invariant`
- Quality rules: document behavior and invariants, never paraphrase
signatures, terse style (25 lines for classes, 13 for functions)
### 3.2 Doxygen Configuration Changes
[docs/Doxyfile](docs/Doxyfile):
- `EXTRACT_ALL = NO` (was `YES`) — undocumented entities are flagged rather
than silently extracted
- `GENERATE_XML = YES` (was `NO`) — required for coverxygen to parse and
measure documentation coverage
### 3.3 Module Skills
Thirteen module-level skill files in [docs/skills/](docs/skills/), each one
a self-contained guide to a subsystem's responsibilities, key types, control
flow, conventions, and common pitfalls:
| Skill | Covers |
|-------|--------|
| [consensus.md](docs/skills/consensus.md) | XRPL consensus algorithm + RCL adapters |
| [cryptography.md](docs/skills/cryptography.md) | CSPRNG, secure erasure, key handling |
| [ledger.md](docs/skills/ledger.md) | ReadView/ApplyView, state tables, sandbox |
| [nodestore.md](docs/skills/nodestore.md) | RocksDB/NuDB/Memory backends |
| [peering.md](docs/skills/peering.md) | Overlay + peerfinder |
| [protocol.md](docs/skills/protocol.md) | STObject, SField, Serializer, TER, Keylets |
| [rpc.md](docs/skills/rpc.md) | RPC handler conventions |
| [shamap.md](docs/skills/shamap.md) | SHA-256 Merkle radix tree |
| [sql.md](docs/skills/sql.md) | SOCI database wrapper, checkpointing |
| [test.md](docs/skills/test.md) | Beast unit test framework conventions |
| [transactors.md](docs/skills/transactors.md) | Full transactor template |
| [websockets.md](docs/skills/websockets.md) | WS subscriptions/streams |
| [index.md](docs/skills/index.md) | Top-level codebase map |
These skills serve a dual purpose: they are reference docs for human
contributors, and they are injected as system-prompt context by the
doc-agent (mapping in [src/config.ts](.github/scripts/doc-agent/src/config.ts)).
[install-skills.sh](.github/scripts/doc-agent/install-skills.sh) installs
the same files as Claude Code skills under `.claude/skills/<name>/SKILL.md`,
so any Claude Code session in the repo picks them up automatically.
### 3.4 doc-agent (Claude Agent SDK)
A TypeScript application at [.github/scripts/doc-agent/](.github/scripts/doc-agent/),
built on `@anthropic-ai/claude-agent-sdk`. Three modes:
| Mode | Purpose |
|------|---------|
| `document` | Add Doxygen comments to a file or directory. Reads sibling `<file>.ai.md` context, the module skill, and the source file; uses `permissionMode: 'acceptEdits'` to write directly. |
| `review` | Given a git range or PR number, detect doc drift. Emits `doc-review-report.md` (sticky comment) and `doc-review-comments.json` (inline comments). |
| `regen-skills` | Rebuild a module's skill file at `docs/skills/<module>.md` from the module's `.ai.md` files plus existing skill content. |
Layout:
```
doc-agent/
├── package.json # Node >= 20.12, @anthropic-ai/claude-agent-sdk
├── biome.json # lint + format
├── install-skills.sh # copies docs/skills/*.md → .claude/skills/*/SKILL.md
├── prompts/ # System prompts as markdown (editable without code changes)
│ ├── document-file.md
│ ├── review-diff.md
│ └── regen-skill.md
└── src/
├── index.ts # CLI entry (document | review | regen-skills)
├── config.ts # Paths, model, MODULE_SKILL_MAP
├── prompt-loader.ts # Loads prompts + injects module skill
├── document.ts
├── review.ts
├── regen-skills.ts
└── types.ts
```
Notable design decisions:
- **Prompts as markdown, not strings.** Operators tune prompts without
touching TypeScript or redeploying.
- **`.ai.md` sidecar input.** When documenting a file, the agent reads a
sibling `<file>.ai.md` (high-signal prose generated upstream by the
`athenah-ai` pipeline) as the authoritative source of intent. These are
gitignored (`*.ai.md` in [.gitignore](.gitignore)) and discarded once
the initial pass is complete.
- **Model selection via env.** `DOC_AGENT_MODEL` env var; default
`claude-sonnet-4-6`.
- **Repo root override.** `XRPLD_ROOT` env var allows running the agent
against a different checkout (useful in CI and local testing).
### 3.5 Documentation Coverage Pipeline
| File | Purpose |
|------|---------|
| [.github/doc-coverage-thresholds.json](.github/doc-coverage-thresholds.json) | Per-module thresholds + quarterly ratchet schedule |
| [.github/scripts/doc-coverage-check.py](.github/scripts/doc-coverage-check.py) | Parses coverxygen LCOV, checks thresholds, generates PR report |
| [.github/workflows/doc-coverage.yml](.github/workflows/doc-coverage.yml) | CI workflow: builds Doxygen XML, runs coverxygen, posts coverage to PR |
| [cmake/XrplDocs.cmake](cmake/XrplDocs.cmake) | `docs` CMake target wiring |
Flow:
1. On every PR touching C++ files, the workflow builds Doxygen XML for
both the PR branch and the base branch (using
`ghcr.io/xrplf/ci/tools-rippled-documentation`).
2. Coverxygen generates LCOV-format coverage from the XML.
3. The check script compares coverage against per-module thresholds.
4. Ratchet mode (`no_decrease`) prevents any PR from reducing coverage.
5. New files added in a PR require ≥ 80% doc coverage.
6. Results are posted as a sticky PR comment with per-module breakdown.
### 3.6 Doc-Review GitHub Action
| File | Purpose |
|------|---------|
| [.github/workflows/doc-review.yml](.github/workflows/doc-review.yml) | CI workflow: runs on PR, posts review |
The workflow invokes the doc-agent `review` mode (Section 3.4) directly —
there is no separate CI script. The same code path serves CI and local use,
so prompt and logic changes are tested in one place.
Flow:
1. On every PR, the workflow runs `npm run review -- "$BASE..$HEAD"` in the
doc-agent directory.
2. doc-agent enumerates C++ files changed in the range, extracts diff
hunks plus existing doc comments, and asks Claude per file whether the
docs are still accurate.
3. Outputs `doc-review-report.md` (sticky PR comment) and
`doc-review-comments.json` (inline review comments via
`actions/github-script`).
4. Runs in **warning-only mode** — does not block merge.
Local invocation uses the same command:
`npm run review develop..HEAD` or `npm run review -- --pr 1234`.
Cost: only changed files and changed hunks within those files are
processed. Estimated ~$0.050.15 per PR.
### 3.7 Claude Code Slash Commands
Four developer-facing commands in [.claude/commands/](.claude/commands/):
| Command | Purpose |
|---------|---------|
| [doc-review](.claude/commands/doc-review.md) | Review doc accuracy for files changed on current branch |
| [explain-module](.claude/commands/explain-module.md) | Explain a module's architecture, classes, control flow, entry points |
| [how-does-x-work](.claude/commands/how-does-x-work.md) | Trace a feature through the codebase with file/line references |
| [find-bug-patterns](.claude/commands/find-bug-patterns.md) | Scan code for common xrpld bug patterns (unchecked TER, integer overflow, missing amendment gates, etc.) |
### 3.8 Full Codebase Documentation
The initial documentation pass covers 1,183 C++ files organized into 21
module-level PRs (see Section 5). The doc-agent `document` mode produces
each PR in parallel across modules; each file's output is then
domain-expert reviewed before merge.
## 4. Resources Required
### 4.1 People
| Role | Responsibility |
|------|---------------|
| **Documentation lead** | Runs `doc-agent document` per module, reviews output, submits PRs, iterates on prompts in [prompts/](.github/scripts/doc-agent/prompts/) |
| **Domain reviewers** (rotating) | Review doc PRs for semantic accuracy in their area of expertise |
| **CI/infrastructure** | Deploys workflows, monitors costs, tunes false-positive rate on doc-review action |
### 4.2 Infrastructure & Tools
| Resource | Purpose |
|----------|---------|
| **Anthropic API access** | Powers the doc-agent (`document`, `review`, `regen-skills`) and the doc-review GitHub Action |
| **Claude Agent SDK** | `@anthropic-ai/claude-agent-sdk` Node package |
| **Node.js >= 20.12** | Native `--env-file` support; runs the doc-agent |
| **GitHub Actions minutes** | Doc-coverage workflow (Doxygen XML build + coverxygen) and doc-review workflow |
| **Coverxygen** | Python package, open source (MIT) |
| **Doxygen** | Already configured — uses existing `ghcr.io/xrplf/ci/tools-rippled-documentation` container |
| **GitHub Actions secret** | `ANTHROPIC_API_KEY` — for doc-review workflow |
| **athenah-ai pipeline output** | Generates `.ai.md` sidecar context files consumed by `doc-agent document`; gitignored, removed post-pass |
### 4.3 Access & Permissions
- Write access to the `rippled` repository (or a fork for initial PRs)
- Ability to add GitHub Actions secrets (`ANTHROPIC_API_KEY`)
- Ability to modify required status checks (when promoting doc-review from
warning to required)
## 5. Execution Plan
Module passes run in parallel — the doc-agent operates per-module
independently, so foundation, protocol, and application layers are
generated concurrently rather than sequentially. Module groupings below
reflect dependency layering for review purposes, not a serial schedule.
### Phase 0: Infrastructure — Complete
Tooling shipped as the foundation PR:
- [x] [docs/DOCUMENTATION_STANDARDS.md](docs/DOCUMENTATION_STANDARDS.md)
- [x] [docs/Doxyfile](docs/Doxyfile) modifications
- [x] [docs/skills/](docs/skills/) — 13 module skills + index
- [x] [.github/scripts/doc-agent/](.github/scripts/doc-agent/) — Agent SDK app (document / review / regen-skills)
- [x] [.github/scripts/doc-agent/install-skills.sh](.github/scripts/doc-agent/install-skills.sh)
- [x] [.github/doc-coverage-thresholds.json](.github/doc-coverage-thresholds.json)
- [x] [.github/scripts/doc-coverage-check.py](.github/scripts/doc-coverage-check.py)
- [x] [.github/workflows/doc-coverage.yml](.github/workflows/doc-coverage.yml)
- [x] [cmake/XrplDocs.cmake](cmake/XrplDocs.cmake)
- [x] [.github/workflows/doc-review.yml](.github/workflows/doc-review.yml) — invokes doc-agent `review` mode directly
- [x] [.claude/commands/](.claude/commands/) — 4 developer slash commands
**Exit criteria met:** All workflows pass on a test PR. Coverage report
renders correctly. Doc-review action posts comments without false positives
on a sample PR.
### Phase 1: Foundation Modules
Lowest-level modules — everything else depends on these:
| PR | Module | ~Files | ~Lines |
|----|--------|--------|--------|
| 1 | `include/xrpl/basics/` + `src/libxrpl/basics/` | 63 | ~15K |
| 2 | `include/xrpl/crypto/` + `src/libxrpl/crypto/` | 6 | ~1.5K |
| 3 | `include/xrpl/json/` + `src/libxrpl/json/` | 18 | ~4K |
| 4 | `include/xrpl/beast/` + `src/libxrpl/beast/` | 88 | ~20K |
**Process per PR:**
1. Create branch `docs/module-<name>` from `develop`.
2. Run `npm run document <path>` from `.github/scripts/doc-agent/`. The
agent reads each file's `.ai.md` sidecar, the matching module skill,
and the file itself, then writes Doxygen comments per the standards.
3. Domain expert reviews for semantic accuracy.
4. Run Doxygen build to validate no doc errors.
5. Merge; ratchet that module's threshold up to actual coverage level.
### Phase 2: Protocol & Transaction Engine
| PR | Module | ~Files |
|----|--------|--------|
| 5 | `include/xrpl/protocol/` + `src/libxrpl/protocol/` | 150 |
| 6 | `include/xrpl/ledger/` + `src/libxrpl/ledger/` | 68 |
| 7 | `include/xrpl/conditions/` + `src/libxrpl/conditions/` | 8 |
| 8 | `include/xrpl/tx/` (core framework: Transactor, ApplyContext) | 15 |
| 9 | Payment transactors | 9 |
| 10 | DEX/AMM transactors | 25 |
| 11 | Escrow transactors | 7 |
| 12 | Other transactors (NFT, token, vault, check, etc.) | 60 |
| 13 | Pathfinding + invariants | 30 |
### Phase 3: Server & Application Layer
| PR | Module | ~Files |
|----|--------|--------|
| 14 | `include/xrpl/server/` + `src/libxrpl/server/` | 35 |
| 15 | `include/xrpl/nodestore/` + `src/libxrpl/nodestore/` | 30 |
| 16 | SHAMap | 25 |
| 17 | Resource management | 17 |
| 18 | Overlay + peerfinder | 56 |
| 19 | Consensus | 15 |
| 20 | Application core (ledger, main, misc, rdb) | 133 |
| 21 | RPC handlers | 131 |
Once Phases 13 are merged, the doc-review action is promoted from
warning to a **required check**.
### Phase 4: Tests & Polish
- Document test files (brief docs only — test name + what it validates)
- Remove `.ai.md` sidecar files (they were transitional input only)
- Retrospective: false-positive rate, API costs, contributor feedback
## 6. Coverage Threshold Ratchet
Coverage thresholds are enforced per-module via
[.github/doc-coverage-thresholds.json](.github/doc-coverage-thresholds.json):
- **`no_decrease` ratchet** — no PR may reduce coverage on a module
below its current level.
- **New files** require ≥ 80% doc coverage regardless of module threshold.
- **Per-module floors** are raised manually as each module's PR lands,
pinning the achieved coverage as the new floor.
There is no calendar-based ratchet; thresholds advance with the work.
## 7. Risk Assessment
| Risk | Likelihood | Impact | Mitigation |
|------|-----------|--------|------------|
| LLM generates plausible but wrong docs | Medium | High | Every doc PR requires human domain expert review. `.ai.md` sidecars (athenah-ai) ground the agent in source-derived intent rather than free generation. |
| Doc-review action false positives annoy contributors | Medium | Medium | Warning-only mode initially. Promote to required only when FP rate < 5%. Prompts live in markdown ([prompts/](.github/scripts/doc-agent/prompts/)) and can be tuned without a code release. |
| Coverage enforcement blocks unrelated PRs | Low | Medium | `no_decrease` ratchet only; per-module floors raised manually as modules land. |
| Reviewer bandwidth bottleneck | Medium | Medium | PRs scoped to single modules. Reviewers rotate. |
| API costs exceed budget | Low | Low | Only diff hunks processed. Monthly budget cap with alerting. |
| Doxygen XML build adds CI time | Low | Low | Runs in parallel with existing checks. Uses existing documentation container. |
| Doc comments add code noise | Low | Low | Terse style enforced by standards. 25 lines per class, 13 per function. |
| Skill files drift from code | Medium | Medium | `doc-agent regen-skills <module>` rebuilds a skill from current `.ai.md` files; intended to be run periodically. |
## 8. Success Metrics
| Metric | Measurement |
|--------|-------------|
| Documentation coverage (public API) | Coverxygen LCOV reports in CI |
| Doc drift catch rate | Sample audit of merged PRs vs doc-review output |
| False positive rate (doc-review action) | Track dismissed vs accepted suggestions |
| Spec-vs-code contradictions | Bug reports citing wrong documentation |
| Contributor satisfaction | Periodic survey: "docs helped me understand the code" |
| Onboarding time | Measure across new contributors before/after |
| API cost | Anthropic API billing dashboard |
## 9. What This Replaces
This system does **not** replace the Common Prefix formal verification
work directly formal verification and code documentation solve different
problems. However, it eliminates the need for an external specification as
the "source of truth" for how xrpld behaves:
| Need | Before | After |
|------|--------|-------|
| "What does this function do?" | Read the code, guess | Read the inline Doxygen doc |
| "How does the payment engine work?" | Read Common Prefix spec (maybe stale) | Read [docs/skills/transactors.md](docs/skills/transactors.md) or run `/explain-module` |
| "Did this PR break any documented behavior?" | Manual review, hope someone notices | Doc-review action flags it automatically |
| "What's our documentation coverage?" | Unknown | Measured per-module in every PR |
| "Is the spec up to date?" | Check manually, probably not | Docs are in-repo, enforced by CI |
| "Where do I start in module X?" | Ask in chat | Read the module skill in [docs/skills/](docs/skills/) |
## 10. Out of Scope
- **Formal verification.** This project documents code behavior; it does
not prove correctness. Formal verification is a separate discipline.
- **External-facing API documentation.** This covers the C++ source code,
not the JSON-RPC API documentation on xrpl.org.
- **Test coverage.** Test file documentation is brief and optional. Test
coverage measurement is handled by existing Codecov integration.
- **Architectural decision records.** Module-level READMEs already exist
for key subsystems. This project adds function/class-level docs and the
module skills layer, not system-level ADRs.

View File

@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
#!/bin/bash
if [[ $# -ne 1 || "$1" == "--help" || "$1" == "-h" ]]; then
name=$(basename $0)
cat <<-USAGE
name=$( basename $0 )
cat <<- USAGE
Usage: $name <username>
Where <username> is the Github username of the upstream repo. e.g. XRPLF
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ fi
shift
user="$1"
# Get the origin URL. Expect it be an SSH-style URL
origin=$(git remote get-url origin)
origin=$( git remote get-url origin )
if [[ "${origin}" == "" ]]; then
echo Invalid origin remote >&2
exit 1
@@ -22,11 +22,11 @@ fi
# echo "Origin: ${origin}"
# Parse the origin
ifs_orig="${IFS}"
IFS=':' read remote originpath <<<"${origin}"
IFS=':' read remote originpath <<< "${origin}"
# echo "Remote: ${remote}, Originpath: ${originpath}"
IFS='@' read sshuser server <<<"${remote}"
IFS='@' read sshuser server <<< "${remote}"
# echo "SSHUser: ${sshuser}, Server: ${server}"
IFS='/' read originuser repo <<<"${originpath}"
IFS='/' read originuser repo <<< "${originpath}"
# echo "Originuser: ${originuser}, Repo: ${repo}"
if [[ "${sshuser}" == "" || "${server}" == "" || "${originuser}" == "" || "${repo}" == "" ]]; then
echo "Can't parse origin URL: ${origin}" >&2
@@ -35,9 +35,9 @@ fi
upstream="https://${server}/${user}/${repo}"
upstreampush="${remote}:${user}/${repo}"
upstreamgroup="upstream upstream-push"
current=$(git remote get-url upstream 2>/dev/null)
currentpush=$(git remote get-url upstream-push 2>/dev/null)
currentgroup=$(git config remotes.upstreams)
current=$( git remote get-url upstream 2>/dev/null )
currentpush=$( git remote get-url upstream-push 2>/dev/null )
currentgroup=$( git config remotes.upstreams )
if [[ "${current}" == "${upstream}" ]]; then
echo "Upstream already set up correctly. Skip"
elif [[ -n "${current}" && "${current}" != "${upstream}" && "${current}" != "${upstreampush}" ]]; then
@@ -45,9 +45,9 @@ elif [[ -n "${current}" && "${current}" != "${upstream}" && "${current}" != "${u
else
if [[ "${current}" == "${upstreampush}" ]]; then
echo "Upstream set to dangerous push URL. Update."
_run git remote rename upstream upstream-push ||
_run git remote remove upstream
currentpush=$(git remote get-url upstream-push 2>/dev/null)
_run git remote rename upstream upstream-push || \
_run git remote remove upstream
currentpush=$( git remote get-url upstream-push 2>/dev/null )
fi
_run git remote add upstream "${upstream}"
fi

View File

@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
#!/bin/bash
if [[ $# -lt 3 || "$1" == "--help" || "$1" = "-h" ]]; then
name=$(basename $0)
cat <<-USAGE
name=$( basename $0 )
cat <<- USAGE
Usage: $name workbranch base/branch user/branch [user/branch [...]]
* workbranch will be created locally from base/branch
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ fi
work="$1"
shift
branches=($(echo "${@}" | sed "s/:/\//"))
branches=( $( echo "${@}" | sed "s/:/\//" ) )
base="${branches[0]}"
unset branches[0]
@@ -24,10 +24,10 @@ set -e
users=()
for b in "${branches[@]}"; do
users+=($(echo $b | cut -d/ -f1))
users+=( $( echo $b | cut -d/ -f1 ) )
done
users=($(printf '%s\n' "${users[@]}" | sort -u))
users=( $( printf '%s\n' "${users[@]}" | sort -u ) )
git fetch --multiple upstreams "${users[@]}"
git checkout -B "$work" --no-track "$base"
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ done
# Make sure the commits look right
git log --show-signature "$base..HEAD"
parts=($(echo $base | sed "s/\// /"))
parts=( $( echo $base | sed "s/\// /" ) )
repo="${parts[0]}"
b="${parts[1]}"
push=$repo
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ fi
if [[ "$repo" == "upstream" ]]; then
repo="upstreams"
fi
cat <<PUSH
cat << PUSH
-------------------------------------------------------------------
This script will not push. Verify everything is correct, then push

View File

@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
#!/bin/bash
if [[ $# -ne 3 || "$1" == "--help" || "$1" = "-h" ]]; then
name=$(basename $0)
cat <<-USAGE
name=$( basename $0 )
cat <<- USAGE
Usage: $name workbranch base/branch version
* workbranch will be created locally from base/branch. If it exists,
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ fi
work="$1"
shift
base=$(echo "$1" | sed "s/:/\//")
base=$( echo "$1" | sed "s/:/\//" )
shift
version=$1
@@ -28,16 +28,16 @@ git fetch upstreams
git checkout -B "${work}" --no-track "${base}"
push=$(git rev-parse --abbrev-ref --symbolic-full-name '@{push}' \
2>/dev/null) || true
push=$( git rev-parse --abbrev-ref --symbolic-full-name '@{push}' \
2>/dev/null ) || true
if [[ "${push}" != "" ]]; then
echo "Warning: ${push} may already exist."
fi
build=$(find -name BuildInfo.cpp)
sed 's/\(^.*versionString =\).*$/\1 "'${version}'"/' ${build} >version.cpp &&
diff "${build}" version.cpp && exit 1 ||
mv -vi version.cpp ${build}
build=$( find -name BuildInfo.cpp )
sed 's/\(^.*versionString =\).*$/\1 "'${version}'"/' ${build} > version.cpp && \
diff "${build}" version.cpp && exit 1 || \
mv -vi version.cpp ${build}
git diff
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ git commit -S -m "Set version to ${version}"
git log --oneline --first-parent ${base}^..
cat <<PUSH
cat << PUSH
-------------------------------------------------------------------
This script will not push. Verify everything is correct, then push

View File

@@ -168,13 +168,7 @@ def main():
if not os.environ.get("TIDY"):
return 0
repo_root = Path(
subprocess.check_output(
["git", "rev-parse", "--show-toplevel"],
cwd=Path(__file__).parent,
text=True,
).strip()
)
repo_root = Path(__file__).parent.parent
files = staged_files(repo_root)
if not files:
return 0

View File

@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
# https://vl.ripple.com
# https://unl.xrplf.org
# http://127.0.0.1:8000
# file:///etc/xrpld/vl.txt
# file:///etc/opt/xrpld/vl.txt
#
# [validator_list_keys]
#

View File

@@ -527,17 +527,6 @@
#
# The current default (which is subject to change) is 300 seconds.
#
# verify_endpoints = <0 | 1>
#
# If set to 0, the server will skip validation of endpoint
# addresses received in TMEndpoints peer protocol messages,
# allowing addresses that are not publicly routable or have a
# port of 0. The default is 1 (verification enabled).
#
# WARNING: Disabling this option is a security risk and should
# only be used for local testing and debugging. Do not disable
# on mainnet.
#
#
# [transaction_queue] EXPERIMENTAL
#
@@ -953,21 +942,6 @@
#
# Optional keys for NuDB and RocksDB:
#
# cache_size Size of cache for database records. Default is 16384.
# Setting this value to 0 will use the default value.
#
# cache_age Length of time in minutes to keep database records
# cached. Default is 5 minutes. Setting this value to
# 0 will use the default value.
#
# Note: if cache_size or cache_age is not specified,
# default values will be used for the unspecified
# parameter.
#
# Note: the cache will not be created if online_delete
# is specified, because the rotating NodeStore does
# not use this cache).
#
# fast_load Boolean. If set, load the last persisted ledger
# from disk upon process start before syncing to
# the network. This is likely to improve performance
@@ -1481,7 +1455,10 @@ admin = 127.0.0.1
protocol = http
[port_peer]
port = 2459
# Many servers still use the legacy port of 51235, so for backward-compatibility
# we maintain that port number here. However, for new servers we recommend
# changing this to the default port of 2459.
port = 51235
ip = 0.0.0.0
# alternatively, to accept connections on IPv4 + IPv6, use:
#ip = ::
@@ -1621,97 +1598,3 @@ validators.txt
# set to ssl_verify to 0.
[ssl_verify]
1
#-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#
# 11. Telemetry (OpenTelemetry Tracing)
#
#-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#
# Enables distributed tracing via OpenTelemetry. Requires building with
# -DXRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY=ON (telemetry Conan option).
#
# [telemetry]
#
# enabled=0
#
# Enable or disable telemetry at runtime. Default: 0 (disabled).
#
# service_name=xrpld
#
# OTel resource attribute `service.name`. Default: xrpld.
# The node's network ID (from [network_id]) is automatically added
# as the `xrpl.network.id` and `xrpl.network.type` resource attributes.
#
# service_instance_id=<node_public_key>
#
# OTel resource attribute `service.instance.id`. Uniquely identifies
# this node. Default: the node's public key (auto-detected).
#
# endpoint=http://localhost:4318/v1/traces
#
# The OTLP/HTTP exporter endpoint. The server sends trace data as
# protobuf-encoded HTTP POST requests to this URL.
# Default: http://localhost:4318/v1/traces.
#
# --- TLS settings for the OTLP exporter connection ---
#
# use_tls=0
#
# Enable TLS for the OTLP/HTTP exporter connection. Default: 0 (off).
#
# tls_ca_cert=
#
# Path to a PEM-encoded CA certificate bundle for TLS verification.
# Only used when use_tls=1. Default: empty (system CA store).
#
# sampling_ratio=1.0
#
# Head-based sampling ratio using TraceIdRatioBasedSampler. The decision
# to record or drop a trace is made at span creation time, before the
# span starts, based on the trace ID. Values in [0.0, 1.0].
# 1.0 = trace everything, 0.1 = sample ~10% of traces. Default: 1.0.
# For tail-based (post-hoc) filtering — where you decide to drop a span
# after inspecting its content — use SpanGuard::discard() in code.
#
# trace_rpc=1
#
# Enable tracing for JSON-RPC and WebSocket API request handling —
# command parsing, execution, and response serialization. Default: 1.
#
# trace_transactions=1
#
# Enable tracing for the transaction lifecycle — submission, validation,
# application to ledgers, and final disposition. Default: 1.
#
# trace_consensus=1
#
# Enable tracing for the consensus round lifecycle — proposals,
# validations, mode changes, and ledger acceptance. Default: 1.
#
# trace_peer=0
#
# Enable tracing for peer-to-peer protocol messages — overlay message
# send/receive, peer handshakes, and routing. High volume; disabled
# by default. Default: 0.
#
# trace_ledger=1
#
# Enable tracing for ledger close and accept operations — ledger
# building, state hashing, and write-back to the node store. Default: 1.
#
# --- Batch processor tuning ---
#
# batch_size=512
#
# Maximum number of spans exported in a single batch. Default: 512.
#
# batch_delay_ms=5000
#
# Maximum delay (milliseconds) before a partial batch is flushed.
# Default: 5000 (5 seconds).
#
# max_queue_size=2048
#
# Maximum number of spans queued in memory before drops occur.
# Default: 2048.
#

View File

@@ -189,28 +189,8 @@ target_link_libraries(
xrpl.libxrpl.conditions
)
# Telemetry module — OpenTelemetry distributed tracing support.
# Sources: include/xrpl/telemetry/ (headers), src/libxrpl/telemetry/ (impl).
# When telemetry=ON, links the Conan-provided umbrella target
# opentelemetry-cpp::opentelemetry-cpp (individual component targets like
# ::api, ::sdk are not available in the Conan package).
add_module(xrpl telemetry)
target_link_libraries(
xrpl.libxrpl.telemetry
PUBLIC xrpl.libxrpl.basics xrpl.libxrpl.beast
)
if(telemetry)
target_link_libraries(
xrpl.libxrpl.telemetry
PUBLIC opentelemetry-cpp::opentelemetry-cpp
)
endif()
add_module(xrpl tx)
target_link_libraries(
xrpl.libxrpl.tx
PUBLIC xrpl.libxrpl.ledger xrpl.libxrpl.telemetry
)
target_link_libraries(xrpl.libxrpl.tx PUBLIC xrpl.libxrpl.ledger)
add_library(xrpl.libxrpl)
set_target_properties(xrpl.libxrpl PROPERTIES OUTPUT_NAME xrpl)
@@ -243,7 +223,6 @@ target_link_modules(
resource
server
shamap
telemetry
tx
)

View File

@@ -89,3 +89,30 @@ add_custom_target(
DEPENDS "${doxygen_index_file}"
SOURCES "${dependencies}"
)
# Documentation coverage target using coverxygen.
# Generates LCOV-format coverage report from Doxygen XML output.
# Requires: pip install coverxygen
set(doxygen_xml_dir "${doxygen_output_directory}/xml")
set(doc_coverage_file "${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/doc-coverage.info")
add_custom_command(
OUTPUT "${doc_coverage_file}"
COMMAND
coverxygen
--xml-dir "${doxygen_xml_dir}"
--src-dir "${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}"
--output "${doc_coverage_file}"
--kind class,struct,function,enum,typedef,variable
--scope public
WORKING_DIRECTORY "${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}"
DEPENDS docs
COMMENT "Generating documentation coverage report"
)
add_custom_target(
docs-coverage
DEPENDS "${doc_coverage_file}"
COMMAND
"${CMAKE_COMMAND}" -E echo
"Documentation coverage report: ${doc_coverage_file}"
)

View File

@@ -1,44 +0,0 @@
#[===================================================================[
Linux packaging support: 'package' target.
The packaging script (package/build_pkg.sh) installs to FHS-standard
paths (/usr/bin, /etc/xrpld, etc.) regardless of CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX,
so no prefix guard is needed here.
#]===================================================================]
if(NOT is_linux)
message(STATUS "Packaging not supported on non-Linux hosts")
return()
endif()
if(NOT DEFINED pkg_release)
set(pkg_release 1)
endif()
find_program(RPMBUILD_EXECUTABLE rpmbuild)
find_program(DPKG_BUILDPACKAGE_EXECUTABLE dpkg-buildpackage)
if(NOT (RPMBUILD_EXECUTABLE OR DPKG_BUILDPACKAGE_EXECUTABLE))
message(
STATUS
"Neither rpmbuild nor dpkg-buildpackage found; 'package' target not available"
)
return()
endif()
set(package_env
SRC_DIR=${CMAKE_SOURCE_DIR}
BUILD_DIR=${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}
PKG_VERSION=${xrpld_version}
PKG_RELEASE=${pkg_release}
)
add_custom_target(
package
COMMAND
${CMAKE_COMMAND} -E env ${package_env}
${CMAKE_SOURCE_DIR}/package/build_pkg.sh
WORKING_DIRECTORY ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}
DEPENDS xrpld
COMMENT "Building Linux package (deb/rpm inferred from host tooling)"
VERBATIM
)

View File

@@ -1,13 +0,0 @@
# Python dependencies for XRP Ledger code generation scripts
#
# These packages are required to run the code generation scripts that
# parse macro files and generate C++ wrapper classes.
# C preprocessor for Python - used to preprocess macro files
pcpp>=1.30
# Parser combinator library - used to parse the macro DSL
pyparsing>=3.0.0
# Template engine - used to generate C++ code from templates
Mako>=1.2.2

View File

@@ -1,105 +1,13 @@
# This file was autogenerated by uv via the following command:
# uv pip compile requirements.in --generate-hashes --output-file requirements.txt
mako==1.3.12 \
--hash=sha256:8f61569480282dbf557145ce441e4ba888be453c30989f879f0d652e39f53ea9 \
--hash=sha256:9f778e93289bd410bb35daadeb4fc66d95a746f0b75777b942088b7fd7af550a
# via -r requirements.in
markupsafe==3.0.3 \
--hash=sha256:0303439a41979d9e74d18ff5e2dd8c43ed6c6001fd40e5bf2e43f7bd9bbc523f \
--hash=sha256:068f375c472b3e7acbe2d5318dea141359e6900156b5b2ba06a30b169086b91a \
--hash=sha256:0bf2a864d67e76e5c9a34dc26ec616a66b9888e25e7b9460e1c76d3293bd9dbf \
--hash=sha256:0db14f5dafddbb6d9208827849fad01f1a2609380add406671a26386cdf15a19 \
--hash=sha256:0eb9ff8191e8498cca014656ae6b8d61f39da5f95b488805da4bb029cccbfbaf \
--hash=sha256:0f4b68347f8c5eab4a13419215bdfd7f8c9b19f2b25520968adfad23eb0ce60c \
--hash=sha256:1085e7fbddd3be5f89cc898938f42c0b3c711fdcb37d75221de2666af647c175 \
--hash=sha256:116bb52f642a37c115f517494ea5feb03889e04df47eeff5b130b1808ce7c219 \
--hash=sha256:12c63dfb4a98206f045aa9563db46507995f7ef6d83b2f68eda65c307c6829eb \
--hash=sha256:133a43e73a802c5562be9bbcd03d090aa5a1fe899db609c29e8c8d815c5f6de6 \
--hash=sha256:1353ef0c1b138e1907ae78e2f6c63ff67501122006b0f9abad68fda5f4ffc6ab \
--hash=sha256:15d939a21d546304880945ca1ecb8a039db6b4dc49b2c5a400387cdae6a62e26 \
--hash=sha256:177b5253b2834fe3678cb4a5f0059808258584c559193998be2601324fdeafb1 \
--hash=sha256:1872df69a4de6aead3491198eaf13810b565bdbeec3ae2dc8780f14458ec73ce \
--hash=sha256:1b4b79e8ebf6b55351f0d91fe80f893b4743f104bff22e90697db1590e47a218 \
--hash=sha256:1b52b4fb9df4eb9ae465f8d0c228a00624de2334f216f178a995ccdcf82c4634 \
--hash=sha256:1ba88449deb3de88bd40044603fafffb7bc2b055d626a330323a9ed736661695 \
--hash=sha256:1cc7ea17a6824959616c525620e387f6dd30fec8cb44f649e31712db02123dad \
--hash=sha256:218551f6df4868a8d527e3062d0fb968682fe92054e89978594c28e642c43a73 \
--hash=sha256:26a5784ded40c9e318cfc2bdb30fe164bdb8665ded9cd64d500a34fb42067b1c \
--hash=sha256:2713baf880df847f2bece4230d4d094280f4e67b1e813eec43b4c0e144a34ffe \
--hash=sha256:2a15a08b17dd94c53a1da0438822d70ebcd13f8c3a95abe3a9ef9f11a94830aa \
--hash=sha256:2f981d352f04553a7171b8e44369f2af4055f888dfb147d55e42d29e29e74559 \
--hash=sha256:32001d6a8fc98c8cb5c947787c5d08b0a50663d139f1305bac5885d98d9b40fa \
--hash=sha256:3524b778fe5cfb3452a09d31e7b5adefeea8c5be1d43c4f810ba09f2ceb29d37 \
--hash=sha256:3537e01efc9d4dccdf77221fb1cb3b8e1a38d5428920e0657ce299b20324d758 \
--hash=sha256:35add3b638a5d900e807944a078b51922212fb3dedb01633a8defc4b01a3c85f \
--hash=sha256:38664109c14ffc9e7437e86b4dceb442b0096dfe3541d7864d9cbe1da4cf36c8 \
--hash=sha256:3a7e8ae81ae39e62a41ec302f972ba6ae23a5c5396c8e60113e9066ef893da0d \
--hash=sha256:3b562dd9e9ea93f13d53989d23a7e775fdfd1066c33494ff43f5418bc8c58a5c \
--hash=sha256:457a69a9577064c05a97c41f4e65148652db078a3a509039e64d3467b9e7ef97 \
--hash=sha256:4bd4cd07944443f5a265608cc6aab442e4f74dff8088b0dfc8238647b8f6ae9a \
--hash=sha256:4e885a3d1efa2eadc93c894a21770e4bc67899e3543680313b09f139e149ab19 \
--hash=sha256:4faffd047e07c38848ce017e8725090413cd80cbc23d86e55c587bf979e579c9 \
--hash=sha256:509fa21c6deb7a7a273d629cf5ec029bc209d1a51178615ddf718f5918992ab9 \
--hash=sha256:5678211cb9333a6468fb8d8be0305520aa073f50d17f089b5b4b477ea6e67fdc \
--hash=sha256:591ae9f2a647529ca990bc681daebdd52c8791ff06c2bfa05b65163e28102ef2 \
--hash=sha256:5a7d5dc5140555cf21a6fefbdbf8723f06fcd2f63ef108f2854de715e4422cb4 \
--hash=sha256:69c0b73548bc525c8cb9a251cddf1931d1db4d2258e9599c28c07ef3580ef354 \
--hash=sha256:6b5420a1d9450023228968e7e6a9ce57f65d148ab56d2313fcd589eee96a7a50 \
--hash=sha256:722695808f4b6457b320fdc131280796bdceb04ab50fe1795cd540799ebe1698 \
--hash=sha256:729586769a26dbceff69f7a7dbbf59ab6572b99d94576a5592625d5b411576b9 \
--hash=sha256:77f0643abe7495da77fb436f50f8dab76dbc6e5fd25d39589a0f1fe6548bfa2b \
--hash=sha256:795e7751525cae078558e679d646ae45574b47ed6e7771863fcc079a6171a0fc \
--hash=sha256:7be7b61bb172e1ed687f1754f8e7484f1c8019780f6f6b0786e76bb01c2ae115 \
--hash=sha256:7c3fb7d25180895632e5d3148dbdc29ea38ccb7fd210aa27acbd1201a1902c6e \
--hash=sha256:7e68f88e5b8799aa49c85cd116c932a1ac15caaa3f5db09087854d218359e485 \
--hash=sha256:83891d0e9fb81a825d9a6d61e3f07550ca70a076484292a70fde82c4b807286f \
--hash=sha256:8485f406a96febb5140bfeca44a73e3ce5116b2501ac54fe953e488fb1d03b12 \
--hash=sha256:8709b08f4a89aa7586de0aadc8da56180242ee0ada3999749b183aa23df95025 \
--hash=sha256:8f71bc33915be5186016f675cd83a1e08523649b0e33efdb898db577ef5bb009 \
--hash=sha256:915c04ba3851909ce68ccc2b8e2cd691618c4dc4c4232fb7982bca3f41fd8c3d \
--hash=sha256:949b8d66bc381ee8b007cd945914c721d9aba8e27f71959d750a46f7c282b20b \
--hash=sha256:94c6f0bb423f739146aec64595853541634bde58b2135f27f61c1ffd1cd4d16a \
--hash=sha256:9a1abfdc021a164803f4d485104931fb8f8c1efd55bc6b748d2f5774e78b62c5 \
--hash=sha256:9b79b7a16f7fedff2495d684f2b59b0457c3b493778c9eed31111be64d58279f \
--hash=sha256:a320721ab5a1aba0a233739394eb907f8c8da5c98c9181d1161e77a0c8e36f2d \
--hash=sha256:a4afe79fb3de0b7097d81da19090f4df4f8d3a2b3adaa8764138aac2e44f3af1 \
--hash=sha256:ad2cf8aa28b8c020ab2fc8287b0f823d0a7d8630784c31e9ee5edea20f406287 \
--hash=sha256:b8512a91625c9b3da6f127803b166b629725e68af71f8184ae7e7d54686a56d6 \
--hash=sha256:bc51efed119bc9cfdf792cdeaa4d67e8f6fcccab66ed4bfdd6bde3e59bfcbb2f \
--hash=sha256:bdc919ead48f234740ad807933cdf545180bfbe9342c2bb451556db2ed958581 \
--hash=sha256:bdd37121970bfd8be76c5fb069c7751683bdf373db1ed6c010162b2a130248ed \
--hash=sha256:be8813b57049a7dc738189df53d69395eba14fb99345e0a5994914a3864c8a4b \
--hash=sha256:c0c0b3ade1c0b13b936d7970b1d37a57acde9199dc2aecc4c336773e1d86049c \
--hash=sha256:c47a551199eb8eb2121d4f0f15ae0f923d31350ab9280078d1e5f12b249e0026 \
--hash=sha256:c4ffb7ebf07cfe8931028e3e4c85f0357459a3f9f9490886198848f4fa002ec8 \
--hash=sha256:ccfcd093f13f0f0b7fdd0f198b90053bf7b2f02a3927a30e63f3ccc9df56b676 \
--hash=sha256:d2ee202e79d8ed691ceebae8e0486bd9a2cd4794cec4824e1c99b6f5009502f6 \
--hash=sha256:d53197da72cc091b024dd97249dfc7794d6a56530370992a5e1a08983ad9230e \
--hash=sha256:d6dd0be5b5b189d31db7cda48b91d7e0a9795f31430b7f271219ab30f1d3ac9d \
--hash=sha256:d88b440e37a16e651bda4c7c2b930eb586fd15ca7406cb39e211fcff3bf3017d \
--hash=sha256:de8a88e63464af587c950061a5e6a67d3632e36df62b986892331d4620a35c01 \
--hash=sha256:df2449253ef108a379b8b5d6b43f4b1a8e81a061d6537becd5582fba5f9196d7 \
--hash=sha256:e1c1493fb6e50ab01d20a22826e57520f1284df32f2d8601fdd90b6304601419 \
--hash=sha256:e1cf1972137e83c5d4c136c43ced9ac51d0e124706ee1c8aa8532c1287fa8795 \
--hash=sha256:e2103a929dfa2fcaf9bb4e7c091983a49c9ac3b19c9061b6d5427dd7d14d81a1 \
--hash=sha256:e56b7d45a839a697b5eb268c82a71bd8c7f6c94d6fd50c3d577fa39a9f1409f5 \
--hash=sha256:e8afc3f2ccfa24215f8cb28dcf43f0113ac3c37c2f0f0806d8c70e4228c5cf4d \
--hash=sha256:e8fc20152abba6b83724d7ff268c249fa196d8259ff481f3b1476383f8f24e42 \
--hash=sha256:eaa9599de571d72e2daf60164784109f19978b327a3910d3e9de8c97b5b70cfe \
--hash=sha256:ec15a59cf5af7be74194f7ab02d0f59a62bdcf1a537677ce67a2537c9b87fcda \
--hash=sha256:f190daf01f13c72eac4efd5c430a8de82489d9cff23c364c3ea822545032993e \
--hash=sha256:f34c41761022dd093b4b6896d4810782ffbabe30f2d443ff5f083e0cbbb8c737 \
--hash=sha256:f3e98bb3798ead92273dc0e5fd0f31ade220f59a266ffd8a4f6065e0a3ce0523 \
--hash=sha256:f42d0984e947b8adf7dd6dde396e720934d12c506ce84eea8476409563607591 \
--hash=sha256:f71a396b3bf33ecaa1626c255855702aca4d3d9fea5e051b41ac59a9c1c41edc \
--hash=sha256:f9e130248f4462aaa8e2552d547f36ddadbeaa573879158d721bbd33dfe4743a \
--hash=sha256:fed51ac40f757d41b7c48425901843666a6677e3e8eb0abcff09e4ba6e664f50
# via mako
pcpp==1.30 \
--hash=sha256:05fe08292b6da57f385001c891a87f40d6aa7f46787b03e8ba326d20a3297c6e \
--hash=sha256:5af9fbce55f136d7931ae915fae03c34030a3b36c496e72d9636cedc8e2543a1
# via -r requirements.in
pyparsing==3.3.2 \
--hash=sha256:850ba148bd908d7e2411587e247a1e4f0327839c40e2e5e6d05a007ecc69911d \
--hash=sha256:c777f4d763f140633dcb6d8a3eda953bf7a214dc4eff598413c070bcdc117cbc
# via -r requirements.in
# Python dependencies for XRP Ledger code generation scripts
#
# These packages are required to run the code generation scripts that
# parse macro files and generate C++ wrapper classes.
# C preprocessor for Python - used to preprocess macro files
pcpp>=1.30
# Parser combinator library - used to parse the macro DSL
pyparsing>=3.0.0
# Template engine - used to generate C++ code from templates
Mako>=1.2.2

View File

@@ -1,24 +1,21 @@
{
"version": "0.5",
"requires": [
"zlib/1.3.2#1cb806da49011867778ffb6ac7190fcb%1778091116.056",
"zlib/1.3.2#1cb806da49011867778ffb6ac7190fcb%1777558780.503",
"xxhash/0.8.3#681d36a0a6111fc56e5e45ea182c19cc%1765850149.987",
"sqlite3/3.53.0#324ada52333108388a9a6108bfa96734%1778091117.311",
"sqlite3/3.53.0#324ada52333108388a9a6108bfa96734%1776096494.149",
"soci/4.0.3#fe32b9ad5eb47e79ab9e45a68f363945%1774450067.231",
"snappy/1.1.10#968fef506ff261592ec30c574d4a7809%1765850147.878",
"secp256k1/0.7.1#481881709eb0bdd0185a12b912bbe8ad%1770910500.329",
"rocksdb/10.5.1#4a197eca381a3e5ae8adf8cffa5aacd0%1765850186.86",
"re2/20251105#8579cfd0bda4daf0683f9e3898f964b4%1774398111.888",
"protobuf/6.33.5#d96d52ba5baaaa532f47bda866ad87a5%1774467363.12",
"opentelemetry-cpp/1.26.0#9d81768342c78cb897345fd419b358d2%1776934712.672",
"openssl/3.6.2#4789bbf131b77d0515d15e094c8f697f%1778071755.506",
"nudb/2.0.9#11149c73f8f2baff9a0198fe25971fc7%1775040983.408",
"nlohmann_json/3.11.3#45828be26eb619a2e04ca517bb7b828d%1701220705.259",
"lz4/1.10.0#59fc63cac7f10fbe8e05c7e62c2f3504%1765850143.914",
"libiconv/1.17#1e65319e945f2d31941a9d28cc13c058%1765842973.492",
"libcurl/8.20.0#465ac276192c197ddc6a9f4494004278%1779353234.048",
"libbacktrace/cci.20210118#a7691bfccd8caaf66309df196790a5a1%1765842973.03",
"libarchive/3.8.7#c446109bd1f1d8ba7936c94189bc50e6%1778091117.848",
"libarchive/3.8.7#c446109bd1f1d8ba7936c94189bc50e6%1776147552.838",
"jemalloc/5.3.1#1fc58d55316041f10fbc1e8a2eae632a%1776700028.228",
"gtest/1.17.0#5224b3b3ff3b4ce1133cbdd27d53ee7d%1768312129.152",
"grpc/1.78.1#b1a9e74b145cc471bed4dc64dc6eb2c1%1774467387.342",
@@ -26,22 +23,16 @@
"date/3.0.4#862e11e80030356b53c2c38599ceb32b%1765850143.772",
"c-ares/1.34.6#545240bb1c40e2cacd4362d6b8967650%1774439234.681",
"bzip2/1.0.8#c470882369c2d95c5c77e970c0c7e321%1765850143.837",
"boost/1.91.0#ea540ca2133d831b560036aa24dece3c%1778091165.282",
"boost/1.91.0#ea540ca2133d831b560036aa24dece3c%1778050991.9",
"abseil/20250127.0#bb0baf1f362bc4a725a24eddd419b8f7%1774365460.196"
],
"build_requires": [
"zlib/1.3.2#1cb806da49011867778ffb6ac7190fcb%1778091116.056",
"zlib/1.3.2#1cb806da49011867778ffb6ac7190fcb%1777558780.503",
"strawberryperl/5.32.1.1#8d114504d172cfea8ea1662d09b6333e%1774447376.964",
"protobuf/6.33.5#d96d52ba5baaaa532f47bda866ad87a5%1774467363.12",
"pkgconf/2.5.1#93c2051284cba1279494a43a4fcfeae2%1757684701.089",
"opentelemetry-proto/1.7.0#ed6d5bd761bef0afb0ba09676420b9ea%1749461220.268",
"ninja/1.13.2#c8c5dc2a52ed6e4e42a66d75b4717ceb%1764096931.974",
"nasm/2.16.01#31e26f2ee3c4346ecd347911bd126904%1765850144.707",
"msys2/cci.latest#d22fe7b2808f5fd34d0a7923ace9c54f%1770657326.649",
"meson/1.10.2#9d2d10681fe7fe61c788c58626c89b25%1775558003.754",
"m4/1.4.19#4523e4347b55cd26ae918bd5770cab9a%1778062762.471",
"libtool/2.4.7#14e7739cc128bc1623d2ed318008e47e%1755679003.847",
"gnu-config/cci.20210814#466e9d4d7779e1c142443f7ea44b4284%1762363589.329",
"cmake/4.3.0#b939a42e98f593fb34d3a8c5cc860359%1774439249.183",
"b2/5.4.2#ffd6084a119587e70f11cd45d1a386e2%1774439233.447",
"automake/1.16.5#b91b7c384c3deaa9d535be02da14d04f%1755524470.56",
@@ -67,9 +58,6 @@
],
"lz4/[>=1.9.4 <2]": [
"lz4/1.10.0#59fc63cac7f10fbe8e05c7e62c2f3504"
],
"protobuf/[>=4.25.3 <7]": [
"protobuf/6.33.5#d96d52ba5baaaa532f47bda866ad87a5"
]
},
"config_requires": []

View File

@@ -23,15 +23,3 @@ compiler.libcxx={{detect_api.detect_libcxx(compiler, version, compiler_exe)}}
{% if compiler == "gcc" and compiler_version < 13 %}
tools.build:cxxflags+=['-Wno-restrict']
{% endif %}
{% if os == "Windows" %}
# opentelemetry-cpp's recipe removes the `shared` option on Windows and never
# sets BUILD_SHARED_LIBS, so its upstream CMake defaults the protobuf-generated
# `opentelemetry_proto` target to a DLL (opentelemetry_proto.dll). The rest of
# the project links statically and nothing deploys that DLL next to the
# executables, so the telemetry unit test fails to start with
# STATUS_DLL_NOT_FOUND (0xC0000135). Force the dependency to build fully static
# so no runtime DLL is produced. The conf is folded into the package id so a
# fresh static binary is built instead of reusing a previously cached one.
opentelemetry-cpp/*:tools.cmake.cmaketoolchain:extra_variables={"BUILD_SHARED_LIBS": "OFF"}
opentelemetry-cpp/*:tools.info.package_id:confs+=["tools.cmake.cmaketoolchain:extra_variables"]
{% endif %}

View File

@@ -21,7 +21,6 @@ class Xrpl(ConanFile):
"rocksdb": [True, False],
"shared": [True, False],
"static": [True, False],
"telemetry": [True, False],
"tests": [True, False],
"unity": [True, False],
"xrpld": [True, False],
@@ -54,7 +53,6 @@ class Xrpl(ConanFile):
"rocksdb": True,
"shared": False,
"static": True,
"telemetry": True,
"tests": False,
"unity": False,
"xrpld": False,
@@ -141,10 +139,6 @@ class Xrpl(ConanFile):
self.requires("jemalloc/5.3.1")
if self.options.rocksdb:
self.requires("rocksdb/10.5.1")
# OpenTelemetry C++ SDK for distributed tracing (optional).
# Provides OTLP/HTTP exporter, batch span processor, and trace API.
if self.options.telemetry:
self.requires("opentelemetry-cpp/1.26.0")
self.requires("xxhash/0.8.3", transitive_headers=True)
exports_sources = (
@@ -173,7 +167,6 @@ class Xrpl(ConanFile):
tc.variables["rocksdb"] = self.options.rocksdb
tc.variables["BUILD_SHARED_LIBS"] = self.options.shared
tc.variables["static"] = self.options.static
tc.variables["telemetry"] = self.options.telemetry
tc.variables["unity"] = self.options.unity
tc.variables["xrpld"] = self.options.xrpld
tc.generate()
@@ -226,5 +219,3 @@ class Xrpl(ConanFile):
]
if self.options.rocksdb:
libxrpl.requires.append("rocksdb::librocksdb")
if self.options.telemetry:
libxrpl.requires.append("opentelemetry-cpp::opentelemetry-cpp")

View File

@@ -65,7 +65,6 @@ words:
- Btrfs
- Buildx
- canonicality
- CGNAT
- changespq
- checkme
- choco
@@ -94,23 +93,18 @@ words:
- daria
- dcmake
- dearmor
- dedented
- deleteme
- demultiplexer
- deserializaton
- desync
- desynced
- determ
- disablerepo
- distro
- doxyfile
- dxrpl
- enabled
- enablerepo
- endmacro
- exceptioned
- EXPECT_STREQ
- exfiltration
- Falco
- fcontext
- finalizers
@@ -118,8 +112,6 @@ words:
- fmtdur
- fsanitize
- funclets
- gantt
- Gantt
- gcov
- gcovr
- ghead
@@ -128,8 +120,6 @@ words:
- gpgcheck
- gpgkey
- hotwallet
- hicpp
- htpasswd
- hwaddress
- hwrap
- ifndef
@@ -167,11 +157,11 @@ words:
- mathbunnyru
- mcmodel
- MEMORYSTATUSEX
- MPTAMM
- MPTDEX
- Merkle
- Metafuncton
- misprediction
- missingok
- MPTAMM
- mptbalance
- MPTDEX
- mptflags
@@ -203,18 +193,12 @@ words:
- NOLINT
- NOLINTNEXTLINE
- nonxrp
- noreplace
- noripple
- nostd
- nostdinc
- notifempty
- nudb
- nullptr
- nunl
- Nyffenegger
- onlatest
- ostr
- otelc
- pargs
- partitioner
- paychan
@@ -222,7 +206,6 @@ words:
- permdex
- perminute
- permissioned
- pimpl
- pointee
- populator
- preauth
@@ -230,7 +213,6 @@ words:
- preauthorize
- preauthorizes
- preclaim
- preun
- protobuf
- protos
- ptrs
@@ -265,15 +247,12 @@ words:
- sfields
- shamap
- shamapitem
- shfmt
- shlibs
- sidechain
- SIGGOOD
- sle
- sles
- soci
- socidb
- SRPMS
- sslws
- statsd
- STATSDCOLLECTOR
@@ -293,7 +272,6 @@ words:
- takerpays
- ters
- TMEndpointv2
- traceql
- trixie
- tx
- txid
@@ -301,10 +279,9 @@ words:
- txjson
- txn
- txns
- txqueue
- txs
- ubsan
- UBSAN
- ubsan
- umant
- unacquired
- unambiguity
@@ -312,7 +289,6 @@ words:
- unauthorizing
- unergonomic
- unfetched
- unfindable
- unflatten
- unfund
- unimpair
@@ -342,6 +318,7 @@ words:
- xbridge
- xchain
- ximinez
- EXPECT_STREQ
- XMACRO
- xrpkuwait
- xrpl
@@ -349,7 +326,3 @@ words:
- xrplf
- xxhash
- xxhasher
- xychart
- zpages
- pratik
- dedup

View File

@@ -1,48 +0,0 @@
#!/bin/bash
# Sanity-check that the sanitizer runtimes shipped with g++/clang++ work
# end-to-end against the system loader: compile each example with both
# compilers, run it, and confirm the expected diagnostic is emitted.
set -eo pipefail
cpp_files_dir="${1:?usage: $0 <cpp_files_dir>}"
case "$(uname -m)" in
x86_64) loader=/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 ;;
aarch64) loader=/lib/ld-linux-aarch64.so.1 ;;
*)
echo "Unsupported arch: $(uname -m)" >&2
exit 1
;;
esac
declare -A sanitize=(
[asan]="-fsanitize=address"
[tsan]="-fsanitize=thread"
[ubsan]="-fsanitize=undefined"
)
declare -A expect=(
[asan]="heap-use-after-free"
[tsan]="data race"
[ubsan]="signed integer overflow"
)
for compiler in g++ clang++; do
for name in asan tsan ubsan; do
bin="/tmp/${name}-${compiler}"
echo "=== Build ${name} with ${compiler} ==="
"$compiler" -std=c++20 -O1 -g ${sanitize[$name]} \
-Wl,--dynamic-linker=$loader \
"${cpp_files_dir}/${name}.cpp" -o "$bin"
echo "=== Run ${name}-${compiler} ==="
output=$("$bin" 2>&1) || true
echo "$output"
echo "$output" | grep -q "${expect[$name]}" ||
{
echo "expected '${expect[$name]}' from $bin"
exit 1
}
rm -f "$bin"
done
done

View File

@@ -1,28 +0,0 @@
#include <atomic>
#include <cstddef>
#include <iostream>
#if defined(__clang__) || defined(__GNUC__)
__attribute__((noinline))
#elif defined(_MSC_VER)
__declspec(noinline)
#endif
int
read_after_free(volatile int* array, std::size_t index)
{
std::atomic_signal_fence(std::memory_order_seq_cst);
int value = array[index];
std::atomic_signal_fence(std::memory_order_seq_cst);
return value;
}
int
main()
{
int* array = new int[5]{10, 20, 30, 40, 50};
delete[] array;
std::cout << "Value at index 2: " << read_after_free(array, 2) << std::endl;
return 0;
}

View File

@@ -1,26 +0,0 @@
#include <iostream>
#include <thread>
static int kCounter = 0;
void
increment()
{
for (int i = 0; i < 100'000; ++i)
{
++kCounter;
}
}
int
main()
{
std::thread t1(increment);
std::thread t2(increment);
t1.join();
t2.join();
std::cout << "Final counter value: " << kCounter << std::endl;
return 0;
}

View File

@@ -1,13 +0,0 @@
#include <iostream>
#include <limits>
int
main()
{
int maxInt = std::numeric_limits<int>::max();
int volatile one = 1;
std::cout << "Current max: " << maxInt << std::endl;
int overflowed = maxInt + one;
std::cout << "Overflowed result: " << overflowed << std::endl;
return 0;
}

View File

@@ -45,30 +45,8 @@ COPY --from=builder /tmp/build/result /nix/ci-env
ENV PATH="/nix/ci-env/bin:$PATH"
# Externally-built dynamically-linked ELF binaries hard-code the loader path
# (e.g. /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2) in their PT_INTERP header. Copy the
# loader from the Nix store to that path when the base image doesn't already
# provide one (i.e. on nixos/nix).
RUN <<EOF
case "$(uname -m)" in
x86_64) target=/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 ;;
aarch64) target=/lib/ld-linux-aarch64.so.1 ;;
*) echo "Unsupported arch: $(uname -m)" >&2; exit 1 ;;
esac
if [ ! -e "$target" ]; then
# Use the loader from the same glibc that gcc links libc against, so
# ld-linux and libc/libpthread share GLIBC_PRIVATE symbols at runtime.
src="$(dirname "$(gcc -print-file-name=libc.so.6)")/$(basename "$target")"
[ -e "$src" ] || { echo "ld-linux not found at $src" >&2; exit 1; }
mkdir -p "$(dirname "$target")"
cp "$src" "$target"
fi
EOF
RUN <<EOF
ccache --version
clang --version
clang++ --version
clang-format --version
cmake --version
conan --version
@@ -86,10 +64,3 @@ python3 --version
run-clang-tidy --help
vim --version
EOF
# Sanity-check that the sanitizer runtimes shipped with g++/clang++ work
# end-to-end against the system loader.
COPY docker/cpp_files/ /tmp/cpp_files/
COPY docker/check-sanitizers.sh /tmp/check-sanitizers.sh
RUN grep -qi ubuntu /etc/os-release 2>/dev/null && /tmp/check-sanitizers.sh /tmp/cpp_files || true

View File

@@ -1,80 +0,0 @@
# Docker Compose stack for xrpld OpenTelemetry observability.
#
# Provides services for local development:
# - otel-collector: receives OTLP traces from xrpld, batches and
# forwards them to Tempo. Listens on ports 4317 (gRPC)
# and 4318 (HTTP).
# - tempo: Grafana Tempo tracing backend, queryable via Grafana Explore
# on port 3000. Recommended for production (S3/GCS storage, TraceQL).
# - grafana: dashboards on port 3000, pre-configured with Tempo
# datasource.
#
# Usage:
# docker compose -f docker/telemetry/docker-compose.yml up -d
#
# Configure xrpld to export traces by adding to xrpld.cfg:
# [telemetry]
# enabled=1
# endpoint=http://localhost:4318/v1/traces
services:
# OpenTelemetry Collector: receives spans from xrpld via OTLP protocol,
# batches them for efficiency, and forwards to Tempo for storage.
otel-collector:
image: otel/opentelemetry-collector-contrib:0.121.0
command: ["--config=/etc/otel-collector-config.yaml"]
ports:
- "4317:4317" # OTLP gRPC receiver
- "4318:4318" # OTLP HTTP receiver (xrpld sends traces here)
- "13133:13133" # Health check endpoint
volumes:
# Mount collector pipeline config (receivers → processors → exporters)
- ./otel-collector-config.yaml:/etc/otel-collector-config.yaml:ro
depends_on:
- tempo
networks:
- xrpld-telemetry
# Grafana Tempo: distributed tracing backend that stores and indexes
# spans. Queryable via TraceQL in Grafana Explore.
tempo:
image: grafana/tempo:2.7.2
command: ["-config.file=/etc/tempo.yaml"]
ports:
- "3200:3200" # Tempo HTTP API (health check, query)
volumes:
# Mount Tempo storage and ingestion config
- ./tempo.yaml:/etc/tempo.yaml:ro
# Persistent volume for trace data (WAL + blocks)
- tempo-data:/var/tempo
networks:
- xrpld-telemetry
# Grafana: visualization UI with Tempo pre-configured as a datasource.
# Anonymous admin access enabled for local development convenience.
grafana:
image: grafana/grafana:11.5.2
environment:
- GF_AUTH_ANONYMOUS_ENABLED=true # No login required for local dev
- GF_AUTH_ANONYMOUS_ORG_ROLE=Admin # Full access without auth
ports:
- "3000:3000" # Grafana web UI
volumes:
# Auto-provision Tempo datasource and search filters on startup
- ./grafana/provisioning:/etc/grafana/provisioning:ro
depends_on:
- tempo
networks:
- xrpld-telemetry
# Named volume for Tempo trace storage (WAL and compacted blocks).
# Data persists across container restarts. Remove with:
# docker compose -f docker/telemetry/docker-compose.yml down -v
volumes:
tempo-data:
# Isolated bridge network so services communicate by container name
# (e.g., the collector reaches Tempo at http://tempo:4317).
networks:
xrpld-telemetry:
driver: bridge

View File

@@ -1,125 +0,0 @@
# Grafana datasource provisioning for Grafana Tempo.
# Auto-configures Tempo as a trace data source on Grafana startup.
# Access Grafana at http://localhost:3000, then use Explore -> Tempo
# to browse xrpld traces using TraceQL.
#
# Search filters provide pre-configured dropdowns in the Explore UI.
# Each phase adds filters for the span attributes it introduces.
# Phase 1b (infra): Base filters — node identity, service, span name, status.
# Phase 2 (RPC): RPC command, status, role filters.
# Phase 3 (TX): Transaction hash, local/peer origin, status.
apiVersion: 1
datasources:
- name: Tempo
type: tempo
access: proxy
url: http://tempo:3200
uid: tempo
jsonData:
nodeGraph:
enabled: true
# Service map and traces-to-metrics require a Prometheus datasource
# (not included in this stack). These features are inactive until a
# Prometheus service is added to docker-compose.yml.
serviceMap:
datasourceUid: prometheus
tracesToMetrics:
datasourceUid: prometheus
spanStartTimeShift: "-1h"
spanEndTimeShift: "1h"
search:
filters:
# --- Node identification filters ---
# service.name: logical service name (default: "xrpld").
# Useful when running multiple service types in the same collector.
- id: service-name
tag: service.name
operator: "="
scope: resource
type: static
# service.instance.id: unique node identifier — defaults to the
# node's public key (e.g., nHB1X37...). Distinguishes individual
# nodes in a multi-node cluster or network.
- id: node-id
tag: service.instance.id
operator: "="
scope: resource
type: static
# service.version: xrpld build version (e.g., "2.4.0-b1").
# Filter traces from specific software releases.
- id: node-version
tag: service.version
operator: "="
scope: resource
type: dynamic
# xrpl.network.id: numeric network identifier
# (0 = mainnet, 1 = testnet, 2 = devnet, etc.).
# Derived from the [network_id] config section.
- id: network-id
tag: xrpl.network.id
operator: "="
scope: resource
type: dynamic
# xrpl.network.type: human-readable network name derived from
# network ID ("mainnet", "testnet", "devnet", "unknown").
- id: network-type
tag: xrpl.network.type
operator: "="
scope: resource
type: static
# --- Span intrinsic filters ---
# name: the span operation name (e.g., "rpc.command.server_info").
# Use to find traces for a specific RPC command or subsystem.
- id: span-name
tag: name
operator: "="
scope: intrinsic
type: static
# status: span completion status ("ok", "error", "unset").
# Filter for failed operations to diagnose errors.
- id: span-status
tag: status
operator: "="
scope: intrinsic
type: static
# duration: span wall-clock duration. Use with ">" operator
# to find slow operations (e.g., duration > 500ms).
- id: span-duration
tag: duration
operator: ">"
scope: intrinsic
type: static
# Phase 2: RPC tracing filters
- id: rpc-command
tag: command
operator: "="
scope: span
type: static
- id: rpc-status
tag: rpc_status
operator: "="
scope: span
type: dynamic
- id: rpc-role
tag: rpc_role
operator: "="
scope: span
type: dynamic
# Phase 3: Transaction tracing filters
- id: tx-hash
tag: tx_hash
operator: "="
scope: span
type: static
- id: tx-origin
tag: local
operator: "="
scope: span
type: dynamic
- id: tx-status
tag: tx_status
operator: "="
scope: span
type: dynamic

View File

@@ -1,39 +0,0 @@
# OpenTelemetry Collector configuration for xrpld development.
#
# Pipeline: OTLP receiver -> batch processor -> debug + Tempo.
# xrpld sends traces via OTLP/HTTP to port 4318. The collector batches
# them and forwards to Tempo via OTLP/gRPC on the Docker network. Tempo
# is queryable via Grafana Explore using TraceQL.
receivers:
otlp:
protocols:
grpc:
endpoint: 0.0.0.0:4317
http:
endpoint: 0.0.0.0:4318
processors:
batch:
timeout: 1s
send_batch_size: 100
exporters:
debug:
verbosity: detailed
otlp/tempo:
endpoint: tempo:4317
tls:
insecure: true
extensions:
health_check:
endpoint: 0.0.0.0:13133
service:
extensions: [health_check]
pipelines:
traces:
receivers: [otlp]
processors: [batch]
exporters: [debug, otlp/tempo]

Some files were not shown because too many files have changed in this diff Show More