Compare commits

..

64 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Pratik Mankawde
a5299f86f7 Merge branch 'develop' into pratik/otel-phase1a-plan-docs
Signed-off-by: Pratik Mankawde <3397372+pratikmankawde@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-07-27 16:54:28 +01:00
Ayaz Salikhov
9466ecb5c2 ci: Group github-actions dependabot updates (#7876) 2026-07-27 14:32:53 +00:00
Sergey Kuznetsov
e0aa50c4be ci: Update CI image and prepare-runner action (#7874) 2026-07-27 14:18:01 +00:00
Andrzej Budzanowski
29120dfcbd test: Migrate nodestore tests from Beast to GTest (#7292)
Co-authored-by: Marek Foss <marek.foss@neti-soft.com>
Co-authored-by: Alex Kremer <akremer@ripple.com>
2026-07-27 13:00:14 +00:00
Andrzej Budzanowski
20801d98ac test: Improve the server status test to not race and randomly fail (#7304)
Co-authored-by: Alex Kremer <akremer@ripple.com>
2026-07-27 11:58:15 +00:00
dependabot[bot]
b878818e80 ci: [DEPENDABOT] bump actions/checkout from 7.0.0 to 7.0.1 (#7871)
Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-07-27 09:55:01 +00:00
Sergey Kuznetsov
fecfc0cf3f chore: Fix clang version in devshell (#7860)
Co-authored-by: Ayaz Salikhov <mathbunnyru@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-07-24 17:30:20 +00:00
Ayaz Salikhov
ea0a6904f0 chore: Verify tooling version for Nix-managed environments (#7862) 2026-07-24 15:52:45 +00:00
Ayaz Salikhov
29d74142ae build: Patсh binary in local Linux nix environment (#7859)
Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-07-24 14:59:24 +00:00
Kassaking7
9afa1cf4d1 fix: Update PermissionedDEX invariant domain tracking for valid offer replacement (#7387)
Co-authored-by: Bart <bthomee@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-07-23 21:40:21 +00:00
Ed Hennis
7908aec2ec feat: Check default fields are not default when serializing (#6267)
Co-authored-by: Vito <5780819+Tapanito@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Ayaz Salikhov <mathbunnyru@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Bart <bthomee@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-07-23 21:39:11 +00:00
Marek Foss
4c0180b3db test: Migrate csf and xrpld-consensus Beast non-JTx tests to GTest (#7046)
Co-authored-by: Alex Kremer <akremer@ripple.com>
2026-07-23 21:38:21 +00:00
Marek Foss
4acccfeda8 test: Modularize Peerfinder component and migrate Peerfinder tests from Beast to GTest and GMock (#7054)
Co-authored-by: Alex Kremer <akremer@ripple.com>
2026-07-23 21:00:06 +00:00
Ed Hennis
b89d75a2d5 test: Add an RAII class to manage the env.parseFailureExpected flag (#7669) 2026-07-23 20:57:00 +00:00
Ayaz Salikhov
40cdf49d15 build: Use custom libc in a devshell by default (#7852) 2026-07-23 19:05:24 +00:00
Mayukha Vadari
38c54c3f36 feat: Add fixCleanup3_4_0 amendment (no functionality yet) (#7854) 2026-07-23 18:50:59 +00:00
Sergey Kuznetsov
95e1ffea6e ci: Add llvm-tools-preview to rust toolchain (#7853) 2026-07-23 16:49:44 +00:00
Sergey Kuznetsov
74cfb3586a ci: Update CI image (#7850) 2026-07-23 11:21:49 +00:00
Ayaz Salikhov
0072ced94c ci: Update XRPLF/actions (#7849) 2026-07-23 10:22:18 +00:00
Mayukha Vadari
12ed506565 chore: Clean up grammar in PR template (#7846) 2026-07-22 18:50:10 +00:00
Ayaz Salikhov
3122de86bf build: Create versioned compiler/tooling symlinks in nix environments (#7844) 2026-07-22 17:04:02 +00:00
Sergey Kuznetsov
7edf39e622 ci: Use rust-overlay to bring Rust into nix (#7837) 2026-07-22 14:00:17 +00:00
dependabot[bot]
ba01b05f33 ci: [DEPENDABOT] bump actions/setup-python from 6.3.0 to 7.0.0 (#7830)
Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-07-21 16:04:45 +00:00
Sergey Kuznetsov
c414e1877d ci: Update pre-commit image (#7838) 2026-07-21 15:37:47 +00:00
Sergey Kuznetsov
f56b79f00d ci: Add cargo to pre-commit image (#7835) 2026-07-21 13:39:37 +00:00
Ayaz Salikhov
4918f3bb20 chore: Add doxygen in pre-commit image (#7836) 2026-07-21 13:38:26 +00:00
Mayukha Vadari
ee0a3dfad7 ci: Improve test debuggability (#7619)
Co-authored-by: Ayaz Salikhov <mathbunnyru@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-07-21 13:14:40 +00:00
Bart
042c9660cd chore: Add CODEOWNERS for CI-related changes (#7832)
Co-authored-by: Bart <11445373+bthomee@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-07-20 21:06:24 +00:00
Ayaz Salikhov
60b49f3fe0 ci: Use in-house image for pre-commit (#7610) 2026-07-20 19:11:09 +00:00
Ayaz Salikhov
4c869ee16c ci: Build separate pre-commit docker image (#7831) 2026-07-20 17:40:38 +00:00
Ayaz Salikhov
b2f45813e0 chore: Workaround boost compiler resolution inside Nix environment (#7826) 2026-07-20 14:04:08 +00:00
Pratik Mankawde
4d64d3215d updates to node-health
Signed-off-by: Pratik Mankawde <3397372+pratikmankawde@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-07-17 14:26:27 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
adeda255f0 Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/develop' into pratik/otel-phase1a-plan-docs 2026-07-08 16:02:37 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
26a85c764e code review comment addressed
Signed-off-by: Pratik Mankawde <3397372+pratikmankawde@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-07-06 18:15:23 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
dec68e3673 Merge branch 'develop' into pratik/otel-phase1a-plan-docs
Signed-off-by: Pratik Mankawde <3397372+pratikmankawde@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-07-06 17:01:50 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
d2c7a00584 docs(telemetry): note service.name on metrics and collector tier tagging
- 05-configuration-reference: service_name now applies to metrics as well
  as traces (service.name resource attribute).
- 07-observability-backends: document that collector enrichment includes
  deployment-tier tagging (deployment.environment + fallback
  xrpl.network.type) for filtering one Grafana stack by tier.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-03 19:53:54 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
190b9470a4 docs(telemetry): fix xrpl.network.type value (standalone → unknown)
The network-type label is derived from [network_id] in TelemetryConfig.cpp;
unmapped/unset IDs fall through to "unknown", not "standalone". Align the
design-doc resource-attribute table with the code and cfg example.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-26 16:31:06 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
4d5a71d327 Merge branch 'develop' into pratik/otel-phase1a-plan-docs 2026-06-26 14:23:21 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
34f41ea37f Merge branch 'develop' into pratik/otel-phase1a-plan-docs 2026-06-12 20:19:22 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
46dbc92b5f code review comments addressed
Signed-off-by: Pratik Mankawde <3397372+pratikmankawde@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-06-12 20:18:12 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
c3ccde3e39 docs(telemetry): document the span-attribute naming rules
State the rules so they stay consistent across code, collector, Tempo,
dashboards, and docs:

- Per-span-unique field -> bare name (the span name carries the domain).
- Same concept on more than one span -> ONE shared key, reused verbatim and
  distinguished by span name, never tagged with the emitting workflow
  (e.g. ledger_hash, full_validation, proposal_trusted/validation_trusted).
  Defined once in the base SpanNames.h and re-exported by each domain header.
- Collision qualifier <domain>_<field> only to separate DIFFERENT concepts that
  share a word, or the OTel-reserved status key (rpc_status, consensus_state).
- Dotted xrpl.<...> is reserved for resource attributes (xrpl.network.*).

Updates CONTRIBUTING.md (permanent home) and OpenTelemetryPlan §2.3.3.
2026-06-11 23:01:55 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
d6450631bf removed code blocks from plan docs
Signed-off-by: Pratik Mankawde <3397372+pratikmankawde@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-06-11 14:29:01 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
c0272f1314 docs: Add span attribute naming convention (OTel phase 1a)
Establish the single, authoritative naming convention for OpenTelemetry
span attribute keys so the code, collector, Tempo, dashboards, and docs
stay in sync.

- CONTRIBUTING.md: new "Telemetry span attribute naming" section under
  the Style guide as the permanent, canonical home for the rules.
- OpenTelemetryPlan/02-design-decisions.md: new section 2.3.3 stating the
  decided convention as design, and section 2.4 attribute schema realigned
  to the underscore form (exact key spelling defers to the *SpanNames.h
  constants).
- Sweep the remaining plan docs: convert dotted xrpl.<domain>.<field> span
  attribute keys to the underscore form; leave span names and the
  OTel-standard service.*/http.* and xrpl.network.* resource keys dotted.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-11 13:29:53 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
ede8a53a76 Merge branch 'develop' into pratik/otel-phase1a-plan-docs 2026-06-11 13:00:53 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
4f53291fe8 Merge branch 'develop' into pratik/otel-phase1a-plan-docs 2026-06-10 10:14:28 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
5598b0eac7 docs(telemetry): fix head sampling at 1.0, remove configurable ratio
Document that head sampling is intentionally fixed at 100% and no longer
exposes a sampling_ratio config knob. A per-node ratio let nodes make
divergent keep/drop decisions for the same distributed trace, producing
broken/partial traces; pinning at 1.0 with a ParentBased sampler keeps
decisions coherent across the network. Volume reduction is delegated to
collector-side tail sampling.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-09 18:22:52 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
fe13359024 docs(telemetry): enable peer tracing by default in plan docs
Flip trace_peer default false->true across the Phase-1a plan docs and
correct the rationale: peer spans record only peer_id (numeric local
connection id) plus trust/ledger metadata, never IP addresses or public
keys, so the 'includes addresses' caveat was inaccurate. The high-volume
note is retained.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-09 13:34:20 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
f5f13df5ff Merge branch 'develop' into pratik/otel-phase1a-plan-docs 2026-06-08 16:57:42 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
b46ee12a19 formatting fixes
Signed-off-by: Pratik Mankawde <3397372+pratikmankawde@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-06-03 14:07:21 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
154d441ff2 Merge branch 'develop' into pratik/otel-phase1a-plan-docs 2026-06-01 11:52:46 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
e1163f7180 Merge branch 'develop' into pratik/otel-phase1a-plan-docs
Signed-off-by: Pratik Mankawde <3397372+pratikmankawde@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-05-29 15:30:02 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
f3a095ab65 docs(telemetry): align Phase 1a plan docs with Phase 1b implementation
Phase-1a plan documents advertised OTLP/gRPC on port 4317 as the default
exporter, four unparsed [telemetry] config keys, and "Phase 4a Complete"
status with exit-criteria checkboxes marked done. Every downstream branch
through Phase 5 ships only OTLP/HTTP on port 4318 via OtlpHttpExporterFactory,
never parses the advertised keys, and the Phase 4 work is not yet delivered.

Fixes:
- 02-design-decisions.md: flip §2.1.1 SDK dependency recommendations to
  OTLP/HTTP (shipped) with OTLP/gRPC marked Future. Update §2.2 architecture
  diagram and text from OTLP/gRPC:4317 to OTLP/HTTP:4318. Rewrite §2.2.1 as
  "OTLP/HTTP (Shipped)" and §2.2.2 as "OTLP/gRPC (Future Work — Planned
  Upgrade)" with a concrete checklist (Conan dep, config parsing, factory
  branch, runbook/dashboard updates) for landing the gRPC transport later.
- 05-configuration-reference.md: drop the fabricated exporter/otlp_grpc key
  and the :4317 default from the sample config block and the options-summary
  table. Move trace_pathfind, trace_txq, trace_validator, trace_amendment
  into a new "Planned (not yet implemented)" table citing the phase that will
  add each one. Keep the example config minimal so copy-paste does not produce
  a silently-ignored stanza.
- 06-implementation-phases.md: reset Phase 4 Exit Criteria checkboxes from
  [x] to [ ] (Phase 4 is not shipped at Phase-1a time). Rename "Phase 4a
  Complete" to "Phase 4a Plan" and describe the work as future. Replace the
  broken forward link to Phase4_taskList.md (introduced in the Phase 2 PR)
  with a sentence pointing readers to where that spec will land. Renumber
  the final section 6.12 to 6.11 so it sits directly after 6.10; section 6.11
  ("Effort Summary") was intentionally removed in earlier edits.
2026-05-14 16:09:48 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
1fd971b78b fix(docs): apply rename scripts to OpenTelemetry plan docs
Run .github/scripts/rename/docs.sh to replace rippled → xrpld
references in all plan documentation files, fixing the check-rename
CI failure.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-28 13:57:38 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
d6c8dec451 Merge branch 'develop' into pratik/otel-phase1a-plan-docs 2026-04-28 11:19:51 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
30ecb32a6f Merge branch 'develop' into pratik/otel-phase1a-plan-docs 2026-04-27 19:42:09 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
a01b274352 Merge branch 'develop' into pratik/otel-phase1a-plan-docs 2026-04-20 17:21:44 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
193f5b39cb docs(telemetry): update plan docs for ServiceRegistry migration
Plan documents referenced Application.h and app_ for getTelemetry()
but the codebase now uses ServiceRegistry as the interface. Updated:

- 05-configuration-reference.md: getTelemetry() on ServiceRegistry,
  deferred serviceInstanceId pattern in ApplicationImp
- POC_taskList.md Task 4: target ServiceRegistry.h not Application.h,
  correct config file path and constructor pattern
- 04-code-samples.md: fix overlay() -> getOverlay(), rewrite JobQueue
  sample to reflect actual architecture (no app_ member)
- 03-implementation-strategy.md: fix file impact table path

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-16 15:37:13 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
db8111ef7c docs(telemetry): replace Jaeger with Tempo in architecture diagram
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-16 15:00:48 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
913a4b794c docs: correct OTel overhead estimates against SDK benchmarks
Verified CPU, memory, and network overhead calculations against
official OTel C++ SDK benchmarks (969 CI runs) and source code
analysis. Key corrections:

- Span creation: 200-500ns → 500-1000ns (SDK BM_SpanCreation median
  ~1000ns; original estimate matched API no-op, not SDK path)
- Per-TX overhead: 2.4μs → 4.0μs (2.0% vs 1.2%; still within 1-3%)
- Active span memory: ~200 bytes → ~500-800 bytes (Span wrapper +
  SpanData + std::map attribute storage)
- Static memory: ~456KB → ~8.3MB (BatchSpanProcessor worker thread
  stack ~8MB was omitted)
- Total memory ceiling: ~2.3MB → ~10MB
- Memory success metric target: <5MB → <10MB
- AddEvent: 50-80ns → 100-200ns

Added Section 3.5.4 with links to all benchmark sources.
Updated presentation.md with matching corrections.
High-level conclusions unchanged (1-3% CPU, negligible consensus).

Also includes: review fixes, cross-document consistency improvements,
additional component tracing docs (PathFinding, TxQ, Validator, etc.),
context size corrections (32 → 25 bytes).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-16 15:00:47 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
accea17e9d moved presentation.md file
Signed-off-by: Pratik Mankawde <3397372+pratikmankawde@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-04-16 15:00:47 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
c6fa00fbe3 Remove effort estimates from implementation phases document
Strip effort/risk columns from task tables and remove the §6.9 Effort
Summary section with its pie chart and resource requirements table.
Renumber §6.10 Quick Wins → §6.9.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-16 15:00:47 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
bfb8f4f01a Add Phase 4a implementation status to plan docs
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-16 15:00:47 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
4b745a86b7 Appendix: add 00-tracing-fundamentals.md and POC_taskList.md to document index
Split document index into Plan Documents and Task Lists sections.
These files were introduced in this branch but missing from the index.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-16 15:00:47 +01:00
Pratik Mankawde
ddf894dcb0 Phase 1a: OpenTelemetry plan documentation
Add comprehensive planning documentation for the OpenTelemetry
distributed tracing integration:

- Tracing fundamentals and concepts
- Architecture analysis of rippled's tracing surface area
- Design decisions and trade-offs
- Implementation strategy and code samples
- Configuration reference
- Implementation phases roadmap
- Observability backend comparison
- POC task list and presentation materials

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-16 15:00:47 +01:00
267 changed files with 13175 additions and 7947 deletions

View File

@@ -30,7 +30,9 @@ ignoreRegExpList:
- ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
- ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
overrides:
- filename: "**/*_test.cpp" # all test files
- filename:
- "**/*_test.cpp" # legacy boost.test files
- "src/tests/**/*.cpp" # gtest test files
ignoreRegExpList:
- /"[^"]*"/g # double-quoted strings
- /'[^']*'/g # single-quoted strings
@@ -65,6 +67,7 @@ words:
- Btrfs
- Buildx
- canonicality
- CGNAT
- canonicalised
- changespq
- checkme
@@ -123,6 +126,8 @@ words:
- fsanitize
- funclets
- Gamal
- gantt
- Gantt
- gcov
- gcovr
- ghead
@@ -169,12 +174,11 @@ words:
- mathbunnyru
- mcmodel
- MEMORYSTATUSEX
- MPTAMM
- MPTDEX
- Merkle
- Metafuncton
- misprediction
- missingok
- MPTAMM
- mptbalance
- MPTDEX
- mptflags
@@ -208,6 +212,7 @@ words:
- nonxrp
- noreplace
- noripple
- nostd
- nostdinc
- notifempty
- nudb
@@ -216,6 +221,8 @@ words:
- Nyffenegger
- onlatest
- ostr
- otelc
- oxalica
- pargs
- partitioner
- paychan
@@ -309,6 +316,7 @@ words:
- TMEndpointv2
- toolchain
- tparam
- traceql
- trixie
- tx
- txid
@@ -316,6 +324,7 @@ words:
- txjson
- txn
- txns
- txqueue
- txs
- ubsan
- UBSAN
@@ -340,6 +349,7 @@ words:
- unsquelch
- unsquelched
- unsquelching
- unsuffixed
- unvalidated
- unveto
- unvetoed
@@ -365,4 +375,5 @@ words:
- xrplf
- xxhash
- xxhasher
- CGNAT
- xychart
- zpages

View File

@@ -15,3 +15,7 @@ updates:
commit-message:
prefix: "ci: [DEPENDABOT] "
target-branch: develop
groups:
github-actions:
patterns:
- "*"

View File

@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
<!--
This PR template helps you to write a good pull request description.
This PR template helps you write a good pull request description.
Please feel free to include additional useful information even beyond what is requested below.
If your branch is on a personal fork and has a name that allows it to
run CI build/test jobs (e.g. "ci/foo"), remember to rename it BEFORE
opening the PR. This avoids unnecessary redundant test runs. Renaming
opening the PR. This avoids redundant test runs. Renaming
the branch after opening the PR will close the PR.
https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/configuring-branches-and-merges-in-your-repository/managing-branches-in-your-repository/renaming-a-branch
-->
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/configuring-branches-and-merges-in-your-
Please include a summary of the changes.
This may be a direct input to the release notes.
If too broad, please consider splitting into multiple PRs.
If a relevant task or issue, please link it here.
If there is a relevant task or issue, please link it here.
-->
### Context of Change
@@ -65,5 +65,5 @@ This section may not be needed if your change includes thoroughly commented unit
<!--
## Future Tasks
For future tasks related to PR.
For future tasks related to this PR.
-->

View File

@@ -40,18 +40,18 @@ listed later.
| 04 | xrpl/protocol |
| 05 | xrpl/core xrpl/resource xrpl/server |
| 06 | xrpl/ledger xrpl/nodestore xrpl/net |
| 07 | xrpl/shamap |
| 07 | xrpl/shamap xrpl/consensus |
## xrpld Modules (Application Implementation)
| Level / Tier | Module(s) |
| ------------ | -------------------------------- |
| 05 | xrpld/conditions xrpld/consensus |
| 06 | xrpld/core xrpld/peerfinder |
| 07 | xrpld/shamap xrpld/overlay |
| 08 | xrpld/app |
| 09 | xrpld/rpc |
| 10 | xrpld/perflog |
| Level / Tier | Module(s) |
| ------------ | --------------------------- |
| 05 | xrpld/conditions |
| 06 | xrpld/core xrpld/peerfinder |
| 07 | xrpld/shamap xrpld/overlay |
| 08 | xrpld/app |
| 09 | xrpld/rpc |
| 10 | xrpld/perflog |
## Test Modules

View File

@@ -1,9 +1,6 @@
Loop: xrpld.app xrpld.overlay
xrpld.app > xrpld.overlay
Loop: xrpld.app xrpld.peerfinder
xrpld.peerfinder ~= xrpld.app
Loop: xrpld.app xrpld.rpc
xrpld.rpc > xrpld.app

View File

@@ -6,6 +6,8 @@ libxrpl.conditions > xrpl.basics
libxrpl.conditions > xrpl.conditions
libxrpl.config > xrpl.basics
libxrpl.config > xrpl.config
libxrpl.consensus > xrpl.basics
libxrpl.consensus > xrpl.consensus
libxrpl.core > xrpl.basics
libxrpl.core > xrpl.core
libxrpl.core > xrpl.json
@@ -25,6 +27,9 @@ libxrpl.nodestore > xrpl.config
libxrpl.nodestore > xrpl.json
libxrpl.nodestore > xrpl.nodestore
libxrpl.nodestore > xrpl.protocol
libxrpl.peerfinder > xrpl.basics
libxrpl.peerfinder > xrpl.peerfinder
libxrpl.peerfinder > xrpl.protocol
libxrpl.protocol > xrpl.basics
libxrpl.protocol > xrpl.json
libxrpl.protocol > xrpl.protocol
@@ -60,9 +65,9 @@ test.app > test.jtx
test.app > test.unit_test
test.app > xrpl.basics
test.app > xrpl.config
test.app > xrpl.consensus
test.app > xrpl.core
test.app > xrpld.app
test.app > xrpld.consensus
test.app > xrpld.core
test.app > xrpld.overlay
test.app > xrpld.rpc
@@ -83,12 +88,9 @@ test.basics > xrpl.protocol
test.beast > xrpl.basics
test.conditions > xrpl.basics
test.conditions > xrpl.conditions
test.consensus > test.csf
test.consensus > test.jtx
test.consensus > test.unit_test
test.consensus > xrpl.basics
test.consensus > xrpld.app
test.consensus > xrpld.consensus
test.consensus > xrpl.ledger
test.consensus > xrpl.protocol
test.consensus > xrpl.shamap
@@ -103,10 +105,6 @@ test.core > xrpl.json
test.core > xrpl.protocol
test.core > xrpl.rdb
test.core > xrpl.server
test.csf > xrpl.basics
test.csf > xrpld.consensus
test.csf > xrpl.json
test.csf > xrpl.ledger
test.json > test.jtx
test.json > xrpl.json
test.jtx > test.unit_test
@@ -132,12 +130,9 @@ test.ledger > xrpl.json
test.ledger > xrpl.ledger
test.ledger > xrpl.protocol
test.nodestore > test.jtx
test.nodestore > test.unit_test
test.nodestore > xrpl.basics
test.nodestore > xrpl.config
test.nodestore > xrpld.core
test.nodestore > xrpl.nodestore
test.nodestore > xrpl.protocol
test.nodestore > xrpl.rdb
test.overlay > test.jtx
test.overlay > test.unit_test
@@ -146,19 +141,13 @@ test.overlay > xrpl.config
test.overlay > xrpld.app
test.overlay > xrpld.core
test.overlay > xrpld.overlay
test.overlay > xrpld.peerfinder
test.overlay > xrpl.json
test.overlay > xrpl.nodestore
test.overlay > xrpl.peerfinder
test.overlay > xrpl.protocol
test.overlay > xrpl.resource
test.overlay > xrpl.server
test.overlay > xrpl.shamap
test.peerfinder > test.beast
test.peerfinder > test.unit_test
test.peerfinder > xrpl.basics
test.peerfinder > xrpld.core
test.peerfinder > xrpld.peerfinder
test.peerfinder > xrpl.protocol
test.protocol > test.jtx
test.protocol > test.unit_test
test.protocol > xrpl.basics
@@ -192,11 +181,13 @@ test.unit_test > xrpl.basics
test.unit_test > xrpl.protocol
tests.libxrpl > xrpl.basics
tests.libxrpl > xrpl.config
tests.libxrpl > xrpl.consensus
tests.libxrpl > xrpl.core
tests.libxrpl > xrpl.json
tests.libxrpl > xrpl.ledger
tests.libxrpl > xrpl.net
tests.libxrpl > xrpl.nodestore
tests.libxrpl > xrpl.peerfinder
tests.libxrpl > xrpl.protocol
tests.libxrpl > xrpl.protocol_autogen
tests.libxrpl > xrpl.resource
@@ -206,6 +197,10 @@ tests.libxrpl > xrpl.tx
xrpl.conditions > xrpl.basics
xrpl.conditions > xrpl.protocol
xrpl.config > xrpl.basics
xrpl.consensus > xrpl.basics
xrpl.consensus > xrpl.json
xrpl.consensus > xrpl.ledger
xrpl.consensus > xrpl.protocol
xrpl.core > xrpl.basics
xrpl.core > xrpl.json
xrpl.core > xrpl.protocol
@@ -220,6 +215,8 @@ xrpl.nodestore > xrpl.basics
xrpl.nodestore > xrpl.config
xrpl.nodestore > xrpl.json
xrpl.nodestore > xrpl.protocol
xrpl.peerfinder > xrpl.basics
xrpl.peerfinder > xrpl.protocol
xrpl.protocol > xrpl.basics
xrpl.protocol > xrpl.json
xrpl.protocol_autogen > xrpl.json
@@ -246,23 +243,20 @@ xrpl.tx > xrpl.protocol
xrpld.app > test.unit_test
xrpld.app > xrpl.basics
xrpld.app > xrpl.config
xrpld.app > xrpl.consensus
xrpld.app > xrpl.core
xrpld.app > xrpld.consensus
xrpld.app > xrpld.core
xrpld.app > xrpl.json
xrpld.app > xrpl.ledger
xrpld.app > xrpl.net
xrpld.app > xrpl.nodestore
xrpld.app > xrpl.peerfinder
xrpld.app > xrpl.protocol
xrpld.app > xrpl.rdb
xrpld.app > xrpl.resource
xrpld.app > xrpl.server
xrpld.app > xrpl.shamap
xrpld.app > xrpl.tx
xrpld.consensus > xrpl.basics
xrpld.consensus > xrpl.json
xrpld.consensus > xrpl.ledger
xrpld.consensus > xrpl.protocol
xrpld.core > xrpl.basics
xrpld.core > xrpl.config
xrpld.core > xrpl.core
@@ -271,21 +265,22 @@ xrpld.core > xrpl.protocol
xrpld.core > xrpl.rdb
xrpld.overlay > xrpl.basics
xrpld.overlay > xrpl.config
xrpld.overlay > xrpl.consensus
xrpld.overlay > xrpl.core
xrpld.overlay > xrpld.consensus
xrpld.overlay > xrpld.core
xrpld.overlay > xrpld.peerfinder
xrpld.overlay > xrpl.json
xrpld.overlay > xrpl.ledger
xrpld.overlay > xrpl.peerfinder
xrpld.overlay > xrpl.protocol
xrpld.overlay > xrpl.resource
xrpld.overlay > xrpl.server
xrpld.overlay > xrpl.shamap
xrpld.overlay > xrpl.tx
xrpld.peerfinder > xrpl.basics
xrpld.peerfinder > xrpl.config
xrpld.peerfinder > xrpld.app
xrpld.peerfinder > xrpld.core
xrpld.peerfinder > xrpl.protocol
xrpld.peerfinder > xrpl.peerfinder
xrpld.peerfinder > xrpl.rdb
xrpld.perflog > xrpl.basics
xrpld.perflog > xrpl.config

View File

@@ -46,9 +46,6 @@ for DIRECTORY in "${DIRECTORIES[@]}"; do
done
done
# Special case for NuDBFactory that has ripple twice in the test suite name.
${SED_COMMAND} -i -E 's/(BEAST_DEFINE_TESTSUITE.+)ripple(.+)/\1xrpl\2/g' src/test/nodestore/NuDBFactory_test.cpp
DIRECTORY=$1
find "${DIRECTORY}" -type f -name "*.md" | while read -r FILE; do
echo "Processing file: ${FILE}"

View File

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
{
"image_tag": "sha-2e25435",
"image_tag": "sha-fecfc0c",
"configs": {
"ubuntu": [
{

View File

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
name: Build Nix Docker images
name: Build `nix` Docker images
on:
push:
@@ -8,20 +8,24 @@ on:
- ".github/workflows/build-nix-images.yml"
- "flake.nix"
- "flake.lock"
- "rust-toolchain.toml"
- "nix/**"
- "!nix/docker/README.md"
- "!nix/devshell.nix"
- "bin/check-tools.sh"
- "bin/default-loader-path.sh"
- "bin/install-sanitizer-libs.sh"
pull_request:
paths:
- ".github/workflows/build-nix-images.yml"
- "flake.nix"
- "flake.lock"
- "rust-toolchain.toml"
- "nix/**"
- "!nix/docker/README.md"
- "!nix/devshell.nix"
- "bin/check-tools.sh"
- "bin/default-loader-path.sh"
- "bin/install-sanitizer-libs.sh"
workflow_dispatch:
@@ -36,7 +40,7 @@ defaults:
jobs:
build-merge:
name: Build and push nix-${{ matrix.distro.name }}
name: Build and push `nix-${{ matrix.distro.name }}` image
permissions:
contents: read
packages: write
@@ -54,7 +58,7 @@ jobs:
base_image: debian:bookworm
- name: rhel
base_image: registry.access.redhat.com/ubi9/ubi:latest
uses: XRPLF/actions/.github/workflows/build-multiarch-image.yml@ee03d31bcc4501d7599dc1b1ecd7a34af582ad1c
uses: XRPLF/actions/.github/workflows/build-multiarch-image.yml@9e7e4e80af9e684c116b38369add8eea64451f32
with:
image_name: xrpld/nix-${{ matrix.distro.name }}
dockerfile: nix/docker/Dockerfile

View File

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
name: Build packaging Docker images
name: Build `packaging` Docker images
on:
push:
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ defaults:
jobs:
build-merge:
name: Build and push packaging-${{ matrix.distro.name }}
name: Build and push `packaging-${{ matrix.distro.name }}` image
permissions:
contents: read
packages: write
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ jobs:
base_image: debian:bookworm
- name: rhel
base_image: registry.access.redhat.com/ubi9/ubi:latest
uses: XRPLF/actions/.github/workflows/build-multiarch-image.yml@ee03d31bcc4501d7599dc1b1ecd7a34af582ad1c
uses: XRPLF/actions/.github/workflows/build-multiarch-image.yml@9e7e4e80af9e684c116b38369add8eea64451f32
with:
image_name: xrpld/packaging-${{ matrix.distro.name }}
dockerfile: package/Dockerfile

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
name: Build `pre-commit` Docker image
on:
push:
branches:
- develop
paths:
- ".github/workflows/build-pre-commit-image.yml"
- "bin/pre-commit/Dockerfile"
- "rust-toolchain.toml"
pull_request:
paths:
- ".github/workflows/build-pre-commit-image.yml"
- "bin/pre-commit/Dockerfile"
- "rust-toolchain.toml"
workflow_dispatch:
concurrency:
# Read `on-trigger.yml` for the rationale behind this concurrency group name.
group: ${{ github.workflow }}-${{ github.event_name == 'push' && github.ref == 'refs/heads/develop' && github.sha || github.ref }}
cancel-in-progress: true
defaults:
run:
shell: bash
jobs:
build-merge:
name: Build and push `pre-commit` image
permissions:
contents: read
packages: write
uses: XRPLF/actions/.github/workflows/build-multiarch-image.yml@9e7e4e80af9e684c116b38369add8eea64451f32
with:
image_name: xrpld/pre-commit
dockerfile: bin/pre-commit/Dockerfile
base_image: ubuntu:26.04
push: ${{ github.event_name == 'push' }}

View File

@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ jobs:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- name: Checkout repository
uses: actions/checkout@9c091bb21b7c1c1d1991bb908d89e4e9dddfe3e0 # v7.0.0
uses: actions/checkout@3d3c42e5aac5ba805825da76410c181273ba90b1 # v7.0.1
- name: Write PR body to file
env:

View File

@@ -20,4 +20,4 @@ on:
jobs:
check_title:
if: ${{ github.event.pull_request.draft != true }}
uses: XRPLF/actions/.github/workflows/check-pr-title.yml@cba1f0891650baf1a9c88624dc2d72573be2eb81
uses: XRPLF/actions/.github/workflows/check-pr-title.yml@d7c65e49225a38f6d8010eacf017bb5a98d7476c

114
.github/workflows/check-tools.yml vendored Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
# Verifies the committed snapshots of `bin/check-tools.sh` output for each Nix
# environment (see nix/check-tools/). If the environment changes — a new image
# tag, an updated flake.lock, a different tool list — without the matching
# snapshot being regenerated and committed, this workflow fails so the drift is
# caught in review.
#
# To regenerate the snapshots, see nix/check-tools/README.md.
name: Check tools
on:
pull_request:
paths:
- ".github/workflows/check-tools.yml"
- ".github/scripts/strategy-matrix/linux.json"
- "bin/check-tools.sh"
- "nix/**"
- "flake.nix"
- "flake.lock"
- "rust-toolchain.toml"
push:
branches:
- "develop"
paths:
- ".github/workflows/check-tools.yml"
- ".github/scripts/strategy-matrix/linux.json"
- "bin/check-tools.sh"
- "nix/**"
- "flake.nix"
- "flake.lock"
- "rust-toolchain.toml"
workflow_dispatch:
concurrency:
group: ${{ github.workflow }}-${{ github.ref }}
cancel-in-progress: true
defaults:
run:
shell: bash
jobs:
# The nix-nixos image tag is pinned alongside the build matrix in linux.json,
# so snapshots are checked against the exact image CI builds against.
linux-image-tag:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
outputs:
tag: ${{ steps.tag.outputs.tag }}
steps:
- name: Checkout repository
uses: actions/checkout@3d3c42e5aac5ba805825da76410c181273ba90b1 # v7.0.1
- name: Read nix image tag
id: tag
run: echo "tag=$(jq -r .image_tag .github/scripts/strategy-matrix/linux.json)" >>"${GITHUB_OUTPUT}"
# One job for all environments; they differ only in whether the tools come
# from the nix-nixos container (Linux) or `nix develop` (macOS).
check-tools:
needs: linux-image-tag
strategy:
fail-fast: false
matrix:
include:
- runner: ubuntu-latest
snapshot: nix/check-tools/nix-ubuntu-amd64.txt
nix_develop: false
- runner: ubuntu-24.04-arm
snapshot: nix/check-tools/nix-ubuntu-arm64.txt
nix_develop: false
- runner: macos-26-apple-clang-21
snapshot: nix/check-tools/macos.txt
nix_develop: true
runs-on: ${{ matrix.runner }}
# Linux runs inside the pinned nix-nixos image; macOS runs natively and uses
# the flake's dev shell instead (see the run step below).
container: ${{ !matrix.nix_develop && format('ghcr.io/xrplf/xrpld/nix-ubuntu:{0}', needs.linux-image-tag.outputs.tag) || null }}
steps:
- name: Checkout repository
uses: actions/checkout@3d3c42e5aac5ba805825da76410c181273ba90b1 # v7.0.1
- name: Prepare runner
uses: XRPLF/actions/prepare-runner@c00c22ada3bd6bcda48fcb0d62fbbab49fec8a0f
with:
enable_ccache: false
- name: Regenerate snapshot
env:
CHECK_TOOLS_SKIP_CLONE: "1"
# check-tools.sh skips some macOS tools when CI is set; the snapshots
# capture the full `nix develop` environment, so unset it here.
CI: ""
run: |
if [ "${{ matrix.nix_develop }}" = "true" ]; then
# `nix develop` prints the dev-shell greeting first; keep only the
# check-tools.sh output (from the "Detected OS:" line onward).
nix --extra-experimental-features "nix-command flakes" develop \
-c bash bin/check-tools.sh | sed -n '/^Detected OS:/,$p' >"${{ matrix.snapshot }}"
else
bash bin/check-tools.sh >"${{ matrix.snapshot }}"
fi
- name: Verify snapshot is up to date
run: |
if ! git diff --exit-code -- "${{ matrix.snapshot }}"; then
echo "::error::${{ matrix.snapshot }} is out of date. Regenerate it (see nix/check-tools/README.md) and commit the result."
exit 1
fi
- name: Upload regenerated snapshot
if: failure()
uses: actions/upload-artifact@043fb46d1a93c77aae656e7c1c64a875d1fc6a0a # v7.0.1
with:
name: check-tools-${{ runner.os }}-${{ runner.arch }}
path: ${{ matrix.snapshot }}

View File

@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ jobs:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- name: Checkout repository
uses: actions/checkout@9c091bb21b7c1c1d1991bb908d89e4e9dddfe3e0 # v7.0.0
uses: actions/checkout@3d3c42e5aac5ba805825da76410c181273ba90b1 # v7.0.1
- name: Determine changed files
# This step checks whether any files have changed that should
# cause the next jobs to run. We do it this way rather than
@@ -90,6 +90,7 @@ jobs:
.clang-tidy
.codecov.yml
bin/check-tools.sh
bin/default-loader-path.sh
cfg/**
cmake/**
conan/**

View File

@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ on:
- ".clang-tidy"
- ".codecov.yml"
- "bin/check-tools.sh"
- "bin/default-loader-path.sh"
- "cfg/**"
- "cmake/**"
- "conan/**"

View File

@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ on:
jobs:
# Call the workflow in the XRPLF/actions repo that runs the pre-commit hooks.
run-hooks:
uses: XRPLF/actions/.github/workflows/pre-commit.yml@1bde119a1ab71305ba5d3716e7a82cea1c7bdede
uses: XRPLF/actions/.github/workflows/pre-commit.yml@3ba08d6ddf114092891d48491fc2e26c3ba15552
with:
runs_on: ubuntu-latest
container: '{ "image": "ghcr.io/xrplf/ci/tools-rippled-pre-commit:sha-41ec7c1" }'
container: '{ "image": "ghcr.io/xrplf/xrpld/pre-commit:sha-f56b79f" }'

View File

@@ -41,13 +41,13 @@ env:
jobs:
build:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
container: ghcr.io/xrplf/xrpld/nix-ubuntu:sha-2e25435
container: ghcr.io/xrplf/xrpld/nix-ubuntu:sha-fecfc0c
steps:
- name: Checkout repository
uses: actions/checkout@9c091bb21b7c1c1d1991bb908d89e4e9dddfe3e0 # v7.0.0
uses: actions/checkout@3d3c42e5aac5ba805825da76410c181273ba90b1 # v7.0.1
- name: Prepare runner
uses: XRPLF/actions/prepare-runner@ad188deb3dae79dc39816e16ddfdad1e06c6fab2
uses: XRPLF/actions/prepare-runner@c00c22ada3bd6bcda48fcb0d62fbbab49fec8a0f
with:
enable_ccache: false

View File

@@ -110,10 +110,10 @@ jobs:
uses: XRPLF/actions/cleanup-workspace@c7d9ce5ebb03c752a354889ecd870cadfc2b1cd4
- name: Checkout repository
uses: actions/checkout@9c091bb21b7c1c1d1991bb908d89e4e9dddfe3e0 # v7.0.0
uses: actions/checkout@3d3c42e5aac5ba805825da76410c181273ba90b1 # v7.0.1
- name: Prepare runner
uses: XRPLF/actions/prepare-runner@ad188deb3dae79dc39816e16ddfdad1e06c6fab2
uses: XRPLF/actions/prepare-runner@c00c22ada3bd6bcda48fcb0d62fbbab49fec8a0f
with:
enable_ccache: ${{ inputs.ccache_enabled }}
@@ -223,11 +223,13 @@ jobs:
BUILD_TYPE: ${{ inputs.build_type }}
CMAKE_TARGET: ${{ inputs.cmake_target }}
run: |
set -o pipefail
cmake \
--build . \
--config "${BUILD_TYPE}" \
--parallel "${BUILD_NPROC}" \
--target "${CMAKE_TARGET}"
--target "${CMAKE_TARGET}" \
2>&1 | tee "${GITHUB_WORKSPACE}/build.log"
- name: Show ccache statistics
if: ${{ inputs.ccache_enabled }}
@@ -322,7 +324,7 @@ jobs:
PRELOAD=""
fi
LD_PRELOAD="$PRELOAD" ./xrpld --unittest --unittest-jobs "${BUILD_NPROC}" 2>&1 | tee unittest.log
LD_PRELOAD="$PRELOAD" ./xrpld --unittest --unittest-jobs "${BUILD_NPROC}" 2>&1 | tee "${GITHUB_WORKSPACE}/unittest.log"
# Smoke-run every benchmark module with a single repetition to confirm the
# benchmarks still build and execute. This is a correctness check, not a
@@ -341,25 +343,27 @@ jobs:
done < <(find src/benchmarks -type f -perm -u+x -name 'xrpl.bench.*')
exit "${rc}"
- name: Show test failure summary
if: ${{ failure() && !inputs.build_only }}
env:
WORKING_DIR: ${{ runner.os == 'Windows' && format('{0}\{1}', env.BUILD_DIR, inputs.build_type) || env.BUILD_DIR }}
- name: Show build/test failure summary
if: ${{ failure() }}
run: |
if [ ! -d "${WORKING_DIR}" ]; then
echo "Working directory '${WORKING_DIR}' does not exist."
exit 0
fi
cd "${GITHUB_WORKSPACE}"
cd "${WORKING_DIR}"
if [ ! -f unittest.log ]; then
echo "unittest.log not found; embedded tests may not have run."
exit 0
fi
if ! grep -E "failed" unittest.log; then
echo "Log present but no failure lines found in unittest.log."
if [ -f unittest.log ]; then
if ! grep -E "failed" unittest.log | grep -vE "^I[0-9]|^[0-9]+> (ERR:|FTL:)"; then
echo "unittest.log present but no failure lines found."
fi
elif [ -f build.log ]; then
# GCC/Clang emit "error:" (covers "fatal error:"); MSVC emits
# "error C####:", "error LNK####:", and "fatal error LNK####:".
# -A6 prints the lines that follow each match (source line, caret,
# notes, and the "N errors generated" tally) to capture the whole
# diagnostic block.
if ! grep -E -A6 "error:|error C[0-9]{4}|error LNK[0-9]{4}|fatal error" build.log; then
echo "build.log present but no compile errors found."
fi
else
echo "unittest.log/build.log not found; something went wrong."
exit 1
fi
- name: Debug failure (Linux)
if: ${{ failure() && runner.os == 'Linux' && !inputs.build_only }}

View File

@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ jobs:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- name: Checkout repository
uses: actions/checkout@9c091bb21b7c1c1d1991bb908d89e4e9dddfe3e0 # v7.0.0
uses: actions/checkout@3d3c42e5aac5ba805825da76410c181273ba90b1 # v7.0.1
- name: Check levelization
run: python .github/scripts/levelization/generate.py
- name: Check for differences

View File

@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ jobs:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- name: Checkout repository
uses: actions/checkout@9c091bb21b7c1c1d1991bb908d89e4e9dddfe3e0 # v7.0.0
uses: actions/checkout@3d3c42e5aac5ba805825da76410c181273ba90b1 # v7.0.1
- name: Check definitions
run: .github/scripts/rename/definitions.sh .
- name: Check copyright notices

View File

@@ -34,16 +34,16 @@ jobs:
needs: [determine-files]
if: ${{ needs.determine-files.outputs.cpp_changed_files != '' || needs.determine-files.outputs.need_full_run == 'true' }}
runs-on: ["self-hosted", "Linux", "X64", "heavy"]
container: "ghcr.io/xrplf/xrpld/nix-debian:sha-2e25435"
container: "ghcr.io/xrplf/xrpld/nix-debian:sha-fecfc0c"
permissions:
contents: read
issues: write
steps:
- name: Checkout repository
uses: actions/checkout@9c091bb21b7c1c1d1991bb908d89e4e9dddfe3e0 # v7.0.0
uses: actions/checkout@3d3c42e5aac5ba805825da76410c181273ba90b1 # v7.0.1
- name: Prepare runner
uses: XRPLF/actions/prepare-runner@ad188deb3dae79dc39816e16ddfdad1e06c6fab2
uses: XRPLF/actions/prepare-runner@c00c22ada3bd6bcda48fcb0d62fbbab49fec8a0f
with:
enable_ccache: false

View File

@@ -27,10 +27,10 @@ jobs:
matrix: ${{ steps.generate.outputs.matrix }}
steps:
- name: Checkout repository
uses: actions/checkout@9c091bb21b7c1c1d1991bb908d89e4e9dddfe3e0 # v7.0.0
uses: actions/checkout@3d3c42e5aac5ba805825da76410c181273ba90b1 # v7.0.1
- name: Set up Python
uses: actions/setup-python@ece7cb06caefa5fff74198d8649806c4678c61a1 # v6.3.0
uses: actions/setup-python@5fda3b95a4ea91299a34e894583c3862153e4b97 # v7.0.0
with:
python-version: "3.13"
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ jobs:
steps:
- name: Checkout repository
uses: actions/checkout@9c091bb21b7c1c1d1991bb908d89e4e9dddfe3e0 # v7.0.0
uses: actions/checkout@3d3c42e5aac5ba805825da76410c181273ba90b1 # v7.0.1
- name: Download pre-built binary
uses: actions/download-artifact@3e5f45b2cfb9172054b4087a40e8e0b5a5461e7c # v8.0.1

View File

@@ -23,10 +23,10 @@ jobs:
matrix: ${{ steps.generate.outputs.matrix }}
steps:
- name: Checkout repository
uses: actions/checkout@9c091bb21b7c1c1d1991bb908d89e4e9dddfe3e0 # v7.0.0
uses: actions/checkout@3d3c42e5aac5ba805825da76410c181273ba90b1 # v7.0.1
- name: Set up Python
uses: actions/setup-python@ece7cb06caefa5fff74198d8649806c4678c61a1 # v6.3.0
uses: actions/setup-python@5fda3b95a4ea91299a34e894583c3862153e4b97 # v7.0.0
with:
python-version: "3.13"

View File

@@ -40,14 +40,14 @@ defaults:
jobs:
upload:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
container: ghcr.io/xrplf/xrpld/nix-ubuntu:sha-2e25435
container: ghcr.io/xrplf/xrpld/nix-ubuntu:sha-fecfc0c
env:
REMOTE_NAME: ${{ inputs.remote_name }}
CONAN_LOGIN_USERNAME_XRPLF: ${{ secrets.remote_username }}
CONAN_PASSWORD_XRPLF: ${{ secrets.remote_password }}
steps:
- name: Checkout repository
uses: actions/checkout@9c091bb21b7c1c1d1991bb908d89e4e9dddfe3e0 # v7.0.0
uses: actions/checkout@3d3c42e5aac5ba805825da76410c181273ba90b1 # v7.0.1
- name: Generate build version number
id: version

View File

@@ -65,10 +65,10 @@ jobs:
uses: XRPLF/actions/cleanup-workspace@c7d9ce5ebb03c752a354889ecd870cadfc2b1cd4
- name: Checkout repository
uses: actions/checkout@9c091bb21b7c1c1d1991bb908d89e4e9dddfe3e0 # v7.0.0
uses: actions/checkout@3d3c42e5aac5ba805825da76410c181273ba90b1 # v7.0.1
- name: Prepare runner
uses: XRPLF/actions/prepare-runner@ad188deb3dae79dc39816e16ddfdad1e06c6fab2
uses: XRPLF/actions/prepare-runner@c00c22ada3bd6bcda48fcb0d62fbbab49fec8a0f
with:
enable_ccache: false

3
.gitignore vendored
View File

@@ -81,6 +81,9 @@ DerivedData
# Python
__pycache__
# Rust build artifacts.
target/
# Direnv's directory
/.direnv

View File

@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ repos:
types_or: [c++, c]
- repo: https://github.com/pre-commit/mirrors-clang-format
rev: dd18dad857d6133e90bbe478f4f2f22ec0030269 # frozen: v22.1.5
rev: f4d7745e17a28aad7eed2f4874ca8d1568c11c4c # frozen: v22.1.8
hooks:
- id: clang-format
args: [--style=file]
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ repos:
- id: gersemi
- repo: https://github.com/rbubley/mirrors-prettier
rev: 39e2973981e6d2f9b6c543b0086a2d2393abdc89 # frozen: v3.9.4
rev: 9337a74165b178ae2c766f60bee7252a0f06f3e8 # frozen: v3.9.5
hooks:
- id: prettier
args: [--end-of-line=auto]

4
CODEOWNERS Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
# By default, anyone can review changes.
# The CI tooling team should review changes to the CI configuration.
/.github/ @XRPLF/ci-tooling

View File

@@ -354,6 +354,46 @@ If you wish to automatically fix whatever clang-tidy finds _and_ is capable of f
run-clang-tidy -p build -quiet -fix -allow-no-checks src tests
```
## Telemetry span attribute naming
OpenTelemetry span attribute keys follow these rules so they stay consistent
across the code, the OTel collector, Tempo, Grafana dashboards, and docs. The
constants in the `*SpanNames.h` headers are the single source of truth; every
other layer must match them. A CI check enforces this end to end.
1. Per-span unique attribute: bare field name — allowed when the field is
recorded by a single span/workflow, so the span name already supplies the
domain (e.g. `command`, `local`, `version` on `rpc.command` / `tx.process`).
2. Shared attribute (same concept on more than one span): ONE key, reused
verbatim on every span that records it — the span name tells the occurrences
apart, so no per-emitter prefix is added. Pick the name by the field's
meaning: a property of a domain object keeps that object's bare field name
(`ledger_hash`, `ledger_seq`, `tx_hash`, `peer_id`, `full_validation`); a
field already qualified by a sub-kind keeps that qualifier on every emitter
(`proposal_trusted` on both `consensus.proposal.receive` and
`peer.proposal.receive`; `validation_trusted` likewise). Define it once in
the base `SpanNames.h` `namespace attr` block and re-export (`using`) it from
each domain header, so all emitters share the exact string.
3. Collision qualifier: `<domain>_<field>` — only when a bare name would collide
with a DIFFERENT concept in the shared spanmetrics label space, or with the
OTel-reserved `status` key (e.g. `rpc_status`, `grpc_status`,
`consensus_phase`, `consensus_round`). This disambiguates distinct concepts
that share a word; it is NOT used to tag the same concept with the workflow
that emitted it — that is rule 2 (one shared name).
4. Resource attribute: dotted `xrpl.<subsystem>.<field>` — reserved ONLY for
process/network identity set once at startup (`xrpl.network.id`,
`xrpl.network.type`). Never use the dotted `xrpl.` form for span attributes.
5. Span names use `<subsystem>[.<component>]` (dotted). Only attribute _keys_
follow rules 14.
Standard OpenTelemetry semantic-convention keys keep their canonical dotted
form (e.g. `service.*` resource attributes, `http.*` span attributes); the
"no dotted form" rule above applies to xrpl-custom keys, not to OTel-standard
conventions.
Always reference the `*SpanNames.h` constants — never pass string literals as
attribute keys or values to `setAttribute`/`addEvent`.
## Contracts and instrumentation
We are using [Antithesis](https://antithesis.com/) for continuous fuzzing,

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,565 @@
# Distributed Tracing Fundamentals
> **Parent Document**: [OpenTelemetryPlan.md](./OpenTelemetryPlan.md)
> **Next**: [Architecture Analysis](./01-architecture-analysis.md)
---
## What is Distributed Tracing?
Distributed tracing is a method for tracking data objects as they flow through distributed systems. In a network like XRP Ledger, a single transaction touches multiple independent nodes—each with no shared memory or logging. Distributed tracing connects these dots.
**Without tracing:** You see isolated logs on each node with no way to correlate them.
**With tracing:** You see the complete journey of a transaction or an event across all nodes it touched.
---
## Actors and Actions at a Glance
### Actors
| Who (Plain English) | Technical Term |
| ---------------------------------------------- | --------------- |
| A single unit of work being tracked | Span |
| The complete journey of a request | Trace |
| Data that links spans across services | Trace Context |
| Code that creates spans and propagates context | Instrumentation |
| Service that receives and processes traces | Collector |
| Storage and visualization system | Backend (Tempo) |
| Decision logic for which traces to keep | Sampler |
### Actions
| What Happens (Plain English) | Technical Term |
| --------------------------------------- | ----------------------- |
| Start tracking a new operation | Create a Span |
| Connect a child operation to its parent | Set `parent_span_id` |
| Group all related operations together | Share a `trace_id` |
| Pass tracking data between services | Context Propagation |
| Decide whether to record a trace | Sampling (Head or Tail) |
| Send completed traces to storage | Export (OTLP) |
---
## Core Concepts
### 1. Trace
A **trace** represents the entire journey of a request through the system. It has a unique `trace_id` that stays constant across all nodes.
```
Trace ID: abc123
├── Node A: received transaction
├── Node B: relayed transaction
├── Node C: included in consensus
└── Node D: applied to ledger
```
### 2. Span
A **span** represents a single unit of work within a trace. Each span has:
| Attribute | Description | Example |
| ---------------- | -------------------------------- | -------------------------- |
| `trace_id` | Identifies the trace | `event123` |
| `span_id` | Unique identifier | `span456` |
| `parent_span_id` | Parent span (if any) | `p_span123` |
| `name` | Operation name | `rpc.submit` |
| `start_time` | When work began (local time) | `2024-01-15T10:30:00Z` |
| `end_time` | When work completed (local time) | `2024-01-15T10:30:00.050Z` |
| `attributes` | Key-value metadata | `tx_hash=ABC...` |
| `status` | OK, ERROR MSG | `OK` |
### 3. Trace Context
**Trace context** is the data that propagates between services to link spans together. It contains:
- `trace_id` - The trace this span belongs to
- `span_id` - The current span (becomes parent for child spans)
- `trace_flags` - Sampling decisions
---
## How Spans Form a Trace
Spans have parent-child relationships forming a tree structure:
```mermaid
flowchart TB
subgraph trace["Trace: abc123"]
A["tx.submit<br/>span_id: 001<br/>50ms"] --> B["tx.validate<br/>span_id: 002<br/>5ms"]
A --> C["tx.relay<br/>span_id: 003<br/>10ms"]
A --> D["tx.apply<br/>span_id: 004<br/>30ms"]
D --> E["ledger.update<br/>span_id: 005<br/>20ms"]
end
style A fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#ffffff
style B fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#ffffff
style C fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#ffffff
style D fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#ffffff
style E fill:#bf360c,stroke:#8c2809,color:#ffffff
```
**Reading the diagram:**
- **tx.submit (blue, root)**: The top-level span representing the entire transaction submission; all other spans are its descendants.
- **tx.validate, tx.relay, tx.apply (green)**: Direct children of tx.submit, representing the three main stages -- validation, relay to peers, and application to the ledger.
- **ledger.update (red)**: A grandchild span nested under tx.apply, representing the actual ledger state mutation triggered by applying the transaction.
- **Arrows (parent to child)**: Each arrow indicates a parent-child span relationship where the parent's completion depends on the child finishing.
The same trace visualized as a **timeline (Gantt chart)**:
```
Time → 0ms 10ms 20ms 30ms 40ms 50ms
├───────────────────────────────────────────┤
tx.submit│▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓│
├─────┤
tx.valid │▓▓▓▓▓│
│ ├──────────┤
tx.relay │ │▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓│
│ ├────────────────────────────┤
tx.apply │ │▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓│
│ ├──────────────────┤
ledger │ │▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓│
```
---
## Span Relationships
Spans don't always form simple parent-child trees. Distributed tracing defines several relationship types to capture different causal patterns:
### 1. Parent-Child (ChildOf)
The default relationship. The parent span **depends on** or **contains** the child span. The child runs within the scope of the parent.
```
tx.submit (parent)
├── tx.validate (child) ← parent waits for this
├── tx.relay (child) ← parent waits for this
└── tx.apply (child) ← parent waits for this
```
**When to use:** Synchronous calls, nested operations, any case where the parent's completion depends on the child.
### 2. Follows-From
A causal relationship where the first span **triggers** the second, but does **not wait** for it. The originator fires and moves on.
```
Time →
tx.receive [=======]
↓ triggers (follows-from)
tx.relay [===========] ← runs independently
```
**When to use:** Asynchronous jobs, queued work, fire-and-forget patterns. For example, a node receives a transaction and queues it for relay — the relay span _follows from_ the receive span but the receiver doesn't wait for relaying to complete.
> **OpenTracing** defined `FollowsFrom` as a first-class reference type alongside `ChildOf`.
> **OpenTelemetry** represents this using **Span Links** with descriptive attributes instead (see below).
### 3. Span Links (Cross-Trace and Non-Hierarchical)
Links connect spans that are **causally related but not in a parent-child hierarchy**. Unlike parent-child, links can cross trace boundaries.
```
Trace A Trace B
────── ──────
batch.schedule batch.execute
├─ item.enqueue (span X) ┌──► process.item
├─ item.enqueue (span Y) ───┤ (links to X, Y, Z)
├─ item.enqueue (span Z) └──►
```
**Use cases:**
| Pattern | Description |
| -------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| **Batch processing** | A batch span links back to all individual spans that contributed to it |
| **Fan-in** | An aggregation span links to the multiple producer spans it merges |
| **Fan-out** | Multiple downstream spans link back to the single span that triggered them |
| **Async handoff** | A deferred job links back to the request that queued it (follows-from) |
| **Cross-trace** | Correlating spans across independent traces (e.g., retries, related events) |
**Link structure:** Each link carries the target span's context plus optional attributes:
```
Link {
trace_id: <target trace>
span_id: <target span>
attributes: { "link.description": "triggered by batch scheduler" }
}
```
### Relationship Summary
```mermaid
flowchart LR
subgraph parent_child["Parent-Child"]
direction TB
P["Parent"] --> C["Child"]
end
subgraph follows_from["Follows-From"]
direction TB
A["Span A"] -.->|triggers| B["Span B"]
end
subgraph links["Span Links"]
direction TB
X["Span X\n(Trace 1)"] -.-|link| Y["Span Y\n(Trace 2)"]
end
parent_child ~~~ follows_from ~~~ links
style P fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#ffffff
style C fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#ffffff
style A fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#ffffff
style B fill:#bf360c,stroke:#8c2809,color:#ffffff
style X fill:#4a148c,stroke:#38006b,color:#ffffff
style Y fill:#4a148c,stroke:#38006b,color:#ffffff
```
| Relationship | Same Trace? | Dependency? | OTel Mechanism |
| ---------------- | ----------- | -------------------------- | ----------------- |
| **Parent-Child** | Yes | Parent depends on child | `parent_span_id` |
| **Follows-From** | Usually | Causal but no dependency | Link + attributes |
| **Span Link** | Either | Correlation, no dependency | Link + attributes |
---
## Trace ID Generation
A `trace_id` is a 128-bit (16-byte) identifier that groups all spans belonging to one logical operation. How it's generated determines how easily you can find and correlate traces later.
### General Approaches
#### 1. Random (W3C Default)
Generate a random 128-bit ID when a trace starts. Standard approach for most services.
```
trace_id = random_128_bits()
```
| Pros | Cons |
| --------------------------- | --------------------------------------------- |
| Simple, standard | No natural correlation to domain events |
| Guaranteed unique per trace | If propagation is lost, trace is broken |
| Works with all OTel tooling | "Find trace for TX abc" requires index lookup |
#### 2. Deterministic (Derived from Domain Data)
Compute the trace_id from a hash of a natural identifier. Every node independently derives the **same** trace_id for the same event.
```
trace_id = SHA-256(domain_identifier)[0:16] // truncate to 128 bits
```
| Pros | Cons |
| --------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------- |
| Propagation-resilient — same ID computed everywhere | Same event processed twice (retry) shares trace_id |
| Natural search — domain ID maps directly to trace | Non-standard (tooling assumes random) |
| No coordination needed between nodes | 256→128 bit truncation (collision risk negligible at ~2⁶⁴) |
#### 3. Hybrid (Deterministic Prefix + Random Suffix)
First 8 bytes derived from domain data, last 8 bytes random.
```
trace_id = SHA-256(domain_identifier)[0:8] || random_64_bits()
```
| Pros | Cons |
| ------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------- |
| Prefix search: "find all traces for TX abc" | Must propagate to maintain full trace_id |
| Unique per processing instance | More complex generation logic |
| Retries get distinct trace_ids | Partial correlation only (prefix match) |
### XRPL Workflow Analysis
XRPL has a unique advantage: its core workflows produce **globally unique 256-bit hashes** that are known on every node. This makes deterministic trace_id generation practical in ways most systems can't achieve.
#### Natural Identifiers by Workflow
| Workflow | Natural Identifier | Size | Known at Start? | Same on All Nodes? |
| ------------------- | --------------------------------- | ---------- | ----------------------------- | -------------------------------- |
| **Transaction** | Transaction hash (`tid_`) | 256-bit | Yes — computed before signing | Yes — hash of canonical tx data |
| **Consensus round** | Previous ledger hash + ledger seq | 256+32 bit | Yes — known when round opens | Yes — all validators agree |
| **Validation** | Ledger hash being validated | 256-bit | Yes — from consensus result | Yes — same closed ledger |
| **Ledger catch-up** | Target ledger hash | 256-bit | Yes — we know what to fetch | Yes — identifies ledger globally |
#### Where These Identifiers Live in Code
```
Transaction: STTx::getTransactionID() → uint256 tid_
TMTransaction::rawTransaction → recompute hash from bytes
Consensus: ConsensusProposal::prevLedger_ → uint256 (previous ledger hash)
ConsensusProposal::position_ → uint256 (TxSet hash)
LedgerHeader::seq → uint32_t (ledger sequence)
Validation: STValidation::getLedgerHash() → uint256
STValidation::getNodeID() → NodeID (160-bit)
Ledger fetch: InboundLedger constructor → uint256 hash, uint32_t seq
TMGetLedger::ledgerHash → bytes (uint256)
```
### Recommended Strategy: Workflow-Scoped Deterministic
Each workflow type derives its trace_id from its natural domain identifier:
```
Transaction trace: trace_id = SHA-256("tx" || tx_hash)[0:16]
Consensus trace: trace_id = SHA-256("cons" || prev_ledger_hash || ledger_seq)[0:16]
Ledger catch-up: trace_id = SHA-256("fetch" || target_ledger_hash)[0:16]
```
The string prefix (`"tx"`, `"cons"`, `"fetch"`) prevents collisions between workflows that might share underlying hashes.
**Why this works for XRPL:**
1. **Propagation-resilient** — Even if a P2P message drops trace context, every node independently computes the same trace_id from the same tx_hash or ledger_hash. Spans still correlate.
2. **Zero-cost search** — "Show me the trace for transaction ABC" becomes a direct lookup: compute `SHA-256("tx" || ABC)[0:16]` and query. No secondary index needed.
3. **Cross-workflow linking via Span Links** — A consensus trace links to individual transaction traces. A validation span links to the consensus trace. This connects the full picture without forcing everything into one giant trace.
### Cross-Workflow Correlation
Each workflow gets its own trace. Span Links tie them together:
```mermaid
flowchart TB
subgraph tx_trace["Transaction Trace"]
direction LR
Tn["trace_id = f(tx_hash)"]:::note --> T1["tx.receive"] --> T2["tx.validate"] --> T3["tx.relay"]
end
subgraph cons_trace["Consensus Trace"]
direction LR
Cn["trace_id = f(prev_ledger, seq)"]:::note --> C1["cons.open"] --> C2["cons.propose"] --> C3["cons.accept"]
end
subgraph val_trace["Validation"]
direction LR
Vn["spans within consensus trace"]:::note --> V1["val.create"] --> V2["val.broadcast"]
end
subgraph fetch_trace["Catch-Up Trace"]
direction LR
Fn["trace_id = f(ledger_hash)"]:::note --> F1["fetch.request"] --> F2["fetch.receive"] --> F3["fetch.apply"]
end
C1 -.-|"span link\n(tx traces)"| T3
C3 --> V1
F1 -.-|"span link\n(target ledger)"| C3
classDef note fill:none,stroke:#888,stroke-dasharray:5 5,color:#333,font-style:italic
style T1 fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#ffffff
style T2 fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#ffffff
style T3 fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#ffffff
style C1 fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#ffffff
style C2 fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#ffffff
style C3 fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#ffffff
style V1 fill:#bf360c,stroke:#8c2809,color:#ffffff
style V2 fill:#bf360c,stroke:#8c2809,color:#ffffff
style F1 fill:#4a148c,stroke:#38006b,color:#ffffff
style F2 fill:#4a148c,stroke:#38006b,color:#ffffff
style F3 fill:#4a148c,stroke:#38006b,color:#ffffff
```
**Reading the diagram:**
- **Transaction Trace (blue)**: An independent trace whose `trace_id` is deterministically derived from the transaction hash. Contains receive, validate, and relay spans.
- **Consensus Trace (green)**: An independent trace whose `trace_id` is derived from the previous ledger hash and sequence number. Covers the open, propose, and accept phases.
- **Validation (red)**: Validation spans live within the consensus trace (not a separate trace). They are created after the accept phase completes.
- **Catch-Up Trace (purple)**: An independent trace for ledger acquisition, derived from the target ledger hash. Used when a node is behind and fetching missing ledgers.
- **Dotted arrows (span links)**: Cross-trace correlations. Consensus links to transaction traces it included; catch-up links to the consensus trace that produced the target ledger.
- **Solid arrow (C3 to V1)**: A parent-child relationship -- validation spans are direct children of the consensus accept span within the same trace.
**How a query flows:**
```
"Why was TX abc slow?"
1. Compute trace_id = SHA-256("tx" || abc)[0:16]
2. Find transaction trace → see it was included in consensus round N
3. Follow span link → consensus trace for round N
4. See which phase was slow (propose? accept?)
5. If a node was catching up, follow link → catch-up trace
```
### Trade-offs to Consider
| Concern | Mitigation |
| ----------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| **Retries get same trace_id** | Add `attempt` attribute to root span; spans have unique span_ids and timestamps |
| **256→128 bit truncation** | Birthday-bound collision at ~2⁶⁴ operations — negligible for XRPL's throughput |
| **Non-standard generation** | OTel spec allows any 16-byte non-zero value; tooling works on the hex string |
| **Hash computation cost** | SHA-256 is ~0.3μs per call; XRPL already computes these hashes for other purposes |
| **Late-binding identifiers** | Ledger hash isn't known until after consensus — validation spans use ledger_seq as fallback, then link to the consensus trace |
---
## Distributed Traces Across Nodes
In distributed systems like xrpld, traces span **multiple independent nodes**. The trace context must be propagated in network messages:
```mermaid
sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant NodeA as Node A
participant NodeB as Node B
participant NodeC as Node C
Client->>NodeA: Submit TX<br/>(no trace context)
Note over NodeA: Creates new trace<br/>trace_id: abc123<br/>span: tx.receive
NodeA->>NodeB: Relay TX<br/>(trace_id: abc123, parent: 001)
Note over NodeB: Creates child span<br/>span: tx.relay<br/>parent_span_id: 001
NodeA->>NodeC: Relay TX<br/>(trace_id: abc123, parent: 001)
Note over NodeC: Creates child span<br/>span: tx.relay<br/>parent_span_id: 001
Note over NodeA,NodeC: All spans share trace_id: abc123<br/>enabling correlation across nodes
```
**Reading the diagram:**
- **Client**: The external entity that submits a transaction. It does not carry trace context -- the trace originates at the first node.
- **Node A**: The entry point that creates a new trace (trace_id: abc123) and the root span `tx.receive`. It relays the transaction to peers with trace context attached.
- **Node B and Node C**: Peer nodes that receive the relayed transaction along with the propagated trace context. Each creates a child span under Node A's span, preserving the same `trace_id`.
- **Arrows with trace context**: The relay messages carry `trace_id` and `parent_span_id`, allowing each downstream node to link its spans back to the originating span on Node A.
---
## Context Propagation
For traces to work across nodes, **trace context must be propagated** in messages.
### What's in the Context (~26 bytes)
| Field | Size | Description |
| ------------- | -------- | ------------------------------------------------------- |
| `trace_id` | 16 bytes | Identifies the entire trace (constant across all nodes) |
| `span_id` | 8 bytes | The sender's current span (becomes parent on receiver) |
| `trace_flags` | 1 byte | Sampling decision (bit 0 = sampled; bits 1-7 reserved) |
| `trace_state` | variable | Optional vendor-specific data (typically omitted) |
### How span_id Changes at Each Hop
Only **one** `span_id` travels in the context - the sender's current span. Each node:
1. Extracts the received `span_id` and uses it as the `parent_span_id`
2. Creates a **new** `span_id` for its own span
3. Sends its own `span_id` as the parent when forwarding
```
Node A Node B Node C
────── ────── ──────
Span AAA Span BBB Span CCC
│ │ │
▼ ▼ ▼
Context out: Context out: Context out:
├─ trace_id: abc123 ├─ trace_id: abc123 ├─ trace_id: abc123
├─ span_id: AAA ──────────► ├─ span_id: BBB ──────────► ├─ span_id: CCC ──────►
└─ flags: 01 └─ flags: 01 └─ flags: 01
│ │
parent = AAA parent = BBB
```
The `trace_id` stays constant, but `span_id` **changes at every hop** to maintain the parent-child chain.
### Propagation Formats
There are two patterns:
### HTTP/RPC Headers (W3C Trace Context)
```
traceparent: 00-4bf92f3577b34da6a3ce929d0e0e4736-00f067aa0ba902b7-01
│ │ │ │
│ │ │ └── Flags (sampled)
│ │ └── Parent span ID (16 hex)
│ └── Trace ID (32 hex)
└── Version
```
### Protocol Buffers (xrpld P2P messages)
xrpld P2P messages such as `TMTransaction` carry the trace context in two added byte fields alongside the existing payload: `trace_parent` holds the W3C traceparent (`trace_id`, `span_id`, and `trace_flags`), and `trace_state` holds the optional W3C tracestate. Together they propagate the trace across the P2P boundary so a receiving node can attach its spans to the sender's span.
---
## Sampling
Not every trace needs to be recorded. **Sampling** reduces overhead:
### Head Sampling (at trace start)
```
Request arrives → Random N% chance → Record or skip entire trace
```
- ✅ Low overhead
- ❌ May miss interesting traces
> **xrpld note**: xrpld intentionally fixes head sampling at 100% (sample
> everything) and does not expose a configurable ratio. A per-node ratio
> would let different nodes make divergent keep/drop decisions for the same
> distributed trace, producing broken/partial traces. xrpld uses a
> `ParentBased` sampler so spans with a remote parent honor the upstream
> decision. Volume reduction is delegated to collector-side tail sampling.
### Tail Sampling (after trace completes)
```
Trace completes → Collector evaluates:
- Error? → KEEP
- Slow? → KEEP
- Normal? → Sample 10%
```
- ✅ Never loses important traces
- ❌ Higher memory usage at collector
---
## Key Benefits for xrpld
| Challenge | How Tracing Helps |
| ---------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------- |
| "Where is my transaction?" | Follow trace across all nodes it touched |
| "Why was consensus slow?" | See timing breakdown of each phase |
| "Which node is the bottleneck?" | Compare span durations across nodes |
| "What happened during the outage?" | Correlate errors across the network |
---
## Glossary
| Term | Definition |
| -------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| **Trace** | Complete journey of a request, identified by `trace_id` |
| **Span** | Single operation within a trace |
| **Parent-Child** | Span relationship where the parent depends on the child |
| **Follows-From** | Causal relationship where originator doesn't wait for the result |
| **Span Link** | Non-hierarchical connection between spans, possibly across traces |
| **Deterministic ID** | Trace ID derived from domain data (e.g., tx_hash) instead of random |
| **Context** | Data propagated between services (`trace_id`, `span_id`, flags) |
| **Instrumentation** | Code that creates spans and propagates context |
| **Collector** | Service that receives, processes, and exports traces |
| **Backend** | Storage/visualization system (Tempo) |
| **Head Sampling** | Sampling decision at trace start |
| **Tail Sampling** | Sampling decision after trace completes |
---
_Next: [Architecture Analysis](./01-architecture-analysis.md)_ | _Back to: [Overview](./OpenTelemetryPlan.md)_

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,467 @@
# Architecture Analysis
> **Parent Document**: [OpenTelemetryPlan.md](./OpenTelemetryPlan.md)
> **Related**: [Design Decisions](./02-design-decisions.md) | [Implementation Strategy](./03-implementation-strategy.md)
---
## 1.1 Current xrpld Architecture Overview
> **WS** = WebSocket | **UNL** = Unique Node List | **TxQ** = Transaction Queue | **StatsD** = Statistics Daemon
The xrpld node software consists of several interconnected components that need instrumentation for distributed tracing:
```mermaid
flowchart TB
subgraph xrpld["xrpld Node"]
subgraph services["Core Services"]
RPC["RPC Server<br/>(HTTP/WS/gRPC)"]
Overlay["Overlay<br/>(P2P Network)"]
Consensus["Consensus<br/>(RCLConsensus)"]
ValidatorList["ValidatorList<br/>(UNL Mgmt)"]
end
JobQueue["JobQueue<br/>(Thread Pool)"]
subgraph processing["Processing Layer"]
NetworkOPs["NetworkOPs<br/>(Tx Processing)"]
LedgerMaster["LedgerMaster<br/>(Ledger Mgmt)"]
NodeStore["NodeStore<br/>(Database)"]
InboundLedgers["InboundLedgers<br/>(Ledger Sync)"]
end
subgraph appservices["Application Services"]
PathFind["PathFinding<br/>(Payment Paths)"]
TxQ["TxQ<br/>(Fee Escalation)"]
LoadMgr["LoadManager<br/>(Fee/Load)"]
end
subgraph observability["Existing Observability"]
PerfLog["PerfLog<br/>(JSON)"]
Insight["Insight<br/>(StatsD)"]
Logging["Logging<br/>(Journal)"]
end
services --> JobQueue
JobQueue --> processing
JobQueue --> appservices
end
style xrpld fill:#424242,stroke:#212121,color:#ffffff
style services fill:#1565c0,stroke:#0d47a1,color:#ffffff
style processing fill:#2e7d32,stroke:#1b5e20,color:#ffffff
style appservices fill:#6a1b9a,stroke:#4a148c,color:#ffffff
style observability fill:#e65100,stroke:#bf360c,color:#ffffff
```
**Reading the diagram:**
- **Core Services (blue)**: The entry points into xrpld -- RPC Server handles client requests, Overlay manages peer-to-peer networking, Consensus drives agreement, and ValidatorList manages trusted validators.
- **JobQueue (center)**: The asynchronous thread pool that decouples Core Services from the Processing and Application layers. All work flows through it.
- **Processing Layer (green)**: Core business logic -- NetworkOPs processes transactions, LedgerMaster manages ledger state, NodeStore handles persistence, and InboundLedgers synchronizes missing data.
- **Application Services (purple)**: Higher-level features -- PathFinding computes payment routes, TxQ manages fee-based queuing, and LoadManager tracks server load.
- **Existing Observability (orange)**: The current monitoring stack (PerfLog, Insight, Journal logging) that OpenTelemetry will complement, not replace.
- **Arrows (Services to JobQueue to layers)**: Work originates at Core Services, is enqueued onto the JobQueue, and dispatched to Processing or Application layers for execution.
---
## 1.1.1 Actors and Actions
### Actors
| Who (Plain English) | Technical Term |
| ----------------------------------------- | -------------------------- |
| Network node running XRPL software | xrpld node |
| External client submitting requests | RPC Client |
| Network neighbor sharing data | Peer (PeerImp) |
| Request handler for client queries | RPC Server (ServerHandler) |
| Command executor for specific RPC methods | RPCHandler |
| Agreement process between nodes | Consensus (RCLConsensus) |
| Transaction processing coordinator | NetworkOPs |
| Background task scheduler | JobQueue |
| Ledger state manager | LedgerMaster |
| Payment route calculator | PathFinding (Pathfinder) |
| Transaction waiting room | TxQ (Transaction Queue) |
| Fee adjustment system | LoadManager |
| Trusted validator list manager | ValidatorList |
| Protocol upgrade tracker | AmendmentTable |
| Ledger state hash tree | SHAMap |
| Persistent key-value storage | NodeStore |
### Actions
| What Happens (Plain English) | Technical Term |
| ---------------------------------------------- | ---------------------- |
| Client sends a request to a node | `rpc.request` |
| Node executes a specific RPC command | `rpc.command.*` |
| Node receives a transaction from a peer | `tx.receive` |
| Node checks if a transaction is valid | `tx.validate` |
| Node forwards a transaction to neighbors | `tx.relay` |
| Nodes agree on which transactions to include | `consensus.round` |
| Consensus progresses through phases | `consensus.phase.*` |
| Node builds a new confirmed ledger | `ledger.build` |
| Node fetches missing ledger data from peers | `ledger.acquire` |
| Node computes payment routes | `pathfind.compute` |
| Node queues a transaction for later processing | `txq.enqueue` |
| Node increases fees due to high load | `fee.escalate` |
| Node fetches the latest trusted validator list | `validator.list.fetch` |
| Node votes on a protocol amendment | `amendment.vote` |
| Node synchronizes state tree data | `shamap.sync` |
---
## 1.2 Key Components for Instrumentation
> **TxQ** = Transaction Queue | **UNL** = Unique Node List
| Component | Location | Purpose | Trace Value |
| ------------------ | ------------------------------------------ | ------------------------ | -------------------------------- |
| **Overlay** | `src/xrpld/overlay/` | P2P communication | Message propagation timing |
| **PeerImp** | `src/xrpld/overlay/detail/PeerImp.cpp` | Individual peer handling | Per-peer latency |
| **RCLConsensus** | `src/xrpld/app/consensus/RCLConsensus.cpp` | Consensus algorithm | Round timing, phase analysis |
| **NetworkOPs** | `src/xrpld/app/misc/NetworkOPs.cpp` | Transaction processing | Tx lifecycle tracking |
| **ServerHandler** | `src/xrpld/rpc/detail/ServerHandler.cpp` | RPC entry point | Request latency |
| **RPCHandler** | `src/xrpld/rpc/detail/RPCHandler.cpp` | Command execution | Per-command timing |
| **JobQueue** | `src/xrpl/core/JobQueue.h` | Async task execution | Queue wait times |
| **PathFinding** | `src/xrpld/app/paths/` | Payment path computation | Path latency, cache hits |
| **TxQ** | `src/xrpld/app/misc/TxQ.cpp` | Transaction queue/fees | Queue depth, eviction rates |
| **LoadManager** | `src/xrpld/app/main/LoadManager.cpp` | Fee escalation/load | Fee levels, load factors |
| **InboundLedgers** | `src/xrpld/app/ledger/InboundLedgers.cpp` | Ledger acquisition | Sync time, peer reliability |
| **ValidatorList** | `src/xrpld/app/misc/ValidatorList.cpp` | UNL management | List freshness, fetch failures |
| **AmendmentTable** | `src/xrpld/app/misc/AmendmentTable.cpp` | Protocol amendments | Voting status, activation events |
| **SHAMap** | `src/xrpld/shamap/` | State hash tree | Sync speed, missing nodes |
---
## 1.3 Transaction Flow Diagram
Transaction flow spans multiple nodes in the network. Each node creates linked spans to form a distributed trace:
```mermaid
sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant PeerA as Peer A (Receive)
participant PeerB as Peer B (Relay)
participant PeerC as Peer C (Validate)
Client->>PeerA: 1. Submit TX
rect rgb(230, 245, 255)
Note over PeerA: tx.receive SPAN START
PeerA->>PeerA: HashRouter Deduplication
PeerA->>PeerA: tx.validate (child span)
end
PeerA->>PeerB: 2. Relay TX (with trace ctx)
rect rgb(230, 245, 255)
Note over PeerB: tx.receive (linked span)
end
PeerB->>PeerC: 3. Relay TX
rect rgb(230, 245, 255)
Note over PeerC: tx.receive (linked span)
PeerC->>PeerC: tx.process
end
Note over Client,PeerC: DISTRIBUTED TRACE (same trace_id: abc123)
```
**Reading the diagram:**
- **Client**: The external entity that submits a transaction to Peer A. It has no trace context -- the trace starts at the first node.
- **Peer A (Receive)**: The entry node that creates the root span `tx.receive`, runs HashRouter deduplication to avoid processing duplicates, and creates a child `tx.validate` span.
- **Peer A to Peer B arrow**: The relay message carries trace context (trace_id + parent span_id), enabling Peer B to create a linked span under the same trace.
- **Peer B (Relay)**: Receives the transaction and trace context, creates a `tx.receive` span linked to Peer A's trace, then relays onward.
- **Peer C (Validate)**: Final hop in this example. Creates a linked `tx.receive` span and runs `tx.process` to fully process the transaction.
- **Blue rectangles**: Highlight the span boundaries on each node, showing where instrumentation creates and closes spans.
### Trace Structure
```
trace_id: abc123
├── span: tx.receive (Peer A)
│ ├── span: tx.validate
│ └── span: tx.relay
├── span: tx.receive (Peer B) [parent: Peer A]
│ └── span: tx.relay
└── span: tx.receive (Peer C) [parent: Peer B]
└── span: tx.process
```
---
## 1.4 Consensus Round Flow
Consensus rounds are multi-phase operations that benefit significantly from tracing:
```mermaid
flowchart TB
subgraph round["consensus.round (root span)"]
attrs["Attributes:<br/>ledger_seq = 12345678<br/>consensus_mode = proposing<br/>proposers = 35"]
subgraph open["consensus.phase.open"]
open_desc["Duration: ~3s<br/>Waiting for transactions"]
end
subgraph establish["consensus.phase.establish"]
est_attrs["proposals_received = 28<br/>disputes_resolved = 3"]
est_children["├── consensus.proposal.receive (×28)<br/>├── consensus.proposal.send (×1)<br/>└── consensus.dispute.resolve (×3)"]
end
subgraph accept["consensus.phase.accept"]
acc_attrs["transactions_applied = 150<br/>ledger_hash = DEF456..."]
acc_children["├── ledger.build<br/>└── ledger.validate"]
end
attrs --> open
open --> establish
establish --> accept
end
style round fill:#f57f17,stroke:#e65100,color:#ffffff
style open fill:#1565c0,stroke:#0d47a1,color:#ffffff
style establish fill:#2e7d32,stroke:#1b5e20,color:#ffffff
style accept fill:#c2185b,stroke:#880e4f,color:#ffffff
```
**Reading the diagram:**
- **consensus.round (orange, root span)**: The top-level span encompassing the entire consensus round, with attributes like ledger sequence, mode, and proposer count.
- **consensus.phase.open (blue)**: The first phase where the node waits (~3s) to collect incoming transactions before proposing.
- **consensus.phase.establish (green)**: The negotiation phase where validators exchange proposals, resolve disputes, and converge on a transaction set. Child spans track each proposal received/sent and each dispute resolved.
- **consensus.phase.accept (pink)**: The final phase where the agreed transaction set is applied, a new ledger is built, and the ledger is validated. Child spans cover `ledger.build` and `ledger.validate`.
- **Arrows (open to establish to accept)**: The sequential flow through the three consensus phases. Each phase must complete before the next begins.
---
## 1.5 RPC Request Flow
> **WS** = WebSocket
RPC requests support W3C Trace Context headers for distributed tracing across services:
```mermaid
flowchart TB
subgraph request["rpc.request (root span)"]
http["HTTP Request — POST /<br/>traceparent:<br/>00-abc123...-def456...-01"]
attrs["Attributes:<br/>http.method = POST<br/>net.peer.ip = 192.168.1.100<br/>command = submit"]
subgraph enqueue["jobqueue.enqueue"]
job_attr["job_type = jtCLIENT_RPC"]
end
subgraph command["rpc.command.submit"]
cmd_attrs["version = 2<br/>rpc_role = user"]
cmd_children["├── tx.deserialize<br/>├── tx.validate_local<br/>└── tx.submit_to_network"]
end
response["Response: 200 OK<br/>Duration: 45ms"]
http --> attrs
attrs --> enqueue
enqueue --> command
command --> response
end
style request fill:#2e7d32,stroke:#1b5e20,color:#ffffff
style enqueue fill:#1565c0,stroke:#0d47a1,color:#ffffff
style command fill:#e65100,stroke:#bf360c,color:#ffffff
```
**Reading the diagram:**
- **rpc.request (green, root span)**: The outermost span representing the full RPC request lifecycle, from HTTP receipt to response. Carries the W3C `traceparent` header for distributed tracing.
- **HTTP Request node**: Shows the incoming POST request with its `traceparent` header and extracted attributes (method, peer IP, command name).
- **jobqueue.enqueue (blue)**: The span covering the asynchronous handoff from the RPC thread to the JobQueue worker thread. The trace context is preserved across this async boundary.
- **rpc.command.submit (orange)**: The span for the actual command execution, with child spans for deserialization, local validation, and network submission.
- **Response node**: The final output with HTTP status and total duration, marking the end of the root span.
- **Arrows (top to bottom)**: The sequential processing pipeline -- receive request, extract attributes, enqueue job, execute command, return response.
---
## 1.6 Key Trace Points
> **TxQ** = Transaction Queue
The following table identifies priority instrumentation points across the codebase:
| Category | Span Name | File | Method | Priority |
| --------------- | ---------------------- | ---------------------- | ----------------------- | -------- |
| **Transaction** | `tx.receive` | `PeerImp.cpp` | `handleTransaction()` | High |
| **Transaction** | `tx.validate` | `NetworkOPs.cpp` | `processTransaction()` | High |
| **Transaction** | `tx.process` | `NetworkOPs.cpp` | `doTransactionSync()` | High |
| **Transaction** | `tx.relay` | `OverlayImpl.cpp` | `relay()` | Medium |
| **Consensus** | `consensus.round` | `RCLConsensus.cpp` | `startRound()` | High |
| **Consensus** | `consensus.phase.*` | `Consensus.h` | `timerEntry()` | High |
| **Consensus** | `consensus.proposal.*` | `RCLConsensus.cpp` | `peerProposal()` | Medium |
| **RPC** | `rpc.request` | `ServerHandler.cpp` | `onRequest()` | High |
| **RPC** | `rpc.command.*` | `RPCHandler.cpp` | `doCommand()` | High |
| **Peer** | `peer.connect` | `OverlayImpl.cpp` | `onHandoff()` | Low |
| **Peer** | `peer.message.*` | `PeerImp.cpp` | `onMessage()` | Low |
| **Ledger** | `ledger.acquire` | `InboundLedgers.cpp` | `acquire()` | Medium |
| **Ledger** | `ledger.build` | `RCLConsensus.cpp` | `buildLCL()` | High |
| **PathFinding** | `pathfind.request` | `PathRequest.cpp` | `doUpdate()` | High |
| **PathFinding** | `pathfind.compute` | `Pathfinder.cpp` | `findPaths()` | High |
| **TxQ** | `txq.enqueue` | `TxQ.cpp` | `apply()` | High |
| **TxQ** | `txq.apply` | `TxQ.cpp` | `processClosedLedger()` | High |
| **Fee** | `fee.escalate` | `LoadManager.cpp` | `raiseLocalFee()` | Medium |
| **Ledger** | `ledger.replay` | `LedgerReplayer.h` | `replay()` | Medium |
| **Ledger** | `ledger.delta` | `LedgerDeltaAcquire.h` | `processData()` | Medium |
| **Validator** | `validator.list.fetch` | `ValidatorList.cpp` | `verify()` | Medium |
| **Validator** | `validator.manifest` | `Manifest.cpp` | `applyManifest()` | Low |
| **Amendment** | `amendment.vote` | `AmendmentTable.cpp` | `doVoting()` | Low |
| **SHAMap** | `shamap.sync` | `SHAMap.cpp` | `fetchRoot()` | Medium |
---
## 1.7 Instrumentation Priority
> **TxQ** = Transaction Queue
```mermaid
quadrantChart
title Instrumentation Priority Matrix
x-axis Low Complexity --> High Complexity
y-axis Low Value --> High Value
quadrant-1 Implement First
quadrant-2 Plan Carefully
quadrant-3 Quick Wins
quadrant-4 Consider Later
RPC Tracing: [0.2, 0.92]
Transaction Tracing: [0.55, 0.88]
Consensus Tracing: [0.78, 0.82]
PathFinding: [0.38, 0.75]
TxQ and Fees: [0.25, 0.65]
Ledger Sync: [0.62, 0.58]
Peer Message Tracing: [0.35, 0.25]
JobQueue Tracing: [0.2, 0.48]
Validator Mgmt: [0.48, 0.42]
Amendment Tracking: [0.15, 0.32]
SHAMap Operations: [0.72, 0.45]
```
---
## 1.8 Observable Outcomes
> **TxQ** = Transaction Queue | **UNL** = Unique Node List
After implementing OpenTelemetry, operators and developers will gain visibility into the following:
### 1.8.1 What You Will See: Traces
| Trace Type | Description | Example Query in Grafana/Tempo |
| -------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------- |
| **Transaction Lifecycle** | Full journey from RPC submission through validation, relay, consensus, and ledger inclusion | `{service.name="xrpld" && tx_hash="ABC123..."}` |
| **Cross-Node Propagation** | Transaction path across multiple xrpld nodes with timing | `{relay_count > 0}` |
| **Consensus Rounds** | Complete round with all phases (open, establish, accept) | `{span.name=~"consensus.round.*"}` |
| **RPC Request Processing** | Individual command execution with timing breakdown | `{command="account_info"}` |
| **Ledger Acquisition** | Peer-to-peer ledger data requests and responses | `{span.name="ledger.acquire"}` |
| **PathFinding Latency** | Path computation time and cache effectiveness for payment RPCs | `{span.name="pathfind.compute"}` |
| **TxQ Behavior** | Queue depth, eviction patterns, fee escalation during congestion | `{span.name=~"txq.*"}` |
| **Ledger Sync** | Full acquisition timeline including delta and transaction fetches | `{span.name=~"ledger.acquire.*"}` |
| **Validator Health** | UNL fetch success, manifest updates, stale list detection | `{span.name=~"validator.*"}` |
### 1.8.2 What You Will See: Metrics (Derived from Traces)
| Metric | Description | Dashboard Panel |
| ----------------------------- | --------------------------------------- | --------------------------- |
| **RPC Latency (p50/p95/p99)** | Response time distribution per command | Heatmap by command |
| **Transaction Throughput** | Transactions processed per second | Time series graph |
| **Consensus Round Duration** | Time to complete consensus phases | Histogram |
| **Cross-Node Latency** | Time for transaction to reach N nodes | Line chart with percentiles |
| **Error Rate** | Failed transactions/RPC calls by type | Stacked bar chart |
| **PathFinding Latency** | Path computation time per currency pair | Heatmap by currency |
| **TxQ Depth** | Queued transactions over time | Time series with thresholds |
| **Fee Escalation Level** | Current fee multiplier | Gauge with alert thresholds |
| **Ledger Sync Duration** | Time to acquire missing ledgers | Histogram |
### 1.8.3 Concrete Dashboard Examples
**Transaction Trace View (Tempo):**
```
┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Trace: abc123... (Transaction Submission) Duration: 847ms │
├────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ ├── rpc.request [ServerHandler] ████░░░░░░ 45ms │
│ │ └── rpc.command.submit [RPCHandler] ████░░░░░░ 42ms │
│ │ └── tx.receive [NetworkOPs] ███░░░░░░░ 35ms │
│ │ ├── tx.validate [TxQ] █░░░░░░░░░ 8ms │
│ │ └── tx.relay [Overlay] ██░░░░░░░░ 15ms │
│ │ ├── tx.receive [Node-B] █████░░░░░ 52ms │
│ │ │ └── tx.relay [Node-B] ██░░░░░░░░ 18ms │
│ │ └── tx.receive [Node-C] ██████░░░░ 65ms │
│ └── consensus.round [RCLConsensus] ████████░░ 720ms │
│ ├── consensus.phase.open ██░░░░░░░░ 180ms │
│ ├── consensus.phase.establish █████░░░░░ 480ms │
│ └── consensus.phase.accept █░░░░░░░░░ 60ms │
└────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
```
**RPC Performance Dashboard Panel:**
```
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ RPC Command Latency (Last 1 Hour) │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Command │ p50 │ p95 │ p99 │ Errors │ Rate │
│──────────────────┼────────┼────────┼────────┼────────┼──────│
│ account_info │ 12ms │ 45ms │ 89ms │ 0.1% │ 150/s│
│ submit │ 35ms │ 120ms │ 250ms │ 2.3% │ 45/s│
│ ledger │ 8ms │ 25ms │ 55ms │ 0.0% │ 80/s│
│ tx │ 15ms │ 50ms │ 100ms │ 0.5% │ 60/s│
│ server_info │ 5ms │ 12ms │ 20ms │ 0.0% │ 200/s│
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
```
**Consensus Health Dashboard Panel:**
```mermaid
---
config:
xyChart:
width: 1200
height: 400
plotReservedSpacePercent: 50
chartOrientation: vertical
themeVariables:
xyChart:
plotColorPalette: "#3498db"
---
xychart-beta
title "Consensus Round Duration (Last 24 Hours)"
x-axis "Time of Day (Hours)" [0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24]
y-axis "Duration (seconds)" 1 --> 5
line [2.1, 2.4, 2.8, 3.2, 3.8, 4.3, 4.5, 5.0, 4.7, 4.0, 3.2, 2.6, 2.0]
```
### 1.8.4 Operator Actionable Insights
| Scenario | What You'll See | Action |
| ------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------ |
| **Slow RPC** | Span showing which phase is slow (parsing, execution, serialization) | Optimize specific code path |
| **Transaction Stuck** | Trace stops at validation; error attribute shows reason | Fix transaction parameters |
| **Consensus Delay** | Phase.establish taking too long; proposer attribute shows missing validators | Investigate network connectivity |
| **Memory Spike** | Large batch of spans correlating with memory increase | Tune batch_size or sampling |
| **Network Partition** | Traces missing cross-node links for specific peer | Check peer connectivity |
| **Path Computation Slow** | pathfind.compute span shows high latency; cache miss rate in attributes | Warm the RippleLineCache, check order book depth |
| **TxQ Full** | txq.enqueue spans show evictions; fee.escalate spans increasing | Monitor fee levels, alert operators |
| **Ledger Sync Stalled** | ledger.acquire spans timing out; peer reliability attributes show issues | Check peer connectivity, add trusted peers |
| **UNL Stale** | validator.list.fetch spans failing; last_update attribute aging | Verify validator site URLs, check DNS |
### 1.8.5 Developer Debugging Workflow
1. **Find Transaction**: Query by `tx_hash` to get full trace
2. **Identify Bottleneck**: Look at span durations to find slowest component
3. **Check Attributes**: Review `validity`, `rpc_status` for errors
4. **Correlate Logs**: Use `trace_id` to find related PerfLog entries
5. **Compare Nodes**: Filter by `service.instance.id` to compare behavior across nodes
---
_Next: [Design Decisions](./02-design-decisions.md)_ | _Back to: [Overview](./OpenTelemetryPlan.md)_

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,568 @@
# Design Decisions
> **Parent Document**: [OpenTelemetryPlan.md](./OpenTelemetryPlan.md)
> **Related**: [Architecture Analysis](./01-architecture-analysis.md)
---
## 2.1 OpenTelemetry Components
> **OTLP** = OpenTelemetry Protocol
### 2.1.1 SDK Selection
**Primary Choice**: OpenTelemetry C++ SDK (`opentelemetry-cpp`)
| Component | Purpose | Required |
| --------------------------------------- | ---------------------- | ------------------------- |
| `opentelemetry-cpp::api` | Tracing API headers | Yes |
| `opentelemetry-cpp::sdk` | SDK implementation | Yes |
| `opentelemetry-cpp::ext` | Extensions (exporters) | Yes |
| `opentelemetry-cpp::otlp_http_exporter` | OTLP/HTTP export | Yes (shipped in Phase 1b) |
| `opentelemetry-cpp::otlp_grpc_exporter` | OTLP/gRPC export | Future (not yet wired up) |
### 2.1.2 Instrumentation Strategy
**Manual Instrumentation** (recommended):
| Approach | Pros | Cons |
| ---------- | --------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------- |
| **Manual** | Precise control, optimized placement, xrpld-specific attributes | More development effort |
| **Auto** | Less code, automatic coverage | Less control, potential overhead, limited customization |
---
## 2.2 Exporter Configuration
> **OTLP** = OpenTelemetry Protocol
```mermaid
flowchart TB
subgraph nodes["xrpld Nodes"]
node1["xrpld<br/>Node 1"]
node2["xrpld<br/>Node 2"]
node3["xrpld<br/>Node 3"]
end
collector["OpenTelemetry<br/>Collector<br/>(sidecar or standalone)"]
subgraph backends["Observability Backends"]
tempo["Tempo"]
elastic["Elastic<br/>APM"]
end
node1 -->|"OTLP/HTTP<br/>:4318"| collector
node2 -->|"OTLP/HTTP<br/>:4318"| collector
node3 -->|"OTLP/HTTP<br/>:4318"| collector
collector --> tempo
collector --> elastic
style nodes fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#ffffff
style backends fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#ffffff
style collector fill:#bf360c,stroke:#8c2809,color:#ffffff
```
**Reading the diagram:**
- **xrpld Nodes (blue)**: The source of telemetry data. Each xrpld node exports spans via OTLP/HTTP on port 4318 (the only exporter shipped in Phase 1b).
- **OpenTelemetry Collector (red)**: The central aggregation point that receives spans from all nodes. Can run as a sidecar (per-node) or standalone (shared). Handles batching, filtering, and routing.
- **Observability Backends (green)**: The storage and visualization destinations. Tempo is the recommended backend for both development and production, and Elastic APM is an alternative. The Collector routes to one or more backends.
- **Arrows (nodes to collector to backends)**: The data pipeline -- spans flow from nodes to the Collector over HTTP, then the Collector fans out to the configured backends.
### 2.2.1 OTLP/HTTP (Shipped in Phase 1b)
OTLP/HTTP is the only exporter wired up in Phase 1b. It is configured via
`OtlpHttpExporterOptions` with the collector traces endpoint
(`http://localhost:4318/v1/traces` by default) and a JSON content type
(binary protobuf is also available).
### 2.2.2 OTLP/gRPC (Future Work — Planned Upgrade)
OTLP/gRPC is planned as a future upgrade from the HTTP exporter. The gRPC
transport offers lower per-span overhead and tighter back-pressure semantics
than HTTP/JSON, making it attractive for production deployments once the HTTP
path is validated in earlier phases.
Required to land this upgrade:
1. Add `opentelemetry-cpp::otlp_grpc_exporter` to the Conan recipe (the
dependency already exists but is not linked in Phase 1b builds).
2. Extend `TelemetryConfig.cpp` to parse an `exporter` key (`otlp_http`
default, `otlp_grpc` opt-in) and a gRPC endpoint override.
3. In `Telemetry::start()` branch on the parsed exporter type and construct
either `OtlpHttpExporterFactory::Create(httpOpts)` or
`OtlpGrpcExporterFactory::Create(grpcOpts)` accordingly.
4. Update the runbook and dashboards to document the alternate port and TLS
settings.
When wired up, the gRPC path will use `OtlpGrpcExporterOptions` configured with
the collector endpoint (host on port 4317), TLS credentials enabled, and a CA
certificate path.
Until that work lands, `OtlpGrpcExporterOptions` is **not** used by any code
path in Phase 1b through Phase 5.
---
## 2.3 Span Naming Conventions
> **TxQ** = Transaction Queue | **UNL** = Unique Node List | **WS** = WebSocket
### 2.3.1 Naming Schema
```
<component>.<operation>[.<sub-operation>]
```
**Examples**:
- `tx.receive` - Transaction received from peer
- `consensus.phase.establish` - Consensus establish phase
- `rpc.command.server_info` - server_info RPC command
### 2.3.2 Complete Span Catalog
| Span name | Description |
| ------------------------------ | --------------------------------------- |
| `tx.receive` | Transaction received from network |
| `tx.validate` | Transaction signature/format validation |
| `tx.process` | Full transaction processing |
| `tx.relay` | Transaction relay to peers |
| `tx.apply` | Apply transaction to ledger |
| `consensus.round` | Complete consensus round |
| `consensus.phase.open` | Open phase - collecting transactions |
| `consensus.phase.establish` | Establish phase - reaching agreement |
| `consensus.phase.accept` | Accept phase - applying consensus |
| `consensus.proposal.receive` | Receive peer proposal |
| `consensus.proposal.send` | Send our proposal |
| `consensus.validation.receive` | Receive peer validation |
| `consensus.validation.send` | Send our validation |
| `rpc.request` | HTTP/WebSocket request handling |
| `rpc.command.*` | Specific RPC command (dynamic) |
| `peer.connect` | Peer connection establishment |
| `peer.disconnect` | Peer disconnection |
| `peer.message.send` | Send protocol message |
| `peer.message.receive` | Receive protocol message |
| `ledger.acquire` | Ledger acquisition from network |
| `ledger.build` | Build new ledger |
| `ledger.validate` | Ledger validation |
| `ledger.close` | Close ledger |
| `ledger.replay` | Ledger replay executed |
| `ledger.delta` | Delta-based ledger acquired |
| `pathfind.request` | Path request initiated |
| `pathfind.compute` | Path computation executed |
| `txq.enqueue` | Transaction queued |
| `txq.apply` | Queued transaction applied |
| `fee.escalate` | Fee escalation triggered |
| `validator.list.fetch` | UNL list fetched |
| `validator.manifest` | Manifest update processed |
| `amendment.vote` | Amendment voting executed |
| `shamap.sync` | State tree synchronization |
| `job.enqueue` | Job added to queue |
| `job.execute` | Job execution |
### 2.3.3 Attribute Naming Conventions
Span **names** follow §2.3.1 (dotted `<component>.<operation>`). Span
**attribute keys** follow the rules below. The constants in the `*SpanNames.h`
headers are the single source of truth; the collector, Tempo, the Grafana
dashboards, and the runbook all consume these exact keys, so every layer must
agree with the code. A CI check enforces this end to end.
1. **Per-span unique attribute** → bare field name, allowed when the field is
recorded by a single span/workflow so the span name already supplies the
domain (e.g. `command`, `version`, `local` on `rpc.command`).
2. **Shared attribute (same concept on more than one span)** → ONE key, reused
verbatim on every span that records it; the span name tells the occurrences
apart, so no per-emitter prefix is added. Name it by the field's meaning: a
property of a domain object keeps that object's bare field name (`ledger_hash`,
`ledger_seq`, `tx_hash`, `peer_id`, `full_validation`); a field already
qualified by a sub-kind keeps that qualifier on every emitter (`proposal_trusted`
on both `consensus.proposal.receive` and `peer.proposal.receive`;
`validation_trusted` likewise). Defined once in the base `SpanNames.h`
`namespace attr` block and re-exported (`using`) by each domain header.
3. **Collision qualifier**`<domain>_<field>`, only when a bare name would
collide with a DIFFERENT concept in the shared spanmetrics label space or with
the OTel-reserved `status` key (e.g. `rpc_status`, `grpc_status`,
`consensus_phase`, `consensus_round`, `consensus_mode`). This disambiguates
distinct concepts that share a word; it is NOT used to tag the same concept
with its emitting workflow — that is rule 2 (one shared name).
4. **Resource attribute** → dotted `xrpl.<subsystem>.<field>`, reserved ONLY
for process/network identity set once at startup (`xrpl.network.id`,
`xrpl.network.type`). Span attributes are never dotted in the `xrpl.` form —
it blurs the resource/span scope boundary and parses awkwardly in TraceQL.
5. **Span names** use `<subsystem>[.<component>]` (dotted, per §2.3.1). Only
attribute _keys_ follow rules 14.
Standard OpenTelemetry semantic-convention keys keep their canonical dotted
form (e.g. `service.*` resource attributes, `http.*` span attributes); the
"no dotted form" rule applies to xrpl-custom keys only.
The same rules are recorded in `CONTRIBUTING.md` (the permanent home, since
`OpenTelemetryPlan/` is removed once the rollout completes). The attribute
examples in §2.4 below follow these rules.
---
## 2.4 Attribute Schema
> **TxQ** = Transaction Queue | **UNL** = Unique Node List | **OTLP** = OpenTelemetry Protocol
### 2.4.1 Resource Attributes (Set Once at Startup)
Resource attributes identify the process and are set once at startup. They use
the standard OpenTelemetry semantic conventions plus custom dotted `xrpl.*`
keys (the dotted form is reserved for resource scope per §2.3.3).
| Key | Type / value | Description |
| --------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------ |
| `service.name` | `"xrpld"` | Standard `SERVICE_NAME` |
| `service.version` | `BuildInfo::getVersionString()` | Standard `SERVICE_VERSION` |
| `service.instance.id` | node public key (base58) | Standard `SERVICE_INSTANCE_ID` |
| `xrpl.network.id` | network id (e.g. 0 for mainnet) | Network identifier |
| `xrpl.network.type` | `"mainnet"` \| `"testnet"` \| `"devnet"` \| `"unknown"` | Network kind |
| `xrpl.node.type` | `"validator"` \| `"stock"` \| `"reporting"` | Node role |
| `xrpl.node.cluster` | cluster name | Cluster name, if clustered |
### 2.4.2 Span Attributes by Category
> Span attribute keys use the underscore form from §2.3.3 (shared/qualified
> keys are `<domain>_<field>`; per-span unique keys are bare). The dotted form
> is reserved for the resource attributes in §2.4.1 above. This catalog lists
> the planned attribute set by category; the exact emitted key for each
> implemented span is defined by the `*SpanNames.h` constants, which are the
> single source of truth where the two differ.
#### Transaction Attributes
| Key | Type | Description |
| -------------- | ------ | ------------------------------------- |
| `tx_hash` | string | Transaction hash (hex) |
| `tx_type` | string | `"Payment"`, `"OfferCreate"`, etc. |
| `tx_account` | string | Source account (redacted in prod) |
| `tx_sequence` | int64 | Account sequence number |
| `tx_fee` | int64 | Fee in drops |
| `tx_result` | string | `"tesSUCCESS"`, `"tecPATH_DRY"`, etc. |
| `ledger_index` | int64 | Ledger containing transaction |
| `relay_count` | int64 | Peers the transaction was relayed to |
| `suppressed` | bool | `true` when HashRouter dropped a dup |
#### Consensus Attributes
| Key | Type | Description |
| -------------------- | ------- | ----------------------------------- |
| `consensus_round` | int64 | Round number |
| `consensus_phase` | string | `"open"`, `"establish"`, `"accept"` |
| `consensus_mode` | string | `"proposing"`, `"observing"`, etc. |
| `proposers` | int64 | Number of proposers |
| `prev_ledger_prefix` | string | Previous ledger hash prefix |
| `ledger_seq` | int64 | Ledger sequence |
| `tx_count` | int64 | Transactions in consensus set |
| `round_time_ms` | float64 | Round duration |
#### RPC Attributes
| Key | Type | Description |
| ------------- | ------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| `command` | string | Command name (per-span unique on `rpc.command`) |
| `version` | int64 | API version |
| `rpc_role` | string | `"admin"` or `"user"` (qualified — `role` is generic) |
| `params` | string | Sanitized parameters (optional) |
| `rpc_status` | string | Response status: `success` \| `error` (qualified — `status` is OTel-reserved) |
| `duration_ms` | float64 | Request duration in milliseconds |
#### Peer & Message Attributes
| Key | Type | Description |
| -------------------- | ------- | -------------------------- |
| `peer_id` | string | Peer public key (base58) |
| `peer_address` | string | IP:port |
| `peer_latency_ms` | float64 | Measured latency |
| `peer_cluster` | string | Cluster name if clustered |
| `message_type` | string | Protocol message type name |
| `message_size_bytes` | int64 | Message size |
| `message_compressed` | bool | Whether compressed |
#### Ledger & Job Attributes
| Key | Type | Description |
| ----------------- | ------- | --------------------- |
| `ledger_hash` | string | Ledger hash |
| `ledger_index` | int64 | Ledger sequence/index |
| `close_time` | int64 | Close time (epoch) |
| `ledger_tx_count` | int64 | Transaction count |
| `job_type` | string | Job type name |
| `job_queue_ms` | float64 | Time spent in queue |
| `job_worker` | int64 | Worker thread ID |
#### PathFinding Attributes
| Key | Type | Description |
| -------------------------- | ------ | ------------------------- |
| `pathfind_source_currency` | string | Source currency code |
| `pathfind_dest_currency` | string | Destination currency code |
| `pathfind_path_count` | int64 | Number of paths found |
| `pathfind_cache_hit` | bool | RippleLineCache hit |
#### TxQ Attributes
| Key | Type | Description |
| --------------------- | ------ | --------------------------- |
| `txq_queue_depth` | int64 | Current queue depth |
| `txq_fee_level` | int64 | Fee level of transaction |
| `txq_eviction_reason` | string | Why transaction was evicted |
#### Fee Attributes
| Key | Type | Description |
| ---------------------- | ----- | ------------------------- |
| `fee_load_factor` | int64 | Current load factor |
| `fee_escalation_level` | int64 | Fee escalation multiplier |
#### Validator Attributes
| Key | Type | Description |
| ------------------------ | ----- | ------------------------- |
| `validator_list_size` | int64 | UNL size |
| `validator_list_age_sec` | int64 | Seconds since last update |
#### Amendment Attributes
| Key | Type | Description |
| ------------------ | ------ | -------------------------------------- |
| `amendment_name` | string | Amendment name |
| `amendment_status` | string | `"enabled"`, `"vetoed"`, `"supported"` |
#### SHAMap Attributes
| Key | Type | Description |
| ---------------------- | ------- | --------------------------------------------- |
| `shamap_type` | string | `"transaction"`, `"state"`, `"account_state"` |
| `shamap_missing_nodes` | int64 | Number of missing nodes during sync |
| `shamap_duration_ms` | float64 | Sync duration |
### 2.4.3 Data Collection Summary
The following table summarizes what data is collected by category:
| Category | Attributes Collected | Purpose |
| --------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------- |
| **Transaction** | `tx_hash`, `tx_type`, `tx_result`, `tx_fee`, `ledger_index` | Trace transaction lifecycle |
| **Consensus** | `consensus_round`, `consensus_phase`, `consensus_mode`, `proposers`, `round_time_ms` | Analyze consensus timing |
| **RPC** | `command`, `version`, `rpc_status`, `duration_ms` | Monitor RPC performance |
| **Peer** | `peer_id` (public key), `peer_latency_ms`, `message_type`, `message_size_bytes` | Network topology analysis |
| **Ledger** | `ledger_hash`, `ledger_index`, `close_time`, `ledger_tx_count` | Ledger progression tracking |
| **Job** | `job_type`, `job_queue_ms`, `job_worker` | JobQueue performance |
| **PathFinding** | `pathfind_source_currency`, `pathfind_dest_currency`, `pathfind_path_count`, `pathfind_cache_hit` | Payment path analysis |
| **TxQ** | `txq_queue_depth`, `txq_fee_level`, `txq_eviction_reason` | Queue depth and fee tracking |
| **Fee** | `fee_load_factor`, `fee_escalation_level` | Fee escalation monitoring |
| **Validator** | `validator_list_size`, `validator_list_age_sec` | UNL health monitoring |
| **Amendment** | `amendment_name`, `amendment_status` | Protocol upgrade tracking |
| **SHAMap** | `shamap_type`, `shamap_missing_nodes`, `shamap_duration_ms` | State tree sync performance |
### 2.4.4 Privacy & Sensitive Data Policy
> **PII** = Personally Identifiable Information
OpenTelemetry instrumentation is designed to collect **operational metadata only**, never sensitive content.
#### Data NOT Collected
The following data is explicitly **excluded** from telemetry collection:
| Excluded Data | Reason |
| ----------------------- | ----------------------------------------- |
| **Private Keys** | Never exposed; not relevant to tracing |
| **Account Balances** | Financial data; privacy sensitive |
| **Transaction Amounts** | Financial data; privacy sensitive |
| **Raw TX Payloads** | May contain sensitive memo/data fields |
| **Personal Data** | No PII collected |
| **IP Addresses** | Configurable; excluded by default in prod |
#### Privacy Protection Mechanisms
| Mechanism | Description |
| ----------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| **Account Hashing** | `tx_account` is hashed at collector level before storage |
| **Configurable Redaction** | Sensitive fields can be excluded via `[telemetry]` config section |
| **Collector Tail Sampling** | xrpld head sampling is fixed at 1.0 (every span emitted); the collector retains ~10% of non-error traces, reducing stored data exposure |
| **Local Control** | Node operators have full control over what gets exported |
| **No Raw Payloads** | Transaction content is never recorded, only metadata (hash, type, result) |
| **Collector-Level Filtering** | Additional redaction/hashing can be configured at OTel Collector |
#### Collector-Level Data Protection
The OpenTelemetry Collector can be configured (via an `attributes` processor)
to hash or redact sensitive attributes before export — for example, hashing
`tx_account`, deleting `peer_address` to drop IP addresses, and deleting
`params` to redact request parameters.
#### Configuration Options for Privacy
In `xrpld.cfg`, operators control data collection granularity through the
`[telemetry]` section. Besides `enabled`, per-component toggles
(`trace_transactions`, `trace_consensus`, `trace_rpc`, `trace_peer` — the last
often disabled due to high volume) select which spans are emitted, and
redaction flags (`redact_account` to hash account addresses, `redact_peer_address`
to remove peer IP addresses) control SDK-level redaction before export.
> **Note**: The `redact_account` configuration in `xrpld.cfg` controls SDK-level redaction before export, while collector-level filtering (see [Collector-Level Data Protection](#collector-level-data-protection) above) provides an additional defense-in-depth layer. Both can operate independently.
> **Key Principle**: Telemetry collects **operational metadata** (timing, counts, hashes) — never **sensitive content** (keys, balances, amounts, raw payloads).
---
## 2.5 Context Propagation Design
> **WS** = WebSocket
### 2.5.1 Propagation Boundaries
```mermaid
flowchart TB
subgraph http["HTTP/WebSocket (RPC)"]
w3c["W3C Trace Context Headers:<br/>traceparent:<br/>00-trace_id-span_id-flags<br/>tracestate: xrpld=..."]
end
subgraph protobuf["Protocol Buffers (P2P)"]
proto["message TraceContext {<br/> bytes trace_id = 1; // 16 bytes<br/> bytes span_id = 2; // 8 bytes<br/> uint32 trace_flags = 3;<br/> string trace_state = 4;<br/>}"]
end
subgraph jobqueue["JobQueue (Internal Async)"]
job["Context captured at job creation,<br/>restored at execution<br/><br/>class Job {<br/> otel::context::Context<br/> traceContext_;<br/>};"]
end
style http fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#ffffff
style protobuf fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#ffffff
style jobqueue fill:#bf360c,stroke:#8c2809,color:#ffffff
```
**Reading the diagram:**
- **HTTP/WebSocket - RPC (blue)**: For client-facing RPC requests, trace context is propagated using the W3C `traceparent` header. This is the standard approach and works with any OTel-compatible client.
- **Protocol Buffers - P2P (green)**: For peer-to-peer messages between xrpld nodes, trace context is embedded as a protobuf `TraceContext` message carrying trace_id, span_id, flags, and optional trace_state.
- **JobQueue - Internal Async (red)**: For asynchronous work within a single node, the OTel context is captured when a job is created and restored when the job executes on a worker thread. This bridges the async gap so spans remain linked.
---
## 2.6 Integration with Existing Observability
> **OTLP** = OpenTelemetry Protocol | **WS** = WebSocket
### 2.6.1 Existing Frameworks Comparison
xrpld already has two observability mechanisms. OpenTelemetry complements (not replaces) them:
| Aspect | PerfLog | Beast Insight (StatsD) | OpenTelemetry |
| --------------------- | ----------------------------- | ---------------------------- | ------------------------- |
| **Type** | Logging | Metrics | Distributed Tracing |
| **Data** | JSON log entries | Counters, gauges, histograms | Spans with context |
| **Scope** | Single node | Single node | **Cross-node** |
| **Output** | `perf.log` file | StatsD server | OTLP Collector |
| **Question answered** | "What happened on this node?" | "How many? How fast?" | "What was the journey?" |
| **Correlation** | By timestamp | By metric name | By `trace_id` |
| **Overhead** | Low (file I/O) | Low (UDP packets) | Low-Medium (configurable) |
### 2.6.2 What Each Framework Does Best
#### PerfLog
- **Purpose**: Detailed local event logging for RPC and job execution
- **Strengths**:
- Rich JSON output with timing data
- Already integrated in RPC handlers
- File-based, no external dependencies
- **Limitations**:
- Single-node only (no cross-node correlation)
- No parent-child relationships between events
- Manual log parsing required
A PerfLog entry is a JSON object with fields such as `time`, `method`,
`duration_us`, and `result`.
#### Beast Insight (StatsD)
- **Purpose**: Real-time metrics for monitoring dashboards
- **Strengths**:
- Aggregated metrics (counters, gauges, histograms)
- Low overhead (UDP, fire-and-forget)
- Good for alerting thresholds
- **Limitations**:
- No request-level detail
- No causal relationships
- Single-node perspective
In xrpld, Beast Insight is used through `increment` (counters), `gauge`
(point-in-time values), and `timing` (durations) calls.
#### OpenTelemetry (NEW)
- **Purpose**: Distributed request tracing across nodes
- **Strengths**:
- **Cross-node correlation** via `trace_id`
- Parent-child span relationships
- Rich attributes per span
- Industry standard (CNCF)
- **Limitations**:
- Requires collector infrastructure
- Higher complexity than logging
A span is created via `startSpan` (e.g. `"tx.relay"`), annotated with
attributes such as `tx_hash` and `peer_id`, and is automatically linked to its
parent through the active context.
### 2.6.3 When to Use Each
| Scenario | PerfLog | StatsD | OpenTelemetry |
| --------------------------------------- | ---------- | ------ | ------------- |
| "How many TXs per second?" | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ |
| "What's the p99 RPC latency?" | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ |
| "Why was this specific TX slow?" | ⚠️ partial | ❌ | ✅ |
| "Which node delayed consensus?" | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ |
| "What happened on node X at time T?" | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ |
| "Show me the TX journey across 5 nodes" | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ |
### 2.6.4 Coexistence Strategy
```mermaid
flowchart TB
subgraph xrpld["xrpld Process"]
perflog["PerfLog<br/>(JSON to file)"]
insight["Beast Insight<br/>(StatsD)"]
otel["OpenTelemetry<br/>(Tracing)"]
end
perflog --> perffile["perf.log"]
insight --> statsd["StatsD Server"]
otel --> collector["OTLP Collector"]
perffile --> grafana["Grafana<br/>(Unified UI)"]
statsd --> grafana
collector --> grafana
style xrpld fill:#212121,stroke:#0a0a0a,color:#ffffff
style grafana fill:#bf360c,stroke:#8c2809,color:#ffffff
```
**Reading the diagram:**
- **xrpld Process (dark gray)**: The single xrpld node running all three observability frameworks side by side. Each framework operates independently with no interference.
- **PerfLog to perf.log**: PerfLog writes JSON-formatted event logs to a local file. Grafana can ingest these via Loki or a file-based datasource.
- **Beast Insight to StatsD Server**: Insight sends aggregated metrics (counters, gauges) over UDP to a StatsD server. Grafana reads from StatsD-compatible backends like Graphite or Prometheus (via StatsD exporter).
- **OpenTelemetry to OTLP Collector**: OTel exports spans over OTLP/HTTP to a Collector, which then forwards to a trace backend (Tempo). (OTLP/gRPC is future work — §2.2.2.)
- **Grafana (red, unified UI)**: All three data streams converge in Grafana, enabling operators to correlate logs, metrics, and traces in a single dashboard.
### 2.6.5 Correlation with PerfLog
Trace IDs can be correlated with existing PerfLog entries for comprehensive
debugging. The design is for `RPCHandler.cpp` to start an `rpc.command.<method>`
span alongside the existing PerfLog `rpcStart`/`rpcFinish`/`rpcError` calls,
extract the span's `trace_id` (when valid), and eventually stamp it onto the
PerfLog entry (a planned `setTraceId` hook) so logs and traces share a key. The
span status is set to OK on success or to error (recording the exception) on
failure.
---
_Previous: [Architecture Analysis](./01-architecture-analysis.md)_ | _Next: [Implementation Strategy](./03-implementation-strategy.md)_ | _Back to: [Overview](./OpenTelemetryPlan.md)_

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,488 @@
# Implementation Strategy
> **Parent Document**: [OpenTelemetryPlan.md](./OpenTelemetryPlan.md)
> **Related**: [Configuration Reference](./05-configuration-reference.md)
---
## 3.1 Directory Structure
The telemetry implementation follows xrpld's existing code organization pattern:
```
include/xrpl/
├── telemetry/
│ ├── Telemetry.h # Main telemetry interface
│ ├── TelemetryConfig.h # Configuration structures
│ ├── TraceContext.h # Context propagation utilities
│ ├── SpanGuard.h # RAII span management
│ └── SpanAttributes.h # Attribute helper functions
src/libxrpl/
├── telemetry/
│ ├── Telemetry.cpp # Implementation
│ ├── TelemetryConfig.cpp # Config parsing
│ ├── TraceContext.cpp # Context serialization
│ └── NullTelemetry.cpp # No-op implementation
src/xrpld/
├── telemetry/
│ ├── TracingInstrumentation.h # Instrumentation macros
│ └── TracingInstrumentation.cpp
```
---
## 3.2 Implementation Approach
<div align="center">
```mermaid
%%{init: {'flowchart': {'nodeSpacing': 20, 'rankSpacing': 30}}}%%
flowchart TB
subgraph phase1["Phase 1: Core"]
direction LR
sdk["SDK Integration"] ~~~ interface["Telemetry Interface"] ~~~ config["Configuration"]
end
subgraph phase2["Phase 2: RPC"]
direction LR
http["HTTP Context"] ~~~ rpc["RPC Handlers"]
end
subgraph phase3["Phase 3: P2P"]
direction LR
proto["Protobuf Context"] ~~~ tx["Transaction Relay"]
end
subgraph phase4["Phase 4: Consensus"]
direction LR
consensus["Consensus Rounds"] ~~~ proposals["Proposals"]
end
phase1 --> phase2 --> phase3 --> phase4
style phase1 fill:#1565c0,stroke:#0d47a1,color:#ffffff
style phase2 fill:#2e7d32,stroke:#1b5e20,color:#ffffff
style phase3 fill:#e65100,stroke:#bf360c,color:#ffffff
style phase4 fill:#c2185b,stroke:#880e4f,color:#ffffff
```
</div>
### Key Principles
1. **Minimal Intrusion**: Instrumentation should not alter existing control flow
2. **Zero-Cost When Disabled**: Use compile-time flags and no-op implementations
3. **Backward Compatibility**: Protocol Buffer extensions use high field numbers
4. **Graceful Degradation**: Tracing failures must not affect node operation
---
## 3.3 Performance Overhead Summary
> **OTLP** = OpenTelemetry Protocol
| Metric | Overhead | Notes |
| ------------- | ---------- | ------------------------------------------------ |
| CPU | 1-3% | Of per-transaction CPU cost (~200μs baseline) |
| Memory | ~10 MB | SDK statics + batch buffer + worker thread stack |
| Network | 10-50 KB/s | Compressed OTLP export to collector |
| Latency (p99) | <2% | With proper sampling configuration |
---
## 3.4 Detailed CPU Overhead Analysis
### 3.4.1 Per-Operation Costs
> **Note on hardware assumptions**: The costs below are based on the official OTel C++ SDK CI benchmarks
> (969 runs on GitHub Actions 2-core shared runners). On production server hardware (3+ GHz Xeon),
> expect costs at the **lower end** of each range (~30-50% improvement over CI hardware).
| Operation | Time (ns) | Frequency | Impact |
| --------------------- | --------- | ---------------------- | ---------- |
| Span creation | 500-1000 | Every traced operation | Low |
| Span end | 100-200 | Every traced operation | Low |
| SetAttribute (string) | 80-120 | 3-5 per span | Low |
| SetAttribute (int) | 40-60 | 2-3 per span | Negligible |
| AddEvent | 100-200 | 0-2 per span | Low |
| Context injection | 150-250 | Per outgoing message | Low |
| Context extraction | 100-180 | Per incoming message | Low |
| GetCurrent context | 10-20 | Thread-local access | Negligible |
**Source**: Span creation based on OTel C++ SDK `BM_SpanCreation` benchmark (AlwaysOnSampler +
SimpleSpanProcessor + InMemoryExporter), median ~1,000 ns on CI hardware. AddEvent includes
timestamp read + string copy + vector push + mutex acquisition. Context injection/extraction
confirmed by `BM_SpanCreationWithScope` benchmark delta (~160 ns).
### 3.4.2 Transaction Processing Overhead
<div align="center">
```mermaid
%%{init: {'pie': {'textPosition': 0.75}}}%%
pie showData
"tx.receive (1400ns)" : 1400
"tx.validate (1200ns)" : 1200
"tx.relay (1200ns)" : 1200
"Context inject (200ns)" : 200
```
**Transaction Tracing Overhead (~4.0μs total)**
</div>
**Overhead percentage**: 4.0 μs / 200 μs (avg tx processing) = **~2.0%**
> **Breakdown**: Each span (tx.receive, tx.validate, tx.relay) costs ~1,000 ns for creation plus
> ~200-400 ns for 3-5 attribute sets. Context injection is ~200 ns (confirmed by benchmarks).
> On production hardware, expect ~2.6 μs total (~1.3% overhead) due to faster span creation (~500-600 ns).
### 3.4.3 Consensus Round Overhead
| Operation | Count | Cost (ns) | Total |
| ---------------------- | ----- | --------- | ---------- |
| consensus.round span | 1 | ~1200 | ~1.2 μs |
| consensus.phase spans | 3 | ~1100 | ~3.3 μs |
| proposal.receive spans | ~20 | ~1100 | ~22 μs |
| proposal.send spans | ~3 | ~1100 | ~3.3 μs |
| Context operations | ~30 | ~200 | ~6 μs |
| **TOTAL** | | | **~36 μs** |
> **Why higher**: Each span costs ~1,000 ns creation + ~100-200 ns for 1-2 attributes, totaling ~1,100-1,200 ns.
> Context operations remain ~200 ns (confirmed by benchmarks). On production hardware, expect ~24 μs total.
**Overhead percentage**: 36 μs / 3s (typical round) = **~0.001%** (negligible)
### 3.4.4 RPC Request Overhead
| Operation | Cost (ns) |
| ---------------- | ------------ |
| rpc.request span | ~1200 |
| rpc.command span | ~1100 |
| Context extract | ~250 |
| Context inject | ~200 |
| **TOTAL** | **~2.75 μs** |
> **Why higher**: Each span costs ~1,000 ns creation + ~100-200 ns for attributes (command name,
> version, role). Context extract/inject costs are confirmed by OTel C++ benchmarks.
- Fast RPC (1ms): 2.75 μs / 1ms = **~0.275%**
- Slow RPC (100ms): 2.75 μs / 100ms = **~0.003%**
---
## 3.5 Memory Overhead Analysis
> **OTLP** = OpenTelemetry Protocol
### 3.5.1 Static Memory
| Component | Size | Allocated |
| ------------------------------------ | ----------- | ---------- |
| TracerProvider singleton | ~64 KB | At startup |
| BatchSpanProcessor (circular buffer) | ~16 KB | At startup |
| BatchSpanProcessor (worker thread) | ~8 MB | At startup |
| OTLP/HTTP exporter (client init) | ~64 KB | At startup |
| Propagator registry | ~8 KB | At startup |
| **Total static** | **~8.1 MB** | |
> **Why higher than earlier estimate**: The BatchSpanProcessor's circular buffer itself is only ~16 KB
> (2049 x 8-byte `AtomicUniquePtr` entries), but it spawns a dedicated worker thread whose default
> stack size on Linux is ~8 MB. The OTLP/HTTP exporter allocates a small client and TLS
> initialization buffer. The worker thread stack dominates the static footprint.
### 3.5.2 Dynamic Memory
| Component | Size per unit | Max units | Peak |
| -------------------- | -------------- | ---------- | --------------- |
| Active span | ~500-800 bytes | 1000 | ~500-800 KB |
| Queued span (export) | ~500 bytes | 2048 | ~1 MB |
| Attribute storage | ~80 bytes | 5 per span | Included |
| Context storage | ~64 bytes | Per thread | ~6.4 KB |
| **Total dynamic** | | | **~1.5-1.8 MB** |
> **Why active spans are larger**: An active `Span` object includes the wrapper (~88 bytes: shared_ptr,
> mutex, unique_ptr to Recordable) plus `SpanData` (~250 bytes: SpanContext, timestamps, name, status,
> empty containers) plus attribute storage (~200-500 bytes for 3-5 string attributes in a `std::map`).
> Source: `sdk/src/trace/span.h` and `sdk/include/opentelemetry/sdk/trace/span_data.h`.
> Queued spans release the wrapper, keeping only `SpanData` + attributes (~500 bytes).
### 3.5.3 Memory Growth Characteristics
```mermaid
---
config:
xyChart:
width: 700
height: 400
---
xychart-beta
title "Memory Usage vs Span Rate (bounded by queue limit)"
x-axis "Spans/second" [0, 200, 400, 600, 800, 1000]
y-axis "Memory (MB)" 0 --> 12
line [8.5, 9.2, 9.6, 9.9, 10.0, 10.0]
```
**Notes**:
- Memory increases with span rate but **plateaus at queue capacity** (default 2048 spans)
- Batch export prevents unbounded growth
- At queue limit, oldest spans are dropped (not blocked)
- Maximum memory is bounded: ~8.3 MB static (dominated by worker thread stack) + 2048 queued spans x ~500 bytes (~1 MB) + active spans (~0.8 MB) ≈ **~10 MB ceiling**
- The worker thread stack (~8 MB) is virtual memory; actual RSS depends on stack usage (typically much less)
> **Measured outcome**: A perf-iac comparison (telemetry compiled-in + enabled vs compiled-out,
> 9 nodes — validators and client-handlers — under sustained payment load) recorded **no measurable
> RSS increase over the telemetry-off baseline** (~15 GiB mean / ~1819 GiB peak on both sides),
> with no OOM, no swap, and no leak across the run. The ~10 MB ceiling above is therefore a
> provisioning safety margin (dominated by virtual thread-stack address space), not an expected
> resident-memory increase. Steady-state cost shows up as throughput (~34% at head sampling 1.0),
> not memory.
### 3.5.4 Performance Data Sources
The overhead estimates in Sections 3.3-3.5 are derived from the following sources:
| Source | What it covers | URL |
| ------------------------------------------------ | ----------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
| OTel C++ SDK CI benchmarks (969 runs) | Span creation, context activation, sampler overhead | [Benchmark Dashboard](https://open-telemetry.github.io/opentelemetry-cpp/benchmarks/) |
| `api/test/trace/span_benchmark.cc` | API-level span creation (~22 ns no-op) | [Source](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-cpp/blob/main/api/test/trace/span_benchmark.cc) |
| `sdk/test/trace/sampler_benchmark.cc` | SDK span creation with samplers (~1,000 ns AlwaysOn) | [Source](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-cpp/blob/main/sdk/test/trace/sampler_benchmark.cc) |
| `sdk/include/.../span_data.h` | SpanData memory layout (~250 bytes base) | [Source](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-cpp/blob/main/sdk/include/opentelemetry/sdk/trace/span_data.h) |
| `sdk/src/trace/span.h` | Span wrapper memory layout (~88 bytes) | [Source](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-cpp/blob/main/sdk/src/trace/span.h) |
| `sdk/include/.../batch_span_processor_options.h` | Default queue size (2048), batch size (512) | [Source](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-cpp/blob/main/sdk/include/opentelemetry/sdk/trace/batch_span_processor_options.h) |
| `sdk/include/.../circular_buffer.h` | CircularBuffer implementation (AtomicUniquePtr array) | [Source](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-cpp/blob/main/sdk/include/opentelemetry/sdk/common/circular_buffer.h) |
| OTLP proto definition | Serialized span size estimation | [Proto](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-proto/blob/main/opentelemetry/proto/trace/v1/trace.proto) |
---
## 3.6 Network Overhead Analysis
### 3.6.1 Export Bandwidth
> **Bytes per span**: Estimates use ~500 bytes/span (conservative upper bound). OTLP protobuf analysis
> shows a typical span with 3-5 string attributes serializes to ~200-300 bytes raw; with gzip
> compression (~60-70% of raw) and batching (amortized headers), ~350 bytes/span is more realistic.
> The table uses the conservative estimate for capacity planning.
| Sampling Rate | Spans/sec | Bandwidth | Notes |
| ------------- | --------- | --------- | ---------------- |
| 100% | ~500 | ~250 KB/s | Development only |
| 10% | ~50 | ~25 KB/s | Staging |
| 1% | ~5 | ~2.5 KB/s | Production |
| Error-only | ~1 | ~0.5 KB/s | Minimal overhead |
### 3.6.2 Trace Context Propagation
| Message Type | Context Size | Messages/sec | Overhead |
| ---------------------- | ------------ | ------------ | ----------- |
| TMTransaction | 25 bytes | ~100 | ~2.5 KB/s |
| TMProposeSet | 25 bytes | ~10 | ~250 B/s |
| TMValidation | 25 bytes | ~50 | ~1.25 KB/s |
| **Total P2P overhead** | | | **~4 KB/s** |
---
## 3.7 Optimization Strategies
### 3.7.1 Sampling Strategies
#### Tail Sampling
```mermaid
flowchart TD
trace["New Trace"]
trace --> errors{"Is Error?"}
errors -->|Yes| sample["SAMPLE"]
errors -->|No| consensus{"Is Consensus?"}
consensus -->|Yes| sample
consensus -->|No| slow{"Is Slow?"}
slow -->|Yes| sample
slow -->|No| prob{"Random < 10%?"}
prob -->|Yes| sample
prob -->|No| drop["DROP"]
style sample fill:#4caf50,stroke:#388e3c,color:#fff
style drop fill:#f44336,stroke:#c62828,color:#fff
```
### 3.7.2 Batch Tuning Recommendations
| Environment | Batch Size | Batch Delay | Max Queue |
| ------------------ | ---------- | ----------- | --------- |
| Low-latency | 128 | 1000ms | 512 |
| High-throughput | 1024 | 10000ms | 8192 |
| Memory-constrained | 256 | 2000ms | 512 |
### 3.7.3 Conditional Instrumentation
Instrumentation is gated on two levels. A compile-time feature flag (`XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY`) reduces the trace macros to no-ops when telemetry is built out, so disabled builds carry zero cost. At runtime, per-component guards (e.g. `shouldTracePeer()`) skip span creation for components whose tracing is turned off, incurring no overhead beyond a single boolean check.
---
## 3.8 Links to Detailed Documentation
- **[Configuration Reference](./05-configuration-reference.md)**: Configuration options and collector setup
- **[Implementation Phases](./06-implementation-phases.md)**: Detailed timeline and milestones
---
## 3.9 Code Intrusiveness Assessment
> **TxQ** = Transaction Queue
This section provides a detailed assessment of how intrusive the OpenTelemetry integration is to the existing xrpld codebase.
### 3.9.1 Files Modified Summary
| Component | Files Modified | Lines Added | Lines Changed | Architectural Impact |
| --------------------- | -------------- | ----------- | ------------- | -------------------- |
| **Core Telemetry** | 11 new files | ~980 | 0 | None (new module) |
| **Application Init** | 2 files | ~30 | ~5 | Minimal |
| **RPC Layer** | 3 files | ~80 | ~20 | Minimal |
| **Transaction Relay** | 4 files | ~120 | ~40 | Low |
| **Consensus** | 3 files | ~100 | ~30 | Low-Medium |
| **Protocol Buffers** | 1 file | ~25 | 0 | Low |
| **CMake/Build** | 3 files | ~50 | ~10 | Minimal |
| **PathFinding** | 2 | ~80 | ~5 | Minimal |
| **TxQ/Fee** | 2 | ~60 | ~5 | Minimal |
| **Validator/Amend** | 3 | ~40 | ~5 | Minimal |
| **Total** | **~34 files** | **~1,670** | **~120** | **Low** |
### 3.9.2 Detailed File Impact
```mermaid
pie title Code Changes by Component
"New Telemetry Module" : 800
"Transaction Relay" : 160
"Consensus" : 130
"RPC Layer" : 100
"PathFinding" : 80
"TxQ/Fee" : 60
"Validator/Amendment" : 40
"Application Init" : 35
"Protocol Buffers" : 25
"Build System" : 60
```
#### New Files (No Impact on Existing Code)
| File | Lines | Purpose |
| ------------------------------------------------ | ----- | ------------------------ |
| `include/xrpl/telemetry/Telemetry.h` | ~160 | Main interface |
| `include/xrpl/telemetry/TelemetryConfig.h` | ~80 | Configuration structures |
| `include/xrpl/telemetry/TraceContext.h` | ~80 | Context propagation |
| `include/xrpl/telemetry/SpanGuard.h` | ~120 | RAII wrapper |
| `include/xrpl/telemetry/SpanAttributes.h` | ~60 | Attribute helpers |
| `src/libxrpl/telemetry/Telemetry.cpp` | ~200 | Implementation |
| `src/libxrpl/telemetry/TelemetryConfig.cpp` | ~60 | Config parsing |
| `src/libxrpl/telemetry/TraceContext.cpp` | ~80 | Context serialization |
| `src/libxrpl/telemetry/NullTelemetry.cpp` | ~40 | No-op implementation |
| `src/xrpld/telemetry/TracingInstrumentation.h` | ~60 | Macros |
| `src/xrpld/telemetry/TracingInstrumentation.cpp` | ~40 | Instrumentation impl |
#### Modified Files (Existing Xrpld Code)
| File | Lines Added | Lines Changed | Risk Level |
| ------------------------------------------------- | ----------- | ------------- | ---------- |
| `src/xrpld/app/main/Application.cpp` | ~15 | ~3 | Low |
| `include/xrpl/core/ServiceRegistry.h` | ~5 | ~2 | Low |
| `src/xrpld/rpc/detail/ServerHandler.cpp` | ~40 | ~10 | Low |
| `src/xrpld/rpc/handlers/*.cpp` | ~30 | ~8 | Low |
| `src/xrpld/overlay/detail/PeerImp.cpp` | ~60 | ~15 | Medium |
| `src/xrpld/overlay/detail/OverlayImpl.cpp` | ~30 | ~10 | Medium |
| `src/xrpld/app/consensus/RCLConsensus.cpp` | ~50 | ~15 | Medium |
| `src/xrpld/app/consensus/RCLConsensusAdaptor.cpp` | ~40 | ~12 | Medium |
| `src/xrpld/core/JobQueue.cpp` | ~20 | ~5 | Low |
| `src/xrpld/app/paths/PathRequest.cpp` | ~40 | ~3 | Low |
| `src/xrpld/app/paths/Pathfinder.cpp` | ~40 | ~2 | Low |
| `src/xrpld/app/misc/TxQ.cpp` | ~40 | ~3 | Low |
| `src/xrpld/app/main/LoadManager.cpp` | ~20 | ~2 | Low |
| `src/xrpld/app/misc/ValidatorList.cpp` | ~20 | ~2 | Low |
| `src/xrpld/app/misc/AmendmentTable.cpp` | ~10 | ~2 | Low |
| `src/xrpld/app/misc/Manifest.cpp` | ~10 | ~1 | Low |
| `src/xrpld/shamap/SHAMap.cpp` | ~20 | ~3 | Low |
| `src/xrpld/overlay/detail/ripple.proto` | ~25 | 0 | Low |
| `CMakeLists.txt` | ~40 | ~8 | Low |
| `cmake/FindOpenTelemetry.cmake` | ~50 | 0 | None (new) |
### 3.9.3 Risk Assessment by Component
<div align="center">
**Do First** ↖ ↗ **Plan Carefully**
```mermaid
quadrantChart
title Code Intrusiveness Risk Matrix
x-axis Low Risk --> High Risk
y-axis Low Value --> High Value
RPC Tracing: [0.2, 0.55]
Transaction Relay: [0.55, 0.85]
Consensus Tracing: [0.75, 0.92]
Peer Message Tracing: [0.85, 0.35]
JobQueue Context: [0.3, 0.42]
Ledger Acquisition: [0.48, 0.65]
PathFinding: [0.38, 0.72]
TxQ and Fees: [0.25, 0.62]
Validator Mgmt: [0.15, 0.35]
```
**Optional** ↙ ↘ **Avoid**
</div>
#### Risk Level Definitions
| Risk Level | Definition | Mitigation |
| ---------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------- |
| **Low** | Additive changes only; no modification to existing logic | Standard code review |
| **Medium** | Minor modifications to existing functions; clear boundaries | Comprehensive unit tests |
| **High** | Changes to core logic or data structures; potential side effects | Integration tests + staged rollout |
### 3.9.4 Architectural Impact Assessment
| Aspect | Impact | Justification |
| -------------------- | ------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| **Data Flow** | Minimal | Read-only instrumentation; no modification to consensus or transaction data flow |
| **Threading Model** | Minimal | Context propagation uses thread-local storage (standard OTel pattern) |
| **Memory Model** | Low | Bounded queues prevent unbounded growth; RAII ensures cleanup |
| **Network Protocol** | Low | Optional fields in protobuf (high field numbers); backward compatible |
| **Configuration** | None | New config section; existing configs unaffected |
| **Build System** | Low | Optional CMake flag; builds work without OpenTelemetry |
| **Dependencies** | Low | OpenTelemetry SDK is optional; null implementation when disabled |
### 3.9.5 Backward Compatibility
| Compatibility | Status | Notes |
| --------------- | ------- | ----------------------------------------------------- |
| **Config File** | ✅ Full | New `[telemetry]` section is optional |
| **Protocol** | ✅ Full | Optional protobuf fields with high field numbers |
| **Build** | ✅ Full | `XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY=OFF` produces identical binary |
| **Runtime** | ✅ Full | `enabled=0` produces zero overhead |
| **API** | ✅ Full | No changes to public RPC or P2P APIs |
### 3.9.6 Rollback Strategy
If issues are discovered after deployment:
1. **Immediate**: Set `enabled=0` in config and restart (zero code change)
2. **Quick**: Rebuild with `XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY=OFF`
3. **Complete**: Revert telemetry commits (clean separation makes this easy)
### 3.9.7 Code Change Examples
**Minimal RPC Instrumentation (Low Intrusiveness):** Instrumenting an RPC handler adds roughly 3-4 lines: one macro to start the span and one or two `setAttribute` calls (command name, status). The span ends automatically via RAII, so the existing control flow — process the request, send the result — is untouched.
**Consensus Instrumentation (Medium Intrusiveness):** Consensus is slightly more intrusive because child spans in later phase transitions need the round's context. Beyond the span-start and attribute macros, this requires storing the active context in a new member variable (`currentRoundContext_`) at round start. The existing round logic itself remains unchanged.
---
_Previous: [Design Decisions](./02-design-decisions.md)_ | _Next: [Configuration Reference](./05-configuration-reference.md)_ | _Back to: [Overview](./OpenTelemetryPlan.md)_

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,265 @@
# Configuration Reference
> **Parent Document**: [OpenTelemetryPlan.md](./OpenTelemetryPlan.md)
> **Related**: [Implementation Phases](./06-implementation-phases.md)
---
## 5.1 xrpld Configuration
> **OTLP** = OpenTelemetry Protocol | **TxQ** = Transaction Queue
### 5.1.1 Configuration File Section
The authoritative `[telemetry]` example lives in `cfg/xrpld-example.cfg`. Telemetry is disabled by default (`enabled=0`); enabling it turns on distributed tracing for transaction flow, consensus, and RPC calls, with traces exported to an OpenTelemetry Collector over OTLP. Head sampling is intentionally fixed at 1.0 (sample everything) and is not configurable — per-node head-sampling would produce broken/partial distributed traces, so volume reduction is delegated to the collector's tail sampling (see Section 7.4.2). The full option reference follows.
### 5.1.2 Configuration Options Summary
| Option | Type | Default | Description |
| --------------------- | ------ | --------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------- |
| `enabled` | bool | `false` | Enable/disable telemetry |
| `endpoint` | string | `http://localhost:4318/v1/traces` | OTLP/HTTP collector endpoint |
| `use_tls` | bool | `false` | Enable TLS for exporter connection |
| `tls_ca_cert` | string | `""` | Path to CA certificate file |
| `batch_size` | uint | `512` | Spans per export batch |
| `batch_delay_ms` | uint | `5000` | Max delay before sending batch (ms) |
| `max_queue_size` | uint | `2048` | Maximum queued spans |
| `trace_transactions` | bool | `true` | Enable transaction tracing |
| `trace_consensus` | bool | `true` | Enable consensus tracing |
| `trace_rpc` | bool | `true` | Enable RPC tracing |
| `trace_peer` | bool | `true` | Enable peer message tracing (high volume) |
| `trace_ledger` | bool | `true` | Enable ledger tracing |
| `service_name` | string | `"xrpld"` | Service name (`service.name`) for traces and metrics |
| `service_instance_id` | string | `<node_pubkey>` | Instance identifier |
**Planned (not yet implemented)**: the following options appear in the design
documents but are not parsed by `TelemetryConfig.cpp` in Phase 1b and later
phases. They will be added as the corresponding subsystems are instrumented:
| Option | Planned Phase | Purpose |
| -------------------------- | ------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| `exporter` | Future | Select between OTLP/HTTP and OTLP/gRPC |
| `trace_pathfind` | Phase 2 | Path computation tracing toggle |
| `trace_txq` | Phase 3 | Transaction queue tracing toggle |
| `trace_validator` | Future | Validator list / manifest update tracing |
| `trace_amendment` | Future | Amendment voting tracing |
| `consensus_trace_strategy` | Phase 4 | Trace ID strategy for consensus rounds (`deterministic` \| `attribute`) |
---
## 5.2 Configuration Parser
> **TxQ** = Transaction Queue
The parser `setup_Telemetry()` in `src/libxrpl/telemetry/TelemetryConfig.cpp` reads the `[telemetry]` `Section` and populates a `Telemetry::Setup` struct, applying the defaults listed in Section 5.1.2 via `section.value_or(...)`. It derives `serviceInstanceId` from the node public key when not overridden, selects the exporter endpoint default by exporter type, and leaves the sampling ratio at its fixed 1.0 default (not read from config — see Section 7.4.2).
---
## 5.3 Application Integration
### 5.3.1 ApplicationImp Changes
> **Deferred identity**: The node public key (`nodeIdentity_`) is not
> available during `ApplicationImp`'s member initializer list — it is
> resolved later in `setup()`. The `Telemetry` object is therefore
> constructed with an empty `serviceInstanceId` and patched via
> `setServiceInstanceId()` once `setup()` has called `getNodeIdentity()`.
`ApplicationImp` (in `src/xrpld/app/main/Application.cpp`) owns a `std::unique_ptr<telemetry::Telemetry> telemetry_`. It is built in the member initializer list via `make_Telemetry(setup_Telemetry(...))` with an empty `serviceInstanceId`, then patched in `setup()` by calling `setServiceInstanceId()` with the Base58 node public key (unless the user supplied a custom `service_instance_id`). `start()` and `run()` forward to `telemetry_->start()` / `telemetry_->stop()`, and `getTelemetry()` returns the owned instance.
### 5.3.2 ServiceRegistry Interface Addition
`include/xrpl/core/ServiceRegistry.h` gains a pure-virtual `telemetry::Telemetry& getTelemetry()` (with a forward declaration of `telemetry::Telemetry`), giving every component a uniform accessor for the tracing subsystem.
> **Note:** `Application` extends `ServiceRegistry`, so `getTelemetry()` is
> available on both. Components that hold a `ServiceRegistry&` (e.g.
> `NetworkOPsImp`) call `registry_.get().getTelemetry()`. Components that
> still hold an `Application&` (e.g. `ServerHandler`, `PeerImp`,
> `RCLConsensusAdaptor`) call `app_.getTelemetry()` directly.
---
## 5.4 CMake Integration
> **OTLP** = OpenTelemetry Protocol
### 5.4.1 Find OpenTelemetry Module
A `cmake/FindOpenTelemetry.cmake` module locates the OpenTelemetry C++ SDK. It first tries `find_package(opentelemetry-cpp CONFIG)`, aliasing the imported targets `OpenTelemetry::api`, `OpenTelemetry::sdk`, and `OpenTelemetry::otlp_grpc_exporter`, and falls back to `pkg-config` when no CMake config package is present.
### 5.4.2 CMakeLists.txt Changes
The top-level `CMakeLists.txt` adds an `XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY` option (default `OFF`). When enabled, it runs `find_package(OpenTelemetry REQUIRED)`, defines the `XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY` compile flag, and builds the `xrpl_telemetry` library from the real telemetry sources linked against the OpenTelemetry targets; when disabled, it builds the same target from a no-op `NullTelemetry.cpp` so call sites compile unchanged.
---
## 5.5 OpenTelemetry Collector Configuration
> **OTLP** = OpenTelemetry Protocol | **APM** = Application Performance Monitoring
The authoritative collector config lives in the repo at `docker/telemetry/otel-collector-config.yaml` (with Tempo backend config in `docker/telemetry/tempo.yaml`). The sections below summarize the development and production shapes of that pipeline.
### 5.5.1 Development Configuration
The development collector enables an OTLP receiver on both gRPC (`0.0.0.0:4317`) and HTTP (`0.0.0.0:4318`), a single `batch` processor (1s timeout, batch size 100), and two exporters: a `logging` exporter for console debugging and `otlp/tempo` (insecure) for trace visualization. The single `traces` pipeline wires receiver → batch → both exporters.
### 5.5.2 Production Configuration
The production collector adds TLS on the OTLP gRPC receiver and a richer processor chain: a `memory_limiter` (OOM guard), `batch` (5s timeout, size 512), `tail_sampling`, and an `attributes` processor that hashes sensitive fields (e.g. `tx_account`) and stamps `deployment.environment`. Tail sampling keeps all `ERROR` traces, slow consensus rounds (>5s) and slow RPC requests (>1s), and probabilistically samples the remainder at 10%. Exporters target Grafana Tempo (TLS) and Elastic APM; `health_check` and `zpages` extensions are enabled for operability.
---
## 5.6 Docker Compose Development Environment
> **OTLP** = OpenTelemetry Protocol
The authoritative development stack lives in the repo at `docker/telemetry/docker-compose.yml`. It brings up four services on a shared `xrpld-telemetry` network: an `otel-collector` (otel/opentelemetry-collector-contrib) exposing OTLP gRPC `4317`, OTLP HTTP `4318`, and health check `13133`; `tempo` for trace storage/visualization; `grafana` with provisioned datasources and dashboards (anonymous admin enabled); and an optional `prometheus` for metric correlation.
---
## 5.7 Configuration Architecture
> **OTLP** = OpenTelemetry Protocol
```mermaid
flowchart TB
subgraph config["Configuration Sources"]
cfgFile["xrpld.cfg<br/>[telemetry] section"]
cmake["CMake<br/>XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY"]
end
subgraph init["Initialization"]
parse["setup_Telemetry()"]
factory["make_Telemetry()"]
end
subgraph runtime["Runtime Components"]
tracer["TracerProvider"]
exporter["OTLP Exporter"]
processor["BatchProcessor"]
end
subgraph collector["Collector Pipeline"]
recv["Receivers"]
proc["Processors"]
exp["Exporters"]
end
cfgFile --> parse
cmake -->|"compile flag"| parse
parse --> factory
factory --> tracer
tracer --> processor
processor --> exporter
exporter -->|"OTLP"| recv
recv --> proc
proc --> exp
style config fill:#e3f2fd,stroke:#1976d2
style runtime fill:#e8f5e9,stroke:#388e3c
style collector fill:#fff3e0,stroke:#ff9800
```
**Reading the diagram:**
- **Configuration Sources**: `xrpld.cfg` provides runtime settings (endpoint, per-component trace toggles) while the CMake flag controls whether telemetry is compiled in at all. Head sampling is fixed at 1.0 and is not a config option; volume reduction happens via tail sampling in the collector.
- **Initialization**: `setup_Telemetry()` parses config values, then `make_Telemetry()` constructs the provider, processor, and exporter objects.
- **Runtime Components**: The `TracerProvider` creates spans, the `BatchProcessor` buffers them, and the `OTLP Exporter` serializes and sends them over the wire.
- **OTLP arrow to Collector**: Trace data leaves the xrpld process via OTLP/HTTP and enters the external Collector pipeline. (OTLP/gRPC is future work — see design decisions §2.2.2.)
- **Collector Pipeline**: `Receivers` ingest OTLP data, `Processors` apply sampling/filtering/enrichment, and `Exporters` forward traces to storage backends (Tempo, etc.).
---
## 5.8 Grafana Integration
> **APM** = Application Performance Monitoring
Step-by-step instructions for integrating xrpld traces with Grafana.
### 5.8.1 Data Source Configuration
#### Tempo (Recommended)
A Tempo datasource (`grafana/provisioning/datasources/tempo.yaml`, provisioned from `docker/telemetry/grafana/`) points at `http://tempo:3200` and enables `tracesToLogs` (linking to Loki on `service.name`/`tx_hash` and mapping `trace_id``traceID`), `serviceMap` against Prometheus, the node graph, and Loki search.
#### Elastic APM
Alternatively, an Elasticsearch datasource (`grafana/provisioning/datasources/elastic-apm.yaml`) of type `elasticsearch` points at `http://elasticsearch:9200` against the `apm-*` index, using `@timestamp` as the time field and mapping the log message/level fields.
### 5.8.2 Dashboard Provisioning
A dashboard provider (`grafana/provisioning/dashboards/dashboards.yaml`) loads the `xrpld` dashboard folder from disk (`/var/lib/grafana/dashboards/rippled`), polling for changes every 30s with deletion disabled.
### 5.8.3 Example Dashboard: RPC Performance
An example `xrpld RPC Performance` dashboard (uid `xrpld-rpc-performance`) sourced from Tempo via TraceQL provides four panels: RPC latency by command (heatmap), RPC error rate by command (timeseries), the top 10 slowest RPC commands by average duration (table), and a recent-traces table.
### 5.8.4 Example Dashboard: Transaction Tracing
An example `xrpld Transaction Tracing` dashboard (uid `xrpld-tx-tracing`) over Tempo provides three panels: transaction throughput (`tx.receive` rate, stat), cross-node relay count (average `span.relay_count` on `tx.relay`, timeseries), and a table of transaction validation errors (`tx.validate` with `status.code=error`).
### 5.8.5 TraceQL Query Examples
Common queries for xrpld traces:
```
# Find all traces for a specific transaction hash
{resource.service.name="xrpld" && span.tx_hash="ABC123..."}
# Find slow RPC commands (>100ms)
{resource.service.name="xrpld" && name=~"rpc.command.*"} | duration > 100ms
# Find consensus rounds taking >5 seconds
{resource.service.name="xrpld" && name="consensus.round"} | duration > 5s
# Find failed transactions with error details
{resource.service.name="xrpld" && name="tx.validate" && status.code=error}
# Find transactions relayed to many peers
{resource.service.name="xrpld" && name="tx.relay"} | span.relay_count > 10
# Compare latency across nodes
{resource.service.name="xrpld" && name="rpc.command.account_info"} | avg(duration) by (resource.service.instance.id)
```
### 5.8.6 Correlation with PerfLog
To correlate OpenTelemetry traces with existing PerfLog data:
**Step 1: Configure Loki to ingest PerfLog**
Configure a Promtail scrape job (`promtail-config.yaml`) that tails `/var/log/rippled/perf*.log`, parses each JSON line, and promotes `trace_id`, `ledger_seq`, and `tx_hash` to Loki labels.
**Step 2: Add trace_id to PerfLog entries**
Modify PerfLog so its JSON output includes a `trace_id` field whenever a valid span is active: fetch the current span from the OpenTelemetry runtime context, and if its context is valid, render the trace ID as a 32-character lowercase hex string into the log entry.
**Step 3: Configure Grafana trace-to-logs link**
In the Tempo datasource, set the `tracesToLogs` derived field to link to Loki on the `trace_id` and `tx_hash` tags, with `filterByTraceID: true`.
### 5.8.7 Correlation with Insight/StatsD Metrics
To correlate traces with existing Beast Insight metrics:
**Step 1: Export Insight metrics to Prometheus**
Add a Prometheus scrape job (`prometheus.yaml`) named `xrpld-statsd` targeting the StatsD exporter at `statsd-exporter:9102`.
**Step 2: Add exemplars to metrics**
The OpenTelemetry SDK automatically adds exemplars (trace IDs) to metrics when using the Prometheus exporter, linking metric spikes to specific traces.
**Step 3: Configure Grafana metric-to-trace link**
In the Prometheus datasource, set `exemplarTraceIdDestinations` to map the `trace_id` exemplar to the Tempo datasource.
**Step 4: Dashboard panel with exemplars**
Add a timeseries panel over Prometheus (e.g. `histogram_quantile(0.99, rate(xrpld_rpc_duration_seconds_bucket[5m]))`) with `exemplar: true` enabled.
This allows clicking on metric data points to jump directly to the related trace.
---
_Previous: [Implementation Strategy](./03-implementation-strategy.md)_ | _Next: [Implementation Phases](./06-implementation-phases.md)_ | _Back to: [Overview](./OpenTelemetryPlan.md)_

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,575 @@
# Implementation Phases
> **Parent Document**: [OpenTelemetryPlan.md](./OpenTelemetryPlan.md)
> **Related**: [Configuration Reference](./05-configuration-reference.md) | [Observability Backends](./07-observability-backends.md)
---
## 6.1 Phase Overview
> **TxQ** = Transaction Queue
```mermaid
gantt
title OpenTelemetry Implementation Timeline
dateFormat YYYY-MM-DD
axisFormat Week %W
section Phase 1
Core Infrastructure :p1, 2024-01-01, 2w
SDK Integration :p1a, 2024-01-01, 4d
Telemetry Interface :p1b, after p1a, 3d
Configuration & CMake :p1c, after p1b, 3d
Unit Tests :p1d, after p1c, 2d
Buffer & Integration :p1e, after p1d, 2d
section Phase 2
RPC Tracing :p2, after p1, 2w
HTTP Context Extraction :p2a, after p1, 2d
RPC Handler Instrumentation :p2b, after p2a, 4d
PathFinding Instrumentation :p2f, after p2b, 2d
TxQ Instrumentation :p2g, after p2f, 2d
WebSocket Support :p2c, after p2g, 2d
Integration Tests :p2d, after p2c, 2d
Buffer & Review :p2e, after p2d, 4d
section Phase 3
Transaction Tracing :p3, after p2, 2w
Protocol Buffer Extension :p3a, after p2, 2d
PeerImp Instrumentation :p3b, after p3a, 3d
Fee Escalation Instrumentation :p3f, after p3b, 2d
Relay Context Propagation :p3c, after p3f, 3d
Multi-node Tests :p3d, after p3c, 2d
Buffer & Review :p3e, after p3d, 4d
section Phase 4
Consensus Tracing :p4, after p3, 2w
Consensus Round Spans :p4a, after p3, 3d
Proposal Handling :p4b, after p4a, 3d
Validator List & Manifest Tracing :p4f, after p4b, 2d
Amendment Voting Tracing :p4g, after p4f, 2d
SHAMap Sync Tracing :p4h, after p4g, 2d
Validation Tests :p4c, after p4h, 4d
Buffer & Review :p4e, after p4c, 4d
section Phase 5
Documentation & Deploy :p5, after p4, 1w
```
---
## 6.2 Phase 1: Core Infrastructure (Weeks 1-2)
**Objective**: Establish foundational telemetry infrastructure
### Tasks
| Task | Description |
| ---- | ----------------------------------------------------- |
| 1.1 | Add OpenTelemetry C++ SDK to Conan/CMake |
| 1.2 | Implement `Telemetry` interface and factory |
| 1.3 | Implement `SpanGuard` RAII wrapper |
| 1.4 | Implement configuration parser |
| 1.5 | Integrate into `ApplicationImp` |
| 1.6 | Add conditional compilation (`XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY`) |
| 1.7 | Create `NullTelemetry` no-op implementation |
| 1.8 | Unit tests for core infrastructure |
### Exit Criteria
- [ ] OpenTelemetry SDK compiles and links
- [ ] Telemetry can be enabled/disabled via config
- [ ] Basic span creation works
- [ ] No performance regression when disabled
- [ ] Unit tests passing
---
## 6.3 Phase 2: RPC Tracing (Weeks 3-4)
> **TxQ** = Transaction Queue
**Objective**: Complete tracing for all RPC operations
### Tasks
| Task | Description |
| ---- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 2.1 | Implement W3C Trace Context HTTP header extraction |
| 2.2 | Instrument `ServerHandler::onRequest()` |
| 2.3 | Instrument `RPCHandler::doCommand()` |
| 2.4 | Add RPC-specific attributes |
| 2.5 | Instrument WebSocket handler |
| 2.6 | PathFinding instrumentation (`pathfind.request`, `pathfind.compute` spans) |
| 2.7 | TxQ instrumentation (`txq.enqueue`, `txq.apply` spans) |
| 2.8 | Integration tests for RPC tracing |
| 2.9 | Performance benchmarks |
| 2.10 | Documentation |
### Exit Criteria
- [ ] All RPC commands traced
- [ ] Trace context propagates from HTTP headers
- [ ] WebSocket and HTTP both instrumented
- [ ] <1ms overhead per RPC call
- [ ] Integration tests passing
---
## 6.4 Phase 3: Transaction Tracing (Weeks 5-6)
**Objective**: Trace transaction lifecycle across network
### Tasks
| Task | Description |
| ---- | ---------------------------------------------------- |
| 3.1 | Define `TraceContext` Protocol Buffer message |
| 3.2 | Implement protobuf context serialization |
| 3.3 | Instrument `PeerImp::handleTransaction()` |
| 3.4 | Instrument `NetworkOPs::submitTransaction()` |
| 3.5 | Instrument HashRouter integration |
| 3.6 | Fee escalation instrumentation (`fee.escalate` span) |
| 3.7 | Implement relay context propagation |
| 3.8 | Integration tests (multi-node) |
| 3.9 | Performance benchmarks |
### Exit Criteria
- [ ] Transaction traces span across nodes
- [ ] Trace context in Protocol Buffer messages
- [ ] HashRouter deduplication visible in traces
- [ ] Multi-node integration tests passing
- [ ] <5% overhead on transaction throughput
---
## 6.5 Phase 4: Consensus Tracing (Weeks 7-8)
**Objective**: Full observability into consensus rounds
### Tasks
| Task | Description |
| ---- | ---------------------------------------------- |
| 4.1 | Instrument `RCLConsensusAdaptor::startRound()` |
| 4.2 | Instrument phase transitions |
| 4.3 | Instrument proposal handling |
| 4.4 | Instrument validation handling |
| 4.5 | Add consensus-specific attributes |
| 4.6 | Correlate with transaction traces |
| 4.7 | Validator list and manifest tracing |
| 4.8 | Amendment voting tracing |
| 4.9 | SHAMap sync tracing |
| 4.10 | Multi-validator integration tests |
| 4.11 | Performance validation |
### Exit Criteria
- [ ] Complete consensus round traces
- [ ] Phase transitions visible
- [ ] Proposals and validations traced
- [ ] No impact on consensus timing
- [ ] Multi-validator test network validated
### Implementation Status — Phase 4a Plan
Phase 4a (establish-phase gap fill & cross-node correlation) will add:
- **Deterministic trace ID** derived from `previousLedger.id()` so all validators
in the same round share the same `trace_id` (switchable via
`consensus_trace_strategy` config: `"deterministic"` or `"attribute"`).
See [Configuration Reference](./05-configuration-reference.md) for full
configuration options.
- **Round lifecycle spans**: `consensus.round` with round-to-round span links.
- **Establish phase**: `consensus.establish`, `consensus.update_positions` (with
`dispute.resolve` events), `consensus.check` (with threshold tracking).
- **Mode changes**: `consensus.mode_change` spans.
- **Validation**: `consensus.validation.send` with span link to round span
(thread-safe cross-thread access via `roundSpanContext_` snapshot).
- **Separation of concerns**: telemetry extracted to private helpers
(`startRoundTracing`, `createValidationSpan`, `startEstablishTracing`,
`updateEstablishTracing`, `endEstablishTracing`).
The `Phase4_taskList.md` spec document is introduced in the Phase 2 PR (#6424)
and will contain the full task breakdown and implementation notes.
---
## 6.6 Phase 5: Documentation & Deployment (Week 9)
**Objective**: Production readiness
### Tasks
| Task | Description |
| ---- | ----------------------------- |
| 5.1 | Operator runbook |
| 5.2 | Grafana dashboards |
| 5.3 | Alert definitions |
| 5.4 | Collector deployment examples |
| 5.5 | Developer documentation |
| 5.6 | Training materials |
| 5.7 | Final integration testing |
---
## 6.7 Risk Assessment
```mermaid
quadrantChart
title Risk Assessment Matrix
x-axis Low Impact --> High Impact
y-axis Low Likelihood --> High Likelihood
quadrant-1 Mitigate Immediately
quadrant-2 Plan Mitigation
quadrant-3 Accept Risk
quadrant-4 Monitor Closely
SDK Compat: [0.2, 0.18]
Protocol Chg: [0.75, 0.72]
Perf Overhead: [0.58, 0.42]
Context Prop: [0.4, 0.55]
Memory Leaks: [0.85, 0.25]
```
### Risk Details
| Risk | Likelihood | Impact | Mitigation |
| ------------------------------------ | ---------- | ------ | --------------------------------------- |
| Protocol changes break compatibility | Medium | High | Use high field numbers, optional fields |
| Performance overhead unacceptable | Medium | Medium | Sampling, conditional compilation |
| Context propagation complexity | Medium | Medium | Phased rollout, extensive testing |
| SDK compatibility issues | Low | Medium | Pin SDK version, fallback to no-op |
| Memory leaks in long-running nodes | Low | High | Memory profiling, bounded queues |
---
## 6.8 Success Metrics
| Metric | Target | Measurement |
| ------------------------ | -------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------- |
| Trace coverage | >95% of transaction code paths (independent of sampling ratio) | Sampling verification |
| CPU overhead | <3% | Benchmark tests |
| Memory overhead | <10 MB | Memory profiling |
| Latency impact (p99) | <2% | Performance tests |
| Trace completeness | >99% spans with required attrs | Validation script |
| Cross-node trace linkage | >90% of multi-hop transactions | Integration tests |
---
## 6.9 Quick Wins and Crawl-Walk-Run Strategy
> **TxQ** = Transaction Queue
This section outlines a prioritized approach to maximize ROI with minimal initial investment.
### 6.9.1 Crawl-Walk-Run Overview
<div align="center">
```mermaid
flowchart TB
subgraph crawl["🐢 CRAWL (Week 1-2)"]
direction LR
c1[Core SDK Setup] ~~~ c2[RPC Tracing Only] ~~~ c3[PathFinding + TxQ Tracing] ~~~ c4[Single Node]
end
subgraph walk["🚶 WALK (Week 3-5)"]
direction LR
w1[Transaction Tracing] ~~~ w2[Fee Escalation Tracing] ~~~ w3[Cross-Node Context] ~~~ w4[Basic Dashboards]
end
subgraph run["🏃 RUN (Week 6-9)"]
direction LR
r1[Consensus Tracing] ~~~ r2[Validator, Amendment,<br/>SHAMap Tracing] ~~~ r3[Full Correlation] ~~~ r4[Production Deploy]
end
crawl --> walk --> run
style crawl fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#fff
style walk fill:#bf360c,stroke:#8c2809,color:#fff
style run fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#fff
style c1 fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#fff
style c2 fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#fff
style c3 fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#fff
style c4 fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#fff
style w1 fill:#ffe0b2,stroke:#ffcc80,color:#1e293b
style w2 fill:#ffe0b2,stroke:#ffcc80,color:#1e293b
style w3 fill:#ffe0b2,stroke:#ffcc80,color:#1e293b
style w4 fill:#ffe0b2,stroke:#ffcc80,color:#1e293b
style r1 fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#fff
style r2 fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#fff
style r3 fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#fff
style r4 fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#fff
```
</div>
**Reading the diagram:**
- **CRAWL (Weeks 1-2)**: Minimal investment -- set up the SDK, instrument RPC and PathFinding/TxQ handlers, and verify on a single node. Delivers immediate latency visibility.
- **WALK (Weeks 3-5)**: Expand to transaction lifecycle tracing, fee escalation, cross-node context propagation, and basic Grafana dashboards. This is where distributed tracing starts working.
- **RUN (Weeks 6-9)**: Full consensus instrumentation, validator/amendment/SHAMap tracing, end-to-end correlation, and production deployment with sampling and alerting.
- **Arrows (crawl → walk → run)**: Each phase builds on the prior one; you cannot skip ahead because later phases depend on infrastructure established earlier.
### 6.9.2 Quick Wins (Immediate Value)
| Quick Win | Value | When to Deploy |
| ------------------------------ | ------ | -------------- |
| **RPC Command Tracing** | High | Week 2 |
| **RPC Latency Histograms** | High | Week 2 |
| **Error Rate Dashboard** | Medium | Week 2 |
| **Transaction Submit Tracing** | High | Week 3 |
| **Consensus Round Duration** | Medium | Week 6 |
### 6.9.3 CRAWL Phase (Weeks 1-2)
**Goal**: Get basic tracing working with minimal code changes.
**What You Get**:
- RPC request/response traces for all commands
- Latency breakdown per RPC command
- PathFinding and TxQ tracing (directly impacts RPC latency)
- Error visibility with stack traces
- Basic Grafana dashboard
**Code Changes**: ~15 lines in `ServerHandler.cpp`, ~40 lines in new telemetry module
**Why Start Here**:
- RPC is the lowest-risk, highest-visibility component
- PathFinding and TxQ are RPC-adjacent and directly affect latency
- Immediate value for debugging client issues
- No cross-node complexity
- Single file modification to existing code
### 6.9.4 WALK Phase (Weeks 3-5)
**Goal**: Add transaction lifecycle tracing across nodes.
**What You Get**:
- End-to-end transaction traces from submit to relay
- Fee escalation tracing within the transaction pipeline
- Cross-node correlation (see transaction path)
- HashRouter deduplication visibility
- Relay latency metrics
**Code Changes**: ~120 lines across 4 files, plus protobuf extension
**Why Do This Second**:
- Builds on RPC tracing (transactions submitted via RPC)
- Fee escalation is integral to the transaction processing pipeline
- Moderate complexity (requires context propagation)
- High value for debugging transaction issues
### 6.9.5 RUN Phase (Weeks 6-9)
**Goal**: Full observability including consensus.
**What You Get**:
- Complete consensus round visibility
- Phase transition timing
- Validator proposal tracking
- Validator list and manifest tracing
- Amendment voting tracing
- SHAMap sync tracing
- Full end-to-end traces (client → RPC → TX → consensus → ledger)
**Code Changes**: ~100 lines across 3 consensus files, plus validator/amendment/SHAMap modules
**Why Do This Last**:
- Highest complexity (consensus is critical path)
- Validator, amendment, and SHAMap components are lower priority
- Requires thorough testing
- Lower relative value (consensus issues are rarer)
### 6.9.6 ROI Prioritization Matrix
```mermaid
quadrantChart
title Implementation ROI Matrix
x-axis Low Effort --> High Effort
y-axis Low Value --> High Value
quadrant-1 Quick Wins - Do First
quadrant-2 Major Projects - Plan Carefully
quadrant-3 Nice to Have - Optional
quadrant-4 Time Sinks - Avoid
RPC Tracing: [0.15, 0.92]
TX Submit Trace: [0.3, 0.78]
TX Relay Trace: [0.5, 0.88]
Consensus Trace: [0.72, 0.72]
Peer Msg Trace: [0.85, 0.3]
Ledger Acquire: [0.55, 0.52]
```
---
## 6.10 Definition of Done
> **TxQ** = Transaction Queue | **HA** = High Availability
Clear, measurable criteria for each phase.
### 6.10.1 Phase 1: Core Infrastructure
| Criterion | Measurement | Target |
| --------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------- |
| SDK Integration | `cmake --build` succeeds with `-DXRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY=ON` | ✅ Compiles |
| Runtime Toggle | `enabled=0` produces zero overhead | <0.1% CPU difference |
| Span Creation | Unit test creates and exports span | Span appears in Tempo |
| Configuration | All config options parsed correctly | Config validation tests pass |
| Documentation | Developer guide exists | PR approved |
**Definition of Done**: All criteria met, PR merged, no regressions in CI.
### 6.10.2 Phase 2: RPC Tracing
| Criterion | Measurement | Target |
| ------------------ | ---------------------------------- | -------------------------- |
| Coverage | All RPC commands instrumented | 100% of commands |
| Context Extraction | traceparent header propagates | Integration test passes |
| Attributes | Command, status, duration recorded | Validation script confirms |
| Performance | RPC latency overhead | <1ms p99 |
| Dashboard | Grafana dashboard deployed | Screenshot in docs |
**Definition of Done**: RPC traces visible in Tempo for all commands, dashboard shows latency distribution.
### 6.10.3 Phase 3: Transaction Tracing
| Criterion | Measurement | Target |
| ---------------- | ------------------------------- | ---------------------------------- |
| Local Trace | Submit validate TxQ traced | Single-node test passes |
| Cross-Node | Context propagates via protobuf | Multi-node test passes |
| Relay Visibility | relay_count attribute correct | Spot check 100 txs |
| HashRouter | Deduplication visible in trace | Duplicate txs show suppressed=true |
| Performance | TX throughput overhead | <5% degradation |
**Definition of Done**: Transaction traces span 3+ nodes in test network, performance within bounds.
### 6.10.4 Phase 4: Consensus Tracing
| Criterion | Measurement | Target |
| -------------------- | ----------------------------- | ------------------------- |
| Round Tracing | startRound creates root span | Unit test passes |
| Phase Visibility | All phases have child spans | Integration test confirms |
| Proposer Attribution | Proposer ID in attributes | Spot check 50 rounds |
| Timing Accuracy | Phase durations match PerfLog | <5% variance |
| No Consensus Impact | Round timing unchanged | Performance test passes |
**Definition of Done**: Consensus rounds fully traceable, no impact on consensus timing.
### 6.10.5 Phase 5: Production Deployment
| Criterion | Measurement | Target |
| ------------ | ---------------------------- | -------------------------- |
| Collector HA | Multiple collectors deployed | No single point of failure |
| Sampling | Tail sampling configured | 10% base + errors + slow |
| Retention | Data retained per policy | 7 days hot, 30 days warm |
| Alerting | Alerts configured | Error spike, high latency |
| Runbook | Operator documentation | Approved by ops team |
| Training | Team trained | Session completed |
**Definition of Done**: Telemetry running in production, operators trained, alerts active.
### 6.10.6 Success Metrics Summary
| Phase | Primary Metric | Secondary Metric | Deadline |
| ------- | ---------------------- | --------------------------- | ------------- |
| Phase 1 | SDK compiles and runs | Zero overhead when disabled | End of Week 2 |
| Phase 2 | 100% RPC coverage | <1ms latency overhead | End of Week 4 |
| Phase 3 | Cross-node traces work | <5% throughput impact | End of Week 6 |
| Phase 4 | Consensus fully traced | No consensus timing impact | End of Week 8 |
| Phase 5 | Production deployment | Operators trained | End of Week 9 |
---
## 6.11 Recommended Implementation Order
Based on ROI analysis, implement in this exact order:
```mermaid
flowchart TB
subgraph week1["Week 1"]
t1[1. OpenTelemetry SDK<br/>Conan/CMake integration]
t2[2. Telemetry interface<br/>SpanGuard, config]
end
subgraph week2["Week 2"]
t3[3. RPC ServerHandler<br/>instrumentation]
t4[4. Basic Tempo setup<br/>for testing]
end
subgraph week3["Week 3"]
t5[5. Transaction submit<br/>tracing]
t6[6. Grafana dashboard<br/>v1]
end
subgraph week4["Week 4"]
t7[7. Protobuf context<br/>extension]
t8[8. PeerImp tx.relay<br/>instrumentation]
end
subgraph week5["Week 5"]
t9[9. Multi-node<br/>integration tests]
t10[10. Performance<br/>benchmarks]
end
subgraph week6_8["Weeks 6-8"]
t11[11. Consensus<br/>instrumentation]
t12[12. Full integration<br/>testing]
end
subgraph week9["Week 9"]
t13[13. Production<br/>deployment]
t14[14. Documentation<br/>& training]
end
t1 --> t2 --> t3 --> t4
t4 --> t5 --> t6
t6 --> t7 --> t8
t8 --> t9 --> t10
t10 --> t11 --> t12
t12 --> t13 --> t14
style week1 fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#fff
style week2 fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#fff
style week3 fill:#bf360c,stroke:#8c2809,color:#fff
style week4 fill:#bf360c,stroke:#8c2809,color:#fff
style week5 fill:#bf360c,stroke:#8c2809,color:#fff
style week6_8 fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#fff
style week9 fill:#4a148c,stroke:#2e0d57,color:#fff
style t1 fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#fff
style t2 fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#fff
style t3 fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#fff
style t4 fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#fff
style t5 fill:#ffe0b2,stroke:#ffcc80,color:#1e293b
style t6 fill:#ffe0b2,stroke:#ffcc80,color:#1e293b
style t7 fill:#ffe0b2,stroke:#ffcc80,color:#1e293b
style t8 fill:#ffe0b2,stroke:#ffcc80,color:#1e293b
style t9 fill:#ffe0b2,stroke:#ffcc80,color:#1e293b
style t10 fill:#ffe0b2,stroke:#ffcc80,color:#1e293b
style t11 fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#fff
style t12 fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#fff
style t13 fill:#4a148c,stroke:#2e0d57,color:#fff
style t14 fill:#4a148c,stroke:#2e0d57,color:#fff
```
**Reading the diagram:**
- **Week 1 (tasks 1-2)**: Foundation work -- integrate the OpenTelemetry SDK via Conan/CMake and build the `Telemetry` interface with `SpanGuard` and config parsing.
- **Week 2 (tasks 3-4)**: First observable output -- instrument `ServerHandler` for RPC tracing and stand up Tempo so developers can see traces immediately.
- **Weeks 3-5 (tasks 5-10)**: Transaction lifecycle -- add submit tracing, build the first Grafana dashboard, extend protobuf for cross-node context, instrument `PeerImp` relay, then validate with multi-node integration tests and performance benchmarks.
- **Weeks 6-8 (tasks 11-12)**: Consensus deep-dive -- instrument consensus rounds and phases, then run full integration testing across all instrumented paths.
- **Week 9 (tasks 13-14)**: Go-live -- deploy to production with sampling/alerting configured, and deliver documentation and operator training.
- **Arrow chain (t1 ... t14)**: Strict sequential dependency; each task's output is a prerequisite for the next.
---
_Previous: [Configuration Reference](./05-configuration-reference.md)_ | _Next: [Observability Backends](./07-observability-backends.md)_ | _Back to: [Overview](./OpenTelemetryPlan.md)_

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,407 @@
# Observability Backend Recommendations
> **Parent Document**: [OpenTelemetryPlan.md](./OpenTelemetryPlan.md)
> **Related**: [Implementation Phases](./06-implementation-phases.md) | [Appendix](./08-appendix.md)
---
## 7.1 Development/Testing Backends
> **OTLP** = OpenTelemetry Protocol
| Backend | Pros | Cons | Use Case |
| ---------- | ----------------------------------- | ---------------------- | ------------------- |
| **Tempo** | Cost-effective, Grafana integration | Requires Grafana stack | Local dev, CI, Prod |
| **Zipkin** | Simple, lightweight | Basic features | Quick prototyping |
### Quick Start with Tempo
```bash
# Start Tempo with OTLP support
docker run -d --name tempo \
-p 3200:3200 \
-p 4317:4317 \
-p 4318:4318 \
grafana/tempo:2.6.1
```
---
## 7.2 Production Backends
> **APM** = Application Performance Monitoring
| Backend | Pros | Cons | Use Case |
| ----------------- | ----------------------------------------- | ---------------------- | --------------------------- |
| **Grafana Tempo** | Cost-effective, Grafana integration | Requires Grafana stack | Most production deployments |
| **Elastic APM** | Full observability stack, log correlation | Resource intensive | Existing Elastic users |
| **Honeycomb** | Excellent query, high cardinality | SaaS cost | Deep debugging needs |
| **Datadog APM** | Full platform, easy setup | SaaS cost | Enterprise with budget |
### Backend Selection Flowchart
```mermaid
flowchart TD
start[Select Backend] --> budget{Budget<br/>Constraints?}
budget -->|Yes| oss[Open Source]
budget -->|No| saas{Prefer<br/>SaaS?}
oss --> existing{Existing<br/>Stack?}
existing -->|Grafana| tempo[Grafana Tempo]
existing -->|Elastic| elastic[Elastic APM]
existing -->|None| tempo
saas -->|Yes| enterprise{Enterprise<br/>Support?}
saas -->|No| oss
enterprise -->|Yes| datadog[Datadog APM]
enterprise -->|No| honeycomb[Honeycomb]
tempo --> final[Configure Collector]
elastic --> final
honeycomb --> final
datadog --> final
style start fill:#0f172a,stroke:#020617,color:#fff
style budget fill:#334155,stroke:#1e293b,color:#fff
style oss fill:#1e293b,stroke:#0f172a,color:#fff
style existing fill:#334155,stroke:#1e293b,color:#fff
style saas fill:#334155,stroke:#1e293b,color:#fff
style enterprise fill:#334155,stroke:#1e293b,color:#fff
style final fill:#0f172a,stroke:#020617,color:#fff
style tempo fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#fff
style elastic fill:#bf360c,stroke:#8c2809,color:#fff
style honeycomb fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#fff
style datadog fill:#4a148c,stroke:#2e0d57,color:#fff
```
**Reading the diagram:**
- **Budget Constraints? (Yes)**: Leads to open-source options. If you already run Grafana or Elastic, pick the matching backend; otherwise default to Grafana Tempo.
- **Budget Constraints? (No) → Prefer SaaS?**: If you want a managed service, choose between Datadog (enterprise support) and Honeycomb (developer-focused). If not, fall back to open-source.
- **Terminal nodes (Tempo / Elastic / Honeycomb / Datadog)**: Each represents a concrete backend choice, all of which feed into the same final step.
- **Configure Collector**: Regardless of backend, you always finish by configuring the OTel Collector to export to your chosen destination.
---
## 7.3 Recommended Production Architecture
> **OTLP** = OpenTelemetry Protocol | **APM** = Application Performance Monitoring | **HA** = High Availability
```mermaid
flowchart TB
subgraph validators["Validator Nodes"]
v1[xrpld<br/>Validator 1]
v2[xrpld<br/>Validator 2]
end
subgraph stock["Stock Nodes"]
s1[xrpld<br/>Stock 1]
s2[xrpld<br/>Stock 2]
end
subgraph collector["OTel Collector Cluster"]
c1[Collector<br/>DC1]
c2[Collector<br/>DC2]
end
subgraph backends["Storage Backends"]
tempo[(Grafana<br/>Tempo)]
elastic[(Elastic<br/>APM)]
archive[(S3/GCS<br/>Archive)]
end
subgraph ui["Visualization"]
grafana[Grafana<br/>Dashboards]
end
v1 -->|OTLP| c1
v2 -->|OTLP| c1
s1 -->|OTLP| c2
s2 -->|OTLP| c2
c1 --> tempo
c1 --> elastic
c2 --> tempo
c2 --> archive
tempo --> grafana
elastic --> grafana
%% Note: simplified single-collector-per-DC topology shown for clarity
style validators fill:#b71c1c,stroke:#7f1d1d,color:#ffffff
style stock fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#ffffff
style collector fill:#bf360c,stroke:#8c2809,color:#ffffff
style backends fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#ffffff
style ui fill:#4a148c,stroke:#2e0d57,color:#ffffff
```
**Reading the diagram:**
- **Validator / Stock Nodes**: All xrpld nodes emit trace data via OTLP. Validators and stock nodes are grouped separately because they may reside in different network zones.
- **Collector Cluster (DC1, DC2)**: Regional collectors receive OTLP from nodes in their datacenter, apply processing (sampling, enrichment), and fan out to multiple backends. Enrichment includes deployment-tier tagging: each collector stamps `deployment.environment` and (as a fallback) `xrpl.network.type` so one Grafana stack can filter data from many collectors by tier.
- **Storage Backends**: Tempo and Elastic provide queryable trace storage; S3/GCS Archive provides long-term cold storage for compliance or post-incident analysis.
- **Grafana Dashboards**: The single visualization layer that queries both Tempo and Elastic, giving operators a unified view of all traces.
- **Data flow direction**: Nodes → Collectors → Storage → Grafana. Each arrow represents a network hop; minimizing collector-to-backend hops reduces latency.
> **Note**: Production deployments should use multiple collector instances behind a load balancer for high availability. The diagram shows a simplified single-collector topology for clarity.
---
## 7.4 Architecture Considerations
### 7.4.1 Collector Placement
| Strategy | Description | Pros | Cons |
| ------------- | -------------------- | ------------------------ | ----------------------- |
| **Sidecar** | Collector per node | Isolation, simple config | Resource overhead |
| **DaemonSet** | Collector per host | Shared resources | Complexity |
| **Gateway** | Central collector(s) | Centralized processing | Single point of failure |
**Recommendation**: Use **Gateway** pattern with regional collectors for xrpld networks:
- One collector cluster per datacenter/region
- Tail-based sampling at collector level
- Multiple export destinations for redundancy
### 7.4.2 Sampling Strategy
```mermaid
flowchart LR
subgraph head["Head Sampling (Node)"]
hs[Node-level head sampling<br/>fixed at 100%<br/>not configurable]
end
subgraph tail["Tail Sampling (Collector)"]
ts1[Keep all errors]
ts2[Keep slow >5s]
ts3[Keep 10% rest]
end
head --> tail
ts1 --> final[Final Traces]
ts2 --> final
ts3 --> final
style head fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#fff
style tail fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#fff
style hs fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#fff
style ts1 fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#fff
style ts2 fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#fff
style ts3 fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#fff
style final fill:#bf360c,stroke:#8c2809,color:#fff
```
**Reading the diagram:**
- **Head Sampling (Node)**: xrpld pins head sampling at 100% (sample everything) and does not expose a configurable ratio. This is intentional: a per-node ratio would let different nodes make divergent keep/drop decisions for the same distributed trace, producing broken/partial traces. xrpld uses a `ParentBased` sampler so spans inheriting a remote parent honor the upstream decision. Volume reduction is delegated to the collector's tail sampling.
- **Tail Sampling (Collector)**: The second filter -- the collector inspects completed traces and applies rules: keep all errors, keep anything slower than 5 seconds, and keep 10% of the remainder.
- **Arrow head → tail**: All head-sampled traces flow to the collector, where tail sampling further reduces volume while preserving the most valuable data.
- **Final Traces**: The output after both sampling stages; this is what gets stored and queried. The two-stage approach balances cost with debuggability.
### 7.4.3 Data Retention
| Environment | Hot Storage | Warm Storage | Cold Archive |
| ----------- | ----------- | ------------ | ------------ |
| Development | 24 hours | N/A | N/A |
| Staging | 7 days | N/A | N/A |
| Production | 7 days | 30 days | many years |
---
## 7.5 Integration Checklist
- [ ] Choose primary backend (Tempo recommended for cost/features)
- [ ] Deploy collector cluster with high availability
- [ ] Configure tail-based sampling for error/latency traces
- [ ] Set up Grafana dashboards for trace visualization
- [ ] Configure alerts for trace anomalies
- [ ] Establish data retention policies
- [ ] Test trace correlation with logs and metrics
---
## 7.6 Grafana Dashboard Examples
Pre-built dashboards for xrpld observability.
### 7.6.1 Consensus Health Dashboard
A Tempo-backed dashboard (uid `xrpld-consensus-health`) with four panels, all driven by TraceQL:
- **Consensus Round Duration** (timeseries, ms): average `consensus.round` span duration per node instance, with yellow/red thresholds at 4s/5s.
- **Phase Duration Breakdown** (barchart): average duration of `consensus.phase.*` spans grouped by span name.
- **Proposers per Round** (stat): average of the `span.proposers` attribute on `consensus.round` spans.
- **Recent Slow Rounds (>5s)** (table): `consensus.round` spans filtered to `duration > 5s`.
Each panel's TraceQL query is described inline in its bullet above.
### 7.6.2 Node Overview Dashboard
A Tempo-backed dashboard (uid `xrpld-node-overview`) with four panels:
- **Active Nodes** (stat): count of distinct `resource.service.instance.id` values seen for the `xrpld` service.
- **Total Transactions (1h)** (stat): count of `tx.receive` spans.
- **Error Rate** (gauge, percent): ratio of `status.code=error` spans to all spans, with yellow/red thresholds at 1%/5%.
- **Service Map** (nodeGraph): Tempo-generated service dependency graph.
### 7.6.3 Alert Rules
Grafana provisions three TraceQL-based alert rules (group `xrpld-tracing-alerts`, evaluated every 1m) against the Tempo datasource:
- **Consensus Round Slow** (warning, `for: 5m`): fires when average `consensus.round` duration exceeds 5s.
```
{resource.service.name="xrpld" && name="consensus.round"} | avg(duration) > 5s
```
- **RPC Error Rate Spike** (critical, `for: 2m`): fires when the error rate across `rpc.command.*` spans exceeds 5%. Error _rate_ is a ratio, so it must divide the error-span rate by the total-span rate — a single TraceQL `rate()` returns spans/second, not a percentage, and would fire on traffic volume alone. This uses span metrics emitted by the collector's `spanmetrics` connector (Prometheus datasource), not a TraceQL query:
```
sum(rate(traces_spanmetrics_calls_total{service_name="xrpld", span_name=~"rpc.command.*", status_code="STATUS_CODE_ERROR"}[5m]))
/
sum(rate(traces_spanmetrics_calls_total{service_name="xrpld", span_name=~"rpc.command.*"}[5m]))
> 0.05
```
- **Transaction Throughput Drop** (warning, `for: 10m`): fires when the `tx.receive` span rate falls below 10/s.
```
{resource.service.name="xrpld" && name="tx.receive"} | rate() < 10
```
> **Note**: The Consensus Round Slow and Transaction Throughput Drop rules use TraceQL aggregates (`avg(duration)`, `rate()`), which require Tempo 2.3+ with TraceQL metrics enabled. Verify aggregate query support in your Tempo version before provisioning. The RPC Error Rate Spike rule instead queries Prometheus span metrics (collector `spanmetrics` connector), so it needs that connector enabled in the collector pipeline.
---
## 7.7 PerfLog and Insight Correlation
> **OTLP** = OpenTelemetry Protocol
How to correlate OpenTelemetry traces with existing xrpld observability.
### 7.7.1 Correlation Architecture
```mermaid
flowchart TB
subgraph xrpld["xrpld Node"]
otel[OpenTelemetry<br/>Spans]
perflog[PerfLog<br/>JSON Logs]
insight[Beast Insight<br/>StatsD Metrics]
end
subgraph collectors["Data Collection"]
otelc[OTel Collector]
promtail[Promtail/Fluentd]
statsd[StatsD Exporter]
end
subgraph storage["Storage"]
tempo[(Tempo)]
loki[(Loki)]
prom[(Prometheus)]
end
subgraph grafana["Grafana"]
traces[Trace View]
logs[Log View]
metrics[Metrics View]
corr[Correlation<br/>Panel]
end
otel -->|OTLP| otelc --> tempo
perflog -->|JSON| promtail --> loki
insight -->|StatsD| statsd --> prom
tempo --> traces
loki --> logs
prom --> metrics
traces --> corr
logs --> corr
metrics --> corr
style xrpld fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#fff
style collectors fill:#bf360c,stroke:#8c2809,color:#fff
style storage fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#fff
style grafana fill:#4a148c,stroke:#2e0d57,color:#fff
style otel fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#fff
style perflog fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#fff
style insight fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#fff
style otelc fill:#bf360c,stroke:#8c2809,color:#fff
style promtail fill:#bf360c,stroke:#8c2809,color:#fff
style statsd fill:#bf360c,stroke:#8c2809,color:#fff
style tempo fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#fff
style loki fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#fff
style prom fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#fff
style traces fill:#4a148c,stroke:#2e0d57,color:#fff
style logs fill:#4a148c,stroke:#2e0d57,color:#fff
style metrics fill:#4a148c,stroke:#2e0d57,color:#fff
style corr fill:#4a148c,stroke:#2e0d57,color:#fff
```
**Reading the diagram:**
- **xrpld Node (three sources)**: A single node emits three independent data streams -- OpenTelemetry spans, PerfLog JSON logs, and Beast Insight StatsD metrics.
- **Data Collection layer**: Each stream has its own collector -- OTel Collector for spans, Promtail/Fluentd for logs, and a StatsD exporter for metrics. They operate independently.
- **Storage layer (Tempo, Loki, Prometheus)**: Each data type lands in a purpose-built store optimized for its query patterns (trace search, log grep, metric aggregation).
- **Grafana Correlation Panel**: The key integration point -- Grafana queries all three stores and links them via shared fields (`trace_id`, `tx_hash`, `ledger_seq`), enabling a single-pane debugging experience.
### 7.7.2 Correlation Fields
| Source | Field | Link To | Purpose |
| ----------- | ------------------- | ------------- | -------------------------- |
| **Trace** | `trace_id` | Logs | Find log entries for trace |
| **Trace** | `tx_hash` | Logs, Metrics | Find TX-related data |
| **Trace** | `ledger_seq` | Logs | Find ledger-related logs |
| **PerfLog** | `trace_id` (new) | Traces | Jump to trace from log |
| **PerfLog** | `ledger_seq` | Traces | Find consensus trace |
| **Insight** | `exemplar.trace_id` | Traces | Jump from metric spike |
### 7.7.3 Example: Debugging a Slow Transaction
**Step 1: Find the trace**
```
# In Grafana Explore with Tempo
{resource.service.name="xrpld" && span.tx_hash="ABC123..."}
```
**Step 2: Get the trace_id from the trace view**
```
Trace ID: 4bf92f3577b34da6a3ce929d0e0e4736
```
**Step 3: Find related PerfLog entries**
```
# In Grafana Explore with Loki
{job="xrpld"} |= "4bf92f3577b34da6a3ce929d0e0e4736"
```
**Step 4: Check Insight metrics for the time window**
```
# In Grafana with Prometheus
rate(xrpld_tx_applied_total[1m])
@ timestamp_from_trace
```
### 7.7.4 Unified Dashboard Example
A single dashboard (uid `xrpld-unified`) that ties traces, metrics, and logs together across the Tempo, Prometheus, and Loki datasources:
- **Transaction Latency (Traces)** (timeseries, Tempo): `histogram_over_time(duration)` of `tx.receive` spans.
- **Transaction Rate (Metrics)** (timeseries, Prometheus): `rate(xrpld_tx_received_total[5m])` per instance, with a data link that opens the matching `tx.receive` traces in Tempo.
- **Recent Logs** (logs, Loki): `{job="xrpld"} | json`.
- **Trace Search** (table, Tempo): all `xrpld` traces, with per-row data links on `traceID` that jump to the trace in Tempo and to the correlated logs in Loki (`{job="xrpld"} |= "<traceID>"`).
The cross-datasource data links are what make this a single-pane debugging view; the correlation fields they rely on are listed in section 7.7.2.
---
_Previous: [Implementation Phases](./06-implementation-phases.md)_ | _Next: [Appendix](./08-appendix.md)_ | _Back to: [Overview](./OpenTelemetryPlan.md)_

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,187 @@
# Appendix
> **Parent Document**: [OpenTelemetryPlan.md](./OpenTelemetryPlan.md)
> **Related**: [Observability Backends](./07-observability-backends.md)
---
## 8.1 Glossary
> **OTLP** = OpenTelemetry Protocol | **TxQ** = Transaction Queue
| Term | Definition |
| --------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------- |
| **Span** | A unit of work with start/end time, name, and attributes |
| **Trace** | A collection of spans representing a complete request flow |
| **Trace ID** | 128-bit unique identifier for a trace |
| **Span ID** | 64-bit unique identifier for a span within a trace |
| **Context** | Carrier for trace/span IDs across boundaries |
| **Propagator** | Component that injects/extracts context |
| **Sampler** | Decides which traces to record |
| **Exporter** | Sends spans to backend |
| **Collector** | Receives, processes, and forwards telemetry |
| **OTLP** | OpenTelemetry Protocol (wire format) |
| **W3C Trace Context** | Standard HTTP headers for trace propagation |
| **Baggage** | Key-value pairs propagated across service boundaries |
| **Resource** | Entity producing telemetry (service, host, etc.) |
| **Instrumentation** | Code that creates telemetry data |
### xrpld-Specific Terms
| Term | Definition |
| ----------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------- |
| **Overlay** | P2P network layer managing peer connections |
| **Consensus** | XRP Ledger consensus algorithm (RCL) |
| **Proposal** | Validator's suggested transaction set for a ledger |
| **Validation** | Validator's signature on a closed ledger |
| **HashRouter** | Component for transaction deduplication |
| **JobQueue** | Thread pool for asynchronous task execution |
| **PerfLog** | Existing performance logging system in xrpld |
| **Beast Insight** | Existing metrics framework in xrpld |
| **PathFinding** | Payment path computation engine for cross-currency payments |
| **TxQ** | Transaction queue managing fee-based prioritization |
| **LoadManager** | Dynamic fee escalation based on network load |
| **SHAMap** | SHA-256 hash-based map (Merkle trie variant) for ledger state |
---
## 8.2 Span Hierarchy Visualization
> **TxQ** = Transaction Queue
```mermaid
flowchart TB
subgraph trace["Trace: Transaction Lifecycle"]
rpc["rpc.request<br/>(entry point)"]
validate["tx.validate"]
relay["tx.relay<br/>(parent span)"]
subgraph peers["Peer Spans"]
p1["peer.send<br/>Peer A"]
p2["peer.send<br/>Peer B"]
p3["peer.send<br/>Peer C"]
end
subgraph pathfinding["PathFinding Spans"]
pathfind["pathfind.request"]
pathcomp["pathfind.compute"]
end
consensus["consensus.round"]
apply["tx.apply"]
subgraph txqueue["TxQ Spans"]
txq["txq.enqueue"]
txqApply["txq.apply"]
end
feeCalc["fee.escalate"]
end
subgraph validators["Validator Spans"]
valFetch["validator.list.fetch"]
valManifest["validator.manifest"]
end
rpc --> validate
rpc --> pathfind
pathfind --> pathcomp
validate --> relay
relay --> p1
relay --> p2
relay --> p3
p1 -.->|"context propagation"| consensus
consensus --> apply
apply --> txq
txq --> txqApply
txq --> feeCalc
style trace fill:#0f172a,stroke:#020617,color:#fff
style peers fill:#1e3a8a,stroke:#172554,color:#fff
style pathfinding fill:#134e4a,stroke:#0f766e,color:#fff
style txqueue fill:#064e3b,stroke:#047857,color:#fff
style validators fill:#4c1d95,stroke:#6d28d9,color:#fff
style rpc fill:#1d4ed8,stroke:#1e40af,color:#fff
style validate fill:#047857,stroke:#064e3b,color:#fff
style relay fill:#047857,stroke:#064e3b,color:#fff
style p1 fill:#0e7490,stroke:#155e75,color:#fff
style p2 fill:#0e7490,stroke:#155e75,color:#fff
style p3 fill:#0e7490,stroke:#155e75,color:#fff
style consensus fill:#fef3c7,stroke:#fde68a,color:#1e293b
style apply fill:#047857,stroke:#064e3b,color:#fff
style pathfind fill:#0e7490,stroke:#155e75,color:#fff
style pathcomp fill:#0e7490,stroke:#155e75,color:#fff
style txq fill:#047857,stroke:#064e3b,color:#fff
style txqApply fill:#047857,stroke:#064e3b,color:#fff
style feeCalc fill:#047857,stroke:#064e3b,color:#fff
style valFetch fill:#6d28d9,stroke:#4c1d95,color:#fff
style valManifest fill:#6d28d9,stroke:#4c1d95,color:#fff
```
**Reading the diagram:**
- **rpc.request (blue, top)**: The entry point — every traced transaction starts as an RPC call; this root span is the parent of all downstream work.
- **tx.validate and pathfind.request (green/teal, first fork)**: The RPC request fans out into transaction validation and, for cross-currency payments, a PathFinding branch (`pathfind.request` -> `pathfind.compute`).
- **tx.relay -> Peer Spans (teal, middle)**: After validation, the transaction is relayed to peers A, B, and C in parallel; each `peer.send` is a sibling child span showing fan-out across the network.
- **context propagation (dashed arrow)**: The dotted line from `peer.send Peer A` to `consensus.round` represents the trace context crossing a node boundary — the receiving validator picks up the same `trace_id` and continues the trace.
- **consensus.round -> tx.apply -> TxQ Spans (green, lower)**: Once consensus accepts the transaction, it is applied to the ledger; the TxQ spans (`txq.enqueue`, `txq.apply`, `fee.escalate`) capture queue depth and fee escalation behavior.
- **Validator Spans (purple, detached)**: `validator.list.fetch` and `validator.manifest` are independent workflows for UNL management — they run on their own traces and are linked to consensus via Span Links, not parent-child relationships.
---
## 8.3 References
> **OTLP** = OpenTelemetry Protocol
### OpenTelemetry Resources
1. [OpenTelemetry C++ SDK](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-cpp)
2. [OpenTelemetry Specification](https://opentelemetry.io/docs/specs/otel/)
3. [OpenTelemetry Collector](https://opentelemetry.io/docs/collector/)
4. [OTLP Protocol Specification](https://opentelemetry.io/docs/specs/otlp/)
### Standards
5. [W3C Trace Context](https://www.w3.org/TR/trace-context/)
6. [W3C Baggage](https://www.w3.org/TR/baggage/)
7. [Protocol Buffers](https://protobuf.dev/)
### xrpld Resources
8. [xrpld Source Code](https://github.com/XRPLF/rippled)
9. [XRP Ledger Documentation](https://xrpl.org/docs/)
10. [xrpld Overlay README](https://github.com/XRPLF/rippled/blob/develop/src/xrpld/overlay/README.md)
11. [xrpld RPC README](https://github.com/XRPLF/rippled/blob/develop/src/xrpld/rpc/README.md)
12. [xrpld Consensus README](https://github.com/XRPLF/rippled/blob/develop/src/xrpld/app/consensus/README.md)
---
## 8.4 Version History
| Version | Date | Author | Changes |
| ------- | ---------- | ------ | -------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 1.0 | 2026-02-12 | - | Initial implementation plan |
| 1.1 | 2026-02-13 | - | Refactored into modular documents |
| 1.2 | 2026-03-24 | - | Review fixes: accuracy corrections, cross-document consistency |
---
## 8.5 Document Index
### Plan Documents
| Document | Description |
| ---------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------- |
| [OpenTelemetryPlan.md](./OpenTelemetryPlan.md) | Master overview and executive summary |
| [00-tracing-fundamentals.md](./00-tracing-fundamentals.md) | Distributed tracing concepts and OTel primer |
| [01-architecture-analysis.md](./01-architecture-analysis.md) | xrpld architecture and trace points |
| [02-design-decisions.md](./02-design-decisions.md) | SDK selection, exporters, span conventions |
| [03-implementation-strategy.md](./03-implementation-strategy.md) | Directory structure, performance analysis |
| [05-configuration-reference.md](./05-configuration-reference.md) | xrpld config, CMake, Collector configs |
| [06-implementation-phases.md](./06-implementation-phases.md) | Timeline, tasks, risks, success metrics |
| [07-observability-backends.md](./07-observability-backends.md) | Backend selection and architecture |
| [08-appendix.md](./08-appendix.md) | Glossary, references, version history |
---
_Previous: [Observability Backends](./07-observability-backends.md)_ | _Back to: [Overview](./OpenTelemetryPlan.md)_

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,199 @@
# [OpenTelemetry](00-tracing-fundamentals.md) Distributed Tracing Implementation Plan for xrpld
## Executive Summary
> **OTLP** = OpenTelemetry Protocol
This document provides a comprehensive implementation plan for integrating OpenTelemetry distributed tracing into the xrpld XRP Ledger node software. The plan addresses the unique challenges of a decentralized peer-to-peer system where trace context must propagate across network boundaries between independent nodes.
### Key Benefits
- **End-to-end transaction visibility**: Track transactions from submission through consensus to ledger inclusion
- **Consensus round analysis**: Understand timing and behavior of consensus phases across validators
- **RPC performance insights**: Identify slow handlers and optimize response times
- **Network topology understanding**: Visualize message propagation patterns between peers
- **Incident debugging**: Correlate events across distributed nodes during issues
### Estimated Performance Overhead
| Metric | Overhead | Notes |
| ------------- | ---------- | ------------------------------------------------ |
| CPU | 1-3% | Span creation and attribute setting |
| Memory | <10 MB | SDK statics + batch buffer + worker thread stack |
| Network | 10-50 KB/s | Compressed OTLP export to collector |
| Latency (p99) | <2% | With proper sampling configuration |
---
## Document Structure
This implementation plan is organized into modular documents for easier navigation:
<div align="center">
```mermaid
flowchart TB
overview["📋 OpenTelemetryPlan.md<br/>(This Document)"]
subgraph fundamentals["Fundamentals"]
fund["00-tracing-fundamentals.md"]
end
subgraph analysis["Analysis & Design"]
arch["01-architecture-analysis.md"]
design["02-design-decisions.md"]
end
subgraph impl["Implementation"]
strategy["03-implementation-strategy.md"]
config["05-configuration-reference.md"]
end
subgraph deploy["Deployment & Planning"]
phases["06-implementation-phases.md"]
backends["07-observability-backends.md"]
appendix["08-appendix.md"]
end
overview --> fundamentals
overview --> analysis
overview --> impl
overview --> deploy
fund --> arch
arch --> design
design --> strategy
strategy --> config
config --> phases
phases --> backends
backends --> appendix
style overview fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#0d3d14,color:#fff,stroke-width:2px
style fundamentals fill:#00695c,stroke:#004d40,color:#fff
style fund fill:#00695c,stroke:#004d40,color:#fff
style analysis fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#fff
style impl fill:#bf360c,stroke:#8c2809,color:#fff
style deploy fill:#4a148c,stroke:#2e0d57,color:#fff
style arch fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#fff
style design fill:#0d47a1,stroke:#082f6a,color:#fff
style strategy fill:#bf360c,stroke:#8c2809,color:#fff
style config fill:#bf360c,stroke:#8c2809,color:#fff
style phases fill:#4a148c,stroke:#2e0d57,color:#fff
style backends fill:#4a148c,stroke:#2e0d57,color:#fff
style appendix fill:#4a148c,stroke:#2e0d57,color:#fff
```
</div>
---
## Table of Contents
| Section | Document | Description |
| ------- | ---------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| **0** | [Tracing Fundamentals](./00-tracing-fundamentals.md) | Distributed tracing concepts, span relationships, context propagation |
| **1** | [Architecture Analysis](./01-architecture-analysis.md) | xrpld component analysis, trace points, instrumentation priorities |
| **2** | [Design Decisions](./02-design-decisions.md) | SDK selection, exporters, span naming, attributes, context propagation |
| **3** | [Implementation Strategy](./03-implementation-strategy.md) | Directory structure, key principles, performance optimization |
| **5** | [Configuration Reference](./05-configuration-reference.md) | xrpld config, CMake integration, Collector configurations |
| **6** | [Implementation Phases](./06-implementation-phases.md) | 5-phase timeline, tasks, risks, success metrics |
| **7** | [Observability Backends](./07-observability-backends.md) | Backend selection guide and production architecture |
| **8** | [Appendix](./08-appendix.md) | Glossary, references, version history |
---
## 0. Tracing Fundamentals
This document introduces distributed tracing concepts for readers unfamiliar with the domain. It covers what traces and spans are, how parent-child and follows-from relationships model causality, how context propagates across service boundaries, and how sampling controls data volume. It also maps these concepts to xrpld-specific scenarios like transaction relay and consensus.
➡️ **[Read Tracing Fundamentals](./00-tracing-fundamentals.md)**
---
## 1. Architecture Analysis
> **WS** = WebSocket | **TxQ** = Transaction Queue
The xrpld node consists of several key components that require instrumentation for comprehensive distributed tracing. The main areas include the RPC server (HTTP/WebSocket), Overlay P2P network, Consensus mechanism (RCLConsensus), JobQueue for async task execution, PathFinding, Transaction Queue (TxQ), fee escalation (LoadManager), ledger acquisition, validator management, and existing observability infrastructure (PerfLog, Insight/StatsD, Journal logging).
Key trace points span across transaction submission via RPC, peer-to-peer message propagation, consensus round execution, ledger building, path computation, transaction queue behavior, fee escalation, and validator health. The implementation prioritizes high-value, low-risk components first: RPC handlers provide immediate value with minimal risk, while consensus tracing requires careful implementation to avoid timing impacts.
➡️ **[Read full Architecture Analysis](./01-architecture-analysis.md)**
---
## 2. Design Decisions
> **OTLP** = OpenTelemetry Protocol | **CNCF** = Cloud Native Computing Foundation
The OpenTelemetry C++ SDK is selected for its CNCF backing, active development, and native performance characteristics. Traces are exported via OTLP/HTTP to an OpenTelemetry Collector, which provides flexible routing and sampling. OTLP/gRPC is planned future work (see design decisions §2.2.2).
Span naming follows a hierarchical `<component>.<operation>` convention (e.g., `rpc.submit`, `tx.relay`, `consensus.round`). Context propagation uses W3C Trace Context headers for HTTP and embedded Protocol Buffer fields for P2P messages. The implementation coexists with existing PerfLog and Insight observability systems through correlation IDs.
**Data Collection & Privacy**: Telemetry collects only operational metadata (timing, counts, hashes) — never sensitive content (private keys, balances, amounts, raw payloads). Privacy protection includes account hashing, configurable redaction, sampling, and collector-level filtering. Node operators retain full control over telemetry configuration.
➡️ **[Read full Design Decisions](./02-design-decisions.md)**
---
## 3. Implementation Strategy
The telemetry code is organized under `include/xrpl/telemetry/` for headers and `src/libxrpl/telemetry/` for implementation. Key principles include RAII-based span management via `SpanGuard`, conditional compilation with `XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY`, and minimal runtime overhead through batch processing and efficient sampling.
Performance optimization strategies include head sampling fixed at 100% (intentionally not configurable, so trace keep/drop decisions stay coherent across nodes), tail-based sampling at the collector for errors and slow traces to reduce volume, batch export to reduce network overhead, and conditional instrumentation that compiles to no-ops when disabled.
➡️ **[Read full Implementation Strategy](./03-implementation-strategy.md)**
---
## 5. Configuration Reference
> **OTLP** = OpenTelemetry Protocol | **APM** = Application Performance Monitoring
Configuration is handled through the `[telemetry]` section in `xrpld.cfg` with options for enabling/disabling, exporter selection, endpoint configuration, and component-level filtering. Head sampling is fixed at 1.0 (not operator-configurable); volume reduction is done by tail sampling in the collector. CMake integration includes a `XRPL_ENABLE_TELEMETRY` option for compile-time control.
OpenTelemetry Collector configurations are provided for development and production (with tail-based sampling, Tempo, and Elastic APM). Docker Compose examples enable quick local development environment setup.
➡️ **[View full Configuration Reference](./05-configuration-reference.md)**
---
## 6. Implementation Phases
The implementation spans 9 weeks across 5 phases:
| Phase | Duration | Focus | Key Deliverables |
| ----- | --------- | ------------------- | --------------------------------------------------- |
| 1 | Weeks 1-2 | Core Infrastructure | SDK integration, Telemetry interface, Configuration |
| 2 | Weeks 3-4 | RPC Tracing | HTTP context extraction, Handler instrumentation |
| 3 | Weeks 5-6 | Transaction Tracing | Protocol Buffer context, Relay propagation |
| 4 | Weeks 7-8 | Consensus Tracing | Round spans, Proposal/validation tracing |
| 5 | Week 9 | Documentation | Runbook, Dashboards, Training |
**Total Effort**: 47 person-days (2 developers working in parallel)
➡️ **[View full Implementation Phases](./06-implementation-phases.md)**
---
## 7. Observability Backends
> **APM** = Application Performance Monitoring | **GCS** = Google Cloud Storage
Grafana Tempo is recommended for all environments due to its cost-effectiveness and Grafana integration, while Elastic APM is ideal for organizations with existing Elastic infrastructure.
The recommended production architecture uses a gateway collector pattern with regional collectors performing tail-based sampling, routing traces to multiple backends (Tempo for primary storage, Elastic for log correlation, S3/GCS for long-term archive).
➡️ **[View Observability Backend Recommendations](./07-observability-backends.md)**
---
## 8. Appendix
The appendix contains a glossary of OpenTelemetry and xrpld-specific terms, references to external documentation and specifications, version history for this implementation plan, and a complete document index.
➡️ **[View Appendix](./08-appendix.md)**
---
_This document provides a comprehensive implementation plan for integrating OpenTelemetry distributed tracing into the xrpld XRP Ledger node software. For detailed information on any section, follow the links to the corresponding sub-documents._

View File

@@ -30,8 +30,10 @@ missing=()
checked=0
# check <name> [probe-command...]
# Runs the probe (default: "<name> --version") quietly. Records <name> as
# missing if the command is not found or exits non-zero.
# Runs the probe (default: "<name> --version"), capturing both stdout and
# stderr, and prints one aligned line: the status, the name, and the first
# non-blank line of the probe output (its version). Records <name> as missing
# if the command is not found or exits non-zero.
check() {
local name="$1"
shift
@@ -40,10 +42,11 @@ check() {
probe=("${name}" --version)
fi
echo "Checking ${name}..."
checked=$((checked + 1))
if "${probe[@]}" | head -n 1; then
printf ' [ ok ] %s\n' "${name}"
local output version
if output="$("${probe[@]}" 2>&1)"; then
version="$(printf '%s\n' "${output}" | grep -m1 '[^[:space:]]' || true)"
printf ' [ ok ] %-20s %s\n' "${name}" "${version}"
else
printf ' [MISS] %s\n' "${name}"
missing+=("${name}")
@@ -85,12 +88,14 @@ if [ "${os}" = "linux" ] || [ "${os}" = "macos" ]; then
check file
check less
check make
check netstat which netstat
# net-tools netstat reports "net-tools X.Y"; macOS ships BSD netstat with no
# version flag, so fall back to a presence marker there.
check netstat sh -c 'command -v netstat >/dev/null && { netstat --version 2>&1 | grep -m1 -oE "net-tools [0-9.]+" || echo present; }'
check ninja
check perl
check perl perl -e 'print "$^V\n"'
check pkg-config
check vim
check zip
check zip bash -c 'zip --version 2>&1 | grep -m1 -oE "Zip [0-9.]+"'
# These tools are present in our Linux CI images and in local development
# setups, but not in the macOS CI environment. So check them everywhere

55
bin/pre-commit/Dockerfile Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
ARG BASE_IMAGE=ubuntu:26.04
FROM ${BASE_IMAGE}
SHELL ["/bin/bash", "-e", "-o", "pipefail", "-c"]
ENTRYPOINT ["/bin/bash"]
ARG DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive
RUN <<EOF
pkgs=()
pkgs+=(curl) # Required to install nix.
pkgs+=(doxygen) # Needed for Clio's check-doxygen-docs.sh.
pkgs+=(git) # Required for prepare-runner.
pkgs+=(libatomic1) # Required to run pre-commit provided `node`.
pkgs+=(python3) # Python 3 interpreter.
pkgs+=(python3-pip) # Package manager for Python applications.
pkgs+=(xz-utils) # Required to install nix
apt-get update
apt-get install -y --no-install-recommends "${pkgs[@]}"
apt-get clean
rm -rf /var/lib/apt/lists/*
EOF
ARG PRE_COMMIT_VERSION=4.6.0
RUN pip install --no-cache --break-system-packages \
pre-commit==${PRE_COMMIT_VERSION}
RUN sh <(curl --proto '=https' --tlsv1.2 -L https://nixos.org/nix/install) --daemon --yes
# Add nix to PATH and set NIX environment variables,
# so nix is available in all shells including non-interactive shells (e.g., GitHub Actions).
ENV PATH="/nix/var/nix/profiles/default/bin:${PATH}"
ENV NIX_PROFILES="/nix/var/nix/profiles/default"
ENV NIX_SSL_CERT_FILE="/nix/var/nix/profiles/default/etc/ssl/certs/ca-bundle.crt"
# Verify nix installation
RUN nix --version
ENV RUSTUP_HOME="/opt/rust/rustup"
ENV CARGO_HOME="/opt/rust/cargo"
ENV PATH="/opt/rust/cargo/bin:${PATH}"
WORKDIR /tmp
COPY rust-toolchain.toml /tmp/rust-toolchain.toml
RUN <<EOF
curl --proto '=https' --tlsv1.2 -sSf https://sh.rustup.rs \
| sh -s -- -y --no-modify-path --profile minimal --default-toolchain none
rustup toolchain install
rustup show
cargo fmt --version
EOF
WORKDIR /

View File

@@ -29,6 +29,27 @@ if(CMAKE_GENERATOR STREQUAL "Xcode")
set(is_xcode TRUE)
endif()
# --------------------------------------------------------------------
# Nix toolchain detection
# --------------------------------------------------------------------
# True when the C++ compiler resolves into the Nix store. CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER may
# be referenced through a symlink outside the store (a Nix profile, a /usr/bin
# alternative, ...), so resolve the real path before matching.
set(is_nix_compiler FALSE)
get_filename_component(_cxx_real "${CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER}" REALPATH)
if(_cxx_real MATCHES "^/nix/store/")
set(is_nix_compiler TRUE)
endif()
unset(_cxx_real)
# True inside the Nix CI Docker image, identified by the /nix/ci-env tree it
# ships (see nix/docker/Dockerfile). The dev shell and bare systems don't have
# it, so it distinguishes the CI image from other Nix-compiler environments.
set(is_ci_image FALSE)
if(EXISTS "/nix/ci-env/bin")
set(is_ci_image TRUE)
endif()
# --------------------------------------------------------------------
# Operating system detection
# --------------------------------------------------------------------

View File

@@ -1,26 +1,37 @@
#[===================================================================[
Patch executables to run in non-Nix environments.
The Nix-based CI image links binaries against an ELF interpreter (loader)
that lives in the Nix store, so the resulting binaries don't run elsewhere
(including once installed from the .deb package). `patch_nix_binary` adds a
POST_BUILD step that resets the interpreter to the system default loader and
drops the rpath.
The Nix toolchain links binaries against an ELF interpreter (loader)
that lives in the Nix store, so the resulting binaries don't run elsewhere.
`patch_nix_binary` adds a POST_BUILD step that resets the interpreter
to the system default loader and drops the rpath.
This is only active inside the Nix-based image, detected by the presence of
/tmp/loader-path.sh (shipped by that image, resolves the default loader). It
is skipped for sanitizer builds, whose runtime libraries are resolved through
the rpath. Everywhere else `patch_nix_binary` is a no-op.
This runs by default for Nix-toolchain builds (determined by whether the compiler resolves under /nix/store/).
Those builds are where binaries get a Nix-store loader.
It is opted out of by setting the XRPLD_NO_PATCH_NIX_BINARY environment variable
the plain Nix dev shells set it, since their binaries link a newer glibc
and must not be retargeted to the system loader.
Non-Nix builds (a system compiler, already using the system loader) and sanitizer builds
(runtime libraries resolved through the rpath) are skipped too.
Everywhere else `patch_nix_binary` is a no-op.
The default loader is resolved by bin/default-loader-path.sh.
#]===================================================================]
include_guard(GLOBAL)
include(CompilationEnv)
# Provided by the Nix-based CI image; prints the system default ELF loader path.
set(_loader_path_script "/tmp/loader-path.sh")
# Resolves the system default ELF loader path for the current architecture.
set(_loader_path_script "${CMAKE_SOURCE_DIR}/bin/default-loader-path.sh")
if(is_linux AND NOT SANITIZERS_ENABLED AND EXISTS "${_loader_path_script}")
if(
is_linux
AND NOT SANITIZERS_ENABLED
AND is_nix_compiler
AND NOT DEFINED ENV{XRPLD_NO_PATCH_NIX_BINARY}
)
execute_process(
COMMAND "${_loader_path_script}"
OUTPUT_VARIABLE DEFAULT_LOADER_PATH

View File

@@ -171,9 +171,8 @@ else()
# Clang wrapper supplies those paths itself (via -nostdinc++), so at compile time the
# flag is unused -> Clang errors under our -Werror. At link time the flag IS consumed
# (it selects the C++ runtime), so we move it there instead of dropping it entirely.
get_filename_component(_cxx_real "${CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER}" REALPATH)
if(
_cxx_real MATCHES "^/nix/store/"
is_nix_compiler
AND is_linux
AND is_clang
AND CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS MATCHES "stdlib=libstdc"

View File

@@ -133,6 +133,12 @@ target_link_libraries(
add_module(xrpl resource)
target_link_libraries(xrpl.libxrpl.resource PUBLIC xrpl.libxrpl.protocol)
add_module(xrpl peerfinder)
target_link_libraries(
xrpl.libxrpl.peerfinder
PUBLIC xrpl.libxrpl.basics xrpl.libxrpl.protocol
)
# Level 08
add_module(xrpl net)
target_link_libraries(
@@ -201,6 +207,16 @@ target_link_libraries(
add_module(xrpl tx)
target_link_libraries(xrpl.libxrpl.tx PUBLIC xrpl.libxrpl.ledger)
add_module(xrpl consensus)
target_link_libraries(
xrpl.libxrpl.consensus
PUBLIC
xrpl.libxrpl.basics
xrpl.libxrpl.json
xrpl.libxrpl.protocol
xrpl.libxrpl.ledger
)
add_library(xrpl.libxrpl)
set_target_properties(xrpl.libxrpl PROPERTIES OUTPUT_NAME xrpl)
@@ -220,6 +236,7 @@ target_link_modules(
beast
conditions
config
consensus
core
crypto
git
@@ -227,6 +244,7 @@ target_link_modules(
ledger
net
nodestore
peerfinder
protocol
protocol_autogen
rdb

View File

@@ -36,6 +36,19 @@ elseif(is_gcc)
endif()
endif()
# A Nix compiler is only meant to be used from a managed environment: the xrpld
# dev shell (which exports XRPL_DEVSHELL) or the CI image. Using one from a bare
# shell usually means a leaked toolchain (picked up via PATH or a Conan profile)
# and leads to confusing breakage, so fail early with guidance.
if(is_nix_compiler AND NOT is_ci_image AND NOT DEFINED ENV{XRPL_DEVSHELL})
message(
FATAL_ERROR
"A Nix compiler (${CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER}) is being used outside the xrpld "
"dev shell. Enter it with `nix develop` (see docs/build/nix.md) before "
"configuring the build."
)
endif()
# check for in-source build and fail
if("${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}" STREQUAL "${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}")
message(

View File

@@ -20,6 +20,22 @@ compiler.libcxx={{ detect_api.detect_libcxx(compiler, version, compiler_exe) }}
{% endif %}
[conf]
{# The Boost recipe builds with b2, which doesn't use Conan's toolchain files. #}
{# Instead it hand-rolls the compiler for user-config.jam, #}
{# and its fallback probes a version-suffixed binary (e.g. `g++-15`) before plain `g++`. #}
{# Inside the Nix shell the wrapper only provides `g++`/`gcc` (no `-15` suffix), #}
{# so on a host that also has a system `g++-15` the probe escapes Nix #}
{# and picks the system compiler, which is mismatched with the Nix libraries #}
{# and breaks the build (e.g. Boost.Stacktrace link checks fail). #}
{# Pinning the executables here short-circuits that probe so Boost (and the rest of the toolchain) #}
{# resolve the same compiler. #}
{# Not part of the package ID, so binaries stay shareable. #}
{% if os != "Windows" %}
{% set cc_exe = {"gcc": "gcc", "clang": "clang", "apple-clang": "clang"}.get(compiler) %}
{% set cxx_exe = {"gcc": "g++", "clang": "clang++", "apple-clang": "clang++"}.get(compiler) %}
tools.build:compiler_executables={'c':'{{ cc_exe }}','cpp':'{{ cxx_exe }}'}
{% endif %}
{# By default, Conan tries to reuse binaries built with different cppstd versions. #}
{# We want to avoid that to improve reproduceability, so we add the cppstd version to the package ID. #}
{# More info: https://docs.conan.io/2/reference/extensions/binary_compatibility.html #}

38
docs/build/nix.md vendored
View File

@@ -38,8 +38,10 @@ The first time you run this command, it will take a few minutes to download and
### Platform notes
- **Linux**: `nix develop` gives you a shell with all the tooling necessary to
develop xrpld and with GCC 15.2 (also provided by Nix). There are no caveats.
- **Linux**: `nix develop` gives you a shell with all the tooling necessary to develop xrpld
and with the same GCC/glibc toolchain that Nix builds for CI.
See [Choosing a different compiler](#choosing-a-different-compiler)
for the custom-vs-plain toolchain trade-off.
- **macOS**: `nix develop` gives you a full environment too, with Clang (and
every other tool, including Conan) provided by Nix. To use your system-wide
Apple Clang instead, enter `nix develop .#apple-clang`. Conan has no binary in
@@ -63,8 +65,16 @@ The first time you run this command, it will take a few minutes to download and
### Choosing a different compiler
A compiler can be chosen by providing its name with the `.#` prefix, e.g. `nix develop .#clang`.
The `.#gcc` and `.#clang` shells provide the same GCC and Clang versions used in CI
(pinned in [`nix/packages.nix`](../../nix/packages.nix)).
On Linux, `.#gcc` and `.#clang` provide the exact toolchain CI uses:
the compiler (pinned in [`nix/packages.nix`](../../nix/packages.nix))
rebuilt against the pinned custom glibc (see [`nix/compilers.nix`](../../nix/compilers.nix)).
Building that toolchain the first time is slow unless it is fetched from a Nix binary cache.
If you don't need the custom glibc, the Linux-only `.#gcc-plain` and `.#clang-plain`
give you the stock nixpkgs compilers of the same versions.
On macOS there is no custom glibc, so `.#gcc` and `.#clang` are already the plain nixpkgs toolchain,
and the `-plain` variants do not exist.
Use `nix flake show` to see all the available development shells.
Use `nix develop .#no-compiler` to use the compiler from your system.
@@ -72,14 +82,18 @@ Use `nix develop .#no-compiler` to use the compiler from your system.
### Example Usage
```bash
# Use GCC (same version as CI)
# Use GCC same toolchain as CI (custom glibc on Linux)
nix develop .#gcc
# Use Clang (same version as CI)
# Use Clang same toolchain as CI (custom glibc on Linux)
nix develop .#clang
# Use default for your platform
nix develop
# Stock nixpkgs GCC/Clang, Linux only — skips the custom-glibc build, but does not match CI
nix develop .#gcc-plain
nix develop .#clang-plain
```
### Using a different shell
@@ -110,6 +124,10 @@ nix develop -c "$SHELL"
Once inside the Nix development shell, follow the standard [build instructions](../../BUILD.md#steps). The Nix shell provides all necessary tools (CMake, Ninja, Conan, etc.).
Coverage builds (`-Dcoverage=ON`) work in the `gcc` shell (and `gcc-plain` on Linux):
each ships a `gcov` matching its compiler, since Nix's cc-wrapper does not expose one.
The `clang` shells do not include `llvm-cov`, so use a `gcc` shell for coverage.
## Automatic Activation with direnv
[direnv](https://direnv.net/) or [nix-direnv](https://github.com/nix-community/nix-direnv) can automatically activate the Nix development shell when you enter the repository directory.
@@ -136,6 +154,14 @@ conan install .. --output-folder . --build '*' --settings build_type=Release
To update `flake.lock` to the latest revision use `nix flake update` command.
## Tooling snapshots
The tool versions in each Nix environment are recorded in
[`nix/check-tools/`](../../nix/check-tools) and verified by CI. If you change the
environment (bump the CI image tag, update `flake.lock`, or edit the tool list in
`bin/check-tools.sh`), CI fails until you regenerate and commit the affected
snapshot — see [`nix/check-tools/README.md`](../../nix/check-tools/README.md).
## Troubleshooting
See [Troubleshooting Nix problems](./nix_troubleshooting.md) for common issues,

23
flake.lock generated
View File

@@ -36,7 +36,28 @@
"root": {
"inputs": {
"nixpkgs": "nixpkgs",
"nixpkgs-custom-glibc": "nixpkgs-custom-glibc"
"nixpkgs-custom-glibc": "nixpkgs-custom-glibc",
"rust-overlay": "rust-overlay"
}
},
"rust-overlay": {
"inputs": {
"nixpkgs": [
"nixpkgs"
]
},
"locked": {
"lastModified": 1784611586,
"narHash": "sha256-OfqgY+0hp/zseZB7uyH0U8kIDPS4scZZCyAurEplvG0=",
"owner": "oxalica",
"repo": "rust-overlay",
"rev": "14f58845249f3552a89b07772626b8d3c632fa86",
"type": "github"
},
"original": {
"owner": "oxalica",
"repo": "rust-overlay",
"type": "github"
}
}
},

View File

@@ -10,12 +10,25 @@
url = "github:NixOS/nixpkgs/9cd98386a38891d1074fc18036b842dc4416f562";
flake = false;
};
# Pinned Rust toolchains, delivered from the Nix store. Lets the Nix CI
# image and dev shell honour the single `rust-toolchain.toml` pin (shared
# with the rustup-based non-Nix runners) while staying hermetic — the
# toolchain lands in the image's Nix closure and is locked by flake.lock.
rust-overlay = {
url = "github:oxalica/rust-overlay";
inputs.nixpkgs.follows = "nixpkgs";
};
};
outputs =
{ nixpkgs, nixpkgs-custom-glibc, ... }:
{
nixpkgs,
nixpkgs-custom-glibc,
rust-overlay,
...
}:
let
forEachSystem = import ./nix/utils.nix { inherit nixpkgs nixpkgs-custom-glibc; };
forEachSystem = import ./nix/utils.nix { inherit nixpkgs nixpkgs-custom-glibc rust-overlay; };
in
{
devShells = forEachSystem (import ./nix/devshell.nix);

View File

@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
#include <xrpl/beast/container/detail/aged_associative_container.h>
#include <xrpl/beast/container/detail/aged_container_iterator.h>
#include <xrpl/beast/container/detail/empty_base_optimization.h>
#include <xrpl/beast/utility/instrumentation.h>
#include <boost/intrusive/list.hpp>
#include <boost/intrusive/unordered_set.hpp>

View File

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
namespace xrpl {
template <class TxID, class Sequence>
class RCLCensorshipDetector
class CensorshipDetector
{
public:
struct TxIDSeq
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ private:
TxIDSeqVec tracker_;
public:
RCLCensorshipDetector() = default;
CensorshipDetector() = default;
/**
* Add transactions being proposed for the current consensus round.

View File

@@ -1,15 +1,14 @@
#pragma once
#include <xrpld/consensus/ConsensusParms.h>
#include <xrpld/consensus/ConsensusProposal.h>
#include <xrpld/consensus/ConsensusTypes.h>
#include <xrpl/basics/Log.h>
#include <xrpl/basics/UnorderedContainers.h>
#include <xrpl/basics/chrono.h>
#include <xrpl/beast/clock/abstract_clock.h>
#include <xrpl/beast/utility/Journal.h>
#include <xrpl/beast/utility/instrumentation.h>
#include <xrpl/consensus/ConsensusParms.h>
#include <xrpl/consensus/ConsensusProposal.h>
#include <xrpl/consensus/ConsensusTypes.h>
#include <xrpl/json/json_value.h>
#include <xrpl/json/json_writer.h>
#include <xrpl/ledger/LedgerTiming.h>

View File

@@ -1,11 +1,10 @@
#pragma once
#include <xrpld/consensus/ConsensusProposal.h>
#include <xrpld/consensus/DisputedTx.h>
#include <xrpl/basics/UnorderedContainers.h>
#include <xrpl/basics/chrono.h>
#include <xrpl/beast/utility/instrumentation.h>
#include <xrpl/consensus/ConsensusProposal.h>
#include <xrpl/consensus/DisputedTx.h>
#include <chrono>
#include <cstddef>

View File

@@ -1,9 +1,8 @@
#pragma once
#include <xrpld/consensus/ConsensusParms.h>
#include <xrpl/basics/Log.h>
#include <xrpl/beast/utility/Journal.h>
#include <xrpl/consensus/ConsensusParms.h>
#include <xrpl/json/json_value.h>
#include <xrpl/json/json_writer.h>

View File

@@ -1,7 +1,5 @@
#pragma once
#include <xrpld/consensus/LedgerTrie.h>
#include <xrpl/basics/Log.h>
#include <xrpl/basics/UnorderedContainers.h>
#include <xrpl/basics/chrono.h>
@@ -11,6 +9,7 @@
#include <xrpl/beast/hash/uhash.h>
#include <xrpl/beast/utility/Journal.h>
#include <xrpl/beast/utility/instrumentation.h>
#include <xrpl/consensus/LedgerTrie.h>
#include <xrpl/json/json_value.h>
#include <algorithm>

View File

@@ -15,9 +15,9 @@
namespace xrpl {
// Forward declarations
namespace NodeStore {
namespace node_store {
class Database;
} // namespace NodeStore
} // namespace node_store
namespace Resource {
class Manager;
} // namespace Resource
@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ public:
getResourceManager() = 0;
// Storage services
virtual NodeStore::Database&
virtual node_store::Database&
getNodeStore() = 0;
virtual SHAMapStore&

View File

@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
#include <stdexcept>
#include <string>
namespace xrpl::NodeStore {
namespace xrpl::node_store {
/**
* A backend used for the NodeStore.
@@ -163,4 +163,4 @@ public:
fdRequired() const = 0;
};
} // namespace xrpl::NodeStore
} // namespace xrpl::node_store

View File

@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ namespace xrpl {
class Section;
} // namespace xrpl
namespace xrpl::NodeStore {
namespace xrpl::node_store {
/**
* Persistency layer for NodeObject
@@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ protected:
void
storeStats(std::uint64_t count, std::uint64_t sz)
{
XRPL_ASSERT(count <= sz, "xrpl::NodeStore::Database::storeStats : valid inputs");
XRPL_ASSERT(count <= sz, "xrpl::node_store::Database::storeStats : valid inputs");
storeCount_ += count;
storeSz_ += sz;
}
@@ -308,4 +308,4 @@ private:
threadEntry();
};
} // namespace xrpl::NodeStore
} // namespace xrpl::node_store

View File

@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
#include <memory>
#include <string>
namespace xrpl::NodeStore {
namespace xrpl::node_store {
/* This class has two key-value store Backend objects for persisting SHAMap
* records. This facilitates online deletion of data. New backends are
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ public:
*/
virtual void
rotate(
std::unique_ptr<NodeStore::Backend>&& newBackend,
std::unique_ptr<node_store::Backend>&& newBackend,
std::function<void(std::string const& writableName, std::string const& archiveName)> const&
f) = 0;
@@ -56,4 +56,4 @@ public:
setRotationInFlight(bool inFlight) = 0;
};
} // namespace xrpl::NodeStore
} // namespace xrpl::node_store

View File

@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
#include <xrpl/nodestore/Scheduler.h>
#include <xrpl/nodestore/Task.h>
namespace xrpl::NodeStore {
namespace xrpl::node_store {
/**
* Simple NodeStore Scheduler that just performs the tasks synchronously.
@@ -21,4 +21,4 @@ public:
onBatchWrite(BatchWriteReport const& report) override;
};
} // namespace xrpl::NodeStore
} // namespace xrpl::node_store

View File

@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ namespace xrpl {
class Section;
} // namespace xrpl
namespace xrpl::NodeStore {
namespace xrpl::node_store {
/**
* Base class for backend factories.
@@ -70,4 +70,4 @@ public:
}
};
} // namespace xrpl::NodeStore
} // namespace xrpl::node_store

View File

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
#include <memory>
#include <string>
namespace xrpl::NodeStore {
namespace xrpl::node_store {
/**
* Singleton for managing NodeStore factories and back ends.
@@ -98,4 +98,4 @@ public:
beast::Journal journal) = 0;
};
} // namespace xrpl::NodeStore
} // namespace xrpl::node_store

View File

@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
#include <cstdint>
#include <memory>
// VFALCO NOTE Intentionally not in the NodeStore namespace
// VFALCO NOTE Intentionally not in the node_store namespace
namespace xrpl {

View File

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
#include <chrono>
namespace xrpl::NodeStore {
namespace xrpl::node_store {
enum class FetchType { Synchronous, Async };
@@ -71,4 +71,4 @@ public:
onBatchWrite(BatchWriteReport const& report) = 0;
};
} // namespace xrpl::NodeStore
} // namespace xrpl::node_store

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
#pragma once
namespace xrpl::NodeStore {
namespace xrpl::node_store {
/**
* Derived classes perform scheduled tasks.
@@ -17,4 +17,4 @@ struct Task
performScheduledTask() = 0;
};
} // namespace xrpl::NodeStore
} // namespace xrpl::node_store

View File

@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
#include <memory>
#include <vector>
namespace xrpl::NodeStore {
namespace xrpl::node_store {
// This is only used to pre-allocate the array for
// batch objects and does not affect the amount written.
@@ -36,4 +36,4 @@ enum class Status {
*/
using Batch = std::vector<std::shared_ptr<NodeObject>>;
} // namespace xrpl::NodeStore
} // namespace xrpl::node_store

View File

@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
#include <memory>
#include <mutex>
namespace xrpl::NodeStore {
namespace xrpl::node_store {
/**
* Batch-writing assist logic.
@@ -86,4 +86,4 @@ private:
Batch writeSet_;
};
} // namespace xrpl::NodeStore
} // namespace xrpl::node_store

View File

@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
#include <stdexcept>
#include <utility>
namespace xrpl::NodeStore {
namespace xrpl::node_store {
class DatabaseNodeImp : public Database
{
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ public:
XRPL_ASSERT(
backend_,
"xrpl::NodeStore::DatabaseNodeImp::DatabaseNodeImp : non-null "
"xrpl::node_store::DatabaseNodeImp::DatabaseNodeImp : non-null "
"backend");
}
@@ -138,4 +138,4 @@ private:
}
};
} // namespace xrpl::NodeStore
} // namespace xrpl::node_store

View File

@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
#include <mutex>
#include <string>
namespace xrpl::NodeStore {
namespace xrpl::node_store {
class DatabaseRotatingImp : public DatabaseRotating
{
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ public:
void
rotate(
std::unique_ptr<NodeStore::Backend>&& newBackend,
std::unique_ptr<node_store::Backend>&& newBackend,
std::function<void(std::string const& writableName, std::string const& archiveName)> const&
f) override;
@@ -94,4 +94,4 @@ private:
forEach(std::function<void(std::shared_ptr<NodeObject>)> f) override;
};
} // namespace xrpl::NodeStore
} // namespace xrpl::node_store

View File

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
#include <memory>
namespace xrpl::NodeStore {
namespace xrpl::node_store {
/**
* Parsed key/value blob into NodeObject components.
@@ -49,4 +49,4 @@ private:
int dataBytes_;
};
} // namespace xrpl::NodeStore
} // namespace xrpl::node_store

View File

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
#include <memory>
#include <stdexcept>
namespace xrpl::NodeStore {
namespace xrpl::node_store {
/**
* Convert a NodeObject from in-memory to database format.
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ class EncodedBlob
public:
explicit EncodedBlob(std::shared_ptr<NodeObject> const& obj)
: size_([&obj]() {
XRPL_ASSERT(obj, "xrpl::NodeStore::EncodedBlob::EncodedBlob : non-null input");
XRPL_ASSERT(obj, "xrpl::node_store::EncodedBlob::EncodedBlob : non-null input");
if (!obj)
throw std::runtime_error("EncodedBlob: unseated std::shared_ptr used.");
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ public:
XRPL_ASSERT(
((ptr_ == payload_.data()) && (size_ <= payload_.size())) ||
((ptr_ != payload_.data()) && (size_ > payload_.size())),
"xrpl::NodeStore::EncodedBlob::~EncodedBlob : valid payload "
"xrpl::node_store::EncodedBlob::~EncodedBlob : valid payload "
"pointer");
if (ptr_ != payload_.data())
@@ -114,4 +114,4 @@ public:
}
};
} // namespace xrpl::NodeStore
} // namespace xrpl::node_store

View File

@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
#include <string>
#include <vector>
namespace xrpl::NodeStore {
namespace xrpl::node_store {
class ManagerImp : public Manager
{
@@ -57,4 +57,4 @@ public:
beast::Journal journal) override;
};
} // namespace xrpl::NodeStore
} // namespace xrpl::node_store

View File

@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
#include <cstring>
#include <string>
namespace xrpl::NodeStore {
namespace xrpl::node_store {
template <class BufferFactory>
std::pair<void const*, std::size_t>
@@ -269,7 +269,7 @@ nodeobjectCompress(void const* in, std::size_t inSize, BufferFactory&& bf)
case 1: // lz4
{
std::uint8_t* p = nullptr;
auto const lzr = NodeStore::lz4Compress(in, inSize, [&p, &vn, &bf](std::size_t n) {
auto const lzr = node_store::lz4Compress(in, inSize, [&p, &vn, &bf](std::size_t n) {
p = reinterpret_cast<std::uint8_t*>(bf(vn + n));
return p + vn;
});
@@ -316,4 +316,4 @@ filterInner(void* in, std::size_t inSize)
}
}
} // namespace xrpl::NodeStore
} // namespace xrpl::node_store

View File

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
#include <cstdint>
#include <type_traits>
namespace xrpl::NodeStore {
namespace xrpl::node_store {
// This is a variant of the base128 varint format from
// google protocol buffers:
@@ -123,4 +123,4 @@ write(nudb::detail::ostream& os, std::size_t t)
writeVarint(os.data(sizeVarint(t)), t);
}
} // namespace xrpl::NodeStore
} // namespace xrpl::node_store

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,163 @@
#pragma once
#include <xrpl/beast/utility/PropertyStream.h>
#include <xrpl/peerfinder/detail/Tuning.h>
#include <cstddef>
#include <cstdint>
#include <optional>
#include <string>
#include <string_view>
namespace xrpl::PeerFinder {
struct PeerLimitConfig
{
std::optional<std::size_t> maxPeers;
std::optional<std::size_t> inPeers;
std::optional<std::size_t> outPeers;
};
/**
* PeerFinder configuration settings.
*/
struct Config
{
/**
* The largest number of public peer slots to allow.
* This includes both inbound and outbound, but does not include
* fixed peers.
*/
std::size_t maxPeers{Tuning::kDefaultMaxPeers};
/**
* The number of automatic outbound connections to maintain.
* Outbound connections are only maintained if autoConnect
* is `true`.
*/
std::size_t outPeers = calcOutPeers(); // Note: relies on `maxPeers` being initialized
/**
* The number of automatic inbound connections to maintain.
* Inbound connections are only maintained if wantIncoming
* is `true`.
*/
std::size_t inPeers{0};
/**
* `true` if we want our IP address kept private.
*/
bool peerPrivate = true;
/**
* `true` if we want to accept incoming connections.
*/
bool wantIncoming{true};
/**
* `true` if we want to establish connections automatically
*/
bool autoConnect{true};
/**
* The listening port number.
*/
std::uint16_t listeningPort{0};
/**
* The set of features we advertise.
*/
std::string features;
/**
* Limit how many incoming connections we allow per IP
*/
int ipLimit{0};
/**
* `true` if we want to verify endpoints in TMEndpoints messages
*/
bool verifyEndpoints = true;
//--------------------------------------------------------------------------
/**
* Returns a suitable value for outPeers according to the rules.
*/
[[nodiscard]] std::size_t
calcOutPeers() const;
/**
* Adjusts the values so they follow the business rules.
*/
void
applyTuning();
/**
* Write the configuration into a property stream
*/
void
onWrite(beast::PropertyStream::Map& map) const;
/**
* Make PeerFinder::Config from peer limit and server mode parameters.
*/
static Config
makeConfig(
bool peerPrivate,
bool standalone,
PeerLimitConfig const& limits,
std::uint16_t port,
bool validationPublicKey,
int ipLimit,
bool verifyEndpoints);
/**
* Compares two configurations for equality field by field.
*/
friend bool
operator==(Config const& lhs, Config const& rhs) = default;
};
//------------------------------------------------------------------------------
/**
* Possible results from activating a slot.
*/
enum class Result { InboundDisabled, DuplicatePeer, IpLimitExceeded, Full, Success };
/**
* @brief Converts a `Result` enum value to its string representation.
*
* This function provides a human-readable string for a given `Result` enum,
* which is useful for logging, debugging, or displaying status messages.
*
* @param result The `Result` enum value to convert.
* @return A `std::string_view` representing the enum value. Returns "unknown"
* if the enum value is not explicitly handled.
*
* @note This function returns a `std::string_view` for performance.
* A `std::string` would need to allocate memory on the heap and copy the
* string literal into it every time the function is called.
*/
inline std::string_view
to_string(Result result) noexcept
{
switch (result)
{
case Result::InboundDisabled:
return "inbound disabled";
case Result::DuplicatePeer:
return "peer already connected";
case Result::IpLimitExceeded:
return "ip limit exceeded";
case Result::Full:
return "slots full";
case Result::Success:
return "success";
}
return "unknown";
}
} // namespace xrpl::PeerFinder

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,179 @@
#pragma once
#include <xrpl/beast/net/IPEndpoint.h>
#include <xrpl/beast/utility/PropertyStream.h>
#include <xrpl/peerfinder/Config.h>
#include <xrpl/peerfinder/Slot.h>
#include <xrpl/peerfinder/Types.h>
#include <xrpl/protocol/PublicKey.h>
#include <boost/asio/ip/tcp.hpp>
#include <memory>
#include <string>
#include <string_view>
#include <utility>
#include <vector>
namespace xrpl::PeerFinder {
/**
* Maintains a set of IP addresses used for getting into the network.
*/
class Manager : public beast::PropertyStream::Source
{
protected:
Manager() noexcept;
public:
/**
* Destroy the object.
* Any pending source fetch operations are aborted.
* There may be some listener calls made before the
* destructor returns.
*/
~Manager() override = default;
/**
* Set the configuration for the manager.
* The new settings will be applied asynchronously.
* Thread safety:
* Can be called from any threads at any time.
*/
virtual void
setConfig(Config const& config) = 0;
/**
* Transition to the started state, synchronously.
*/
virtual void
start() = 0;
/**
* Transition to the stopped state, synchronously.
*/
virtual void
stop() = 0;
/**
* Returns the configuration for the manager.
*/
virtual Config
config() = 0;
/**
* Add a peer that should always be connected.
* This is useful for maintaining a private cluster of peers.
* The string is the name as specified in the configuration
* file, along with the set of corresponding IP addresses.
*/
virtual void
addFixedPeer(std::string_view name, std::vector<beast::IP::Endpoint> const& addresses) = 0;
/**
* Add a set of strings as fallback IP::Endpoint sources.
* @param name A label used for diagnostics.
*/
virtual void
addFallbackStrings(std::string const& name, std::vector<std::string> const& strings) = 0;
/**
* Add a URL as a fallback location to obtain IP::Endpoint sources.
* @param name A label used for diagnostics.
*/
/* VFALCO NOTE Unimplemented
virtual void addFallbackURL (std::string const& name,
std::string const& url) = 0;
*/
//--------------------------------------------------------------------------
/**
* Create a new inbound slot with the specified remote endpoint.
* If nullptr is returned, then the slot could not be assigned.
* Usually this is because of a detected self-connection.
*/
virtual std::pair<std::shared_ptr<Slot>, Result>
newInboundSlot(
beast::IP::Endpoint const& localEndpoint,
beast::IP::Endpoint const& remoteEndpoint) = 0;
/**
* Create a new outbound slot with the specified remote endpoint.
* If nullptr is returned, then the slot could not be assigned.
* Usually this is because of a duplicate connection.
*/
virtual std::pair<std::shared_ptr<Slot>, Result>
newOutboundSlot(beast::IP::Endpoint const& remoteEndpoint) = 0;
/**
* Called when mtENDPOINTS is received.
*/
virtual void
onEndpoints(std::shared_ptr<Slot> const& slot, Endpoints const& endpoints) = 0;
/**
* Called when the slot is closed.
* This always happens when the socket is closed, unless the socket
* was canceled.
*/
virtual void
onClosed(std::shared_ptr<Slot> const& slot) = 0;
/**
* Called when an outbound connection is deemed to have failed
*/
virtual void
onFailure(std::shared_ptr<Slot> const& slot) = 0;
/**
* Called when we received redirect IPs from a busy peer.
*/
virtual void
onRedirects(
boost::asio::ip::tcp::endpoint const& remoteAddress,
std::vector<boost::asio::ip::tcp::endpoint> const& eps) = 0;
//--------------------------------------------------------------------------
/**
* Called when an outbound connection attempt succeeds.
* The local endpoint must be valid. If the caller receives an error
* when retrieving the local endpoint from the socket, it should
* proceed as if the connection attempt failed by calling on_closed
* instead of on_connected.
* @return `true` if the connection should be kept
*/
virtual bool
onConnected(std::shared_ptr<Slot> const& slot, beast::IP::Endpoint const& localEndpoint) = 0;
/**
* Request an active slot type.
*/
virtual Result
activate(std::shared_ptr<Slot> const& slot, PublicKey const& key, bool reserved) = 0;
/**
* Returns a set of endpoints suitable for redirection.
*/
virtual std::vector<Endpoint>
redirect(std::shared_ptr<Slot> const& slot) = 0;
/**
* Return a set of addresses we should connect to.
*/
virtual std::vector<beast::IP::Endpoint>
autoconnect() = 0;
virtual std::vector<std::pair<std::shared_ptr<Slot>, std::vector<Endpoint>>>
buildEndpointsForPeers() = 0;
/**
* Perform periodic activity.
* This should be called once per second.
*/
virtual void
oncePerSecond() = 0;
};
} // namespace xrpl::PeerFinder

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
#pragma once
#include <xrpl/beast/clock/abstract_clock.h>
#include <xrpl/beast/net/IPEndpoint.h>
#include <xrpl/peerfinder/detail/Tuning.h>
#include <chrono>
#include <cstdint>
#include <vector>
namespace xrpl::PeerFinder {
using clock_type = beast::AbstractClock<std::chrono::steady_clock>;
/**
* Represents a set of addresses.
*/
using IPAddresses = std::vector<beast::IP::Endpoint>;
//------------------------------------------------------------------------------
/**
* Describes a connectable peer address along with some metadata.
*/
struct Endpoint
{
Endpoint() = default;
Endpoint(beast::IP::Endpoint ep, std::uint32_t hops);
std::uint32_t hops = 0;
beast::IP::Endpoint address;
};
inline bool
operator<(Endpoint const& lhs, Endpoint const& rhs)
{
return lhs.address < rhs.address;
}
/**
* A set of Endpoint used for connecting.
*/
using Endpoints = std::vector<Endpoint>;
} // namespace xrpl::PeerFinder

View File

@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
#pragma once
#include <xrpld/peerfinder/PeerfinderManager.h>
#include <xrpld/peerfinder/detail/Store.h>
#include <xrpl/beast/net/IPEndpoint.h>
#include <xrpl/beast/utility/Journal.h>
#include <xrpl/beast/utility/PropertyStream.h>
#include <xrpl/peerfinder/Types.h>
#include <xrpl/peerfinder/detail/Store.h>
#include <xrpl/peerfinder/detail/Tuning.h>
#include <boost/bimap.hpp>
#include <boost/bimap/multiset_of.hpp>

View File

@@ -1,11 +1,10 @@
#pragma once
#include <xrpld/peerfinder/PeerfinderManager.h>
#include <xrpld/peerfinder/Slot.h>
#include <xrpld/peerfinder/detail/Tuning.h>
#include <xrpl/beast/utility/PropertyStream.h>
#include <xrpl/beast/utility/instrumentation.h>
#include <xrpl/peerfinder/Config.h>
#include <xrpl/peerfinder/Slot.h>
#include <xrpl/peerfinder/detail/Tuning.h>
#include <cstddef>
#include <sstream>

View File

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
#pragma once
#include <xrpld/peerfinder/PeerfinderManager.h>
#include <xrpld/peerfinder/detail/Tuning.h>
#include <xrpl/peerfinder/Types.h>
#include <xrpl/peerfinder/detail/Tuning.h>
#include <algorithm>
#include <chrono>

View File

@@ -1,12 +1,11 @@
#pragma once
#include <xrpld/peerfinder/PeerfinderManager.h>
#include <xrpld/peerfinder/detail/SlotImp.h>
#include <xrpld/peerfinder/detail/Tuning.h>
#include <xrpl/beast/container/aged_set.h>
#include <xrpl/beast/net/IPAddress.h>
#include <xrpl/beast/utility/instrumentation.h>
#include <xrpl/peerfinder/Types.h>
#include <xrpl/peerfinder/detail/SlotImp.h>
#include <xrpl/peerfinder/detail/Tuning.h>
#include <algorithm>
#include <cstddef>

View File

@@ -1,9 +1,5 @@
#pragma once
#include <xrpld/peerfinder/PeerfinderManager.h>
#include <xrpld/peerfinder/detail/Tuning.h>
#include <xrpld/peerfinder/detail/iosformat.h>
#include <xrpl/basics/Log.h>
#include <xrpl/basics/random.h>
#include <xrpl/beast/container/aged_map.h>
@@ -12,6 +8,8 @@
#include <xrpl/beast/utility/PropertyStream.h>
#include <xrpl/beast/utility/instrumentation.h>
#include <xrpl/beast/utility/maybe_const.h>
#include <xrpl/peerfinder/Types.h>
#include <xrpl/peerfinder/detail/Tuning.h>
#include <boost/intrusive/list.hpp>
#include <boost/iterator/transform_iterator.hpp>
@@ -22,6 +20,8 @@
#include <cstddef>
#include <cstdint>
#include <functional>
#include <iomanip>
#include <ios>
#include <iterator>
#include <memory>
#include <sstream>
@@ -411,7 +411,7 @@ Livecache<Allocator>::expire()
}
if (n > 0)
{
JLOG(journal_.debug()) << beast::Leftw(18) << "Livecache expired " << n
JLOG(journal_.debug()) << std::left << std::setw(18) << "Livecache expired " << n
<< ((n > 1) ? " entries" : " entry");
}
}
@@ -434,7 +434,7 @@ Livecache<Allocator>::insert(Endpoint const& ep)
if (result.second)
{
hops.insert(e);
JLOG(journal_.debug()) << beast::Leftw(18) << "Livecache insert " << ep.address
JLOG(journal_.debug()) << std::left << std::setw(18) << "Livecache insert " << ep.address
<< " at hops " << ep.hops;
return;
}
@@ -442,7 +442,7 @@ Livecache<Allocator>::insert(Endpoint const& ep)
{
// Drop duplicates at higher hops
std::size_t const excess(ep.hops - e.endpoint.hops);
JLOG(journal_.trace()) << beast::Leftw(18) << "Livecache drop " << ep.address
JLOG(journal_.trace()) << std::left << std::setw(18) << "Livecache drop " << ep.address
<< " at hops +" << excess;
return;
}
@@ -453,12 +453,12 @@ Livecache<Allocator>::insert(Endpoint const& ep)
if (ep.hops < e.endpoint.hops)
{
hops.reinsert(e, ep.hops);
JLOG(journal_.debug()) << beast::Leftw(18) << "Livecache update " << ep.address
JLOG(journal_.debug()) << std::left << std::setw(18) << "Livecache update " << ep.address
<< " at hops " << ep.hops;
}
else
{
JLOG(journal_.trace()) << beast::Leftw(18) << "Livecache refresh " << ep.address
JLOG(journal_.trace()) << std::left << std::setw(18) << "Livecache refresh " << ep.address
<< " at hops " << ep.hops;
}
}

View File

@@ -1,17 +1,5 @@
#pragma once
#include <xrpld/peerfinder/PeerfinderManager.h>
#include <xrpld/peerfinder/Slot.h>
#include <xrpld/peerfinder/detail/Bootcache.h>
#include <xrpld/peerfinder/detail/Counts.h>
#include <xrpld/peerfinder/detail/Fixed.h>
#include <xrpld/peerfinder/detail/Handouts.h>
#include <xrpld/peerfinder/detail/Livecache.h>
#include <xrpld/peerfinder/detail/SlotImp.h>
#include <xrpld/peerfinder/detail/Source.h>
#include <xrpld/peerfinder/detail/Store.h>
#include <xrpld/peerfinder/detail/iosformat.h>
#include <xrpl/basics/Log.h>
#include <xrpl/basics/contract.h>
#include <xrpl/basics/random.h>
@@ -22,18 +10,34 @@
#include <xrpl/beast/utility/PropertyStream.h>
#include <xrpl/beast/utility/WrappedSink.h>
#include <xrpl/beast/utility/instrumentation.h>
#include <xrpl/peerfinder/Config.h>
#include <xrpl/peerfinder/Slot.h>
#include <xrpl/peerfinder/Types.h>
#include <xrpl/peerfinder/detail/Bootcache.h>
#include <xrpl/peerfinder/detail/Counts.h>
#include <xrpl/peerfinder/detail/Fixed.h>
#include <xrpl/peerfinder/detail/Handouts.h>
#include <xrpl/peerfinder/detail/Livecache.h>
#include <xrpl/peerfinder/detail/SlotImp.h>
#include <xrpl/peerfinder/detail/Source.h>
#include <xrpl/peerfinder/detail/Store.h>
#include <xrpl/protocol/PublicKey.h>
#include <boost/asio/error.hpp>
#include <algorithm>
#include <cstddef>
#include <cstdint>
#include <functional>
#include <iomanip>
#include <ios>
#include <map>
#include <memory>
#include <mutex>
#include <optional>
#include <set>
#include <stdexcept>
#include <string>
#include <string_view>
#include <tuple>
#include <utility>
@@ -197,8 +201,8 @@ public:
if (result.second)
{
JLOG(journal.debug())
<< beast::Leftw(18) << "Logic add fixed '" << name << "' at " << remoteAddress;
JLOG(journal.debug()) << std::left << std::setw(18) << "Logic add fixed '" << name
<< "' at " << remoteAddress;
return;
}
}
@@ -221,7 +225,7 @@ public:
if (iter == slots.end())
{
// The slot disconnected before we finished the check
JLOG(journal.debug()) << beast::Leftw(18) << "Logic tested " << checkedAddress
JLOG(journal.debug()) << std::left << std::setw(18) << "Logic tested " << checkedAddress
<< " but the connection was closed";
return;
}
@@ -255,7 +259,7 @@ public:
beast::IP::Endpoint const& localEndpoint,
beast::IP::Endpoint const& remoteEndpoint)
{
JLOG(journal.debug()) << beast::Leftw(18) << "Logic accept" << remoteEndpoint
JLOG(journal.debug()) << std::left << std::setw(18) << "Logic accept" << remoteEndpoint
<< " on local " << localEndpoint;
std::scoped_lock const _(lock);
@@ -266,7 +270,7 @@ public:
auto const count = connectedAddresses.count(remoteEndpoint.address());
if (count + 1 > config_.ipLimit)
{
JLOG(journal.debug()) << beast::Leftw(18) << "Logic dropping inbound "
JLOG(journal.debug()) << std::left << std::setw(18) << "Logic dropping inbound "
<< remoteEndpoint << " because of ip limits.";
return {SlotImp::ptr(), Result::IpLimitExceeded};
}
@@ -275,8 +279,8 @@ public:
// Check for duplicate connection
if (slots.contains(remoteEndpoint))
{
JLOG(journal.debug()) << beast::Leftw(18) << "Logic dropping " << remoteEndpoint
<< " as duplicate incoming";
JLOG(journal.debug()) << std::left << std::setw(18) << "Logic dropping "
<< remoteEndpoint << " as duplicate incoming";
return {SlotImp::ptr(), Result::DuplicatePeer};
}
@@ -304,15 +308,15 @@ public:
std::pair<SlotImp::ptr, Result>
newOutboundSlot(beast::IP::Endpoint const& remoteEndpoint)
{
JLOG(journal.debug()) << beast::Leftw(18) << "Logic connect " << remoteEndpoint;
JLOG(journal.debug()) << std::left << std::setw(18) << "Logic connect " << remoteEndpoint;
std::scoped_lock const _(lock);
// Check for duplicate connection
if (slots.contains(remoteEndpoint))
{
JLOG(journal.debug()) << beast::Leftw(18) << "Logic dropping " << remoteEndpoint
<< " as duplicate connect";
JLOG(journal.debug()) << std::left << std::setw(18) << "Logic dropping "
<< remoteEndpoint << " as duplicate connect";
return {SlotImp::ptr(), Result::DuplicatePeer};
}
@@ -506,15 +510,15 @@ public:
if (!h.list().empty())
{
JLOG(journal.debug())
<< beast::Leftw(18) << "Logic connect " << h.list().size() << " fixed";
JLOG(journal.debug()) << std::left << std::setw(18) << "Logic connect "
<< h.list().size() << " fixed";
return h.list();
}
if (counts_.attempts() > 0)
{
JLOG(journal.debug())
<< beast::Leftw(18) << "Logic waiting on " << counts_.attempts() << " attempts";
JLOG(journal.debug()) << std::left << std::setw(18) << "Logic waiting on "
<< counts_.attempts() << " attempts";
return none;
}
}
@@ -535,14 +539,14 @@ public:
if (!h.list().empty())
{
JLOG(journal.debug())
<< beast::Leftw(18) << "Logic connect " << h.list().size() << " live "
<< std::left << std::setw(18) << "Logic connect " << h.list().size() << " live "
<< ((h.list().size() > 1) ? "endpoints" : "endpoint");
return h.list();
}
if (counts_.attempts() > 0)
{
JLOG(journal.debug())
<< beast::Leftw(18) << "Logic waiting on " << counts_.attempts() << " attempts";
JLOG(journal.debug()) << std::left << std::setw(18) << "Logic waiting on "
<< counts_.attempts() << " attempts";
return none;
}
}
@@ -568,8 +572,9 @@ public:
if (!h.list().empty())
{
JLOG(journal.debug()) << beast::Leftw(18) << "Logic connect " << h.list().size()
<< " boot " << ((h.list().size() > 1) ? "addresses" : "address");
JLOG(journal.debug()) << std::left << std::setw(18) << "Logic connect "
<< h.list().size() << " boot "
<< ((h.list().size() > 1) ? "addresses" : "address");
return h.list();
}
@@ -689,8 +694,8 @@ public:
// Enforce hop limit
if (ep.hops > Tuning::kMaxHops)
{
JLOG(journal.debug()) << beast::Leftw(18) << "Endpoints drop " << ep.address
<< " for excess hops " << ep.hops;
JLOG(journal.debug()) << std::left << std::setw(18) << "Endpoints drop "
<< ep.address << " for excess hops " << ep.hops;
iter = list.erase(iter);
continue;
}
@@ -706,18 +711,18 @@ public:
}
else
{
JLOG(journal.debug())
<< beast::Leftw(18) << "Endpoints drop " << ep.address << " for extra self";
JLOG(journal.debug()) << std::left << std::setw(18) << "Endpoints drop "
<< ep.address << " for extra self";
iter = list.erase(iter);
continue;
}
}
// Discard invalid addresses
if (config_.verifyEndpoints && !isValidAddress(ep.address))
if (!isValidAddress(ep.address))
{
JLOG(journal.debug())
<< beast::Leftw(18) << "Endpoints drop " << ep.address << " as invalid";
JLOG(journal.debug()) << std::left << std::setw(18) << "Endpoints drop "
<< ep.address << " as invalid";
iter = list.erase(iter);
continue;
}
@@ -727,8 +732,8 @@ public:
return ep.address == other.address;
}))
{
JLOG(journal.debug())
<< beast::Leftw(18) << "Endpoints drop " << ep.address << " as duplicate";
JLOG(journal.debug()) << std::left << std::setw(18) << "Endpoints drop "
<< ep.address << " as duplicate";
iter = list.erase(iter);
continue;
}
@@ -1074,13 +1079,13 @@ public:
if (!results.error)
{
int const count(addBootcacheAddresses(results.addresses));
JLOG(journal.info()) << beast::Leftw(18) << "Logic added " << count << " new "
JLOG(journal.info()) << std::left << std::setw(18) << "Logic added " << count << " new "
<< ((count == 1) ? "address" : "addresses") << " from "
<< source->name();
}
else
{
JLOG(journal.error()) << beast::Leftw(18) << "Logic failed "
JLOG(journal.error()) << std::left << std::setw(18) << "Logic failed "
<< "'" << source->name() << "' fetch, "
<< results.error.message();
}
@@ -1098,8 +1103,6 @@ public:
{
if (isUnspecified(address))
return false;
if (isLoopback(address))
return false;
if (!isPublic(address))
return false;
if (address.port() == 0)
@@ -1221,8 +1224,8 @@ Logic<Checker>::onRedirects(
bootcache.insert(beast::IPAddressConversion::fromAsio(*first));
if (n > 0)
{
JLOG(journal.trace()) << beast::Leftw(18) << "Logic add " << n << " redirect IPs from "
<< remoteAddress;
JLOG(journal.trace()) << std::left << std::setw(18) << "Logic add " << n
<< " redirect IPs from " << remoteAddress;
}
}

View File

@@ -1,10 +1,9 @@
#pragma once
#include <xrpld/peerfinder/PeerfinderManager.h>
#include <xrpld/peerfinder/Slot.h>
#include <xrpl/beast/container/aged_unordered_map.h>
#include <xrpl/beast/net/IPEndpoint.h>
#include <xrpl/peerfinder/Slot.h>
#include <xrpl/peerfinder/Types.h>
#include <xrpl/protocol/PublicKey.h>
#include <atomic>
@@ -172,7 +171,7 @@ private:
std::optional<beast::IP::Endpoint> localEndpoint_;
std::optional<PublicKey> publicKey_;
static constexpr std::int32_t kUnknownPort = -1;
static std::int32_t constexpr kUnknownPort = -1;
std::atomic<std::int32_t> listeningPort_;
public:

View File

@@ -1,8 +1,7 @@
#pragma once
#include <xrpld/peerfinder/PeerfinderManager.h>
#include <xrpl/beast/utility/Journal.h>
#include <xrpl/peerfinder/Types.h>
#include <boost/system/error_code.hpp>

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
#pragma once
#include <xrpld/peerfinder/detail/Source.h>
#include <xrpl/peerfinder/detail/Source.h>
#include <memory>
#include <string>

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
#pragma once
#include <xrpl/beast/insight/Collector.h>
#include <xrpl/beast/utility/Journal.h>
#include <xrpl/peerfinder/PeerfinderManager.h>
#include <xrpl/peerfinder/Types.h>
#include <xrpl/peerfinder/detail/Store.h>
#include <boost/asio/io_context.hpp>
#include <memory>
namespace xrpl::PeerFinder {
/**
* @brief Create a new Manager.
*
* @param ioContext The io_context used to schedule asynchronous work.
* @param clock The clock used for timekeeping.
* @param journal The journal used for logging.
* @param store The persistence backend for the bootstrap cache. The caller
* retains ownership and must keep it alive (and opened) for the lifetime of
* the returned Manager. This lets consumers supply their own Store
* implementation (e.g. the SQLite-backed StoreSqdb in xrpld).
* @param collector The collector used to report metrics.
* @return The newly created Manager.
*/
std::unique_ptr<Manager>
makeManager(
boost::asio::io_context& ioContext,
clock_type& clock,
beast::Journal journal,
Store& store,
beast::insight::Collector::ptr const& collector);
} // namespace xrpl::PeerFinder

View File

@@ -17,46 +17,11 @@
#include <array>
#include <cstdint>
#include <functional>
#include <map>
#include <set>
#include <string>
#include <utility>
namespace xrpl {
/**
* Type-specific prefix for calculating ledger indices.
*
* The identifier for a given object within the ledger is calculated based
* on some object-specific parameters. To ensure that different types of
* objects have different indices, even if they happen to use the same set
* of parameters, we use "tagged hashing" by adding a type-specific prefix.
*
* The name spaces are listed in detail/ledger_name_spaces.macro.
*/
#pragma push_macro("LEDGER_NAME_SPACE")
#undef LEDGER_NAME_SPACE
#pragma push_macro("LEDGER_NAME_SPACE_DEPRECATED")
#undef LEDGER_NAME_SPACE_DEPRECATED
#define LEDGER_NAME_SPACE(name, value) name = (value),
#define LEDGER_NAME_SPACE_DEPRECATED(name, value) name [[deprecated]] = (value),
enum class LedgerNameSpace : std::uint16_t {
#include <xrpl/protocol/detail/ledger_name_spaces.macro>
};
#undef LEDGER_NAME_SPACE_DEPRECATED
#pragma pop_macro("LEDGER_NAME_SPACE_DEPRECATED")
#undef LEDGER_NAME_SPACE
#pragma pop_macro("LEDGER_NAME_SPACE")
/**
* The name->value map of active (non-deprecated) ledger name spaces.
*/
std::map<std::string, std::uint16_t> const&
ledgerNameSpaceMap();
class SeqProxy;
/**
* Keylet computation functions.

View File

@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
// Add new amendments to the top of this list.
// Keep it sorted in reverse chronological order.
XRPL_FIX (Cleanup3_4_0, Supported::Yes, VoteBehavior::DefaultNo)
XRPL_FEATURE(Sponsor, Supported::Yes, VoteBehavior::DefaultNo)
XRPL_FEATURE(BatchV1_1, Supported::Yes, VoteBehavior::DefaultNo)
XRPL_FEATURE(LendingProtocolV1_1, Supported::No, VoteBehavior::DefaultNo)

View File

@@ -1,59 +0,0 @@
#if !defined(LEDGER_NAME_SPACE)
#error "undefined macro: LEDGER_NAME_SPACE"
#endif
#if !defined(LEDGER_NAME_SPACE_DEPRECATED)
#error "undefined macro: LEDGER_NAME_SPACE_DEPRECATED"
#endif
// Active ledger name spaces.
//
// @note These values are part of the protocol and *CANNOT* be arbitrarily
// changed. If they were, on-ledger objects may no longer be able to
// be located or addressed.
//
// Additions to this list are OK, but changing existing entries to
// assign them a different values should never be needed.
//
// Entries that are removed should be moved to the deprecated list
// below to prevent accidental reuse.
LEDGER_NAME_SPACE(Account, 'a')
LEDGER_NAME_SPACE(DirNode, 'd')
LEDGER_NAME_SPACE(TrustLine, 'r')
LEDGER_NAME_SPACE(Offer, 'o')
LEDGER_NAME_SPACE(OwnerDir, 'O')
LEDGER_NAME_SPACE(BookDir, 'B')
LEDGER_NAME_SPACE(SkipList, 's')
LEDGER_NAME_SPACE(Escrow, 'u')
LEDGER_NAME_SPACE(Amendments, 'f')
LEDGER_NAME_SPACE(FeeSettings, 'e')
LEDGER_NAME_SPACE(Ticket, 'T')
LEDGER_NAME_SPACE(SignerList, 'S')
LEDGER_NAME_SPACE(XRPPaymentChannel, 'x')
LEDGER_NAME_SPACE(Check, 'C')
LEDGER_NAME_SPACE(DepositPreauth, 'p')
LEDGER_NAME_SPACE(DepositPreauthCredentials, 'P')
LEDGER_NAME_SPACE(NegativeUnl, 'N')
LEDGER_NAME_SPACE(NftokenOffer, 'q')
LEDGER_NAME_SPACE(NftokenBuyOffers, 'h')
LEDGER_NAME_SPACE(NftokenSellOffers, 'i')
LEDGER_NAME_SPACE(Amm, 'A')
LEDGER_NAME_SPACE(Bridge, 'H')
LEDGER_NAME_SPACE(XchainClaimId, 'Q')
LEDGER_NAME_SPACE(XchainCreateAccountClaimId, 'K')
LEDGER_NAME_SPACE(Did, 'I')
LEDGER_NAME_SPACE(Oracle, 'R')
LEDGER_NAME_SPACE(MPTokenIssuance, '~')
LEDGER_NAME_SPACE(MPToken, 't')
LEDGER_NAME_SPACE(Credential, 'D')
LEDGER_NAME_SPACE(PermissionedDomain, 'm')
LEDGER_NAME_SPACE(Delegate, 'E')
LEDGER_NAME_SPACE(Vault, 'V')
LEDGER_NAME_SPACE(LoanBroker, 'l') // lower-case L
LEDGER_NAME_SPACE(Loan, 'L')
LEDGER_NAME_SPACE(Sponsorship, '>')
// No longer used or supported. Left here to reserve the space to avoid
// accidental reuse, and intentionally not exported to clients.
LEDGER_NAME_SPACE_DEPRECATED(Contract, 'c')
LEDGER_NAME_SPACE_DEPRECATED(Generator, 'g')
LEDGER_NAME_SPACE_DEPRECATED(Nickname, 'n')

Some files were not shown because too many files have changed in this diff Show More