The Phase 4a span table had no consensus.phase.open row at all and listed
only three attributes for consensus.establish. Add the row, the eight
attributes added on this branch, and the two label-valued ones to the
attribute inventory.
Leaves the pre-existing dotted names in the consensus.round row alone; they
predate the underscore convention and are not part of this change.
Move the standalone External Dashboard Parity design spec out of
docs/superpowers/ (which the project guidelines say not to create) and into
an appendix of OpenTelemetryPlan/06-implementation-phases.md, so the phase
plan is self-contained. Repoint the 10 "Source" links in the phase 3/4/7
task lists to the new appendix anchor.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Three entries in Phase4_taskList.md annotated dotted attribute keys
(`xrpl.consensus.round`, `round_id`, `ledger_id`) as "(kept — rule 5)". That
is wrong: rule 5 keeps SPAN NAMES dotted, not attribute keys — the code emits
the underscore form (consensus_round, consensus_round_id, consensus_ledger_id)
per ConsensusSpanNames.h. Remove the false justification; the dotted form in
this task list remains as the illustrative-readability form documented in the
note at the top of the file.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Bring phase-3 forward into phase 4 (consensus tracing). Phase 4 introduces
ConsensusSpanNames.h (and already did the trusted→proposal/validation rename
and underscore-attr conversion in ffc197b914).
Conflict resolution (reviewed by a code-review agent before commit):
- 02-design-decisions.md §2.4 Consensus Attributes: merge-both — kept phase-3's
underscore table form AND folded in phase-4's richer "Phase 4a" attribute set
(round_id, ledger_id, trace_strategy, converge/establish/disputes counts,
agree/disagree counts, threshold_percent, consensus_result, mode_old/new),
each mapped to its authoritative ConsensusSpanNames.h constant. Dropped the
planned-but-unimplemented proposers_agreed/proposers_total (no code constant;
agree_count/disagree_count serve that role).
- SpanGuardFactory.cpp: kept phase-4's explanatory comment about why a libxrpl
test uses literal keys, plus the converted command/rpc_status keys.
Naming check passes (100 keys across 8 *SpanNames.h headers, including consensus).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Bring phase-2 forward into phase 3 (transaction tracing). Phase 3 introduces
TxSpanNames.h, TxQSpanNames.h, and TxApplySpanNames.h.
Conflict resolution:
- TxQ.cpp: kept phase-3's txq_span-based instrumentation (phase-2 had none).
Dropped the orphaned `NumberSO{... fixUniversalNumber}` line — develop's
#5962 (Retire fixUniversalNumber) removed that symbol repo-wide; the
conflict block had carried one stale copy that would not compile.
- 05/08/OpenTelemetryPlan.md: dropped the deleted 04-code-samples / POC_taskList
references (carried from phase-2), kept phase-3's new secure-OTel.md doc rows,
section, and Mermaid node/edge/style. Config code block -> prose; merged the
secure-OTel hardening pointer with the authoritative-config prose.
- Phase3_taskList.md: removed the "dotted keys for readability" note that came
from phase-2 — phase 3 already uses the underscore keys.
Reviewed by code-review agents: telemetry instrumentation intact, naming check
green (47 keys across 7 *SpanNames.h headers), no conflict markers.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The Phase3/4/5 task lists show attribute keys in the older dotted
`xrpl.<domain>.<field>` form because that mirrors how a fully qualified
attribute reads in a Tempo trace view, which keeps the planning prose readable.
Add a note to each clarifying that the implemented keys follow the underscore
convention in CONTRIBUTING.md and that the *SpanNames.h constants (enforced by
the CI naming check) are the single source of truth — so the dotted form here
is illustrative, not the literal key.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Fix quorum attribute to use actual validator quorum instead of proposer
count, add missing ConsensusState::Expired handling in haveConsensus()
span, move ConsensusSpanNames.h to xrpld/consensus/ to resolve
levelization cycle, remove unused constants, enrich proposal receive
span with sequence, and correct stale documentation references.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Update Phase4_taskList.md and 06-implementation-phases.md to reflect
completed implementation of all remaining Phase 4/4a tasks (4.2-4.6,
4a.5, 4a.6, 4a.8). Update exit criteria and summary tables.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Record the close time voting threshold and consensus state on
consensus.update_positions and consensus.check spans:
- xrpl.consensus.close_time_threshold: the avCT_CONSENSUS_PCT (75%)
threshold required for close time agreement
- xrpl.consensus.have_close_time_consensus: whether validators
reached close time consensus in this iteration
These attributes enable dashboards to show how the close time
voting process converges (or stalls) across consensus iterations.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Instrument the consensus subsystem with OpenTelemetry spans covering
the full round lifecycle: round start, establish phase, proposal send,
ledger close, position updates, consensus check, accept, validation
send, and mode changes.
Key design choices adapted from the original Phase 4 implementation
to the new SpanGuard factory pattern introduced in Phase 3:
- Add SpanGuard::hashSpan() for category-gated hash-derived trace IDs
(consensus round spans share trace_id across validators via ledger hash)
- Add SpanGuard::addEvent() overload with key-value attribute pairs
(used for dispute.resolve events during position updates)
- Add ConsensusSpanNames.h with compile-time span name constants
following the colocated *SpanNames.h pattern from Phase 3
- Add consensusTraceStrategy config option ("deterministic"/"attribute")
for cross-node trace correlation strategy selection
- Use SpanGuard::linkedSpan() for follows-from relationships between
consecutive rounds and cross-thread validation spans
- Use SpanGuard::captureContext() for thread-safe context propagation
from consensus thread to jtACCEPT worker thread
Spans produced: consensus.round, consensus.proposal.send,
consensus.ledger_close, consensus.establish, consensus.update_positions,
consensus.check, consensus.accept, consensus.accept.apply,
consensus.validation.send, consensus.mode_change
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Replace references to old XRPL_TRACE_TX/CONSENSUS macros with
SpanGuard::span(TraceCategory, ...) factory calls introduced in Phase 1c.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Introduces task list documents for Phases 2 through 5, with Tempo
references (replacing Jaeger) and Task 2.8 dashboard parity spec.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
