Two panel descriptions pointed at a rollout phase and task number defined
only in a planning folder outside the shipped tree. The note still names
the file and the change it is waiting on, which is the part a reader can
act on.
The catalog tagged every span with a rollout phase number defined only in
a planning folder outside the shipped tree, so the column meant nothing
to a reader of the repository. The span name and source file identify
each entry.
The section labels carried rollout phase numbers that are defined only in
a planning folder outside the shipped tree, so they meant nothing to a
reader of the repository. The descriptive half of each label already
identifies the section.
These comments pointed at a planning folder and at its rollout phase
numbering, neither of which is part of the shipped tree, so the
references would dangle for any reader of the repository. Each comment
now states the fact it was pointing at.
The trace_state comment pointed at a planning document that is not part
of the shipped tree, so the reference would dangle for any reader of the
repository. State the reserved-and-inert fact on its own.
The Transaction Overview panel "Queue Bypass Ratio (Direct Apply vs
Enqueue)" reported a confident 0.50 on every node while the true bypass
rate was zero. The two spans it divided are not disjoint alternatives:
txq.apply_direct is a child of txq.enqueue. TxQ.cpp creates the
apply_direct span as the first statement of tryDirectApply(), ahead of
the account, sequence and fee-level guards, and tryDirectApply() is
called from inside the live enqueue scope. The span therefore counts
attempts, so the denominator direct + enqueue counts each transaction
twice and pins the ratio to one half algebraically.
Measured on a four-node fleet: 6082443 direct against 6082877 enqueue
over the same population, panel output 0.5000170 on three nodes and
0.5000000 on the fourth. Grouping txq.enqueue by txq_status over seven
days returns only "rejected" -- no transaction has ever taken the
direct-apply path.
Remove the panel rather than repoint it. A correct expression using
txq_status as the disjoint discriminator would render permanently
empty on this fleet, which reads no better than a wrong number.
Widen the band partner "TxQ Enqueue Rate by Transaction Type" from 12
to 24 columns so the y=48 band still fills the grid. Every band in all
ten dashboards sums to 24 columns; leaving a half-width hole would be
the only exception. Panel order and every other panel's position,
width and height are unchanged.
The runbook already listed txq.apply_direct as available but not
paneled, so that row becomes accurate. Rows describing the span itself
are untouched -- the span and its metric are unchanged.
Moves off the v2.53 LTS line, which this branch pinned, onto the current
v3 release, and corrects the accompanying comment that named the old line.
Verified against the new image rather than assumed, since this crosses a
major version:
- prometheus.yml passes `promtool check config` under v3.13.2
- all 391 unique dashboard PromQL queries parse under the v3 parser
- all 13 alert-rule expressions parse under the v3 parser
The config uses none of the surfaces v3 changed: no remote_write, no
holt_winters, no offset modifiers.
Bumps the three images this branch pins:
otel-collector-contrib 0.121.0 -> 0.158.0
tempo 2.7.2 -> 2.9.4
grafana 11.5.2 -> 13.1.2
Verified locally against the new images: the collector config passes
`validate` under 0.158.0 and tempo.yaml passes `-config.verify=true` under
2.9.4, both unchanged. The collector's log path uses the generic otlphttp
exporter (otlphttp/loki), not the dedicated loki exporter removed upstream in
v0.147.0, so the pipeline is unaffected by that removal.
Grafana crosses two majors. Operator-visible consequences are handled on the
branches that own the affected files: Grafana 13 enables the renderAuthJWT
feature toggle by default, so the image renderer now requires a matching
renderer_token on both the server and the renderer container.
