mirror of
https://github.com/XRPLF/rippled.git
synced 2026-07-24 15:40:26 +00:00
fix: Add assorted Lending Protocol fixes (#6678)
Co-authored-by: Shawn Xie <35279399+shawnxie999@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Mayukha Vadari
parent
d435893602
commit
b30b4e1d65
@@ -175,18 +175,32 @@ ValidLoanBroker::finalize(
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
auto const& vaultAsset = vault->at(sfAsset);
|
||||
if (after->at(sfCoverAvailable) < accountHolds(
|
||||
view,
|
||||
after->at(sfAccount),
|
||||
vaultAsset,
|
||||
FreezeHandling::fhIGNORE_FREEZE,
|
||||
AuthHandling::ahIGNORE_AUTH,
|
||||
j))
|
||||
auto const pseudoBalance = accountHolds(
|
||||
view,
|
||||
after->at(sfAccount),
|
||||
vaultAsset,
|
||||
FreezeHandling::fhIGNORE_FREEZE,
|
||||
AuthHandling::ahIGNORE_AUTH,
|
||||
j);
|
||||
if (after->at(sfCoverAvailable) < pseudoBalance)
|
||||
{
|
||||
JLOG(j.fatal()) << "Invariant failed: Loan Broker cover available "
|
||||
"is less than pseudo-account asset balance";
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (view.rules().enabled(fixSecurity3_1_3))
|
||||
{
|
||||
// Don't check the balance when LoanBroker is deleted,
|
||||
// sfCoverAvailable is not zeroed
|
||||
if (tx.getTxnType() != ttLOAN_BROKER_DELETE &&
|
||||
after->at(sfCoverAvailable) > pseudoBalance)
|
||||
{
|
||||
JLOG(j.fatal()) << "Invariant failed: Loan Broker cover available is greater "
|
||||
"than pseudo-account asset balance";
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -386,21 +386,29 @@ LoanManage::doApply()
|
||||
return tefBAD_LEDGER; // LCOV_EXCL_LINE
|
||||
auto const vaultAsset = vaultSle->at(sfAsset);
|
||||
|
||||
// Valid flag combinations are checked in preflight. No flags is valid -
|
||||
// just a noop.
|
||||
if (tx.isFlag(tfLoanDefault))
|
||||
return defaultLoan(view, loanSle, brokerSle, vaultSle, vaultAsset, j_);
|
||||
if (tx.isFlag(tfLoanImpair))
|
||||
return impairLoan(view, loanSle, vaultSle, vaultAsset, j_);
|
||||
if (tx.isFlag(tfLoanUnimpair))
|
||||
return unimpairLoan(view, loanSle, vaultSle, vaultAsset, j_);
|
||||
// Noop, as described above.
|
||||
auto const result = [&]() -> TER {
|
||||
// Valid flag combinations are checked in preflight. No flags is valid -
|
||||
// just a noop.
|
||||
if (tx.isFlag(tfLoanDefault))
|
||||
return defaultLoan(view, loanSle, brokerSle, vaultSle, vaultAsset, j_);
|
||||
if (tx.isFlag(tfLoanImpair))
|
||||
return impairLoan(view, loanSle, vaultSle, vaultAsset, j_);
|
||||
if (tx.isFlag(tfLoanUnimpair))
|
||||
return unimpairLoan(view, loanSle, vaultSle, vaultAsset, j_);
|
||||
// Noop, as described above.
|
||||
return tesSUCCESS;
|
||||
}();
|
||||
|
||||
associateAsset(*loanSle, vaultAsset);
|
||||
associateAsset(*brokerSle, vaultAsset);
|
||||
associateAsset(*vaultSle, vaultAsset);
|
||||
// Pre-amendment, associateAsset was only called on the noop (no flags)
|
||||
// path. Post-amendment, we call associateAsset on all successful paths.
|
||||
if (view.rules().enabled(fixSecurity3_1_3) && isTesSuccess(result))
|
||||
{
|
||||
associateAsset(*loanSle, vaultAsset);
|
||||
associateAsset(*brokerSle, vaultAsset);
|
||||
associateAsset(*vaultSle, vaultAsset);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return tesSUCCESS;
|
||||
return result;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
//------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ LoanPay::preclaim(PreclaimContext const& ctx)
|
||||
if (tx.isFlag(tfLoanOverpayment) && !loanSle->isFlag(lsfLoanOverpayment))
|
||||
{
|
||||
JLOG(ctx.j.warn()) << "Requested overpayment on a loan that doesn't allow it";
|
||||
return temINVALID_FLAG;
|
||||
return ctx.view.rules().enabled(fixSecurity3_1_3) ? TER{tecNO_PERMISSION} : temINVALID_FLAG;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
auto const principalOutstanding = loanSle->at(sfPrincipalOutstanding);
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2046,36 +2046,36 @@ class Invariants_test : public beast::unit_test::suite
|
||||
{
|
||||
// Initialize with a placeholder value because there's no default
|
||||
// ctor
|
||||
auto const setupAsset =
|
||||
[&](Account const& alice, Account const& issuer, Env& env) -> PrettyAsset {
|
||||
switch (assetType)
|
||||
{
|
||||
case Asset::IOU: {
|
||||
PrettyAsset const iouAsset = issuer["IOU"];
|
||||
env(trust(alice, iouAsset(1000)));
|
||||
env(pay(issuer, alice, iouAsset(1000)));
|
||||
env.close();
|
||||
return iouAsset;
|
||||
}
|
||||
case Asset::MPT: {
|
||||
MPTTester mptt{env, issuer, mptInitNoFund};
|
||||
mptt.create({.flags = tfMPTCanClawback | tfMPTCanTransfer | tfMPTCanLock});
|
||||
PrettyAsset const mptAsset = mptt.issuanceID();
|
||||
mptt.authorize({.account = alice});
|
||||
env(pay(issuer, alice, mptAsset(1000)));
|
||||
env.close();
|
||||
return mptAsset;
|
||||
}
|
||||
case Asset::XRP:
|
||||
default:
|
||||
return PrettyAsset{xrpIssue(), 1'000'000};
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
Keylet loanBrokerKeylet = keylet::amendments();
|
||||
Preclose const createLoanBroker =
|
||||
[&, this](Account const& alice, Account const& issuer, Env& env) {
|
||||
PrettyAsset const asset = [&]() {
|
||||
switch (assetType)
|
||||
{
|
||||
case Asset::IOU: {
|
||||
PrettyAsset const iouAsset = issuer["IOU"];
|
||||
env(trust(alice, iouAsset(1000)));
|
||||
env(pay(issuer, alice, iouAsset(1000)));
|
||||
env.close();
|
||||
return iouAsset;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
case Asset::MPT: {
|
||||
MPTTester mptt{env, issuer, mptInitNoFund};
|
||||
mptt.create(
|
||||
{.flags = tfMPTCanClawback | tfMPTCanTransfer | tfMPTCanLock});
|
||||
PrettyAsset const mptAsset = mptt.issuanceID();
|
||||
mptt.authorize({.account = alice});
|
||||
env(pay(issuer, alice, mptAsset(1000)));
|
||||
env.close();
|
||||
return mptAsset;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
case Asset::XRP:
|
||||
default:
|
||||
return PrettyAsset{xrpIssue(), 1'000'000};
|
||||
}
|
||||
}();
|
||||
auto const asset = setupAsset(alice, issuer, env);
|
||||
loanBrokerKeylet = this->createLoanBroker(alice, env, asset);
|
||||
return BEAST_EXPECT(env.le(loanBrokerKeylet));
|
||||
};
|
||||
@@ -2249,6 +2249,56 @@ class Invariants_test : public beast::unit_test::suite
|
||||
STTx{ttLOAN_BROKER_SET, [](STObject& tx) {}},
|
||||
{tecINVARIANT_FAILED, tefINVARIANT_FAILED},
|
||||
createLoanBroker);
|
||||
|
||||
// Test: cover available less than pseudo-account asset balance
|
||||
{
|
||||
Keylet brokerKeylet = keylet::amendments();
|
||||
Preclose const createBrokerWithCover =
|
||||
[&, this](Account const& alice, Account const& issuer, Env& env) {
|
||||
auto const asset = setupAsset(alice, issuer, env);
|
||||
brokerKeylet = this->createLoanBroker(alice, env, asset);
|
||||
if (!BEAST_EXPECT(env.le(brokerKeylet)))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
env(loanBroker::coverDeposit(alice, brokerKeylet.key, asset(10)));
|
||||
env.close();
|
||||
return BEAST_EXPECT(env.le(brokerKeylet));
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
doInvariantCheck(
|
||||
{{"Loan Broker cover available is less than pseudo-account asset balance"}},
|
||||
[&](Account const&, Account const&, ApplyContext& ac) {
|
||||
auto sle = ac.view().peek(brokerKeylet);
|
||||
if (!BEAST_EXPECT(sle))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
// Pseudo-account holds 10 units, set cover to 5
|
||||
sle->at(sfCoverAvailable) = Number(5);
|
||||
ac.view().update(sle);
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
},
|
||||
XRPAmount{},
|
||||
STTx{ttLOAN_BROKER_SET, [](STObject& tx) {}},
|
||||
{tecINVARIANT_FAILED, tefINVARIANT_FAILED},
|
||||
createBrokerWithCover);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Test: cover available greater than pseudo-account asset balance
|
||||
// (requires fixSecurity3_1_3)
|
||||
doInvariantCheck(
|
||||
{{"Loan Broker cover available is greater than pseudo-account asset balance"}},
|
||||
[&](Account const&, Account const&, ApplyContext& ac) {
|
||||
auto sle = ac.view().peek(loanBrokerKeylet);
|
||||
if (!BEAST_EXPECT(sle))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
// Pseudo-account has no cover deposited; set cover
|
||||
// higher than any incidental balance
|
||||
sle->at(sfCoverAvailable) = Number(1'000'000);
|
||||
ac.view().update(sle);
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
},
|
||||
XRPAmount{},
|
||||
STTx{ttLOAN_BROKER_SET, [](STObject& tx) {}},
|
||||
{tecINVARIANT_FAILED, tefINVARIANT_FAILED},
|
||||
createLoanBroker);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2071,7 +2071,19 @@ protected:
|
||||
STAmount{broker.asset, state.periodicPayment * Number{15, -1}},
|
||||
tfLoanOverpayment),
|
||||
fee(XRPAmount{baseFee * (Number{15, -1} / loanPaymentsPerFeeIncrement + 1)}),
|
||||
ter(temINVALID_FLAG));
|
||||
ter(tecNO_PERMISSION));
|
||||
|
||||
{
|
||||
env.disableFeature(fixSecurity3_1_3);
|
||||
env(pay(borrower,
|
||||
loanKeylet.key,
|
||||
STAmount{broker.asset, state.periodicPayment * Number{15, -1}},
|
||||
tfLoanOverpayment),
|
||||
fee(XRPAmount{
|
||||
baseFee * (Number{15, -1} / loanPaymentsPerFeeIncrement + 1)}),
|
||||
ter(temINVALID_FLAG));
|
||||
env.enableFeature(fixSecurity3_1_3);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Try to send a payment marked as multiple mutually exclusive
|
||||
// payment types. Do not include `txFlags`, so we don't duplicate
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user