mirror of
https://github.com/XRPLF/xrpl-dev-portal.git
synced 2025-11-27 23:25:51 +00:00
Fix straggling links in rippled API refs
This commit is contained in:
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
|
||||
|
||||
These codes indicate that the transaction failed, but it was applied to a ledger to apply the [transaction cost](transaction-cost.html). They have numerical values in the range 100 to 199. Ripple recommends using the text code, not the numeric value.
|
||||
|
||||
For the most part, transactions with `tec` codes take no action other than to destroy the XRP paid as a [transaction cost](transaction-cost.html), but there are some exceptions. As an exception, a transaction that results in `tecOVERSIZE` still cleans up some [unfunded offers](#lifecycle-of-an-offer). Always look at the [transaction metadata](#understanding-transaction-metadata) to see precisely what a transaction did.
|
||||
For the most part, transactions with `tec` codes take no action other than to destroy the XRP paid as a [transaction cost](transaction-cost.html), but there are some exceptions. As an exception, a transaction that results in `tecOVERSIZE` still cleans up some [unfunded offers](#lifecycle-of-an-offer). Always look at the [transaction metadata](transaction-metadata.html) to see precisely what a transaction did.
|
||||
|
||||
**Caution:** A transaction that provisionally failed with a `tec` code may still succeed or fail with a different code after being reapplied. The result is final when it appears in a validated ledger version. For more information, see [Finality of Results](finality-of-results.html) and [Reliable Transaction Submission](reliable-transaction-submission.html).
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ For the most part, transactions with `tec` codes take no action other than to de
|
||||
| `tecFROZEN` | 137 | The [OfferCreate transaction][] failed because one or both of the assets involved are subject to a [global freeze](freezes.html). |
|
||||
| `tecINSUF_RESERVE_LINE` | 122 | The transaction failed because the sending account does not have enough XRP to create a new trust line. (See: [Reserves](reserves.html)) This error occurs when the counterparty already has a trust line in a non-default state to the sending account for the same currency. (See `tecNO_LINE_INSUF_RESERVE` for the other case.) |
|
||||
| `tecINSUF_RESERVE_OFFER` | 123 | The transaction failed because the sending account does not have enough XRP to create a new Offer. (See: [Reserves](reserves.html)) |
|
||||
| `tecINSUFFICIENT_RESERVE` | 141 | The transaction would increase the [reserve requirement](reserves.html) higher than the sending account's balance. [SignerListSet][], [PaymentChannelCreate][], [PaymentChannelFund][], and [EscrowCreate][] can return this error code. See [SignerLists and Reserves](signerlist.htmls-and-reserves) for more information. |
|
||||
| `tecINSUFFICIENT_RESERVE` | 141 | The transaction would increase the [reserve requirement](reserves.html) higher than the sending account's balance. [SignerListSet][], [PaymentChannelCreate][], [PaymentChannelFund][], and [EscrowCreate][] can return this error code. See [SignerLists and Reserves](signerlist.html#signerlists-and-reserves) for more information. |
|
||||
| `tecINTERNAL` | 144 | Unspecified internal error, with transaction cost applied. This error code should not normally be returned. If you can reproduce this error, please [report an issue](https://github.com/ripple/rippled/issues). |
|
||||
| `tecINVARIANT_FAILED` | 147 | An invariant check failed when trying to execute this transaction. Requires the [EnforceInvariants amendment](known-amendments.html#enforceinvariants). If you can reproduce this error, please [report an issue](https://github.com/ripple/rippled/issues). |
|
||||
| `tecNEED_MASTER_KEY` | 142 | This transaction tried to cause changes that require the master key, such as [disabling the master key or giving up the ability to freeze balances](accountset.html#accountset-flags). [New in: rippled 0.28.0][] |
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user