ARCHIVE/xrpl-dev-portal
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/XRPLF/xrpl-dev-portal.git synced 2025-11-23 05:05:50 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Information Architecture v3 (#1934)

Browse Source 
* Update look up escrows to remove redundant info about lookups via sender/destination. Modify cancel expired escrow for brevity.

* Cancel escrow: fix notes

* Add draft of updated cancel-escrow.js.

* Update intro to escrows.

* Add Escrow Tutorial

* Minor corrections

* Fix headings, add HTML

* Update escrow docs

This commit re-creates f205a92db2 with
some adjustments:

- Omit the accidentally-created dir full of junk
- Fix some typos and one mistake in the Escrow limitations section
- Add a table to the EscrowCreate ref to clarify valid combos of fields.

* Concept info from send-a-time-held-escrow added to escrow.md

* IA: Move "Consensus Network" files

This re-creates some work from the original commit 56fffe0b9f

* Rewrite escrows article (re-created)

This commit re-creates relevant work from the following commits:

9a4a588f2b Update escrow.md context info
e1b017dc83 Remove references to using escrow for interledger payments.

* IA: Move "XRPL servers" files

This re-creates some work from original commit 7611979abf

* IA: move "production readiness" files.

Re-creates work from the following commit:

692438693a  Move tutorials to concepts

* New intro articles

Original commit: 56fffe0b9f

* IA: Reorg account concepts

Re-creates some work from original commit 56fffe0b9f

* IA: reorg transaction concepts

Original commits:
9d4eff9940  WIP - reorg accounts
7611979abf  WIP dir. reorg

* IA: reorg consensus concepts

Original commit: 56fffe0b9f

* IA: Reorg ledger docs

Original commit: 56fffe0b9f

- Rephrased some details of the section

* IA: rename issuing/operational addresses page

Original commit: 56fffe0b9f

* Moving use cases

* Fleshing out Use Cases

Note, the dactyl-config.yml file has not been fully updated.

* Clean up checks conceptual info.

* Remove redundant checks use case section

Original commit: 3c29e9c05e

* IA: move Dex under tokens

Original commit: d08b3ba7d7

* Touch up stablecoin issuer use case (#1856)

* Consolidate stablecoin use case

* Stablecoin issuer: cleanup progress through sending

* Stablecoin issuer: reorg second half

(Note: the dactyl-config.yml is not fully reconciled yet)

* Move rippled and clio tutorials into infrastructure

* Remove link to checks amendement.

* Add note to account_objects.md about commandline interface type field.

* Merge expiration case with lifecycle section.

* Interoperability Use Cases

* Add graphics to intro

* Move escrow use cases to dedicated page.

* Update use case page intros and corresponding concept info.

* Clarify meaning of direct XRP payments.

* Intro link updates

* Payment use cases

* Remove some unnecessary links in transactions section

Original commit: e6fcf4a4dc

* Link cleanup in Tokens section

Original commit: 9588dd5e70

* Touch up 'Configure Peering' section

Original commit: fc8f0990b8

* Clean up links in accounts section

Original commit: 3da5fde7a8

* Add NFT mkt use case

* p2p payments: edits to Wallets

* Clean up payments use cases

* Refine history description

* IA: use case cleanup

* IA: reconcile servers, ledgers sections

* IA: reconcile payment types, tx, tokens

* IA: reconcile accounts section

* IA: reconcile infra

* IA: Fix most broken links

* Full Docs Index: omit from sidebar

* IA: fix up most broken links

* fix Absolute path link to internal content

* Quick updates to Software Ecosystem

* Remove some absolute links to internal resources

* Fix remaining broken links in JA target

* Contributing: tweak formatting

* Tutorials: fix some minor issues

* remove interop use cases

* remove intro image and personal references to dennis

* alphabetize-transaction-nav

* Remove unused files

* Add QS escrow tutorials

* IA: move ledgers, consensus protocol files around

* IA: update nav for new page hierarchy

* reordering of topics under new networks and servers top-nav

* Move "Naming" to "What is XRP?"

* Update dactyl-config.yml

Remove xrp.md from the TOC.

* Update list-xrp-as-an-exchange.md

Update link to what-is-xrp

* Update list-xrp-as-an-exchange.ja.md

Change link to what-is-xrp

* Update currency-formats.md

Change link to what-is-xrp

* Update currency-formats.ja.md

Change link to what-is-xrp

* Update cancel-an-expired-escrow.md

Change link to what-is-xrp

* Update paymentchannelfund.md

Change link to what-is-xml

* Update look-up-escrows.md

Change link to what-is-xrp

* Update tokens.md

change link to what-is-xrp

* Update use-payment-channels.md

* Update send-a-time-held-escrow.md

Update link to what-is-xml

* fix broken links

* Update parallel-networks.md

Change link to what-is-xml

* Update parallel-networks.ja.md

* Update invariant-checking.md

Remove link to xrp.html

* Update invariant-checking.ja.md

Remove link to xrp.html

* Update transaction-cost.md

Change link to what-is-xrp

* Update transaction-cost.ja.md

Change link to what-is-xrp

* Update send-a-conditionally-held-escrow.md

Change link to what-is-xrp

* Update stablecoin-issuer.md

Change link to what-is-xrp

* Update tokens.ja.md

Change link to what-is-xml

* Update autobridging.ja.md

Change link to what-is-xrp

* Update currency-formats.md

update text

* reorganize infrastructure nav section

* Update currency-formats.md

Try removing link altogether.

* Update currency-formats.ja.md

Remove link to what-is-xrp.html

* move commandline usage topic to infrastructure

* initial intro rewrite

* minor update to language

* IA.v3: rm Production Readiness

* Delete xrp.md

* Update xrp link in snippet

* Add redirect for old xrp.html URL

* Small edits to 'What is XRP?' article

* Add missing imgs

* XRP - copy edit per @DennisDawson

* restructure tutorials nav and pages

* fix broken links

* more broken link fixes

* Algo trading: 1st draft

* Algo trading: notes on taxes

* Algo trading: edits per review

* algo trading: fix broken link

* Ledger structure: rewrite for accuracy and clarity

* Update links to removed 'tree format' header

* Ledger Structure: Update diagrams

* Re-gen CSS for ledger structure changes

* Ledger structure: edits per review

* IA.v3: fix broken NFT links introduced by rebase

* Desktop Wallet (py): update little stuff

* Update some capacity/storage details

* contribute doc nav update

* fix image link in create diagram page

* IAv3: Fix 'Ledgers' blurb

* Update full history requirements with details from community members

* add reviewer suggestions

* Edits per @trippled review

* Apply suggestions from peer review

Co-authored-by: oeggert <117319296+oeggert@users.noreply.github.com>

* FH: reword file size limit note per review

* Update software ecosystem

* updates per review

* Minor tweaks to graphics

* fixTypos

* Update content/concepts/introduction/software-ecosystem.md

Co-authored-by: Amarantha Kulkarni <amarantha-k@users.noreply.github.com>

* Update content/concepts/introduction/software-ecosystem.md

Co-authored-by: Amarantha Kulkarni <amarantha-k@users.noreply.github.com>

* [JA] update AccountDelete cost

* custom transactors doc

* add doc to dactyl config

* [JA] fix NonFungibleTokensV1_1 amendment status

* [JA] update NFTokenOffer page

* Remove old, unused XRP article (#2039)

* add reviewer suggestions

* Add tooling to check for file/nav consistency

- From the repo top, run tool/check_file_consistency.py to look for
  Markdown files that exist in the "content/" directory but aren't used
  in the documentation.
- New "enforce_filenames" filter prints a warning to console when
  building, if a file's path and filename don't match expectations
  based on its place in the nav and top heading.

* File consistency checker: correctly handle filenames starting in _

* Remove unused old 'get started' and associated code

* Create Resources section & reorg some files

- Rename some files/folders based on their place in the nav
- Move a bunch of non-documentation stuff, and docs on contributing code
  and/or docs to the new "Resources" section.
- Known issue: nav spills into a second row on page widths between
  993px-1110px. To be fixed in a later CSS update, maybe along with
  making the Resources dropdown multi-column.

* Fix #2078 code tab bug

CSS not built yet, to reduce merge conflicts. Won't have any effect
until that happens.

* fix Transaction JSON

* [JA] translate contributing contents

* fix contributing-to-documentation parent

* fix contribute-code blurb

* Top nav: add cols for Resources, fix broken links

* CSS: fix top nav overflows

* Fix broken link from redirect not in JA target

* Top nav: add Infra to article types

* Update contrib info & rename intro file

* [ja] Update link to suggested first page to translate

* [ja] fix contribute docs organization

* Run private network with docker tutorial (#2065)

* [NO-ISSUE] Run private network with docker tutorial

Adds a tutorial page in the Infrastructure section on how to run a private XRPL network with Docker.

Please let me know if you think this is a useful page to include for developers, whether the steps are clear or not, and if you have suggestions on what can be added to it.

* Add minor link fixes and Japanese target

* Apply suggestions from code review

Co-authored-by: Amarantha Kulkarni <amarantha-k@users.noreply.github.com>

* Add link to ripple-docker-testnet setup scripts in See Also section

* Update repo URL

---------

Co-authored-by: Amarantha Kulkarni <amarantha-k@users.noreply.github.com>

* add intro gfx (#2036)

* add intro gfx

* Move graphic up

* Update some graphics with their revised versions

* Add updated version of the custodial vs non-custodial graphic

---------

Co-authored-by: Amarantha Kulkarni <amarantha-k@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Amarantha Kulkarni <akulkarni@ripple.com>

* Update to reflect current UNL publishers

* [ja] update contributing

Co-authored-by: tequ <git@tequ.dev>

* Incorporate feedback on "What is XRP" page. (#2099)

* Add trademark info for XRP

* Revert section to previous state

* Fix broken link (#2101)

---------

Co-authored-by: Oliver Eggert <oeggert@ripple.com>
Co-authored-by: ddawson <dennis.s.dawson@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Maria Shodunke <mshodunke@ripple.com>
Co-authored-by: tequ <git@tequ.dev>
Co-authored-by: oeggert <117319296+oeggert@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Amarantha Kulkarni <amarantha-k@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: develoQ <develoQ.jp@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Maria Shodunke <maria-robobug@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Amarantha Kulkarni <akulkarni@ripple.com>
This commit is contained in:
Rome Reginelli
2023-09-01 12:40:18 -07:00
committed by GitHub
parent 31a068e6ae
commit b51bcb4ea3
445 changed files with 9020 additions and 4411 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
content/references/protocol-reference/transactions/transaction-results/tec-codes.ja.md
View File

@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ labels:
| `tecINVARIANT_FAILED` | 147 | このトランザクションを実行しようとしたところ、不変性チェックが失敗しました。[EnforceInvariants Amendment][]が必要です。このエラーを再現できる場合は、[問題を報告](https://github.com/ripple/rippled/issues)してください。 |
| `tecKILLED` | 150 | [OfferCreateトランザクション][]がtfFillOrKillフラグを指定しましたが、トランザクションを確定できなかったため、このトランザクションは取り消されました。_（[fix1578 Amendment][]が必要です。）_ |
| `tecNEED_MASTER_KEY` | 142 | このトランザクションはマスターキーを必要とする変更（[マスターキーの無効化または残高凍結能力の放棄](accountset.html#accountsetのフラグ)など）を試みました。[新規: rippled 0.28.0][] |
| `tecNO_ALTERNATIVE_KEY` | 130 | トランザクションが唯一の[トランザクション承認](transaction-basics.html#トランザクションの承認)メソッドを削除しようとしました。これは、レギュラーキーを削除する[SetRegularKeyトランザクション][]、SignerListを削除する[SignerListSetトランザクション][]、またはマスターキーを無効にする[AccountSetトランザクション][]である可能性があります。（`rippled` 0.30.0より前のバージョンでは、このトランザクションは`tecMASTER_DISABLED`と呼ばれていました。） |
| `tecNO_ALTERNATIVE_KEY` | 130 | トランザクションが唯一の[トランザクション承認](transactions.html#トランザクションの承認)メソッドを削除しようとしました。これは、レギュラーキーを削除する[SetRegularKeyトランザクション][]、SignerListを削除する[SignerListSetトランザクション][]、またはマスターキーを無効にする[AccountSetトランザクション][]である可能性があります。（`rippled` 0.30.0より前のバージョンでは、このトランザクションは`tecMASTER_DISABLED`と呼ばれていました。） |
| `tecNO_AUTH` | 134 | トランザクションはトラストラインの残高を、`lsfRequireAuth`フラグが有効になっているアカウントに追加する必要がありましたが、そのトラストラインが承認されていなかったため、失敗しました。トラストラインが存在しない場合は、代わりに`tecNO_LINE`が発生します。 |
| `tecNO_DST` | 124 | トランザクションの受信側のアカウントが存在しません。これには、PaymentトランザクションタイプやTrustSetトランザクションタイプがあります。（XRPを十分に受信した場合に作成される可能性があります。） |
| `tecNO_DST_INSUF_XRP` | 125 | トランザクションの受信側のアカウントが存在しません。トランザクションは、アカウントの作成に十分なXRPを送金していません。 |
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ labels:
| `tecNO_LINE_INSUF_RESERVE` | 126 | 送信側アカウントに、新しいトラストラインを作成するのに十分なXRPがないため、トランザクションが失敗しました。（[準備金](reserves.html)を参照）このエラーは、取引相手がこのアカウントに対する同一通貨のトラストラインを持っていない場合に発生します。（その他のケースについては`tecINSUF_RESERVE_LINE`を参照してください。） |
| `tecNO_LINE_REDUNDANT` | 127 | トランザクションはトラストラインをデフォルト状態に設定しようと試みましたが、トラストラインが存在していなかったため、失敗しました。 |
| `tecNO_PERMISSION` | 139 | 送信者にはこの操作を実行する権限がありません。たとえば[EscrowFinishトランザクション][]が`FinishAfter`時刻に達する前に保留中の支払をリリースしようとしたか、送信者が所有していないChannelで誰かが[PaymentChannelFund][]を使用しようとしたか、または[Payment][]が「DepositAuth」フラグが有効になっているアカウントに資金の送金を試みました。 |
| `tecNO_REGULAR_KEY` | 131 | [AccountSetトランザクション][]がマスターキーを無効にしようとしましたが、アカウントにはマスターキー以外で[トランザクションを承認する](transaction-basics.html#トランザクションの承認)方法がありません。[マルチシグ](multi-signing.html)が有効な場合、このコードは廃止予定であり、代わりに`tecNO_ALTERNATIVE_KEY`が使用されます。 |
| `tecNO_REGULAR_KEY` | 131 | [AccountSetトランザクション][]がマスターキーを無効にしようとしましたが、アカウントにはマスターキー以外で[トランザクションを承認する](transactions.html#トランザクションの承認)方法がありません。[マルチシグ](multi-signing.html)が有効な場合、このコードは廃止予定であり、代わりに`tecNO_ALTERNATIVE_KEY`が使用されます。 |
| `tecNO_TARGET` | 138 | トランザクションが参照するEscrowレジャーオブジェクトまたはPayChannelレジャーオブジェクトが存在していません。これらのオブジェクトは、これまでに存在したことがないか、すでに削除されています。（たとえば、別の[EscrowFinishトランザクション][]で保留中の支払がすでに実行されている場合などです。）あるいは、支払先アカウントで`asfDisallowXRP`が設定されているため、このアカウントは[PaymentChannelCreate][]トランザクションまたは[EscrowCreate][]トランザクションの宛先に指定できません。 |
| `tecOVERSIZE` | 145 | サーバーがこのトランザクションの適用時に大量のメタデータを作成したため、このトランザクションを処理できませんでした。[新規: rippled 0.29.0-hf1][] |
| `tecOWNERS` | 132 | トランザクションでは、トランザクションを送信するアカウントの「所有者カウント」はゼロ以外である必要があります。このためトランザクションを正常に完了できません。たとえば、トラストラインや使用可能なオファーがあるアカウントでは、[`lsfRequireAuth`](accountset.html#accountsetのフラグ)フラグを有効にできません。 |

12
content/references/protocol-reference/transactions/transaction-results/tec-codes.md
View File

@@ -20,11 +20,11 @@ Transactions with `tec` codes destroy the XRP paid as a [transaction cost](trans
| `tecCRYPTOCONDITION_ERROR` | 146 | This [EscrowCreate][] or [EscrowFinish][] transaction contained a malformed or mismatched crypto-condition. |
| `tecDIR_FULL` | 121 | The transaction tried to add an object (such as a trust line, Check, Escrow, or Payment Channel) to an account's owner directory, but that account cannot own any more objects in the ledger. |
| `tecDUPLICATE` | 149 | The transaction tried to create an object (such as a [DepositPreauth][] authorization) that already exists. |
| `tecDST_TAG_NEEDED` | 143 | The [Payment transaction][] omitted a [destination tag](source-and-destination-tags.html), but the destination account has the `lsfRequireDestTag` flag enabled. [New in: rippled 0.28.0][] |
| `tecDST_TAG_NEEDED` | 143 | The [Payment transaction][] omitted a [destination tag](source-and-destination-tags.html), but the destination account has the `lsfRequireDestTag` flag enabled. |
| `tecEXPIRED` | 148 | The transaction tried to create an object (such as an Offer or a Check) whose provided Expiration time has already passed. |
| `tecFAILED_PROCESSING` | 105 | An unspecified error occurred when processing the transaction. |
| `tecFROZEN` | 137 | The [OfferCreate transaction][] failed because one or both of the assets involved are subject to a [global freeze](freezes.html). |
| `tecHAS_OBLIGATIONS` | 151 | The [AccountDelete transaction][] failed because the account to be deleted owns objects that cannot be deleted. See [Deletion of Accounts](accounts.html#deletion-of-accounts) for details. |
| `tecHAS_OBLIGATIONS` | 151 | The [AccountDelete transaction][] failed because the account to be deleted owns objects that cannot be deleted. See [Deleting Accounts](deleting-accounts.html) for details. |
| `tecINSUF_RESERVE_LINE` | 122 | The transaction failed because the sending account does not have enough XRP to create a new trust line. (See: [Reserves](reserves.html)) This error occurs when the counterparty already has a trust line in a non-default state to the sending account for the same currency. (See `tecNO_LINE_INSUF_RESERVE` for the other case.) |
| `tecINSUF_RESERVE_OFFER` | 123 | The transaction failed because the sending account does not have enough XRP to create a new Offer. (See: [Reserves](reserves.html)) |
| `tecINSUFF_FEE` | 136 | The transaction failed because the sending account does not have enough XRP to pay the [transaction cost](transaction-cost.html) that it specified. (In this case, the transaction processing destroys all of the sender's XRP even though that amount is lower than the specified transaction cost.) This result only occurs if the account's balance decreases _after_ this transaction has been distributed to enough of the network to be included in a consensus set. Otherwise, the transaction fails with [`terINSUF_FEE_B`](ter-codes.html) before being distributed. |
@@ -35,10 +35,10 @@ Transactions with `tec` codes destroy the XRP paid as a [transaction cost](trans
| `tecINVARIANT_FAILED` | 147 | An invariant check failed when trying to execute this transaction. Added by the [EnforceInvariants amendment][]. If you can reproduce this error, please [report an issue](https://github.com/ripple/rippled/issues). |
| `tecKILLED` | 150 | The [OfferCreate transaction][] specified the `tfFillOrKill` flag and could not be filled, so it was killed. _(Added by the [fix1578 amendment][].)_ |
| `tecMAX_SEQUENCE_REACHED` | 153 | A sequence number field is already at its maximum. This includes the `MintedNFTokens` field. _(Added by the [NonFungibleTokensV1_1 amendment][].)_ |
| `tecNEED_MASTER_KEY` | 142 | This transaction tried to cause changes that require the master key, such as [disabling the master key or giving up the ability to freeze balances](accountset.html#accountset-flags). [New in: rippled 0.28.0][] |
| `tecNEED_MASTER_KEY` | 142 | This transaction tried to cause changes that require the master key, such as [disabling the master key or giving up the ability to freeze balances](accountset.html#accountset-flags). |
| `tecNFTOKEN_BUY_SELL_MISMATCH` | 155 | The [NFTokenAcceptOffer transaction][] attempted to match incompatible offers to buy and sell a non-fungible token. _(Added by the [NonFungibleTokensV1_1 amendment][].)_ |
| `tecNFTOKEN_OFFER_TYPE_MISMATCH` | 156 | One or more of the offers specified in the transaction was not the right type of offer. (For example, a buy offer was specified in the `NFTokenSellOffer` field.) _(Added by the [NonFungibleTokensV1_1 amendment][].)_ |
| `tecNO_ALTERNATIVE_KEY` | 130 | The transaction tried to remove the only available method of [authorizing transactions](transaction-basics.html#authorizing-transactions). This could be a [SetRegularKey transaction][] to remove the regular key, a [SignerListSet transaction][] to delete a SignerList, or an [AccountSet transaction][] to disable the master key. (Prior to `rippled` 0.30.0, this was called `tecMASTER_DISABLED`.) |
| `tecNO_ALTERNATIVE_KEY` | 130 | The transaction tried to remove the only available method of [authorizing transactions](transactions.html#authorizing-transactions). This could be a [SetRegularKey transaction][] to remove the regular key, a [SignerListSet transaction][] to delete a SignerList, or an [AccountSet transaction][] to disable the master key. (Prior to `rippled` 0.30.0, this was called `tecMASTER_DISABLED`.) |
| `tecNO_AUTH` | 134 | The transaction failed because it needs to add a balance on a trust line to an account with the `lsfRequireAuth` flag enabled, and that trust line has not been authorized. If the trust line does not exist at all, `tecNO_LINE` occurs instead. |
| `tecNO_DST` | 124 | The account on the receiving end of the transaction does not exist. This includes Payment and TrustSet transaction types. (It could be created if it received enough XRP.) |
| `tecNO_DST_INSUF_XRP` | 125 | The account on the receiving end of the transaction does not exist, and the transaction is not sending enough XRP to create it. |
@@ -48,11 +48,11 @@ Transactions with `tec` codes destroy the XRP paid as a [transaction cost](trans
| `tecNO_LINE_INSUF_RESERVE` | 126 | The transaction failed because the sending account does not have enough XRP to create a new trust line. (See: [Reserves](reserves.html)) This error occurs when the counterparty does not have a trust line to this account for the same currency. (See `tecINSUF_RESERVE_LINE` for the other case.) |
| `tecNO_LINE_REDUNDANT` | 127 | The transaction failed because it tried to set a trust line to its default state, but the trust line did not exist. |
| `tecNO_PERMISSION` | 139 | The sender does not have permission to do this operation. For example, the [EscrowFinish transaction][] tried to release a held payment before its `FinishAfter` time, someone tried to use [PaymentChannelFund][] on a channel the sender does not own, or a [Payment][] tried to deliver funds to an account with the "DepositAuth" flag enabled. |
| `tecNO_REGULAR_KEY` | 131 | The [AccountSet transaction][] tried to disable the master key, but the account does not have another way to [authorize transactions](transaction-basics.html#authorizing-transactions). If [multi-signing](multi-signing.html) is enabled, this code is deprecated and `tecNO_ALTERNATIVE_KEY` is used instead. |
| `tecNO_REGULAR_KEY` | 131 | The [AccountSet transaction][] tried to disable the master key, but the account does not have another way to [authorize transactions](transactions.html#authorizing-transactions). If [multi-signing](multi-signing.html) is enabled, this code is deprecated and `tecNO_ALTERNATIVE_KEY` is used instead. |
| `tecNO_SUITABLE_NFTOKEN_PAGE` | 154 | The transaction tried to mint or acquire a non-fungible token but the account receiving the `NFToken` does not have a directory page that can hold it. This situation is rare. _(Added by the [NonFungibleTokensV1_1 amendment][].)_ |
| `tecNO_TARGET` | 138 | The transaction referenced an Escrow or PayChannel ledger object that doesn't exist, either because it never existed or it has already been deleted. (For example, another [EscrowFinish transaction][] has already executed the held payment.) Alternatively, the destination account has `asfDisallowXRP` set so it cannot be the destination of this [PaymentChannelCreate][] or [EscrowCreate][] transaction. |
| `tecOBJECT_NOT_FOUND` | 160 | One of the objects specified by this transaction did not exist in the ledger. _(Added by the [NonFungibleTokensV1_1 amendment][].)_ |
| `tecOVERSIZE` | 145 | This transaction could not be processed, because the server created an excessively large amount of [metadata](transaction-metadata.html) when it tried to apply the transaction. [New in: rippled 0.29.0-hf1][] |
| `tecOVERSIZE` | 145 | This transaction could not be processed, because the server created an excessively large amount of [metadata](transaction-metadata.html) when it tried to apply the transaction. |
| `tecOWNERS` | 132 | The transaction cannot succeed because the sender already owns objects in the ledger. For example, an account cannot enable the [`lsfRequireAuth`](accountset.html#accountset-flags) flag if it has any trust lines or available offers. |
| `tecPATH_DRY` | 128 | The transaction failed because the provided [paths](paths.html) did not have enough liquidity to send anything at all. This could mean that the source and destination accounts are not linked by [trust lines](trust-lines-and-issuing.html). |
| `tecPATH_PARTIAL` | 101 | The transaction failed because the provided [paths](paths.html) did not have enough liquidity to send the full amount. |