diff --git a/docs/concepts/networks-and-servers/peer-protocol.md b/docs/concepts/networks-and-servers/peer-protocol.md index 1dfc6b9e78..57786226df 100644 --- a/docs/concepts/networks-and-servers/peer-protocol.md +++ b/docs/concepts/networks-and-servers/peer-protocol.md @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ The pros and cons of each configuration are as follows:
Simplest configuration, with a low maintenance burden.
Creates the opportunity for a lot of direct peer connections. Having more direct peers comes with several benefits. Your server can fetch history from multiple peers in parallel, both when syncing and when backfilling history. Since not all peers maintain full history, having access to more peers can also provide access to a wider range of historical data.
Creates the opportunity for a lot of direct peer connections. Having more direct peers comes with several benefits. Your server can fetch history from multiple peers in parallel, both when syncing and when backfilling history. Since not all peers maintain full history, having access to more peers can also provide access to a wider range of historical data.
Lowers the possibility of disconnecting from the network because your server can replace disconnected peers with new ones.
Most secure and reliable configuration when implemented effectively.
As reliable and as redundant as you make it.
Can optimize the private server's performance with clustering.
Can optimize the private server's performance with clustering.
Enables you to create as many direct peer connections as you want. Your private server can fetch history from multiple peers in parallel. Since you run the peers, you also control how much ledger history each peer keeps.