ARCHIVE/xrpl-dev-portal
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/XRPLF/xrpl-dev-portal.git synced 2025-11-20 19:55:54 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

tx error codes: edits per @wilsonianb review & re-spaced tables

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
mDuo13
2017-04-21 16:20:52 -07:00
parent 41ec32e5d0
commit a03f135856
2 changed files with 34 additions and 34 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

8
content/reference-transaction-format.md
View File

@@ -1414,7 +1414,7 @@ The code `tesSUCCESS` is the only code that indicates a transaction succeeded. T
These codes indicate that the transaction failed, but it was applied to a ledger to apply the [transaction cost](concept-transaction-cost.html). They have numerical values in the range 100 to 199. The exact codes sometimes appear in ledger data, so they do not change, but we recommend not relying on the numeric value regardless. These codes indicate that the transaction failed, but it was applied to a ledger to apply the [transaction cost](concept-transaction-cost.html). They have numerical values in the range 100 to 199. The exact codes sometimes appear in ledger data, so they do not change, but we recommend not relying on the numeric value regardless.
| Code | Value | Explanation | | Code | Value | Explanation |
|:----------------------------|:------|:---------------------------------------| |:---------------------------|:------|:----------------------------------------|
| `tecCLAIM` | 100 | Unspecified failure, with transaction cost destroyed. | | `tecCLAIM` | 100 | Unspecified failure, with transaction cost destroyed. |
| `tecDIR_FULL` | 121 | The address sending the transaction cannot own any more objects in the ledger. | | `tecDIR_FULL` | 121 | The address sending the transaction cannot own any more objects in the ledger. |
| `tecDST_TAG_NEEDED` | 143 | The [Payment](#payment) transaction omitted a destination tag, but the destination account has the `lsfRequireDestTag` flag enabled. [New in: rippled 0.28.0][] | | `tecDST_TAG_NEEDED` | 143 | The [Payment](#payment) transaction omitted a destination tag, but the destination account has the `lsfRequireDestTag` flag enabled. [New in: rippled 0.28.0][] |
@@ -1422,7 +1422,7 @@ These codes indicate that the transaction failed, but it was applied to a ledger
| `tecFROZEN` | 137 | The [OfferCreate transaction][] failed because one or both of the assets involved are subject to a [global freeze](concept-freeze.html). | | `tecFROZEN` | 137 | The [OfferCreate transaction][] failed because one or both of the assets involved are subject to a [global freeze](concept-freeze.html). |
| `tecINSUF_RESERVE_LINE` | 122 | The transaction failed because the sending account does not have enough XRP to create a new trust line. (See: [Reserves](concept-reserves.html)) This error occurs when the counterparty already has a trust line in a non-default state to the sending account for the same currency. (See `tecNO_LINE_INSUF_RESERVE` for the other case.) | | `tecINSUF_RESERVE_LINE` | 122 | The transaction failed because the sending account does not have enough XRP to create a new trust line. (See: [Reserves](concept-reserves.html)) This error occurs when the counterparty already has a trust line in a non-default state to the sending account for the same currency. (See `tecNO_LINE_INSUF_RESERVE` for the other case.) |
| `tecINSUF_RESERVE_OFFER` | 123 | The transaction failed because the sending account does not have enough XRP to create a new Offer. (See: [Reserves](concept-reserves.html)) | | `tecINSUF_RESERVE_OFFER` | 123 | The transaction failed because the sending account does not have enough XRP to create a new Offer. (See: [Reserves](concept-reserves.html)) |
| `tecINSUFFICIENT_RESERVE` | 141 | The [SignerListSet][] or other transaction would increase the [reserve requirement](concept-reserves.html) higher than the sending account's balance. See [SignerLists and Reserves](reference-ledger-format.html#signerlists-and-reserves) for more information. | | `tecINSUFFICIENT_RESERVE` | 141 | The transaction would increase the [reserve requirement](concept-reserves.html) higher than the sending account's balance. [SignerListSet][], [PaymentChannelCreate][], [PaymentChannelFund][], and [EscrowCreate][] can return this error code or `tecUNFUNDED`. See [SignerLists and Reserves](reference-ledger-format.html#signerlists-and-reserves) for more information. |
| `tecINTERNAL` | 144 | Unspecified internal error, with transaction cost applied. This error code should not normally be returned. | | `tecINTERNAL` | 144 | Unspecified internal error, with transaction cost applied. This error code should not normally be returned. |
| `tecNEED_MASTER_KEY` | 142 | This transaction tried to cause changes that require the master key, such as [disabling the master key or giving up the ability to freeze balances](#accountset-flags). [New in: rippled 0.28.0][] | | `tecNEED_MASTER_KEY` | 142 | This transaction tried to cause changes that require the master key, such as [disabling the master key or giving up the ability to freeze balances](#accountset-flags). [New in: rippled 0.28.0][] |
| `tecNO_ALTERNATIVE_KEY` | 130 | The transaction tried to remove the only available method of [authorizing transactions](#authorizing-transactions). This could be a [SetRegularKey transaction][] to remove the regular key, a [SignerListSet transaction][] to delete a SignerList, or an [AccountSet transaction][] to disable the master key. (Prior to `rippled` 0.30.0, this was called `tecMASTER_DISABLED`.) | | `tecNO_ALTERNATIVE_KEY` | 130 | The transaction tried to remove the only available method of [authorizing transactions](#authorizing-transactions). This could be a [SetRegularKey transaction][] to remove the regular key, a [SignerListSet transaction][] to delete a SignerList, or an [AccountSet transaction][] to disable the master key. (Prior to `rippled` 0.30.0, this was called `tecMASTER_DISABLED`.) |
@@ -1436,12 +1436,12 @@ These codes indicate that the transaction failed, but it was applied to a ledger
| `tecNO_LINE_REDUNDANT` | 127 | The transaction failed because it tried to set a trust line to its default state, but the trust line did not exist. | | `tecNO_LINE_REDUNDANT` | 127 | The transaction failed because it tried to set a trust line to its default state, but the trust line did not exist. |
| `tecNO_PERMISSION` | 139 | The sender does not have permission to perform this operation. For example, the [EscrowFinish transaction][] tried to release a held payment before its `FinishAfter` time, or someone tried to use [PaymentChannelFund][] on a channel the sender does not own. | | `tecNO_PERMISSION` | 139 | The sender does not have permission to perform this operation. For example, the [EscrowFinish transaction][] tried to release a held payment before its `FinishAfter` time, or someone tried to use [PaymentChannelFund][] on a channel the sender does not own. |
| `tecNO_REGULAR_KEY` | 131 | The [AccountSet transaction][] tried to disable the master key, but the account does not have another way to [authorize transactions](#authorizing-transactions). If [multi-signing](#multi-signing) is enabled, this code is deprecated and `tecNO_ALTERNATIVE_KEY` is used instead. | | `tecNO_REGULAR_KEY` | 131 | The [AccountSet transaction][] tried to disable the master key, but the account does not have another way to [authorize transactions](#authorizing-transactions). If [multi-signing](#multi-signing) is enabled, this code is deprecated and `tecNO_ALTERNATIVE_KEY` is used instead. |
| `tecNO_TARGET` | 138 | The destination account does not exist, or it does exist but has `asfDisallowXRP` set so it cannot be the destination of this [PaymentChannelCreate][] or [EscrowCreate][] transaction. | | `tecNO_TARGET` | 138 | The transaction referenced an Escrow or PayChannel ledger node that doesn't exist, either because it never existed or it has already been deleted. (For example, another [EscrowFinish transaction][] has already executed the held payment.) Alternatively, the destination account has `asfDisallowXRP` set so it cannot be the destination of this [PaymentChannelCreate][] or [EscrowCreate][] transaction. |
| `tecOVERSIZE` | 145 | This transaction could not be processed, because the server created an excessively large amount of metadata when it tried to apply the transaction. [New in: rippled 0.29.0-hf1][] | | `tecOVERSIZE` | 145 | This transaction could not be processed, because the server created an excessively large amount of metadata when it tried to apply the transaction. [New in: rippled 0.29.0-hf1][] |
| `tecOWNERS` | 132 | The transaction requires that account sending it has a nonzero "owners count", so the transaction cannot succeed. For example, an account cannot enable the [`lsfRequireAuth`](#accountset-flags) flag if it has any trust lines or available offers. | | `tecOWNERS` | 132 | The transaction requires that account sending it has a nonzero "owners count", so the transaction cannot succeed. For example, an account cannot enable the [`lsfRequireAuth`](#accountset-flags) flag if it has any trust lines or available offers. |
| `tecPATH_DRY` | 128 | The transaction failed because the provided paths did not have enough liquidity to send anything at all. This could mean that the source and destination accounts are not linked by trust lines. | | `tecPATH_DRY` | 128 | The transaction failed because the provided paths did not have enough liquidity to send anything at all. This could mean that the source and destination accounts are not linked by trust lines. |
| `tecPATH_PARTIAL` | 101 | The transaction failed because the provided paths did not have enough liquidity to send the full amount. | | `tecPATH_PARTIAL` | 101 | The transaction failed because the provided paths did not have enough liquidity to send the full amount. |
| `tecUNFUNDED` | 129 | The transaction failed because the account does not hold enough XRP to satisfy the additional reserve necessary to execute this transaction. (See: [Reserves](concept-reserves.html)) | | `tecUNFUNDED` | 129 | The transaction failed because the account does not hold enough XRP to pay the amount in the transaction _and_ satisfy the additional reserve necessary to execute this transaction. (See: [Reserves](concept-reserves.html)) |
| `tecUNFUNDED_ADD` | 102 | **DEPRECATED.** | | `tecUNFUNDED_ADD` | 102 | **DEPRECATED.** |
| `tecUNFUNDED_PAYMENT` | 104 | The transaction failed because the sending account is trying to send more XRP than it holds, not counting the reserve. (See: [Reserves](concept-reserves.html)) | | `tecUNFUNDED_PAYMENT` | 104 | The transaction failed because the sending account is trying to send more XRP than it holds, not counting the reserve. (See: [Reserves](concept-reserves.html)) |
| `tecUNFUNDED_OFFER` | 103 | The [OfferCreate transaction][] failed because the account creating the offer does not have any of the `TakerGets` currency. | | `tecUNFUNDED_OFFER` | 103 | The [OfferCreate transaction][] failed because the account creating the offer does not have any of the `TakerGets` currency. |

6
reference-transaction-format.html
View File

@@ -2514,7 +2514,7 @@
<tr> <tr>
<td align="left"><code>tecINSUFFICIENT_RESERVE</code></td> <td align="left"><code>tecINSUFFICIENT_RESERVE</code></td>
<td align="left">141</td> <td align="left">141</td>
<td align="left">The <a href="#signerlistset">SignerListSet</a> or other transaction would increase the <a href="concept-reserves.html">reserve requirement</a> higher than the sending account's balance. See <a href="reference-ledger-format.html#signerlists-and-reserves">SignerLists and Reserves</a> for more information.</td> <td align="left">The transaction would increase the <a href="concept-reserves.html">reserve requirement</a> higher than the sending account's balance. <a href="#signerlistset">SignerListSet</a>, <a href="#paymentchannelcreate">PaymentChannelCreate</a>, <a href="#paymentchannelfund">PaymentChannelFund</a>, and <a href="#escrowcreate">EscrowCreate</a> can return this error code or <code>tecUNFUNDED</code>. See <a href="reference-ledger-format.html#signerlists-and-reserves">SignerLists and Reserves</a> for more information.</td>
</tr> </tr>
<tr> <tr>
<td align="left"><code>tecINTERNAL</code></td> <td align="left"><code>tecINTERNAL</code></td>
@@ -2584,7 +2584,7 @@
<tr> <tr>
<td align="left"><code>tecNO_TARGET</code></td> <td align="left"><code>tecNO_TARGET</code></td>
<td align="left">138</td> <td align="left">138</td>
<td align="left">The destination account does not exist, or it does exist but has <code>asfDisallowXRP</code> set so it cannot be the destination of this <a href="#paymentchannelcreate">PaymentChannelCreate</a> or <a href="#escrowcreate">EscrowCreate</a> transaction.</td> <td align="left">The transaction referenced an Escrow or PayChannel ledger node that doesn't exist, either because it never existed or it has already been deleted. (For example, another <a href="#escrowfinish">EscrowFinish transaction</a> has already executed the held payment.) Alternatively, the destination account has <code>asfDisallowXRP</code> set so it cannot be the destination of this <a href="#paymentchannelcreate">PaymentChannelCreate</a> or <a href="#escrowcreate">EscrowCreate</a> transaction.</td>
</tr> </tr>
<tr> <tr>
<td align="left"><code>tecOVERSIZE</code></td> <td align="left"><code>tecOVERSIZE</code></td>
@@ -2609,7 +2609,7 @@
<tr> <tr>
<td align="left"><code>tecUNFUNDED</code></td> <td align="left"><code>tecUNFUNDED</code></td>
<td align="left">129</td> <td align="left">129</td>
<td align="left">The transaction failed because the account does not hold enough XRP to satisfy the additional reserve necessary to execute this transaction. (See: <a href="concept-reserves.html">Reserves</a>)</td> <td align="left">The transaction failed because the account does not hold enough XRP to pay the amount in the transaction <em>and</em> satisfy the additional reserve necessary to execute this transaction. (See: <a href="concept-reserves.html">Reserves</a>)</td>
</tr> </tr>
<tr> <tr>
<td align="left"><code>tecUNFUNDED_ADD</code></td> <td align="left"><code>tecUNFUNDED_ADD</code></td>