ARCHIVE/xrpl-dev-portal
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/XRPLF/xrpl-dev-portal.git synced 2025-11-28 07:35:50 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Update NFT status

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
mDuo13
2022-10-31 14:52:40 -07:00
parent a9e92f4d03
commit 4addf5996b
47 changed files with 110 additions and 116 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

16
content/references/protocol-reference/transactions/transaction-results/tec-codes.md
View File

@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ For the most part, transactions with `tec` codes take no action other than to de
| Code | Value | Explanation |
|:---------------------------|:------|:----------------------------------------|
| `tecCANT_ACCEPT_OWN_NFTOKEN_OFFER` | 157 | The transaction tried to accept an offer that was placed by the same account to buy or sell a [non-fungible token](non-fungible-tokens.html). _(Added by the [NonFungibleTokensV1 amendment][]. :not_enabled:)_ |
| `tecCANT_ACCEPT_OWN_NFTOKEN_OFFER` | 157 | The transaction tried to accept an offer that was placed by the same account to buy or sell a [non-fungible token](non-fungible-tokens.html). _(Added by the [NonFungibleTokensV1_1 amendment][].)_ |
| `tecCLAIM` | 100 | Unspecified failure, with transaction cost destroyed. |
| `tecCRYPTOCONDITION_ERROR` | 146 | This [EscrowCreate][] or [EscrowFinish][] transaction contained a malformed or mismatched crypto-condition. |
| `tecDIR_FULL` | 121 | The transaction tried to add an object (such as a trust line, Check, Escrow, or Payment Channel) to an account's owner directory, but that account cannot own any more objects in the ledger. |
@@ -28,16 +28,16 @@ For the most part, transactions with `tec` codes take no action other than to de
| `tecINSUF_RESERVE_LINE` | 122 | The transaction failed because the sending account does not have enough XRP to create a new trust line. (See: [Reserves](reserves.html)) This error occurs when the counterparty already has a trust line in a non-default state to the sending account for the same currency. (See `tecNO_LINE_INSUF_RESERVE` for the other case.) |
| `tecINSUF_RESERVE_OFFER` | 123 | The transaction failed because the sending account does not have enough XRP to create a new Offer. (See: [Reserves](reserves.html)) |
| `tecINSUFF_FEE` | 136 | The transaction failed because the sending account does not have enough XRP to pay the [transaction cost](transaction-cost.html) that it specified. (In this case, the transaction processing destroys all of the sender's XRP even though that amount is lower than the specified transaction cost.) This result only occurs if the account's balance decreases _after_ this transaction has been distributed to enough of the network to be included in a consensus set. Otherwise, the transaction fails with [`terINSUF_FEE_B`](ter-codes.html) before being distributed. |
| `tecINSUFFICIENT_FUNDS` | 158 | One of the accounts involved does not hold enough of a necessary asset. _(Added by the [NonFungibleTokensV1 amendment][]. :not_enabled:)_ |
| `tecINSUFFICIENT_PAYMENT` | 161 | The amount specified is not enough to pay all fees involved in the transaction. For example, when trading a non-fungible token, the buy amount may not be enough to pay both the broker fee and the sell amount. _(Added by the [NonFungibleTokensV1 amendment][]. :not_enabled:)_ |
| `tecINSUFFICIENT_FUNDS` | 158 | One of the accounts involved does not hold enough of a necessary asset. _(Added by the [NonFungibleTokensV1_1 amendment][].)_ |
| `tecINSUFFICIENT_PAYMENT` | 161 | The amount specified is not enough to pay all fees involved in the transaction. For example, when trading a non-fungible token, the buy amount may not be enough to pay both the broker fee and the sell amount. _(Added by the [NonFungibleTokensV1_1 amendment][].)_ |
| `tecINSUFFICIENT_RESERVE` | 141 | The transaction would increase the [reserve requirement](reserves.html) higher than the sending account's balance. [SignerListSet][], [PaymentChannelCreate][], [PaymentChannelFund][], and [EscrowCreate][] can return this error code. See [Signer Lists and Reserves](signerlist.html#signer-lists-and-reserves) for more information. |
| `tecINTERNAL` | 144 | Unspecified internal error, with transaction cost applied. This error code should not normally be returned. If you can reproduce this error, please [report an issue](https://github.com/ripple/rippled/issues). |
| `tecINVARIANT_FAILED` | 147 | An invariant check failed when trying to execute this transaction. Added by the [EnforceInvariants amendment][]. If you can reproduce this error, please [report an issue](https://github.com/ripple/rippled/issues). |
| `tecKILLED` | 150 | The [OfferCreate transaction][] specified the `tfFillOrKill` flag and could not be filled, so it was killed. _(Added by the [fix1578 amendment][].)_ |
| `tecMAX_SEQUENCE_REACHED` | 153 | A sequence number field is already at its maximum. This includes the `MintedNFTokens` field. _(Added by the [NonFungibleTokensV1 amendment][]. :not_enabled:)_ |
| `tecMAX_SEQUENCE_REACHED` | 153 | A sequence number field is already at its maximum. This includes the `MintedNFTokens` field. _(Added by the [NonFungibleTokensV1_1 amendment][].)_ |
| `tecNEED_MASTER_KEY` | 142 | This transaction tried to cause changes that require the master key, such as [disabling the master key or giving up the ability to freeze balances](accountset.html#accountset-flags). [New in: rippled 0.28.0][] |
| `tecNFTOKEN_BUY_SELL_MISMATCH` | 155 | The [NFTokenAcceptOffer transaction][] :not_enabled: attempted to match incompatible offers to buy and sell a non-fungible token. _(Added by the [NonFungibleTokensV1 amendment][]. :not_enabled:)_ |
| `tecNFTOKEN_OFFER_TYPE_MISMATCH` | 156 | One or more of the offers specified in the transaction was not the right type of offer. (For example, a buy offer was specified in the `NFTokenSellOffer` field.) _(Added by the [NonFungibleTokensV1 amendment][]. :not_enabled:)_ |
| `tecNFTOKEN_BUY_SELL_MISMATCH` | 155 | The [NFTokenAcceptOffer transaction][] attempted to match incompatible offers to buy and sell a non-fungible token. _(Added by the [NonFungibleTokensV1_1 amendment][].)_ |
| `tecNFTOKEN_OFFER_TYPE_MISMATCH` | 156 | One or more of the offers specified in the transaction was not the right type of offer. (For example, a buy offer was specified in the `NFTokenSellOffer` field.) _(Added by the [NonFungibleTokensV1_1 amendment][].)_ |
| `tecNO_ALTERNATIVE_KEY` | 130 | The transaction tried to remove the only available method of [authorizing transactions](transaction-basics.html#authorizing-transactions). This could be a [SetRegularKey transaction][] to remove the regular key, a [SignerListSet transaction][] to delete a SignerList, or an [AccountSet transaction][] to disable the master key. (Prior to `rippled` 0.30.0, this was called `tecMASTER_DISABLED`.) |
| `tecNO_AUTH` | 134 | The transaction failed because it needs to add a balance on a trust line to an account with the `lsfRequireAuth` flag enabled, and that trust line has not been authorized. If the trust line does not exist at all, `tecNO_LINE` occurs instead. |
| `tecNO_DST` | 124 | The account on the receiving end of the transaction does not exist. This includes Payment and TrustSet transaction types. (It could be created if it received enough XRP.) |
@@ -49,9 +49,9 @@ For the most part, transactions with `tec` codes take no action other than to de
| `tecNO_LINE_REDUNDANT` | 127 | The transaction failed because it tried to set a trust line to its default state, but the trust line did not exist. |
| `tecNO_PERMISSION` | 139 | The sender does not have permission to do this operation. For example, the [EscrowFinish transaction][] tried to release a held payment before its `FinishAfter` time, someone tried to use [PaymentChannelFund][] on a channel the sender does not own, or a [Payment][] tried to deliver funds to an account with the "DepositAuth" flag enabled. |
| `tecNO_REGULAR_KEY` | 131 | The [AccountSet transaction][] tried to disable the master key, but the account does not have another way to [authorize transactions](transaction-basics.html#authorizing-transactions). If [multi-signing](multi-signing.html) is enabled, this code is deprecated and `tecNO_ALTERNATIVE_KEY` is used instead. |
| `tecNO_SUITABLE_NFTOKEN_PAGE` | 154 | The transaction tried to mint or acquire a non-fungible token but the account receiving the `NFToken` does not have a directory page that can hold it. This situation is rare. _(Added by the [NonFungibleTokensV1 amendment][]. :not_enabled:)_ |
| `tecNO_SUITABLE_NFTOKEN_PAGE` | 154 | The transaction tried to mint or acquire a non-fungible token but the account receiving the `NFToken` does not have a directory page that can hold it. This situation is rare. _(Added by the [NonFungibleTokensV1_1 amendment][].)_ |
| `tecNO_TARGET` | 138 | The transaction referenced an Escrow or PayChannel ledger object that doesn't exist, either because it never existed or it has already been deleted. (For example, another [EscrowFinish transaction][] has already executed the held payment.) Alternatively, the destination account has `asfDisallowXRP` set so it cannot be the destination of this [PaymentChannelCreate][] or [EscrowCreate][] transaction. |
| `tecOBJECT_NOT_FOUND` | 160 | One of the objects specified by this transaction did not exist in the ledger. _(Added by the [NonFungibleTokensV1 amendment][]. :not_enabled:)_ |
| `tecOBJECT_NOT_FOUND` | 160 | One of the objects specified by this transaction did not exist in the ledger. _(Added by the [NonFungibleTokensV1_1 amendment][].)_ |
| `tecOVERSIZE` | 145 | This transaction could not be processed, because the server created an excessively large amount of [metadata](transaction-metadata.html) when it tried to apply the transaction. [New in: rippled 0.29.0-hf1][] |
| `tecOWNERS` | 132 | The transaction requires that account sending it has a nonzero "owners count", so the transaction cannot succeed. For example, an account cannot enable the [`lsfRequireAuth`](accountset.html#accountset-flags) flag if it has any trust lines or available offers. |
| `tecPATH_DRY` | 128 | The transaction failed because the provided [paths](paths.html) did not have enough liquidity to send anything at all. This could mean that the source and destination accounts are not linked by [trust lines](trust-lines-and-issuing.html). |

2
content/references/protocol-reference/transactions/transaction-results/tef-codes.md
View File

@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ These codes indicate that the transaction failed and was not included in a ledge
| `tefINVARIANT_FAILED` | An invariant check failed when trying to claim the [transaction cost](transaction-cost.html). Added by the [EnforceInvariants amendment][]. If you can reproduce this error, please [report an issue](https://github.com/ripple/rippled/issues). |
| `tefMASTER_DISABLED` | The transaction was signed with the account's master key, but the account has the `lsfDisableMaster` field set. |
| `tefMAX_LEDGER` | The transaction included a [`LastLedgerSequence`](reliable-transaction-submission.html#lastledgersequence) parameter, but the current ledger's sequence number is already higher than the specified value. |
| `tefNFTOKEN_IS_NOT_TRANSFERABLE` | The transaction attempted to send a [non-fungible token](non-fungible-tokens.html) to another account, but the `NFToken` has the `lsfTransferable` flag disabled and the transfer would not be to or from the issuer. _(Added by the [NonFungibleTokensV1 amendment][]. :not_enabled:)_ |
| `tefNFTOKEN_IS_NOT_TRANSFERABLE` | The transaction attempted to send a [non-fungible token](non-fungible-tokens.html) to another account, but the `NFToken` has the `lsfTransferable` flag disabled and the transfer would not be to or from the issuer. _(Added by the [NonFungibleTokensV1_1 amendment][].)_ |
| `tefNO_AUTH_REQUIRED` | The [TrustSet transaction][] tried to mark a trust line as authorized, but the `lsfRequireAuth` flag is not enabled for the corresponding account, so authorization is not necessary. |
| `tefNO_TICKET` | The transaction attempted to use a [Ticket](tickets.html), but the specified `TicketSequence` number does not exist in the ledger, and cannot be created in the future because it is earlier than the sender's current sequence number. |
| `tefNOT_MULTI_SIGNING` | The transaction was [multi-signed](multi-signing.html), but the sending account has no SignerList defined. |

2
content/references/protocol-reference/transactions/transaction-results/tem-codes.md
View File

@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ These codes indicate that the transaction was malformed, and cannot succeed acco
| `temBAD_FEE` | The transaction improperly specified its `Fee` value, for example by listing a non-XRP currency or some negative amount of XRP. |
| `temBAD_ISSUER` | The transaction improperly specified the `issuer` field of some currency included in the request. |
| `temBAD_LIMIT` | The [TrustSet transaction][] improperly specified the `LimitAmount` value of a trust line. |
| `temBAD_NFTOKEN_TRANSFER_FEE` | The [NFTokenMint transaction][] improperly specified the `TransferFee` field of the transaction. _(Added by the [NonFungibleTokensV1 amendment][]. :not_enabled:)_ |
| `temBAD_NFTOKEN_TRANSFER_FEE` | The [NFTokenMint transaction][] improperly specified the `TransferFee` field of the transaction. _(Added by the [NonFungibleTokensV1_1 amendment][].)_ |
| `temBAD_OFFER` | The [OfferCreate transaction][] specifies an invalid offer, such as offering to trade XRP for itself, or offering a negative amount. |
| `temBAD_PATH` | The [Payment transaction][] specifies one or more [Paths](paths.html) improperly, for example including an issuer for XRP, or specifying an account differently. |
| `temBAD_PATH_LOOP` | One of the [Paths](paths.html) in the [Payment transaction][] was flagged as a loop, so it cannot be processed in a bounded amount of time. |