ARCHIVE/xrpl-dev-portal
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/XRPLF/xrpl-dev-portal.git synced 2025-11-20 11:45:50 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

tecINVARIANT_FAILED: add missing value column

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
mDuo13
2017-06-15 14:31:07 -07:00
parent 5a81943cc8
commit 4859014908
2 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
content/reference-transaction-format.md
View File

@@ -1424,7 +1424,7 @@ These codes indicate that the transaction failed, but it was applied to a ledger
| `tecINSUF_RESERVE_OFFER` | 123 | The transaction failed because the sending account does not have enough XRP to create a new Offer. (See: [Reserves](concept-reserves.html)) |
| `tecINSUFFICIENT_RESERVE` | 141 | The transaction would increase the [reserve requirement](concept-reserves.html) higher than the sending account's balance. [SignerListSet][], [PaymentChannelCreate][], [PaymentChannelFund][], and [EscrowCreate][] can return this error code. See [SignerLists and Reserves](reference-ledger-format.html#signerlists-and-reserves) for more information. |
| `tecINTERNAL` | 144 | Unspecified internal error, with transaction cost applied. This error code should not normally be returned. If you can reproduce this error, please [report an issue](https://github.com/ripple/rippled/issues). |
| `tecINVARIANT_FAILED` | An invariant check failed when trying to execute this transaction. Requires the [EnforceInvariants amendment](concept-amendments.html#enforceinvariants). If you can reproduce this error, please [report an issue](https://github.com/ripple/rippled/issues). |
| `tecINVARIANT_FAILED` | 147 | An invariant check failed when trying to execute this transaction. Requires the [EnforceInvariants amendment](concept-amendments.html#enforceinvariants). If you can reproduce this error, please [report an issue](https://github.com/ripple/rippled/issues). |
| `tecNEED_MASTER_KEY` | 142 | This transaction tried to cause changes that require the master key, such as [disabling the master key or giving up the ability to freeze balances](#accountset-flags). [New in: rippled 0.28.0][] |
| `tecNO_ALTERNATIVE_KEY` | 130 | The transaction tried to remove the only available method of [authorizing transactions](#authorizing-transactions). This could be a [SetRegularKey transaction][] to remove the regular key, a [SignerListSet transaction][] to delete a SignerList, or an [AccountSet transaction][] to disable the master key. (Prior to `rippled` 0.30.0, this was called `tecMASTER_DISABLED`.) |
| `tecNO_AUTH` | 134 | The transaction failed because it needs to add a balance on a trust line to an account with the `lsfRequireAuth` flag enabled, and that trust line has not been authorized. If the trust line does not exist at all, `tecNO_LINE` occurs instead. |

2
reference-transaction-format.html
View File

@@ -2536,8 +2536,8 @@
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><code>tecINVARIANT_FAILED</code></td>
<td align="left">147</td>
<td align="left">An invariant check failed when trying to execute this transaction. Requires the <a href="concept-amendments.html#enforceinvariants">EnforceInvariants amendment</a>. If you can reproduce this error, please <a href="https://github.com/ripple/rippled/issues">report an issue</a>.</td>
<td align="left"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><code>tecNEED_MASTER_KEY</code></td>