* fix ns delete owner count
* add a new success code and refactor success checks, limit ns delete operations to 256 entries per txn
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Holland <richard.holland@starstone.co.nz>
Before this change any non-zero Sequence field was handled as
a non-ticketed transaction, even if a TicketSequence was
present. We learned that this could lead to user confusion.
So the rules are tightened up.
Now if any transaction contains both a non-zero Sequence
field and a TicketSequence field then that transaction
returns a temSEQ_AND_TICKET error code.
The (deprecated) "sign" and "submit" RPC commands are tuned
up so they auto-insert a Sequence field of zero if they see
a TicketSequence in the transaction.
No amendment is needed because this change is going into
the first release that supports the TicketBatch amendment.
The previous error description was focused on keys that are too long,
but this error can occur if the key is too short or does not contain
the correct prefix.
Tickets are a mechanism to allow for the "out-of-order" execution of
transactions on the XRP Ledger.
This commit, if merged, reworks the existing support for tickets and
introduces support for 'ticket batching', completing the feature set
needed for tickets.
The code is gated under the newly-introduced `TicketBatch` amendment
and the `Tickets` amendment, which is not presently active on the
network, is being removed.
The specification for this change can be found at:
https://github.com/xrp-community/standards-drafts/issues/16
The tecUNFUNDED code is actively used when attempting to create payment
channels; the messages incorrectly list it as deprecated.
Meanwhile, the tecUNFUNDED_ADD code actually is an unused legacy code,
dating back to when there was a WalletAdd transactor. The terLAST and
terFUNDS_SPENT codes are also unused legacy codes.
Engine result messages are not part of the binary format and are
documented as subject to change without notice, so this should not
require an amendment nor a new API version.
Align error code table for human readability.
The XRP Ledger utilizes an account model. Unlike systems based on a UTXO
model, XRP Ledger accounts are first-class objects. This design choice
allows the XRP Ledger to offer rich functionality, including the ability
to own objects (offers, escrows, checks, signer lists) as well as other
advanced features, such as key rotation and configurable multi-signing
without needing to change a destination address.
The trade-off is that accounts must be stored on ledger. The XRP Ledger
applies reserve requirements, in XRP, to protect the shared global ledger
from growing excessively large as the result of spam or malicious usage.
Prior to this commit, accounts had been permanent objects; once created,
they could never be deleted.
This commit introduces a new amendment "DeletableAccounts" which, if
enabled, will allow account objects to be deleted by executing the new
"AccountDelete" transaction. Any funds remaining in the account will
be transferred to an account specified in the deletion transaction.
The amendment changes the mechanics of account creation; previously
a new account would have an initial sequence number of 1. Accounts
created after the amendment will have an initial sequence number that
is equal to the ledger in which the account was created.
Accounts can only be deleted if they are not associated with any
obligations (like RippleStates, Escrows, or PayChannels) and if the
current ledger sequence number exceeds the account's sequence number
by at least 256 so that, if recreated, the account can be protected
from transaction replay.
The XRP Ledger allows an account to authorize a secondary key pair,
called a regular key pair, to sign future transactions, while keeping
the master key pair offline.
The regular key pair can be changed as often as desired, without
requiring other changes on the account.
If merged, this commit corrects a minor technical flaw which would
allow an account holder to specify the master key as the account's
new regular key.
The change is controlled by the `fixMasterKeyAsRegularKey` amendment
which, if enabled, will:
1. Prevent specifying an account's master key as the account's
regular key.
2. Prevent the "Disable Master Key" flag from incorrectly affecting
regular keys.
As described in #2314, when an offer executed with `Fill or Kill`
semantics, the server would return `tesSUCCESS` even if the order
couldn't be filled and was aborted. This would require additional
processing of metadata by users to determine the effects of the
transaction.
This commit introduces the `fix1578` amendment which, if enabled,
will cause the server to return the new `tecKILLED` error code
instead of `tesSUCCESS` for `Fill or Kill` orders that could not
be filled.
Additionally, the `fix1578` amendment will prevent the setting of
the `No Ripple` flag on trust lines with negative balance; trying
to set the flag on such a trust line will fail with the new error
code `tecNEGATIVE_BALANCE`.
The lsfDepositAuth flag limits the AccountIDs that can deposit into
the account that has the flag set. The original design only
allowed deposits to complete if the account with the flag set also
signed the transaction that caused the deposit.
The DepositPreauth ledger type allows an account with the
lsfDepositAuth flag set to preauthorize additional accounts.
This preauthorization allows them to sign deposits as well. An
account can add DepositPreauth objects to the ledger (and remove
them as well) using the DepositPreauth transaction.
The six different ranges of TER codes are broken up into six
different enumerations. A template class allows subsets of
these enumerations to be aggregated. This technique allows
verification at compile time that no TEC codes are returned
before the signature is checked.
Conversion between TER instance and integer is provided by
named functions. This makes accidental conversion almost
impossible and makes type abuse easier to spot in the code
base.
Introduce a new ledger type: ltCHECK
Introduce three new transactions that operate on checks:
- "CheckCreate" which adds the check entry to the ledger. The
check is a promise from the source of the check that the
destination of the check may cash the check and receive up to
the SendMax specified on the check. The check may have an
expiration, after which the check may no longer be cashed.
- "CheckCash" is a request by the destination of the check to
transfer a requested amount of funds, up to the check's SendMax,
from the source to the destination. The destination may receive
less than the SendMax due to transfer fees.
When cashing a check, the destination specifies the smallest
amount of funds that will be acceptable. If the transfer
completes and delivers the requested amount, then the check is
considered cashed and removed from the ledger. If enough funds
cannot be delivered, then the transaction fails and the check
remains in the ledger.
Attempting to cash the check after its expiration will fail.
- "CheckCancel" removes the check from the ledger without
transferring funds. Either the check's source or destination
can cancel the check at any time. After a check has expired,
any account can cancel the check.
Facilities related to checks are on the "Checks" amendment.
* If the transaction can't be queued, recover to the open ledger once,
and drop it on the next attempt.
* New result codes for transactions that can not queue.
* Add minimum queue size.
* Remove the obsolete and incorrect SF_RETRY flag.
* fix#2215
Sets a maximum TransferRate value of 100%. Squashes any
requested TransferRate over the limit to the max value.
This change requires an amendment ("fix1201") in rippled.
Adds test functionality for enabling an amendment mid-test.
Additionally, adds tests utilizing varying transfer rates both
with and without the amendment enabled.
Add new functionality to enforce one or more sanity checks (invariants)
on transactions. Add tests for each new invariant check. Allow
for easily adding additional invariant checks in the future.
Also Resolves
-------------
- RIPD-1426
- RIPD-1427
- RIPD-1428
- RIPD-1429
- RIPD-1430
- RIPD-1431
- RIPD-1432
Release Notes
-------------
Creates a new ammendment named "EnforceInvariants" which must be
enabled in order for these new checks to run on each transaction.
Add an amendment to allow gateways to set a "tick size"
for assets they issue. There are no changes unless the
amendment is enabled (since the tick size option cannot
be set).
With the amendment enabled:
AccountSet transactions may set a "TickSize" parameter.
Legal values are 0 and 3-15 inclusive. Zero removes the
setting. 3-15 allow that many decimal digits of precision
in the pricing of offers for assets issued by this account.
For asset pairs with XRP, the tick size imposed, if any,
is the tick size of the issuer of the non-XRP asset. For
asset pairs without XRP, the tick size imposed, if any,
is the smaller of the two issuer's configured tick sizes.
The tick size is imposed by rounding the offer quality
down to nearest tick and recomputing the non-critical
side of the offer. For a buy, the amount offered is
rounded down. For a sell, the amount charged is rounded up.
Gateways must enable a TickSize on their account for this
feature to benefit them.
The primary expected benefit is the elimination of bots
fighting over the tip of the order book. This means:
- Quicker price discovery as outpricing someone by a
microscopic amount is made impossible. Currently
bots can spend hours outbidding each other with no
significant price movement.
- A reduction in offer creation and cancellation spam.
- More offers left on the books as priority means
something when you can't outbid by a microscopic amount.
A conditional suspended payment is a suspended payment where
completion of the payment is contingent upon the fulfillment
of a condition defined by the sender during creation of the
suspended payment.
This commit also introduces the "CryptoConditions" amendment
which controls whether cryptoconditions will be supported
in suspended payments. The existing "SusPay" amendment can
be used to enable suspended payments without enabling the
cryptoconditions code.
The Ripple protocol represent transfer rates and trust line
qualities as fractions of one billion. For example, a transfer
rate of 1% is represented as 1010000000.
Previously, such rates where represented either as std::uint32_t
or std::uint64_t. Other, nominally related types, also used an
integral representation and could be unintentionally substituted.
The new Rate class addresses this by providing a simple, type
safe alternative which also helps make the code self-documenting
since arithmetic operations now can be clearly understood to
involve the scaling of an amount by a rate.
* Tweak account XRP balance and sequence if needed before preclaim.
* Limit total fees in flight to minimum reserve / account balance.
* LastLedgerSequence must be at least 2 more than the current ledger to be queued.
* Limit 10 transactions per account in the queue at a time.
* Limit queuing multiple transactions after transactions that affect authentication.
* Zero base fee transactions are treated as having a fixed fee level of 256000 instead of infinite.
* Full queue: new txn can only kick out a tx if the fee is higher than that account's average fee.
* Queued tx retry limit prevents indefinitely stuck txns.
* Return escalation factors in server_info and _state when escalated.
* Update documentation.
* Update experimental config to only include the % increase.
* Convert TxQ metric magic numbers to experimental config.
The first few transactions are added to the open ledger at
the base fee (ie. 10 drops). Once enough transactions are
added, the required fee will jump dramatically. If additional
transactions are added, the fee will grow exponentially.
Transactions that don't have a high enough fee to be applied to
the ledger are added to the queue in order from highest fee to
lowest. Whenever a new ledger is accepted as validated, transactions
are first applied from the queue to the open ledger in fee order
until either all transactions are applied or the fee again jumps
too high for the remaining transactions.
Current implementation is restricted to one transaction in the
queue per account. Some groundwork has been laid to expand in
the future.
Note that this fee logic escalates independently of the load-based
fee logic (ie. LoadFeeTrack). Submitted transactions must meet
the load fee to be considered for the queue, and must meet both
fees to be put into open ledger.
