A tiny input amount to a payment step can cause this step to output zero. For
example, if a previous steps outputs a dust amount of 10^-80, and this step is a
IOU -> XRP offer, the offer may output zero drops. In this case, call the strand
dry. Before this patch, an error would be logged, the strand would be called
dry; in debug mode an assert triggered.
Note, this patch is not transaction breaking, as the caller did not user the ter
code. The caller only checked for success or failuer.
This patch addresses github issue issue reported here:
https://github.com/ripple/rippled/issues/2929
At this point all of the jss::* names are defined in the same
file. That file has been named JsonFields.h. That file name
has little to do with either JsonStaticStrings (which is what
jss is short for) or with jss. The file is renamed to jss.h
so the file name better reflects what the file contains.
All includes of that file are fixed. A few include order
issues are tidied up along the way.
Many of the warnings on Windows were not resolved, just
silenced with _SILENCE_ALL_CXX17_DEPRECATION_WARNINGS.
They need to be resolved in a future commit.
This changes the rules for payments in two ways:
1) It sets the maximum number of offers any book step can consume from
2000 to 1000.
2) When a strand contains a step that consumes too many offers,
currently the liquidity is not used at all and the strand will
be considered dry. This changes things so the liquidity is used,
however the strand will still be considered dry.
* The compiler can provide many non-explicit constructors for
aggregate types. This is sometimes desired, but it can
happen accidentally, resulting in run-time errors.
* This commit assures that no types are aggregates unless existing
code is using aggregate initialization.
* If any of the destructor, copy assignment or copy constructor
are user-declared, both copy members should be user-declared,
otherwise the compiler-generation of them is deprecated.
If the JobQueue is used during shutdown then those Jobs may access
Stoppables after they have already stopped. This violates the
preconditions of Stoppables and may lead to undefined behavior.
The solution taken here is to reference count all Jobs in the
JobQueue. At stop time all Jobs already in the JobQueue are
allowed to run to completion, but no further Jobs are allowed
into the JobQueue.
If a Job is rejected from the JobQueue (because we are stopping),
then JobQueue::addJob() returns false, so the caller can make any
necessary adjustments.
Replace Taker.cpp with calls to the payment flow() code.
This change required a number of tweaks in the payment flow code.
These tweaks are conditionalized on whether or not offer crossing
is taking place. The flag is explicitly passed as a parameter to
the flow code.
For testing, a class was added that identifies differences in the
contents of two PaymentSandboxes. That code may be reusable in
the future.
None of the Taker offer crossing code is removed. Both versions
of the code are co-resident to support an amendment cut-over.
The code that identifies differences between Taker and Flow offer
crossing is enabled by a feature. That makes it easy to enable
or disable difference logging by changing the config file. This
approach models what was done with the payment flow code. The
differencing code should never be enabled on a production server.
Extensive offer crossing unit tests are added to examine and
verify the behavior of corner cases. The tests are currently
configured to run against both Taker and Flow offer crossing.
This gives us confidence that most cases run identically and
some of the (few) differences in behavior are documented.
* Sanity check on newly created strands
* Better loop detection
* Better tests (test every combination of path element pairs)
* Disallow any root issuer (even for xrp)
* Disallow compount element typs in path
* Issue was not reset when currency was XRP
* Add amendment
* Force jtx to request/receive the 2.0 API
* Force the JSON and WebSocket tests to use 2.0 API
* This specifically allows the Websocket to create 2.0 json/ripple
and get back a 2.0 response.
* Add test for malformed json2
* Add check for parse failure
* Add check for params to be in array form.
* Correct type-o discovered in tests due to stricter checking.
* Add API version to the WSClient & JSONRPCClient test
* Update source.dox with more headers
If the mantissas of two non-native amounts differ by less than 10, then
subtracting them leaves a result of zero. This can cause situations
where `a>b`, yet `a-b == 0`.
One consequence of this is unfunded offers were incorrectly left in
order books. The code would check if the offer would be
consumed (`amount in offer > amount needed`), assume it wouldn't be,
yet when `amount needed` was subtracted from `amount in offer` the
result was zero and the offer was unfunded. This unfunded offer
incorrectly remained on the order book.
This patch fixes this bug.
The XRPEndpointStep bypassed the logic in deferred credits and
incorrectly counted funds acquired during a payment as available for
use in the payment. It also incorrectly used the current ownerCount when
calculating the reserve instead of the owner count as it was at the
beginning of the payment (reducing the owner count is analogous to
acquiring funds during a payment.)
All cases that still used the old RPF code now use new-style pathfinding.
This includes unit tests, RPF requests with a ledger specified, and RPF
requests in standalone mode.
The Ripple protocol represent transfer rates and trust line
qualities as fractions of one billion. For example, a transfer
rate of 1% is represented as 1010000000.
Previously, such rates where represented either as std::uint32_t
or std::uint64_t. Other, nominally related types, also used an
integral representation and could be unintentionally substituted.
The new Rate class addresses this by providing a simple, type
safe alternative which also helps make the code self-documenting
since arithmetic operations now can be clearly understood to
involve the scaling of an amount by a rate.
The Owner count could decrease while evaluating a strand, causing
different behavior in forward passes and reverses passes. The fix treats
a decreased owner count like a deferred credit.
In some situations, deferred credits could cause an XRP balance to be
calculated as negative, triggering some asserts.
When XRP is used as a bridge currency, a path could be falsely marked as
dry. This happens when the XRP/XXX offer recursively checks the XXX/XRP
offer and the XXX/XRP offer could not satisfy the request in a single
call.
With a single strand and limit quality the old payment code incorrectly
computed with multiquailty set to true. This could cause the total
quality to go below the requested quality even if there was liquidity
available above the requested quality value.
