From e3414bf042c7000398ded29f89cf7e6e8b71e519 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Scott Schurr <scott@ripple.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 17:09:24 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] Test how beast::is_call_possible<> handles const-ness.

---
 beast/is_call_possible.h | 10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff --git a/beast/is_call_possible.h b/beast/is_call_possible.h
index e858c2a10..5c18bc3b1 100644
--- a/beast/is_call_possible.h
+++ b/beast/is_call_possible.h
@@ -71,6 +71,11 @@ struct is_call_possible_udt2
     int operator()(int) const;
 };
 
+struct is_call_possible_udt3
+{
+    int operator()(int);
+};
+
 static_assert(is_call_possible<
     is_call_possible_udt1, void(int)>::value, "");
 
@@ -86,6 +91,11 @@ static_assert(! is_call_possible<
 static_assert(! is_call_possible<
     is_call_possible_udt2, void(void)>::value, "");
 
+static_assert(is_call_possible<
+    is_call_possible_udt3, int(int)>::value, "");
+
+static_assert(! is_call_possible<
+    is_call_possible_udt3 const, int(int)>::value, "");
 }
 
 }