Fix FillOrKill kill handling of found unfunded orders.

This commit is contained in:
Arthur Britto
2013-03-07 16:40:00 -08:00
parent 394c7be704
commit 15942616e8
4 changed files with 59 additions and 42 deletions

View File

@@ -944,9 +944,8 @@ TER RippleCalc::calcNodeAdvance(
if (musUnfundedFound.find(uOfferIndex) != musUnfundedFound.end())
{
// Reverse should have previously put bad offer in list.
// An internal error previously left a bad offer.
cLog(lsWARNING) << boost::str(boost::format("calcNodeAdvance: REVERSE INTERNAL ERROR: NON-POSITIVE: saTakerPays=%s saTakerGets=%s")
// An internal error, offer was found failed to place this in musUnfundedFound.
cLog(lsWARNING) << boost::str(boost::format("calcNodeAdvance: PAST INTERNAL ERROR: OFFER NON-POSITIVE: saTakerPays=%s saTakerGets=%s")
% saTakerPays % saTakerGets);
// Just skip it. It will be deleted.
@@ -954,16 +953,19 @@ TER RippleCalc::calcNodeAdvance(
}
else
{
// An internal error failed to place this in musUnfundedFound.
cLog(lsWARNING) << boost::str(boost::format("calcNodeAdvance: OFFER INTERNAL ERROR: NON-POSITIVE: saTakerPays=%s saTakerGets=%s")
// Reverse should have previously put bad offer in list.
// An internal error previously left a bad offer.
cLog(lsWARNING) << boost::str(boost::format("calcNodeAdvance: INTERNAL ERROR: OFFER NON-POSITIVE: saTakerPays=%s saTakerGets=%s")
% saTakerPays % saTakerGets);
assert(false);
// Don't process at all, things are in an unexpected state for this transactions.
terResult = tefEXCEPTION;
}
continue;
}
bEntryAdvance = false;
// Allowed to access source from this node?
// XXX This can get called multiple times for same source in a row, caching result would be nice.
// XXX Going forward could we fund something with a worse quality which was previously skipped? Might need to check
@@ -982,25 +984,12 @@ TER RippleCalc::calcNodeAdvance(
continue;
}
curIssuerNodeConstIterator itPast = mumSource.find(asLine);
bool bFoundPast = itPast != mumSource.end();
// Don't allow a source of funding used in previous increments to be reused.
// XXX This seems overly strict. Why???
if (bFoundPast && itPast->second != uNode)
{
// Temporarily unfunded. Another node uses this source, ignore in this offer.
cLog(lsTRACE) << "calcNodeAdvance: temporarily unfunded offer (past)";
bEntryAdvance = true;
continue;
}
// This is overly strict. For contributions to past. We should only count source if actually used.
curIssuerNodeConstIterator itReverse = psCur.umReverse.find(asLine);
bool bFoundReverse = itReverse != psCur.umReverse.end();
// For this increment, only allow a source to be used once, in the first node encountered from applying offers in
// reverse.
// For this quality increment, only allow a source to be used from a single node, in the first node encountered from applying offers
// in reverse.
if (bFoundReverse && itReverse->second != uNode)
{
// Temporarily unfunded. Another node uses this source, ignore in this offer.
@@ -1010,7 +999,23 @@ TER RippleCalc::calcNodeAdvance(
continue;
}
saOfferFunds = lesActive.accountFunds(uOfrOwnerID, saTakerGets); // Funds left.
curIssuerNodeConstIterator itPast = mumSource.find(asLine);
bool bFoundPast = itPast != mumSource.end();
// Determine if used in past.
// XXX Restriction seems like a misunderstanding.
if (bFoundPast && itPast->second != uNode)
{
// Temporarily unfunded. Another node uses this source, ignore in this offer.
cLog(lsTRACE) << "calcNodeAdvance: temporarily unfunded offer (past)";
bEntryAdvance = true;
continue;
}
// Only the current node is allowed to use the source.
saOfferFunds = lesActive.accountFunds(uOfrOwnerID, saTakerGets); // Funds held.
if (!saOfferFunds.isPositive())
{
@@ -1019,9 +1024,17 @@ TER RippleCalc::calcNodeAdvance(
if (bReverse && !bFoundReverse && !bFoundPast)
{
// Never mentioned before: found unfunded.
// Never mentioned before, clearly just: found unfunded.
// That is, even if this offer fails due to fill or kill still do deletions.
musUnfundedFound.insert(uOfferIndex); // Mark offer for always deletion.
}
else
{
// Moving forward, don't need to check again.
// Or source was used this reverse
// Or source was previously used
// XXX
}
// YYY Could verify offer is correct place for unfundeds.
bEntryAdvance = true;