mirror of
https://github.com/XRPLF/rippled.git
synced 2026-09-27 15:28:03 +00:00
85fc1c5399
The previous commit switched the generated node config from [ips] to [ips_fixed] on the grounds that the variable, the comment and the sibling cfg template all named ips_fixed, and that ips_fixed is the section whose documented meaning fits a private cluster. Both of those are still true. The switch is reverted anyway, because it is a workload change rather than a naming fix. Measured on CI, parent commit against this branch's previous tip, one functional config line apart: span.consensus.ledger_close.p95 0.57 ms -> 6.43 ms (tripped the gate) span.consensus.ledger_close.p99 0.94 ms -> 9.50 ms span.consensus.accept.p50 0.97 ms -> 2.63 ms span.tx.process.p50 0.36 ms -> 0.18 ms (faster) job.acceptLedger.running.p95 21157 us -> 10938 us (faster) Every consensus-path span rose and every transaction-path metric fell, which is the shape a denser always-connected mesh produces and not the shape of run-to-run variance. [ips_fixed] holds connections open to all four peers instead of treating the list as a discovery hint, so each node processes proposals and validations from the full mesh every round. Nothing else in that commit touches the consensus path: the emitted config differed in exactly three lines, of which one is a die message and one expands to an identical string. The committed baseline describes the [ips] topology. Adopting [ips_fixed] therefore needs a refreshed baseline and re-derived bounds, which is the process baselines/README.md already documents for a workload change. Left as its own work item rather than smuggled in behind a section rename, and the reason is now recorded beside the line so it is not repeated. This also falsified a claim the previous commit had written into baselines/README.md and regression-thresholds.json: that none of the six weakly-guarded keys fires on any observed run. Corrected in both, and the measurement above is cited in place of the absolute.