Fixes issue #4937.
The fixReducedOffersV1 amendment fixed certain forms of offer
modification that could lead to blocked order books. Reduced
offers can block order books if the effective quality of the
reduced offer is worse than the quality of the original offer
(from the perspective of the taker). It turns out that, for
small values, the quality of the reduced offer can be
significantly affected by the rounding mode used during
scaling computations.
Issue #4937 identified an additional code path that modified
offers in a way that could lead to blocked order books. This
commit changes the rounding in that newly located code path so
the quality of the modified offer is never worse than the
quality of the offer as it was originally placed.
It is possible that additional ways of producing blocking
offers will come to light. Therefore there may be a future
need for a V3 amendment.
Due to the rounding, LPTokenBalance of the last
Liquidity Provider (LP), might not match this LP's
trustline balance. This fix sets LPTokenBalance on
last LP withdrawal to this LP's LPToken trustline
balance.
* Fix AMM offer rounding and low quality LOB offer blocking AMM:
A single-path AMM offer with account offer on DEX, is always generated
starting with the takerPays first, which is rounded up, and then
the takerGets, which is rounded down. This rounding ensures that the pool's
product invariant is maintained. However, when one of the offer's side
is XRP, this rounding can result in the AMM offer having a lower
quality, potentially causing offer generation to fail if the quality
is lower than the account's offer quality.
To address this issue, the proposed fix adjusts the offer generation process
to start with the XRP side first and always rounds it down. This results
in a smaller offer size, improving the offer's quality. Regardless if the offer
has XRP or not, the rounding is done so that the offer size is minimized.
This change still ensures the product invariant, as the other generated
side is the exact result of the swap-in or swap-out equations.
If a liquidity can be provided by both AMM and LOB offer on offer crossing
then AMM offer is generated so that it matches LOB offer quality. If LOB
offer quality is less than limit quality then generated AMM offer quality
is also less than limit quality and the offer doesn't cross. To address
this issue, if LOB quality is better than limit quality then use LOB
quality to generate AMM offer. Otherwise, don't use the quality to generate
AMM offer. In this case, limitOut() function in StrandFlow limits
the out amount to match strand's quality to limit quality and consume
maximum AMM liquidity.
The AMM has an invariant for swaps where:
new_balance_1*new_balance_2 >= old_balance_1*old_balance_2
Due to rounding, this invariant could sometimes be violated (although by
very small amounts).
This patch introduces an amendment `fixAMMRounding` that changes the
rounding to always favor the AMM. Doing this should maintain the
invariant.
Co-authored-by: Bronek Kozicki
Co-authored-by: thejohnfreeman
It can be difficult to make transaction breaking changes to low level
code because the low level code does not have access to a ledger and the
current activated amendments in that ledger (the "rules"). This patch
adds global access to the current ledger rules as a `std::optional`. If
the optional is not seated, then there is no active transaction.
This amendment, `fixPreviousTxnID`, adds `PreviousTxnID` and
`PreviousTxnLgrSequence` as fields to all ledger objects that did
not already have them included (`DirectoryNode`, `Amendments`,
`FeeSettings`, `NegativeUNL`, and `AMM`). This makes it much easier
to go through the history of these ledger objects.
A large synthetic offer was not handled correctly in the payment engine.
This patch fixes that issue and introduces a new invariant check while
processing synthetic offers.
When calculating reward shares, the amount should always be rounded
down. If the `fixUniversalNumber` amendment is not active, this works
correctly. If it is not active, then the amount is incorrectly rounded
up. This patch introduces an amendment so it will be rounded down.
This amendment fixes an edge case where an empty DID object can be
created. It adds an additional check to ensure that DIDs are
non-empty when created, and returns a `tecEMPTY_DID` error if the DID
would be empty.
* telENV_RPC_FAILED is a new code, reserved exclusively
for unit tests when RPC fails. This will
make those types of errors distinct and easier to test
for when expected and/or diagnose when not.
* Output RPC command result when result is not expected.
This algorithm is about an order of magnitude faster than the existing
algorithm (about 10x faster for encoding and about 15x faster for
decoding - including the double hash for the checksum). The algorithms
use gcc's int128 (fast MS version will have to wait, in the meantime MS
falls back to the slow code).
* It is now an invariant that all constructed Public Keys are valid,
non-empty and contain 33 bytes of data.
* Additionally, the memory footprint of the PublicKey class is reduced.
The size_ data member is declared as static.
* Distinguish and identify the PublisherList retrieved from the local
config file, versus the ones obtained from other validators.
* Fixes#2942
Implement native support for Price Oracles.
A Price Oracle is used to bring real-world data, such as market prices,
onto the blockchain, enabling dApps to access and utilize information
that resides outside the blockchain.
Add Price Oracle functionality:
- OracleSet: create or update the Oracle object
- OracleDelete: delete the Oracle object
To support this functionality add:
- New RPC method, `get_aggregate_price`, to calculate aggregate price for a token pair of the specified oracles
- `ltOracle` object
The `ltOracle` object maintains:
- Oracle Owner's account
- Oracle's metadata
- Up to ten token pairs with the scaled price
- The last update time the token pairs were updated
Add Oracle unit-tests
Add `STObject` constructor to explicitly set the inner object template.
This allows certain AMM transactions to apply in the same ledger:
There is no issue if the trading fee is greater than or equal to 0.01%.
If the trading fee is less than 0.01%, then:
- After AMM create, AMM transactions must wait for one ledger to close
(3-5 seconds).
- After one ledger is validated, all AMM transactions succeed, as
appropriate, except for AMMVote.
- The first AMMVote which votes for a 0 trading fee in a ledger will
succeed. Subsequent AMMVote transactions which vote for a 0 trading
fee will wait for the next ledger (3-5 seconds). This behavior repeats
for each ledger.
This has no effect on the ultimate correctness of AMM. This amendment
will allow the transactions described above to succeed as expected, even
if the trading fee is 0 and the transactions are applied within one
ledger (block).
Without this amendment, an NFTokenAcceptOffer transaction can succeed
even when the NFToken recipient does not have sufficient reserves for
the new NFTokenPage. This allowed accounts to accept NFT sell offers
without having a sufficient reserve. (However, there was no issue in
brokered mode or when a buy offer is involved.)
Instead, the transaction should fail with `tecINSUFFICIENT_RESERVE` as
appropriate. The `fixNFTokenReserve` amendment adds checks in the
NFTokenAcceptOffer transactor to check if the OwnerCount changed. If it
did, then it checks the new reserve requirement.
Fix#4679
* Add logging for Application.cpp sweep()
* Improve lifetime management of ledger objects (`SLE`s)
* Only store SLE digest in CachedView; get SLEs from CachedSLEs
* Also force release of last ledger used for path finding if there are
no path finding requests to process
* Count more ST objects (derive from `CountedObject`)
* Track CachedView stats in CountedObjects
* Rename the CachedView counters
* Fix the scope of the digest lookup lock
Before this patch, if you asked "is it caching?" It was always caching.
This reverts commit 002893f280.
There were two files with conflicts in the automated revert:
- src/ripple/rpc/impl/RPCHelpers.h and
- src/test/rpc/JSONRPC_test.cpp
Those files were manually resolved.
* Remove include <ranges>
* Formatting fix
* Output for subscriptions
* Output from sign, submit etc.
* Output from ledger
* Output from account_tx
* Output from transaction_entry
* Output from tx
* Store close_time_iso in API v2 output
* Add small APIv2 unit test for subscribe
* Add unit test for transaction_entry
* Add unit test for tx
* Remove inLedger from API version 2
* Set ledger_hash and ledger_index
* Move isValidated from RPCHelpers to LedgerMaster
* Store closeTime in LedgerFill
* Time formatting fix
* additional tests for Subscribe unit tests
* Improved comments
* Rename mInLedger to mLedgerIndex
* Minor fixes
* Set ledger_hash on closed ledger, even if not validated
* Update API-CHANGELOG.md
* Add ledger_hash, ledger_index to transaction_entry
* Fix validated and close_time_iso in account_tx
* Fix typos
* Improve getJson for Transaction and STTx
* Minor improvements
* Replace class enum JsonOptions with struct
We may consider turning this into a general-purpose template and using it elsewhere
* simplify the extraction of transactionID from Transaction object
* Remove obsolete comments
* Unconditionally set validated in account_tx output
* Minor improvements
* Minor fixes
---------
Co-authored-by: Chenna Keshava <ckeshavabs@gmail.com>
Introduce the `fixFillOrKill` amendment.
Fix an edge case occurring when an offer with `tfFillOrKill` set (but
without `tfSell` set) fails to cross an offer with a better rate. If
`tfFillOrKill` is set, then the owner must receive the full TakerPays.
Without this amendment, an offer fails if the entire `TakerGets` is not
spent. With this amendment, when `tfSell` is not set, the entire
`TakerGets` does not have to be spent.
For details about OfferCreate, see: https://xrpl.org/offercreate.htmlFix#4684
---------
Co-authored-by: Scott Schurr <scott@ripple.com>
Using the "Amount" field in Payment transactions can cause incorrect
interpretation. There continue to be problems from the use of this
field. "Amount" is rarely the correct field to use; instead,
"delivered_amount" (or "DeliveredAmount") should be used.
Rename the "Amount" field to "DeliverMax", a less misleading name. With
api_version: 2, remove the "Amount" field from Payment transactions.
- Input: "DeliverMax" in `tx_json` is an alias for "Amount"
- sign
- submit (in sign-and-submit mode)
- submit_multisigned
- sign_for
- Output: Add "DeliverMax" where transactions are provided by the API
- ledger
- tx
- tx_history
- account_tx
- transaction_entry
- subscribe (transactions stream)
- Output: Remove "Amount" from API version 2
Fix#3484Fix#3902
Add a new RPC / WS call for `server_definitions`, which returns an
SDK-compatible `definitions.json` (binary enum definitions) generated by
the server. This enables clients/libraries to dynamically work with new
fields and features, such as ones that may become available on side
chains. Clients query `server_definitions` on a node from the network
they want to work with, and immediately know how to speak that node's
binary "language", even if new features are added to it in the future
(as long as there are no new serialized types that the software doesn't
know how to serialize/deserialize).
Example:
```js
> {"command": "server_definitions"}
< {
"result": {
"FIELDS": [
[
"Generic",
{
"isSerialized": false,
"isSigningField": false,
"isVLEncoded": false,
"nth": 0,
"type": "Unknown"
}
],
[
"Invalid",
{
"isSerialized": false,
"isSigningField": false,
"isVLEncoded": false,
"nth": -1,
"type": "Unknown"
}
],
[
"ObjectEndMarker",
{
"isSerialized": false,
"isSigningField": true,
"isVLEncoded": false,
"nth": 1,
"type": "STObject"
}
],
...
```
Close#3657
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Holland <richard.holland@starstone.co.nz>
