Commit Graph

9 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Mayukha Vadari
ce9f0b38a4 Merge branch 'develop' into ripple/wasmi 2025-11-25 02:33:47 +05:30
Mayukha Vadari
35f7cbf772 update 2025-11-25 02:31:51 +05:30
Ayaz Salikhov
adbeb94c2b ci: Only upload artifacts in XRPLF repo owner (#6060)
This change prevents uploading too many artifacts in non-public repositories.
2025-11-20 18:09:03 +00:00
Bart
9b53bd9871 ci: Clean workspace on Windows self-hosted runners (#6024)
This change updates the `cleanup-workspace` action to its latest version, which added support for Windows.
2025-11-12 09:30:45 -05:00
Ayaz Salikhov
c2a90b706f ci: Specify bash as the default shell in workflows (#6021) 2025-11-11 18:17:03 +00:00
Bronek Kozicki
03704f712b chore: Move running of unit tests out of coverage target (#6018)
This change makes the progress of unit tests visible and also gives more flexibility when running them.
2025-11-11 14:55:16 +00:00
Bronek Kozicki
8d2dff2e48 chore: Unify build & test, add ctest to coverage (#6013)
This change unifies the build and test jobs into a single job, and adds `ctest` to coverage reporting.

The mechanics of coverage reporting is slightly complex and most of it is encapsulated in the `coverage` target. The status quo way of preparing coverage reports involves running a single target `cmake --build . --target coverage`, which does three things:
* Build the `rippled` binary (via target dependency)
* Prepare coverage reports:
  * Run `./rippled -u` unit tests.
  * Gather test output and build reports.

This makes it awkward to add an additional `ctest` step between build and coverage reporting steps. The better solution is to split `coverage` target into separate build, followed by `ctest`, followed by test generation. Luckily, the `coverage` target has been designed specifically to support such case; it does not need to build `rippled`, it's just a dependency. Similarly it allows additional tests to be run before gathering test outputs; in principle we could even strip it from running tests and run them separately instead. This means we can keep build, `ctest` and generation of coverage reports as separate steps, as long as the state of build directory is fully (including file timestamps, additional coverage files etc.) preserved between the steps. This means that in order to run `ctest` for coverage reporting we need to integrate build and test into a single job, which this change does.
2025-11-10 10:32:08 -05:00
Bart
1dd60242de ci: Use nproc-2 to set parallelism for builds and tests (#5939)
This change reduces the number of cores used to build and test, as using all cores may be contributing to occasional build and test failures.

Co-authored-by: Bart Thomee <11445373+bthomee@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-10-29 00:07:09 +00:00
Ayaz Salikhov
294e03ecf5 ci: Upload artifacts during build and test in a separate job (#5817) 2025-09-30 16:15:24 +00:00