This change replaces all instances of `<variable> != tesSUCCESS` with `!isTesSuccess(<variable>)` and `<variable> == tesSUCCESS` with `isTesSuccess(<variable>)`.
This change renames all occurrences of `namespace ripple` and `ripple::` to `namespace xrpl` and `xrpl::`, respectively, as well as the names of test suites. It also provides a script to allow developers to replicate the changes in their local branch or fork to avoid conflicts.
This change renames all the `info()` functions to `header()`, since they return `LedgerHeader` structs. It also renames the underlying variables from `info_` to `header_`.
Per XLS-0095, we are taking steps to rename ripple(d) to xrpl(d).
This change specifically removes all copyright notices referencing Ripple, XRPLF, and certain affiliated contributors upon mutual agreement, so the notice in the LICENSE.md file applies throughout. Copyright notices referencing external contributions remain as-is. Duplicate verbiage is also removed.
This change fixes the suite names all around the test files, to make them match to the folder name in which this test files are located. Also, the RCL test files are relocated to the consensus folder, because they are testing consensus functionality.
Fix interactions between NFTokenOffers and trust lines.
Since the NFTokenAcceptOffer does not check the trust line that
the issuer receives as a transfer fee in the NFTokenAcceptOffer,
if the issuer deletes the trust line after NFTokenCreateOffer,
the trust line is created for the issuer by the
NFTokenAcceptOffer. That's fixed.
Resolves#4925.
Fixes issue #4937.
The fixReducedOffersV1 amendment fixed certain forms of offer
modification that could lead to blocked order books. Reduced
offers can block order books if the effective quality of the
reduced offer is worse than the quality of the original offer
(from the perspective of the taker). It turns out that, for
small values, the quality of the reduced offer can be
significantly affected by the rounding mode used during
scaling computations.
Issue #4937 identified an additional code path that modified
offers in a way that could lead to blocked order books. This
commit changes the rounding in that newly located code path so
the quality of the modified offer is never worse than the
quality of the offer as it was originally placed.
It is possible that additional ways of producing blocking
offers will come to light. Therefore there may be a future
need for a V3 amendment.
Introduce the `fixFillOrKill` amendment.
Fix an edge case occurring when an offer with `tfFillOrKill` set (but
without `tfSell` set) fails to cross an offer with a better rate. If
`tfFillOrKill` is set, then the owner must receive the full TakerPays.
Without this amendment, an offer fails if the entire `TakerGets` is not
spent. With this amendment, when `tfSell` is not set, the entire
`TakerGets` does not have to be spent.
For details about OfferCreate, see: https://xrpl.org/offercreate.htmlFix#4684
---------
Co-authored-by: Scott Schurr <scott@ripple.com>
* For example, without this change, to run the TxQ tests, must specify
`--unittest=TxQ1,TxQ2` on the command line. With this change, can use
`--unittest=TxQ`, and both will be run.
* An exact match will prevent any further partial matching.
* This could have some side effects for different tests with a common
name beginning. For example, NFToken, NFTokenBurn, NFTokenDir. This
might be useful. If not, the shorter-named test(s) can be renamed. For
example, NFToken to NFTokens.
* Split the NFToken, NFTokenBurn, and Offer test classes. Potentially speeds
up parallel tests by a factor of 5.
When an AMM account is deleted, the owner directory entries must be
deleted in order to ensure consistent ledger state.
* When deleting AMM account:
* Clean up AMM owner dir, linking AMM account and AMM object
* Delete trust lines to AMM
* Disallow `CheckCreate` to AMM accounts
* AMM cannot cash a check
* Constrain entries in AuthAccounts array to be accounts
* AuthAccounts is an array of objects for the AMMBid transaction
* SetTrust (TrustSet): Allow on AMM only for LP tokens
* If the destination is an AMM account and the trust line doesn't
exist, then:
* If the asset is not the AMM LP token, then fail the tx with
`tecNO_PERMISSION`
* If the AMM is in empty state, then fail the tx with `tecAMM_EMPTY`
* This disallows trustlines to AMM in empty state
* Add AMMID to AMM root account
* Remove lsfAMM flag and use sfAMMID instead
* Remove owner dir entry for ltAMM
* Add `AMMDelete` transaction type to handle amortized deletion
* Limit number of trust lines to delete on final withdraw + AMMDelete
* Put AMM in empty state when LPTokens is 0 upon final withdraw
* Add `tfTwoAssetIfEmpty` deposit option in AMM empty state
* Fail all AMM transactions in AMM empty state except special deposit
* Add `tecINCOMPLETE` to indicate that not all AMM trust lines are
deleted (i.e. partial deletion)
* This is handled in Transactor similar to deleted offers
* Fail AMMDelete with `tecINTERNAL` if AMM root account is nullptr
* Don't validate for invalid asset pair in AMMDelete
* AMMWithdraw deletes AMM trust lines and AMM account/object only if the
number of trust lines is less than max
* Current `maxDeletableAMMTrustLines` = 512
* Check no directory left after AMM trust lines are deleted
* Enable partial trustline deletion in AMMWithdraw
* Add `tecAMM_NOT_EMPTY` to fail any transaction that expects an AMM in
empty state
* Clawback considerations
* Disallow clawback out of AMM account
* Disallow AMM create if issuer can claw back
This patch applies to the AMM implementation in #4294.
Acknowledgements:
Richard Holland and Nik Bougalis for responsibly disclosing this issue.
Bug Bounties and Responsible Disclosures:
We welcome reviews of the project code and urge researchers to
responsibly disclose any issues they may find.
To report a bug, please send a detailed report to:
bugs@xrpl.org
Signed-off-by: Manoj Doshi <mdoshi@ripple.com>
Add AMM functionality:
- InstanceCreate
- Deposit
- Withdraw
- Governance
- Auctioning
- payment engine integration
To support this functionality, add:
- New RPC method, `amm_info`, to fetch pool and LPT balances
- AMM Root Account
- trust line for each IOU AMM token
- trust line to track Liquidity Provider Tokens (LPT)
- `ltAMM` object
The `ltAMM` object tracks:
- fee votes
- auction slot bids
- AMM tokens pair
- total outstanding tokens balance
- `AMMID` to AMM `RootAccountID` mapping
Add new classes to facilitate AMM integration into the payment engine.
`BookStep` uses these classes to infer if AMM liquidity can be consumed.
The AMM formula implementation uses the new Number class added in #4192.
IOUAmount and STAmount use Number arithmetic.
Add AMM unit tests for all features.
AMM requires the following amendments:
- featureAMM
- fixUniversalNumber
- featureFlowCross
Notes:
- Current trading fee threshold is 1%
- AMM currency is generated by: 0x03 + 152 bits of sha256{cur1, cur2}
- Current max AMM Offers is 30
---------
Co-authored-by: Howard Hinnant <howard.hinnant@gmail.com>
Curtail the occurrence of order books that are blocked by reduced offers
with the implementation of the fixReducedOffersV1 amendment.
This commit identifies three ways in which offers can be reduced:
1. A new offer can be partially crossed by existing offers, so the new
offer is reduced when placed in the ledger.
2. An in-ledger offer can be partially crossed by a new offer in a
transaction. So the in-ledger offer is reduced by the new offer.
3. An in-ledger offer may be under-funded. In this case the in-ledger
offer is scaled down to match the available funds.
Reduced offers can block order books if the effective quality of the
reduced offer is worse than the quality of the original offer (from the
perspective of the taker). It turns out that, for small values, the
quality of the reduced offer can be significantly affected by the
rounding mode used during scaling computations.
This commit adjusts some rounding modes so that the quality of a reduced
offer is always at least as good (from the taker's perspective) as the
original offer.
The amendment is titled fixReducedOffersV1 because additional ways of
producing reduced offers may come to light. Therefore, there may be a
future need for a V2 amendment.
* Create the FeeSettings object in genesis ledger.
* Initialize with default values from the config. Removes the need to
pass a Config down into the Ledger initialization functions, including
setup().
* Drop the undocumented fee config settings in favor of the [voting]
section.
* Fix#3734.
* If you previously used fee_account_reserve and/or fee_owner_reserve,
you should change to using the [voting] section instead. Example:
```
[voting]
account_reserve=10000000
owner_reserve=2000000
```
* Because old Mainnet ledgers (prior to 562177 - yes, I looked it up)
don't have FeeSettings, some of the other ctors will default them to
the config values before setup() tries to load the object.
* Update default Config fee values to match Mainnet.
* Fix unit tests:
* Updated fees: Some tests are converted to use computed values of fee
object, but the default Env config was also updated to fix the rest.
* Unit tests that check the structure of the ledger have updated
hashes and counts.
A recent version of clang notes a number of places in range
for loops where the code base was making unnecessary copies
or using const lvalue references to extend lifetimes. This
fixes the places that clang identified.
Support for 'out-of-sequence' transaction execution was introduced
in commit 7724cca384.
The changes in that commit were gated under a feature but there was
no corresponding amendment introduced that would allow the network
to vote on this amendment.
This commit introduces 'TicketBatch' amendment as the amendment
that is associated with the tickets feature. If the amendment is
enabled, it will activate support for tickets.
This commit also removes several workarounds that are no longer
needed in unit tests.
Tickets are a mechanism to allow for the "out-of-order" execution of
transactions on the XRP Ledger.
This commit, if merged, reworks the existing support for tickets and
introduces support for 'ticket batching', completing the feature set
needed for tickets.
The code is gated under the newly-introduced `TicketBatch` amendment
and the `Tickets` amendment, which is not presently active on the
network, is being removed.
The specification for this change can be found at:
https://github.com/xrp-community/standards-drafts/issues/16
