This change replaces all instances of `<variable> != tesSUCCESS` with `!isTesSuccess(<variable>)` and `<variable> == tesSUCCESS` with `isTesSuccess(<variable>)`.
This change renames all occurrences of `namespace ripple` and `ripple::` to `namespace xrpl` and `xrpl::`, respectively, as well as the names of test suites. It also provides a script to allow developers to replicate the changes in their local branch or fork to avoid conflicts.
This change renames all the `info()` functions to `header()`, since they return `LedgerHeader` structs. It also renames the underlying variables from `info_` to `header_`.
Per XLS-0095, we are taking steps to rename ripple(d) to xrpl(d).
This change specifically removes all copyright notices referencing Ripple, XRPLF, and certain affiliated contributors upon mutual agreement, so the notice in the LICENSE.md file applies throughout. Copyright notices referencing external contributions remain as-is. Duplicate verbiage is also removed.
This change fixes the suite names all around the test files, to make them match to the folder name in which this test files are located. Also, the RCL test files are relocated to the consensus folder, because they are testing consensus functionality.
Fix interactions between NFTokenOffers and trust lines.
Since the NFTokenAcceptOffer does not check the trust line that
the issuer receives as a transfer fee in the NFTokenAcceptOffer,
if the issuer deletes the trust line after NFTokenCreateOffer,
the trust line is created for the issuer by the
NFTokenAcceptOffer. That's fixed.
Resolves#4925.
Fixes issue #4937.
The fixReducedOffersV1 amendment fixed certain forms of offer
modification that could lead to blocked order books. Reduced
offers can block order books if the effective quality of the
reduced offer is worse than the quality of the original offer
(from the perspective of the taker). It turns out that, for
small values, the quality of the reduced offer can be
significantly affected by the rounding mode used during
scaling computations.
Issue #4937 identified an additional code path that modified
offers in a way that could lead to blocked order books. This
commit changes the rounding in that newly located code path so
the quality of the modified offer is never worse than the
quality of the offer as it was originally placed.
It is possible that additional ways of producing blocking
offers will come to light. Therefore there may be a future
need for a V3 amendment.
Introduce the `fixFillOrKill` amendment.
Fix an edge case occurring when an offer with `tfFillOrKill` set (but
without `tfSell` set) fails to cross an offer with a better rate. If
`tfFillOrKill` is set, then the owner must receive the full TakerPays.
Without this amendment, an offer fails if the entire `TakerGets` is not
spent. With this amendment, when `tfSell` is not set, the entire
`TakerGets` does not have to be spent.
For details about OfferCreate, see: https://xrpl.org/offercreate.htmlFix#4684
---------
Co-authored-by: Scott Schurr <scott@ripple.com>
* For example, without this change, to run the TxQ tests, must specify
`--unittest=TxQ1,TxQ2` on the command line. With this change, can use
`--unittest=TxQ`, and both will be run.
* An exact match will prevent any further partial matching.
* This could have some side effects for different tests with a common
name beginning. For example, NFToken, NFTokenBurn, NFTokenDir. This
might be useful. If not, the shorter-named test(s) can be renamed. For
example, NFToken to NFTokens.
* Split the NFToken, NFTokenBurn, and Offer test classes. Potentially speeds
up parallel tests by a factor of 5.
When an AMM account is deleted, the owner directory entries must be
deleted in order to ensure consistent ledger state.
* When deleting AMM account:
* Clean up AMM owner dir, linking AMM account and AMM object
* Delete trust lines to AMM
* Disallow `CheckCreate` to AMM accounts
* AMM cannot cash a check
* Constrain entries in AuthAccounts array to be accounts
* AuthAccounts is an array of objects for the AMMBid transaction
* SetTrust (TrustSet): Allow on AMM only for LP tokens
* If the destination is an AMM account and the trust line doesn't
exist, then:
* If the asset is not the AMM LP token, then fail the tx with
`tecNO_PERMISSION`
* If the AMM is in empty state, then fail the tx with `tecAMM_EMPTY`
* This disallows trustlines to AMM in empty state
* Add AMMID to AMM root account
* Remove lsfAMM flag and use sfAMMID instead
* Remove owner dir entry for ltAMM
* Add `AMMDelete` transaction type to handle amortized deletion
* Limit number of trust lines to delete on final withdraw + AMMDelete
* Put AMM in empty state when LPTokens is 0 upon final withdraw
* Add `tfTwoAssetIfEmpty` deposit option in AMM empty state
* Fail all AMM transactions in AMM empty state except special deposit
* Add `tecINCOMPLETE` to indicate that not all AMM trust lines are
deleted (i.e. partial deletion)
* This is handled in Transactor similar to deleted offers
* Fail AMMDelete with `tecINTERNAL` if AMM root account is nullptr
* Don't validate for invalid asset pair in AMMDelete
* AMMWithdraw deletes AMM trust lines and AMM account/object only if the
number of trust lines is less than max
* Current `maxDeletableAMMTrustLines` = 512
* Check no directory left after AMM trust lines are deleted
* Enable partial trustline deletion in AMMWithdraw
* Add `tecAMM_NOT_EMPTY` to fail any transaction that expects an AMM in
empty state
* Clawback considerations
* Disallow clawback out of AMM account
* Disallow AMM create if issuer can claw back
This patch applies to the AMM implementation in #4294.
Acknowledgements:
Richard Holland and Nik Bougalis for responsibly disclosing this issue.
Bug Bounties and Responsible Disclosures:
We welcome reviews of the project code and urge researchers to
responsibly disclose any issues they may find.
To report a bug, please send a detailed report to:
bugs@xrpl.org
Signed-off-by: Manoj Doshi <mdoshi@ripple.com>
