This change renames all occurrences of `namespace ripple` and `ripple::` to `namespace xrpl` and `xrpl::`, respectively, as well as the names of test suites. It also provides a script to allow developers to replicate the changes in their local branch or fork to avoid conflicts.
Per XLS-0095, we are taking steps to rename ripple(d) to xrpl(d).
This change specifically removes all copyright notices referencing Ripple, XRPLF, and certain affiliated contributors upon mutual agreement, so the notice in the LICENSE.md file applies throughout. Copyright notices referencing external contributions remain as-is. Duplicate verbiage is also removed.
This is a major refactor of LedgerEntry.cpp. It adds a number of helper functions to make the code easier to maintain.
It also splits up the ledger and ledger_entry tests into different files, and cleans up the ledger_entry tests to make them easier to write and maintain.
This refactor also caught a few bugs in some of the other RPC processing, so those are fixed along the way.
- Specification: [XRPLF/XRPL-Standards 56](https://github.com/XRPLF/XRPL-Standards/blob/master/XLS-0056d-batch/README.md)
- Amendment: `Batch`
- Implements execution of multiple transactions within a single batch transaction with four execution modes: `tfAllOrNothing`, `tfOnlyOne`, `tfUntilFailure`, and `tfIndependent`.
- Enables atomic multi-party transactions where multiple accounts can participate in a single batch, with up to 8 inner transactions and 8 batch signers per batch transaction.
- Inner transactions use `tfInnerBatchTxn` flag with zero fees, no signature, and empty signing public key.
- Inner transactions are applied after the outer batch succeeds via the `applyBatchTransactions` function in apply.cpp.
- Network layer prevents relay of transactions with `tfInnerBatchTxn` flag - each peer applies inner transactions locally from the batch.
- Batch transactions are excluded from AccountDelegate permissions but inner transactions retain full delegation support.
- Metadata includes `ParentBatchID` linking inner transactions to their containing batch for traceability and auditing.
- Extended STTx with batch-specific signature verification methods and added protocol structures (`sfRawTransactions`, `sfBatchSigners`).
The codebase is filled with includes that are unused, and which thus can be removed. At the same time, the files often do not include all headers that contain the definitions used in those files. This change uses clang-format and clang-tidy to clean up the includes, with minor manual intervention to ensure the code compiles on all platforms.
A bridge connects two blockchains: a locking chain and an issuing
chain (also called a mainchain and a sidechain). Both are independent
ledgers, with their own validators and potentially their own custom
transactions. Importantly, there is a way to move assets from the
locking chain to the issuing chain and a way to return those assets from
the issuing chain back to the locking chain: the bridge. This key
operation is called a cross-chain transfer. A cross-chain transfer is
not a single transaction. It happens on two chains, requires multiple
transactions, and involves an additional server type called a "witness".
A bridge does not exchange assets between two ledgers. Instead, it locks
assets on one ledger (the "locking chain") and represents those assets
with wrapped assets on another chain (the "issuing chain"). A good model
to keep in mind is a box with an infinite supply of wrapped assets.
Putting an asset from the locking chain into the box will release a
wrapped asset onto the issuing chain. Putting a wrapped asset from the
issuing chain back into the box will release one of the existing locking
chain assets back onto the locking chain. There is no other way to get
assets into or out of the box. Note that there is no way for the box to
"run out of" wrapped assets - it has an infinite supply.
Co-authored-by: Gregory Popovitch <greg7mdp@gmail.com>
