This change implements the account permission delegation described in XLS-75d, see https://github.com/XRPLF/XRPL-Standards/pull/257.
* Introduces transaction-level and granular permissions that can be delegated to other accounts.
* Adds `DelegateSet` transaction to grant specified permissions to another account.
* Adds `ltDelegate` ledger object to maintain the permission list for delegating/delegated account pair.
* Adds an optional `Delegate` field in common fields, allowing a delegated account to send transactions on behalf of the delegating account within the granted permission scope. The `Account` field remains the delegating account; the `Delegate` field specifies the delegated account. The transaction is signed by the delegated account.
Combines four related changes:
1. "Decrease `shouldRelay` limit to 30s." Pretty self-explanatory. Currently, the limit is 5 minutes, by which point the `HashRouter` entry could have expired, making this transaction look brand new (and thus causing it to be relayed back to peers which have sent it to us recently).
2. "Give a transaction more chances to be retried." Will put a transaction into `LedgerMaster`'s held transactions if the transaction gets a `ter`, `tel`, or `tef` result. Old behavior was just `ter`.
* Additionally, to prevent a transaction from being repeatedly held indefinitely, it must meet some extra conditions. (Documented in a comment in the code.)
3. "Pop all transactions with sequential sequences, or tickets." When a transaction is processed successfully, currently, one held transaction for the same account (if any) will be popped out of the held transactions list, and queued up for the next transaction batch. This change pops all transactions for the account, but only if they have sequential sequences (for non-ticket transactions) or use a ticket. This issue was identified from interactions with @mtrippled's #4504, which was merged, but unfortunately reverted later by #4852. When the batches were spaced out, it could potentially take a very long time for a large number of held transactions for an account to get processed through. However, whether batched or not, this change will help get held transactions cleared out, particularly if a missing earlier transaction is what held them up.
4. "Process held transactions through existing NetworkOPs batching." In the current processing, at the end of each consensus round, all held transactions are directly applied to the open ledger, then the held list is reset. This bypasses all of the logic in `NetworkOPs::apply` which, among other things, broadcasts successful transactions to peers. This means that the transaction may not get broadcast to peers for a really long time (5 minutes in the current implementation, or 30 seconds with this first commit). If the node is a bottleneck (either due to network configuration, or because the transaction was submitted locally), the transaction may not be seen by any other nodes or validators before it expires or causes other problems.
This PR replaces the word `failed` with `failure` in any test names and renames some test files to fix MSVC warnings, so that it is easier to search through the test output to find tests that failed.
This change introduces a new fix amendment (`fixPayChanV1`) that prevents the creation of new `PaymentChannelCreate` transaction with a `CancelAfter` time less than the current ledger time. It piggy backs off of fix1571.
Once the amendment is activated, creating a new `PaymentChannel` will require that if you specify the `CancelAfter` time/value, that value must be greater than or equal to the current ledger time.
Currently users can create a payment channel where the `CancelAfter` time is before the current ledger time. This results in the payment channel being immediately closed on the next PaymentChannel transaction.
In preparation for a potential reference fee change we would like to verify that fee change works as expected. The first step is to fix all unit tests to be able to work with different reference fee values.
The codebase is filled with includes that are unused, and which thus can be removed. At the same time, the files often do not include all headers that contain the definitions used in those files. This change uses clang-format and clang-tidy to clean up the includes, with minor manual intervention to ensure the code compiles on all platforms.
- Drop duplicate outgoing TMGetLedger messages per peer
- Allow a retry after 30s in case of peer or network congestion.
- Addresses RIPD-1870
- (Changes levelization. That is not desirable, and will need to be fixed.)
- Drop duplicate incoming TMGetLedger messages per peer
- Allow a retry after 15s in case of peer or network congestion.
- The requestCookie is ignored when computing the hash, thus increasing
the chances of detecting duplicate messages.
- With duplicate messages, keep track of the different requestCookies
(or lack of cookie). When work is finally done for a given request,
send the response to all the peers that are waiting on the request,
sending one message per peer, including all the cookies and
a "directResponse" flag indicating the data is intended for the
sender, too.
- Addresses RIPD-1871
- Drop duplicate incoming TMLedgerData messages
- Addresses RIPD-1869
- Improve logging related to ledger acquisition
- Class "CanProcess" to keep track of processing of distinct items
---------
Co-authored-by: Valentin Balaschenko <13349202+vlntb@users.noreply.github.com>
Rewrites the code so that the lock is not held during the callback. Instead it locks twice, once before, and once after. This is safe due to the structure of the code, but is checked after the second lock. This allows mutex_ to be changed back to a regular mutex.
If the permissioned domains amendment XLS-80 is enabled before credentials XLS-70, then the permissioned domain users will not be able to match any credentials. The changes here prevent the creation of any permissioned domain objects if credentials are not enabled.
- spec: XRPLF/XRPL-Standards#220
- amendment: "DeepFreeze"
- implemented deep freeze spec to allow token issuers to prevent currency holders from being able to acquire more of these tokens.
- in combination with normal freeze, deep freeze effectively prevents any balance trust line balance change of a currency holder (except direct issuer <-> holder payments).
- added 2 new invariant checks to verify that deep freeze cannot be enacted without normal freeze and transfer is not frozen.
- made some fixes to existing freeze handling.
Co-authored-by: Ed Hennis <ed@ripple.com>
Co-authored-by: Howard Hinnant <howard.hinnant@gmail.com>
- Fix an erroneous high fee penalty that peers could incur for sending
older transactions.
- Update to the fees charged for imposing a load on the server.
- Prevent the relaying of internal pseudo-transactions.
- Before: Pseudo-transactions received from a peer will fail the signature
check, even if they were requested (using TMGetObjectByHash), because
they have no signature. This causes the peer to be charge for an
invalid signature.
- After: Pseudo-transactions, are put into the global cache
(TransactionMaster) only. If the transaction is not part of
a TMTransactions batch, the peer is charged an unwanted data fee.
These fees will not be a problem in the normal course of operations,
but should dissuade peers from behaving badly by sending a bunch of
junk.
- Improve logging: include the reason for fees charged to a peer.
Co-authored-by: Ed Hennis <ed@ripple.com>
Replace Issue in STIssue with Asset. STIssue with MPTIssue is only used in MPT tests.
Will be used in Vault and in transactions with STIssue fields once MPT is integrated into DEX.
* upstream/master:
Set version to 2.2.2
Allow only 1 job queue slot for each validation ledger check
Allow only 1 job queue slot for acquiring inbound ledger.
Track latencies of certain code blocks, and log if they take too long
* Log when duplicate concurrent inbound ledger are filtered.
* RAII for containers that track concurrent inbound ledger.
* Comment on when to asynchronously acquire inbound ledgers, which
is possible to be always OK, but should have further review.
* Other small logging changes
Co-authored-by: Ed Hennis <ed@ripple.com>
* Add fixNFTokenPageLinks amendment:
It was discovered that under rare circumstances the links between
NFTokenPages could be removed. If this happens, then the
account_objects and account_nfts RPC commands under-report the
NFTokens owned by an account.
The fixNFTokenPageLinks amendment does the following to address
the problem:
- It fixes the underlying problem so no further broken links
should be created.
- It adds Invariants so, if such damage were introduced in the
future, an invariant would stop it.
- It adds a new FixLedgerState transaction that repairs
directories that were damaged in this fashion.
- It adds unit tests for all of it.
The names of the files should reflect the name of the Dir class.
Co-authored-by: Zack Brunson <Zshooter@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Ed Hennis <ed@ripple.com>
Fix interactions between NFTokenOffers and trust lines.
Since the NFTokenAcceptOffer does not check the trust line that
the issuer receives as a transfer fee in the NFTokenAcceptOffer,
if the issuer deletes the trust line after NFTokenCreateOffer,
the trust line is created for the issuer by the
NFTokenAcceptOffer. That's fixed.
Resolves#4925.
Fixes issue #4937.
The fixReducedOffersV1 amendment fixed certain forms of offer
modification that could lead to blocked order books. Reduced
offers can block order books if the effective quality of the
reduced offer is worse than the quality of the original offer
(from the perspective of the taker). It turns out that, for
small values, the quality of the reduced offer can be
significantly affected by the rounding mode used during
scaling computations.
Issue #4937 identified an additional code path that modified
offers in a way that could lead to blocked order books. This
commit changes the rounding in that newly located code path so
the quality of the modified offer is never worse than the
quality of the offer as it was originally placed.
It is possible that additional ways of producing blocking
offers will come to light. Therefore there may be a future
need for a V3 amendment.
