Commit Graph

10 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Bart
2406b28e64 refactor: Remove unused and add missing includes (#5293)
The codebase is filled with includes that are unused, and which thus can be removed. At the same time, the files often do not include all headers that contain the definitions used in those files. This change uses clang-format and clang-tidy to clean up the includes, with minor manual intervention to ensure the code compiles on all platforms.
2025-03-11 14:16:45 -04:00
Pretty Printer
1d23148e6d Rewrite includes (#4997) 2024-06-20 13:57:16 -05:00
Gregory Tsipenyuk
2a25f58d40 Fix adjustAmountsByLPTokens():
The fix is to return the actual adjusted lp tokens and amounts
by the function.
2024-05-16 13:32:05 -04:00
Gregory Tsipenyuk
2705109592 Add the fixAMMOfferRounding amendment: (#4983)
* Fix AMM offer rounding and low quality LOB offer blocking AMM:

A single-path AMM offer with account offer on DEX, is always generated
starting with the takerPays first, which is rounded up, and then
the takerGets, which is rounded down. This rounding ensures that the pool's
product invariant is maintained. However, when one of the offer's side
is XRP, this rounding can result in the AMM offer having a lower
quality, potentially causing offer generation to fail if the quality
is lower than the account's offer quality.

To address this issue, the proposed fix adjusts the offer generation process
to start with the XRP side first and always rounds it down. This results
in a smaller offer size, improving the offer's quality. Regardless if the offer
has XRP or not, the rounding is done so that the offer size is minimized.
This change still ensures the product invariant, as the other generated
side is the exact result of the swap-in or swap-out equations.

If a liquidity can be provided by both AMM and LOB offer on offer crossing
then AMM offer is generated so that it matches LOB offer quality. If LOB
offer quality is less than limit quality then generated AMM offer quality
is also less than limit quality and the offer doesn't cross. To address
this issue, if LOB quality is better than limit quality then use LOB
quality to generate AMM offer. Otherwise, don't use the quality to generate
AMM offer. In this case, limitOut() function in StrandFlow limits
the out amount to match strand's quality to limit quality and consume
maximum AMM liquidity.
2024-05-14 15:28:38 -04:00
seelabs
3f7ce939c8 fix amendment: AMM swap should honor invariants: (#5002)
The AMM has an invariant for swaps where:
new_balance_1*new_balance_2 >= old_balance_1*old_balance_2

Due to rounding, this invariant could sometimes be violated (although by
very small amounts).

This patch introduces an amendment `fixAMMRounding` that changes the
rounding to always favor the AMM. Doing this should maintain the
invariant.

Co-authored-by: Bronek Kozicki
Co-authored-by: thejohnfreeman
2024-04-25 21:15:19 -04:00
John Freeman
24a275ba25 test: Add tests to raise coverage of AMM (#4971)
---------

Co-authored-by: Howard Hinnant <howard.hinnant@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Mark Travis <mtravis@ripple.com>
Co-authored-by: Bronek Kozicki <brok@incorrekt.com>
Co-authored-by: Mayukha Vadari <mvadari@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Chenna Keshava <ckeshavabs@gmail.com>
2024-04-18 15:25:22 -04:00
Mayukha Vadari
659bd99a67 fix amendment to add PreviousTxnID/PreviousTxnLgrSequence (#4751)
This amendment, `fixPreviousTxnID`, adds `PreviousTxnID` and
`PreviousTxnLgrSequence` as fields to all ledger objects that did
not already have them included (`DirectoryNode`, `Amendments`,
`FeeSettings`, `NegativeUNL`, and `AMM`). This makes it much easier
to go through the history of these ledger objects.
2024-04-18 10:41:25 -04:00
Gregory Tsipenyuk
3b624d8bf8 fixFillOrKill: fix offer crossing with tfFillOrKill (#4694)
Introduce the `fixFillOrKill` amendment.

Fix an edge case occurring when an offer with `tfFillOrKill` set (but
without `tfSell` set) fails to cross an offer with a better rate. If
`tfFillOrKill` is set, then the owner must receive the full TakerPays.
Without this amendment, an offer fails if the entire `TakerGets` is not
spent. With this amendment, when `tfSell` is not set, the entire
`TakerGets` does not have to be spent.

For details about OfferCreate, see: https://xrpl.org/offercreate.html

Fix #4684

---------

Co-authored-by: Scott Schurr <scott@ripple.com>
2023-10-30 14:05:46 -07:00
Gregory Tsipenyuk
58f7aecb0b fix(AMM): prevent orphaned objects, inconsistent ledger state: (#4626)
When an AMM account is deleted, the owner directory entries must be
deleted in order to ensure consistent ledger state.

* When deleting AMM account:
  * Clean up AMM owner dir, linking AMM account and AMM object
  * Delete trust lines to AMM
* Disallow `CheckCreate` to AMM accounts
  * AMM cannot cash a check
* Constrain entries in AuthAccounts array to be accounts
  * AuthAccounts is an array of objects for the AMMBid transaction
* SetTrust (TrustSet): Allow on AMM only for LP tokens
  * If the destination is an AMM account and the trust line doesn't
    exist, then:
    * If the asset is not the AMM LP token, then fail the tx with
      `tecNO_PERMISSION`
    * If the AMM is in empty state, then fail the tx with `tecAMM_EMPTY`
      * This disallows trustlines to AMM in empty state
* Add AMMID to AMM root account
  * Remove lsfAMM flag and use sfAMMID instead
* Remove owner dir entry for ltAMM
* Add `AMMDelete` transaction type to handle amortized deletion
  * Limit number of trust lines to delete on final withdraw + AMMDelete
  * Put AMM in empty state when LPTokens is 0 upon final withdraw
  * Add `tfTwoAssetIfEmpty` deposit option in AMM empty state
  * Fail all AMM transactions in AMM empty state except special deposit
  * Add `tecINCOMPLETE` to indicate that not all AMM trust lines are
    deleted (i.e. partial deletion)
    * This is handled in Transactor similar to deleted offers
  * Fail AMMDelete with `tecINTERNAL` if AMM root account is nullptr
  * Don't validate for invalid asset pair in AMMDelete
* AMMWithdraw deletes AMM trust lines and AMM account/object only if the
  number of trust lines is less than max
  * Current `maxDeletableAMMTrustLines` = 512
  * Check no directory left after AMM trust lines are deleted
  * Enable partial trustline deletion in AMMWithdraw
* Add `tecAMM_NOT_EMPTY` to fail any transaction that expects an AMM in
  empty state
* Clawback considerations
  * Disallow clawback out of AMM account
  * Disallow AMM create if issuer can claw back

This patch applies to the AMM implementation in #4294.

Acknowledgements:
Richard Holland and Nik Bougalis for responsibly disclosing this issue.

Bug Bounties and Responsible Disclosures:
We welcome reviews of the project code and urge researchers to
responsibly disclose any issues they may find.

To report a bug, please send a detailed report to:

    bugs@xrpl.org

Signed-off-by: Manoj Doshi <mdoshi@ripple.com>
2023-08-21 16:15:08 -07:00
Gregory Tsipenyuk
3c9db4b69e Introduce AMM support (XLS-30d): (#4294)
Add AMM functionality:
- InstanceCreate
- Deposit
- Withdraw
- Governance
- Auctioning
- payment engine integration

To support this functionality, add:
- New RPC method, `amm_info`, to fetch pool and LPT balances
- AMM Root Account
- trust line for each IOU AMM token
- trust line to track Liquidity Provider Tokens (LPT)
- `ltAMM` object

The `ltAMM` object tracks:
- fee votes
- auction slot bids
- AMM tokens pair
- total outstanding tokens balance
- `AMMID` to AMM `RootAccountID` mapping

Add new classes to facilitate AMM integration into the payment engine.
`BookStep` uses these classes to infer if AMM liquidity can be consumed.

The AMM formula implementation uses the new Number class added in #4192.
IOUAmount and STAmount use Number arithmetic.

Add AMM unit tests for all features.

AMM requires the following amendments:
- featureAMM
- fixUniversalNumber
- featureFlowCross

Notes:
- Current trading fee threshold is 1%
- AMM currency is generated by: 0x03 + 152 bits of sha256{cur1, cur2}
- Current max AMM Offers is 30

---------

Co-authored-by: Howard Hinnant <howard.hinnant@gmail.com>
2023-07-12 13:52:50 -04:00