This change renames all occurrences of `namespace ripple` and `ripple::` to `namespace xrpl` and `xrpl::`, respectively, as well as the names of test suites. It also provides a script to allow developers to replicate the changes in their local branch or fork to avoid conflicts.
Per XLS-0095, we are taking steps to rename ripple(d) to xrpl(d).
This change specifically removes all copyright notices referencing Ripple, XRPLF, and certain affiliated contributors upon mutual agreement, so the notice in the LICENSE.md file applies throughout. Copyright notices referencing external contributions remain as-is. Duplicate verbiage is also removed.
Amendments activated for more than 2 years can be retired, and obsolete retirements that were never activated can also be removed after 2 years. This change retires the NonFungibleTokensV1_1, fixNonFungibleTokensV1_2, and fixNFTokenRemint amendments, and removes the NonFungibleTokensV1, fixNFTokenNegOffer, and fixNFTokenDirV1 amendments.
The codebase is filled with includes that are unused, and which thus can be removed. At the same time, the files often do not include all headers that contain the definitions used in those files. This change uses clang-format and clang-tidy to clean up the includes, with minor manual intervention to ensure the code compiles on all platforms.
Without the protocol amendment introduced by this commit, an NFT ID can
be reminted in this manner:
1. Alice creates an account and mints an NFT.
2. Alice burns the NFT with an `NFTokenBurn` transaction.
3. Alice deletes her account with an `AccountDelete` transaction.
4. Alice re-creates her account.
5. Alice mints an NFT with an `NFTokenMint` transaction with params:
`NFTokenTaxon` = 0, `Flags` = 9).
This will mint a NFT with the same `NFTokenID` as the one minted in step
1. The params that construct the NFT ID will cause a collision in
`NFTokenID` if their values are equal before and after the remint.
With the `fixNFTokenRemint` amendment, there is a new sequence number
construct which avoids this scenario:
- A new `AccountRoot` field, `FirstNFTSequence`, stays constant over
time.
- This field is set to the current account sequence when the account
issues their first NFT.
- Otherwise, it is not set.
- The sequence of a newly-minted NFT is computed by: `FirstNFTSequence +
MintedNFTokens`.
- `MintedNFTokens` is then incremented by 1 for each mint.
Furthermore, there is a new account deletion restriction:
- An account can only be deleted if `FirstNFTSequence + MintedNFTokens +
256` is less than the current ledger sequence.
- 256 was chosen because it already exists in the current account
deletion constraint.
Without this restriction, an NFT may still be remintable. Example
scenario:
1. Alice's account sequence is at 1.
2. Bob is Alice's authorized minter.
3. Bob mints 500 NFTs for Alice. The NFTs will have sequences 1-501, as
NFT sequence is computed by `FirstNFTokenSequence + MintedNFTokens`).
4. Alice deletes her account at ledger 257 (as required by the existing
`AccountDelete` amendment).
5. Alice re-creates her account at ledger 258.
6. Alice mints an NFT. `FirstNFTokenSequence` initializes to her account
sequence (258), and `MintedNFTokens` initializes as 0. This
newly-minted NFT would have a sequence number of 258, which is a
duplicate of what she issued through authorized minting before she
deleted her account.
---------
Signed-off-by: Shawn Xie <shawnxie920@gmail.com>
