mirror of
https://github.com/XRPLF/rippled.git
synced 2025-11-04 11:15:56 +00:00
docs: Document the process for merging pull requests (#5010)
This commit is contained in:
220
CONTRIBUTING.md
220
CONTRIBUTING.md
@@ -73,27 +73,235 @@ The source must be formatted according to the style guide below.
|
||||
|
||||
Header includes must be [levelized](./Builds/levelization).
|
||||
|
||||
Changes should be usually squashed down into a single commit.
|
||||
Some larger or more complicated change sets make more sense,
|
||||
and are easier to review if organized into multiple logical commits.
|
||||
Either way, all commits should fit the following criteria:
|
||||
* Changes should be presented in a single commit or a logical
|
||||
sequence of commits.
|
||||
Specifically, chronological commits that simply
|
||||
reflect the history of how the author implemented
|
||||
the change, "warts and all", are not useful to
|
||||
reviewers.
|
||||
* Every commit should have a [good message](#good-commit-messages).
|
||||
to explain a specific aspects of the change.
|
||||
* Every commit should be signed.
|
||||
* Every commit should be well-formed (builds successfully,
|
||||
unit tests passing), as this helps to resolve merge
|
||||
conflicts, and makes it easier to use `git bisect`
|
||||
to find bugs.
|
||||
|
||||
### Good commit messages
|
||||
|
||||
Refer to
|
||||
["How to Write a Git Commit Message"](https://cbea.ms/git-commit/)
|
||||
for general rules on writing a good commit message.
|
||||
|
||||
In addition to those guidelines, please add one of the following
|
||||
prefixes to the subject line if appropriate.
|
||||
* `fix:` - The primary purpose is to fix an existing bug.
|
||||
* `perf:` - The primary purpose is performance improvements.
|
||||
* `refactor:` - The changes refactor code without affecting
|
||||
functionality.
|
||||
* `test:` - The changes _only_ affect unit tests.
|
||||
* `docs:` - The changes _only_ affect documentation. This can
|
||||
include code comments in addition to `.md` files like this one.
|
||||
* `build:` - The changes _only_ affect the build process,
|
||||
including CMake and/or Conan settings.
|
||||
* `chore:` - Other tasks that don't affect the binary, but don't fit
|
||||
any of the other cases. e.g. formatting, git settings, updating
|
||||
Github Actions jobs.
|
||||
|
||||
Whenever possible, when updating commits after the PR is open, please
|
||||
add the PR number to the end of the subject line. e.g. `test: Add
|
||||
unit tests for Feature X (#1234)`.
|
||||
|
||||
## Pull requests
|
||||
|
||||
In general, pull requests use `develop` as the base branch.
|
||||
|
||||
(Hotfixes are an exception.)
|
||||
|
||||
Changes to pull requests must be added as new commits.
|
||||
Once code reviewers have started looking at your code, please avoid
|
||||
force-pushing a branch in a pull request.
|
||||
If your changes are not quite ready, but you want to make it easily available
|
||||
for preliminary examination or review, you can create a "Draft" pull request.
|
||||
While a pull request is marked as a "Draft", you can rebase or reorganize the
|
||||
commits in the pull request as desired.
|
||||
|
||||
Github pull requests are created as "Ready" by default, or you can mark
|
||||
a "Draft" pull request as "Ready".
|
||||
Once a pull request is marked as "Ready",
|
||||
any changes must be added as new commits. Do not
|
||||
force-push to a branch in a pull request under review.
|
||||
(This includes rebasing your branch onto the updated base branch.
|
||||
Use a merge operation, instead or hit the "Update branch" button
|
||||
at the bottom of the Github PR page.)
|
||||
This preserves the ability for reviewers to filter changes since their last
|
||||
review.
|
||||
|
||||
A pull request must obtain **approvals from at least two reviewers** before it
|
||||
can be considered for merge by a Maintainer.
|
||||
A pull request must obtain **approvals from at least two reviewers**
|
||||
before it can be considered for merge by a Maintainer.
|
||||
Maintainers retain discretion to require more approvals if they feel the
|
||||
credibility of the existing approvals is insufficient.
|
||||
|
||||
Pull requests must be merged by [squash-and-merge][2]
|
||||
to preserve a linear history for the `develop` branch.
|
||||
|
||||
### When and how to merge pull requests
|
||||
|
||||
#### "Passed"
|
||||
|
||||
A pull request should only have the "Passed" label added when it
|
||||
meets a few criteria:
|
||||
|
||||
1. It must have two approving reviews [as described
|
||||
above](#pull-requests). (Exception: PRs that are deemed "trivial"
|
||||
only need one approval.)
|
||||
2. All CI checks must be complete and passed. (One-off failures may
|
||||
be acceptable if they are related to a known issue.)
|
||||
3. The PR must have a [good commit message](#good-commit-messages).
|
||||
* If the PR started with a good commit message, and it doesn't
|
||||
need to be updated, the author can indicate that in a comment.
|
||||
* Any contributor, preferably the author, can leave a comment
|
||||
suggesting a commit message.
|
||||
* If the author squashes and rebases the code in preparation for
|
||||
merge, they should also ensure the commit message(s) are updated
|
||||
as well.
|
||||
4. The PR branch must be up to date with the base branch (usually
|
||||
`develop`). This is usually accomplised by merging the base branch
|
||||
into the feature branch, but if the other criteria are met, the
|
||||
changes can be squashed and rebased on top of the base branch.
|
||||
5. Finally, and most importantly, the author of the PR must
|
||||
positively indicate that the PR is ready to merge. That can be
|
||||
accomplished by adding the "Passed" label if their role allows,
|
||||
or by leaving a comment to the effect that the PR is ready to
|
||||
merge.
|
||||
|
||||
Once the "Passed" label is added, a maintainer may merge the PR at
|
||||
any time, so don't use it lightly.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Instructions for maintainers
|
||||
|
||||
The maintainer should double-check that the PR has met all the
|
||||
necessary criteria, and can request additional information from the
|
||||
owner, or additional reviews, and can always feel free to remove the
|
||||
"Passed" label if appropriate. The maintainer has final say on
|
||||
whether a PR gets merged, and are encouraged to communicate and
|
||||
issues or concerns to other maintainers.
|
||||
|
||||
##### Most pull requests: "Squash and merge"
|
||||
|
||||
Most pull requests don't need special handling, and can simply be
|
||||
merged using the "Squash and merge" button on the Github UI. Update
|
||||
the suggested commit message if necessary.
|
||||
|
||||
##### Slightly more complicated pull requests
|
||||
|
||||
Some pull requests need to be pushed to `develop` as more than one
|
||||
commit. There are multiple ways to accomplish this. If the author
|
||||
describes a process, and it is reasonable, follow it. Otherwise, do
|
||||
a fast forward only merge (`--ff-only`) on the command line and push.
|
||||
|
||||
Either way, check that:
|
||||
* The commits are based on the current tip of `develop`.
|
||||
* The commits are clean: No merge commits (except when reverse
|
||||
merging), no "[FOLD]" or "fixup!" messages.
|
||||
* All commits are signed. If the commits are not signed by the author, use
|
||||
`git commit --amend -S` to sign them yourself.
|
||||
* At least one (but preferably all) of the commits has the PR number
|
||||
in the commit message.
|
||||
|
||||
**Never use the "Create a merge commit" or "Rebase and merge"
|
||||
functions!**
|
||||
|
||||
##### Releases, release candidates, and betas
|
||||
|
||||
All releases, including release candidates and betas, are handled
|
||||
differently from typical PRs. Most importantly, never use
|
||||
the Github UI to merge a release.
|
||||
|
||||
1. There are two possible conditions that the `develop` branch will
|
||||
be in when preparing a release.
|
||||
1. Ready or almost ready to go: There may be one or two PRs that
|
||||
need to be merged, but otherwise, the only change needed is to
|
||||
update the version number in `BuildInfo.cpp`. In this case,
|
||||
merge those PRs as appropriate, updating the second one, and
|
||||
waiting for CI to finish in between. Then update
|
||||
`BuildInfo.cpp`.
|
||||
2. Several pending PRs: In this case, do not use the Github UI,
|
||||
because the delays waiting for CI in between each merge will be
|
||||
unnecessarily onerous. Instead, create a working branch (e.g.
|
||||
`develop-next`) based off of `develop`. Squash the changes
|
||||
from each PR onto the branch, one commit each (unless
|
||||
more are needed), being sure to sign each commit and update
|
||||
the commit message to include the PR number. You may be able
|
||||
to use a fast-forward merge for the first PR. The workflow may
|
||||
look something like:
|
||||
```
|
||||
git fetch upstream
|
||||
git checkout upstream/develop
|
||||
git checkout -b develop-next
|
||||
# Use -S on the ff-only merge if prbranch1 isn't signed.
|
||||
# Or do another branch first.
|
||||
git merge --ff-only user1/prbranch1
|
||||
git merge --squash user2/prbranch2
|
||||
git commit -S
|
||||
git merge --squash user3/prbranch3
|
||||
git commit -S
|
||||
[...]
|
||||
git push --set-upstream origin develop-next
|
||||
</pre>
|
||||
```
|
||||
2. Create the Pull Request with `release` as the base branch. If any
|
||||
of the included PRs are still open,
|
||||
[use closing keywords](https://docs.github.com/articles/closing-issues-using-keywords)
|
||||
in the description to ensure they are closed when the code is
|
||||
released. e.g. "Closes #1234"
|
||||
3. Instead of the default template, reuse and update the message from
|
||||
the previous release. Include the following verbiage somewhere in
|
||||
the description:
|
||||
```
|
||||
The base branch is release. All releases (including betas) go in
|
||||
release. This PR will be merged with --ff-only (not squashed or
|
||||
rebased, and not using the GitHub UI) to both release and develop.
|
||||
```
|
||||
4. Sign-offs for the three platforms usually occur offline, but at
|
||||
least one approval will be needed on the PR.
|
||||
5. Once everything is ready to go, open a terminal, and do the
|
||||
fast-forward merges manually. Do not push any branches until you
|
||||
verify that all of them update correctly.
|
||||
```
|
||||
git fetch upstream
|
||||
git checkout -b upstream--develop -t upstream/develop || git checkout upstream--develop
|
||||
git reset --hard upstream/develop
|
||||
# develop-next must be signed already!
|
||||
git merge --ff-only origin/develop-next
|
||||
git checkout -b upstream--release -t upstream/release || git checkout upstream--release
|
||||
git reset --hard upstream/release
|
||||
git merge --ff-only origin/develop-next
|
||||
# Only do these 3 steps if pushing a release. No betas or RCs
|
||||
git checkout -b upstream--master -t upstream/master || git checkout upstream--master
|
||||
git reset --hard upstream/master
|
||||
git merge --ff-only origin/develop-next
|
||||
# Check that all of the branches are updated
|
||||
git log -1 --oneline
|
||||
# The output should look like:
|
||||
# 02ec8b7962 (HEAD -> upstream--master, origin/develop-next, upstream--release, upstream--develop, develop-next) Set version to 2.2.0-rc1
|
||||
# Note that all of the upstream--develop/release/master are on this commit.
|
||||
# (Master will be missing for betas, etc.)
|
||||
# Just to be safe, do a dry run first:
|
||||
git push --dry-run upstream-push HEAD:develop
|
||||
git push --dry-run upstream-push HEAD:release
|
||||
# git push --dry-run upstream-push HEAD:master
|
||||
# Now push
|
||||
git push upstream-push HEAD:develop
|
||||
git push upstream-push HEAD:release
|
||||
# git push upstream-push HEAD:master
|
||||
# Don't forget to tag the release, too.
|
||||
git tag <version number>
|
||||
git push upstream-push <version number>
|
||||
```
|
||||
6. Finally
|
||||
[create a new release on Github](https://github.com/XRPLF/rippled/releases).
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# Style guide
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user