From e1b1a010f59311d7c77e36bda42ae0876dd0e00f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: TimothyBanks <tbanks@ripple.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2026 11:53:38 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] fix: Address review comments

---
 src/tests/libxrpl/tx/wasm/transactor/BytecodeSize.cpp | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/src/tests/libxrpl/tx/wasm/transactor/BytecodeSize.cpp b/src/tests/libxrpl/tx/wasm/transactor/BytecodeSize.cpp
index 89d52eab3d..c9cbd05cc9 100644
--- a/src/tests/libxrpl/tx/wasm/transactor/BytecodeSize.cpp
+++ b/src/tests/libxrpl/tx/wasm/transactor/BytecodeSize.cpp
@@ -113,7 +113,6 @@ TEST(BytecodeSize, RaisingTheLimitAdmitsALargerModule)
 // means a second limit has appeared, and that reasoning needs revisiting.
 TEST(BytecodeSize, ASingleFunctionBodyIsNotSeparatelyCapped)
 {
-    auto env = TxTest{};
     auto const wasm = codeHeavyModule(1'000'000);
     ASSERT_GT(wasm.size(), 128U * 1024U) << "the module must exceed MAX_WASM_FUNCTION_SIZE";