ARCHIVE/rippled
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/XRPLF/rippled.git synced 2026-09-27 15:28:03 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Merge branch 'pratik/otel-phase10-workload-validation' into pratik/otel-sync-diagnostics

Browse Source 
expected_spans.json kept both sides' relationship entries: this branch's
eight nodestore.rotate phase children and the upstream branch's three
cross-node pairs. Both sides appended at the same list position.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Pratik Mankawde
2026-09-22 21:31:09 +01:00
parent 881faf5620 01fdd05225
commit c8a4634cb4
2 changed files with 23 additions and 1 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

15
docker/telemetry/workload/expected_spans.json
View File

@@ -748,6 +748,21 @@
"description": "phase child, emitted only when a rotation waits",
"skip": true,
"skip_reason": "nodestore.rotate never fires under the harness; see the span note."
},
{
"parent": "tx.process",
"child": "tx.receive",
"description": "CROSS-NODE. The submitting node's tx.process span is the parent of the tx.receive span on every peer the transaction is relayed to. NetworkOPs::apply() injects the tx.process span's own context into the relayed TMTransaction (NetworkOPs.cpp:1979, the span created at :1630 by txProcessSpan), and PeerImp extracts it into a child span. Both ends emit on every run: tx_submitter.py submits to one node and the cluster relays."
},
{
"parent": "consensus.proposal.send",
"child": "consensus.proposal.receive",
"description": "CROSS-NODE. RCLConsensus::Adaptor::propose() injects the send span's own context into the TMProposeSet, and the receiving peer parents consensus.proposal.receive to it (ConsensusReceiveTracing.h, the has_trace_context() branch). Asserted rather than joined on a hash, because this pair really is parent and child. Until the send side was fixed it injected the AMBIENT context, which is never set on that thread, so every receiver silently took its freshRoot fallback and this relationship held for nobody."
},
{
"parent": "consensus.validation.send",
"child": "consensus.validation.receive",
"description": "CROSS-NODE. The same pairing for validations, injected by RCLConsensus::Adaptor::validate(). Declared separately from the proposal pair because the two send sites are independent, and a regression in one says nothing about the other."
}
],
"trace_join_groups": {