From 4984986f927166cbbd354fd0801809f41c159b07 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Valentin Balaschenko <13349202+vlntb@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2026 15:19:18 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] return back old comment

---
 src/tests/libxrpl/basics/TaggedCache.cpp | 10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff --git a/src/tests/libxrpl/basics/TaggedCache.cpp b/src/tests/libxrpl/basics/TaggedCache.cpp
index 17a86c8637..9ded975cc5 100644
--- a/src/tests/libxrpl/basics/TaggedCache.cpp
+++ b/src/tests/libxrpl/basics/TaggedCache.cpp
@@ -16,6 +16,16 @@
 
 namespace xrpl {
 
+/*
+I guess you can put some items in, make sure they're still there. Let some
+time pass, make sure they're gone. Keep a strong pointer to one of them, make
+sure you can still find it even after time passes. Create two objects with
+the same key, canonicalize them both and make sure you get the same object.
+Put an object in but keep a strong pointer to it, advance the clock a lot,
+then canonicalize a new object with the same key, make sure you get the
+original object.
+*/
+
 TEST(TaggedCacheTest, tagged_cache)
 {
     using namespace std::chrono_literals;