mirror of
https://github.com/XRPLF/rippled.git
synced 2026-08-23 15:20:54 +00:00
refactor(telemetry): route dashboards, runbook and collector work to phase-9
These changes were developed on the phase-10 branch but belong to content this branch and its upstreams introduced. Carrying them on phase-10 made its PR diff report churn in files phase-10 does not own, and left each PR claiming a scope that did not match its contents. Moved here from phase-10 (identical content, no functional change): - Dashboards: all 14 existing boards plus the new log-derived-insights board. - Docs: telemetry-runbook.md (minus the workload/benchmark sections, which describe phase-10 tooling) and the new telemetry-glossary.md. - Grafana Cloud + Alloy export path: collector config, compose override, the two .env examples and alloy/config.alloy. - Local stack: otel-collector-config.yaml gains sub-millisecond and second-scale spanmetrics buckets, pins unit=ms, and promotes close_time_correct; integration-test.sh and TESTING.md follow. - Node configs: exported_instance -> service_instance_id in comments; the mainnet sample now logs at warning to bound log volume. - Metrics code: Telemetry.cpp builds the metrics pipeline in the constructor via initMetrics() so the global MeterProvider is published before any subsystem creates a beast::insight instrument, and the histogram view keeps each instrument's own name instead of collapsing them under one series. MetricsRegistry gains a last_close_time gauge and skips negative job-queue durations. OTelCollector drops an unused accessor. - Naming CI: xrpl_work_item joins EXTERNAL_INFRA_LABELS and Rule E accepts the dotted perf-iac resource-attribute form. This must travel with the dashboards and runbook that reference those labels, or the rules fail. - Doxygen input glob no longer recurses dot-directories. Sections describing phase-10 tooling stay on phase-10 and keep their "Future Enhancement" / "Planned, not yet implemented" markers here; phase-10 removes those markers when it lands the tooling.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -59,85 +59,19 @@
|
||||
|
||||
## 8.2 Span Hierarchy Visualization
|
||||
|
||||
> **TxQ** = Transaction Queue
|
||||
The authoritative span-flow diagrams — a master overview plus per-stage
|
||||
flowcharts (ingress, the shared apply pipeline, the consensus round, ledger
|
||||
finalize, and the pathfinding / ledger-acquire side flows) — live in the operator
|
||||
runbook. They map every span onto the **real xrpld control flow and XRPL protocol
|
||||
order** (verified against code and `docs/consensus.md`, with file:line evidence),
|
||||
label every node and branch with the span that represents that state or
|
||||
transition, and call out where the OpenTelemetry span parent links diverge from
|
||||
that flow.
|
||||
|
||||
```mermaid
|
||||
flowchart TB
|
||||
subgraph trace["Trace: Transaction Lifecycle"]
|
||||
rpc["rpc.request<br/>(entry point)"]
|
||||
validate["tx.validate"]
|
||||
relay["tx.relay<br/>(parent span)"]
|
||||
> **See**: [docs/telemetry-runbook.md § Protocol Span Flow](../docs/telemetry-runbook.md#protocol-span-flow).
|
||||
|
||||
subgraph peers["Peer Spans"]
|
||||
p1["peer.send<br/>Peer A"]
|
||||
p2["peer.send<br/>Peer B"]
|
||||
p3["peer.send<br/>Peer C"]
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
subgraph pathfinding["PathFinding Spans"]
|
||||
pathfind["pathfind.request"]
|
||||
pathcomp["pathfind.compute"]
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
consensus["consensus.round"]
|
||||
apply["tx.apply"]
|
||||
|
||||
subgraph txqueue["TxQ Spans"]
|
||||
txq["txq.enqueue"]
|
||||
txqApply["txq.apply"]
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
feeCalc["fee.escalate"]
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
subgraph validators["Validator Spans"]
|
||||
valFetch["validator.list.fetch"]
|
||||
valManifest["validator.manifest"]
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
rpc --> validate
|
||||
rpc --> pathfind
|
||||
pathfind --> pathcomp
|
||||
validate --> relay
|
||||
relay --> p1
|
||||
relay --> p2
|
||||
relay --> p3
|
||||
p1 -.->|"context propagation"| consensus
|
||||
consensus --> apply
|
||||
apply --> txq
|
||||
txq --> txqApply
|
||||
txq --> feeCalc
|
||||
|
||||
style trace fill:#0f172a,stroke:#020617,color:#fff
|
||||
style peers fill:#1e3a8a,stroke:#172554,color:#fff
|
||||
style pathfinding fill:#134e4a,stroke:#0f766e,color:#fff
|
||||
style txqueue fill:#064e3b,stroke:#047857,color:#fff
|
||||
style validators fill:#4c1d95,stroke:#6d28d9,color:#fff
|
||||
style rpc fill:#1d4ed8,stroke:#1e40af,color:#fff
|
||||
style validate fill:#047857,stroke:#064e3b,color:#fff
|
||||
style relay fill:#047857,stroke:#064e3b,color:#fff
|
||||
style p1 fill:#0e7490,stroke:#155e75,color:#fff
|
||||
style p2 fill:#0e7490,stroke:#155e75,color:#fff
|
||||
style p3 fill:#0e7490,stroke:#155e75,color:#fff
|
||||
style consensus fill:#fef3c7,stroke:#fde68a,color:#1e293b
|
||||
style apply fill:#047857,stroke:#064e3b,color:#fff
|
||||
style pathfind fill:#0e7490,stroke:#155e75,color:#fff
|
||||
style pathcomp fill:#0e7490,stroke:#155e75,color:#fff
|
||||
style txq fill:#047857,stroke:#064e3b,color:#fff
|
||||
style txqApply fill:#047857,stroke:#064e3b,color:#fff
|
||||
style feeCalc fill:#047857,stroke:#064e3b,color:#fff
|
||||
style valFetch fill:#6d28d9,stroke:#4c1d95,color:#fff
|
||||
style valManifest fill:#6d28d9,stroke:#4c1d95,color:#fff
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Reading the diagram:**
|
||||
|
||||
- **rpc.request (blue, top)**: The entry point — every traced transaction starts as an RPC call; this root span is the parent of all downstream work.
|
||||
- **tx.validate and pathfind.request (green/teal, first fork)**: The RPC request fans out into transaction validation and, for cross-currency payments, a PathFinding branch (`pathfind.request` -> `pathfind.compute`).
|
||||
- **tx.relay -> Peer Spans (teal, middle)**: After validation, the transaction is relayed to peers A, B, and C in parallel; each `peer.send` is a sibling child span showing fan-out across the network.
|
||||
- **context propagation (dashed arrow)**: The dotted line from `peer.send Peer A` to `consensus.round` represents the trace context crossing a node boundary — the receiving validator picks up the same `trace_id` and continues the trace.
|
||||
- **consensus.round -> tx.apply -> TxQ Spans (green, lower)**: Once consensus accepts the transaction, it is applied to the ledger; the TxQ spans (`txq.enqueue`, `txq.apply`, `fee.escalate`) capture queue depth and fee escalation behavior.
|
||||
- **Validator Spans (purple, detached)**: `validator.list.fetch` and `validator.manifest` are independent workflows for UNL management — they run on their own traces and are linked to consensus via Span Links, not parent-child relationships.
|
||||
The full span inventory (names, attributes, parents as instrumented) is in
|
||||
[09-data-collection-reference.md §1](./09-data-collection-reference.md#1-opentelemetry-spans).
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user