Fix FillOrKill kill handling of found unfunded orders.

This commit is contained in:
Arthur Britto
2013-03-07 16:40:00 -08:00
parent 394c7be704
commit 15942616e8
4 changed files with 59 additions and 42 deletions

View File

@@ -46,7 +46,6 @@ TER OfferCreateTransactor::takeOffers(
const uint160 uTakerGetsAccountID = saTakerGets.getIssuer();
TER terResult = temUNCERTAIN;
boost::unordered_set<uint256> usOfferUnfundedFound; // Offers found unfunded.
boost::unordered_set<uint256> usOfferUnfundedBecame; // Offers that became unfunded.
boost::unordered_set<uint160> usAccountTouched; // Accounts touched.
@@ -153,7 +152,7 @@ TER OfferCreateTransactor::takeOffers(
// Would take own offer. Consider old offer expired. Delete it.
cLog(lsINFO) << "takeOffers: encountered taker's own old offer";
usOfferUnfundedFound.insert(uOfferIndex);
usOfferUnfundedBecame.insert(uOfferIndex);
}
else if (!saOfferGets.isPositive() || !saOfferPays.isPositive())
{
@@ -304,20 +303,6 @@ TER OfferCreateTransactor::takeOffers(
cLog(lsINFO) << "takeOffers: " << transToken(terResult);
// On storing meta data, delete offers that were found unfunded to prevent encountering them in future.
if (tesSUCCESS == terResult)
{
BOOST_FOREACH(const uint256& uOfferIndex, usOfferUnfundedFound)
{
cLog(lsINFO) << "takeOffers: found unfunded: " << uOfferIndex.ToString();
terResult = mEngine->getNodes().offerDelete(uOfferIndex);
if (tesSUCCESS != terResult)
break;
}
}
if (tesSUCCESS == terResult)
{
// On success, delete offers that became unfunded.
@@ -369,6 +354,9 @@ TER OfferCreateTransactor::doApply()
uint64 uOwnerNode;
uint64 uBookNode;
LedgerEntrySet& lesActive = mEngine->getNodes();
LedgerEntrySet lesCheckpoint = lesActive; // Checkpoint with just fees paid.
if (uTxFlags & tfOfferCreateMask)
{
cLog(lsINFO) << "OfferCreate: Malformed transaction: Invalid flags set.";
@@ -500,7 +488,7 @@ TER OfferCreateTransactor::doApply()
else if (bFillOrKill && (saTakerPays || saTakerGets))
{
// Fill or kill and have leftovers.
terResult = tecKILL;
lesActive.swapWith(lesCheckpoint); // Restore with just fees paid.
}
else if (
!saTakerPays // Wants nothing more.
@@ -599,6 +587,20 @@ TER OfferCreateTransactor::doApply()
}
}
// On storing meta data, delete offers that were found unfunded to prevent encountering them in future.
if (tesSUCCESS == terResult)
{
BOOST_FOREACH(const uint256& uOfferIndex, usOfferUnfundedFound)
{
cLog(lsINFO) << "takeOffers: found unfunded: " << uOfferIndex.ToString();
terResult = mEngine->getNodes().offerDelete(uOfferIndex);
if (tesSUCCESS != terResult)
break;
}
}
tLog(tesSUCCESS != terResult, lsINFO) << boost::str(boost::format("OfferCreate: final terResult=%s") % transToken(terResult));
if (isTesSuccess(terResult))

View File

@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
class OfferCreateTransactor : public Transactor
{
protected:
TER takeOffers(
const bool bOpenLedger,
const bool bPassive,
@@ -17,6 +18,8 @@ class OfferCreateTransactor : public Transactor
STAmount& saTakerGot,
bool& bUnfunded);
boost::unordered_set<uint256> usOfferUnfundedFound; // Offers found unfunded.
public:
OfferCreateTransactor(const SerializedTransaction& txn,TransactionEngineParams params, TransactionEngine* engine) : Transactor(txn,params,engine) {}
TER doApply();

View File

@@ -944,9 +944,8 @@ TER RippleCalc::calcNodeAdvance(
if (musUnfundedFound.find(uOfferIndex) != musUnfundedFound.end())
{
// Reverse should have previously put bad offer in list.
// An internal error previously left a bad offer.
cLog(lsWARNING) << boost::str(boost::format("calcNodeAdvance: REVERSE INTERNAL ERROR: NON-POSITIVE: saTakerPays=%s saTakerGets=%s")
// An internal error, offer was found failed to place this in musUnfundedFound.
cLog(lsWARNING) << boost::str(boost::format("calcNodeAdvance: PAST INTERNAL ERROR: OFFER NON-POSITIVE: saTakerPays=%s saTakerGets=%s")
% saTakerPays % saTakerGets);
// Just skip it. It will be deleted.
@@ -954,16 +953,19 @@ TER RippleCalc::calcNodeAdvance(
}
else
{
// An internal error failed to place this in musUnfundedFound.
cLog(lsWARNING) << boost::str(boost::format("calcNodeAdvance: OFFER INTERNAL ERROR: NON-POSITIVE: saTakerPays=%s saTakerGets=%s")
// Reverse should have previously put bad offer in list.
// An internal error previously left a bad offer.
cLog(lsWARNING) << boost::str(boost::format("calcNodeAdvance: INTERNAL ERROR: OFFER NON-POSITIVE: saTakerPays=%s saTakerGets=%s")
% saTakerPays % saTakerGets);
assert(false);
// Don't process at all, things are in an unexpected state for this transactions.
terResult = tefEXCEPTION;
}
continue;
}
bEntryAdvance = false;
// Allowed to access source from this node?
// XXX This can get called multiple times for same source in a row, caching result would be nice.
// XXX Going forward could we fund something with a worse quality which was previously skipped? Might need to check
@@ -982,25 +984,12 @@ TER RippleCalc::calcNodeAdvance(
continue;
}
curIssuerNodeConstIterator itPast = mumSource.find(asLine);
bool bFoundPast = itPast != mumSource.end();
// Don't allow a source of funding used in previous increments to be reused.
// XXX This seems overly strict. Why???
if (bFoundPast && itPast->second != uNode)
{
// Temporarily unfunded. Another node uses this source, ignore in this offer.
cLog(lsTRACE) << "calcNodeAdvance: temporarily unfunded offer (past)";
bEntryAdvance = true;
continue;
}
// This is overly strict. For contributions to past. We should only count source if actually used.
curIssuerNodeConstIterator itReverse = psCur.umReverse.find(asLine);
bool bFoundReverse = itReverse != psCur.umReverse.end();
// For this increment, only allow a source to be used once, in the first node encountered from applying offers in
// reverse.
// For this quality increment, only allow a source to be used from a single node, in the first node encountered from applying offers
// in reverse.
if (bFoundReverse && itReverse->second != uNode)
{
// Temporarily unfunded. Another node uses this source, ignore in this offer.
@@ -1010,7 +999,23 @@ TER RippleCalc::calcNodeAdvance(
continue;
}
saOfferFunds = lesActive.accountFunds(uOfrOwnerID, saTakerGets); // Funds left.
curIssuerNodeConstIterator itPast = mumSource.find(asLine);
bool bFoundPast = itPast != mumSource.end();
// Determine if used in past.
// XXX Restriction seems like a misunderstanding.
if (bFoundPast && itPast->second != uNode)
{
// Temporarily unfunded. Another node uses this source, ignore in this offer.
cLog(lsTRACE) << "calcNodeAdvance: temporarily unfunded offer (past)";
bEntryAdvance = true;
continue;
}
// Only the current node is allowed to use the source.
saOfferFunds = lesActive.accountFunds(uOfrOwnerID, saTakerGets); // Funds held.
if (!saOfferFunds.isPositive())
{
@@ -1019,9 +1024,17 @@ TER RippleCalc::calcNodeAdvance(
if (bReverse && !bFoundReverse && !bFoundPast)
{
// Never mentioned before: found unfunded.
// Never mentioned before, clearly just: found unfunded.
// That is, even if this offer fails due to fill or kill still do deletions.
musUnfundedFound.insert(uOfferIndex); // Mark offer for always deletion.
}
else
{
// Moving forward, don't need to check again.
// Or source was used this reverse
// Or source was previously used
// XXX
}
// YYY Could verify offer is correct place for unfundeds.
bEntryAdvance = true;

View File

@@ -123,7 +123,6 @@ enum TER // aka TransactionEngineResult
tecUNFUNDED_OFFER = 103,
tecUNFUNDED_PAYMENT = 104,
tecFAILED_PROCESSING = 105,
tecKILL = 106, // tesSUCCESS is not retryable.
tecDIR_FULL = 121,
tecINSUF_RESERVE_LINE = 122,
tecINSUF_RESERVE_OFFER = 123,