From 076add0e73d8a53ae73435e80cef8e0195f44d82 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: JoelKatz <DavidJoelSchwartz@GMail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 14:13:20 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] Be more aggressive about relaying disputed transactions.

---
 src/cpp/ripple/LedgerConsensus.cpp | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/cpp/ripple/LedgerConsensus.cpp b/src/cpp/ripple/LedgerConsensus.cpp
index 66203e3b4b..784ee068f7 100644
--- a/src/cpp/ripple/LedgerConsensus.cpp
+++ b/src/cpp/ripple/LedgerConsensus.cpp
@@ -966,8 +966,8 @@ void LedgerConsensus::addDisputedTransaction(const uint256& txID, const std::vec
 			txn->setVote(pit.first, cit->second->hasItem(txID));
 	}
 
-	if (!ourVote && theApp->isNewFlag(txID, SF_RELAYED))
-	{ // We voted no and a trusted peer voted yes, so relay
+	if (theApp->isNewFlag(txID, SF_RELAYED))
+	{
 		ripple::TMTransaction msg;
 		msg.set_rawtransaction(&(tx.front()), tx.size());
 		msg.set_status(ripple::tsNEW);