Builds the Linux packages with CPack.
Generate them by running Conan with `--options:host "&:package=True"
--options:host "&:static=True"` then after the build you can run `cpack
.` in the build directory.
@mathbunnyru Where do you think this should be built? QA needs a package
per-commit.
@godexsoft What to do with the `config.json` and service file. I can
just remove them or strip the comment out but it still won't work out
the box with the default `rippled.cfg`. Relates to #2191.
---------
Co-authored-by: Ayaz Salikhov <mathbunnyru@users.noreply.github.com>
Bumps
[actions/download-artifact](https://github.com/actions/download-artifact)
from 4 to 5.
<details>
<summary>Release notes</summary>
<p><em>Sourced from <a
href="https://github.com/actions/download-artifact/releases">actions/download-artifact's
releases</a>.</em></p>
<blockquote>
<h2>v5.0.0</h2>
<h2>What's Changed</h2>
<ul>
<li>Update README.md by <a
href="https://github.com/nebuk89"><code>@nebuk89</code></a> in <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/download-artifact/pull/407">actions/download-artifact#407</a></li>
<li>BREAKING fix: inconsistent path behavior for single artifact
downloads by ID by <a
href="https://github.com/GrantBirki"><code>@GrantBirki</code></a> in <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/download-artifact/pull/416">actions/download-artifact#416</a></li>
</ul>
<h2>v5.0.0</h2>
<h3>🚨 Breaking Change</h3>
<p>This release fixes an inconsistency in path behavior for single
artifact downloads by ID. <strong>If you're downloading single artifacts
by ID, the output path may change.</strong></p>
<h4>What Changed</h4>
<p>Previously, <strong>single artifact downloads</strong> behaved
differently depending on how you specified the artifact:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>By name</strong>: <code>name: my-artifact</code> → extracted
to <code>path/</code> (direct)</li>
<li><strong>By ID</strong>: <code>artifact-ids: 12345</code> → extracted
to <code>path/my-artifact/</code> (nested)</li>
</ul>
<p>Now both methods are consistent:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>By name</strong>: <code>name: my-artifact</code> → extracted
to <code>path/</code> (unchanged)</li>
<li><strong>By ID</strong>: <code>artifact-ids: 12345</code> → extracted
to <code>path/</code> (fixed - now direct)</li>
</ul>
<h4>Migration Guide</h4>
<h5>✅ No Action Needed If:</h5>
<ul>
<li>You download artifacts by <strong>name</strong></li>
<li>You download <strong>multiple</strong> artifacts by ID</li>
<li>You already use <code>merge-multiple: true</code> as a
workaround</li>
</ul>
<h5>⚠️ Action Required If:</h5>
<p>You download <strong>single artifacts by ID</strong> and your
workflows expect the nested directory structure.</p>
<p><strong>Before v5 (nested structure):</strong></p>
<pre lang="yaml"><code>- uses: actions/download-artifact@v4
with:
artifact-ids: 12345
path: dist
# Files were in: dist/my-artifact/
</code></pre>
<blockquote>
<p>Where <code>my-artifact</code> is the name of the artifact you
previously uploaded</p>
</blockquote>
<p><strong>To maintain old behavior (if needed):</strong></p>
<pre lang="yaml"><code></tr></table>
</code></pre>
</blockquote>
<p>... (truncated)</p>
</details>
<details>
<summary>Commits</summary>
<ul>
<li><a
href="634f93cb29"><code>634f93c</code></a>
Merge pull request <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/download-artifact/issues/416">#416</a>
from actions/single-artifact-id-download-path</li>
<li><a
href="b19ff43027"><code>b19ff43</code></a>
refactor: resolve download path correctly in artifact download tests
(mainly ...</li>
<li><a
href="e262cbee4a"><code>e262cbe</code></a>
bundle dist</li>
<li><a
href="bff23f9308"><code>bff23f9</code></a>
update docs</li>
<li><a
href="fff8c148a8"><code>fff8c14</code></a>
fix download path logic when downloading a single artifact by id</li>
<li><a
href="448e3f862a"><code>448e3f8</code></a>
Merge pull request <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/download-artifact/issues/407">#407</a>
from actions/nebuk89-patch-1</li>
<li><a
href="47225c44b3"><code>47225c4</code></a>
Update README.md</li>
<li>See full diff in <a
href="https://github.com/actions/download-artifact/compare/v4...v5">compare
view</a></li>
</ul>
</details>
<br />
[](https://docs.github.com/en/github/managing-security-vulnerabilities/about-dependabot-security-updates#about-compatibility-scores)
Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't
alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting
`@dependabot rebase`.
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-start)
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-end)
---
<details>
<summary>Dependabot commands and options</summary>
<br />
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
- `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR
- `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits
that have been made to it
- `@dependabot merge` will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
- `@dependabot squash and merge` will squash and merge this PR after
your CI passes on it
- `@dependabot cancel merge` will cancel a previously requested merge
and block automerging
- `@dependabot reopen` will reopen this PR if it is closed
- `@dependabot close` will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating
it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
- `@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions` will show all
of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
- `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen
the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen
the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the
PR or upgrade to it yourself)
</details>
Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Ayaz Salikhov <mathbunnyru@users.noreply.github.com>
Updates the GitHub Actions workflow concurrency configuration to allow
parallel execution of workflows on the `develop` branch while
maintaining cancellation behavior for other branches.
## Problem
Previously, all workflow runs were subject to cancellation when new
commits were pushed to the same branch (`cancel-in-progress: true`).
This caused issues on the `develop` branch where important CI runs could
be prematurely cancelled, potentially missing critical feedback on the
main development branch.
## Solution
Modified the `concurrency` settings in `.github/workflows/build.yml` to
use separate concurrency groups and conditional cancellation:
```yaml
concurrency:
# Use separate concurrency groups for develop vs other branches to prevent cross-cancellation
group: ${{ github.workflow }}-${{ github.ref }}-${{ github.ref == 'refs/heads/develop' && github.run_number || 'branch' }}
cancel-in-progress: ${{ github.ref != 'refs/heads/develop' }}
```
## Behavior
- **`develop` branch**: Each run gets its own concurrency group (using
`run_number`), allowing parallel execution without cancellation or
queuing delays
- **All other branches**: Shared concurrency group with
`cancel-in-progress: true` - workflows are cancelled when new commits
are pushed
This ensures that the `develop` branch can run multiple workflows in
parallel without interference while still providing the efficiency
benefits of workflow cancellation on feature branches and pull requests.
<!-- START COPILOT CODING AGENT TIPS -->
---
💬 Share your feedback on Copilot coding agent for the chance to win a
$200 gift card! Click
[here](https://survey.alchemer.com/s3/8343779/Copilot-Coding-agent) to
start the survey.
---------
Co-authored-by: copilot-swe-agent[bot] <198982749+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: kuznetsss <15742918+kuznetsss@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: mathbunnyru <12270691+mathbunnyru@users.noreply.github.com>
…s to set version
Advantages:
- not modifying src dir in build time (`git clean` will also remove
less)
- simpler codecov (if we decide to move it to separate stage in the
future)
- The cpp file is perfectly valid, so it will be treated as a C++ files
by all the tooling
- No need to use CMAKE_PROJECT_INCLUDE_BEFORE, should work fine without
it
- Instead of generating + recompiling, we will just be doing
recompilation of 1 file
